Next Article in Journal
A Comprehensive Review of Niobium Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Characterization, Applications in Health Sciences, and Future Challenges
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis of ZnO Nanoparticles by Bacillus subtilis for Efficient Photocatalytic Degradation of Cyanide
Previous Article in Journal
‘Ship-in-a-Bottle’ Integration of pH-Sensitive 3D Proteinaceous Meshes into Microfluidic Channels
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sustainable Graphene Production: Flash Joule Heating Utilizing Pencil Graphite Precursors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cu0-Functionalized, ZIF-8-Derived, Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Composites for Efficient Iodine Elimination in Solution

1
School of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China
2
Key Laboratory for Protected Agricultural Engineering in the Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River, Institute of Agricultural Facilities and Equipment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Lake Science and Environment, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2025, 15(2), 105; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15020105
Submission received: 28 November 2024 / Revised: 17 December 2024 / Accepted: 25 December 2024 / Published: 12 January 2025

Abstract

:
The development of copper-based materials with a high efficiency and low cost is desirable for use in iodine (I2) remediation. Herein, Cu0-nanoparticles-functionalized, ZIF-8 (Zeolite Imidazole Framework-8)-derived, nitrogen-doped carbon composites (Cu@Zn-NC) were synthesized by ball milling and pyrolysis processes. The as-prepared composites were characterized using SEM, BET, XRD, XPS, and FT-IR analyses. The results showed that the morphology of ZIF-8 changed from a leaf-like structure into an irregular structure after the introduction of a copper salt and carbonization. The copper in the pyrolysis samples was mainly in the form of Cu0 particles. The presence of an appropriate amount of Cu0 particles could increase the specific surface area of Cu@Zn-NC. The subsequent batch adsorption results demonstrated that the as-fabricated composites showed high I2 adsorption amounts (1204.9 mg/g) and relatively fast dynamics in an iodine–cyclohexane solution when the Cu content was 30% and the pyrolysis temperature was 600 °C, outperforming the other Cu-based materials. The isothermal adsorption followed both Langmuir and Dubinin–Radushkevich isotherm models, while the kinetics of I2 adsorption followed a pseudo-second-order kinetic model. The activation energy (Eα) of the adsorbent was determined to be 47.2 kJ/mol, according to the Arrhenius equation. According to the experimental and DFT analyses, I2-Zn interactions and I2-Cu0 chemisorption jointly promoted the elimination of iodine. In general, this study provided an operative adsorbent for the highly effective capture of iodine in solution, which might be worth applying on a large scale.

1. Introduction

Currently, diverse inorganic, organic, and metallic contaminants are inevitably generated in industrial processes [1,2,3]. The emission of pollutants could directly or indirectly enter water bodies, causing water pollution and creating a serious threat to the sustainable use of water resources while having a non-negligible impact on human health and ecosystems [2,4]. Therefore, water pollution has become an environmental problem that the world is facing at present. Iodine (I) is one of the pollutants that causes water pollution and is extremely undesirable due to its potential toxicity [1,5]. Its emission sources include iodine radioisotopes generated by nuclear fission in the process of nuclear energy utilization, wastes produced during water disinfection and purification, and wastes from scientific research institutions, among others [1,2]. Iodine mainly exists in the inorganic form (e.g., I2, I, or IO3) in wastewater [5]. The I2 species in the solution is easily assimilated by the human body via the food chain, which can have a negative impact on the normal metabolic processes [4,6,7]. Therefore, effective handling of iodine pollutants is essential to maintain the safety of ecological water environments and public health.
Surface adsorption is considered an economical and effective method for water pollutant treatment [8,9,10]. In this approach, various materials, such as carbon-based materials [11,12,13], covalent organic frameworks (COFs) [14,15], aerogels [16,17], and metal oxide-based materials [18,19,20], have been designed and applied to eliminate contaminants from aqueous solutions. Previous studies have suggested that adsorbents containing silver [21,22], copper [23,24], and bismuth [25,26] as the active adsorption components could enhance the interactions with iodine by providing valence electrons through π-complexation, thereby improving iodine adsorption efficiency [27]. In particular, silver-containing materials can outperform the other two metal-based composites in terms of equilibrium adsorption amount, stability, and adsorption kinetics for I2 capture [25,28]. Nevertheless, the toxicity and high cost of silver species restrict their large-scale application, rendering them impractical for utilization [29]. Cu-based materials have several advantages over silver-based materials, including a lower cost, less toxicity, and greater usability. Additionally, metallic copper or cuprous materials can react with I2 to form thermodynamically stable compounds (CuI), which are beneficial for the subsequent immobilization and stable storage of iodine-containing waste [8,30]. Therefore, more research has begun to explore strategies to improve the stability and iodine removal activity of Cu-based composites. To date, various Cu-based adsorbents, including Cu/MIL-101 [23], Cu-loaded zeolites [31], Cu0-SBA-15 [24], GA-Cu-ED [32], Cu2+-MOF-303 [30], and Cu/ZnO@C [8], have been synthesized and showed relatively high I2 adsorption capacities. For example, He et al. [24] prepared Cu0-SBA-15 with high thermal stability and applied it to eliminate I2. The batch adsorption test showed that the I2 adsorption capacity of Cu0-SBA-15 reached 842 mg/g. Miensah et al. [8] discovered that Cu/ZnO@C materials had an outstanding I2 capture capacity (1208 mg/g). However, they had a slow adsorption rate, and approximately 15 h was required to reach equilibrium adsorption. These results revealed that combining a high adsorption capacity with fast reaction kinetics is still a challenge for Cu-based adsorbents. Previous research has established that the uptake activity of a Cu-based adsorbents is connected to both the active sites and the support materials [29,33]. Therefore, further investigation into the influence of the substrate on the adsorption behavior is required in order to develop a strategy for designing Cu-based materials with a superior I2 removal ability.
Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are crystalline substances that are characterized by a topology resulting from the self-assembly of metal ions and organic ligands [30,34]. They exhibit benefits like elevated porosity, an extensive specific surface area, a low density, and diverse compositions. Based on these excellent properties, MOFs have found extensive applications, such as adsorption [19,23], catalysis [34], and storage applications [35]. Recent investigations have utilized MOF materials for iodine capture [10]. Although MOFs exhibit high iodine adsorption capacities, they are unstable under humid conditions and are prone to desorption after adsorption [36,37]. To address these aforementioned deficiencies, various carbon matrix-encapsulated active metal composites were prepared using MOFs as sacrificial templates [29,38]. The materials not only inherited the advantages of a large specific surface area and the porosity characteristic of MOFs, but this process also mitigated the drawback of inadequate stability in aqueous environments. Meanwhile, introducing active metals with a strong chemical affinity for iodine could also solve the issue of desorption after adsorption.
Inspired by this, herein, metallic-Cu-nanoparticles-decorated carbonaceous complexes (Cu@Zn-NC) were synthesized via pyrolysis of Cu-doped ZIF-8 precursors (Cu@ZIF-8). Thereafter, batch adsorption studies were conducted to assess the adsorption characteristics of the obtained composites based on initial I2 concentration, contact duration, and operational temperature. Simultaneously, the assessment of reusability was also conducted. The results of batch adsorption were integrated with density functional theory (DFT) theoretical calculations to systematically explore putative I2 removal mechanisms by the resultant composites.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Zinc nitrate hexahydrate (Zn(NO3)2·6H2O, Analytical Reagent, 99%), melamine (C3H6N6, Analytical Reagent, 99.5%), 2-Methylimidazole (2-MeIm, Analytical Reagent, 98%), cyclohexane (C6H12), absolute ethanol (C2H6O, Analytical Reagent, 99%), copper nitrate hydrate (Cu(NO3)2·3H2O, Analytical Reagent), and iodine (solid crystals, Analytical Reagent, 99.8%) were obtained from Shanghai Acmec Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) and Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), respectively. All aforementioned agents were of analytical purity and necessitated no additional purification.

2.2. Synthesis of ZIF-8 and Cu@ZIF-8

The synthesis process of ZIF-8 closely resembled that outlined in the literature [39]. In a typical synthesis, 100 mL of deionized water containing 3.3 g 2-MeIm and 1.2 g melamine was quickly mixed with another 100 mL of deionized water dissolved in 1.8 g Zn (NO3)2·6H2O. After stirring for 24 h at room temperature, the ZIF-8 precipitate was centrifuged, washed several times with ethanol, and dried in a vacuum at 60 °C overnight.
The Cu@ZIF-8 composite was typically fabricated using the following process: The prepared ZIF-8 powder (1.0 g) and different amounts of Cu (NO3)2·3H2O were ball-milled in a ball mill for 15 min at a speed of 300 r/min. Following this, the above samples were manually ground again for 15 min. The obtained product was labeled as xCu@ZIF-8, where x (x = 10%, 20% and 30%) was the mass ratio of Cu.

2.3. Synthesis of Cu@Zn-NC

The xCu@ZIF-8 precursor was subjected to pyrolysis in a tube furnace at 600 °C for 2 h in an argon environment, with a ramping rate of 5 °C/min. After the sample had naturally cooled to room temperature, it was collected. The obtained sample was designated as xCu@Zn-NC. For comparison, the Zn-NC product was also synthesized from the pyrolysis of ZIF-8 utilizing the same methodology. The synthesis protocol is illustrated in Figure 1.

2.4. Characterization

The morphology of the fabricated samples was characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JSM-IT500HR, JEOL Ltd., Akishima-shi, Japan). The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area and pore size distributions were recorded using N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms (BSD-660, Beishide Instrument Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). The phase and crystal structure were assessed with X-ray diffraction (XRD, Rigaku smartlab9, Rigaku Ltd., Akishima-shi, Japan). The composition and oxidation states of elements in the materials were examined via X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo Kalpha, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The surface functional group was measured using a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FT-IR, Nicolet IS50, Thermo Scientific, MA, USA).

2.5. Batch Adsorption Experiments

Batch adsorption tests, including isotherm adsorption, kinetics adsorption, thermodynamic adsorption, and reusability evaluation, were undertaken to assess the adsorption ability of the produced samples for I2. The detailed experimental procedure was as follows:

2.5.1. Adsorption Isotherm Experiment

A total of 20 mg of the resultant composites was added to 20 mL of cyclohexane solution with I2 concentrations ranging from 300 to 2500 mg/L. The above turbid solution was stirred vigorously for 8 h. Then, 2 mL of supernatant was sampled and filtered with a 0.22 μm membrane filter. The I2 concentrations remaining in the diluted supernatant were detected using a UV–vis spectrophotometer at 523 nm.

2.5.2. Adsorption Kinetic Experiment

The cyclohexane solution with an I2 concentration of 2500 mg/L was prepared, and then 200 mg of the resultant materials was added while stirring (stirring rate: 1200 rpm). After stirring for a certain period of time, 2 mL of the supernatant was sampled and filtered with the 0.22 μm membrane filter. The I2 concentrations remaining in the diluted supernatant were detected by UV–vis spectrophotometer at 523 nm.

2.5.3. The Effect of the Solution Temperature

The cyclohexane solution with an I2 concentration of 2500 mg/L was prepared, and then 200 mg of a 30%Cu@Zn-NC sample was added into the above solution by stirring at 25, 35, 45, and 55 °C, respectively. After stirring for a certain period of time, 2 mL of the supernatant was sampled and filtered with the 0.22 μm membrane filter. The I2 concentrations remaining in the diluted supernatant were detected by UV–vis spectrophotometer at 523 nm.

2.5.4. Regeneration and Reusability Evaluation

The adsorbents after saturated adsorption were collected and dried under vacuum at 65 °C for 12 h. Then, the post-adsorbed material was calcined at 600 °C for 2 h under argon atmosphere. Reusability tests were conducted through adsorption–regeneration steps.

2.6. Theoretical Simulation Calculation

A density functional theory (DFT) calculation was conducted to examine the interactions between the fabricated materials and I2 using the Materials Studio 2020 and Vienna First Principles Simulation Package (VASP 6.1.0). The Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) functional in the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) was used to describe the electron–ion interaction. The cutoff energy of the plane wave basis was set to 400 eV, and the gamma point was used to sample the first Brillouin zone. The accuracy of the electronic self-consistency was set to 10−5 eV between two electronic steps. The structure was completely relaxed by converging the residual forces between atoms below 0.001 eV/Å. In addition, a vacuum layer with a thickness greater than 15 Å was added to prevent interference during the calculation process. Finally, the Gaussian tailing method with σ = 0.1 eV was used to better assist the electronic convergence. The definition of the adsorption energy (Eads) was as follows:
E a d s = E a d s o r b e n t + I 2 ( E a d s o r b e n t + E I 2 )
where Eadsorbent+I2, Eadsorbent, and EI2 represented the total energy of I2 adsorbed on the adsorbent surface, the unoccupied adsorbent surface, and I2 compounds, respectively.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Materials Characterization

The morphologies of the samples were characterized using SEM. As presented in Figure 2a, ZIF-8 particles exhibited a smooth surface and leaf-like morphology with length and thickness at the micrometer and nanometer levels, respectively. After copper introduction, the leaf-like morphology of the ZIF-8 sample disappeared and was replaced by an irregular morphology with a layer of flocculent structure covered on the surface (Figure 2b,c). Upon pyrolysis, the morphology and structure changed. As shown in Figure 2d,g, the leaf-like structure of ZIF-8 collapsed due to its inferior mechanical stability, resulting in a polyhedron with random distribution and irregular shape. This change indicated that the organic ligand of ZIF-8 might decompose during high-temperature calcination, resulting in the collapse of the crystal structure and the formation of a structure with more pores. These pore structures were conducive to increasing the specific surface area, potentially improving its performance in catalytic or adsorption processes [38,40]. In the case of xCu@Zn-NC (Figure 2e,f,h,i), a pronounced porous structure was observed, and the pore size increased with the increasing Cu content. The elevated content of Cu species (nitrate) might exacerbate the disintegration of ZIF-8 during pyrolysis, intensifying structural collapse and thus forming a large number of macroporous structures [29,38].
The specific surface area and pore structure of Zn-NC and xCu@Zn-NC samples were tested by the N2 adsorption–desorption analysis. Figure 3 demonstrated that all samples displayed type IV isotherms, signifying that the porous structures were primarily mesoporous [29,41]. This observation could be further corroborated by the BJH pore size distribution curves, which showed the pore sizes of Zn-NC, 10%Cu@Zn-NC, 20%Cu@Zn-NC, and 30%Cu@Zn-NC samples were centered at around 2.23, 2.11, 2.12, and 2.32 nm, respectively. The BET surface areas of the samples were determined using N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms, and Table S1 provides a summary of the findings. Pure Zn-NC, 10%Cu@Zn-NC, 20%Cu@Zn-NC, and 30%Cu@Zn-NC were found to have BET specific surface areas of 1.98, 11.50, 9.66, and 1.50 m2/g, respectively. Obviously, the presence of an adequate amount of Cu particles could increase the specific surface area of xCu@Zn-NC. Nevertheless, the specific surface area decreased with the Cu content increasing. This could be attributed to the formation of larger particles during the carbonization process, as evidenced by the SEM results (Figure 2f,i).
The phase composition and crystal structure of the composites were examined with XRD. The XRD spectra (Figure 4a) of the ZIF-8 sample showed sharp diffraction peaks at around 10.9°, 13.5°, 15.2°, 17.0°, 18.0°, 25.5°, 27.7°, 28.6°, 32.8°, and 34.9°, corresponding to (002), (112), (022), (013), (222), (114), (233), (134), (044), and (244) crystal planes, respectively. The relative intensities and prominent diffraction peak positions implied the formation of ZIF-8 crystals [42,43]. With the exception of the ZIF-8 crystals, several diffraction peaks ascribed to Cu(NO3)2·2.5H2O (JCPDS No. 75-1493) were also observed at around 13.5°, 25.5°, and 27.7° for xCu@ZIF-8 samples [44]. This could be the primary cause of variations in the diffraction intensity. After pyrolysis treatment, the characteristic diffraction peaks ascribed to ZIF-8 vanished, and a broadened derivative peak attributed to the (002) crystal plane of hexagonal graphitic carbon (JCPDS No. 89-8489) appeared at 2θ = 22.8° (Figure 4 and Figure S1), indicating that the organic matter in the precursor converted into the carbon matrix [3,45]. As for xCu@Zn-NC samples, three new sharp crystal diffraction peaks were detected at 2θ = 42.7°, 49.8°, and 72.8°, belonging to (111), (200), and (220) planes of Cu0 (JCPDS No. 04-0836), respectively. Additionally, as the percentage of Cu rosed from 10% to 30%, the intensity of the metallic Cu diffraction peaks increased.
XPS research was performed to further examine the surface composition and oxidation state of elements in Zn-NC and 30%Cu@Zn-NC composites. Figure 5a and Table S2 confirmed the presence of Cu element in the 30%Cu@Zn-NC sample, while Zn, N, O, and C elements were distinctly observable in both samples. The Zn 2p XPS spectra (Figure 5b) for both samples had two peaks, which were attributed to Zn 2p3/2 and Zn 2p1/2, respectively. The Zn in Zn-NC and 30%Cu@Zn-NC was mostly present as Zn2+, as indicated by the binding energy difference of almost 23.0 eV between the two peaks [46]. Meanwhile, the analysis of the XRD pattern (Figure 4b) revealed the absence of diffraction peaks corresponding to Zn or ZnO, potentially indicating that the Zn species presented in an amorphous state in matrix [29]. The C 1s XPS spectra (Figure 5c) of the 30%Cu@Zn-NC sample could be deconvoluted into two peaks, representing the sp2-hybridized graphitic carbon C-C/C=C (284.8 eV) and C=N/C-O (286.1 eV) [3,47,48], respectively. Compared with 30%Cu@Zn-NC, the binding energy of C=N/C-O (285.9 eV) in Zn-NC had a slight shift (0.2 eV), which might be resulting from the incorporation of Cu. The N 1s XPS spectra (Figure 5d) could be deconvoluted into two peaks of C=N and C-N (C-N/Cu-N for the 30%Cu@Zn-NC sample), respectively. The presence of Cu-N peaks indicated that N could interact with atomically dispersed metal atoms to generate M-Nx, while the shift of the binding energy of C-N/Cu-N peaks revealed N could influence the electronic characteristics of the carbon structure [3]. The O 1s XPS spectra (Figure 5e) was asymmetric and could be deconvoluted into three peaks, assigning to the C-O=C, C-O, and lattice oxygen, respectively. The Cu 2p XPS spectra (Figure 5f) in 30%Cu@Zn-NC exhibited two characteristic peaks of Cu 2p3/2 and Cu 2p1/2 at binding energies of 952.6 and 932.7 eV, respectively. No satellite peaks were found, suggesting that Cu in 30%Cu@Zn-NC existed as Cu0 or Cu+ [24,29,38]. Combining the XRD analysis, Cu in 30%Cu@ Zn-NC existed in the Cu0 form.
FT-IR spectra was conducted to examine the functional groups in the xCu@Zn-NC samples (Figure 6). As depicted, the observed faint wideband at 3342 cm−1 corresponded to the stretching vibration of O-H, which resulted from the adsorption of ambient water molecules [38]. The bands around 1042, 1245 and 1306 cm−1 indexed to the stretching vibration of C-O, C-N and C=C bonds [49,50,51], respectively. The weak band at 1649 cm−1 was ascribed to the C=N stretching vibration [52]. These findings fundamentally corresponded with the results acquired from XPS analysis.

3.2. Batch Adsorption Performance

3.2.1. Adsorption Isothermal Analysis

The influence of Cu proportion and pyrolysis temperature on the I2 adsorption performance of xCu@Zn-NC was investigated, and the result was shown in Figure 7a. As presented, the adsorption amount of the tested samples augmented with the increasing content of Cu at different pyrolysis temperatures. When the carbonization temperature increased from 400 to 1000 °C, the I2 adsorption performance of xCu@Zn-NC (x = 20% and 30%) initially increased and was followed by a subsequent decrease. When the Cu content was 30% and the pyrolysis temperature was 600 °C, the xCu@Zn-NC sample had the optimal adsorption capacity (1204.9 mg/g) for I2. Based on this, 600 °C was chosen as the pyrolysis temperature in subsequent research. Here, it should be noted that continuing to increase the Cu content in xCu@ZIF-8 would lead to a sharp decrease in the sample amount after carbonization. Therefore, considering the available sample amount and the adsorption performance, the Cu content ranged from 0 to 30%.
The equilibrium adsorption capacity of the as-made materials for I2 was studied by conducting adsorption isotherm experiments. As presented in Figure 7b, the equilibrium adsorption amount of all samples escalated significantly with the rise of the equilibrium concentration of I2. Furthermore, it could be further enhancement when Cu content increased. The saturated adsorption capacities of Zn-NC, 10%Cu@Zn-NC, 20%Cu@Zn-NC, and 30%Cu@Zn-NC for I2 were 206.4, 253.7, 725.6, and 1204.9 mg/g, respectively, much higher than that of the precursor (Figure S2). Obviously, the presence of Cu0 could significantly promote the adsorption performance of I2. This could be attributed to the addition of copper changed the surface charge of the adsorbent, as evidenced by the following charge density difference and Bader charge analysis.
The Langmuir, Freundlich, and Dubinin–Radushkevich (D-R) models were employed to analyze the isothermal uptake data of the synthesized adsorbent for I2. The Langmuir model assumed single-layer uniform adsorption, whereas the Freundlich model proposed multi-layer non-uniform distribution. The D-R model was suitable for determining whether the adsorption process was physical adsorption or chemical adsorption [53,54]. The nonlinear expressions of Langmuir (Equation (2)), Freundlich (Equation (3)), and D-R (Equation (4)) models could be described as follows:
q e = K L · q m · C e 1 + K L · C e
q e = K F · C e 1 / n
q e = q m · exp ( B · ( R · T · ln ( 1 + 1 C e ) 2 )
where qe and qm (mg/g) represented the equilibrium adsorption capacity at equilibrium concentration Ce (mg/L) and theoretical maximum adsorption capacity, respectively. KL denoted the Langmuir constant; KF and n represented the Freundlich constant. B represented the constant associated with adsorption energy. R was the gas constant (8.314 J/mol·K), and T was the solution temperature (K). The fitting results were displayed in Figure 7b and Table S3. The correlation coefficients (R2) derived from both Langmuir model and D-R model exceeded those from the Freundlich model, indicating that the I2 capture by the adsorbent followed both Langmuir and D-R model. Furthermore, the qm values (Table S3) of various samples determined by the Langmuir model and D-R model were mostly congruent with the isothermal adsorption data.
Beyond that, the average adsorption energy (E) of various samples was calculated by Equation (5):
E = 1 2 · B
As shown in Table S4, the average adsorption energy of Zn-NC, 10%Cu@Zn-NC, 20%Cu@Zn-NC, and 30%Cu@Zn-NC was 2.6, 4.0, 11.8, and 14.7 kJ/mol, respectively. The value of E could be used to estimate the type of adsorption process. If the value of E was lower than 8 kJ/mol, the type of adsorption could be defined as physisorption, whereas for E value > 8 kJ/mol, the adsorption type was chemical adsorption [55]. Obviously, the I2 adsorption behavior by 20%Cu@Zn-NC and 30%Cu@Zn-NC was mainly governed by the chemical adsorption mechanism.

3.2.2. Adsorption Kinetic Analysis

The adsorption kinetic investigation was conducted to ascertain the adsorption rate and equilibrium time of the xCu@Zn-NC samples for I2. In Figure 8a, the adsorption amount of I2 by xCu@Zn-NC composites increased rapidly within the first 25 min. This might be characterized as an instantaneous adsorption stage or an external surface adsorption mechanism, attributable to the presence of adequate active adsorption sites on the xCu@Zn-NC surface [56,57]. However, as the contact time extended, the adsorption rate began to decrease because of the occupation of adsorption sites and the decrease of I2 concentration, making it difficult for the adsorbent to adsorb I2. Subsequently, a prolonged adsorption phase occurred, ultimately achieving equilibrium in roughly 60, 60, 30, and 30 min, with saturation uptake amounts of 219.5, 273.2, 703.1, and 1173.2 mg/g for Zn-NC, 10%Cu@Zn-NC, 20%Cu@Zn-NC, and 30%Cu@Zn-NC, respectively. To enhance the comprehension of the adsorption rate, the color change in the solution was documented at various time intervals. It could be clearly observed from Figure 8b that the solution color changed from dark purple to clear within 45 min. The UV–visible absorption spectra further validated that nearly all I2 in solution could be eliminated by the 30%Cu@Zn-NC composite. In pursuit of a more comprehensive investigation, the adsorption capability and adsorption kinetic of 30%Cu@Zn-NC toward I2 were evaluated in relation to other adsorbents documented in prior literature. The results (Table 1) showed that the uptake amount of 30%Cu@Zn-NC for I2 was significantly greater than or comparable, while it showed relatively fast adsorption kinetic.
To further reveal the rate-controlling step during the I2 removal process, the kinetic adsorption data were examined using the pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetic models. The nonlinear expressions of the two models were as follows:
q t = q e ( 1 - e k 1 t )
q t = q e 2 k 2 t 1 + q e · k 2 · t
where qt denoted the adsorption capacity at time t (min); k1 and k2 represented the adsorption rate constants for the pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetic models, respectively. The fitting curves and the associated parameters were shown in Figure 8a and Table S5, respectively. According to the fitting curves and the R2 value, the adsorption kinetic data were more consistent with the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. Therefore, it could be inferred that the I2 adsorption behavior by xCu@Zn-NC was governed by the chemical adsorption mechanism, as evidenced by the following activation energy analysis.

3.2.3. The Activation Energy Analysis

To reveal the impact of the solution temperature on the adsorption efficacy and the change in intrinsic energy during the adsorption process, the experiments on I2 adsorption by 30%Cu@Zn-NC were performed at temperatures of 25, 35, 45, and 55 °C, respectively. The findings (Figure 9) displayed that the equilibrium uptake capacity of 30%Cu@Zn-NC increased from 1172.3 to 1317.8 mg/g as the temperature elevated from 25 to 55 °C. Moreover, the capture rate was also greatly improved. When the solution temperature was 55 °C, the adsorption equilibrium was attained within 15 min. The adsorption thermodynamic data were analyzed using linearity expression of pseudo-second-order kinetic model, with findings presented in Table S6. According to the fitting results, the pseudo-second-order kinetic model more accurately represented the I2 removal behavior.
The activation energy was verified according to the Arrhenius (Equation (8)):
ln K a d s = ln A E α R · T
where Eα represented the activation energy (kJ/mol); Kads was the adsorption rate constant; A was the Arrhenius constant. From the pseudo-second-order kinetic studies (Table S6), Ks was the adsorption rate constant, i.e., Kads. According to previous research, the activation energy of physical adsorption was lower than 4.0 kJ/mol, while the activation energy of chemical adsorption was 8.5~83.5 kJ/mol [61]. In this work, Eα was determined as 47.2 kJ/mol (Table S7), indicating that adsorption taken place through the chemical adsorption. Additionally, the positive value of Eα implied that increase in temperature favored the adsorption. Therefore, the endothermic characteristic of the adsorption process was indicated by the positive value.

3.2.4. Regeneration and Reusability Performance

The regeneration and reusability performance of the 30%Cu@Zn-NC sample were investigated, with the findings illustrated in Figure 10. Following regeneration, the adsorption capability of the adsorbent diminished by approximately 30%, potentially attributable to the incomplete decomposition of CuI during the regeneration process. After five cycles, the adsorption amount measured 389.0 mg/g, representing merely 33% of the initial amount.

3.3. Adsorption Mechanism Analysis

To achieve a comprehensive understanding of the I2 removal mechanism by the as-fabricated materials, XRD and XPS analyses were used to characterize the post-adsorbed composites (designated as I2-NC and I2-xCu@Zn-NC). Figure 11a demonstrated that the distinctive peaks corresponding to the CuI phase were detected for I2-xCu@Zn-NC at 2θ = 25.4°, 29.7, 42.2°, 61.3°, 67.6°, and 77.4° (JCPDS No. 06-0246), with the intensity of the diffraction peaks amplifying as the Cu proportion increased. Whereas the intensity of the Cu0 diffraction peak significantly decreased, indicating that Cu0 was crucial to the I2 elimination process. An XPS analysis was subsequently performed to ascertain the chemical structural information. The C 1s XPS spectra (Figure 11b) of I2-30%Cu@Zn-NC had two peaks, corresponding to the sp2 hybridized graphite carbon C-C/C=C (284.8 eV) and C=N/C-O (285.9 eV), respectively [29]. Compared with the pre-adsorption samples, the C=N/C-O (285.9 eV) peak showed a slight shift in energy levels (0.2 eV), which could be attributed to the interaction between C sites and I2 [11,62]. As for I2-Zn-NC sample, a new peak assigning to O-C=O appeared at binding energy of 289.1 eV. The O 1s XPS spectra (Figure 11c) of I2-30%Cu@Zn-NC revealed that the O 1s signal could be deconvoluted into three distinct peaks, representing C-O=C (532.8 eV), C-O (531.9 eV), and lattice oxygen (530.9 eV, Zn-O or/and Cu-O) [8,19]. The binding energy of the lattice oxygen peaks showed a shift after adsorption, which might be ascribed to the interaction between I2 and Zn or Cu sites, thus affecting the electron density, as illustrated in the following DFT analysis. The Zn 2p XPS spectra (Figure 11d) displayed two distinct peaks corresponding to Zn 2p3/2 and Zn 2p1/2, respectively. By comparing the characteristic peak binding energy of the samples before and after adsorption, it could be observed that the binding energy moved to a higher energy level post-adsorption. The reason might be that an inner sphere complex was formed between I and Zn sites (such as ZnI2) [38]. The Cu 2p XPS spectra (Figure 11e) of I2-30%Cu@Zn-NC displayed two characteristic peaks at binding energies of 952.3 and 932.7 eV, assigning to Cu 2p3/2 and Cu 2p1/2, respectively [29,38]. No satellite peaks were detected in the Cu 2p spectra, revealing the absence of Cu2+ species in I2-30%Cu@Zn-NC. And Cu was mainly found as Cu0 or/and Cu+ [8,24,63]. In conjunction with the XRD study (Figure 11a), it could be deduced that the Cu species in I2-30%Cu@Zn-NC existed as both Cu0 and Cu+ (CuI) states. According to the survey XPS scan (Figure S3a), two new distinct peaks appeared. The I 3d XPS spectra (Figure 11f) showed that the two peaks could be assigned to I 3d3/2 (631.1 eV) and I 3d5/2 (619.7 eV), respectively, confirming the adsorption of I2 on both samples [10,29].
To better understand the interaction between the as-fabricated composites and I2, the adsorption energy and geometric states were investigated on several modeled structures by conducting DFT calculations. The optimal configurations of I2 molecules on various surfaces along with the accompanying adsorption energy were shown in Figure 12, Figures S4 and S5. As for the non-Cu-introduced configuration, the main adsorption sites included Zn, C, and N (Figures S4 and S5). Among them, N and Zn sites exhibited a greater affinity toward I2, and the adsorption energy of I2 on NC (C site), NC (N site), and Zn-NC (Zn site) was −1.45, −3.05, and −3.26 eV (Figure S4), respectively. Moreover, the molecular distance (Table S8) of the I-Zn bond was 2.673 Å, shorter than that of the I-C (3.912 Å) and I-N bond (2.914 Å). This demonstrated that Zn had a stronger affinity for I2 than C and N sites. Upon the incorporation of Cu (Figure 12), the optimized models were denoted as ZnNC (Cu)-I2, ZnCuNC (Cu)-I2, CuNC (Cu)-I2, and ZnCuNC-I2. The adsorption energy of the I2 on the Cu-containing configuration was approximately twice as high as that of the non-Cu introduced, indicating more potent chemical interactions occurred on the surface. The batch adsorption experiment would verify this conclusion. Especially when Cu was present in the carbon matrix as Cu clusters, the adsorption energy for I2 was higher than that of a single Cu site (ZnCuNC-I2). Meanwhile, by comparing the bond lengths of I-Cu in different models, the I-Cu bond length in ZnCuNC (Cu)-I2 was 2.5 Å (Table S8), shorter than in other modeled structures. From the aforementioned findings, we could infer that Cu clusters had a strong interaction with I2. The I-I bond could be cleaved at a specific density of the Cu sites, resulting in each iodine molecule being connected to two Cu sites. Chibani et al. and Chen et al. have obtained analogous results [10,40].
To intuitively demonstrate the charge density difference and electron transfer between the adsorbent and I2, the charge density difference and the Bader charge calculation analysis were conducted (Figure 12 and Table S9). The charge density difference and the Bader charge data showed that the iodine atoms in Cu incorporation models involved more charge transfer than the iodine atoms in non-Cu-introduced models or Cu existing in the form of Cu-Nx. The aforementioned indicated that adsorption onto the Cu cluster arrangement included significant charge transfer, implying a strong affinity due to chemical interactions [64].
According to the above results, the elimination mechanism of xCu@Zn-NC toward I2 was mostly attributed to the robust chemical affinity of Cu0 to I2 (2Cu + I2 = 2CuI). In this process, the I-I bond could be cleaved, and each iodine atom could bond with Cu site and eventually form a stable CuI phase [6,16]. Additionally, Zn species might also act as the capture sites for I2 by forming an inner sphere complex (such as ZnI2) [38].

4. Conclusions

To summarize, this work presented the fabrication of xCu@Zn-NC composites by physical ball milling and pyrolysis process using inorganic Cu salts as raw sources and ZIF-8 as a precursor. The batch adsorption findings indicated that pyrolysis temperature, Cu ratio, and adsorption ambient temperature influenced the removal efficiency of the resulting materials. At a pyrolysis temperature of 600 °C and a Cu ratio of 30%, the sample exhibited a substantial I2 adsorption capacity of 1204.9 mg/g and an accelerated removal rate. Moreover, the adsorption amount and the equilibrium time could be further optimized when the I2-cyclohexane solution temperature was 55 °C. The exceptional I2 adsorption performance of the obtained materials was mainly ascribed to the strong chemical affinity of Cu0 nanoparticles for I2, as evidenced by analyzing the pre-/post-adsorbed materials, batch adsorption, and DFT calculation findings. The aforementioned results implied that the xCu@Zn-NC was an effective material for the removal of iodine from solutions. Prospectively, xCu@Zn-NC adsorbents were the potential candidate for efficient iodine removal form wastewater.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano15020105/s1: Figure S1: XRD patterns of Zn-NC and xCu@Zn-NC samples (10°–35°); Figure S2: The adsorption capacity of ZIF-8 and xCu@ZIF-8; Figure S3: XPS spectra of I2-Zn-NC and I2-30%Cu@Zn-NC, (a) survey spectra, (b) N 1s; Figure S4: Configuration and charge density difference of I2 adsorption on different models of Zn-NC; Figure S5: Sites distribution of various configuration, (a) NC-I2, (b) ZnNC-I2, (c) CuNC(Cu)-I2, (d) ZnCuNC(Cu)-I2, (e) ZnNC(Cu)-I2, (f) ZnCu-NC-I2; Table S1: BET surface aera, pore volume and average pore size of Zn-NC and xCu@Zn-NC samples; Table S2: Element content in 30%Cu@Zn-NC sample; Table S3: Fitting parameters of Langmuir, Freundlich and D-R isotherm models; Table S4: The average adsorption energy (E) of the adsorbent; Table S5: Kinetic parameters for the adsorption of I2 by xCu@Zn-NC nanocomposites; Table S6: Kinetic parameters for the adsorption of I2 by 30%Cu@Zn-NC nanocomposites in different solution temperature; Table S7: Fitting parameters of Arrhenius equation; Table S8: The bond length between I and the different adsorption sites; Table S9: Bader charge analysis.

Author Contributions

J.C. (Jiuyu Chen): conceptualization, investigation, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, supervision, funding acquisition; C.G.: investigation, writing—original draft preparation, formal analysis. J.C. (Jingwen Chen): conceptualization, resources, writing—review and editing, and project administration. F.L.: writing—review and editing, formal analysis, funding acquisition; Z.L.: investigation, formal analysis, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors are grateful to the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 52300193, and 52300224), The Fourth Batch of Changzhou City Leading Innovative Talents Introduction and Cultivation Project in 2023 (Basic Research Innovation Category) (No. CQ20230107), Suzhou key core technology research project (No. SNG2023014), Jiangsu Province Young Scientific and Technological Talents Promotion Plan in 2024 (No. JSTJ-2024-255) for financial support.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article. The data presented in this study are available.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Zhang, M.; Samanta, J.; Atterberry, B.; Staples, R.; Rossini, A.; Ke, C. A crosslinked ionic organic framework for efficient iodine and iodide remediation in water. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2022, 61, e202214189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Changani, Z.; Razmjou, A.; Taheri-Kafrani, A.; Warkiani, M.; Asadnia, M. Surface modification of polypropylene membrane for the removal of iodine using polydopamine chemistry. Chemosphere 2020, 249, 126079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yao, Y.; Yin, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wei, F.; Hu, H.; Tang, Y.; Wang, S. Fe, Cu-coordinated ZIF-derived bimetal encapsulated N-doped carbon nanotube for efficient remediation of various aqueous pollutants. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 426, 131801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhou, W.; Li, A.; Zhou, M.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; He, Q. Nonporous amorphous superadsorbents for highly effective and selective adsorption of iodine in water. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 5388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Liu, B.; Ren, X.; Chen, L.; Ma, X.; Chen, Q.; Sun, Q.; Zhang, L.; Si, P.; Ci, L. High efficient adsorption and storage of iodine on S, N co-doped graphene aerogel. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 373, 705–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Luo, S.; Yan, Q.; Wang, S.; Hu, H.; Xiao, S.; Su, X.; Xu, H.; Gao, Y. Conjugated microporous polymers based on octet and tetratopic linkers for efficient iodine capture. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 46408–46416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sen, A.; Sharma, S.; Dutta, S.; Shirolkar, M.M.; Dam, G.K.; Let, S.; Ghosh, S.K. Functionalized ionic porous organic polymers exhibiting high iodine uptake from both the vapor and aqueous medium. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 34188–34196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Miensah, E.D.; Kokuloku, L.T.; Gu, A.; Chen, K.; Wang, P.; Gong, C.; Mao, P.; Chen, K.; Jiao, Y.; Yang, Y. In situ modification of JUC-160-derived carbon with Cu/ZnO nanoparticles for efficient capture and reversible storage of radioiodine. Surf. Interfaces 2022, 32, 102160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nandanwar, S.U.; Coldsnow, K.; Utgikar, V.; Sabharwall, P.; Aston, D.E. Capture of harmful radioactive contaminants from off-gas stream using porous solid sorbents for clean environment-A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 306, 369–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, S.; Zeng, Y.; Zhang, A.; Song, Y.; Ni, Y.; Li, J.; Chi, F.; Xiao, C. Efficient capture of radioactive iodine by ZIF-8 derived porous carbon. J. Environ. Radioact. 2022, 249, 106895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Liu, X.; Yuan, H.; Zheng, Q.; Huang, B.; Liao, F.; Gao, H.; Fu, H.; Zhang, J.; Liao, Y. Understanding the adsorption sites on nitrogen- and oxygen-doped carbon nanotubes for iodine uptake. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2023, 629, 157387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ma, J.; Xu, S.; Wang, X.; Zhang, M.; Qu, Y.; Cao, Q.; Jia, H.; Xu, J.; Wang, X. Biomass derived porous carbon for efficient iodine adsorption from vapor and solution. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 347, 127613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kamran, U.; Bhatti, H.N.; Noreen, S.; Tahir, M.A.; Park, S.J. Chemically modified sugarcane bagasse-based biocomposites for efficient removal of acid red 1 dye: Kinetics, isotherms, thermodynamics, and desorption studies. Chemosphere 2022, 291, 132796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, X.; Meng, R.; Zhao, S.; Jing, Z.; Jin, Y.; Zhang, J.; Pi, X.; Du, Q.; Chen, L.; Li, Y. Efficient adsorption of radioactive iodine by covalent organic framework/chitosan aerogel. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 260, 129690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, P.; Xu, Q.; Li, Z.P.; Jiang, W.M.; Jiang, Q.H.; Jiang, D.L. Exceptional iodine capture in 2D covalent organic frameworks. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1801991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xu, G.; Lin, J.; Gao, X.; Yu, C.; Tang, C.; Huang, Y. Modification of boron nitride aerogels with APTES for enhanced iodine capture performance. Ceram. Int. 2024, 50, 27111–27119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhou, X.; Jin, H.; Yun, S.; Huang, W.; Mao, P.; Chen, J.; Yang, Y. A novel Cu nanoporous aerogel for high-efficient immobilization of iodide in water. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 454, 140217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhou, X.; Jin, H.; Gu, A.; Chen, K.; Liu, Y.; Yun, S.; Mao, P.; Chen, J.; Yang, Y. Monolithic Cu/Al2O3-palygorskite composite aerogel for high-efficiency iodine elimination in a multimedia environment. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2024, 366, 112963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yu, R.; Li, Q.; Zhang, T.; Li, Z.; Xia, L. Zn, O Co-adsorption based on MOF-5 for efficient capture of radioactive iodine. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot. 2023, 174, 770–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kamran, U.; Park, S.J. Hybrid biochar supported transition metal doped MnO2 composites: Efficient contenders for lithium adsorption and recovery from aqueous solutions. Desalination Water Treat. 2022, 522, 115387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, M.; Wang, C.; Liu, J.; Rong, F.; He, L.; Lou, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Du, M. Efficient Ag/Ag2O-doped cobalt metallo-covalent organic framework electrocatalysts for rechargeable Zinc-Air battery. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 5872–5883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, X.; Li, M.; Zhang, J.; He, X.; Crittenden, J.C.; Zhang, W. Silver ion-exchanged anionic metal–organic frameworks for iodine adsorption: Silver species evolution from ions to nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2023, 6, 7206–7217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Qi, B.; Liu, Y.; Zheng, T.; Gao, Q.; Yan, X.; Jiao, Y.; Yang, Y. Highly efficient capture of iodine by Cu/MIL-101. J. Solid State Chem. 2018, 258, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. He, X.; Chen, L.; Xiao, X.; Gan, Y.; Yu, J.P.; Luo, J.; Dan, H.; Wang, Y.; Ding, Y.; Duan, T. Improved utilization of Cu0 for efficient adsorption of iodine in gas and solution by mesoporous Cu0-SBA-15 via solvothermal reduction method. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 462, 142175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, Z.; Chen, K.; Gu, A.; Zhou, X.; Wang, P.; Gong, C.; Mao, P.; Jiao, Y.; Chen, K.; Lu, J.; et al. Adsorption performance study of bismuth-doped ZIF-8 composites on radioactive iodine in the vapor and liquid phases. J. Solid State Chem. 2023, 325, 124186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jung, Y.E.; Yang, J.H.; Yim, M.S. Investigation of bismuth-based metal-organic frameworks for effective capture and immobilization of radioiodine gas. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 467, 133777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kamran, U.; Lee, S.; Rhee, K.Y.; Park, S.J. Rice husk valorization into sustainable Ni@TiO2/biochar nanocomposite for highly selective Pb (II) ions removal from an aqueous media. Chemosphere 2023, 323, 138210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhou, L.; Chen, K.; Dai, X.; Qiao, T.; Liu, H.; Lu, J.; Wang, P.; Gong, C.; Deng, S.; Xia, M.; et al. Efficient elimination of trace iodide ions from medical wastewater by Cu/Cu2O@AC composites. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2024, 333, 4955–4969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, J.; Wang, P.; Gong, C.; Sun, Y.; Zhu, B.; Yang, Y.; Liu, F. Bimetal ZIFs-derived Cu0 embedded in nitrogen-doped carbon framework activation of molecular oxygen for efficient iodide elimination. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 112235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, M.; Wang, X.; Zhang, J.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, W. Cu-loaded MOF-303 for iodine adsorption: The roles of Cu species and pyrazole ligands. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2023, 619, 156819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Luan, J.; Li, J.; Duan, W.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Y.; Guo, F.; Li, W. Fabrication of a family of Cu-based materials derived from a Cu-organic framework for enhanced iodine capture. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2024, 167, 112783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, S.; Gao, X.; Li, P.; Zhang, X.; Wang, M.; Xiao, S.; Zhao, X. Copper nanoparticles embedded flexible graphene aerogel for effective capture of iodine vapor. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2024, 379, 113298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, J.; Wang, M.; Zhao, X.; Li, Z.; Niu, Y.; Wang, S.; Sun, Q. Efficient iodine removal by porous biochar-Confined nano-Cu2O/Cu0: Rapid and selective adsorption of iodide and iodate ions. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, Y.; Yu, X.; Hou, Y.; Liu, C.; Xie, G.; Chen, X. Current research status of MOF materials for catalysis applications. Mol. Catal. 2024, 555, 113851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, Y.; Guo, Q.; Ding, Z.; Jiang, H.; Yang, H.; Du, W.; Zheng, Y.; Huo, K.; Shaw, L.L. MOFs-based materials for solid-state hydrogen storage: Strategies and perspectives. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 485, 149665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wu, Y.; Guo, Y.; Su, R.; Ma, X.; Wu, Q.; Zeng, Z.; Li, L.; Yao, X.; Wang, S. Hierarchical porous carbon with an ultrahigh surface area for high-efficient iodine capture: Insights into adsorption mechanisms through experiments, simulations and modeling. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 303, 122237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. He, L.; Chen, L.; Dong, X.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, M.; Dai, X.; Liu, X.J.; Lin, P.; Li, K.F.; Chen, C.; et al. A nitrogen-rich covalent organic framework for simultaneous dynamic capture of iodine and methyl iodide. Chem 2021, 7, 699–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, J.; Gu, A.; Miensah, E.D.; Liu, Y.; Wang, P.; Mao, P.; Gong, C.; Jiao, Y.; Chen, K.; Yang, Y. Cu-Zn bimetal ZIFs derived nanowhisker zero-valent copper decorated ZnO nanocomposites induced oxygen activation for high-efficiency iodide elimination. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 416, 126097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yang, H.; Xie, A.; Tang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Kong, L.; Song, P.; Sun, Y.; Yang, X.; Wan, P. Fe-ZIF8 coating Cu foil derived Carbon as a pH-universal electrocatalyst for efficient oxygen reduction reaction. Chem. Eur. J. 2021, 28, 21506010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Wang, Z.; He, Y.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, L.; Liu, B.; Zhang, Y.K.; Duan, T. Natural porous wood decorated with ZIF-8 for high efficient iodine capture. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2021, 258, 123964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jing, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, L.; Liu, Y.; Yu, B.; Yang, C. MOF-derived Co, Fe, and Ni co-doped N-enriched hollow carbon as e fficient electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 397, 125539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Schejn, A.; Balan, L.; Falk, V.; Aranda, L.; Medjahdi, G.; Schneider, R. Controlling ZIF-8 nano- and microcrystal formation and reactivity through zinc salt variations. Cryst. Eng. Comm. 2014, 16, 4493–4500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mohammadi, A.; Nakhaei Pour, A. Triethylenetetramine-impregnated ZIF-8 nanoparticles for CO2 adsorption. J. CO2 Util. 2023, 69, 102424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jiang, X.; Wu, K.; Shao, L.; Shui, M.; Lin, X.; Lao, M.; Long, N.; Ren, Y.; Shu, J. Lithium storage mechanism in superior high capacity copper nitrate hydrate anode material. J. Power Sources 2014, 260, 218–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhu, H.; Dai, Y.; Di, S.; Tian, L.; Wang, F.; Wang, Z.; Lu, Y. Bimetallic ZIF-based PtCuCo/NC electrocatalyst Pt supported with an N-doped porous carbon for oxygen reduction reaction in PEM fuel cells. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2023, 6, 1575–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hu, C.; Hu, X.; Li, R.; Xing, Y. MOF derived ZnO/C nanocomposite with enhanced adsorption capacity and photocatalytic performance under sunlight. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 385, 121599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Liu, L.; Chen, L.; Thummavichai, K.; Ye, Z.; Wang, Y.; Fujita, T.; Wang, X. Amino-functionalized MOF-on-MOF architectural nanocomplexes composed for radioactive-iodine efficient adsorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 474, 145858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, Z.; Liu, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, J. Bimetallic Fe-Cu-based metal-organic frameworks as efficient adsorbents for gaseous elemental mercury removal. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 60, 781–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jin, Y.; Wu, J.; Wang, J.; Fan, Y.; Zhang, S.; Ma, N.; Dai, W. Highly efficient capture of benzothiophene with a novel water-resistant-bimetallic Cu-ZIF-8 material. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2020, 503, 119412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wei, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, T.; Zhang, G.; Yang, L.; He, C.; Xiong, Z.; Pan, Z.; Lai, B. N, S co-doped porous carbon to accelerate Fe3+/Fe2+ redox cycle for peroxymonosulfate activation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 328, 125080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Luo, G.; Deng, Y.; Zhang, X.P.; Zou, R.; Sun, W.; Li, B.; Sun, B.; Wang, Y.; Li, G. A ZIF-8 derived nitrogen-doped porous carbon and nitrogen-doped graphene nanocomposite modified electrode for simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid, dopamine and uric acid. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 16819–16828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sun, T.; Levin, B.D.A.; Guzman, J.J.L.; Enders, A.; Muller, D.A.; Angenent, L.T.; Lehmann, J. Rapid electron transfer by the carbon matrix in natural pyrogenic carbon. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Demiral, H.; Güngör, C. Adsorption of copper(II) from aqueous solutions on activated carbon prepared from grape bagasse. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 124, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Karthik, R.; Meenakshi, S. Removal of Pb(II) and Cd(II) ions from aqueous solution using polyaniline grafted chitosan. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 263, 168–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Pezoti, O.; Cazetta, A.L.; Bedin, K.C.; Souza, L.S.; Martins, A.C.; Silva, T.L.; Santos Júnior, O.O.; Visentainer, J.V.; Almeida, V.C. NaOH-activated carbon of high surface area produced from guava seeds as a high-efficiency adsorbent for amoxicillin removal: Kinetic, isotherm and thermodynamic studies. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 288, 778–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yun, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Z.; Deng, Y. Ni and Fe nanoparticles, alloy and Ni/Fe-Nx coordination co-boost the catalytic activity of the carbon-based catalyst for triiodide reduction and hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 615, 501–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Han, T.; Wang, L.; Potgieter, J.H. ZIF-11 derived nanoporous carbons with ultrahigh uptakes for capture and reversible storage of volatile iodine. J. Solid State Chem. 2020, 282, 121108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wang, Y.; Zhang, X. Convenient synthesis of novel Cu2O/Cu@C/SiO2 composite from rice-husk for efficient iodine gas capture. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2024, 333, 4377–4386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yue, T.C.; Yin, L.; Huang, J.B.; Wang, L.L.; Wang, D.Z. Assembly of a three-dimensional Cu-MOF for efficient Fenton-like degradation of dyes and iodine capture. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2024, 38, e7629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yu, Q.; Jiang, X.; Cheng, Z.; Liao, Y.; Duan, M. Porous ZIF-8@polyacrylonitrile composite beads for iodine capture. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 30259–30269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Li, Q.; Chai, L.; Yang, Z.; Wang, Q. Kinetics and thermodynamics of Pb(II) adsorption onto modified spent grain from aqueous solutions. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 255, 4298–4303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Fu, H.; Tang, Y.; Yuan, Q.; Chang, J.; Liao, F.; Zhang, J.; Gao, H.; Yang, Y.; Liao, Y. Understanding iodine adsorption sites on monolithic N/O co-doped carbon fibers with scaffolding structure. Fuel 2024, 371, 132035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhao, Q.; Zhu, L.; Lin, G.H.; Chen, G.Y.; Liu, B.; Zhang, L.; Duan, T.; Lei, J.H. Controllable Synthesis of Porous Cu-BTC@polymer Composite Beads for Iodine Capture. ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces 2019, 11, 42635–42645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Tang, Z.; Xie, D.; Li, S.; Yang, X. Novel hydrophobic hierarchical porous carbon from sewage sludge for the efficient capture of gaseous iodine. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 335, 126214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the synthesis procedure of xCu@Zn-NC samples.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the synthesis procedure of xCu@Zn-NC samples.
Nanomaterials 15 00105 g001
Figure 2. (ac) SEM images of ZIF-8 (a), 20%Cu@ZIF-8 (b), and 30%Cu@ZIF-8 (c); (di) SEM images of Zn-NC (d,g), 20%Cu@Zn-NC (e,h), and 30%Cu@Zn-NC (f,i) in different magnifications.
Figure 2. (ac) SEM images of ZIF-8 (a), 20%Cu@ZIF-8 (b), and 30%Cu@ZIF-8 (c); (di) SEM images of Zn-NC (d,g), 20%Cu@Zn-NC (e,h), and 30%Cu@Zn-NC (f,i) in different magnifications.
Nanomaterials 15 00105 g002
Figure 3. N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms (a) and pore size distributions (b) of xCu@Zn-NC samples. (Gray area: the zoom position in the diagram).
Figure 3. N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms (a) and pore size distributions (b) of xCu@Zn-NC samples. (Gray area: the zoom position in the diagram).
Nanomaterials 15 00105 g003
Figure 4. XRD patterns of xCu@ZIF-8 (a) and xCu@Zn-NC (b).
Figure 4. XRD patterns of xCu@ZIF-8 (a) and xCu@Zn-NC (b).
Nanomaterials 15 00105 g004
Figure 5. XPS patterns of Zn-NC and 30%Cu@Zn-NC. (a) Survey spectra; (b) Zn 2p spectra; (c) C 1s spectra; (d) N 1s spectra; (e) O 1s spectra; (f) Cu 2p spectra.
Figure 5. XPS patterns of Zn-NC and 30%Cu@Zn-NC. (a) Survey spectra; (b) Zn 2p spectra; (c) C 1s spectra; (d) N 1s spectra; (e) O 1s spectra; (f) Cu 2p spectra.
Nanomaterials 15 00105 g005
Figure 6. FT-IR spectra of xCu@Zn-NC samples.
Figure 6. FT-IR spectra of xCu@Zn-NC samples.
Nanomaterials 15 00105 g006
Figure 7. (a) The effect of Cu content and pyrolysis temperature on the I2 adsorption capacity; (b) adsorption isotherms of various samples for I2.
Figure 7. (a) The effect of Cu content and pyrolysis temperature on the I2 adsorption capacity; (b) adsorption isotherms of various samples for I2.
Nanomaterials 15 00105 g007
Figure 8. (a) Kinetic adsorption of I2 by xCu@Zn-NC samples, (b) UV–vis absorption spectra of I2 solution (900 mg/L) in different contact time.
Figure 8. (a) Kinetic adsorption of I2 by xCu@Zn-NC samples, (b) UV–vis absorption spectra of I2 solution (900 mg/L) in different contact time.
Nanomaterials 15 00105 g008
Figure 9. The effect of temperature on the I2 adsorption capacity of 30%Cu@Zn-NC sample. (Inset: Plot of ln Kads versus 1/T).
Figure 9. The effect of temperature on the I2 adsorption capacity of 30%Cu@Zn-NC sample. (Inset: Plot of ln Kads versus 1/T).
Nanomaterials 15 00105 g009
Figure 10. Reusability performance of 30%Cu@Zn-NC sample toward I2.
Figure 10. Reusability performance of 30%Cu@Zn-NC sample toward I2.
Nanomaterials 15 00105 g010
Figure 11. (a) XRD patterns of I2-NC and I2-x%Cu@Zn-NC. (bf) XPS patterns of I2-Zn-NC and I2-30%Cu@Zn-NC. (b) C 1s spectra, (c) O 1s spectra, (d) Zn 2p spectra, (e) Cu 2p spectra, (f) I 3d spectra.
Figure 11. (a) XRD patterns of I2-NC and I2-x%Cu@Zn-NC. (bf) XPS patterns of I2-Zn-NC and I2-30%Cu@Zn-NC. (b) C 1s spectra, (c) O 1s spectra, (d) Zn 2p spectra, (e) Cu 2p spectra, (f) I 3d spectra.
Nanomaterials 15 00105 g011
Figure 12. Configuration and charge density difference of I2 adsorption on different models of Cu@Zn-NC.
Figure 12. Configuration and charge density difference of I2 adsorption on different models of Cu@Zn-NC.
Nanomaterials 15 00105 g012
Table 1. Comparison of I2 adsorption performance of 30%Cu@Zn-NC with other adsorbents reported in previous literature.
Table 1. Comparison of I2 adsorption performance of 30%Cu@Zn-NC with other adsorbents reported in previous literature.
AdsorbentIodine StateT (°C)Adsorption Capacity (mg/g)Equilibration Time (h)Reference
Cu/MIL-101Gas/I275432.024[23]
Cu0-SBA-15Cyclohexane/I2RT842.08[24]
Cu/ZnO@CCyclohexane/I2251280.115[8]
Cu-MOFCyclohexane/I2RT971.010[31]
Cu2O/Cu@C/SiO2Gas/I2150820.02[58]
XJU-1Cyclohexane/I2RT368.048[59]
ZIF-8@polyacrylonitrileCyclohexane/I2RT643.024[60]
ZIF-8@woodGas/I2751091.04.1[40]
CZIF-1000Cyclohexane/I2RT790.88[10]
30%Cu@Zn-NCCyclohexane/I2RT1204.90.5This work
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, J.; Gao, C.; Chen, J.; Liu, F.; Liu, Z. Cu0-Functionalized, ZIF-8-Derived, Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Composites for Efficient Iodine Elimination in Solution. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15020105

AMA Style

Chen J, Gao C, Chen J, Liu F, Liu Z. Cu0-Functionalized, ZIF-8-Derived, Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Composites for Efficient Iodine Elimination in Solution. Nanomaterials. 2025; 15(2):105. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15020105

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Jiuyu, Chensheng Gao, Jingwen Chen, Fei Liu, and Zhiwen Liu. 2025. "Cu0-Functionalized, ZIF-8-Derived, Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Composites for Efficient Iodine Elimination in Solution" Nanomaterials 15, no. 2: 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15020105

APA Style

Chen, J., Gao, C., Chen, J., Liu, F., & Liu, Z. (2025). Cu0-Functionalized, ZIF-8-Derived, Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Composites for Efficient Iodine Elimination in Solution. Nanomaterials, 15(2), 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15020105

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop