Next Article in Journal
Interface Thermal Resistance in Heterostructures of Micro–Nano Power Devices: Current Status and Future Challenges
Previous Article in Journal
DFT-Based Functionalization of Graphene with Lithium-Modified Groups for Enhanced Hydrogen Detection: Thermodynamic, Electronic, and Spectroscopic Properties
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phase Evolution and Mechanical Performance of Zirconia Ceramics Synthesized Under High Temperature and High Pressure

Institute of High Pressure Physics, School of Physical Scientific and Technology, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2025, 15(16), 1235; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15161235
Submission received: 31 May 2025 / Revised: 29 June 2025 / Accepted: 3 July 2025 / Published: 13 August 2025

Abstract

Achieving simultaneous enhancement of Vickers hardness and fracture toughness remains a critical challenge in designing oxide ceramic materials due to their partially antagonistic nature. In this study, we address this trade-off by tailoring the microstructure of zirconia (ZrO2) ceramics through Y2O3 doping and high-pressure high-temperature (HPHT) sintering. Nanostructured composites were synthesized using 50 nm monoclinic ZrO2 and varying Y2O3 contents (3, 5, and 7 mol%) under 5 GPa at temperatures ranging from 400 to 2000 °C. Among them, 3 mol% Y2O3-doped zirconia (3Y-PSZ) sintered at 1200 °C achieved a well-balanced mechanical performance, with a Vickers hardness of 11.6 GPa and a fracture toughness of 9.26 MPa·m1/2. These results demonstrate that it is feasible to retain a high hardness while significantly enhancing toughness by controlling phase composition and grain refinement under HPHT conditions. This work offers valuable insights into microstructural optimization strategies for zirconia-based ceramics aiming to overcome the conventional hardness–toughness trade-off.

1. Introduction

ZrO2 has garnered extensive attention across various fields, including bioceramics, cutting tools, refractories, and solid oxide fuel cells, owing to its outstanding mechanical properties and chemical stability [1,2,3,4]. At ambient conditions, ZrO2 adopts the monoclinic (m) phase, while the tetragonal (t) and cubic (c) phases are stable only at elevated temperatures [5,6,7]. The m-phase exhibits inferior toughness and strength, whereas the t- and c-phase display enhanced mechanical performance. However, the transformation from the t- to m-phase during cooling leads to a volumetric expansion (~3–5%), causing microcracks and catastrophic material failure [8]. To address this challenge, stabilizing oxides such as Y2O3, CeO2, MgO, and CaO are introduced to promote the metastable retention of t- and c-phase, facilitating transformation toughening [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Among these, yttria-stabilized zirconia (Y-PSZ) stands out due to its favorable combination of hardness, fracture toughness, and biocompatibility, which has led to its widespread use in dental restorations, orthopedic implants, and advanced ceramic cutting tools [17]. For instance, Alhotan et al. utilized a lithography-based ceramic manufacturing process to fabricate 3D-printed 3Y-TZP materials, achieving a fracture toughness of 6.07 MPa∙m1/2 and a hardness of 14.2 GPa after multistep thermal treatments [18]. Similarly, Tovar-Vargas et al. reported that a composite of 10 mol% Ce-TZP and 1 mol% CaO sintered at 1450 °C under atmospheric pressure achieved a fracture toughness of 6.5 MPa∙m1/2 and hardness up to 9.9 GPa [19].
Despite the significant progress in stabilizing ZrO2, achieving a favorable balance between high hardness and enhanced fracture toughness remains a critical scientific challenge. Various strategies have been proposed to overcome this trade-off, including the optimization of dopant content, grain size refinement, the incorporation of second-phase reinforcements (e.g., Al2O3, SiC), and the adoption of advanced sintering techniques. HPHT sintering has emerged as a particularly effective approach for enhancing mechanical performance. Elevated pressure can suppress long-range atomic diffusion and inhibit grain coarsening, leading to an increase in grain boundary density and a reduction in dislocation mobility. This in turn improves yield strength, tensile strength, and fracture toughness [20,21]. Moreover, the application of high pressure facilitates densification, thereby further contributing to the enhancement of mechanical properties [22,23].
Previous studies have shown that high pressure significantly accelerates the phase transition kinetics of ZrO2, thereby enhancing its structural evolution [24,25]. For example, Vahldiek et al. synthesized the t-phase at 1.5–2 GPa and 1200–1700 °C [26], while Kulcinski demonstrated that the t-phase could be formed directly from the m-phase at room temperature under pressures exceeding 3.7 GPa, although the transformation was entirely reversible upon pressure release [27]. Despite advances in understanding ZrO2’s phase transitions under pressure, limited attention has been paid to simultaneously optimizing both hardness and fracture toughness.
To bridge this gap, this study systematically investigates the effects of varying Y2O3 content (3, 5, and 7 mol%) and sintering temperatures (400–2000 °C) under 5 GPa on the microstructure and mechanical properties of ZrO2 ceramics. A ZrO2 bulk ceramic exhibiting maximized fracture toughness without compromising hardness was successfully achieved by sintering at 1200 °C with 3 mol% Y2O3 doping. This work provides new insights into the design of high-performance ZrO2-based ceramics under high-pressure conditions and offers a theoretical foundation for the development and application of advanced ceramic materials.

2. Materials and Methods

The ZrO2 ceramics were consolidated via HPHT sintering using a Chinese domestic large-volume cubic press (GY560, SPD-6 × 2700 kN, Guilin Guiye Machinery Co., Ltd., Guilin, China) under a constant pressure of 5 GPa and within a temperature range of 400–2000 °C. m-ZrO2 nanopowders with an average particle size of ~50 nm (purity ≥ 99.99%, Beijing Innochem Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) and Y2O3 powders (purity ≥ 99.99%, Beijing Innochem Technology Co., Ltd.) were used as starting materials. Y2O3 was added to the ZrO2 powder in stoichiometric amounts to achieve doping levels of 3, 5, and 7 mol%. The well-mixed powder was uniaxially pre-pressed under 10 MPa into cylindrical compacts with a diameter of 6 mm, which were then loaded into boron nitride (BN) ceramic tubes for sintering. The heating assembly consisted of a BN tube serving as a high-pressure liner, a graphite tube as the heating element, and pyrophyllite as the pressure-transmitting medium (all purchased from Zibo Jingyi Ceramics Co., Ltd., China, Zibo, China). Prior to assembly, all components were baked at 100 °C for 12 h to remove residual moisture. A schematic diagram of the assembly setup is shown in Figure 1a, while the experimental pressure–temperature profile is illustrated in Figure 1b. The pressure was ramped to 5 GPa within 20 min, and the temperature was raised to the target value over another 20 min, followed by a 10-min dwell time at the set temperature. The experimental synthetic pressure was based on the high-pressure phase transformation point of Bi, Ba, and Tl, and the chamber temperature was calibrated by a high-pressure in situ resistance measurement and monitored using Pt-30%Rh/Pt-6%Rh (0–1800 °C) and W-Re3/25 (1800–2300 °C) thermocouples.
Phase composition was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD, D8 ADVANCE, Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany, Cu-Kα radiation, and λ = 0.15418 nm). Raman spectra were obtained using the Monovista CRS+ (Monovista CRS+, Spectros)equipped with a 532 nm laser. Microstructure and grain morphology were examined using the Scanning Electron Microscope (FE-SEM, SU-70, Hitachi High-Technologies, Tokyo, Japan). Grain size distributions were determined by analyzing 100 g from SEM images. Vickers hardness (HV) was measured under a load of 19.6 N with a dwell time of 10 s using an HMAS-D tester (Shanghai Microcre Light-Mach Tech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), while fracture toughness was calculated based on crack lengths obtained under higher loads (>19.6 N) using a KB5 tester (KB Prüftechnik, Hochdorf-Assenheim, Germany). Young’s modulus was determined using a nanoindenter (G200, KLA Corporation, Chandler, AZ, USA) under a maximum load of 1000 mN. The HV [14] and fracture toughness (KIC) [28] were calculated using the corresponding standard equations:
H V = 1885.4 P d 2
K I C = 0.004985 E H V 1 / 2 P c 3 / 2
where P is the applied load (Kg), d is the average diagonal length (mm) of the indentation, c is the average length (mm) of the radial cracks, and E (230 GPa) is the elastic modulus of the ZrO2-based ceramic composites.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structure and Surface Morphology

Figure 2 presents the XRD patterns of 3Y-PSZ synthesized under 5 GPa at various temperatures. As shown in Figure 2a, with the increasing sintering temperature from 400 °C to 2000 °C, the intensities of the t- and c-phase peaks gradually increased, while the m-phase peaks weakened, suggesting a progressive phase transformation from the m-phase to the t- and c-phase. When 3Y-PSZ is sintered above 1000 °C, Y3+ ions are likely to fully dissolve into the ZrO2 lattice, stabilizing either the t- or c-phase. As a result, the absence of distinct Y2O3 diffraction peaks in the XRD pattern is plausible. A localized enlargement of the 26–34° region, displayed in Figure 2b, shows that the weak t-phase peaks [29] appeared at 2θ ≈ 30.3° after 800 °C. Between 800 °C and 1500 °C, the t-phase fraction steadily increased from 31% to 62%, as calculated by the ratio of integrated intensities of selected reflections corresponding to the m-, t-, and c-phases, respectively. After 1700 °C, a new diffraction peak corresponding to the (311) plane of the c-phase emerged (Figure 2c), indicating the coexistence of m-, t-, and c-phase. At 2000 °C, the combined fraction of t- and c-phase increased significantly, with the c-phase becoming more dominant and the total high-symmetry phase content (t + c) reaching approximately 70%. Table 1 summarizes the sintering temperature, pressure, holding time, phase composition, and phase fractions for the 3Y-PSZ samples.
As shown in Figure 3, the XRD results for 5 mol% and 7 mol% Y-PSZ samples (5Y-PSZ, 7Y-PSZ) reveal similar phase evolution trends. Notably, the t-phase first appeared at 400 °C in both samples, indicating that higher Y2O3 content lowers the onset temperature for phase stabilization. By 1500 °C, m-phase peaks disappeared entirely, indicating a complete transformation into t- and c-phases. This further verifies that the increasing Y2O3 concentration effectively reduces the temperature required for the m- to c-phase transition. The progressive enhancement of t- and c-phase peaks, along with the gradual fading of m-phase peaks with the increasing temperature, further confirms the high-pressure-assisted phase transformation toward more stable high-symmetry phases. This phenomenon is attributed to the substitution of Zr4+ by larger Y3+ ions, which generates oxygen vacancies to maintain charge neutrality. The vacancies disrupt the long-range order of the oxygen sublattice and promote structural disorder, thereby reducing the free energy barrier for the formation of high-symmetry phases. In addition, lattice expansion caused by Y3+ incorporation helps to alleviate internal strain, making the c-phase thermodynamically favorable at lower temperatures under HPHT conditions.
Due to the overlap of the (101)t and (111)c diffraction peaks and the highly similar lattice parameters of the t- and c-phase, conventional XRD characterization cannot effectively differentiate between these two structures [30]. Therefore, Raman spectroscopy was employed to further analyze the phase composition of the ZrO2 samples. The t- to c-phase transformation is primarily influenced by the relative displacement of one crystallographic axis compared to the other two, along with adjustments of the oxygen ion positions within the fluorite structure [31]. Notably, the Raman spectrum of the c-phase exhibits a broad band between 530 and 670 cm−1, which is distinct from the sharp peaks characteristic of the m- and t-phase [32]. Figure 4 shows the Raman spectra of (3, 5, and 7)Y-PSZ samples, respectively, synthesized at temperatures ranging from 1000 °C to 2000 °C under 5 GPa. Sharp Raman peaks at m-180 cm−1, m-191 cm−1, and m-475 cm−1, along with strong peaks at ~335 cm−1, ~348 cm−1, and ~382 cm−1 (as shown by the labeled peaks in the figures) are characteristic of the m-phase, while the peaks at t-148 cm−1 and t-263 cm−1 are unique to the t-phase [33,34]. In Figure 4a, the intensity of the m-phase peaks (m-180 cm−1, m-191 cm−1, and m-475 cm−1) decreases with the increasing sintering temperature from 1200 °C to 1500 °C, while the t-phase peaks at (148 cm−1 and 263 cm−1) become pronounced. This trend indicates a progressive phase transformation from m- to t-phase. The c-phase is characterized by a broad Raman band in the 530–670 cm−1 region. In Figure 4a, this band becomes noticeably broader at 1700 °C compared to 1500 °C, which is consistent with the emergence of a c-phase (311)c diffraction peak in the corresponding XRD patterns. At 2000 °C, the intensities of the m-phase peaks further decrease, while the combined fraction of t- and c-phase increases from 47% to 70%, resulting in a three-phase composition. Similarly, Raman broadening is observed at 1500 °C for 5Y-PSZ (Figure 4b) and 1200 °C for 7Y-PSZ (Figure 4c), confirming the formation of the c-phase at lower temperatures with higher Y2O3 content. These results suggest that the formation of the c-phase is significantly promoted under 5 GPa, and the critical temperature for its appearance decreases with increasing Y2O3 content; approximately 1700 °C for 3Y-PSZ, 1500 °C for 5Y-PSZ, and 1200 °C for 7Y-PSZ.
Figure 5 and Figure 6 present the microstructural evolution and grain size distributions of 3Y-PSZ synthesized under 5 GPa. SEM images (Figure 5) reveal dense, crack-free microstructures with a homogeneous dispersion of the m- and t-phase. Grain size analysis (Figure 6) shows minimal growth at 400–600 °C (from 125 nm to 126 nm), consistent with the absence of t-phase XRD signals (Figure 2), confirming the phase stability below 800 °C. At 800 °C, the emergence of the t-phase is accompanied by a moderate grain coarsening to 143 nm. Further heating to 1000 °C leads to distinct t-phase stabilization and accelerated grain growth (243 nm) driven by enhanced atomic diffusion and grain boundary migration driven by interfacial energy minimization. Progressive heating to 1200–2000 °C yields non-monotonic growth: 503 nm at 1200 °C, 488 nm at 1500 °C, and 1.83 μm at 1700 °C, followed by an anomalous refinement to 443 nm at 2000 °C. This reversal suggests a competitive interplay between thermal-induced coarsening and high-pressure-induced lattice strain, highlighting the complex balance between thermodynamic and mechanical factors in extreme-condition sintering.

3.2. Mechanical Properties

Figure 7 presents the Vickers hardness (under a load of 19.6N) and fracture toughness of (3, 5, and 7)Y-PSZ, respectively, synthesized at different temperatures under 5 GPa. For 3Y-PSZ (Figure 7a), the samples sintered at 400 °C and 600 °C remained in the m-phase with slightly coarsened grains, showing low-average hardness values of 4.6 GPa and 6.6 GPa. With the increasing temperature, both hardness values and fracture toughness improved, reaching maximum values of 11.6 GPa and 9.26 MPa·m1/2 at 1200 °C, coinciding with the stabilization of the t-phase and grain refinement. However, further temperature elevation to 1700 °C resulted in significant grain growth (1.83 μm), leading to a decrease in hardness (7.8 GPa) consistent with the Hall–Petch effect [35]. Interestingly, at 2000 °C, the increasing content of the t- and c-phase, as confirmed by Figure 4, along with anomalous grain size refinement, contributed to a partial recovery in hardness to 11.2 GPa.
Similar trends were observed in the 5Y-PSZ and 7Y-PSZ samples, although both exhibited slightly lower fracture toughness compared to the 3Y-PSZ counterpart. For 5Y-PSZ (Figure 7b), the hardness increases with the increasing temperature as the t-phase fraction grows, reaching an inflection point at 1200 °C, where grain coarsening began to offset the strengthening effect. As the temperature rose further, the early appearance of the c-phase, due to higher Y2O3 content, led to a temporary increase in hardness, followed by a rapid decline caused by excessive grain growth and dominance of the c-phase. In 7Y-PSZ (Figure 7c), a similar trend was observed. However, the second hardness peak occurred earlier, at 1200 °C, consistent with the further reduction in the c-phase onset temperature induced by higher dopant levels. In summary, among all compositions, the 3Y-PSZ exhibited the best mechanical performance, achieving the highest hardness of 11.6 GPa and fracture toughness of 9.26 MPa·m1/2 at 1200 °C.
To further elucidate the effects of the stabilizer concentration on the fracture behavior of ZrO2 samples, Vickers hardness indentation and crack propagation analyses were carried out on 3Y-, 5Y-, and 7Y-PSZ samples sintered at 5 GPa and 1200 °C, as shown in Figure 8. In 3Y-PSZ, indentation under a 98 N load (Figure 8a) produced only short radial cracks. Higher magnification imaging (Figure 8b) reveals thin, blunt-ended cracks with limited extension and signs of crack branching, indicating strong resistance to crack propagation and excellent fracture toughness. The maximum toughness of 9.26 MPa·m1/2 achieved in this work is over 12% higher than the previously reported value of 8.2 MPa·m1/2 for t-phase ZrO2 fabricated via the TSS process [36]. This enhancement is attributed to the improved densification achieved through the HPHT method, which effectively activates the stress-induced m- to t-phase transformation toughening mechanism.
In 5Y-PSZ, the cracks are longer and more prominent (Figure 8c). A few deflected or arrested transgranular cracks are observed (Figure 8d), suggesting a partial loss of toughening mechanisms. Correspondingly, 7Y-PSZ (Figure 8e,f), exhibits a long, smooth, and uninterrupted crack path with minimal deflection or bridging, reflecting a significantly reduced crack resistance. As the Y2O3 concentration increases, the metastable t-phase becomes more stabilized and less likely to transform under stress, reducing the effectiveness of transformation toughening. In particular, the c-phase, which emerges prominently in 7Y-PSZ, is non-transformable and contributes little to fracture resistance. As a result, the contribution of transformation toughening diminishes, and cracks tend to propagate in a straighter, more brittle manner, with reduced deflection or crack-bridging effects. Quantitatively, this is reflected in the decreasing fracture toughness values: 9.26 MPa·m1/2 for 3Y-PSZ, 7.33 MPa·m1/2 for 5Y-PSZ, and 5.21 MPa·m1/2 for 7Y-PSZ. These observations confirm that 3Y-PSZ exhibits the highest fracture toughness among the studied compositions.

4. Conclusions

Nanocrystalline m-ZrO2 doped with 3, 5, and 7 mol% Y2O3 was successfully sintered under 5 GPa at 400 to 2000 °C, resulting in the partial or complete transformation to t- and c-phase depending on the dopant content and temperature. XRD and Raman analyses revealed that higher Y2O3 concentrations effectively reduced the transition temperatures for both t- and c-phase. SEM and hardness measurements further showed that 3Y-PSZ sintered at 1200 °C achieved the best performance, achieving a hardness of 11.6 GPa and a fracture toughness of 9.26 MPa·m1/2, about 12% higher than that of conventionally sintered ZrO2. This enhancement is attributed to pressure-induced transformation toughening. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of HPHT processing and the critical role of Y2O3 in optimizing the hardness–toughness balance. This work contributes valuable experimental evidence for assessing the scalability and industrial applicability of the HPHT process and provides a foundation for future investigations into alternative dopant or co-doping strategies. Further studies on long-term phase stability, creep behavior, and advanced microstructural characterization are essential for fully optimizing the performance and reliability of ZrO2-based ceramics.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft, J.Y.; methodology, J.Y.; visualization, J.Y. and Y.L.; data curation, J.Y. and W.G.; formal analysis, J.Y., Y.P., W.G., and Y.L.; writing—review and editing, Y.P. and J.Y.; resources, Y.P. and T.C.; supervision, Y.P.; funding acquisition, T.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant Nos. 2022YFA1405500, 2023YFA1406201), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52072188), and the Program for Science and Technology Innovation Team in Zhejiang (Grant No. 2021R01004).

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support from the School of Physical Science and Technology and the Institute of High Pressure Physics at Ningbo University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors confirm that no identifiable financial or personal conflicts exist that might have influenced the content or conclusions presented in this manuscript.

References

  1. Chevalier, J.; Gremillard, L.; Virkar, A.V.; Clarke, D.R. The tetragonal-monoclinic transformation in zirconia: Lessons learned and future trends. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2009, 92, 1901–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kelly, J.R.; Denry, I. Stabilized zirconia as a structural ceramic: An overview. Dent. Mater. 2008, 24, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Minh, N.Q. Ceramic fuel cells. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1993, 76, 563–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Suk, M.O.; Park, J.H. Corrosion behaviors of zirconia refractory by CaO–SiO2–MgO–CaF2 slag. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2009, 92, 717–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Basu, B.; Vleugels, J.; Van Der Biest, O. Transformation behaviour of tetragonal zirconia: Role of dopant content and distribution. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2004, 366, 338–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bocanegra-Bernal, M.; De La Torre, S.D. Phase transitions in zirconium dioxide and related materials for high performance engineering ceramics. J. Mater. Sci. 2002, 37, 4947–4971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kisi, E.H.; Howard, C. Crystal structures of zirconia phases and their inter-relation. Key Eng. Mater. 1998, 153, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Basu, B. Toughening of yttria-stabilised tetragonal zirconia ceramics. Int. Mater. Rev. 2005, 50, 239–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Al-Khatatbeh, Y.; Lee, K. From superhard to hard: A review of transition metal dioxides TiO2, ZrO2, and HfO2 hardness. J. Superhard Mater. 2014, 36, 231–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Borik, M.; Bublik, V.; Kulebyakin, A.; Lomonova, E.; Milovich, F.; Myzina, V.; Osiko, V.; Tabachkova, N.Y. Phase composition, structure and mechanical properties of PSZ (partially stabilized zirconia) crystals as a function of stabilizing impurity content. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 586, S231–S235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liao, S.C.; Colaizzi, J.; Chen, Y.; Kear, B.H.; Mayo, W.E. Refinement of Nanoscale Grain Structure in Bulk Titania via a Transformation-Assisted Consolidation (TAC) Method. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2000, 83, 2163–2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Piconi, C.; Maccauro, G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials 1999, 20, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tel, H.; Altaş, Y.; Eral, M.; Sert, Ş.; Çetinkaya, B.; İnan, S. Preparation of ZrO2 and ZrO2–TiO2 microspheres by the sol–gel method and an experimental design approach to their strontium adsorption behaviours. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 161, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, J.; Chu, D.; Ma, H.; Fang, S.; Chen, Q.; Liu, B.; Ji, G.; Zhang, Z.; Jia, X. Effect of sintering temperature on phase transformation behavior and hardness of high-pressure high-temperature sintered 10 mol% Mg-PSZ. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 15180–15185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xia, Y.; Mou, J.; Deng, G.; Wan, S.; Tieu, K.; Zhu, H.; Xue, Q. Sintered ZrO2–TiO2 ceramic composite and its mechanical appraisal. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 775–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yang, Y.; Hu, C.; Liu, Q.; Li, J. Research progress and prospects of colored zirconia ceramics: A review. J. Adv. Ceram. 2024, 13, 1505–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Denry, I.; Kelly, J.R. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent. Mater. 2008, 24, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Alhotan, A.; Yilmaz, B.; Weber, A.; Babaier, R.; Bourauel, C.; Fouda, A.M. Effect of artificial aging on fracture toughness and hardness of 3D-printed and milled 3Y-TZP zirconia. J. Prosthodont. 2024. online ahead of print. [Google Scholar]
  19. Tovar-Vargas, D.; Roitero, E.; Anglada, M.; Jiménez-Piqué, E.; Reveron, H. Mechanical properties of ceria-calcia stabilized zirconia ceramics with alumina additions. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 41, 5602–5612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kambale, K.; Mahajan, A.; Butee, S. Effect of grain size on the properties of ceramics. Met. Powder Rep. 2019, 74, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lu, K.; Lei, Z.; Deng, S.; Li, J.; Feng, T.; Luo, Z.; Ma, X. Synergistic effects of grain sizes on the corrosion behavior and mechanical properties in a metastable high-entropy alloy. Corros. Sci. 2023, 225, 111588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Raj, R. Analysis of the sintering pressure. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1987, 70, C-210–C-211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wilkinson, D.S.; Ashby, M. Pressure sintering by power law creep. Acta Metall. 1975, 23, 1277–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gao, L.; Li, W.; Wang, H.; Zhou, J.; Chao, Z.; Zai, Q. Fabrication of nano Y–TZP materials by superhigh pressure compaction. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2001, 21, 135–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Munoz-Saldana, J.; Balmori-Ramirez, H.; Jaramillo-Vigueras, D.; Iga, T.; Schneider, G. Mechanical properties and low-temperature aging of tetragonal zirconia polycrystals processed by hot isostatic pressing. J. Mater. Res. 2003, 18, 2415–2426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vahldiek, F.; Robinson, L.; Lynch, C. Tetragonal zirconium oxide prepared under high pressure. Science 1963, 142, 1059–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kulcinski, G. High-Pressure Induced Phase Transition in ZrO2. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1968, 51, 582–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Wang, F.; Liang, A. Ta2O5 in-situ composite Ta-based nanocrystalline coating with wonderful wear resistance and related wear mechanisms. Mater. Lett. 2021, 298, 130000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Toraya, H.; Yoshimura, M.; Somiya, S. Calibration curve for quantitative analysis of the monoclinic-tetragonal ZrO2 system by X-ray diffraction. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1984, 67, C-119–C-121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Brito-Chaparro, J.; Reyes-Rojas, A.; Bocanegra-Bernal, M.; Aguilar-Elguezabal, A.; Echeberria, J. Elucidating of the microstructure of ZrO2 ceramics with additions of 1200° C heat treated ultrafine MgO powders: Aging at 1420 °C. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2007, 106, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Feinberg, A.; Perry, C. Structural disorder and phase transitions in ZrO2-Y2O3 system. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1981, 42, 513–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Michel, D.; Collongues, R. Study by Raman spectroscopy of order-disorder phenomena occurring in some binary oxides with fluorite-related structures. J. Raman Spectrosc. 1976, 5, 163–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Calderon-Moreno, J.M.; Yoshimura, M. Characterization by Raman spectroscopy of solid solutions in the yttria-rich side of the zirconia–yttria system. Solid State Ion. 2002, 154, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sekulić, A.; Furić, K.; Stubičar, M. Raman study of phase transitions in pure and alloyed zirconia induced by ball-milling and a laser beam. J. Mol. Struct. 1997, 410, 275–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dunstan, D.; Bushby, A. Grain size dependence of the strength of metals: The Hall–Petch effect does not scale as the inverse square root of grain size. Int. J. Plast. 2014, 53, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chee, H.A.; Singh, R.; Lee, K.S. Effects of pressureless two-step sintering on the densification and properties of tetragonal zirconia. J. Ceram. Process. Res. 2021, 22, 289–295. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the experimental assembly; (b) schematic of the experimental temperature and pressure program.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the experimental assembly; (b) schematic of the experimental temperature and pressure program.
Nanomaterials 15 01235 g001
Figure 2. (a) XRD patterns of 3Y-PSZ at various temperatures at 5 GPa; (b) partial enlargement of the (101)t diffraction peak; and (c) the high-angle region of the XRD patterns (around 2θ ≈ 60°).
Figure 2. (a) XRD patterns of 3Y-PSZ at various temperatures at 5 GPa; (b) partial enlargement of the (101)t diffraction peak; and (c) the high-angle region of the XRD patterns (around 2θ ≈ 60°).
Nanomaterials 15 01235 g002
Figure 3. (a,b) XRD patterns of 5Y-PSZ at different temperatures under 5 GPa and enlarged views of m- and t-phase peaks; (c,d) XRD patterns and enlarged views of 7Y-PSZ at different temperatures under 5 GPa and enlarged views of m- and t-phase peaks.
Figure 3. (a,b) XRD patterns of 5Y-PSZ at different temperatures under 5 GPa and enlarged views of m- and t-phase peaks; (c,d) XRD patterns and enlarged views of 7Y-PSZ at different temperatures under 5 GPa and enlarged views of m- and t-phase peaks.
Nanomaterials 15 01235 g003
Figure 4. (ac) Present the Raman spectra of (3, 5, and 7)Y-PSZ, respectively, synthesized under a pressure of 5 GPa and sintering temperatures ranging from 1000 to 2000 °C.
Figure 4. (ac) Present the Raman spectra of (3, 5, and 7)Y-PSZ, respectively, synthesized under a pressure of 5 GPa and sintering temperatures ranging from 1000 to 2000 °C.
Nanomaterials 15 01235 g004
Figure 5. SEM images of 3Y-PSZ synthesized under 5 GPa at temperatures ranging from 400 to 2000 °C.
Figure 5. SEM images of 3Y-PSZ synthesized under 5 GPa at temperatures ranging from 400 to 2000 °C.
Nanomaterials 15 01235 g005
Figure 6. Grain size distributions of 3Y-PSZ synthesized under 5 GPa at temperatures ranging from 400 to 2000 °C.
Figure 6. Grain size distributions of 3Y-PSZ synthesized under 5 GPa at temperatures ranging from 400 to 2000 °C.
Nanomaterials 15 01235 g006
Figure 7. (ac) Average Vickers hardness (left-axis) and fracture toughness (right-axis) of (3, 5, and 7)Y-PSZ synthesized at different temperatures under 5 GPa.
Figure 7. (ac) Average Vickers hardness (left-axis) and fracture toughness (right-axis) of (3, 5, and 7)Y-PSZ synthesized at different temperatures under 5 GPa.
Nanomaterials 15 01235 g007
Figure 8. (af) Vickers indentations and crack propagation of (3, 5, and 7)Y-PSZ samples, sintered at 1200 °C under 5 GPa, with applied loads of 98 N, 98 N, and 19.6 N, respectively.
Figure 8. (af) Vickers indentations and crack propagation of (3, 5, and 7)Y-PSZ samples, sintered at 1200 °C under 5 GPa, with applied loads of 98 N, 98 N, and 19.6 N, respectively.
Nanomaterials 15 01235 g008
Table 1. Phase composition (m: monoclinic, t: tetragonal, and c: cubic) of 3Y-PSZ ceramics under high-pressure sintering (5 GPa) at varying temperatures.
Table 1. Phase composition (m: monoclinic, t: tetragonal, and c: cubic) of 3Y-PSZ ceramics under high-pressure sintering (5 GPa) at varying temperatures.
Pressure (GPa)Temperature (°C)Time (min)PhasePhase Content
540010mm: 100%
600mm: 100%
800m + tm: 68% t: 32%
1000m + tm: 61% t: 39%
1200m + tm: 38% t: 62%
1500m + tm: 38% t: 62%
1700m + t + cm: 52% t + c: 47%
2000m + t + cm: 30% t + c: 70%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

You, J.; Guo, W.; Li, Y.; Pan, Y.; Cui, T. Phase Evolution and Mechanical Performance of Zirconia Ceramics Synthesized Under High Temperature and High Pressure. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 1235. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15161235

AMA Style

You J, Guo W, Li Y, Pan Y, Cui T. Phase Evolution and Mechanical Performance of Zirconia Ceramics Synthesized Under High Temperature and High Pressure. Nanomaterials. 2025; 15(16):1235. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15161235

Chicago/Turabian Style

You, Jin, Wenjie Guo, Yangyang Li, Yilong Pan, and Tian Cui. 2025. "Phase Evolution and Mechanical Performance of Zirconia Ceramics Synthesized Under High Temperature and High Pressure" Nanomaterials 15, no. 16: 1235. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15161235

APA Style

You, J., Guo, W., Li, Y., Pan, Y., & Cui, T. (2025). Phase Evolution and Mechanical Performance of Zirconia Ceramics Synthesized Under High Temperature and High Pressure. Nanomaterials, 15(16), 1235. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15161235

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop