3.1. Comparison of the Decay Spectra for the Bare and Buried Oxide
Figure 2 shows the comparison of the normalized positron (e
+) lifetime spectra of the bare oxide at
and the MOS structure at
for three bias voltage conditions: open circuit
,
and
. The distinct bias conditions provide direct evidence of the impact of the electric field on the oxide’s annihilation characteristics. The comparison of the decay spectra for
for bare oxide on silicon at
(green curve) and buried oxide at
(red curve) shows that the decay in the time range of
–
is affected by the deposition of the aluminum gate on the buried oxide. The presence of the Al gate lowers the intensity of the longest component without any significant effect on the decay slope and thus on the positron lifetime in the SiO
2 layer.
It can be observed by comparing the red, blue and black curves, that the intensity of the longest component in the 5–10 ns range decreases with the magnitude of
, from 0–30 V, independent of the polarity. Remarkably, the slope remains quasi-constant, independent of the magnitude and polarity of
. In the 1–1.6 ns range, the curves of the MOS capacitor show a different trend depending on
as depicted in the inlay of
Figure 2. This indicates that for short decay times, the effect of the gate voltage is dependent on the magnitude and polarity of
and leads to different annihilation characteristics. This suggests the presence of distinct positron annihilation modes near the Al/SiO
2 and SiO
2/Si interfaces, respectively.
3.2. Positron Annihilation Quantum States in the Bare Oxide Stack
3.2.1. Annihilation Characteristic of the Bare Oxide Layer
Figure 3 shows a decay spectrum of the bare oxide layer analyzed with a pulsed positron beam of
. Due to the low mobility of positrons in the oxide, their annihilation occurs predominantly within the SiO
2 near-surface region, resulting in minimal contributions from the silicon substrate or the surface itself. This allows us to observe the undisturbed annihilation characteristics of SiO
2. The blue dots correspond to the measured decay spectrum. The spectrum with the green dots given by a limited time window is fitted by a model function
of the form:
In the actual spectrum, is decomposed into a sum of three exponential decay components of lifetimes and intensities , convoluted with the instrument resolution function . In addition, a constant background B is added. Accurate extraction of the lifetime components requires optimizing the time resolution to be as small as possible and determining the as precisely as possible. The colored dashed lines correspond to the exponential decay components extracted from the fit.
The three lifetime components, indicated by colored dashed lines in
Figure 3, include two lifetimes above
identified as
and
, which together contribute 77% to the total spectrum. The shortest lifetime,
, accounts for roughly a quarter of the resolved annihilation signal.
Positron lifetimes above
can be attributed to the annihilation of ortho-positronium (o-Ps), a hydrogen-like bound state of an electron and a positron [
28]. Positronium formation is commonly observed in nanometer or sub-nanometer voids in materials such as amorphous insulators and polymers. Two spin states of Ps exist: the singlet state, known as para-Ps, which annihilates via two-gamma emission with a vacuum lifetime of
, and the triplet state, known as ortho-Ps, which annihilates via three-gamma emission with a vacuum lifetime of
[
29]. However, in condensed matter, the lifetime of o-Ps is typically reduced to a few nanoseconds due to the processes of positronium pick-off annihilation with the surrounding electrons of the material by two-gamma emission or other quenching mechanisms [
30,
31,
32]. Spin statistics demands the formation ratio of p-Ps to o-Ps in vacuum to be 1:3 [
29,
33].
It follows that the long component, and = 52(1)%, is attributed to the pick-off annihilation of ortho-positronium (o-Ps) in open-volume defects. The intermediate component, and = 25(1)%, includes contributions from both o-Ps pick-off annihilation within the oxide layer and the annihilation of free positrons. The shortest component, and = 23(1)%, is related either to the self-annihilation of para-positronium (p-Ps) in the oxide, or, to the annihilation of free positrons, depending on the implantation energy. Since all lifetime components originate at least partly from positronium annihilation, it can be concluded that positronium formation is a dominant physical process in the oxide.
3.2.2. Depth Profile of the Bare Oxide Sample
Figure 4 shows the three-component decomposition as a function of the implantation energy. As a depth reference, the oxide-equivalent mean implantation depth
is shown on the secondary x-axis. The oxide layer is highlighted in purple, and the lines connecting the data points serve as guides to the eye.
We observe that, with increasing implantation energy, the lifetime of the first component (blue) increases from to . The largest change occurs between and . The intensity of the first component also increases steadily with increasing implantation energy, with the most pronounced rise occurring at the transition from the oxide to the semiconductor layer.
The lifetime of the second component (red) initially increases between and and then continuously decreases until the energy is reached where the mean penetration depth matches the interface of the oxide. For higher energies, it remains nearly constant. The intensity of the second component shows maxima at and . Its intensity decreases slightly inside the oxide, while it continuously decreases outside the oxide.
The lifetime of the third component (green) first increases in the same energy range as the second component and then steadily decreases with increasing implantation energy. Its intensity initially increases slightly and reaches a maximum of = 52% between and . As the oxide/semiconductor interface is approached, its intensity decreases to 5%.
It is well documented in the literature that positronium (Ps) annihilation is generally an annihilation mode that does not occur in conductive materials such as aluminum and silicon [
30]. Thus, Ps annihilation mode as para-Ps or ortho-Ps with the relation of
, can be safely attributed to the SiO
2 or SiO
2/Si interface.
This interpretation is supported by the parallel behavior of
and
at implantation energies below
in
Figure 4. Additionally, the ratio
aligns with the expected formation ratio. With increasing positron fraction in the silicon—above
—the intensity of the o-Ps component decreases and
increases sharply and approaches the lifetime expected in defect-free silicon [
34,
35].
At an implantation energy of
, surface effects are still visible in all three components. In particular,
shows a typical surface lifetime of about
[
36,
37]. As the energy increases,
decreases because fewer positrons annihilate in surface states. However, between
and
,
increases while simultaneously the o-Ps intensity
decreases as the fraction of positrons in the substrate increases and more positrons can reach the SiO
2/Si interface via back-diffusion. Above
,
drops to nearly zero as the positron fraction in the oxide and the near-surface interface region decreases with the implantation energy. The trends observed in
and
suggest that open-volume defects dominate the microstructure of the oxide, while no such defects are present in the silicon.
The lifetime value of
is longer then the vacuum lifetime (
) of p-Ps. This indicates that other annihilation modes could contribute to the short lifetime component. They most likely arise from the
annihilation mode of unbound positron-electron pairs, i.e., free positron annihilation. This gives rise to an unknown component
. We use a simple model, which utilizes the positron formation ratio to extract the unknown lifetime
as follows:
This model assumes that the p-Ps lifetime is equal to the vacuum lifetime of
with an intensity
. For the lifetime component,
and
, the calculated values extracted from Equation (
2) are
and
= 5.7%.
Similar lifetimes and intensities were reported for crystalline, vitreous bulk [
38] or thin layers [
20]. The most striking comparison to the literature is for the calculated lifetime component,
and
. Such a lifetime of about ≈
has been reported for an crystalline SiO
2 with a much higher intensity of about 25% [
38]. This leads to the assumption that in the SiO
2 system investigated in this work, some precipitates of crystalline silica are embedded in the amorphous SiO
2 network.
3.3. Positron Annihilation Quantum States in the MOS Capacitor
The evolution of the lifetime components in the different layers of the MOS capacitor can be seen in
Figure 5. We investigate the MOS capacitor under three different gate voltages, namely
and the two extreme cases of
and
. As a depth reference, the oxide-equivalent mean implantation depth
is shown on the secondary axis, and the different MOS layers are highlighted using colors (blue for aluminum and purple for the oxide). In this graph, the different colors of the data points correspond to the different gate voltage configurations. The lines connecting the data points are intended as eye guides.
Under open-circuit conditions, the first lifetime component decreases from at to a minimum of , then increases for energies above . Its intensity follows a parabolic trend, with a minimum of 14% at . The second component increases from in the aluminum () to in the oxide, then slightly decreases for higher energies. Its intensity reaches a maximum of 66(1)% at , followed by a decrease to 38(1)%. The third component lifetime decreases from to with increasing energy, while its intensity peaks at 39(1)% in the oxide and drops to 4(1)% at .
Under negative gate bias (), the first component behaves similar to the open circuit condition but with higher lifetimes between and . We observe a parabolic intensity minimum at and for higher energies, the intensity increases to a maximum of 52(1)% at . The second component remains nearly constant between and , with intensity increasing to 83(1)% at the oxide–semiconductor interface, then decreasing to 46(1)%. The third component lifetime decreases to , while its intensity follows a similar trend as under open-circuit conditions, but with a lower peak at 15(1)%.
With positive gate bias (), the first component reaches a minimum of at , then increases up to . Its intensity drops to 12(1)%, then rises to 95(1)% at the highest energy. The second component stays around below and increases to , with intensity peaking at 75(1)% before dropping to 4(1)%. The third component lifetime decreases moderately to , and its intensity remains similar to the negative bias case, with a slightly lower maximum of 13(1)%.
Figure 5 unambiguously shows the effect of the electric field on the lifetime components as a function of implantation energy. The blue curve (
) serves as the reference measurement and shows that the annihilation characteristics are only affected by diffusion. In the oxide, the diffusion is very limited with a diffusion length of ≈10 nm [
39] and thus, oxide-thermalized positrons annihilate close to their location of thermalization. We can summarize the annihilation modes based on their energy as follows:
free positron annihilation in the Al-gate for .
positronium and free positron annihilation in the oxide between .
free positron annihilation in the substrate for .
All lifetimes and intensities from the different gate voltage conditions show a similar starting point at . However, the variation in and I is the first indicator of a positron drift. We can conclude this since a fraction of positrons is already implanted into the oxide and thus drifts to either one of the interfaces. The lifetimes and intensities for energies between and can be attributed to positrons mainly annihilating in the oxide of the MOS capacitor. For , the intensity of the o-Ps component is highest, effectively reducing the contribution of the other two annihilation modes. When a gate voltage is applied, the intensity of the o-Ps component reduces significantly by ≈60%. This decrease depends only on the electric field strength and not on the direction. We can conclude that the application of the electric field greatly inhibits the formation of o-Ps.
Another observation in
Figure 5 is the deviation of
and
at around
for the two biased measurement. First, they show the same trend, suggesting that positrons see the same amount of defects, but with different defect sizes. This suggests that vacancy clusters might be the main defect type in the SiO
2 layer. The size of these vacancy clusters varies with the location of positron annihilation within the oxide. They become smaller as the positrons annihilate closer to the SiO
2/Si interface. In
Figure 5 above
, the intensities,
and
, of the
measurement starts to differ from the
measurement. With increasing implantation energy, a larger fraction of positrons is implanted into the silicon substrate. This fraction then drifts in the near-surface electric field of the silicon layer. For negative gate voltages, the positrons in the oxide still drift to the gate electrode, and positrons in the substrate get drifted back to the SiO
2/Si interface, increasing the intensity
of vacancy clusters present at the interface. For positive gate voltages, positrons in the oxide get drifted to the SiO
2 interface, and substrate-implanted positrons get drifted into the silicon bulk. However, the increase in positron fraction in the substrate alone does not fully explain the intensity change between
and
:
The positron fraction, , that stops in the oxide remains constant at approximately 80% for both energies. The positron fraction, , stopping in the silicon substrate increases by 6% from to . This increase is smaller than the observed change in intensity, 14(1)%, from 12(1)% to 26(1)%. Therefore, the rise in intensity cannot be attributed solely to annihilation in the silicon substrate. Instead, this change likely includes contributions from annihilation within the oxide. Given its dependence on both implantation depth and electric field strength, this annihilation mode is likely associated with the microstructure near the SiO2/Si interface.
Above implantation energies of
, the intensity of the first component begins to align with the increasing positron fraction in the substrate, indicating that both lifetimes and intensities are primarily influenced by the electric field in the near-surface region of the silicon layer. At
and
, positrons reach the interface through back-diffusion and drift, respectively. At
,
Figure 5 clearly shows a trend consistent with defect-free bulk silicon, as positrons are drifted deeper into the substrate. The drift behavior in the silicon substrate will be discussed in a separate publication.
3.4. Positron Annihilation Quantum States in the Buried Oxide of the MOS Capacitor
The energy-dependent data in
Figure 5 suggest a change in annihilation characteristics, possibly linked to the SiO
2/Si interface. To investigate the field-induced variations in the relative contributions of Ps and free e
+ annihilation, we need to examine how the three lifetime components depend on the applied gate voltage
.
Figure 6 presents the results of the lifetime analysis as a function of gate voltage for an implantation energy of
. At that energy the mean implantation range is in the middle of the SiO
2 layer, and about ≈80% of the positrons are stopped in the oxide layer. Thus, the number of positrons affected by the drift is maximized. The secondary axis indicates the corresponding electric field within the SiO
2 layer derived from the applied gate voltage. The different drift regimes (see
Figure 1) are highlighted using colored boxes: red (Al direction) drift to Al/SiO
2 interface; white (flatband range) no distinct drift direction; blue (Si direction) drift to SiO
2/Si interface.
The shortest lifetime component (blue dots), , exhibits a distinct minimum at of . As the drift toward the Al gate increases (from to ), increases to . In the opposite drift direction—toward the Si substrate –, increases sharply to at , and continues rising to at . The intensity increases gradually from 10(2)% at to a maximum of 23(2)% at .
The intermediate lifetime (green squares), , remains relatively stable in both drift directions. It averages for negative voltages and unter flatband condition and drops to for positive voltages. However, its intensity, , decreases significantly from 77% to 48% as increases from to . For gate voltages in the flatband range, stabilizes at approximately 49%. As the field increases in the Si direction, rises again and levels off at around 60% between and .
The longest lifetime component (red triangles), peaks at within the flatband range. Outside this range, in both the Al direction and Si direction, decreases linearly by about 3%. The corresponding intensity, , also drops symmetrically with increasing field strength. It declines from 36% at to 15% at and to 13% at .
3.4.1. Drift Transport in SiO2
Two key considerations govern the drift in the oxide layer of the MOS capacitor. First, the electric field can only act on free positrons. Second, the difference in positron affinities between the oxide and the adjacent layers—illustrated in
Figure 1—creates a potential well that confines positrons within the oxide [
27,
40,
41]. Thus, the kinetic energy gained from the electric field used in this experiment is insufficient to overcome this drift barrier with
. We use transport estimations similar to charge carriers in semiconductors or metals and calculate the transit time
a free positron needs to traverse the
oxide layer in an electric field of
. The most recent calculation of the positron mobility in SiO
2 was reported to be
by Petkov et al. [
22]. This mobility value results from fitting the drift-diffusion equation for positrons to the experimental Doppler broadening spectroscopy data. The authors also note that the determination of the diffusion constant through this fitting procedure is subject to significant uncertainty, which in turn leads to a large uncertainty in the extracted mobility. This, along with reports of much lower mobility values in the literature [
17], suggests that either the fitting method or the oxide fabrication process has a substantial impact on the positron mobility. Therefore, these drift estimates should be regarded as qualitative and interpreted with caution.
With an electric field of
, we can calculate the mean drift velocity of positrons
. Such a velocity results in an oxide transit time of
. This would suggest that positrons are transported rapidly through the oxide. As Petkov et al. already discussed, the electric field results in a minor addition to the total kinetic energy of thermalized positrons (≈5% in our case) and thus the de Broglie wavelength is still larger than the dimension of the defects and trapping should not be influenced drastically by the drift. However, the experimental results suggest otherwise, since a significant change in the annihilation characteristics is observed even at moderate fields (see
Figure 6). This was explained by elastic scattering dominating over inelastic scattering processes, i.e., the excitation of transversal optical phonons [
22]. As a result, each scattering event results in insufficient energy loss, requiring multiple interactions before a positron can be effectively trapped at a defect site. Moreover, the electric field within the oxide continuously accelerates positrons between scattering events, further reducing the likelihood of trapping. For weak electric fields, the flatband range in
Figure 6, the drift effect is explained by the transport of epithermal positrons, effectively shifting the implantation profile before the thermalization is completed [
22].
3.4.2. Drift Effect on Positronium Annihilation
First, we give a comparison between the o-Ps annihilation in the bare oxide and the buried oxide at an applied gate voltage of . The contribution of the ortho-positronium mode is maximal when the fraction of oxide positrons is maximal and the internal electric field is small or zero. The small variation of the lifetime (≈5%) between the buried oxide and the bare oxide at indicates that the o-Ps pick-off process is similar for both oxides. The huge relative difference in intensity (≈16%) suggests that the o-Ps annihilation is suppressed in the buried oxide. An explanation for the observed reduction in o-Ps intensity is the superposition of two contributing factors: First, the existing intrinsic electric field at in the buried oxide. Second, the fraction of positrons not thermalized in the oxide.
The application of a gate voltage strongly reduces ortho-positronium (o-Ps) annihilation, regardless of whether the voltage is positive or negative. This is shown by the decrease in o-Ps intensity,
, in
Figure 6 as the electric field becomes stronger. The relative reduction is 64% from
= 36(1)% to 13(1)%. This reduction can be explained by charge separation, where the electric field separates the free electrons—generated during the thermalization of the positron—from the positron itself before positronium formation can occur [
42]. In comparison, the change in o-Ps lifetime with applied voltage is small, only about 2%. A proportional reduction is expected for the intensity of the para-positronium (p-Ps) component.
Figure 6 shows this is true for negative, but not for positive voltages. For positive voltages, the increase in
suggests that another positron annihilation process becomes stronger as positrons drift toward the SiO
2/Si interface. However, the lifetime
increases for both polarities to a lifetime higher than
. This increase in
indicates that a new annihilation mode becomes observable, which was hidden by Ps formation at zero-field conditions and now dominates when Ps formation is suppressed. The asymmetric change in
suggests that this annihilation process occurs more often near the SiO
2/Si interface.
The continuous reduction of the o-Ps annihilation is observed as the internal field of the SiO
2 layer increases to field strengths above ≈
(see
Table 2). This is in agreement with previous investigations in
-SiO
2 and polymer materials [
42,
43]. The Ps suppression is consistent with an internal field that either inhibits Ps formation during thermalization or during the trapping process. However, the lifetime spectra alone do not provide sufficient information to unambiguously identify the dominant process.
3.4.3. Free Positron Annihilation Induced by e+ Drift
As we elaborated in the previous section, the suppression of positronium formation by the drift effect leads to the generation of free positrons that can be trapped in defects. This is evidenced by the increase in the intensity
of the vacancy cluster component in both drift directions (
Figure 5 and
Figure 6). Additionally, we identified an increase in the short component for positive gate voltages, which suggests that an unknown defect lifetime is superimposed on the p-Ps annihilation and cannot be resolved through conventional PALS analysis. Therefore, we apply the simple model from Equation (
2) to extract the unresolved lifetime (
and
) from the short component.
Figure 7 shows the estimation of
and
over the whole gate voltage range. The calculated values are listed in
Table 3.
The observations presented in
Figure 7 can be classified into three distinct regions, each corresponding to a different positron drift regime:
Al direction (): remains quasi-constant with an average lifetime of and average intensity = 2.8(3)%. This is also the case for the medium oxide lifetime with an average value of . The intensity decreases from 77.1(5)% to 62.0(3)%.
Flatband range (): and is quasi-constant at and 5(2)%, respectively. This is also observed for the medium oxide component with mean values and 48(4)%.
Si direction (): , remains quasi-constant with a mean value of whereas the intensity, , increases from 10.8% to 21.7%. The medium oxide lifetime, , remains quasi-constant with a mean value of , whereas the intensity, , slowly increases from 49(20)% at to 61(2)% for .
Both lifetimes remain below the Ps average lifetime limit of
at any gate voltage [
30]. The variation of those two components with the applied electric field shows that free positrons can probe different electronic environments in the amorphous SiO
2 network.
3.4.4. Microstructure of the Buried Oxide
Analyzing the influence of positron drift on the lifetime spectra enables insights into the microstructure of the oxide that are not accessible under zero-field conditions, where o-Ps annihilation dominates the spectra and obscures other annihilation channels.
In
Figure 7 the correlation of the lifetime components (
,
,
and
) with the gate voltage
is consistent with the existence of positron annihilation states arising from two categories of sub-nano void populations.
The strength and direction of the electric field influence the type of voids where positrons annihilate. At higher electric fields, between 0.5–1.7 MV/cm, the size of the open spaces in the two types of sub-nanometer voids tends to be smaller when positrons drift toward silicon (Si) compared to aluminum (Al). This is shown by shorter lifetimes related to and when the gate voltage changes from to . For the smaller voids (), the lifetime increases by 9%, accompanied by an intensity increase of up to ≈700%. In contrast, for the larger voids (), the lifetime decreases by 7%, while the intensity drops by approximately 24%. This difference in void size and its effect on positron annihilation shows that the electric field gives insight into uneven distributions of the sub-nanometer voids. As the internal field strength decreases from the Al direction to the flatband range, the lifetime linked to the voids drops clearly, from to . This decrease of approximately 20% remains unclear.
As previously stated, free positrons exhibit a higher capture rate in the smaller void population () when drifted towards the SiO2/Si interface than when drifted towards the Al/SiO2 interface. This behavior can have multiple possible explanations.
One is the gradual densification along the oxidation direction, from the Al/SiO
2 interface to the SiO
2/Si interface [
21]. Another possibility is enhanced trapping in near-interface defects, such as silicon dangling bonds (
centers) [
44,
45].
centers at the interface of thermally oxidized, p-doped Si(100) have already been identified as possible interface defects using two-dimensional angular correlation spectroscopy (2D-ACAR) [
46]. Two mechanisms may explain the increase in intensity
. First, positron drift could simply transport more positrons to the interface region, leading to increased trapping at
centers. Second, electrons accumulated on the silicon side in inversion may change the charge state of
centers through charge carrier trapping. Since positrons are insensitive to positively charged defects, this charge state switching could increase trapping by converting previously positive
centers into effective trapping sites. However, based on current data, a definitive explanation for the increase in the intensity of the small void population cannot be given.
In summary, when the electric field is strong enough to suppress positronium formation, the open volume size and the density of voids primarily govern free positron trapping and annihilation. In cases where positronium annihilation dominates, other annihilation channels remain hidden. These channels become accessible only when the positron drift reduces the formation probability of positronium.