Next Article in Journal
A Strain-Compensated InGaAs/InGaSb Type-II Superlattice Grown on InAs Substrates for Long-Wavelength Infrared Photodetectors
Previous Article in Journal
Quantum Diamond Microscopy of Individual Vaterite Microspheres Containing Magnetite Nanoparticles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Defect Studies in Thin-Film SiO2 of a Metal-Oxide-Silicon Capacitor Using Drift-Assisted Positron Annihilation Lifetime Spectroscopy

1
Institute for Applied Physics and Measurement Technology, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, 85579 Munich, Germany
2
LSI, CEA/DRF/IRAMIS, CNRS, Ecole Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, 91120 Palaiseau, France
3
Institute of Radiation Physics, Helmholtz Center Dresden-Rossendorf, 01328 Dresden, Germany
4
Institute of Physics, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, 85579 Munich, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2025, 15(15), 1142; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15151142
Submission received: 19 May 2025 / Revised: 14 July 2025 / Accepted: 20 July 2025 / Published: 23 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Nanoelectronics, Nanosensors and Devices)

Abstract

This work investigates the impact of an internal electric field on the annihilation characteristics of positrons implanted in a 180 ( 10 ) nm SiO2 layer of a Metal-Oxide-Silicon (MOS) capacitor, using Positron Annihilation Lifetime Spectroscopy (PALS). By varying the gate voltage, electric fields up to 1.72 MV / cm were applied. The measurements reveal a field-dependent suppression of positronium (Ps) formation by up to 64 % , leading to an enhancement of free positron annihilation. The increase in free positrons suggests that vacancy clusters are the dominant defect type in the oxide layer. Additionally, drift towards the SiO2/Si interface reveals not only larger void-like defects but also a distinct population of smaller traps that are less prominent when drifting to the Al/SiO2 interface. In total, by combining positron drift with PALS, more detailed insights into the nature and spatial distribution of defects within the SiO2 network and in particular near the SiO2/Si interface are obtained.

1. Introduction

Field-effect transistors are the building block of modern electronics. More recently, thin-film transistors (TFT) have gained in relevance. Such devices have several advantages over conventional Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor transistors (MOSFET) [1]. These devices can be constructed from a variety of materials [2] and are utilized in the fabrication of sensors, detectors, integrated circuits, and displays [3]. One of the limiting factors of their device performance and reliability is the dielectric-semiconductor interface. At the interface, structural defects lead to interface states, which decrease carrier mobility and act as carrier traps [1,2]. With increasing performance demands and the continuous development of semiconductor device concepts, such as 3D integrated transistors [4] and 2D devices [5], the choice of dielectric materials has become increasingly important. Each new oxide system—such as HfO2 [6], or Gd2O5 [7]—introduces its intrinsic defect configuration as well as unique interface-related defect structures. To optimize and better understand the fabrication processes of these oxide layers, it is important to know the origin of defects in order to control their formation for specific applications. In the following, a method is presented that has the potential to characterize defects in ultra-thin oxide layers, and most importantly, at their interfaces.
Positron Annihilation Lifetime Spectroscopy (PALS) is a unique, non-destructive analytical technique used to characterize defects in various fields of materials science [8,9,10]. Analyzing the positron lifetime in a material allows for the identification of defect size and type, which are characteristic of the specific material system. For thin films or layered material systems, PALS based on slow-positron beams is an indispensable tool for depth-resolved defect characterization [11]. However, due to the width of the slow positron implantation profile, the detection of buried ultra-thin films of thicknesses of only a few nanometers and even interfaces can be difficult. It is possible to overcome this limitation by combining PALS with slow positrons in the keV range and a simultaneous application of a sample bias, which can lead to strong electric fields inside the material. An electric field influences the positron diffusion by adding a drift velocity v d = μ + E , with μ + being the positron mobility in the material. The drift can thus be exploited to transport positrons to the desired region. The simplest geometry and one of the most researched thin-layered systems is the Metal-Oxide-Silicon (MOS) capacitor [12,13,14,15]. One of the first to demonstrate drift-assisted Doppler broadening measurement on a MOS capacitor was Uedono et al. [16] followed by other groups who used this technique to gain insight into the structure of the SiO2 layer and especially the SiO2/Si interface [17,18,19,20,21,22]. Thus, the Metal–SiO2–Si capacitor is well-suited for testing and validating the new positron annihilation technique.
All previous drift-assisted PAS measurements are based on Doppler broadening spectroscopy, from which it is difficult to derive quantifiable information about the defect type, size, and concentration. Positron Annihilation Lifetime Spectroscopy (PALS) offers a precise method to determine the number of exponential decay components arising from positron annihilation in various quantum states. Currently, only two pulsed low-energy positron beam instruments—PLEPS [23] and MePS [24]—offer the time resolution and peak-to-background ratio required to perform near-surface PALS measurements under bias voltage conditions with both high reproducibility and reliability. This work presents the first beam-based drift-assisted PALS experiment on a thermally grown SiO2 layer on a Si(100) substrate.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Metal-Oxide Silicon System

The SiO2 was thermally grown on a 500 μ m p-doped silicon(100) substrate with a doping concentration of 1.2 × 10 15 cm 3 . The thermal oxidation process was carried out at 950 ° C in H2O atmosphere for 75 min . The resulting oxide layer has a thickness of 180 ( 10 ) nm . No post-oxidation annealing was performed. An aluminum gate with an area of 10 × 10   mm 2 and a thickness of 40 ( 5 ) nm was vapor-deposited onto the oxide using a physical vapor deposition (PVD) evaporation system. The back of the silicon wafer was also vapor-deposited with a thin aluminum layer, which serves as a back contact. Standard Capacitance-Voltage (CV) profiling of the Metal-Oxide-Silicon (MOS) system revealed a flat-band voltage of 0.9 V and a surface state density of 10 10 10 11 cm 2 e V 1 at the SiO2/Si interface.
A bare oxide-silicon stack from the same wafer was also prepared to determine the annihilation characteristics of the oxide in the absence of the Al layer. The reference stack will be referred to as the bare oxide, and the oxide layer of the MOS capacitor will be referred to as the buried oxide.

2.2. Positron-Annihilation Lifetime Spectroscopy (PALS)

When pulsed low-energy positrons are implanted into a material, their depth distribution follows a Makhovian profile, which mainly depends on the material density and the incident positron energy [11]. In the case of positron implantation at 4 keV into amorphous SiO2, this distribution extends from the surface to about 300 nm into the oxide, with a mean implantation depth of 124 nm . Within this range, 99% of all positrons are contained.
After implantation and thermalization in the lattice, the positron diffuses through the material until it becomes trapped at a defect site, provided that the defect concentration is higher than 1 × 10 16 cm 3 [25]. The positron eventually annihilates with an electron of the surrounding lattice. The time between implantation and annihilation is called the positron lifetime. This lifetime is inversely related to the local electron density, which varies between the bulk and defect regions. Therefore, the measured lifetime provides insight into the material’s defect structure and its defect density. A detailed discussion of positron–matter interactions is beyond the scope of this work. For a comprehensive overview of the underlying physical principles, we kindly refer the reader to the relevant literature, such as [26].
The PALS spectra were recorded as a function of implantation energy in the range of 1 11 keV at the Mono-energetic Positron Source (MePS) at the Helmholtz Center Dresden-Rossendorf [24]. At least 1 × 10 7 counts were accumulated per spectrum, and the peak-to-background ratio of the recorded spectra was higher than 1 × 10 7 :1. The total time resolution of MePS (pulsing system + detector) was 230 ps (FWHM) during the experiment. The time resolution was stable over time and the range of implantation energies. A three-component decomposition was used to fit all lifetime spectra into three resolved lifetime components with a good accuracy of χ 2 1.20 for the unconstrained fits. The three-component decomposition provided the best statistical fit, while other combinations either failed to converge or resulted in higher χ 2 values. The uncertainties reported in this work for the lifetime and intensity values correspond to the statistical errors from the fitting procedure. The starting values and the channel ranges were kept constant for all spectra.
For the drift-assisted PALS experiment, positron lifetime spectra were recorded as a function of implantation energy at varying applied voltages from 30 V to 30 V . This voltage range proved stable against breakdown, and the maximum voltages generate a sufficiently strong electric field of over 1 M V cm 1 in the oxide layer, where a strong drift effect on positrons has been demonstrated in previous Doppler experiments [19,22].
An Iseg DPS High Precision HV module was used to apply the gate bias. Table 1 lists the applied gate voltages U g along with the corresponding electric fields E ox = U g / d ox across the buried oxide, where d ox is the oxide thickness.
The voltage U g was applied between the Al gate on top of the SiO2 layer and the ohmic Al contact at the back of the Si substrate, which was grounded. Due to the mismatch between the work functions of Al and Si, a built-in potential is established. This potential gives rise to an electric field across the oxide and causes band bending in the near-surface region of the semiconductor, even when no external voltage is applied. By applying the flatband voltage U fb , this built-in potential can be compensated, resulting in the flatband condition, which represents the electrically undisturbed, field-free state of the MOS structure. Figure 1 shows a schematic illustration of how different gate voltages U g , relative to the flatband voltage U fb , influence the electronic behavior of the MOS structure. It shows the electric field in the MOS capacitor, including the directions of the electric field, and the resulting positron drift for the different bias conditions. The positron affinity χ + of the defect-free material layers is depicted schematically at the bottom of Figure 1 [27].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Comparison of the Decay Spectra for the Bare and Buried Oxide

Figure 2 shows the comparison of the normalized positron (e+) lifetime spectra of the bare oxide at 2 keV and the MOS structure at 4 keV for three bias voltage conditions: open circuit 0 V , 30 V and 30 V . The distinct bias conditions provide direct evidence of the impact of the electric field on the oxide’s annihilation characteristics. The comparison of the decay spectra for U g = 0 V for bare oxide on silicon at 2 keV (green curve) and buried oxide at 4 keV (red curve) shows that the decay in the time range of 5 10 ns is affected by the deposition of the aluminum gate on the buried oxide. The presence of the Al gate lowers the intensity of the longest component without any significant effect on the decay slope and thus on the positron lifetime in the SiO2 layer.
It can be observed by comparing the red, blue and black curves, that the intensity of the longest component in the 5–10 ns range decreases with the magnitude of U g , from 0–30 V, independent of the polarity. Remarkably, the slope remains quasi-constant, independent of the magnitude and polarity of U g . In the 1–1.6 ns range, the curves of the MOS capacitor show a different trend depending on U g as depicted in the inlay of Figure 2. This indicates that for short decay times, the effect of the gate voltage is dependent on the magnitude and polarity of U g and leads to different annihilation characteristics. This suggests the presence of distinct positron annihilation modes near the Al/SiO2 and SiO2/Si interfaces, respectively.

3.2. Positron Annihilation Quantum States in the Bare Oxide Stack

3.2.1. Annihilation Characteristic of the Bare Oxide Layer

Figure 3 shows a decay spectrum of the bare oxide layer analyzed with a pulsed positron beam of 2 keV . Due to the low mobility of positrons in the oxide, their annihilation occurs predominantly within the SiO2 near-surface region, resulting in minimal contributions from the silicon substrate or the surface itself. This allows us to observe the undisturbed annihilation characteristics of SiO2. The blue dots correspond to the measured decay spectrum. The spectrum with the green dots given by a limited time window is fitted by a model function D exp of the form:
D exp ( t ) = I R F i = 1 3 I i τ i e t / τ i + B
In the actual spectrum, D exp is decomposed into a sum of three exponential decay components of lifetimes τ i and intensities I i , convoluted with the instrument resolution function I R F . In addition, a constant background B is added. Accurate extraction of the lifetime components requires optimizing the time resolution to be as small as possible and determining the I R F as precisely as possible. The colored dashed lines correspond to the exponential decay components extracted from the fit.
The three lifetime components, indicated by colored dashed lines in Figure 3, include two lifetimes above 500 ps identified as τ 2 = 595 ( 6 ) ps and τ 3 = 1563 ( 3 ) ps , which together contribute 77% to the total spectrum. The shortest lifetime, τ 1 = 137 ( 1 ) ps , accounts for roughly a quarter of the resolved annihilation signal.
Positron lifetimes above 500 ps can be attributed to the annihilation of ortho-positronium (o-Ps), a hydrogen-like bound state of an electron and a positron [28]. Positronium formation is commonly observed in nanometer or sub-nanometer voids in materials such as amorphous insulators and polymers. Two spin states of Ps exist: the singlet state, known as para-Ps, which annihilates via two-gamma emission with a vacuum lifetime of 125 ps , and the triplet state, known as ortho-Ps, which annihilates via three-gamma emission with a vacuum lifetime of 142 ns [29]. However, in condensed matter, the lifetime of o-Ps is typically reduced to a few nanoseconds due to the processes of positronium pick-off annihilation with the surrounding electrons of the material by two-gamma emission or other quenching mechanisms [30,31,32]. Spin statistics demands the formation ratio of p-Ps to o-Ps in vacuum to be 1:3 [29,33].
It follows that the long component, τ 3 = 1558 ( 3 ) ps and I 3 = 52(1)%, is attributed to the pick-off annihilation of ortho-positronium (o-Ps) in open-volume defects. The intermediate component, τ 2 = 585 ( 6 ) ps and I 2 = 25(1)%, includes contributions from both o-Ps pick-off annihilation within the oxide layer and the annihilation of free positrons. The shortest component, τ 1 = 136 ( 2 ) ps and I 1 = 23(1)%, is related either to the self-annihilation of para-positronium (p-Ps) in the oxide, or, to the annihilation of free positrons, depending on the implantation energy. Since all lifetime components originate at least partly from positronium annihilation, it can be concluded that positronium formation is a dominant physical process in the oxide.

3.2.2. Depth Profile of the Bare Oxide Sample

Figure 4 shows the three-component decomposition as a function of the implantation energy. As a depth reference, the oxide-equivalent mean implantation depth z ¯ is shown on the secondary x-axis. The oxide layer is highlighted in purple, and the lines connecting the data points serve as guides to the eye.
We observe that, with increasing implantation energy, the lifetime of the first component (blue) increases from 137 ps to 215 ps . The largest change occurs between 4 keV and 6 keV . The intensity of the first component also increases steadily with increasing implantation energy, with the most pronounced rise occurring at the transition from the oxide to the semiconductor layer.
The lifetime of the second component (red) initially increases between 1 keV and 2 keV and then continuously decreases until the energy is reached where the mean penetration depth matches the interface of the oxide. For higher energies, it remains nearly constant. The intensity of the second component shows maxima at 1 keV and 4.5 keV . Its intensity decreases slightly inside the oxide, while it continuously decreases outside the oxide.
The lifetime of the third component (green) first increases in the same energy range as the second component and then steadily decreases with increasing implantation energy. Its intensity initially increases slightly and reaches a maximum of I 3 = 52% between 2 keV and 3 keV . As the oxide/semiconductor interface is approached, its intensity decreases to 5%.
It is well documented in the literature that positronium (Ps) annihilation is generally an annihilation mode that does not occur in conductive materials such as aluminum and silicon [30]. Thus, Ps annihilation mode as para-Ps or ortho-Ps with the relation of I o / I p = 3 , can be safely attributed to the SiO2 or SiO2/Si interface.
This interpretation is supported by the parallel behavior of I 1 and I 3 at implantation energies below 3 keV in Figure 4. Additionally, the ratio I 3 / I 1 2.5 aligns with the expected formation ratio. With increasing positron fraction in the silicon—above 4 keV —the intensity of the o-Ps component decreases and I 1 increases sharply and approaches the lifetime expected in defect-free silicon [34,35].
At an implantation energy of 1 keV , surface effects are still visible in all three components. In particular, τ 2 shows a typical surface lifetime of about 400 ps [36,37]. As the energy increases, I 2 decreases because fewer positrons annihilate in surface states. However, between 3 keV and 5 keV , I 2 increases while simultaneously the o-Ps intensity I 3 decreases as the fraction of positrons in the substrate increases and more positrons can reach the SiO2/Si interface via back-diffusion. Above 5 keV , I 2 drops to nearly zero as the positron fraction in the oxide and the near-surface interface region decreases with the implantation energy. The trends observed in I 2 and I 3 suggest that open-volume defects dominate the microstructure of the oxide, while no such defects are present in the silicon.
The lifetime value of τ 1 is longer then the vacuum lifetime ( 125 ps ) of p-Ps. This indicates that other annihilation modes could contribute to the short lifetime component. They most likely arise from the 2 γ annihilation mode of unbound positron-electron pairs, i.e., free positron annihilation. This gives rise to an unknown component τ 1 . We use a simple model, which utilizes the positron formation ratio to extract the unknown lifetime τ 1 as follows:
τ 1 = ( I 1 τ 1 I p τ p ) / ( I 1 I p )
This model assumes that the p-Ps lifetime is equal to the vacuum lifetime of τ p = 125 ps with an intensity I p = I 3 / 3 . For the lifetime component, τ 1 and I 1 , the calculated values extracted from Equation (2) are τ 1 = 169.9 ps and I 1 = 5.7%.
Similar lifetimes and intensities were reported for crystalline, vitreous bulk [38] or thin layers [20]. The most striking comparison to the literature is for the calculated lifetime component, τ 1 and I 1 . Such a lifetime of about ≈ 160 ps has been reported for an crystalline SiO2 with a much higher intensity of about 25% [38]. This leads to the assumption that in the SiO2 system investigated in this work, some precipitates of crystalline silica are embedded in the amorphous SiO2 network.

3.3. Positron Annihilation Quantum States in the MOS Capacitor

The evolution of the lifetime components in the different layers of the MOS capacitor can be seen in Figure 5. We investigate the MOS capacitor under three different gate voltages, namely 0 V and the two extreme cases of 30 V and 30 V . As a depth reference, the oxide-equivalent mean implantation depth z ¯ is shown on the secondary axis, and the different MOS layers are highlighted using colors (blue for aluminum and purple for the oxide). In this graph, the different colors of the data points correspond to the different gate voltage configurations. The lines connecting the data points are intended as eye guides.
Under open-circuit conditions, the first lifetime component decreases from 202 ( 2 ) ps at 2 keV to a minimum of 134 ( 4 ) ps , then increases for energies above 5.5 keV . Its intensity follows a parabolic trend, with a minimum of 14% at 4.5 keV . The second component increases from 453 ( 3 ) ps in the aluminum ( 2 keV ) to 495 ( 2 ) ps in the oxide, then slightly decreases for higher energies. Its intensity reaches a maximum of 66(1)% at 6 keV , followed by a decrease to 38(1)%. The third component lifetime decreases from 1495 ( 4 ) ps to 1363 ( 10 ) ps with increasing energy, while its intensity peaks at 39(1)% in the oxide and drops to 4(1)% at 11 keV .
Under negative gate bias ( 30 V ), the first component behaves similar to the open circuit condition but with higher lifetimes between 2 keV and 6 keV . We observe a parabolic intensity minimum at 5 keV and for higher energies, the intensity increases to a maximum of 52(1)% at 11 keV . The second component remains nearly constant between 470 ps and 478 ps , with intensity increasing to 83(1)% at the oxide–semiconductor interface, then decreasing to 46(1)%. The third component lifetime decreases to 1270 ( 17 ) ps , while its intensity follows a similar trend as under open-circuit conditions, but with a lower peak at 15(1)%.
With positive gate bias ( 30 V ), the first component reaches a minimum of 192 ( 7 ) ps at 3.5 keV , then increases up to 240 ps . Its intensity drops to 12(1)%, then rises to 95(1)% at the highest energy. The second component stays around 435 ps below 5.5 keV and increases to 543 ( 24 ) ps , with intensity peaking at 75(1)% before dropping to 4(1)%. The third component lifetime decreases moderately to 1422 ( 25 ) ps , and its intensity remains similar to the negative bias case, with a slightly lower maximum of 13(1)%.
Figure 5 unambiguously shows the effect of the electric field on the lifetime components as a function of implantation energy. The blue curve ( 0 V ) serves as the reference measurement and shows that the annihilation characteristics are only affected by diffusion. In the oxide, the diffusion is very limited with a diffusion length of ≈10 nm [39] and thus, oxide-thermalized positrons annihilate close to their location of thermalization. We can summarize the annihilation modes based on their energy as follows:
  • free positron annihilation in the Al-gate for E imp 2 keV .
  • positronium and free positron annihilation in the oxide between 2 keV E imp 5 keV .
  • free positron annihilation in the substrate for E imp 5.5 keV .
All lifetimes and intensities from the different gate voltage conditions show a similar starting point at 2 keV . However, the variation in τ and I is the first indicator of a positron drift. We can conclude this since a fraction of positrons is already implanted into the oxide and thus drifts to either one of the interfaces. The lifetimes and intensities for energies between 2.5 keV and 4.5 keV can be attributed to positrons mainly annihilating in the oxide of the MOS capacitor. For 0 V , the intensity of the o-Ps component is highest, effectively reducing the contribution of the other two annihilation modes. When a gate voltage is applied, the intensity of the o-Ps component reduces significantly by ≈60%. This decrease depends only on the electric field strength and not on the direction. We can conclude that the application of the electric field greatly inhibits the formation of o-Ps.
Another observation in Figure 5 is the deviation of I 1 and I 2 at around 3.5 keV for the two biased measurement. First, they show the same trend, suggesting that positrons see the same amount of defects, but with different defect sizes. This suggests that vacancy clusters might be the main defect type in the SiO2 layer. The size of these vacancy clusters varies with the location of positron annihilation within the oxide. They become smaller as the positrons annihilate closer to the SiO2/Si interface. In Figure 5 above 3.5 keV , the intensities, I 1 and I 2 , of the 30 V measurement starts to differ from the 30 V measurement. With increasing implantation energy, a larger fraction of positrons is implanted into the silicon substrate. This fraction then drifts in the near-surface electric field of the silicon layer. For negative gate voltages, the positrons in the oxide still drift to the gate electrode, and positrons in the substrate get drifted back to the SiO2/Si interface, increasing the intensity I 2 of vacancy clusters present at the interface. For positive gate voltages, positrons in the oxide get drifted to the SiO2 interface, and substrate-implanted positrons get drifted into the silicon bulk. However, the increase in positron fraction in the substrate alone does not fully explain the intensity change between 3.5 keV and 4 keV :
The positron fraction, F o x , that stops in the oxide remains constant at approximately 80% for both energies. The positron fraction, F S i , stopping in the silicon substrate increases by 6% from 3.5 keV to 4 keV . This increase is smaller than the observed change in intensity, Δ I 1 14(1)%, from 12(1)% to 26(1)%. Therefore, the rise in intensity cannot be attributed solely to annihilation in the silicon substrate. Instead, this change likely includes contributions from annihilation within the oxide. Given its dependence on both implantation depth and electric field strength, this annihilation mode is likely associated with the microstructure near the SiO2/Si interface.
Above implantation energies of 4.5 keV , the intensity of the first component begins to align with the increasing positron fraction in the substrate, indicating that both lifetimes and intensities are primarily influenced by the electric field in the near-surface region of the silicon layer. At 0 V and 30 V , positrons reach the interface through back-diffusion and drift, respectively. At 30 V , Figure 5 clearly shows a trend consistent with defect-free bulk silicon, as positrons are drifted deeper into the substrate. The drift behavior in the silicon substrate will be discussed in a separate publication.

3.4. Positron Annihilation Quantum States in the Buried Oxide of the MOS Capacitor

The energy-dependent data in Figure 5 suggest a change in annihilation characteristics, possibly linked to the SiO2/Si interface. To investigate the field-induced variations in the relative contributions of Ps and free e+ annihilation, we need to examine how the three lifetime components depend on the applied gate voltage U g .
Figure 6 presents the results of the lifetime analysis as a function of gate voltage for an implantation energy of 4 keV . At that energy the mean implantation range is in the middle of the SiO2 layer, and about ≈80% of the positrons are stopped in the oxide layer. Thus, the number of positrons affected by the drift is maximized. The secondary axis indicates the corresponding electric field within the SiO2 layer derived from the applied gate voltage. The different drift regimes (see Figure 1) are highlighted using colored boxes: red (Al direction) drift to Al/SiO2 interface; white (flatband range) no distinct drift direction; blue (Si direction) drift to SiO2/Si interface.
The shortest lifetime component (blue dots), τ 1 , exhibits a distinct minimum at U g = 0 V of τ 1 = 149 ( 5 ) ps . As the drift toward the Al gate increases (from U g = 30 V to 0 V ), τ 1 increases to 195 ( 8 ) ps . In the opposite drift direction—toward the Si substrate –, τ 1 increases sharply to 203 ( 4 ) ps at U g = 1 V , and continues rising to 255 ( 7 ) ps at U g = 30 V . The intensity I 1 increases gradually from 10(2)% at U g = 30 V to a maximum of 23(2)% at U g = 30 V .
The intermediate lifetime (green squares), τ 2 , remains relatively stable in both drift directions. It averages 483 ( 9 ) ps for negative voltages and unter flatband condition and drops to 445 ( 10 ) ps for positive voltages. However, its intensity, I 2 , decreases significantly from 77% to 48% as U g increases from 30 V to 3 V . For gate voltages in the flatband range, I 2 stabilizes at approximately 49%. As the field increases in the Si direction, I 2 rises again and levels off at around 60% between U g = 20 V and 30 V .
The longest lifetime component (red triangles), τ 3 peaks at 1490 ( 5 ) ps within the flatband range. Outside this range, in both the Al direction and Si direction, τ 3 decreases linearly by about 3%. The corresponding intensity, I 3 , also drops symmetrically with increasing field strength. It declines from 36% at U g = 0 V to 15% at U g = 30 V and to 13% at U g = 30 V .

3.4.1. Drift Transport in SiO2

Two key considerations govern the drift in the oxide layer of the MOS capacitor. First, the electric field can only act on free positrons. Second, the difference in positron affinities between the oxide and the adjacent layers—illustrated in Figure 1—creates a potential well that confines positrons within the oxide [27,40,41]. Thus, the kinetic energy gained from the electric field used in this experiment is insufficient to overcome this drift barrier with Δ E 4 eV . We use transport estimations similar to charge carriers in semiconductors or metals and calculate the transit time t d a free positron needs to traverse the 180 ( 10 ) nm oxide layer in an electric field of 1.6   MV cm 1 . The most recent calculation of the positron mobility in SiO2 was reported to be μ + = 1.20 ( 9 ) cm 2 V 1 s 1 by Petkov et al. [22]. This mobility value results from fitting the drift-diffusion equation for positrons to the experimental Doppler broadening spectroscopy data. The authors also note that the determination of the diffusion constant through this fitting procedure is subject to significant uncertainty, which in turn leads to a large uncertainty in the extracted mobility. This, along with reports of much lower mobility values in the literature [17], suggests that either the fitting method or the oxide fabrication process has a substantial impact on the positron mobility. Therefore, these drift estimates should be regarded as qualitative and interpreted with caution.
With an electric field of E = 1.6   MV cm 1 , we can calculate the mean drift velocity of positrons v d = μ + E = 1.92 × 10 4   ms 1 . Such a velocity results in an oxide transit time of t d 9 ps . This would suggest that positrons are transported rapidly through the oxide. As Petkov et al. already discussed, the electric field results in a minor addition to the total kinetic energy of thermalized positrons (≈5% in our case) and thus the de Broglie wavelength is still larger than the dimension of the defects and trapping should not be influenced drastically by the drift. However, the experimental results suggest otherwise, since a significant change in the annihilation characteristics is observed even at moderate fields (see Figure 6). This was explained by elastic scattering dominating over inelastic scattering processes, i.e., the excitation of transversal optical phonons [22]. As a result, each scattering event results in insufficient energy loss, requiring multiple interactions before a positron can be effectively trapped at a defect site. Moreover, the electric field within the oxide continuously accelerates positrons between scattering events, further reducing the likelihood of trapping. For weak electric fields, the flatband range in Figure 6, the drift effect is explained by the transport of epithermal positrons, effectively shifting the implantation profile before the thermalization is completed [22].

3.4.2. Drift Effect on Positronium Annihilation

First, we give a comparison between the o-Ps annihilation in the bare oxide and the buried oxide at an applied gate voltage of 0 V . The contribution of the ortho-positronium mode is maximal when the fraction of oxide positrons is maximal and the internal electric field is small or zero. The small variation of the lifetime (≈5%) between the buried oxide and the bare oxide at 0 V indicates that the o-Ps pick-off process is similar for both oxides. The huge relative difference in intensity (≈16%) suggests that the o-Ps annihilation is suppressed in the buried oxide. An explanation for the observed reduction in o-Ps intensity is the superposition of two contributing factors: First, the existing intrinsic electric field at 0 V in the buried oxide. Second, the fraction of positrons not thermalized in the oxide.
The application of a gate voltage strongly reduces ortho-positronium (o-Ps) annihilation, regardless of whether the voltage is positive or negative. This is shown by the decrease in o-Ps intensity, I 3 , in Figure 6 as the electric field becomes stronger. The relative reduction is 64% from I 3 = 36(1)% to 13(1)%. This reduction can be explained by charge separation, where the electric field separates the free electrons—generated during the thermalization of the positron—from the positron itself before positronium formation can occur [42]. In comparison, the change in o-Ps lifetime with applied voltage is small, only about 2%. A proportional reduction is expected for the intensity of the para-positronium (p-Ps) component. Figure 6 shows this is true for negative, but not for positive voltages. For positive voltages, the increase in I 1 suggests that another positron annihilation process becomes stronger as positrons drift toward the SiO2/Si interface. However, the lifetime τ 1 increases for both polarities to a lifetime higher than 125 ps . This increase in τ 1 indicates that a new annihilation mode becomes observable, which was hidden by Ps formation at zero-field conditions and now dominates when Ps formation is suppressed. The asymmetric change in I 1 suggests that this annihilation process occurs more often near the SiO2/Si interface.
The continuous reduction of the o-Ps annihilation is observed as the internal field of the SiO2 layer increases to field strengths above ≈ 0.2 MV / cm (see Table 2). This is in agreement with previous investigations in α -SiO2 and polymer materials [42,43]. The Ps suppression is consistent with an internal field that either inhibits Ps formation during thermalization or during the trapping process. However, the lifetime spectra alone do not provide sufficient information to unambiguously identify the dominant process.

3.4.3. Free Positron Annihilation Induced by e+ Drift

As we elaborated in the previous section, the suppression of positronium formation by the drift effect leads to the generation of free positrons that can be trapped in defects. This is evidenced by the increase in the intensity I 2 of the vacancy cluster component in both drift directions (Figure 5 and Figure 6). Additionally, we identified an increase in the short component for positive gate voltages, which suggests that an unknown defect lifetime is superimposed on the p-Ps annihilation and cannot be resolved through conventional PALS analysis. Therefore, we apply the simple model from Equation (2) to extract the unresolved lifetime ( τ 1 and I 1 ) from the short component. Figure 7 shows the estimation of τ 1 and I 1 over the whole gate voltage range. The calculated values are listed in Table 3.
The observations presented in Figure 7 can be classified into three distinct regions, each corresponding to a different positron drift regime:
  • Al direction ( 30 V U g 10 V ): τ 1 remains quasi-constant with an average lifetime of 301 ( 7 ) ps and average intensity I 1 = 2.8(3)%. This is also the case for the medium oxide lifetime with an average value of τ 2 = 481 ( 2 ) ps . The intensity I 2 decreases from 77.1(5)% to 62.0(3)%.
  • Flatband range ( 3 V U g 0 V ): τ 1 and I 1 is quasi-constant at 236 ( 2 ) ps and 5(2)%, respectively. This is also observed for the medium oxide component with mean values 485 ( 5 ) ps and 48(4)%.
  • Si direction ( 1 V U g 30 V ): τ 1 , remains quasi-constant with a mean value of 274 ( 7 ) ps whereas the intensity, I 1 , increases from 10.8% to 21.7%. The medium oxide lifetime, τ 2 , remains quasi-constant with a mean value of 445 ( 5 ) ps , whereas the intensity, I 2 , slowly increases from 49(20)% at 1 V to 61(2)% for U g 20 V .
Both lifetimes remain below the Ps average lifetime limit of 500 ps at any gate voltage [30]. The variation of those two components with the applied electric field shows that free positrons can probe different electronic environments in the amorphous SiO2 network.

3.4.4. Microstructure of the Buried Oxide

Analyzing the influence of positron drift on the lifetime spectra enables insights into the microstructure of the oxide that are not accessible under zero-field conditions, where o-Ps annihilation dominates the spectra and obscures other annihilation channels.
In Figure 7 the correlation of the lifetime components ( τ 1 , I 1 , τ 2 and I 2 ) with the gate voltage U g is consistent with the existence of positron annihilation states arising from two categories of sub-nano void populations.
  • Population of smaller defects V s related to τ 1 and I 1 .
  • Population of larger defects (voids) V b related to τ 2 and I 2 .
The strength and direction of the electric field influence the type of voids where positrons annihilate. At higher electric fields, between 0.5–1.7 MV/cm, the size of the open spaces in the two types of sub-nanometer voids tends to be smaller when positrons drift toward silicon (Si) compared to aluminum (Al). This is shown by shorter lifetimes related to V s and V b when the gate voltage changes from U g = 30 V to U g = 30 V . For the smaller voids ( V s ), the lifetime increases by 9%, accompanied by an intensity increase of up to ≈700%. In contrast, for the larger voids ( V b ), the lifetime decreases by 7%, while the intensity drops by approximately 24%. This difference in void size and its effect on positron annihilation shows that the electric field gives insight into uneven distributions of the sub-nanometer voids. As the internal field strength decreases from the Al direction to the flatband range, the lifetime τ 1 linked to the V s voids drops clearly, from 301 ps to 239 ps . This decrease of approximately 20% remains unclear.
As previously stated, free positrons exhibit a higher capture rate in the smaller void population ( V s ) when drifted towards the SiO2/Si interface than when drifted towards the Al/SiO2 interface. This behavior can have multiple possible explanations.
One is the gradual densification along the oxidation direction, from the Al/SiO2 interface to the SiO2/Si interface [21]. Another possibility is enhanced trapping in near-interface defects, such as silicon dangling bonds ( P b centers) [44,45]. P b centers at the interface of thermally oxidized, p-doped Si(100) have already been identified as possible interface defects using two-dimensional angular correlation spectroscopy (2D-ACAR) [46]. Two mechanisms may explain the increase in intensity I 1 . First, positron drift could simply transport more positrons to the interface region, leading to increased trapping at P b centers. Second, electrons accumulated on the silicon side in inversion may change the charge state of P b centers through charge carrier trapping. Since positrons are insensitive to positively charged defects, this charge state switching could increase trapping by converting previously positive P b centers into effective trapping sites. However, based on current data, a definitive explanation for the increase in the intensity of the small void population cannot be given.
In summary, when the electric field is strong enough to suppress positronium formation, the open volume size and the density of voids primarily govern free positron trapping and annihilation. In cases where positronium annihilation dominates, other annihilation channels remain hidden. These channels become accessible only when the positron drift reduces the formation probability of positronium.

4. Conclusions

Drift-assisted Positron Annihilation Lifetime Spectroscopy (PALS) was performed on a Metal-Oxide-Silicon capacitor under gate bias of up to ± 30 V . The maximum achieved electric field in the 180 ( 10 ) nm SiO2 layer was 1.72 MV / cm . Positron lifetime spectra were recorded as a function of implantation energy and applied gate voltage, and analyzed using a three-component decomposition. The lifetime analysis revealed clear evidence of electric field-induced positron drift within the buried oxide of the MOS capacitor.
The most significant finding was a pronounced suppression of positronium (Ps) formation with increasing field strength, leading to enhanced annihilation of free positrons. This suppression uncovered two distinct populations of sub-nanometer voids that are otherwise obscured by Ps annihilation. As the electric field increases, the o-Ps contribution diminishes while annihilation in one or both void populations becomes more prominent. Moreover, a clear dependence on the direction of the electric field was observed. Drift towards the Al/SiO2 interface predominantly enhanced trapping in the larger voids, with a mean lifetime of 481 ( 3 ) ps . Drift towards the SiO2/Si interface also increased annihilation in this population, albeit with a shorter mean lifetime of 445 ( 3 ) ps . Notably, this drift direction additionally revealed a second, smaller void population, characterized by an average lifetime of 275 ( 7 ) ps , which did not appear during drift towards the Al interface.
The observed directional dependencies in the lifetimes and intensities indicate spatial inhomogeneities in the distribution of sub-nanometer voids within the buried oxide layer. This shows the potential of this method for future application on oxide/semiconductor layered system using novel oxide materials, such as HfO2 or Gd2O3.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.H. and W.E.; validation, W.E., C.C. and J.M.; formal analysis, R.H.; investigation, R.H., J.M. and M.D.; methodology, M.B., M.O.L. and A.W.; resources, K.L. and G.S.D.; writing—original draft preparation, R.H. and P.S.; writing—review and editing, G.D., C.C. and M.M.; visualization, R.H.; supervision, W.E.; project administration, R.H.; funding acquisition, G.D. and M.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by BMBF-POSILIFE (grant number: 05K19WN1), BMBF-POSISCAN (grant number: 05K22WN1) and the University of the Bundeswehr Munich.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author due to planned follow-up research.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank dtec.bw—Digitalization and Technology-Research Center of the Bundeswehr for support (project VITAL-SENSE). dtec.bw was funded via the German Recovery and Resilience Plan by the European Union (NextGenerationEU). Parts of this research were carried out at ELBE at the Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf e.V., a member of the Helmholtz Association.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Yan, A.; Wang, C.; Yan, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, E.; Dong, Y.; Yan, Z.; Lu, T.; Cui, T.; Li, D.; et al. Thin-Film Transistors for Integrated Circuits: Fundamentals and Recent Process. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2304409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fortunato, E.; Barquinha, P.; Martins, R. Oxide Semiconductor Thin-Film Transistors: A Review of Recent Advances. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 2945–2986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kuo, Y. Thin Film Transistor Technology—Past, Present, and Future. Electrochem. Soc. Interface 2013, 22, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yuvaraja, S.; Faber, H.; Kumar, M.; Xiao, N.; Garcia, G.I.M.; Tang, X.; Anthopoulos, T.D.; Li, X. Three-dimensional integrated metal-oxide transistors. Nat. Electron. 2024, 7, 768–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, S.; Liu, X.; Xu, M.; Liu, L.; Yang, D.; Zhou, P. Two-demensional devices and integration towards the silicon lines. Nat. Mat. 2022, 21, 1225–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lau, C.S.; Das, S.; Verzhbitskiy, I.A.; Huang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Talha-Dean, T.; Fu, W.; Venkatakrishnarao, D.; Goh, K.E.J. Dielectrics for Two-Dimensional Transition-Metal Dichalcogenide Applications. ASC Nano 2023, 17, 9870–9905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Yin, L.; Cheng, R.; Wan, X.; Ding, J.; Jia, J.; Wen, Y.; Liu, X.; He, J. High-k monocrystalline dielectrics for low-power two-dimensional electronics. Nat. Mat. 2024, 24, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Stassin, T.; Verbeke, R.; Cruz, A.J.; Rodriguez-Hermida, S.; Stassen, I.; Marreiros, J.; Krishtab, M.; Dickmann, M.; Egger, W.; Vankelecom, I.F.J.; et al. Porosimetry for Thin-Films of Metal-Organic Frameworks: A Comparison of Positron Annihilation Lifetime Spectroscopy and Adsorption-Based Mehtods. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2006993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Keeble, D.J.; Wiktor, J.; Pathak, S.K.; Phillips, L.J.; Dickmann, M.; Durose, K.; Snaith, H.; Egger, W. Identification of lead vacancy defects in lead halide perovskites. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 5566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Dickmann, M.; Mathes, L.; Helm, R.; Burwitz, V.V.; Egger, W.; Mitteneder, J.; Hugenschmidt, C.; Sperr, P.; Butterling, M.; Liedke, M.O.; et al. Identification and Reversible Optical Switching of NV+ Centers in Diamond. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025. early view. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Egger, W. Pulsed low-energy positron beams in materials sciences. In Physics with Many Positrons, Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi”; IOS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010; pp. 419–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nielsen, B.; Lynn, K.G.; Chen, Y.; Welch, D.O. SiO2/Si interface probed with a variable-energy positron beam. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1987, 51, 1022–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fujinami, M.; Chilton, N.B.; Ishii, K.; Ohki, Y. Study of defects in silicon dioxide films on Si(100) by a variable-energy positron beam. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1993, 74, 5406–5409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Uedono, A.; Wei, L.; Tanagawa, S.; Suzuki, R.; Ohgaki, H.; Mikado, T.; Ohji, Y. Positronium formation in SiO2 films grown on Si substrates studied by monoenergetic positron beams. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1994, 75, 3822–3828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Suzuki, R.; Ohdaira, T.; Kobayashi, Y.; Ito, K.; Shioya, Y.; Ishimura, T. Positron and positronium annihilation in silica-based thin films studied by a pulsed positron beam. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2003, 68, 339–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Uedono, A.; Tanigawa, S.; Ohji, Y. Metal/oxide/semiconductor interface investigated by monoenergetic positrons. Phys. Lett. A 1988, 133, 82–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kong, Y.; Leung, T.C.; Asoka-Kumar, P.; Lynn, K.G. Positron mobility in thermally grown SiO2 measured by Doppler broadening technique. J. Appl. Phys. 1991, 70, 2874–2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Asoka-Kumar, P.; Lynn, K.G.; Welch, D.O. Characterization of defects in Si and SiO2/Si using positrons. J. Appl. Phys. 1994, 76, 4935–4982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Clement, M.; de Nijs, J.M.M.; Balk, P.; Schut, H.; van Veen, A. Transport of positrons in the electrically biased metal-oxide-silicon system. J. Appl. Phys. 1997, 81, 1943–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Suzuki, R.; Ohdaira, T.; Uedono, A.; Kobayashi, Y. Positron annihilation in SiO2–Si studied by a pulsed slow positron beam. Appl. Phys. Sci. 2002, 194, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Brauer, G.; Anwand, W.; Skorupa, W.; Revesz, A.G.; Kuriplach, J. Characterization of the SiO2/Si interface by positron annihilation spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 2002, 66, 195331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Petkov, M.P.; Lynn, K.G.; van Veen, A. Experimental and theoretical aspects of electric-field-assisted positron kinetics in metal-oxide-silicon systems. Phys. Rev. B 2002, 66, 045322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sperr, P.; Egger, W.; Kögel, G.; Dollinger, G.; Hugenschmidt, C.; Piochacz, C. Status of the pulsed low energy positron beam system (PLEPS) at the Munich Research Reactor FRM-II. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008, 255, 35–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wagner, A.; Butterling, M.; Liedke, M.O.; Potzger, K.; Krause-Rehberg, R. Positron annihilation lifetime and Doppler broadening spectroscopy at the ELBE facility. AIP Conf. Proc. 2018, 1970, 040003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hautojärvi, P.; Corbel, C. Positron Spectroscopy of Defects in Metals and Semiconductors. In Positron Spectroscopy of Solids, Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi”; IOS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1993; pp. 491–532. [Google Scholar]
  26. Schultz, P.J.; Lynn, K.G. Interaction of positron beams with surfaces, thin films, and interfaces. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1988, 60, 701–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Puska, M.J. Positron affinities for elemental metals. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 1989, 1, 6081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Seeger, A.; Banhart, F. On the Systematics of Positron Lifetimes in Metals. Phys. Stat. Sol. A 1987, 102, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. DeBenedetti, S.; Corben, H.C. Positronium. Ann. Rev. Nuc. Sci 1954, 4, 191–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hautojärvi, P. Positrons in Solids, 1st ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  31. Brandt, W.; Dupasquier, A. Positron Solid State Physics; Nort-Holland Publishing Company: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  32. Hyodo, T.; Nakayama, T.; Saito, H.; Saito, F.; Wada, K. The quenching of ortho-positronium. Phys. Status Solidi 2009, 6, 2497–2502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Heitler, W. The Quantum Theory of Radiation, 3rd ed.; Dover Publications: Mineola, NY, USA, 1953. [Google Scholar]
  34. Polity, A.; Börner, F.; Huth, S.; Eichler, S.; Krause-Rehberg, R. Defects in electron-irradiated Si studied by positron-lifetime spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 1998, 58, 10363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kawasuso, A.; Hasegawa, M.; Suezawa, M.; Yamaguchi, S.; Sumino, K. Studies of divacancy in Si using positron lifetime measurement. Hyperfine Interact. 1994, 84, 397–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Puska, M.J.; Nieminen, R.M. Theory of positrons in solids and on solid surfaces. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1994, 66, 841–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kögel, G. Positron Annihilation at Clean Metallic Surfaces. Mat. Sci. Forum 1991, 105–110, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hasegawa, M.; Saneyasu, M.; Tabata, M.; Tang, Z.; Nagai, Y.; Chiba, T.; Ito, Y. Positron and positronium studies of irradiation-induced defects and microvoids in vitreous metamict silica. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 2000, 166–167, 431–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Petegem, S.V.; Dauwe, C.; Hoecke, T.V.; Baerdemaeker, J.D.; Segers, D. Diffusion length of positrons and positronium investigated using a positron beam with longitudinal geometry. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 70, 115410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Boev, O.V.; Puska, M.J.; Nieminen, R.M. Electron and positron levels in solids. Phys. Rev. B 1987, 36, 7786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Kuriplach, J.; Anwand, W.; Brauer, G.; Skorupa, W. Positron characteristics of various SiO2 polymorphs. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2002, 194, 84–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Stepanov, S.V.; Byakov, V.M.; Kobayashi, Y. Positronium formation in molecular media: The effect of the external electric field. Phys. Rev. B 2005, 72, 054205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kobayashi, Y.; Wang, C.L.; Hirata, K.; Kouchi, N. Electric field dependent positronium formation in alpha-SiO2. Mat. Sci. Forum 2001, 363–365, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Caplan, P.J.; Poindexter, E.H.; Deal, B.E.; Razouk, R.R. ESR centers, interface sates, and oxide fixed charge in thermally oxidized silicon wafers. J. Appl. Phys. 1979, 50, 5847–5854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Poindexter, E.H.; Caplan, P.J.; Deal, B.E.; Razouk, R.R. Interface states and electron spin resonance centers in thermally oxidized (111) and (100) silicon wafers. J. Appl. Phys. 1981, 52, 879–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Peng, J.P.; Lynn, K.G.; Asoka-Kumar, P.; Becker, D.P.; Harshman, D.R. Study of the SiO2-Si Interface Using Variable Energy Positron Two-Dimensional Angular Correlation of Annihilation Radiation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1995, 76, 2157–2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic presentation of the electric field, its direction, the drift direction, and the positron affinity in the MOS layers for different gate voltages relative to the flatband voltage U fb .
Figure 1. Schematic presentation of the electric field, its direction, the drift direction, and the positron affinity in the MOS layers for different gate voltages relative to the flatband voltage U fb .
Nanomaterials 15 01142 g001
Figure 2. PALS spectra of the bare oxide at 2 keV and the buried oxide at 4 keV for the three distinct bias voltages conditions, U g = 30 , 0 , 30 V in the range from 1 ns to 10 ns . The spectra are enlarged for short decay times ( 1 1.6 ns ). All spectra were measured with the same statistics of 1 × 10 7 counts/spectrum and are normalized to their area.
Figure 2. PALS spectra of the bare oxide at 2 keV and the buried oxide at 4 keV for the three distinct bias voltages conditions, U g = 30 , 0 , 30 V in the range from 1 ns to 10 ns . The spectra are enlarged for short decay times ( 1 1.6 ns ). All spectra were measured with the same statistics of 1 × 10 7 counts/spectrum and are normalized to their area.
Nanomaterials 15 01142 g002
Figure 3. Example decay spectrum with a three-component decomposition using Equation (1) for the bare oxide layer at an implantation energy of 2 keV . The blue dots represent the experimental data, the green dots indicate the data range used in the fit model, and the colored dashed lines correspond to the exponential decay components extracted from the fit.
Figure 3. Example decay spectrum with a three-component decomposition using Equation (1) for the bare oxide layer at an implantation energy of 2 keV . The blue dots represent the experimental data, the green dots indicate the data range used in the fit model, and the colored dashed lines correspond to the exponential decay components extracted from the fit.
Nanomaterials 15 01142 g003
Figure 4. Results of the three-component analysis of the bare oxide as a function of the implantation energy. As a depth reference, the oxide-equivalent mean implantation depth z ¯ is depicted on the secondary axis.
Figure 4. Results of the three-component analysis of the bare oxide as a function of the implantation energy. As a depth reference, the oxide-equivalent mean implantation depth z ¯ is depicted on the secondary axis.
Nanomaterials 15 01142 g004
Figure 5. Results of the three-component analysis of the buried oxide lifetime spectra as a function of implantation energy for three different applied gate voltages. As a depth reference, the oxide equivalent mean implantation depth z ¯ is depicted on the secondary axis. The different layers are indicated by colored boxes: blue for the Al layer, violet for the SiO2 layer, and white for the silicon substrate. The dashed lines between the data points are guides to the eye.
Figure 5. Results of the three-component analysis of the buried oxide lifetime spectra as a function of implantation energy for three different applied gate voltages. As a depth reference, the oxide equivalent mean implantation depth z ¯ is depicted on the secondary axis. The different layers are indicated by colored boxes: blue for the Al layer, violet for the SiO2 layer, and white for the silicon substrate. The dashed lines between the data points are guides to the eye.
Nanomaterials 15 01142 g005
Figure 6. Results of the three-component analysis of the lifetime spectra as a function of the applied gate bias at 4 keV. The drift directions are divided into Al direction (red), flatband range (white) and Si direction (blue). The theoretical electric field across the oxide is shown on the secondary axis. The experimental data are also presented in Table 2.
Figure 6. Results of the three-component analysis of the lifetime spectra as a function of the applied gate bias at 4 keV. The drift directions are divided into Al direction (red), flatband range (white) and Si direction (blue). The theoretical electric field across the oxide is shown on the secondary axis. The experimental data are also presented in Table 2.
Nanomaterials 15 01142 g006
Figure 7. Lifetimes τ p (blue), τ 2 (green) and intensities I p , I 2 as a function of the gate voltage U g . The estimated oxide component, τ 1 and I 1 from Equation (2), is shown in orange. The drift directions are divided into Al direction (red), flatband range (white), and Si direction (blue). The dashed lines are eye-guides.
Figure 7. Lifetimes τ p (blue), τ 2 (green) and intensities I p , I 2 as a function of the gate voltage U g . The estimated oxide component, τ 1 and I 1 from Equation (2), is shown in orange. The drift directions are divided into Al direction (red), flatband range (white), and Si direction (blue). The dashed lines are eye-guides.
Nanomaterials 15 01142 g007
Table 1. Summary of the applied gate voltage steps and their corresponding electric field over the 180 ( 10 ) nm oxide layer.
Table 1. Summary of the applied gate voltage steps and their corresponding electric field over the 180 ( 10 ) nm oxide layer.
U g [ V ] −30−17−10−3−2−10123101930
E ox [ MV / cm ] 1.62 0.89 0.51 0.12 0.06 0.01 0.05 0.11 0.16 0.22 0.61 1.11 1.72
Table 2. Summary of the results of the positron lifetime analysis for the three-component decomposition for the buried (MOS) and the bare oxide. The same initial fit parameters were used for all lifetime spectra. The uncertainty of the gate voltage is ± 0.5 V .
Table 2. Summary of the results of the positron lifetime analysis for the three-component decomposition for the buried (MOS) and the bare oxide. The same initial fit parameters were used for all lifetime spectra. The uncertainty of the gate voltage is ± 0.5 V .
U g E ox τ 1 I 1 τ 2 I 2 τ 3 I 3
[V] [MV/cm] [ps] [%] [ps] [%] [ps] [%]
30 1.62 193 ( 8 ) 8.1 ( 6 ) 479 ( 2 ) 77 ( 1 ) 1443 ( 5 ) 15 ( 1 )
17 0.89 175 ( 5 ) 9.7 ( 4 ) 481 ( 2 ) 70 ( 1 ) 1463 ( 3 ) 21 ( 1 )
10 0.51 170 ( 4 ) 12 ( 1 ) 484 ( 2 ) 62 ( 1 ) 1477 ( 3 ) 26 ( 1 )
3 0.12 167 ( 3 ) 18 ( 1 ) 491 ( 3 ) 48 ( 1 ) 1488 ( 3 ) 34 ( 2 )
2 0.06 162 ( 3 ) 17 ( 1 ) 480 ( 3 ) 48 ( 1 ) 1480 ( 3 ) 34 ( 2 )
1 0.01 164 ( 3 ) 18 ( 1 ) 478 ( 3 ) 48 ( 1 ) 1480 ( 3 ) 35 ( 2 )
0 0.05 149 ( 3 ) 15 ( 1 ) 491 ( 3 ) 49 ( 1 ) 1488 ( 3 ) 36 ( 2 )
1 0.11 203 ( 4 ) 22 ( 1 ) 469 ( 4 ) 49 ( 1 ) 1490 ( 3 ) 29 ( 2 )
2 0.16 204 ( 5 ) 19 ( 1 ) 441 ( 4 ) 52 ( 1 ) 1480 ( 3 ) 29 ( 1 )
3 0.22 211 ( 5 ) 21 ( 1 ) 449 ( 5 ) 50 ( 1 ) 1484 ( 3 ) 29 ( 2 )
10 0.61 224 ( 5 ) 23 ( 1 ) 446 ( 4 ) 55 ( 1 ) 1479 ( 3 ) 23 ( 1 )
19 1.11 222 ( 5 ) 21 ( 1 ) 447 ( 4 ) 62 ( 1 ) 1465 ( 4 ) 17 ( 1 )
30 1.72 255 ( 7 ) 26 ( 2 ) 442 ( 5 ) 61 ( 2 ) 1456 ( 5 ) 13 ( 1 )
bare oxide- 137 ( 1 ) 23 ( 1 ) 595 ( 6 ) 25 ( 1 ) 1563 ( 3 ) 52 ( 1 )
Table 3. Evolution of the short oxide component, τ 1 and I 1 calculated with Equation (2), and the mean values of the second component, τ ¯ 2 and I ¯ 2 , as a function of gate voltage. The relevant drift ranges for the evolution of the two components are color-coded: Al direction (blue), flatband range (white), and Si direction (red).
Table 3. Evolution of the short oxide component, τ 1 and I 1 calculated with Equation (2), and the mean values of the second component, τ ¯ 2 and I ¯ 2 , as a function of gate voltage. The relevant drift ranges for the evolution of the two components are color-coded: Al direction (blue), flatband range (white), and Si direction (red).
U g E ox τ 1 I 1 τ ¯ 2 I ¯ 2
[V] [MV/cm] [ps] [%] [ps] [%]
30 1.62 299 ( 24 ) 3.2 ( 6 ) 481 ( 3 ) 69 ( 7 )
17 0.89 297 ( 33 ) 2.8 ( 4 ) 481 ( 3 ) 69 ( 7 )
10 0.51 308 ( 40 ) 2.8 ( 4 ) 481 ( 3 ) 69 ( 7 )
3 0.12 236 ( 16 ) 7.0 ( 4 ) 485 ( 6 ) 48 ( 4 )
2 0.06 235 ( 18 ) 5.8 ( 4 ) 485 ( 6 ) 48 ( 4 )
1 0.01 237 ( 18 ) 6.1 ( 4 ) 485 ( 6 ) 48 ( 4 )
0 0.05 238 ( 27 ) 3.2 ( 3 ) 485 ( 6 ) 48 ( 4 )
1 0.11 268 ( 12 ) 12 ( 1 ) 445 ( 11 ) 55 ( 3 )
2 0.16 280 ( 15 ) 10 ( 1 ) 445 ( 11 ) 55 ( 3 )
3 0.22 285 ( 14 ) 12 ( 1 ) 445 ( 11 ) 55 ( 3 )
10 0.61 271 ( 8 ) 15 ( 1 ) 445 ( 11 ) 55 ( 3 )
19 1.11 258 ( 6 ) 15 ( 1 ) 445 ( 11 ) 55 ( 3 )
30 1.72 281 ( 4 ) 22 ( 1 ) 445 ( 11 ) 55 ( 3 )
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Helm, R.; Egger, W.; Corbel, C.; Sperr, P.; Butterling, M.; Wagner, A.; Liedke, M.O.; Mitteneder, J.; Mayerhofer, M.; Lee, K.; et al. Defect Studies in Thin-Film SiO2 of a Metal-Oxide-Silicon Capacitor Using Drift-Assisted Positron Annihilation Lifetime Spectroscopy. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 1142. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15151142

AMA Style

Helm R, Egger W, Corbel C, Sperr P, Butterling M, Wagner A, Liedke MO, Mitteneder J, Mayerhofer M, Lee K, et al. Defect Studies in Thin-Film SiO2 of a Metal-Oxide-Silicon Capacitor Using Drift-Assisted Positron Annihilation Lifetime Spectroscopy. Nanomaterials. 2025; 15(15):1142. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15151142

Chicago/Turabian Style

Helm, Ricardo, Werner Egger, Catherine Corbel, Peter Sperr, Maik Butterling, Andreas Wagner, Maciej Oskar Liedke, Johannes Mitteneder, Michael Mayerhofer, Kangho Lee, and et al. 2025. "Defect Studies in Thin-Film SiO2 of a Metal-Oxide-Silicon Capacitor Using Drift-Assisted Positron Annihilation Lifetime Spectroscopy" Nanomaterials 15, no. 15: 1142. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15151142

APA Style

Helm, R., Egger, W., Corbel, C., Sperr, P., Butterling, M., Wagner, A., Liedke, M. O., Mitteneder, J., Mayerhofer, M., Lee, K., Duesberg, G. S., Dollinger, G., & Dickmann, M. (2025). Defect Studies in Thin-Film SiO2 of a Metal-Oxide-Silicon Capacitor Using Drift-Assisted Positron Annihilation Lifetime Spectroscopy. Nanomaterials, 15(15), 1142. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15151142

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop