Next Article in Journal
Development and Evaluation of a Novel Self-Etch Dental Adhesive Incorporating Graphene Oxide–Zirconia (GO-ZrO2) and Hydroxyapatite–Zinc (HA-Zn) for Enhanced Bond Strength, Biocompatibility, and Long-Term Stability
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Study of Red and Grey Selenium Nanoparticles on Organ-Specific Selenium Deposition and Growth Performance in Japanese Quails
Previous Article in Special Issue
Atomic Layer Deposition of Nickel Oxides as Electrocatalyst for Oxygen Evolution Reaction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Hydrogen Storage Properties and Catalytic Mechanism of the AZ31-WS2 Nanotube/Pd Composite

by
Song-Jeng Huang
,
Veeramanikandan Rajagopal
*,
Sakthipriya Balu
,
Sivakumar Selvaraju
and
Murugan Subramani
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei City 10607, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2025, 15(11), 802; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15110802 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 28 March 2025 / Revised: 20 May 2025 / Accepted: 21 May 2025 / Published: 27 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanomaterials for Sustainable Green Energy)

Abstract

:
Magnesium-based alloys, known for their high hydrogen storage capacity, suffer from sluggish kinetics and high activation energy barriers. It can be further optimized through synergistic combinations with metal hydrides. This study aims to address these limitations by investigating the hydrogen sorption properties of AZ31 magnesium alloy combined with different compositions of WS2 nanotubes (NTs) and Pd. The materials AZ31, WS2 (tungsten disulfide) NTs, and Pd were pre-processed via the mechanical ball milling process. Field emission-scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were employed to investigate the composite morphology and confirm the nanotubular structure of WS2. This work is among the first to explore the synergistic catalytic effects of WS2 nanotubes and Pd on the hydrogenation/dehydrogenation behavior of AZ31 alloys. The composite with 8 wt.% WS2 NT/Pd demonstrated the fastest hydrogen sorption kinetics and a significant reduction in activation energy, from 123.25 kJ/mol to 104.58 kJ/mol. These results highlight the enhanced dehydrogenation performance of AZ31 through catalyst inclusion, offering a promising approach to improve hydrogen storage materials. These findings highlight the potential of combining inorganic NTs and transition metals as effective catalysts to enhance the hydrogen storage performance. This research paves the way for developing advanced hydrogen storage materials with improved performance, contributing to a sustainable energy future.

1. Introduction

Hydrogen energy is regarded as one of the best prospects for creating a carbon–free civilization due to its environmental friendliness, high energy density, non-toxicity, and repeatability. However, the advancement of a green hydrogen society is still constrained by the lack of a safe, high-density storage technology. In terms of security and density, solid-state hydrogen storage is preferable to liquid hydrogen storage at cryogenic temperatures (−253 °C, 0.5–1 MPa) and gaseous hydrogen storage at high pressure (35–70 MPa at ambient temperature) [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Magnesium hydride (MgH2) is one of several solid-state hydrogen storage materials that has received great attention due to its large volumetric (110 g/L) and gravimetric (7.6 wt.%) capacity, abundance of the magnesium element, and low price. The use of MgH2 is unfortunately constrained by the sluggish rates of hydrogen absorption and desorption as well as the high desorption temperature [7,8,9,10,11,12]. The hydrogen absorption and desorption properties of MgH2 under moderate circumstances have recently been tuned using methods such as surface modification, nano-structuring, combining with other additives, and catalyst doping to overcome the aforementioned issues. Among them, adding a catalyst is one of the most practical modifying techniques, which has greatly contributed to the improved de/hydrogenation kinetics of MgH2 [13,14,15,16].
In recent years, the catalytic effect of transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) and transition metal sulfides on MgH2 has been reported previously. MgH2 catalyzed by WS2 was reported in 2015 and demonstrated an outstanding catalytic action on MgH2. The results showed that the W and MgS produced in the interaction between MgH2 and WS2 during ball milling acted as a catalyst to enhance the kinetic characteristics of MgH2 [17]. Jia et al. in 2013 [18], revealed that MgH2 added with 16.7 wt.% of MoS2 desorbed 0.57 wt.% hydrogen, whereas the ball-milled MgH2 only desorbed 0.1 wt.% of hydrogen within 10 min at 300 °C. They state that the Mo and MgS produced by the interaction of MgH2 and MoS2 might weaken the bonds between Mg-H and provide an active site for hydrogen diffusion. Additionally, NiS was added to MgH2 to provide a more favorable catalytic action. Moreover, they concluded that the catalytic impact of the produced MgS was still unidentified, with the exception of the catalytic action of Ni [19]. Zhang et al. (2018) [20] found that when FeS2 was introduced to MgH2, the hydrogen release increased from 0.18 wt.% to 1.24 wt.% in 1400 s at 300 °C. They proposed that the MgH2-FeS2 composite’s apparent activation energy might be greatly reduced by in situ-formed Fe, which could offer active sites and hydrogen diffusion channels. From the above reports, the de/hydrogenation kinetics and activation performance of MgH2 might be greatly improved by transition metals and sulfides. The performance of hydrogen absorption and desorption could be enhanced by in situ-formed metals like W and Fe. Particularly transitional metals such as W have a remarkable ability to weaken Mg-H bonds.
In addition, the hydrogen sorption kinetics were significantly accelerated by mixing different transition metal catalysts with magnesium and its alloys. Particularly, it is desirable to utilize transition metals (Ni, Fe, Cu, Ti, and V) as catalysts to accelerate the sorption of hydrogen atoms onto the surface of materials made of magnesium alloys. The addition of Ni in AZ31-Mg alloy improved the sorption properties of the alloy materials considerably. The rate of hydrogenation and dehydrogenation is increased due to the hydrogen molecules, which diffuse into the Mg crystal lattice quickly. Notably, even at a modest temperature, the presence of a catalyst improves the hydrogen storage ability [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. When compared to other transition metals, the inclusion of Pd-related catalysts has shown a substantial catalytic effect on temperature-dependent hydrogen storage. The Pd nanoparticles included with multiwall carbon nanotubes involve three different sorption mechanisms in the temperature range of 110 K to 400 K [31].
In this work, we prepared AZ31-WS2 NT/Pd composite as hydrogen storage materials. WS2 NTs were synthesized through the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method. The WS2 NT/Pd composite was prepared by adding the palladium (Pd) particles to the WS2 NT, which was further ball-milled with AZ31 magnesium alloy in order to improve the hydrogenation properties. The role of the synthesized WS2 NT/Pd composite on the activation process and the isothermal sorption properties was investigated, which could lead to the catalytic mechanism of transition metals with inorganic nanotubes in the future for magnesium-based hydrogen storage alloy materials. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the synergistic effects of WS2 NTs and Pd catalysts on the hydrogen storage properties of AZ31 magnesium alloy.

2. Experimental

2.1. Synthesis of WS2 Nanotubes

The tungsten disulfide (WS2) nanotubes (NTs) were synthesized in a solid–gas reaction process. The WO3 powder with a dimension of ~100 nm was used to produce the WS2 NTs. The WO3 powder was evenly spread on a quartz boat and kept in the reaction chamber. During the reaction, the temperature was maintained at 900 °C under a 1% H2/99% N2 gas environment for one hour with a flow rate of 400 mL min−1. Equation (1) illustrates the reduction of WO3 by H2 gas into the intermediate phase of WO3−x. After completing the reduction procedure, the reaction chamber was filled with 1% H2/99%N2 and H2S for 1 h to sulfurize the reduced WO3−x. The WS2 was formed as a result of the sulfurization process [32,33,34,35]. After cooling to ambient room temperature, WS2 NTs were collected from the reaction chamber. The WS2 formation from the WO3−x phase was explained in Equation (2).
WO3 (s) + H2 (g) → WO3−x + xH2O + (1 − x) H2
WO(3−x) + (1 − x) H2 + H2S → WS2 + (3 − x) H2O.

2.2. Synthesis of AZ31-WS2 NT/Pd Composite

The commercial magnesium-based AZ31 alloy (3.08 Al, 0.908 Zn, Mn 0.393 Bal Mg) was purchased from Kuangyue Co., Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan. The manually rasped alloy powders from the pure AZ31 magnesium alloy ingots were prepared by following the previous procedures [21,36]. Palladium (Pd) particles were purchased from Top Nano Technology Co., Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan with 99.9% purity.
The AZ31-WS2NT/Pd (AZ31-WP) composite particles with various weight ratios were mechanically milled by high-energy mechanical ball milling with the ball-to-powder ratio of 40:1, and the rotation speed was maintained at 400 rpm for 8 h of milling time. Three different types of compositions were prepared and denoted as AZ31-0 WP (0 wt.%), AZ31-4 WP (4 wt.%), and AZ31-8 WP (8 wt.%). The planetary-type ball-milling machine (Retsch PM 100, Haan, Germany) was used for the preparation of all the samples by the milling process. All the powder sample handling was carried out in an inert atmosphere.

2.3. Characterizations

The phase compositions and transformations of the prepared powder samples were examined by X-Ray diffraction (XRD, D2 phaser, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) with a Cu-Kα ray source fixed at a voltage of 45 kV and a current rating of 0.8 mA. The phase compositions were analysed by Diffract.EVA software V4.3. Microstructure and powder morphologies of AZ31-WS2 NT/Pd composite were observed by field emission electron microscopy (FE-SEM), model JSM 6390LV, equipped with an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS). Morphologies of WS2 NTs were investigated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), model Philips Technai F20 G2 FEI-TEM.
Hydrogenation and dehydrogenation properties were measured using a Sievert-type apparatus, with operations managed by the LabView 2021 21.0 software program. A total of 0.2 g of ball-milled samples was located in the stainless-steel reactor. The activation process was conducted before the isothermal hydrogen testing. The isothermal hydrogenation testing was performed at a temperature of 375 °C. During the hydrogenation reaction, the initial hydrogenation pressures of 3 MPa for absorption and 0.0010 MPa for desorption were maintained. In order to obtain high-accuracy data, a high-precision pressure sensor and thermocouples were used to measure the pressure variation and the reaction temperature. Differential scanning calorimeter (DSC-MERRLER TOLEDO high temperature thermal analysis system) was used to conduct the sample decomposition analysis at different heating rates from 50 to 500 °C. The process of materials synthesis and de/hydrogenation process are displayed in Scheme 1.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structural Analysis of WS2 NTs

The XRD pattern of synthesized WS2 NTs is shown in Figure 1. The characteristic peaks at 14.6°, 33.9°, and 39.2° correspond to the planes of (002), (101), and (103) of WS2 NTs, respectively, demonstrating that the WS2 NTs were synthesized effectively using the chemical vapor deposition gas–solid reaction method. The sharp peaks indicate that the synthesized WS2 NTs are well-crystallized in the reaction. The WO2.9 was also identified after the reaction due to the non-reacted residue of tungsten oxide precursor material.
Furthermore, the surface morphology of the as-prepared WS2 NTs was observed by FE-SEM, and the images are presented in Figure 2. It can be seen that a large number of NTs formed as clusters with an average dimension of 1.5 to 2 μm in diameter. However, the individual WS2 NTs reveal an average diameter of 50 to 90 nm (Figure 2a). Moreover, the TEM images of WS2 NTs with high magnification are presented in Figure 2b, showing the successful synthesis of multiwall inorganic NTs. It can be clearly understood that Figure 2c shows the clear boundaries of the inner and outer walls, indicating the successful formation of NTs. The NT structure might provide several active sites and provide enough interaction with magnesium alloy powders during the ball milling process. The small grain size and the nanotube structures facilitated the hydrogenation and dehydrogenation properties of AZ31 Mg alloy powders. Further, the SEM-EDS and mapping analysis were performed for the NT clusters as presented in Figure 2d,e, resulting in the EDS detecting the presence of tungsten (W), sulfur (S), and oxygen (O). The oxygen might be from the minute, unreacted, pristine tungsten oxide (WO3) during the nanotube synthesis process.

3.2. Morphology Analysis of AZ31-WS2 NT/Pd Composite Powders

The different quantities of WS2 NT/Pd were added to all of the prepared AZ31-WS2 NT/Pd composites throughout the 8 h ball milling process. The surface morphology of ball-milled AZ31-8WP before and after hydrogenation was observed by FE-SEM and presented in Figure 3. The powder samples contain an irregular morphology due to the highly uneven force generated during the ball milling process. The particle size was measured for rasped pristine AZ31 samples and is in the range of 80 to 100 μm. When the content of WS2 NT/Pd increased from 0 to 8 wt.%, the average particle size of the AZ31-WS2 NT composites decreased to 19.7, 16.4, and 15.3 μm, for 0, 4, and 8 wt.%, respectively. This indicates that the particle size of the AZ31 alloy with different quantities of WS2 NTs is not noticeably different. Additionally, the elemental dispersion mapping shown in Figure 4, the elements Al, W, S, and Pd in the ball-milled sample are evenly distributed on the magnesium alloy powders with the scale of 10 μm. The uniform distribution serves as one of the significant factors for improving the diffusion of hydrogen along the Mg-alloy interfaces. The ball milling of AZ31 magnesium composite results in a reduction in grain size and creates several distinct defects, which allow the hydrogen atoms to diffuse more quickly [37].

3.3. Hydrogen Storage Properties of AZ31-WS2 NT/Pd Composites

The activation curves at 375 °C for three different types of AZ31-WS2 NT/Pd composite were measured to investigate their hydrogen storage properties. From Figure 5a, the three different types of composites have a linear relationship curve for absorption in the first cycle. The pristine AZ31 magnesium alloy exhibits the slowest rate of hydrogen absorption, while catalyst-added sample powders such as AZ31-4 WP and AZ31-8 WP show a faster absorption. The AZ31-8 WP composite reached its maximum capacity of 3.91 wt.% in 60 min; likely, the AZ31-0 WP and AZ31-4 WP absorbed 2.32 wt.% and 3.06 wt.%, respectively. Obliviously, the addition of WS2 NT/Pd catalyst to the AZ31 magnesium increased the rate of nucleation of the hydrogen into the composite powders. Similarly, the rate of hydrogen desorption differs for the three samples, which specifies that the WS2-NT/Pd catalyst has an effect on the dehydrogenation kinetics of the AZ31 magnesium alloy. The AZ31 magnesium alloy with a high quantity (8 wt.%) of WS2-NT/Pd composite has released the hydrogen faster than other materials in the first activation cycle, which released 3.90 wt.% in 60 min. In the second cycle, the rate of hydrogenation was noticeably different for the three composites: the hydrogen absorption capacity of AZ31-4 WP reached a higher capacity, and the rate of absorption of AZ31-8 WP was faster than that of the other two samples (Figure 5c). During the desorption process, the dehydrogenation rate of the three samples varies from each other, and the entire amount of hydrogen is released in less than 500 s. Notably, the hydrogen absorption and desorption capacities of the second cycle reached a larger quantity than the first cycle. In the third activation cycle, the same scenario as in cycle two is followed: the hydrogen storage capacity of AZ31-4 WP is 0.25 wt.% larger, but the more stable absorption curve observed in AZ31-8 WP reached the maximum capacity of 5.28 wt.% (Figure 5e). However, a decline in hydrogen storage capacity was noted from the third absorption–desorption cycle onward. This reduction is attributed to the high concentration of catalyst inclusion. While the catalyst accelerates the hydrogenation reaction kinetics, it does not directly contribute to hydrogen storage. The excessive catalyst content effectively reduces the available volume of reactive magnesium, thereby limiting the overall hydrogen storage capacity. During the desorption process, no incubation time has been observed for the three materials for the three cycles of activation observed in Figure 5b,d,f. In the activation stage, the hydrogenation curve of the AZ31-8 WP additive sample responds to hydrogen very fast among the three different samples, which implies that increasing the amount of WS2 NT/Pd in the alloy samples speeds up the rate of nucleation that is feasible for activation.
The isothermal hydrogenation and dehydrogenation properties of AZ31 with different WS2 NT/Pd content were studied at 375 °C, and the results are shown in Figure 6. The addition of WS2NT/Pd accelerates the rate of absorption and desorption. At the temperature of 375 °C, AZ31-0 WP, which has no additives, absorbed 6.31 wt.% hydrogen as the highest, while 6.07 wt.% hydrogen was absorbed for AZ31-4 WP and 5.60 wt.% hydrogen for AZ31-8 WP at the same parameter conditions (Figure 6a). AZ31-0 WP desorbed 6.24 wt.% in 10 min at the fixed temperature level, while AZ31-4 WP desorbed 6.07 wt.% and 5.58 wt.% hydrogen for AZ31-8 WP. The observations illustrated that increasing the quantity of WS2NT/Pd content significantly enhanced the hydrogenation and dehydrogenation kinetics of the composites. In addition to that, increasing the quantity of catalyst influences the hydrogen storage capacity significantly. Although the catalyst significantly enhances the hydrogenation reaction kinetics, it does not directly contribute to hydrogen storage. Instead, the excessive catalyst content reduces the volume fraction of reactive magnesium available for hydrogen uptake, thereby limiting the overall storage capacity. The same parameters have been maintained during ball milling of the composite. Therefore, the performance of the different composites was mainly attributed to the varying WS2-NT/Pd content. It is a fact that AZ31-4 WP contained fast kinetics with minimal loss of hydrogen storage capacity.

3.4. XRD-Phase Analysis of AZ31-WS2 NT/Pd Composite

The above-mentioned kinetic results show that the addition of WS2 NT/Pd composite to the AZ31 magnesium alloy significantly enhanced the rate of hydrogen absorption and desorption. The phase transformations of two different states, such as ball milled and after hydrogenation, were investigated by XRD, and the results are presented in Figure 7. After the ball milling process, the identified Mg phase has sharp peaks for AZ31 magnesium alloy. While adding WS2-NT/Pd composite, the Mg peak intensity decreased with the increment of catalyst content. Moreover, the W10O29 and S (sulfur) phases identified individually show that during the ball milling process, the added materials react with the residual oxygen. The WO2 phase was identified after hydrogenation cycles. The presence of numerous oxygen vacancies on WO2.9 increases the electronic conductivity properties and also offers more sites for activation [38]. Because it was believed that the presence of WO2.9 could significantly facilitate the H2 molecules’ dissociation on the surface to enhance the absorption and the presence of transition metal oxide such as WO2 plays the role of catalyst during desorption that weaken the bond strength between hydrogen and magnesium enhance the rates of the hydrogen desorption in the storage materials system [39]. Due to the conceivable low quantity, the Pd was not identified in the XRD patterns of the AZ31-WS2 NT/Pd composite before and after hydrogenation. Additionally, the residual magnesium presented in the three different compositions demonstrates that the composites have not reached their actual capacity of hydrogenation in 60 min. The comparative research on chalcogenides indicates that the presence of sulfur compounds in magnesium hydrogenation may not have a favorable effect on the hydrogenation capacity’s performance [40]. After the hydrogenation MgH2 phase has been formed with a sharp crystalline structure.
The reaction equation presented in Equation (3):
2Mg(s) + H2(g) → 2MgH2(s)

3.5. Activation Energy Calculation

Furthermore, the thermal decomposition measurements of three different samples were analyzed. After the hydrogenation process, the powdered samples were subjected to DSC (differential scanning calorimetry) analysis, which was heated up to a maximum temperature of 500 °C. Four different rates of heating (10, 15, 20, and 25 °C/min) were used to investigate the materials, and endothermic peaks are presented in Figure 8. The apparent activation energies (Ea) of hydrogen desorption for AZ31-WS2 NT/Pd composites were calculated by using the Kissinger formula as presented in Equation (4) [41].
ln (β/T2p) = − (Ea./(RTp)) + C
where β is the heating rate observed from DSC measurements, Tp is the peak temperature, C is a temperature-independent constant, and R is an atmospheric standard gas constant. From the Kissinger plot presented in Figure 9, the apparent activation energy values Ea for AZ31-WS2 NT/Pd composites were evaluated to be 123.25 kJ/mol, 109.06 kJ/mol, and 104.58 kJ/mol for AZ31-0 WP, AZ31-4 WP, and AZ31-8 WP, respectively, which are comparatively much lower than the MgH2 storage system 161.9 (kJ/mol) [42]. Table 1 displays some of the magnesium-based alloys and composites. We can see that the activation energy of this work, AZ31-8 WP, is lower than those of some recent results. The decrease in activation energy demonstrated that the inclusion of WS2-NT/Pd might lower the energy barrier for hydrogen breakdown in MgH2, leading to better hydrogen decomposition kinetics of MgH2 in the AZ31-WS2 NT/Pd composites.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the inorganic WS2 NTs were successfully synthesized by using the chemical vapor deposition method. Three distinct compositions of AZ31-WS2 NT/Pd have been prepared through ball milling, and the analysis of their microstructures, activation characteristics, hydrogen storage capabilities, and catalytic activities has been investigated. In the course of the activation process, the composite with an increased catalyst concentration (AZ31-8 WP) exhibits more stable and rapid hydrogen absorption and desorption rates. The composite AZ31-4WP demonstrates higher kinetic performance with a maximum storage capacity of 6.07 wt.% during the isothermal de/hydrogenation. The capacity was drastically lowered to 5.60 wt.% by increasing the WS2 NT/Pd catalytic content to 8 wt.%. The desorption activation energy was lowered from 123.25 kJ/mol to 104.58 kJ/mol. These improvements in hydrogenation performance are caused by the addition of WS2 NT/Pd catalyst to the AZ31-Mg alloy. This could be beneficial in the future development and creation of high-performance hydrogenation materials with the addition of inorganic NTs and transition metal composites on magnesium-based alloys.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano15110802/s1, Figure S1: SEM morphologies of AZ31 WS2 NTs/Pd composite powders (a) After hydrogenation, and (b) after hydrogenation Magnified; Figure S2: EDS Mapping of (a) AZ31 WS2 NTs/Pd composite, (b) Mg, (c) Al, (d) W, (e) S, (f) Pd and (g) EDS spectrum.

Author Contributions

Methodology, V.R.; Validation, V.R.; Investigation, V.R.; Resources, S.-J.H.; Data curation, V.R.; Writing—original draft, V.R.; Writing—review & editing, V.R., S.B., S.S. and M.S.; Supervision, S.-J.H.; Project administration, S.-J.H.; Funding acquisition, S.-J.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, grant number MOST 105-2221-E-011-058-MY2.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support received from the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan for this research under the grant number MOST 105-2221-E-011-058-MY2.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shao, H.; He, L.; Lin, H.; Li, H. Progress and Trends in Magnesium-Based Materials for Energy-Storage Research: A Review. Energy Technol. 2018, 6, 445–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kim, K.C. A review on design strategies for metal hydrides with enhanced reaction thermodynamics for hydrogen storage applications. Int. J. Energy Res. 2018, 42, 1455–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, J.; Yan, S.; Qu, H. Stress/strain effects on thermodynamic properties of magnesium hydride: A brief review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 16603–16610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, X.; Liu, Y.; Hu, J.; Gao, M.; Pan, H. Empowering hydrogen storage performance of MgH2 by nanoengineering and nano catalysis. Mater. Today Nano 2020, 9, 100064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, J.; Yan, S.; Qu, H. Recent progress in magnesium hydride modified through catalysis and nanoconfinement. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 1545–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jain, I.P. Hydrogen the fuel for 21st century. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34, 7368–7378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. El-Eskandarany, M.S. Recent developments in the fabrication, characterization and implementation of MgH2-based solid-hydrogen materials in the Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 9907–9930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sadhasivam, T.; Kim, H.-T.; Jung, S.; Roh, S.-H.; Park, J.-H.; Jung, H.-Y. Dimensional effects of nanostructured Mg/MgH2 for hydrogen storage applications: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 72, 523–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tian, M.; Shang, C. Nano-structured MgH2 catalyzed by TiC nanoparticles for hydrogen storage. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2011, 86, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bhatnagar, A.; Johnson, J.K.; Shaz, M.A.; Srivastava, O.N. TiH2 as a Dynamic Additive for Improving the De/Rehydrogenation Properties of MgH2: A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Mechanistic Investigation. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 21248–21261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jain, I.; Lal, C.; Jain, A. Hydrogen storage in Mg: A most promising material. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35, 5133–5144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, M.; Xiao, X.; Wang, X.; Chen, M.; Lu, Y.; Liu, M.; Chen, L. Excellent catalysis of TiO2 nanosheets with high-surface-energy {001} facets on the hydrogen storage properties of MgH2. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 7465–7473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhou, C.; Bowman, R.C.; Fang, Z.Z.; Lu, J.; Xu, L.; Sun, P.; Liu, H.; Wu, H.; Liu, Y. Amorphous TiCu-Based Additives for Improving Hydrogen Storage Properties of Magnesium Hydride. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 38868–38879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chen, G.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, J.; Guo, X.; Zhu, Y.; Li, L. Enhancing hydrogen storage performances of MgH2 by Ni nano-particles over mesoporous carbon CMK-3. Nanotechnology 2018, 29, 265705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yuan, Z.; Sui, Y.; Zhai, T.; Yin, Y.; Luo, L.; Feng, D. Influence of CeO2 nanoparticles on microstructure and hydrogen storage performance of Mg-Ni-Zn alloy. Mater. Charact. 2021, 178, 111248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shtender, V.; Denys, R.; Paul-Boncour, V.; Riabov, A.; Zavaliy, I. Hydrogenation properties and crystal structure of YMgT4 (T = Co, Ni, Cu) compounds. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 603, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, J.; Zhang, W.; Cheng, Y.; Ke, D.; Han, S. Hydrogenation/dehydrogenation performances of the MgH2-WS2 composites. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. Mater. Sci. Ed. 2015, 30, 670–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jia, Y.; Han, S.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, X.; Sun, P.; Liu, Y.; Shi, H.; Wang, J. Hydrogen absorption and desorption kinetics of MgH2 catalyzed by MoS2 and MoO2. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38, 2352–2356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xie, X.; Ma, X.; Liu, P.; Shang, J.; Li, X.; Liu, T. Formation of Multiple-Phase Catalysts for the Hydrogen Storage of Mg Nanoparticles by Adding Flowerlike NiS. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 5937–5946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, W.; Xu, G.; Cheng, Y.; Chen, L.; Huo, Q.; Liu, S. Improved hydrogen storage properties of MgH2 by the addition of FeS2 micro-spheres. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 5217–5225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Huang, S.-J.; Rajagopal, V.; Ali, A.N. Influence of the ECAP and HEBM processes and the addition of Ni catalyst on the hydrogen storage properties of AZ31-x Ni (x = 0, 2, 4) alloy. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 1047–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ji, L.; Zhang, L.; Yang, X.; Zhu, X.; Chen, L. The remarkably improved hydrogen storage performance of MgH2 by the synergetic effect of an FeNi/rGO nanocomposite. Dalton Trans. 2020, 49, 4146–4154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ding, X.; Ding, H.; Song, Y.; Xiang, C.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Q. Activity-Tuning of Supported Co–Ni Nanocatalysts via Composition and Morphology for Hydrogen Storage in MgH2. Front. Chem. 2020, 7, 937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wang, K.; Deng, Q. Constructing Core-Shell Co@N-Rich Carbon Additives Toward Enhanced Hydrogen Storage Performance of Magnesium Hydride. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Shahi, R.R.; Tiwari, A.P.; Shaz, M.; Srivastava, O. Studies on de/rehydrogenation characteristics of nanocrystalline MgH2 co-catalyzed with Ti, Fe and Ni. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38, 2778–2784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tarasov, B.P.; Mozhzhukhin, S.A.; Arbuzov, A.A.; Volodin, A.A.; Fokina, E.E.; Fursikov, P.V.; Lototskyy, M.V.; Yartys, V.A. Features of the Hydrogenation of Magnesium with a Ni-Graphene Coating. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A 2020, 94, 996–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Verma, S.K.; Bhatnagar, A.; Shukla, V.; Soni, P.K.; Pandey, A.P.; Yadav, T.P.; Srivastava, O.N. Multiple improvements of hydrogen sorption and their mechanism for MgH2 catalyzed through TiH2@Gr. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 19516–19530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pukazhselvan, D.; Sandhya, K.S.; Ramasamy, D.; Shaula, A.; Fagg, D.P. Transformation of Metallic Ti to TiH2 Phase in the Ti/MgH2 Composite and Its Influence on the Hydrogen Storage Behavior of MgH2. Chem. Phys. Chem. 2020, 21, 1195–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ma, Z.; Zou, J.; Khan, D.; Zhu, W.; Hu, C.; Zeng, X.; Ding, W. Preparation and hydrogen storage properties of MgH2-trimesic acid-TM MOF (TM=Co, Fe) composites. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2019, 35, 2132–2143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Park, K.B.; Ko, W.-S.; Fadonougbo, J.O.; Na, T.-W.; Im, H.-T.; Park, J.-Y.; Kang, J.-W.; Kang, H.-S.; Park, C.-S.; Park, H.-K. Effect of Fe substitution by Mn and Cr on first hydrogenation kinetics of air-exposed TiFe-based hydrogen storage alloy. Mater. Charact. 2021, 178, 111246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Taherkhani, A.; Mortazavi, S.; Reyhani, A.; Tayal, A.; Caliebe, W.; Moradi, M.; Noei, H. Temperature-dependent hydrogen storage mechanism in palladium nanoparticles decorated on multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 9734–9747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rothschild, A.; Sloan, J.; Tenne, R. Growth of WS2 nanotubes phases. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 5169–5179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Huang, S.-J.; Immanuel, P.N.; Yen, Y.-K.; Yen, C.-L.; Tseng, C.-E.; Lin, G.-T.; Lin, C.-K.; Huang, Z.-X. Tungsten disulfide nanotube-modified conductive paper-based Chemi resistive sensor for the application in volatile organic compounds’ detection. Sensors 2021, 21, 6121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Immanuel, P.N.; Huang, S.-J.; Danchuk, V.; Sedova, A.; Prilusky, J.; Goldreich, A.; Shalom, H.; Musin, A.; Yadgarov, L. Improving the Stability of Halide Perovskite Solar Cells Using Nanoparticles of Tungsten Disulfide. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 4454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Immanuel, P.N.; Huang, S.J.; Taank, P.; Goldreich, A.; Prilusky, J.; Byregowda, A.; Carmieli, R.; Shalom, H.; Leybovich, A.; Zak, A.; et al. Enhanced photocatalytic activity of Cs4PbBr6/WS2 hybrid nanocomposite. Adv. Energy Sustain. Res. 2024, 5, 2300193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Huang, S.-J.; Rajagopal, V.; Chen, Y.L.; Chiu, Y.H. Improving the hydrogenation properties of AZ31-Mg alloys with different carbonaceous additives by high energy ball milling (HEBM) and equal channel angular pressing (ECAP). Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 22291–22301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bendyna, J.K.; Dyjak, S.; Notten, P.H. The influence of ball-milling time on the dehydrogenation properties of the NaAlH4-MgH2 composite. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 4200–4206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bayeh, A.W.; Kabtamu, D.M.; Chang, Y.-C.; Chen, G.-C.; Chen, H.-Y.; Liu, T.-R.; Wondimu, T.H.; Wang, K.-C.; Wang, C.-H. Hydrogen-Treated Defect-Rich W18O49 Nanowire-Modified Graphite Felt as High-Performance Electrode for Vanadium Redox Flow Battery. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019, 2, 2541–2551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yadav, D.K.; Chawla, K.; Pooja; Lal, N.; Choudhary, B.; Lal, C. Catalytic effect of TiO2on hydrogen storage properties of MgH2. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 46, 2326–2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, L.; Hu, Y.; Lin, J.; Leng, H.; Sun, C.; Wu, C.; Li, Q.; Pan, F. The hydrogen storage performance and catalytic mechanism of the MgH2-MoS2 composite. J. Magnes. Alloys 2022, 11, 2530–2540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gao, S.; Wang, H.; Wang, X.; Liu, H.; He, T.; Wang, Y.; Wu, C.; Li, S.; Yan, M. MoSe2 hollow nanospheres decorated with FeNi3 nanoparticles for enhancing the hydrogen storage properties of MgH2. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 830, 154631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, Q.; Zang, L.; Huang, Y.; Gao, P.; Jiao, L.; Yuan, H.; Wang, Y. Improved hydrogen storage properties of MgH2 with Ni-based compounds. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 24247–24255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhang, L.; Zhao, C.; Wu, F.; Wang, Y. Carbon-wrapped Ti-Co bimetallic oxide nanocages: Novel and efficient catalysts for hydrogen storage in magnesium hydride. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 952, 170002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Shang, H.; Qi, Y.; Li, P.; Zhao, D. Investigation on structure and hydrogen storage performance of as-milled and cast Mg90Al10 alloys. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 6642–6653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, P.; Tian, Z.; Wang, Z.; Xia, C.; Yang, T.; Ou, X. Improved hydrogen storage properties of MgH2 using transition metal sulfides as catalyst. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 27107–27118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yang, T.; Yuan, Z.; Bu, W.; Jia, Z.; Qi, Y.; Zhang, Y. Evolution of the phase structure and hydrogen storage thermodynamics and kinetics of Mg88Y12 binary alloy. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 2689–2699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Xie, L.; Li, J.; Zhang, T.; Song, L. Dehydrogenation steps and factors controlling desorption kinetics of a Mg Ce hydrogen storage alloy. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 21121–21130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, S.; Yong, H.; Yao, J.; Ma, J.; Liu, B.; Hu, J.; Zhang, Y. Influence of the phase evolution and hydrogen storage behaviors of Mg-RE alloy by a multi-valence Mo-based catalyst. J. Energy Storage 2023, 58, 106397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yuan, Z.; Li, C.; Li, T.; Zhai, T.; Sui, Y.; Li, X.; Feng, D.; Zhang, Y. Improved hydrogen storage performance of Sm-Mg composites by adding nano-graphite. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 935, 168144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Huang, S.-J.; Rajagopal, V.; Skripnyuk, V.; Rabkin, E.; Fang, C. A comparative study of hydrogen storage properties of AZ31 and AZ91 magnesium alloys processed by different methods. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 935, 167854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. AZ31-WS2 NT/Pd composite materials synthesis and de/hydrogenation process.
Scheme 1. AZ31-WS2 NT/Pd composite materials synthesis and de/hydrogenation process.
Nanomaterials 15 00802 sch001
Figure 1. XRD pattern of as-synthesized WS2 NTs.
Figure 1. XRD pattern of as-synthesized WS2 NTs.
Nanomaterials 15 00802 g001
Figure 2. Morphology of WS2 NTs: (a) SEM image of clustered WS2 NTs, (b,c) TEM images with low and high magnification, and (d,e) electron image and respective EDS spectrum.
Figure 2. Morphology of WS2 NTs: (a) SEM image of clustered WS2 NTs, (b,c) TEM images with low and high magnification, and (d,e) electron image and respective EDS spectrum.
Nanomaterials 15 00802 g002
Figure 3. SEM morphologies of AZ31 WS2 NT/Pd composite powders: (a) as-ball milled and (b) after hydrogenation.
Figure 3. SEM morphologies of AZ31 WS2 NT/Pd composite powders: (a) as-ball milled and (b) after hydrogenation.
Nanomaterials 15 00802 g003
Figure 4. EDS Mapping of (a) AZ31 WS2 NT/Pd composite, (b) Mg, (c) Al, (d) W, (e) S, and (f) Pd.
Figure 4. EDS Mapping of (a) AZ31 WS2 NT/Pd composite, (b) Mg, (c) Al, (d) W, (e) S, and (f) Pd.
Nanomaterials 15 00802 g004
Figure 5. The hydrogen absorption and desorption activation curves of AZ31-WS2 NT/Pd composites: (a,b) first cycle, (c,d) second cycle, and (e,f) third cycle.
Figure 5. The hydrogen absorption and desorption activation curves of AZ31-WS2 NT/Pd composites: (a,b) first cycle, (c,d) second cycle, and (e,f) third cycle.
Nanomaterials 15 00802 g005
Figure 6. Isothermal hydrogen absorption and desorption kinetics curves of (a,b) AZ31-WS2 NT/Pd composites.
Figure 6. Isothermal hydrogen absorption and desorption kinetics curves of (a,b) AZ31-WS2 NT/Pd composites.
Nanomaterials 15 00802 g006
Figure 7. XRD patterns of AZ31-WS2 NT/Pd composite: (a) as ball milled and (b) after hydrogenation process.
Figure 7. XRD patterns of AZ31-WS2 NT/Pd composite: (a) as ball milled and (b) after hydrogenation process.
Nanomaterials 15 00802 g007
Figure 8. DSC curves of (a) AZ31-0 WP, (b) AZ31-4 WP, and (c) AZ31-8 WP at various heating rates.
Figure 8. DSC curves of (a) AZ31-0 WP, (b) AZ31-4 WP, and (c) AZ31-8 WP at various heating rates.
Nanomaterials 15 00802 g008
Figure 9. Kissinger plots of (a) AZ31-0WP, (b) AZ31-4WP, and (c) AZ31-8WP obtained from DSC measurement.
Figure 9. Kissinger plots of (a) AZ31-0WP, (b) AZ31-4WP, and (c) AZ31-8WP obtained from DSC measurement.
Nanomaterials 15 00802 g009
Table 1. The activation energy of (Ea) recent Mg-based alloy materials and composites.
Table 1. The activation energy of (Ea) recent Mg-based alloy materials and composites.
SampleEa (kJ/mol)References
MgH2 + 5 wt.% Ti-CoO @ C-3137.76[43]
Mg90 Al10157.7 ± 0.8[44]
MgH2 + CuS2123.7 ± 8[45]
Mg88Y12122.0[46]
Mg-20 Ce110.0 ± 3[47]
Mg90Ce5Y5 + Mn114.24[48]
Sm5Mg41 + 4 wt % NG112.88[49]
AZ31-ECAP128 ± 5[50]
AZ31-4 WP109.06Current work
AZ31-8 WP104.58Current work
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, S.-J.; Rajagopal, V.; Balu, S.; Selvaraju, S.; Subramani, M. The Hydrogen Storage Properties and Catalytic Mechanism of the AZ31-WS2 Nanotube/Pd Composite. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 802. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15110802

AMA Style

Huang S-J, Rajagopal V, Balu S, Selvaraju S, Subramani M. The Hydrogen Storage Properties and Catalytic Mechanism of the AZ31-WS2 Nanotube/Pd Composite. Nanomaterials. 2025; 15(11):802. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15110802

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Song-Jeng, Veeramanikandan Rajagopal, Sakthipriya Balu, Sivakumar Selvaraju, and Murugan Subramani. 2025. "The Hydrogen Storage Properties and Catalytic Mechanism of the AZ31-WS2 Nanotube/Pd Composite" Nanomaterials 15, no. 11: 802. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15110802

APA Style

Huang, S.-J., Rajagopal, V., Balu, S., Selvaraju, S., & Subramani, M. (2025). The Hydrogen Storage Properties and Catalytic Mechanism of the AZ31-WS2 Nanotube/Pd Composite. Nanomaterials, 15(11), 802. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15110802

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop