Next Article in Journal
Carbon and Cellulose-Based Nanoparticle-Reinforced Polymer Nanocomposites: A Critical Review
Previous Article in Journal
Sub-Millisecond Laser-Irradiation-Mediated Surface Restructure Boosts the CO Production Yield of Cobalt Oxide Supported Pd Nanoparticles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of α-Al2O3 Additive on the Surface Micro-Arc Oxidation Coating of Ti6Al4V Alloy

College of Mechatronic Engineering, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(11), 1802; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13111802
Submission received: 16 May 2023 / Revised: 2 June 2023 / Accepted: 3 June 2023 / Published: 5 June 2023

Abstract

:
α-Al2O3 nanoparticles can enter a micro-arc oxidation coating and participate in the coating-formation process through chemical reaction or physical–mechanical combination in the electrolyte. The prepared coating has high strength, good toughness and excellent wear and corrosion resistance. In this paper, 0, 1, 3 and 5 g/L of α-Al2O3 nanoparticles were added to a Na2SiO3-Na(PO4)6 electrolyte to study the effect on the microstructure and properties of a Ti6Al4V alloy micro-arc oxidation coating. The thickness, microscopic morphology, phase composition, roughness, microhardness, friction and wear properties and corrosion resistance were characterized using a thickness meter, scanning electron microscope, X-ray diffractometer, laser confocal microscope, microhardness tester and electrochemical workstation. The results show that surface quality, thickness, microhardness, friction and wear properties and corrosion resistance of the Ti6Al4V alloy micro-arc oxidation coating were improved by adding α-Al2O3 nanoparticles to the electrolyte. The nanoparticles enter the coatings by physical embedding and chemical reaction. The coatings’ phase composition mainly includes Rutile-TiO2, Anatase-TiO2, α-Al2O3, Al2TiO5 and amorphous phase SiO2. Due to the filling effect of α-Al2O3, the thickness and hardness of the micro-arc oxidation coating increase, and the surface micropore aperture size decreases. The roughness decreases with the increase of α-Al2O3 additive concentration, while the friction wear performance and corrosion resistance are improved.

1. Introduction

Titanium alloys have a wide range of applications in aerospace, shipbuilding and biomedical fields because of their light mass, high specific strength and good thermal stability [1,2,3]. However, titanium alloy has low hardness. When applied as an aerospace material, it is prone to scratching and has a large bite tendency, and is easily damaged by the scraping of abrasive particles during sliding friction, and abrasive wear occurs [4]. In addition, the surface integrity of a Ti6Al4V alloy is sensitive, and surface damage is very likely to induce the sprouting and expansion of fatigue cracks, which greatly limits the alloys’ application under severe friction and other working conditions [5,6]. In addition, the standard potential of a titanium electrode is only −1.63 V (relative to a standard hydrogen electrode—NHE), so it is susceptible to various forms of corrosion such as galvanic corrosion, crevice corrosion, intergranular corrosion and stress corrosion cracking under the action of chemical or electrochemical reactions [7,8]. Surface-strengthening processes can greatly improve the surface hardness of titanium alloys without changing the internal structure and mechanical properties of the material. Commonly used surface-strengthening processes for titanium alloys include thermal oxidation, laser melting, ion implantation, anodic oxidation and micro-arc oxidation (MAO) [9,10,11,12]. Among them, micro-arc oxidation technology has attracted a lot of attention from scholars all over the world because of its easy operation, green credentials and excellent coating performance [13,14,15,16]. By choosing the electrolyte solution and adjusting the electrical parameters of the micro-arc oxidation process, a highly dense and well-bonded ceramic-phase oxidation coating can be grown on the surface of Ti, Al, Mg and their alloy substrates, which can significantly improve the surface hardness and wear and corrosion resistance [17,18,19,20,21].
As the micro-arc oxidation process grows a large number of fine holes on the surface of the substrate material, it will inevitably reduce the protection performance of the micro-arc oxidation coating, which will affect the service performance of the material in some special environments [22,23,24,25]. Recent studies on the addition of nano-additives to a micro-arc oxidation electrolyte solution have shown that α-Al2O3 nanoparticles are easily dispersed in the electrolyte, especially in alkaline solutions, and can participate in the coating-formation process by chemical reaction or physical–mechanical combination [26,27,28,29]. The prepared coating has high strength, good toughness and excellent wear and corrosion resistance. Niazi [1] prepared a TiO2-Al2O3 nanocomposite coating on the surface of pure titanium by an electrophoresis-enhanced micro-arc oxidation technique, which resulted in a fourfold increase in surface hardness and a significant increase in corrosion resistance. Shokouhfar [30] investigated the effect of α-Al2O3 nanoparticles on the micro-arc oxidation coating of pure titanium. The results showed that the friction coefficient decreases to 0.5, and the corrosion current density decreases from 1.7 × 10−6 A/cm2 to 1 × 10−6 A/cm2.
In this paper, the electrolyte solution was modified by adding α-Al2O3 nanoparticles with different mass concentrations (0, 1, 3 and 5 g/L) to the electrolyte, and the effects of the concentration variation on the thickness, microscopic morphology, phase composition, roughness, microhardness, friction and wear properties and corrosion resistance of the Ti6Al4V alloy micro-arc oxidation coatings were investigated to explore the mechanism of friction reduction and anti-corrosion, so as to lay the foundation for further expanding the application of Ti6Al4V alloys.

2. Experimental Materials and Methods

2.1. Micro-Arc Oxidation Coating Preparation

The experiment material was a Ti6Al4V alloy with a chemical composition of 6.3 wt% Al, 4.2 wt% V, 0.15 wt% O, 0.11 wt% Fe, 0.03 wt% C, 0.02 wt% N, 0.001 wt% H and balance Ti. Specimens with a size of 50 mm × 30 mm × 6 mm were ground using 200#, 400#, 800# and 1200# SiC water sandpaper. The surface oil was removed by ultrasonic cleaning with anhydrous ethanol for 15 min, then rinsing with deionized water and drying.
A model of a micro-arc oxidation power supply was used, with the electrolytic cell as the cathode and the specimen as the anode. The power supply was operated by selecting a constant voltage mode of 500 V for 20 min. The pulse frequency and duty ratio were 600 Hz and 20%, respectively. The electrolyte was prepared using Na2SiO3 (8 g/L), Na(PO4)6 (3 g/L), NaOH (1 g/L) and C3H8O3 (6 mL/L) in distilled water. α-Al2O3 nanoparticles (0, 1, 3 or 5 g/L) with 150 nm particle size were added.

2.2. Organizational Structure Analysis and Performance Testing

A scanning electron microscope (SEM, MIRA4, TESCAN, Brno, Czech Republic) was used to observe the microscopic morphology of the micro-arc oxidation coatings. An X-ray diffractometer (XRD, Empyrean, Panaco, Almelo, The Netherlands) was used to analyze the phase structure. The thickness was measured using a coating thickness tester (ATS230, Test TIME, Beijing, China). The surface roughness was characterized using a confocal microscope (LSM900, ZEISS, Oberkochen, Germany). A microhardness tester (HVS-1000B, Zhongte, Dongguan, China) was used with a load of 500 g and 10 s. The tribological properties of the samples were tested using a UMT-2 tribological wear tester (UMT-2, CETR, San Jose, CA, USA) with a load of 2 N. The Tafel polarization curves of the Ti6Al4V alloy substrate and its micro-arc oxide film were tested using a CHI600E electrochemical workstation to obtain the corrosion current density, icorr, and corrosion potential, Ecorr, and to calculate the polarization resistance, Rp, of the film.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of α-Al2O3 Concentration on the Thickness of Micro-Arc Oxidation Coatings

Figure 1 shows the variation of thickness of micro-arc oxidation coatings on Ti6Al4V alloys with different mass concentrations of α-Al2O3. The thickness increases slightly with the increase of α-Al2O3 concentration, and the maximum thickness is 50.22 μm. This is due to the increased conductivity of the electrolyte as a result of the addition of α-Al2O3 nanoparticles, which increases the ion concentration in the micro-arc oxidation process. The Ti6Al4V alloy produces more arc discharge centers on the surface, making the micro-arc oxidation process more intense. On the other hand, during the liquid-quenching process, α-Al2O3 nanoparticles can be used as nucleation cores to accelerate the coating growth, and participate in the coating-formation reaction through filling.

3.2. Effect of α-Al2O3 on the Microscopic Morphology of Micro-Arc Oxidation Coating

Figure 2 and Figure 3 show the microscopic morphology and surface roughness variation of Ti6Al4V alloy micro-arc oxidation coatings under different α-Al2O3 nanoparticle concentrations. When the α-Al2O3 nanoparticle concentration is 3 g/L (as in Figure 2c), the number and size of micropores on the surface decreases, and the defects, such as microcracks, are significantly reduced. It can be inferred that the addition of an appropriate amount of α-Al2O3 nanoparticles to the electrolyte helps to improve the coating densities and defects. This is because the α-Al2O3 nanoparticles increase the electrical conductivity of the electrolyte solution, and their high surface activity. A large number of ions are attracted by the nanoparticles and agglomerate on the surface of the Ti6Al4V alloy during the reaction process, which promotes the micro-arc oxidation reaction, and increases the micro-arc discharge energy and the size of the individual arc discharge areas. The molten material spreads uniformly on the surface of the substrate. As such, the number of pores is reduced, which is consistent with the more intense reaction and increased intensity of arc light during the micro-arc oxidation process. Meanwhile, some α-Al2O3 nanoparticles are adsorbed onto the surface and embed into the coating during the reaction, resulting in the channels generated by the arc discharge being repaired by the particle volume effect.

3.3. Effect of α-Al2O3 Concentration on the Physical Phase Composition of Micro-Arc Oxidation Coatings

Figure 4 shows the XRD patterns of Ti6Al4V alloy micro-arc oxidation coatings with different mass concentrations of added α-Al2O3 nanoparticles. The diffraction peak intensity of the original phase slightly changes with the increase of the addition of α-Al2O3 nanoparticles. Compared with the coating prepared in the electrolyte without α-Al2O3, the intensity of the Rutile-TiO2 diffraction peaks in the coating prepared with α-Al2O3 was increased. This is due to the increase in electrolyte conductivity because of the aggregation of α-Al2O3 nanoparticles. This results in an increase in arc-discharge energy and a higher instantaneous sintering reaction temperature in the microzone, which is favorable for the high-temperature conversion of Anatase-TiO2. In addition, α-Al2O3 and Al2TiO5 phases also appear in the coating prepared by adding α-Al2O3 nanoparticles to the electrolyte.
Diffraction peaks of titanium metal were observed in the XRD pattern from the matrix Ti6Al4V alloy, which is due to X-ray penetration through the micropores and discharge channel to the matrix. When the thickness of the coating is deeper, the X-ray penetration becomes difficult and the intensity of the titanium diffraction peaks is reduced. The XRD pattern contains a typical amorphous material “bun peak” form in the interval of 15°–25°. The silicon oxide and phosphide diffraction peaks are not found. It is presumed that some of the oxides containing SiO2 and phosphorus exist in the coating in the form of an amorphous phase.

3.4. Effect of α-Al2O3 Concentration on the Microhardness of Micro-Arc Oxidation Coatings

The effects of α-Al2O3 additives on the microhardness of Ti6Al4V alloy micro-arc oxidation coatings at different concentrations are shown in Figure 5. With the increase of α-Al2O3 concentration, the microhardness of the coating showed a varied pattern of first increasing and then slightly decreasing. When the concentration was 3 g/L, the microhardness reached a maximum of 903.58 HV, which is a 161% increase compared with the Ti6Al4V alloy substrate. Combined with the analysis of the thickness, surface morphology and phase composition of the micro-arc oxidized composite, it can be seen that the addition of α-Al2O3 nanoparticles makes the coating structure more dense and generates more of a high-hardness Rutile-TiO2 phase, which increases the microhardness of the film layer to a certain extent. However, its impact is limited and the increase of the microhardness is small. When the concentration of α-Al2O3 nanoparticles was 5 g/L, the surface structure produced defects, which led to a decrease of the composite film layer microhardness.

3.5. Effect of α-Al2O3 Concentration on the Frictional Wear Properties of Micro-Arc Oxidation Coatings

Figure 6 shows the changes of friction factors of the prepared micro-arc oxidation coatings and Ti6Al4V alloy under dry friction sliding conditions at different α-Al2O3 nanoparticle concentrations. It can be seen that the friction factor of the Ti6Al4V alloy matrix starts to increase from about 0.1 after the start of the friction test, and enters into a stable frictional wear stage after a rising period of approx. 80 s, with a friction factor of approx. 0.61.
Figure 7 is a schematic diagram of the friction mechanism of a micro-arc oxidation coating. Due to the sparse surface layer roughness, with a more uneven microporous structure and protruding ceramic particles, contact of a GCr15 steel ball with the micro-arc oxidation coating generated an impact vibration. The stress is first concentrated in the outermost sparse raised layer, making the brittle ceramic materials sensitive to the repeated impact effect produced by crushing. Serious damage to the outer oxide layer occurs and sharp ceramic abrasive chips are produced. Some of the abrasive chips that accumulate during the subsequent repeated grinding and pushing process in the sliding surface, accumulate into the low-lying pits, and GCr15 steel ball grinding wear occurs. The extremely high hardness of the ceramic phase makes part of the material adhere to the anti-wear interface after plowing of the steel ball, and the wear mechanism changes to abrasive wear and adhesive wear caused by material transfer. As a result, the friction curve of a micro-arc oxidation coating specimen without the addition of α-Al2O3 nanoparticles jittered more strongly, and the friction factor in the stable period increased to 0.72, which is higher than that of a Ti6Al4V alloy without surface-strengthening treatment. It shows that the micro-arc oxidation coating has a good protective effect on the substrate.
The friction factor of the micro-arc oxidation coating prepared at a concentration of 3 g/L of α-Al2O3 nanoparticles increased rapidly to a steady state after the start of the friction test, with a friction factor of 0.41, which was 0.2 lower compared to that of the Ti6Al4V alloy. Figure 8 shows the friction mechanism of the micro-arc oxidation coating containing α-Al2O3 nanoparticles and a GCr15 steel ball, showing resistance against friction. The wear resistance is related to the alloy’s structure and hardness, which generates more hard Rutile-TiO2 and introduces new Al2TiO5. They provide hard bearings for the coating, and avoids its excessive wear loss. Meanwhile, the α-Al2O3 nanoparticles are evenly dispersed inside the coating, and during frictional contact with the GCr15 steel ball, the α-Al2O3 nanoparticles undergo shear and transfer, and reduce the friction of the sliding interface during the friction process. The friction property of some areas is changed from sliding friction to rolling friction, which reduces the friction factor.

3.6. Effect of α-Al2O3 Concentration on the Corrosion Resistance of Micro-Arc Oxidation Coatings

The kinetic potential polarization curves of a Ti6Al4V alloy and micro-arc oxidation coatings prepared with different concentrations of α-Al2O3 additives are shown in Figure 9. Table 1 shows the fitted corrosion potential, Ecorr, corrosion current density, icorr, and linear polarization resistance, Rp. Since the coating played a protective role for the titanium alloy by preventing the direct contact between a NaCl corrosive solution and the Ti6Al4V alloy, all the specimens treated by micro-arc oxidation showed a strong corrosion resistance compared with the Ti6Al4V alloy. The magnitude of the corrosion current density, icorr, of the coating prepared without α-Al2O3 is 6.63 × 10−6 A/cm2, which is an order of magnitude lower than the icorr of the substrate (2.25 × 10−5 A/cm2). The corrosion potential has an increase of 226 mV.
Compared with a coating prepared without the addition of α-Al2O3 nanoparticles, the corrosion current density, icorr, of the coating was further reduced to 7.99 × 10−7 A/cm2 when the additive concentration was 3 g/L. Its linear polarization resistance, Rp, was elevated to 5.85 × 104 Ω/cm2, which was improved by one order of magnitude, and the corrosion potential was increased to 197 mV. The corrosion resistance was further enhanced, which can be attributed to the following:
  • The α-Al2O3 nanoparticles contained in the coating play a certain role in repairing the discharge channels (see Figure 10) and reducing the number of penetration holes. This makes the coating more dense, and effectively isolates the external corrosive environment from corrosive factors such as Cl ions, which plays an important role in improving the corrosion resistance.
  • After the addition of α-Al2O3 nanoparticles, the coating contains new phases of α-Al2O3 and Al2TiO5 in addition to Anatase-TiO2 and Rutile-TiO2. The α-Al2O3 nanoparticles are diffusely distributed in the coating, while Al2TiO5 has a high hardness and strong corrosion resistance. Its isolation reduces the electrochemical corrosion tendency of the specimen and further improves the corrosion resistance.
  • The thickness of micro-arc oxidation coatings prepared by adding an appropriate amount of α-Al2O3 to the electrolyte increases due to the increased electrolyte conductivity. It helps to slow the intrusion of corrosive media to the substrate to a certain extent.
  • The growth process of the coating is mainly by the breakdown melting of the substrate and the transient cooling of the molten material in the electrolyte. Based on the good toughness of α-Al2O3 nanoparticles, embedding them in the coating is beneficial to reduce internal stress, which is helpful to improve the corrosion resistance.

3.7. Growth Mechanism of the Ti6Al4V Alloy Micro-Arc Oxide Coatings

The Ti6Al4V alloy micro-arc oxidation coating growth process is shown in Figure 11. At the initial stage of micro-arc oxidation, the applied voltage is lower than the arc starting voltage of the titanium alloy, and small bubbles are generated on the surface of the specimen with a piercing current sound, at which time the current flows to the cathode through the anode and the electrolyte reacts electrolytically under the action of the applied voltage, as in Equations (1) and (2).
4OH − 4e → 2H2O + O2
2H2O → 2H2↑ + O2
During the constant voltage mode, the oxidation voltage is rapidly increased to a set value, and under the action of a strong electric field, OH ions are ionized in the electrolyte, and Ti4+ is ionized in the titanium alloy substrate, both positive and negative ions are adsorbed onto the surface of the substrate and combine under the electric field force to form fused oxide TiO2 (as in Equations (3) and (4)), which is ejected outward through the discharge channel and uniformly distributed on the breakdown site of the specimen, and into the electrolyte. A ceramic porous coating is formed by solidification under the cooling effect of the electrolyte. The coating grows gradually by the cyclic discharge effect of the pulsed high-voltage electric field on the substrate.
Ti → Ti4+ + 4e
Ti4+ + OH → TiO2 + 2H2O
In the late stage of oxidation, the equivalent resistance of the micro-arc oxidation coating increases, electric breakdown occurs only at the microholes or weak positions on the surface, the high-brightness arc light appears locally and lasts longer, the growth rate of the coating decreases significantly and the internal phase change is dominated by a high temperature at this time.
From the above analysis, it can be seen that the electrolyte and the substrate material can not come into contact with each other due to blockage by insulating substances, such as passivation coating and gas barriers on the substrate surface. However, the discharge channel formed on the metal surface under the action of a strong electric field allows bilateral material reactions. While dielectric breakdown occurs, anions and cations migrate and react, generating new substances that cool and solidify on the alloy surface to form an initial oxide coating, which grows mainly inward as part of the substrate surface is melted at this time. The initial coating is formed in the weak microregion, and the process of “breakdown, reaction, condensation, and re-breakdown” continues, so the coating can continue to grow. The coating then thickens, and the growth direction also changes to outward growth.
When α-Al2O3 nanoparticles exist in the electrolyte, some α-Al2O3 nanoparticles are embedded in the coating by adsorption through electrophoretic force, molecular thermal motion and external impact. Meanwhile, excess α-Al2O3 nanoparticles and Ti4+ generated on the surface of the anode Ti6Al4V alloy, under the action of a strong electric field, undergo the chemical reaction of Equation (5) to generate Al2TiO5 phase.
TiO2 + α-Al2O3 (at an excess) → Al2TiO5·Al2O3 (1573 K)
Figure 12 shows the growth curves of micro-arc oxidation coatings with different α-Al2O3 nanoparticle concentrations. The thickness of the micro-arc oxidation coating increases rapidly in the initial stage of oxidation with or without the addition of α-Al2O3 nanoparticles, and the slope of the coating thickness curve decreases and the growth rate decreases after about 500 s of oxidation time. Analysis shows that the growth rate of the micro-arc oxidation coating depends on the number of breakdown channels generated by the discharge. In the early stage of oxidation, dielectric breakdown occurs in a large number of micro-areas on the substrate surface, resulting in a large number of small discharge channels through which the electrolyte material and the molten material of the substrate metal can contact and react. However, the thickness of the film layer increases continuously with the oxidation process, and the number of discharge channels gradually decreases due to the increase of the equivalent resistance, Rp, of the coating under a constant applied voltage, E, which is lower than the breakdown voltage, resulting in a decrease of the coating growth rate. The growth rate decreases continuously.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, α-Al2O3 nanoparticles were added to the electrolyte during micro-arc oxidation, and the effects of the mass concentration on the thickness, microscopic morphology, roughness, physical phase composition, microhardness, friction wear properties and corrosion resistance of the micro-arc oxidation coating were investigated. The conclusions are as follows:
  • The surface density of the coating is significantly improved by embedding α-Al2O3 nanoparticles, and the number of micropores and defects, such as grooves and pits, on the surface are reduced. The coating contains Ti, Anatase-TiO2 and Rutile-TiO2 phases. The diffraction peak intensity of the Rutile-TiO2 phase is improved by the addition of α-Al2O3 nanoparticles. In addition, some α-Al2O3 nanoparticles are embedded in the coating, and a new Al2TiO5 phase is generated.
  • With the increase of α-Al2O3 nanoparticle concentration in the electrolyte, the thickness of the coating increased slightly, and reached a maximum value of 50.22 μm when the particle concentration was 5 g/L. The surface roughness of the coating decreased and then increased, and the roughness, Ra, reached a minimum value of 3.82 μm when the particle concentration was 3 g/L; the surface was the flattest at this time. The microhardness of the coating increased, then decreased, and reached a maximum value of 903.58 HV when the concentration was 3 g/L.
  • Compared with the Ti6Al4V alloy, the micro-arc oxidation coating has better wear resistance. The coating prepared with 3 g/L of α-Al2O3 nanoparticles has a stable friction factor of 0.41 and the best frictional wear performance, mainly because it has the lowest roughness and the highest surface hardness. The α-Al2O3 nanoparticles have a friction-reducing effect, and the surface micropores provide space for storage of generated abrasive chips.
  • When the concentration of α-Al2O3 nanoparticles is 3 g/L, the good density and the isolation of Rutile-TiO2, α-Al2O3 and Al2TiO5 phases in the coating protect the substrate from corrosive solutions to a certain extent. The linear polarization resistance, Rp, is increased to 5.85 × 104 Ω/cm2, which is improved by one order of magnitude, and the corrosion potential of the specimen is 197 mV, an increase of 312 mV, and the corrosion current density, icorr, is 7.99 × 10−7 A/cm2, a decrease of two orders of magnitude.

Author Contributions

Performing experiment, data analysis, picture processing and manuscriptwriting, Y.C.; financial support, supervision, manuscript revision, manuscript revision, M.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript..

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Niazi, H.; Golestani-Fard, F.; Wang, W.; Shahmiri, M.; Zargar, H.R.; Alfantazi, A.; Bayati, R. Structure-property correlation in EEMAO fabricated TiO2-Al2O3 nanocomposite coatings. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 5538–5547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cui, C.; Hu, B.; Zhao, L.; Liu, S. Titanium alloy production technology, market prospects and industry development. Mater. Des. 2010, 32, 1684–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Khanna, R.; Kokubo, T.; Matsushita, T.; Nomura, Y.; Nose, N.; Oomori, Y.; Yoshida, T.; Wakita, K.; Takadama, H. Novel artificial hip joint: A layer of alumina on Ti-6Al-4V alloy formed by micro-arc oxidation. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2015, 55, 393–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rodriguez, L.; Vieu, A.; Balsarin, M.; Combes, P.; Alexis, J.; Esvan, J.; Lesko, S.; Denape, J.; Paris, J.; Delbé, K. Physico-chemical characterisation and tribological behaviour of ground micro-arc oxidation coating on aluminium alloy—Comparison with hard anodised oxidation. Wear 2023, 516–517, 204591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rasool, G.; Stack, M. Tribo-oxidation maps for Ti against steel. Tribol. Int. 2015, 91, 258–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Ming, M.; Xinjian, Z.; Qian, X.; Jun, L.; Xiaodi, H. Preparation and tribological properties of self-lubricating TiO2/graphite composite coating on Ti6Al4V alloy. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012, 258, 8570–8576. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sun, L.; Ma, Y.; Fan, B.; Wang, S.; Wang, Z. Investigation of anti-corrosion property of hybrid coatings fabricated by combining PEC with MAO on pure magnesium. J. Magnes. Alloys 2022, 10, 2875–2888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kaseem, M.; Choel, C. The effect of in-situ reactive incorporation of MoOx on the corrosion behavior of Ti-6Al-4V alloy coated via micro-arc oxidation coating. Corros. Sci. 2021, 192, 109764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Somsanith, N.; Narayanan, T.S.; Kim, Y.K.; Park, I.S.; Bae, T.S.; Lee, M.H. Surface medication of Ti-15Mo alloy by thermal oxidation: Evaluation of surface characteristics and corrosion resistance in Ringer's solution. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 356, 1117–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Obadele, B.A.; Olubambi, P.A.; Andrews, A.; Pityana, S.; Mathew, M.T. Electrochemical behaviour of laser-clad Ti6Al4V with CP Ti in 0.1 M oxalic acid solution. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 646, 753–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hongxi, L.; Qian, X.; Xiaowei, Z.; Chuanqi, W.; Baoyin, T. Wear and corrosion behaviors of Ti6Al4V alloy biomedical materials by silver plasma immersion ion implantation process. Thin Solid Films 2012, 521, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Diamanti, M.; Sebastiani, M.; Mangione, V.; Del Curto, B.; Pedeferri, M.; Bemporad, E.; Cigada, A.; Carassiti, F. Multi-step anodizing on Ti6Al4V components to improve tribomechanical performances. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2013, 227, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, Y.; Yao, B.; Long, B.; Tian, H.; Wang, B. Preparation, characterization and mechanical properties of microarc oxidation coating formed on titanium in Al(OH)3 colloidal solution. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012, 258, 5238–5243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Roknian, M.; Fattah-Alhosseini, A.; Gashti, S.O.; Keshavarz, M.K. Study of the effect of ZnO nanoparticles addition to PEO coatings on pure titanium substrate: Microstructural analysis, antibacterial effect and corrosion behavior of coatings in Ringer's physiological solution. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 740, 330–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yasui, T.; Hayashi, K.; Fukumoto, M. Behaviors of Micro-Arcs, Bubbles, and Coating Growth during Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation of β-Titanium Alloy. Materials 2022, 16, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xiang, N.; Song, R.-G.; Zhao, J.; Li, H.; Wang, C.; Wang, Z.-X. Microstructure and mechanical properties of ceramic coatings formed on 6063 aluminium alloy by micro-arc oxidation. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2015, 25, 3323–3328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fazel, M.; Salimijazi, H.; Golozar, M.; Jazi, M.G. A comparison of corrosion, tribocorrosion and electrochemical impedance properties of pure Ti and Ti6Al4V alloy treated by micro-arc oxidation process. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 324, 751–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Qin, D.; Xu, G.; Yang, Y.; Chen, S. Multiphase Ceramic Coatings with High Hardness and Wear Resistance on 5052 Aluminum Alloy by a Microarc Oxidation Method. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 2431–2437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zeng, R.C.; Cui, L.Y.; Jiang, K.; Liu, R.; Zhao, B.D.; Zheng, Y.F. In Vitro Corrosion and Cytocompatibility of a Microarc Oxidation Coating and Poly(L-lactic acid) Composite Coating on Mg-1Li-1Ca Alloy for Orthopedic Implants. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 10014–10028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pavarini, M.; Moscatelli, M.; Candiani, G.; Tarsini, P.; Cochis, A.; Rimondini, L.; Chiesa, R. Influence of frequency and duty cycle on the properties of antibacterial borate-based PEO coatings on titanium for bone-contact applications. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 567, 150811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tavares, M.D.M.; Vitoriano, J.D.O.; da Silva, R.C.; Franco, A.R.; de Souza, G.B.; da Costa, J.A.P.; Alves-Junior, C. Effect of duty cycle and treatment time on electrolytic plasma oxidation of commercially pure Al samples. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2019, 8, 2141–2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wei, X.; Huang, H.; Sun, M.; Liu, W.; Qiu, J. Effects of honeycomb pretreatment on MAO coating fabricated on aluminum. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2019, 363, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Seyfoori, A.; Mirdamadi, S.; Khavandi, A.; Raufi, Z.S. Biodegradation behavior of micro-arc oxidized AZ31 magnesium alloys formed in two different electrolytes. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012, 261, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Arunnellaiappan, T.; Babu, N.K.; Krishna, L.R.; Rameshbabu, N. Influence of frequency and duty cycle on microstructure of plasma electrolytic oxidized AA7075 and the correlation to its corrosion behavior. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2015, 280, 136–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jiang, J.Y.; Xu, J.L.; Liu, Z.H.; Deng, L.; Sun, B.; Liu, S.D.; Wang, L.; Liu, H.Y. Preparation, corrosion resistance and hemocompatibility of the superhydrophobic TiO2 coatings on biomedical Ti-6Al-4V alloys. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 347, 591–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mu, M.; Liang, J.; Zhou, X.; Xiao, Q. One-step preparation of TiO2/MoS2 composite coating on Ti6Al4V alloy by plasma electrolytic oxidation and its tribological properties. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2013, 214, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Aliofkhazraei, M.; Rouhaghdam, A.S. Fabrication of TiC/WC ultra hard nanocomposite layers by plasma electrolysis and study of its characteristics. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2010, 205, S51–S56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, W.; Blawert, C.; Zheludkevich, M.L.; Lin, Y.; Talha, M.; Shi, Y.; Chen, L. Effects of graphene nanosheets on the ceramic coatings formed on Ti6Al4V alloy drill pipe by plasma electrolytic oxidation. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 789, 996–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yang, W.; Wu, S.; Xu, D.; Gao, W.; Yao, Y.; Guo, Q.; Chen, J. Preparation and performance of alumina ceramic coating doped with aluminum nitride by micro arc oxidation. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 17112–17116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shokouhfar, M.; Allahkaram, S. Effect of incorporation of nanoparticles with different composition on wear and corrosion behavior of ceramic coatings developed on pure titanium by micro arc oxidation. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2017, 309, 767–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Thickness of micro-arc oxidation coating with different α-Al2O3 nanoparticle concentrations.
Figure 1. Thickness of micro-arc oxidation coating with different α-Al2O3 nanoparticle concentrations.
Nanomaterials 13 01802 g001
Figure 2. Microstructure of micro-arc oxidation coatings with different α-Al2O3 concentrations. (a) 0 g/L; (b) 1 g/L; (c) 3 g/L; (d) 5 g/L
Figure 2. Microstructure of micro-arc oxidation coatings with different α-Al2O3 concentrations. (a) 0 g/L; (b) 1 g/L; (c) 3 g/L; (d) 5 g/L
Nanomaterials 13 01802 g002
Figure 3. Surface roughness of micro-arc oxidation coatings with different α-Al2O3 concentrations.
Figure 3. Surface roughness of micro-arc oxidation coatings with different α-Al2O3 concentrations.
Nanomaterials 13 01802 g003
Figure 4. Microstructure of micro-arc oxidation coatings with α-Al2O3 particle concentrations.
Figure 4. Microstructure of micro-arc oxidation coatings with α-Al2O3 particle concentrations.
Nanomaterials 13 01802 g004
Figure 5. Microhardness of micro-arc oxidation coatings with different α-Al2O3 concentrations.
Figure 5. Microhardness of micro-arc oxidation coatings with different α-Al2O3 concentrations.
Nanomaterials 13 01802 g005
Figure 6. The friction coefficient of micro-arc oxidation coatings with different α-Al2O3 particle concentrations.
Figure 6. The friction coefficient of micro-arc oxidation coatings with different α-Al2O3 particle concentrations.
Nanomaterials 13 01802 g006
Figure 7. Micro-arc oxidation coating friction mechanism diagram.
Figure 7. Micro-arc oxidation coating friction mechanism diagram.
Nanomaterials 13 01802 g007
Figure 8. Micro-arc oxidation coating friction mechanism diagram.
Figure 8. Micro-arc oxidation coating friction mechanism diagram.
Nanomaterials 13 01802 g008
Figure 9. Tafel curves of Ti6Al4V alloy and micro-arc oxidation coating with different α-Al2O3 concentrations.
Figure 9. Tafel curves of Ti6Al4V alloy and micro-arc oxidation coating with different α-Al2O3 concentrations.
Nanomaterials 13 01802 g009
Figure 10. α-Al2O3 nanoparticles repair the discharge channel.
Figure 10. α-Al2O3 nanoparticles repair the discharge channel.
Nanomaterials 13 01802 g010
Figure 11. The growth process diagram of micro-arc oxidation coating on Ti6Al4V alloy.
Figure 11. The growth process diagram of micro-arc oxidation coating on Ti6Al4V alloy.
Nanomaterials 13 01802 g011
Figure 12. Growth curves of micro-arc oxidation coatings.
Figure 12. Growth curves of micro-arc oxidation coatings.
Nanomaterials 13 01802 g012
Table 1. Results of Tafel curve fitting for Ti6Al4V and micro-arc oxidation coatings.
Table 1. Results of Tafel curve fitting for Ti6Al4V and micro-arc oxidation coatings.
Concentration/(g/L)Ecorr/Vicorr/(A/cm2)βa/(V·dec−1)βc/(V·dec−1)Rp/(Ω/cm2)
Ti6Al4V−0.5092.25 × 10−50.200.201.93 × 103
0−0.2836.63 × 10−60.190.317.71 × 103
1−0.2171.05 × 10−60.140.193.30 × 104
3−0.1977.99 × 10−70.190.245.85 × 104
5−0.2282.70 × 10−60.200.231.70 × 104
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, Y.; Yuan, M. Effect of α-Al2O3 Additive on the Surface Micro-Arc Oxidation Coating of Ti6Al4V Alloy. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 1802. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13111802

AMA Style

Chen Y, Yuan M. Effect of α-Al2O3 Additive on the Surface Micro-Arc Oxidation Coating of Ti6Al4V Alloy. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(11):1802. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13111802

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Yuke, and Meini Yuan. 2023. "Effect of α-Al2O3 Additive on the Surface Micro-Arc Oxidation Coating of Ti6Al4V Alloy" Nanomaterials 13, no. 11: 1802. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13111802

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop