Next Article in Journal
Heat Transfer Enhancement in the Microscale: Optimization of Fluid Flow
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of the Composition and Testing Modes on the Electrochemical Performance of Li-Rich Cathode Materials
Previous Article in Journal
Transfer Learning for Modeling Plasmonic Nanowire Waveguides
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recent Advances of Transition Metal Chalcogenides as Cathode Materials for Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 12
Issue 20
10.3390/nano12203625
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Advances in g-C3N4 for the Application of Perovskite Solar Cells

by
Jian Yang
1,2,
Yuhui Ma
2,
Jianping Yang
1,
Wei Liu
1,* and
Xing’ao Li
1,*
1
New Energy Technology Engineering Laboratory of Jiangsu Province, Institute of Advanced Materials, School of Science, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications (NJUPT), Nanjing 210023, China
2
Department of Mathematics and Physics, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211167, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(20), 3625; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12203625
Submission received: 24 September 2022 / Revised: 10 October 2022 / Accepted: 13 October 2022 / Published: 16 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanostructured Electrodes for High-Performance Supercapacitors and Batteries)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this study, graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) was extensively utilized as an electron transport layer or interfacial buffer layer for simultaneously realizing photoelectric performance and stability improvement of perovskite solar cells (PSCs). This review covers the different g-C3N4 nanostructures used as additive and surface modifier layers applied to PSCs. In addition, the mechanism of reducing the defect state in PSCs, including improving the crystalline quality of perovskite, passivating the grain boundaries, and tuning the energy level alignment, were also highlighted in this review. Currently, the power conversion efficiency of PSCs based on modified g-C3N4 has been increased up to 22.13%, and its unique two-dimensional (2D) package structure has enhanced the stability of PSCs, which can remain stable in the dark for over 1500 h. Finally, the potential challenges and perspectives of g-C3N4 incorporated into perovskite-based optoelectronic devices are also included in this review.

1. Introduction

Fossil fuels created a huge amount of pollution in the environment. Solar energy, as one of the main sources of clean and renewable energy, can solve both environmental pollution and energy demand. Perovskite solar cells (PSCs) are a new type of photovoltaic device that can directly convert solar energy into electrical energy [1,2]. Compared with silicon-based solar cells, the manufacturing cost of PSCs is lower, and their photoelectric characteristics are more prominent [3,4,5]. Moreover, the PSCs can be attached on the flexible substrate, significantly expanding its application scenarios [6,7]. Currently, the lab-scale power conversion efficiency (PCE) has been certified to boost efficiency up to 25.5% [8]. For realizing the commercialization of PSCs as soon as possible [9,10], several urgent breakthroughs are required, such as obtaining a higher PCE, longer-term stability, and eco-friendliness [11,12,13,14,15,16,17].
Generally, the structure of PSCs are composed of a hole transport layer (HTL), a perovskite layer, and an electron transport layer (ETL), along with counter electrodes [18,19]. The defect-induced recombination of photo-generated carriers significantly impacts the extraction and transportation of charges in PSCs [20,21,22,23], which severely diminishes the performance of PSCs, in including short-circuit current density (Jsc), PCE, current hysteresis and stability, etc. [24,25]. For PSCs, defects are mainly located at the interfaces of ETL/perovskite/HTL, as well as at the grain boundaries (GBs) of perovskite films [26,27,28]. Many routes have been explored to reduce defects in PSCs, including additive and interface engineering, etc. [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. Meanwhile, it is worth noting that the stability and eco-friendliness of the materials used in additive or interface engineering should also be taken into account.
Due to the polymeric feature, the surface of g-C3N4 abounds with N, -NH2, -NH-, and other groups, which are facile functionalized by surface modification [41,42,43]. Thus, g-C3N4 has been utilized in PSCs as an additive or interface engineering material, as depicted in Figure 1a [44,45]. Additionally, different nanostructures (bulk, nanosheets, nanoparticle and quantum dots, etc.) of g-C3N4 reveal diversified photoelectric characteristics [46,47]. In this work, we summarized the role of g-C3N4 in PSCs. The main role are as follows: first, facilitating electron transport or perovskite growth via adjusting the energy level or roughness of ETL, corresponding. Second, decreasing the deep electron defect state of PSCs via improving the crystalline quality of perovskite. Moreover, we looked into the development trend of applying g-C3N4 in perovskite-based optoelectronic devices.

2. g-C3N4 as an Additive in Perovskite Films

g-C3N4 is a metal–free, non–toxic, and high–yield polymeric semiconductor with an around 2.7 eV bandgap. More importantly, it has excellent thermal and chemical stability [46,48,49,50]. Consequently, g–C3N4 has been broadly used in pollutant degradation, sensing, optoelectronic devices, and other fields [51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60]. Figure 1b plotted the molecule structure diagrams of g–C3N4, based on tri–s–triazine connection patterns. The hexagon triazine ring is comprised of sp2 hybridized N and C atoms, with hydrogen bonds between the –NH2 groups and the N edge atoms, and they are linked at the end with a C–N bond, creating an extended network–like planar structure.

2.1. Pure g–C3N4 Nanosheets as an Additive

g–C3N4 nanosheets are π–conjugated nanomaterials with two–dimensional structure, and a larger specific surface area, thus conducting the separation of photo–generated charges [61,62]. In 2018, Jiang et al. reported pure g–C3N4 nanosheets mixed into a perovskite precursor solution as additives [63], suppressing nucleation and slowing down the growth of perovskite during the crystallization process; this results in the g–C3N4:CH3NH3PbI3 films have larger grain sizes and a lower defect density (nt). In 2019, Liao et al. used a method similar to that of Jiang et al. to add g-C3N4 nanosheets into perovskite films [64]. Importantly, they revealed the location of g-C3N4 in perovskite. Meanwhile, the mechanisms of defect passivation and charge extraction by g-C3N4 were clarified. From Figure 2a, it can be seen that g-C3N4 was uniformly anchored at the surface of the GBs, and the dangling Pb2+ can coordinate with the N atom in g-C3N4, retarding the crystallization of perovskite [65,66]. Moreover, the conductive g-C3N4 network condensed at the GBs can act as an efficient carrier shuttle, facilitating the electron transport. From the TRPL spectra, as presented in Figure 2b, for g-C3N4 additive CH3NH3PbI3 films, the PL lifetime reduce to 17 ns, which is less than that of the CH3NH3PbI3 films, indicating ultrafast photo–excited carrier transport due to the addition of g–C3N4 [67].
Yang et al. added g–C3N4 into carbon-based PSCs [68]. Additionally, the insulating layer was prepared on the surface of the ETL by spin-coating Al2O3 [69,70,71]. Figure 2c presents the fabrication procedure of the device. From the J-V curve, as shown in Figure 2d, it can be noted that the Jsc has barely changed after incorporating the Al2O3 layer, which suggests that the conductive g-C3N4 network at the GBs can provide electrons via a carrier shuttle. This can be proved from the TRPL spectra, as shown in Figure 2e. In the field of wearable electronics, g-C3N4 nanosheets were applied into flexible tin-based PSCs [72]. Figure 2f plots the device configuration: PDMS/hc-PEDOT:PSS/PEDOT:PSS/FASnI3/C60/BCP/Ag. The network structure of g-C3N4 indicates a better lattice match with formamidine cation, which is more conducive to the crystallization of FASnI3 films. The illustration of bonding and passivation between FASnI3 and g-C3N4 is shown in Figure 2g. Finally, the stabilized PCE of 8.56% was obtained.
Nanomaterials 12 03625 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Schematic illustration of the functions of g–C3N4 as an additive in perovskite films. (b) TRPL lifetime of g–C3N4:CH3NH3PbI3 and CH3NH3PbI3 films (reproduced with permission [64]; copyright 2019, Royal Society of Chemistry). (c) Fabrication procedure of a device with FTO/c–TiO2/m–TiO2/Al2O3/g–C3N4:CH3NH3PbI3/carbon. (d) J–V curves of the devices and (e) TRPL spectra of perovskite films (reproduced with permission [68]; copyright 2019, Elsevier). (f) Device configuration: PDMS/hc–PEDOT:PSS/PEDOT:PSS/FASnI3/C60/BCP/Ag. (g) Illustration of bonding and passivation between FASnI3 and g–C3N4 (reproduced with permission [72]; copyright 2021, John Wiley and Sons).
Figure 2. (a) Schematic illustration of the functions of g–C3N4 as an additive in perovskite films. (b) TRPL lifetime of g–C3N4:CH3NH3PbI3 and CH3NH3PbI3 films (reproduced with permission [64]; copyright 2019, Royal Society of Chemistry). (c) Fabrication procedure of a device with FTO/c–TiO2/m–TiO2/Al2O3/g–C3N4:CH3NH3PbI3/carbon. (d) J–V curves of the devices and (e) TRPL spectra of perovskite films (reproduced with permission [68]; copyright 2019, Elsevier). (f) Device configuration: PDMS/hc–PEDOT:PSS/PEDOT:PSS/FASnI3/C60/BCP/Ag. (g) Illustration of bonding and passivation between FASnI3 and g–C3N4 (reproduced with permission [72]; copyright 2021, John Wiley and Sons).
Nanomaterials 12 03625 g002

2.2. Functionalized g–C3N4 Nanosheets as an Additive

The pure g–C3N4 nanosheets tend to agglomerate in the organic or aqueous environment due to the robust van der Waals interactions, resulting in lower dispersibility [49,73]. However, the functionalized g–C3N4 nanosheets show good dispersity in liquid, mainly caused by the electrostatic repulsion of the charged groups [42]. Here, there are two main methods to achieve functionalized g–C3N4 nanosheets—doped, and surface modified [74,75].
In 2019, Cao et al. reported that iodine–doped g–C3N4 (g–CNI) was added into triple cation perovskite films as an additive [76]. Due to the fact that doped iodine can coordinate with dangling Pb2+ at GBs, the trap states in PSCs were effectively passivated [77,78]. Therefore, they achieved high–quality perovskite films with fewer trap states [65,79,80]. Figure 3a displays the mechanism of g–CNI modified PSCs. From the XPS spectra, as shown in Figure 3b, for perovskite with g–CNI, the I 3d signal is higher than that of the ref., suggesting the incorporation of g–CNI into the perovskite [81]. After adding g–CNI, the nt reduced to 1.07×1016 cm3 from 1.43 × 1016 cm3, with the maximum PCE of up to 18.28%.
Li et al. reported that surface–modified g–C3N4 with various organic groups (–NO3, –NH3, –SO3 and –OH) was mixed into perovskite films [41], which can improve crystalline quality and passivate defects state at the GBs. Specifically, for NO3–C3N4–based perovskite, the average crystallite size of up to 68 nm was achieved, as exhibited in Figure 3c, leading to a decent photovoltaic performance, which can be proved by the PL spectra, as shown in Figure 3d. It is worth noting that the PL intensity of NO3-C3N4–based perovskite film is the strongest compared to the other perovskite films. This can be ascribed to the better crystallinity of perovskite with the NO3–C3N4 addition, as well as a reduction in the trap states density. As a result, for p–i–n PSCs based on NO3–C3N4, the best PCE obtained was up to 20.08%.
Nanomaterials 12 03625 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Mechanism illustration of g–CNI modified PSCs. (b) XPS spectra of Pb 4f and I 3d in perovskite (reproduced with permission [76]; copyright 2019, Royal Society of Chemistry). (c) Average crystallite size. (d) PL spectra of perovskite films with different functionalized g–C3N4 (reproduced with permission [41]; copyright 2019, John Wiley and Sons). (e) FESEM images of U–g–C3N4 nanoparticles. (f) Scheme of g–C3N4 fragments coils into U–g–C3N4 nanoparticles. (g) Scheme of the U–g–C3N4 self–recognizing grain boundaries of CH3NH3PbI3 films (reproduced with permission [82]; copyright 2019, Elsevier).
Figure 3. (a) Mechanism illustration of g–CNI modified PSCs. (b) XPS spectra of Pb 4f and I 3d in perovskite (reproduced with permission [76]; copyright 2019, Royal Society of Chemistry). (c) Average crystallite size. (d) PL spectra of perovskite films with different functionalized g–C3N4 (reproduced with permission [41]; copyright 2019, John Wiley and Sons). (e) FESEM images of U–g–C3N4 nanoparticles. (f) Scheme of g–C3N4 fragments coils into U–g–C3N4 nanoparticles. (g) Scheme of the U–g–C3N4 self–recognizing grain boundaries of CH3NH3PbI3 films (reproduced with permission [82]; copyright 2019, Elsevier).
Nanomaterials 12 03625 g003

2.3. Ultrafine g–C3N4 Nanoparticles as an Additive

In 2019, Liu et al. reported that g–C3N4 nanoparticles were introduced into perovskite films as an additive [82]. Here, the ultrafine size of g–C3N4 nanoparticles is about 20–50 nm, which were successfully synthesized with exfoliated g–C3N4 nanosheets. The surface of ultrafine g–C3N4 nanoparticles (U–g–C3N4) is rich in O–H or N–H groups, which can easily bond with N–H bonds on CH3NH3PbI3 GBs [83]. Thus, it can self–recognize GBs and adhere to them, decreasing the deep electron trap state. The FESEM images of U–g–C3N4 nanoparticles are plotted in Figure 3e. Figure 3f presents the scheme of U–g–C3N4 nanoparticles from g–C3N4 fragments. Figure 3g describes the scheme of the U–g–C3N4 self–recognizing CH3NH3PbI3 GBs. Finally, the champion PCE of U–g–C3N4 based planar PSCs is up to 15.8%.

3. g–C3N4 as a Surface Modifier Layer

3.1. g–C3N4 Quantum Dots (g–CNQD) as Modifier Layer

g–C3N4 quantum dots are a type of zero–dimensional nanomaterial in which electrons and holes cannot move freely [84]. The tiny particle size creates its unique size effect, macroscopic quantum tunnel effect, edge effect [85], etc. In 2020, Chen et al. prepared g–CNQD via acid etching and hydrothermal cure [86]; the diameter of g–CNQD were about 5–10 nm, and they were added into an SnO2 colloid precursor, forming nanocomposite ETL (G–SnO2). Figure 4a exhibits the position of g–CNQD in SnO2. Tiny and conductive g–CNQD could reorganize the electronic density distribution of SnO2. The charge density difference between G–SnO2 and SnO2 is displayed in Figure 4b, which was obtained using the density functional theory. It can be seen that the vacancies surrounding the three Sn atoms interact with g–C3N4, and an obvious charge redistribution occurs around the oxygen vacancy, resulting in the elimination of the trap state defects [87]. Importantly, g–CNQD can effectively adjust the Fermi level of ETL, promoting electron transport [88,89]. The energy–level diagrams are shown in Figure 4c. For G–SnO2 based planar PSCs, the PCE is up to 22.13% with a Voc of 1.176 V. They also exhibit excellent long–term stability under ambient conditions, e.g., about 60% humidity [90].
Liu et al. published a similar report on g–CNQD. The g-CNQD was synthesized with urea and sodium citrate [91], the diameter was about 10–30 nm, and it was well monodispersed. In this work, g–CNQD were intercalated into the ETL/perovskite layer, which facilitates the formation of high–quality perovskite films due to the smoother surface of ETL [92,93]. Figure 4d presents the schematic illustration of the g–CNQD–based device. The roughness of the ETL was evaluated by AFM, as shown in Figure 4e. After intercalating g–CNQD, the root mean square roughness reduced from 17.5 nm to 12.8 nm, suggesting that a smoother ETL was obtained, which is conducive to perovskite growth [94]. From the SEM images and XRD spectra of the perovskite films as shown in Figure 4f,g, it can be seen that the g–CNQD based perovskite films have purer phases, fewer GBs, and lower trap states. Finally, the maximum PCE is noted, up to 21.23% under full air–processing, and without apparent current hysteresis.

3.2. g–C3N4 Nanosheets as a Modified Layer

In 2020, Liu et al. used multilayer g–C3N4 to simultaneously modify the upper and lower interfaces of perovskite [95]. For the perovskite/HTL interface, the dangling Pb2+ can coordinate with lone–pair electrons on g–C3N4, reducing the defects state at the perovskite film surface. For the ETL/perovskite interface, the Gibbs free energy of SnO2 surface was decreased, which facilitates the preparation of flat and non–pinhole perovskite films [96,97]. Figure 5a displays the schematic diagram of dual–modified PSCs with g–C3N4. The improvement of perovskite films can be seen from SEM, as shown in Figure 5b. A maximum PCE of 19.67% was obtained for planar PSCs with longer–term stability. The main reason for this was that g–C3N4 could reduce the surface defects of perovskite films, thus decreasing the migration of iodide and ion mobilization within the perovskite lattices. In 2021, Yang et al. adopted g–C3N4 nanosheets as a modified layer [98], and the work function of ETL was finely tuned, as shown in Figure 5c, resulting in the enhancement of Voc from 1.01 to 1.11 V, and diminishing the current hysteresis of PSCs. Therefore, the maximum PCE was boosted to 19.55% from its initial 15.81%. Yang et al. reported new buried layers for efficient perovskite [99], which are composed of a mixture of g–C3N4 and SnO2. Due to the fact that amine–rich g–C3N4 can promote the prenucleation of the Pb–related intermediates, the vertical crystallization of perovskite films were obviously optimized, exhibiting superior carrier transmission characteristics. Figure 5d presents the schematic illustration of vertical carrier transportation via buried manipulation.

3.3. Functionalized g–C3N4 as a Modified Layer

In 2019, Cruz et al. prepared thiazole–modified g–C3N4 via exfoliation treatment [101], then intercalated it in p–i–n PSCs as ETL. The charge recombination in the interface was suppressed due to the enhanced energy level of electronic interface [88]. Finally, the Voc of 1.09 V and the Jsc of 20.17 mA/cm2 were achieved. In 2021, Wang et al. prepared the functionalized g–C3N4 with thiophene or thiazole by thermal treatment [100]. Then, the functionalized g–C3N4 were intercalated between ETL and the perovskite layer. Notably, there was a well–matched energy level in the device. Due to the strong chemical affinity between Pb2+ and N or S atoms [67], the defect state in the device was efficiently passivated. Figure 5e shows the possible interface defect sites in perovskite, as well as the passivation of thiophene or thiazole. For the thiazole g–C3N4based device, the maximum PCE increased to 19.23% from pristine 13.42%, with the Voc increasing from 1.02 V. to 1.11 V.

4. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

In this paper, we summarize the recent progress of g–C3N4 application in PSCs. g–C3N4 is an eco–friendly polymeric semiconductor with a suitable bandgap. Recently, it has been widely applied in PSCs, which can reduce defect states in PSCs, and simultaneously enhance the PCE and long–term stability of PSCs. Specifically, different nanostructures of g–C3N4 (i.e., nanosheets, nanoparticles, and QDs) used as additive and surface modifier layers have been discussed in detail. The performance of the devices is listed in Table 1.
Pure g–C3N4 nanosheets are a kind of two–dimensional nanomaterial with large N, –NH2, –NH, and other groups, and the N atom in g–C3N4 can coordinate a bond with dangling Pb2+, increasing the perovskite grain size. Moreover, when it functions as an additive, the conductive g–C3N4 network acts as an efficient carrier shuttle, facilitating electron transport. g–C3N4 nanoparticles are formed by the self–coiling of the exfoliated g–C3N4 nanosheets, with an ultra–fine size (20–50 nm), and the surface of the g–C3N4 nanoparticles contains abundant O–H or N–H groups. Therefore, g–C3N4 nanoparticles can magically self–recognize GBs in perovskite films, decreasing the deep electron trap state of PSCs. Functionalized g–C3N4 nanosheets can also be achieved from nanosheets, but the former shows better dispersity in organic solvent. They exhibit a similar effect as additives. Specifically, when used as a modifier layer, they can adjust the energy level alignment of PSCs, making the electron transport more efficient. g–CNQD has a tiny particle size, which can adjust the energy level or roughness of the ETL, facilitating electron transport or perovskite growth, corresponding. These features give the PSCs potential for consideration as next–generation photovoltaic devices, as the most promising means of simultaneously solving environmental pollution and energy demand. The passivation of the perovskite layer is mainly used to improve the PCE and the long–term stability of PSCs. g–C3N4 can be added in different solutions to prepare efficient PSCs with long–term stability, which have the potential to compete with other conventional silicon cells in the future. Meanwhile, g–C3N4 shows great promise in solving external and internal concerns, including packaging, additional technology, and reducing charge recombination. Thus, the g–C3N4 can increase the grain size of perovskite and passivate the interface defect, making it more conducive to charge extraction. However, the development of the g–C3N4 nanostructure is still in its early stages. Additional methods for improving the efficiency and stability of PSCs require further exploration. We expect to develop new additives exhibiting eco–friendliness, long–term stability, and compatibility with flexible substrates, as well as other new strategies to improve the performance of perovskite. This effort should be closely connected to application of dedicated defect passivation strategies to produce high–performance and enduring stable PSCs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.Y. (Jian Yang); resources, W.L. and X.L.; writing—original draft preparation, J.Y. (Jianping Yang); writing—review and editing, W.L.; visualization, Y.M.; supervision, X.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of China (IRT1148), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52172205, 51872145, U1732126, 11804166, 51602161, 51372119), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2022M711685), the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (YX03001), the Natural Science Research Project of Jiangsu Universities (22KJB510035), and the Start-up Fund of Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications (NUPTSF, NY221029).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, H.; Lu, Y.; Han, W.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, W. Solar energy conversion and utilization: Towards the emerging photo-electrochemical devices based on perovskite photovoltaics. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 393, 124766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kovalenko, M.V.; Protesescu, L.; Bodnarchuk, M.I. Properties and potential optoelectronic applications of lead halide perovskite nanocrystals. Science 2017, 358, 745–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Wang, F.; Yang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Du, J.; Han, D.; Yang, L.; Fan, L.; Sui, Y.; Sun, Y.; Meng, X.; et al. Constructing m-TiO2/a-WOx hybrid electron transport layer to boost interfacial charge transfer for efficient perovskite solar cells. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 402, 126303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, H.; Ye, F.; Tang, W.; He, J.; Yin, M.; Wang, Y.; Xie, F.; Bi, E.; Yang, X.; Grätzel, M.; et al. A solvent- and vacuum-free route to large-area perovskite films for efficient solar modules. Nature 2017, 550, 92–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, H.; Chen, C.; Jin, J.; Bi, W.; Zhang, B.; Chen, X.; Xu, L.; Liu, D.; Dai, Q.; Song, H. Near-infrared and ultraviolet to visible photon conversion for full spectrum response perovskite solar cells. Nano Energy 2018, 50, 699–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Han, G.S.; Jung, H.S.; Park, N.-G. Recent cutting-edge strategies for flexible perovskite solar cells toward commercialization. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 11604–11612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tang, G.; Yan, F. Recent progress of flexible perovskite solar cells. Nano Today 2021, 39, 101155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kim, M.; Jeong, J.; Lu, H.; Lee, T.K.; Eickemeyer, F.T.; Liu, Y.; Choi, I.W.; Choi, S.J.; Jo, Y.; Kim, H.-B.; et al. Conformal quantum dot–SnO2 layers as electron transporters for efficient perovskite solar cells. Science 2022, 375, 302–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cheng, Y.; Ding, L. Pushing commercialization of perovskite solar cells by improving their intrinsic stability. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021, 14, 3233–3255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rong, Y.G.; Hu, Y.; Mei, A.Y.; Tan, H.R.; Saidaminov, M.I.; Seok, S.I.; McGehee, M.D.; Sargent, E.H.; Han, H.W. Challenges for commercializing perovskite solar cells. Science 2018, 361, eaat8235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, T.; Qin, Z.; Wang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Chen, W.; Zhang, S.; Cai, M.; Dai, S.; Zhang, J.; Liu, J.; et al. The Main Progress of Perovskite Solar Cells in 2020–2021. Nano-Micro Lett. 2021, 13, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, D.; Wright, M.; Elumalai, N.K.; Uddin, A. Stability of perovskite solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2016, 147, 255–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Babayigit, A.; Ethirajan, A.; Muller, M.; Conings, B. Toxicity of organometal halide perovskite solar cells. Nat. Mater. 2016, 15, 247–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kim, M.-c.; Ham, S.-Y.; Cheng, D.; Wynn, T.A.; Jung, H.S.; Meng, Y.S. Advanced Characterization Techniques for Overcoming Challenges of Perovskite Solar Cell Materials. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2001753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fan, R.; Huang, Y.; Wang, L.; Li, L.; Zheng, G.; Zhou, H. The Progress of Interface Design in Perovskite-Based Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1600460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Arjun, V.; Muthukumaran, K.P.; Ramachandran, K.; Nithya, A.; Karuppuchamy, S. Fabrication of efficient and stable planar perovskite solar cell using copper oxide as hole transport material. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 923, 166285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, S.; Zhang, X.; Xue, X.; Wu, Y.; Hao, Y.; Zhang, C.; Liu, Y.; Dai, Z.; Sun, Q.; Hao, Y. Importance of tin (II) acetate additives in sequential deposited fabrication of Sn-Pb-based perovskite solar cells. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 904, 164050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhao, Z.; Sun, W.; Li, Y.; Ye, S.; Rao, H.; Gu, F.; Liu, Z.; Bian, Z.; Huang, C. Simplification of device structures for low-cost, high-efficiency perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 4756–4773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Correa-Baena, J.-P.; Abate, A.; Saliba, M.; Tress, W.; Jesper Jacobsson, T.; Grätzel, M.; Hagfeldt, A. The rapid evolution of highly efficient perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 710–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ma, Y.; Deng, K.; Gu, B.; Cao, F.; Lu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Li, L. Boosting Efficiency and Stability of Perovskite Solar Cells with CdS Inserted at TiO2/Perovskite Interface. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 3, 1600729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Taheri, S.; Ahmadkhan kordbacheh, A.; Minbashi, M.; Hajjiah, A. Effect of defects on high efficient perovskite solar cells. Opt. Mater. 2021, 111, 110601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ke, W.; Fang, G.; Wan, J.; Tao, H.; Liu, Q.; Xiong, L.; Qin, P.; Wang, J.; Lei, H.; Yang, G.; et al. Efficient hole-blocking layer-free planar halide perovskite thin-film solar cells. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Li, B.; Ferguson, V.; Silva, S.R.P.; Zhang, W. Defect Engineering toward Highly Efficient and Stable Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 5, 1800326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tavakoli, M.M.; Yadav, P.; Tavakoli, R.; Kong, J. Surface Engineering of TiO2 ETL for Highly Efficient and Hysteresis-Less Planar Perovskite Solar Cell (21.4%) with Enhanced Open-Circuit Voltage and Stability. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1800794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Montoya, D.M.; Pérez-Gutiérrez, E.; Barbosa-Garcia, O.; Bernal, W.; Maldonado, J.-L.; Percino, M.J.; Meneses, M.-A.; Cerón, M. Defects at the interface electron transport layer and alternative counter electrode, their impact on perovskite solar cells performance. Sol. Energy 2020, 195, 610–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dong, Y.; Li, W.; Zhang, X.; Xu, Q.; Liu, Q.; Li, C.; Bo, Z. Highly Efficient Planar Perovskite Solar Cells Via Interfacial Modification with Fullerene Derivatives. Small 2016, 12, 1098–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jain, S.M.; Phuyal, D.; Davies, M.L.; Li, M.; Philippe, B.; De Castro, C.; Qiu, Z.; Kim, J.; Watson, T.; Tsoi, W.C.; et al. An effective approach of vapour assisted morphological tailoring for reducing metal defect sites in lead-free, (CH3NH3)3Bi2I9 bismuth-based perovskite solar cells for improved performance and long-term stability. Nano Energy 2018, 49, 614–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Ali, J.; Li, Y.; Gao, P.; Hao, T.; Song, J.; Zhang, Q.; Zhu, L.; Wang, J.; Feng, W.; Hu, H.; et al. Interfacial and structural modifications in perovskite solar cells. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 5719–5745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Han, T.H.; Tan, S.; Xue, J.; Meng, L.; Lee, J.W.; Yang, Y. Interface and Defect Engineering for Metal Halide Perovskite Optoelectronic Devices. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1803515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Qiu, L.; Ono, L.K.; Jiang, Y.; Leyden, M.R.; Raga, S.R.; Wang, S.; Qi, Y. Engineering Interface Structure to Improve Efficiency and Stability of Organometal Halide Perovskite Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. B 2018, 122, 511–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Bai, Y.; Meng, X.; Yang, S. Interface Engineering for Highly Efficient and Stable Planar p-i-n Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1701883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Vasilopoulou, M.; Fakharuddin, A.; Coutsolelos, A.G.; Falaras, P.; Argitis, P.; Yusoff, A.; Nazeeruddin, M.K. Molecular materials as interfacial layers and additives in perovskite solar cells. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 4496–4526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Boopathi, K.M.; Mohan, R.; Huang, T.-Y.; Budiawan, W.; Lin, M.-Y.; Lee, C.-H.; Ho, K.-C.; Chu, C.-W. Synergistic improvements in stability and performance of lead iodide perovskite solar cells incorporating salt additives. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 1591–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gong, X.; Li, M.; Shi, X.-B.; Ma, H.; Wang, Z.-K.; Liao, L.-S. Controllable Perovskite Crystallization by Water Additive for High-Performance Solar Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 6671–6678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kang, Y.F.; Wang, A.R.; Li, R.; Song, Y.L.; Dong, Q.F. A Review: Flexible Perovskite Solar Cells towards High Mechanical Stability. Acta Polym. Sin. 2021, 52, 920–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jiang, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, X.; Yang, X.; Chen, Y.; Chu, Z.; Ye, Q.; Li, X.; Yin, Z.; You, J. Surface passivation of perovskite film for efficient solar cells. Nat. Photonics 2019, 13, 460–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhao, X.; Tao, L.; Li, H.; Huang, W.; Sun, P.; Liu, J.; Liu, S.; Sun, Q.; Cui, Z.; Sun, L.; et al. Efficient Planar Perovskite Solar Cells with Improved Fill Factor via Interface Engineering with Graphene. Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 2442–2449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ioakeimidis, A.; Choulis, S.A. Nitrobenzene as Additive to Improve Reproducibility and Degradation Resistance of Highly Efficient Methylammonium-Free Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells. Materials 2020, 13, 3289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chu, L.; Ahmad, W.; Liu, W.; Yang, J.; Zhang, R.; Sun, Y.; Yang, J.; Li, X.A. Lead-Free Halide Double Perovskite Materials: A New Superstar Toward Green and Stable Optoelectronic Applications. Nano-Micro Lett. 2019, 11, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Li, Y.; Wang, D.; Yang, L.; Yin, S. Preparation and performance of perovskite solar cells with two dimensional MXene as active layer additive. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 904, 163742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, Z.; Wu, S.; Zhang, J.; Yuan, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhu, Z. Improving Photovoltaic Performance Using Perovskite/Surface-Modified Graphitic Carbon Nitride Heterojunction. Sol. RRL 2019, 4, 1900413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Majdoub, M.; Anfar, Z.; Amedlous, A. Emerging Chemical Functionalization of g-C3N4: Covalent/Noncovalent Modifications and Applications. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 12390–12469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Pu, Y.-C.; Fan, H.-C.; Liu, T.-W.; Chen, J.-W. Methylamine lead bromide perovskite/protonated graphitic carbon nitride nanocomposites: Interfacial charge carrier dynamics and photocatalysis. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 25438–25449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jia, C.; Yang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Xiao, K.; Xu, J.; Liu, J. Graphitic Carbon Nitride Films: Emerging Paradigm for Versatile Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 53571–53591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Javad, S.; Guoxiu, W. Progress and prospects of two-dimensional materials for membrane-based osmotic power generation. Nano Res. Energy 2022, 1, e9120008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Thomas, A.; Fischer, A.; Goettmann, F.; Antonietti, M.; Müller, J.-O.; Schlögl, R.; Carlsson, J.M. Graphitic carbon nitride materials: Variation of structure and morphology and their use as metal-free catalysts. J. Mater. Chem. 2008, 18, 4893–4908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Ismael, M. A review on graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) based nanocomposites: Synthesis, categories, and their application in photocatalysis. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 846, 156446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cao, Q.; Kumru, B.; Antonietti, M.; Schmidt, B.V.K.J. Graphitic carbon nitride and polymers: A mutual combination for advanced properties. Mater. Horiz. 2020, 7, 762–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Niu, X.; Yi, Y.; Bai, X.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, Z.; Chu, L.; Yang, J.; Li, X. Photocatalytic performance of few-layer graphitic g-C3N4: Enhanced by interlayer coupling. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 4101–4107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lu, D.; Fang, P.; Wu, W.; Ding, J.; Jiang, L.; Zhao, X.; Li, C.; Yang, M.; Li, Y.; Wang, D. Solvothermal-assisted synthesis of self-assembling TiO2 nanorods on large graphitic carbon nitride sheets with their anti-recombination in the photocatalytic removal of Cr(vi) and rhodamine B under visible light irradiation. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 3231–3245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Wang, A.; Wang, C.; Fu, L.; Wong-Ng, W.; Lan, Y. Recent Advances of Graphitic Carbon Nitride-Based Structures and Applications in Catalyst, Sensing, Imaging, and LEDs. Nano-Micro Lett. 2017, 9, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Niu, P.; Zhang, L.; Liu, G.; Cheng, H.-M. Graphene-Like Carbon Nitride Nanosheets for Improved Photocatalytic Activities. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 4763–4770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lu, D.; Wang, H.; Zhao, X.; Kondamareddy, K.K.; Ding, J.; Li, C.; Fang, P. Highly Efficient Visible-Light-Induced Photoactivity of Z-Scheme g-C3N4/Ag/MoS2 Ternary Photocatalysts for Organic Pollutant Degradation and Production of Hydrogen. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 1436–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ou, M.; Tu, W.; Yin, S.; Xing, W.; Wu, S.; Wang, H.; Wan, S.; Zhong, Q.; Xu, R. Amino-Assisted Anchoring of CsPbBr3 Perovskite Quantum Dots on Porous g-C3N4 for Enhanced Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 13570–13574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mamba, G.; Mishra, A.K. Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) nanocomposites: A new and exciting generation of visible light driven photocatalysts for environmental pollution remediation. Appl. Catal. B-environ. 2016, 198, 347–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ansari, M.S.; Banik, A.; Qureshi, M. Morphological tuning of photo-booster g-C3N4 with higher surface area and better charge transfers for enhanced power conversion efficiency of quantum dot sensitized solar cells. Carbon 2017, 121, 90–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yuan, Z.; Tang, R.; Zhang, Y.; Yin, L. Enhanced photovoltaic performance of dye-sensitized solar cells based on Co9S8 nanotube array counter electrode and TiO2/g-C3N4 heterostructure nanosheet photoanode. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 691, 983–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Xie, F.; Dong, G.; Wu, K.; Li, Y.; Wei, M.; Du, S. In situ synthesis of g-C3N4 by glass-assisted annealing route to boost the efficiency of perovskite solar cells. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 591, 326–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gao, Q.; Sun, S.; Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Duan, L.; Lu, W. Enhancing Performance of CdS Quantum Dot-Sensitized Solar Cells by Two-Dimensional g-C3N4 Modified TiO2 Nanorods. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2016, 11, 463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Zou, J.; Liao, G.; Wang, H.; Ding, Y.; Wu, P.; Hsu, J.-P.; Jiang, J. Controllable interface engineering of g-C3N4/CuS nanocomposite photocatalysts. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 911, 165020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sheng, Y.; Zhao, A.; Yu, L.; Yuan, S.; Di, Y.; Liu, C.; Dong, L.; Gan, Z. Highly Efficient Charge Transfer between Perovskite Nanocrystals and g-C3N4 Nanosheets. Phys. Status Solidi (B) 2020, 257, 2000198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wang, K.; Liu, J.; Yin, J.; Aydin, E.; Harrison, G.T.; Liu, W.; Chen, S.; Mohammed, O.F.; De Wolf, S. Defect Passivation in Perovskite Solar Cells by Cyano-Based π-Conjugated Molecules for Improved Performance and Stability. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2002861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Jiang, L.-L.; Wang, Z.-K.; Li, M.; Zhang, C.-C.; Ye, Q.-Q.; Hu, K.-H.; Lu, D.-Z.; Fang, P.-F.; Liao, L.-S. Passivated Perovskite Crystallization via g-C3N4 for High-Performance Solar Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1705875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Liao, J.-F.; Wu, W.-Q.; Zhong, J.-X.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, L.; Kuang, D.-B. Enhanced efficacy of defect passivation and charge extraction for efficient perovskite photovoltaics with a small open circuit voltage loss. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 9025–9033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Li, X.; Bi, D.; Yi, C.; Décoppet, J.-D.; Luo, J.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Hagfeldt, A.; Grätzel, M. A vacuum flash-assisted solution process for high-efficiency large-area perovskite solar cells. Science 2016, 353, 58–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Liu, W.W.; Liu, Y.C.; Cui, C.Y.; Niu, S.T.; Niu, W.J.; Liu, M.C.; Liu, M.J.; Gu, B.; Zhang, L.Y.; Zhao, K.; et al. All-inorganic CsPbBr3 perovskite solar cells with enhanced efficiency by exploiting lone pair electrons via passivation of crystal boundary using carbon nitride (g-C3N4) nanosheets. Mater. Today Energy 2021, 21, 100782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhu, P.; Gu, S.; Luo, X.; Gao, Y.; Li, S.; Zhu, J.; Tan, H. Simultaneous Contact and Grain-Boundary Passivation in Planar Perovskite Solar Cells Using SnO2-KCl Composite Electron Transport Layer. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 10, 1903083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yang, Z.-L.; Zhang, Z.-Y.; Fan, W.-L.; Hu, C.-s.; Zhang, L.; Qi, J.-J. High-performance g-C3N4 added carbon-based perovskite solar cells insulated by Al2O3 layer. Sol. Energy 2019, 193, 859–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Xiong, Y.; Zhu, X.; Mei, A.; Qin, F.; Liu, S.; Zhang, S.; Jiang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Han, H. Bifunctional Al2O3 Interlayer Leads to Enhanced Open-Circuit Voltage for Hole-Conductor-Free Carbon-Based Perovskite Solar Cells. Sol. RRL 2018, 2, 1800002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Han, G.S.; Chung, H.S.; Kim, B.J.; Kim, D.H.; Lee, J.W.; Swain, B.S.; Mahmood, K.; Yoo, J.S.; Park, N.-G.; Lee, J.H.; et al. Retarding charge recombination in perovskite solar cells using ultrathin MgO-coated TiO2 nanoparticulate films. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 9160–9164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Xia, Z.; Zhang, C.; Feng, Z.; Wu, Z.; Wang, Z.; Chen, X.; Huang, S. Synergetic Effect of Plasmonic Gold Nanorods and MgO for Perovskite Solar Cells. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Rao, L.; Meng, X.; Xiao, S.; Xing, Z.; Fu, Q.; Wang, H.; Gong, C.; Hu, T.; Hu, X.; Guo, R.; et al. Wearable Tin-Based Perovskite Solar Cells Achieved by a Crystallographic Size Effect. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2021, 60, 14693–14700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Gillan, E.G. Synthesis of Nitrogen-Rich Carbon Nitride Networks from an Energetic Molecular Azide Precursor. Chem. Mater. 2000, 12, 3906–3912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sriram, B.; Baby, J.N.; Hsu, Y.F.; Wang, S.F.; George, M.; Veerakumar, P.; Lin, K.C. Electrochemical sensor-based barium zirconate on sulphur-doped graphitic carbon nitride for the simultaneous determination of nitrofurantoin (antibacterial agent) and nilutamide (anticancer drug). J. Electroanal. Chem. 2021, 901, 115782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Rakibuddin, M.; Kim, H.; Khan, M.E. Graphite-like carbon nitride (C3N4) modified N-doped LaTiO3 nanocomposite for higher visible light photocatalytic and photo-electrochemical performance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 452, 400–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Cao, W.; Lin, K.; Li, J.; Qiu, L.; Dong, Y.; Wang, J.; Xia, D.; Fan, R.; Yang, Y. Iodine-doped graphite carbon nitride for enhancing photovoltaic device performance via passivation trap states of triple cation perovskite films. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019, 7, 12717–12724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Niu, T.; Lu, J.; Munir, R.; Li, J.; Barrit, D.; Zhang, X.; Hu, H.; Yang, Z.; Amassian, A.; Zhao, K.; et al. Stable High-Performance Perovskite Solar Cells via Grain Boundary Passivation. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, e1706576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Chen, S.; Pan, Q.; Li, J.; Zhao, C.; Guo, X.; Zhao, Y.; Jiu, T. Grain boundary passivation with triazine-graphdiyne to improve perovskite solar cell performance. Sci. China Mater. 2020, 63, 2465–2476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wei, J.; Wang, X.; Sun, X.; Yang, Z.; Moreels, I.; Xu, K.; Li, H. Polymer assisted deposition of high-quality CsPbI2Br film with enhanced film thickness and stability. Nano Res. 2020, 13, 684–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zeng, J.; Bi, L.; Cheng, Y.; Xu, B.; Jen, A.K.Y. Self-assembled monolayer enabling improved buried interfaces in blade-coated perovskite solar cells for high efficiency and stability. Nano Res. Energy 2022, 1, e9120004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ye, S.; Rao, H.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, L.; Bao, H.; Sun, W.; Li, Y.; Gu, F.; Wang, J.; Liu, Z.; et al. A Breakthrough Efficiency of 19.9% Obtained in Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells by Using an Efficient Trap State Passivator Cu(thiourea)I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 7504–7512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wei, X.; Liu, X.; Liu, H.; Yang, S.; Zeng, H.; Meng, F.; Lei, X.; Liu, J. Exfoliated graphitic carbon nitride self-recognizing CH3NH3PbI3 grain boundaries by hydrogen bonding interaction for improved perovskite solar cells. Sol. Energy 2019, 181, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Kang, B.; Biswas, K. Preferential CH3NH3+ Alignment and Octahedral Tilting Affect Charge Localization in Cubic Phase CH3NH3PbI3. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 8319–8326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Hao, Q.; Jia, G.; Wei, W.; Vinu, A.; Wang, Y.; Arandiyan, H.; Ni, B.-J. Graphitic carbon nitride with different dimensionalities for energy and environmental applications. Nano Res. 2019, 13, 18–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Chen, X.; Liu, Q.; Wu, Q.; Du, P.; Zhu, J.; Dai, S.; Yang, S. Incorporating Graphitic Carbon Nitride (g-C3N4) Quantum Dots into Bulk-Heterojunction Polymer Solar Cells Leads to Efficiency Enhancement. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 1719–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Chen, J.; Dong, H.; Zhang, L.; Li, J.; Jia, F.; Jiao, B.; Xu, J.; Hou, X.; Liu, J.; Wu, Z. Graphitic carbon nitride doped SnO2 enabling efficient perovskite solar cells with PCEs exceeding 22%. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 2644–2653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Grimme, S.; Antony, J.; Ehrlich, S.; Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 154104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Wang, S.; Sakurai, T.; Wen, W.; Qi, Y. Energy Level Alignment at Interfaces in Metal Halide Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 5, 1800260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Jena, A.K.; Ishii, A.; Guo, Z.; Kamarudin, M.A.; Hayase, S.; Miyasaka, T. Cesium Acetate-Induced Interfacial Compositional Change and Graded Band Level in MAPbI3 Perovskite Solar Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 33631–33637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Singh, A.N.; Kajal, S.; Kim, J.; Jana, A.; Kim, J.Y.; Kim, K.S. Interface Engineering Driven Stabilization of Halide Perovskites against Moisture, Heat, and Light for Optoelectronic Applications. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 2000768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Liu, P.; Sun, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhang, H.; Gong, Y.; Li, F.; Shi, Y.; Du, Y.; Li, X.; Guo, S.-s.; et al. Two dimensional graphitic carbon nitride quantum dots modified perovskite solar cells and photodetectors with high performances. J. Power Sources 2020, 451, 227825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Ameri, M.; Ghaffarkani, M.; Ghahrizjani, R.T.; Safari, N.; Mohajerani, E. Phenomenological morphology design of hybrid organic-inorganic perovskite solar cell for high efficiency and less hysteresis. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2020, 205, 110251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zeng, W.; Liu, X.; Guo, X.; Niu, Q.; Yi, J.; Xia, R.; Min, Y. Morphology Analysis and Optimization: Crucial Factor Determining the Performance of Perovskite Solar Cells. Molecules 2017, 22, 520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Zheng, L.; Zhang, D.; Ma, Y.; Lu, Z.; Chen, Z.; Wang, S.; Xiao, L.; Gong, Q. Morphology control of the perovskite films for efficient solar cells. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 10582–10593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Liu, Z.; Wu, S.; Yang, X.; Zhou, Y.; Jin, J.; Sun, J.; Zhao, L.; Wang, S. The dual interfacial modification of 2D g-C3N4 for high-efficiency and stable planar perovskite solar cells. Nanoscale Adv. 2020, 2, 5396–5402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Cao, J.; Tang, G.; You, P.; Wang, T.; Zheng, F.; Zhao, J.; Yan, F. Enhanced Performance of Planar Perovskite Solar Cells Induced by Van Der Waals Epitaxial Growth of Mixed Perovskite Films on WS2 Flakes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2002358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Jin, J.; Wu, S.; Yang, X.; Zhou, Y.; Li, Z.; Cao, Q.; Chi, B.; Li, J.; Zhao, L.; Wang, S. Improve the efficiency of perovskite solar cells through the interface modification of g-C3N4 nanosheets. Mater. Lett. 2021, 304, 130685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Yang, J.; Chu, L.; Hu, R.; Liu, W.; Liu, N.; Ma, Y.; Ahmad, W.; Li, X.a. Work function engineering to enhance open-circuit voltage in planar perovskite solar cells by g-C3N4 nanosheets. Nano Res. 2021, 14, 2139–2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Yang, X.; Li, L.; Wu, J.; Hu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Russell, T.P.; Tu, Y.; Zhu, R. Optimizing Vertical Crystallization for Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells by Buried Composite Layers. Sol. RRL 2021, 5, 2100457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wang, L.; Fu, L.; Li, B.; Li, H.; Pan, L.; Chang, B.; Yin, L. Thiazole-Modified C3N4 Interfacial Layer for Defect Passivation and Charge Transport Promotion in Perovskite Solar Cells. Sol. RRL 2021, 5, 2000720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Cruz, D.; Garcia Cerrillo, J.; Kumru, B.; Li, N.; Dario Perea, J.; Schmidt, B.; Lauermann, I.; Brabec, C.J.; Antonietti, M. Influence of Thiazole-Modified Carbon Nitride Nanosheets with Feasible Electronic Properties on Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 12322–12328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 12 03625 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) g-C3N4 as an additive or interface engineering material in PSCs, (b) surface groups and properties of tri-s-triazine-based g-C3N4 (reproduced with permission [42]; copyright 2020, American Chemical Society).
Figure 1. (a) g-C3N4 as an additive or interface engineering material in PSCs, (b) surface groups and properties of tri-s-triazine-based g-C3N4 (reproduced with permission [42]; copyright 2020, American Chemical Society).
Nanomaterials 12 03625 g001
Nanomaterials 12 03625 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) The position of G–CNQD in SnO2. (b) The side view for the charge density difference of SnO2 (above) and G–SnO2 (below) with oxygen vacancy; the yellow and cyan areas indicate electron depletion and accumulation, respectively. (c) Energy band alignment of the devices (reproduced with permission [86]; copyright 2020, Royal Society of Chemistry). (d) Schematic illustration of the devices with a g–CNQD layer and a J–V curve. (e) AFM images of pristine SnO2 film and SnO2/g–CNQD films. (f) SEM images and (g) XRD spectra of perovskite films based on different ETL. The asterisks indicate the main peaks of perovskites structure (reproduced with permission [91]; copyright 2020, Elsevier).
Figure 4. (a) The position of G–CNQD in SnO2. (b) The side view for the charge density difference of SnO2 (above) and G–SnO2 (below) with oxygen vacancy; the yellow and cyan areas indicate electron depletion and accumulation, respectively. (c) Energy band alignment of the devices (reproduced with permission [86]; copyright 2020, Royal Society of Chemistry). (d) Schematic illustration of the devices with a g–CNQD layer and a J–V curve. (e) AFM images of pristine SnO2 film and SnO2/g–CNQD films. (f) SEM images and (g) XRD spectra of perovskite films based on different ETL. The asterisks indicate the main peaks of perovskites structure (reproduced with permission [91]; copyright 2020, Elsevier).
Nanomaterials 12 03625 g004
Nanomaterials 12 03625 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Schematic diagram of g–C3N4 dual–modified PSCs. (b) SEM of perovskite films (reproduced with permission [95]; copyright 2018, Royal Society of Chemistry). (c) Energy band alignment of the device. The EF level of the ETL, without and with g–C3N4, are represented with a dotted line (reproduced with permission [98]; copyright 2021, Springer Nature). (d) Schematic of the vertical carrier transportation of the perovskite films via buried manipulation (reproduced with permission [99]; copyright 2021, John Wiley and Sons). (e) Schematic illustration of the possible interface defect sites (reproduced with permission [100]; copyright 2021, John Wiley and Sons).
Figure 5. (a) Schematic diagram of g–C3N4 dual–modified PSCs. (b) SEM of perovskite films (reproduced with permission [95]; copyright 2018, Royal Society of Chemistry). (c) Energy band alignment of the device. The EF level of the ETL, without and with g–C3N4, are represented with a dotted line (reproduced with permission [98]; copyright 2021, Springer Nature). (d) Schematic of the vertical carrier transportation of the perovskite films via buried manipulation (reproduced with permission [99]; copyright 2021, John Wiley and Sons). (e) Schematic illustration of the possible interface defect sites (reproduced with permission [100]; copyright 2021, John Wiley and Sons).
Nanomaterials 12 03625 g005
Table
Table 1. Recent development of g–C3N4 based PSCs photovoltaic performance.
Table 1. Recent development of g–C3N4 based PSCs photovoltaic performance.
StructurePCE (%)Voc (V)Jsc (mA·cm−2)FF (%)Ref.Year
ITO/PTAA/NO3-g-C3N4:CsFAMAPbI3−xBrx/PCBM/BCP/Ag20.081.1122.8479.20[41]2019
FTO/c-TiO2/g-C3N4:MAPbI3/spiro-OMeTAD /MoO3/Ag19.491.0724.3174.0[63]2018
FTO/c-TiO2/g-C3N4:MAPbI3/spiro-OMeTAD /Au21.101.1623.0079.0[64]2019
FTO/c-TiO2/m-TiO2/g-C3N4:CsPbBr3/carbon8.001.2777.8080.32[66]2021
FTO/c-TiO2/m-TiO2/Al2O3/g-C3N4:MAPbI3/carbon14.341.0023.8060.1[68]2019
PDMS/hc-PEDOT:PSS/PEDOT:PSS/g-C3N4:FASnI3/C60/BCP/Ag8.560.62120.6866.68[72]2021
FTO/TiO2/G-CNI:CsFAMAPbI3−xBrx/spiro-OMeTAD/Au18.281.0722.9774.0[76]2019
FTO/c-TiO2/U-g-C3N4:MAPbI3/spiro-OMeTAD/Au15.801.1023.2062.0[82]2019
ITO/CNQDs:SnO2/CsFAMAPbI3−xBrx/Spiro-MeOTAD/Au22.131.1824.0378.3[86]2020
FTO/SnO2/CNQDs/(FA/MA/Cs)PbI3−(x+y)BrxCly/spiro-OMeTAD/Au21.231.1423.3979.6[91]2020
FTO/SnO2/g-C3N4/MAPbI3/g-C3N4/Sspiro-OMeTAD/Au19.671.1421.4580.7[95]2020
FTO/c-TiO2/m-TiO2/g-C3N4 nanosheets/MAPbI3/ Carbon11.371.0216.9166[97]2021
FTO/c-TiO2/g-C3N4/MAPbI3/spiro-OMeTAD/Ag19.551.1123.6974.0[98]2021
ITO/g-C3N4:SnO2/FA0.85MA0.11Cs0.04PbI2.67Br0.33·xPbI2/spiro-MeOTAD/Au21.541.1923.2178[99]2021
ITO/PTAA/MAPbI3/PC60BM/CMB-vTA/AZO/Ag17.151.0920.1778.03[100]2019
FTO/TiO2/thiazole-C3N4/(FAPbI3)0.875(CsPbBr3)0.125/spiro-OMeTAD/Ag19.231.1122.5077[101]2021
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, J.; Ma, Y.; Yang, J.; Liu, W.; Li, X. Recent Advances in g-C3N4 for the Application of Perovskite Solar Cells. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3625. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12203625

AMA Style

Yang J, Ma Y, Yang J, Liu W, Li X. Recent Advances in g-C3N4 for the Application of Perovskite Solar Cells. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(20):3625. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12203625

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Jian, Yuhui Ma, Jianping Yang, Wei Liu, and Xing’ao Li. 2022. "Recent Advances in g-C3N4 for the Application of Perovskite Solar Cells" Nanomaterials 12, no. 20: 3625. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12203625

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop