Next Article in Journal
Mechanical Properties and Antibacterial Effect on Mono-Strain of Streptococcus mutans of Orthodontic Cements Reinforced with Chlorhexidine-Modified Nanotubes
Next Article in Special Issue
Elaboration of Silicon Nanostructures with Vapor-Phase Silver Assisted Chemical Etching: Correlation between Structural and Optical Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Lindqvist@Nanoporous MOF-Based Catalyst for Effective Desulfurization of Fuels
Previous Article in Special Issue
Flexible Cu3(HHTP)2 MOF Membranes for Gas Sensing Application at Room Temperature
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Light-Controlled Direction of Distributed Feedback Laser Emission by Photo-Mobile Polymer Films

by
Daniele Eugenio Lucchetta
1,*,
Andrea Di Donato
2,
Oriano Francescangeli
1,
Gautam Singh
3 and
Riccardo Castagna
4,5,*
1
Dip. SIMAU, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, 60131 Ancona, Italy
2
Dip. DII, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, 60131 Ancona, Italy
3
Department of Applied Physics, Amity Institute of Applied Sciences, Amity University, Uttar Pradesh, Noida 201313, India
4
URT-CNR, Università di Camerino (UNICAM), Polo di Chimica, Via Sant’Agostino, 1, 62032 Camerino, Italy
5
CNR, Institute of Heritage Science, Via Madonna del Piano, 10, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(17), 2890; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12172890
Submission received: 11 August 2022 / Accepted: 17 August 2022 / Published: 23 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Nanomaterials for Optoelectronics)

Abstract

:
We report on the realization of Distributed Feedback (DFB) lasing by a high-resolution reflection grating integrated in a Photomobile Polymer (PMP) film. The grating is recorded in a recently developed holographic mixture basically containing halolakanes/acrylates and a fluorescent dye molecule (Rhodamine 6G). The PMP-mixture is placed around the grating spot and a subsequent curing/photo-polymerization process is promoted by UV-irradiation. Such a process brings to the simultaneous formation of the PMP-film and the covalent link of the PMP-film to the DFB-grating area (PMP-DFB system). The PMP-DFB allows lasing action when optically pumped with a nano-pulsed green laser source. Moreover, under a low-power light-irradiation the PMP-DFB bends inducing a spatial readdressing of the DFB-laser emission. This device is the first example of a light-controlled direction of a DFB laser emission. It could represent a novel disruptive optical technology in many fields of Science, making feasible the approach to free standing and light-controllable lasers.

1. Introduction

Polymer composites are widely used for fabrication of optical and photonic systems [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. In particular, they are exploited for the fabrication of holographic volume phase gratings [3,4,12,15,17,18,26,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. This class of holographic gratings represents an important platform for realizing plastic Distributed Feedback (DFB) lasers [41,42,43,44,45,46,47].
Recently, a novel class of polymers (photo-mobile polymers, PMPs) in which a mechanical motion can be induced and controlled by an external light [48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69] is emerging.
From the pioneering work of Angeloni et al. (1989, [70]), PMPs are mainly realized by using azobenzene-based liquid crystal polymers. Actually, the polymer chains are realized by azobenzene basic molecule with acrylate functions in 4, 4 [48,49,71]. In this case, the resultant of the light-induced cis-trans isomerization of the azobenzene-molecules in the system brings to a macroscopic motion of the polymer film under irradiation. Another way to realize PMPs is based on the use of polymer mixtures where multi-acrylate molecules bring to cross-linked polymer films [51]. Many papers also report about gratings recorded on PMP-films as surface relief gratings [72,73,74,75,76]. Our group has recently reported on the recording of holographic volume transmission gratings in PMP-films [50,53,77]. However, as far as we know, the recording of an efficient reflection grating in a PMP film is still not realized. Till today the recording of a high efficiency reflection volume holographic grating in PMP films is still an open challenge. Indeed, at the time of writing, a photomobile structure containing a high-resolution reflection grating does not exist. The aim of our work is to fabricate an optically pumped DFB laser whose emission direction is controlled by an external (coherent or incoherent) low-power light source. To realize such an optically controlled DFB system two requirements must be satisfied: a) the recording of a dye-doped holographic volume reflection grating; b) the inclusion of the recorded grating in the PMP film. The first requirement can be easily satisfied by using a recently developed DFB laser device [46]. The second requirement is achievable due to the presence of unreacted acrylate-groups at the edge of the grating area that are still available for a further photo-polymerization step after the grating formation. In short, we realized a haloalkane-acrylate based polymer grating capable of DFB-lasing and covalently linked to a PMP film. Such a device allows the low power light-controlled readdressing of the DFB laser emission.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

di-pentaerythritol-penta/hexa-acrylate monomer (DPHPA, refractive index n = 1.49, at 20 °C and λ = 589 nm), 1-bromo-butane (n = 1.437–1.441), 1-bromo-hexane (n = 1.448), 2,6-bornanedione (camphore-quinone, CQ), lead(IV) oxide (PbO 2 ), 1-ethenylpyrrolidin-2-one (or N-vinyl-pyrrolidinone, NVP), phenyl-bis (2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)phosphineoxide (Irg 819), 4-aminophenol (4-AP) are purchased from Merck; 9-[2-(ethoxycarbonyl)phenyl]-N-ethyl-6-(ethylamino)-2,7-dimethyl-3H-xanthen-3-iminium chloride (Rhodamine 6G) by Kodak.

2.2. Methods

Holographic Halolakanes/Acrylate-Based Mixture Preparation

The procedure involves the following four steps: (1) 69%w/w of DPHPA, 20%w/w of 1-bromo-hexane and 10% w/w of 1-bromo-butane are blended together at room temperature; (2) after that, 1% w/w of photo-initiator CQ is added; (3) the system is left under stirring for one hour until a transparent low-viscous syrup is obtained; (4) finally, 10 3 M of Rhodamine 6G is added and the mixture is left under stirring for another hour. A mixture’s droplet is placed in a sandwich made by two microscope glass slides separated by 50 μ m thick mylar spacers and irradiated in the holographic set-up at λ = 457.9 nm.

2.3. PMP Mixture Preparation

In a small bottle, 0.25 mmol PbO 2 and 1 mmol 4-AP are placed; 5 mmol of NVP are furthermore added. The reaction is left in aerobic conditions, in darkness, under magnetic stirring for seven days. After that, the precipitate is carefully removed. Separately, 1 mmol of DPHPA is blended with 0.14 mmol phenyl-bis(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl) phosphine-oxide and then is left, in darkness, for 3 h under magnetic stirring. The final PMP-mixture is obtained by mixing the components together. The system is left for 7 days under magnetic stirring in darkness and aerobic conditions, at room temperature.

2.4. Hologram Recording and Optical Characterization Set-Up

The holographic recording set-up working in reflection geometry is reported in the Supporting Information Section (Figure S1). To record the grating we used a droplet of the DFB haloalkane/acrylate based-mixture placed in the center of a sandwich cell. The entire process is monitored by a spectrometer connected to a PC (see Experimental Section and Figure S1 in Supporting Information). Two continuum s-polarized laser beams at λ w = 457.9 nm are used to write a 1D holographic grating in our sandwich-like cell. The irradiated area has a diameter d = 5 mm, and the writing power is P = 150 mW per beam. When the 1D interference pattern impinges on the holographic photo-polymerizable material, it promotes the polymerization of the illuminated areas and the phase separation between the different components of the starting mixture takes place [26,78]. The resulting high-resolution grating is a periodic distribution of inert-compound-rich domains corresponding to the dark regions of the interference pattern, and solid polymer-rich domains corresponding to the illuminated areas of the impinging light pattern. During the grating recording process, a low power incoherent white light passes through the sample and is collected by an optical fiber spectrometer. Transmission spectra are acquired and stored on a personal computer for further analyses. In this way, it is possible to detect real-time changes of the optical properties of the recorded periodic structures. In particular, the growth of the reflection peak and the amplitude related to the diffraction efficiency of the grating can be monitored each 100 ms.

2.5. Sample Preparation

PMP mixture is inserted by capillarity in the sandwich containing the recorded grating. In a few minutes, the PMP-mixture surrounds the spot containing the grating. The system is furthermore polymerized by irradiation with a UV-A lamp ( λ = 365 nm; P = 0.5 W) for 20 min to form the PMP-DFB film [79]. After that the cell is placed in the DFB-laser set-up.

2.6. Pumping Set-Up (See Figure S2 in the Supporting Information Section)

Concerning the lasing effect, a frequency-doubled Nd:YAG laser impinging at 45 with respect to the direction of the grating wave-vector K having a pulse intensity in the energy range between 77 mJ and 120 mJ ( τ = 4 ns, λ = 532 nm) is used as excitation source (See Figure S2 in the Supporting Information section). The light emitted from the grating along the K direction is collected and focused by a short-focal length lens into the entrance slit of a spectro-photometer. The grating vector is equal to K = 2 π Λ in which Λ is the grating pitch. In its reflection band the grating works as a DFB structure that provides a gain sufficient to observe light amplification along the optical path [46]. If the light emitted by the excited dye molecules is resonantly amplified the lasing action is feasible. When lasing occurs, the onset of a narrow peak in the emission spectrum is expected at a wavelength corresponding to one of the two edges of the Photonic Band-Gap (PBG) [45]. The Rhodamine 6G dye is chosen because at the wavelength λ = 457.9 nm its absorption band does not significantly overlap the absorption band of the used photo-initiators [45].

3. Results and Discussion

The central idea of the present work resides in the realization of a DFB laser based on a dye-doped holographic reflection grating embedded in a PMP film. The direct recording of a reflection high resolution hologram in a PMP film, at present, is not possible. This is due to the nature of the PMP material and to the geometrical configuration used. A large amount of the impinging radiation is indeed reflected by the microscope slide glasses forming the sandwich cell (see Section 2). The remaining part of the impinging light is transmitted through the sample. This fraction of light is partially absorbed and induces a symmetric flow of the photo-phobic part of the mixture towards the center of the cell, making impossible the formation of the polymer walls of the grating. On the contrary, we succeeded in writing high resolution transmission gratings, directly in PMP films [50,52,53,77]. Our approach overcomes these limits, by introducing a recently developed mixture suitable for DFB-laser fabrication [46]. In this work, we used a haloalkane/acryate-based mixture that is easy and fast to prepare and shows high transparency once polymerized. Other holographic mixtures based on HPLCs [45] or TPMTGE/Acrylate [39,80] can be also suitable for the same purpose, but require a much longer preparation time. A typical experimental result concerning the recording process is shown in Figure 1. The figure reports a transmission spectrum acquired at the end of the grating formation. The measurement is normalized to the value of sample transmission spectrum before the laser irradiation. The depth of the reflection peak gives a measure of the grating diffraction efficiency which reaches values near to 30% when the sample is properly positioned. The final peak position (nm) reflects the modifications of the grating pitch Λ , due to the polymer shrinkage [81,82]. Once chosen the writing wavelength ( λ = 457.9 nm for our mixture), the final peak position depends on the angle between the two s-polarized polymerizing beams. By varying this angle, it is possible to change the grating pitch and therefore the reflected wavelength. In our experimental conditions, the emission band of the dye-doped mixture containing the Rhodamine 6G ranges from 560 to 580 nm. For this reason, we decided to record a reflection peak centered at ≈570 nm. This explains the typical iridescence of the DFB structure clearly visible in Figure 2 as a green circular spot recorded in the center of the sample. After the recording process, the grating is linked to the PMP film through a further photo-polymerization process at λ = 365 nm and P = 0.5 W, see Sample preparation section and Figure S3 Supporting Information. Acting this way, at the same time we have the formation of the PMP-film and its link to the grating border. The PMP-film containing the grating is now ready to be peeled-off from the glass substrate and bent in a free standing configuration by using an external low-power light source [50,51,52,53,79] (see Figure S2 in the Supporting Information). At this stage the PMP-DFB film can be irradiated by an external pulsed laser that induces lasing at the edge of the photonic band-gap [46]. Figure 3 shows the laser emission under pulsed irradiation at λ = 532 nm. The pumping energy is P = 120 mJ for the free standing unaltered PMP-DFB film. As reference a 10X magnification of the emission band of the mixture below the laser threshold is shown in red. The corresponding measured laser threshold is reported in Figure 4 together with the behavior of the FWHM. The dashed linear regression gives a measure of the lasing threshold that is ≈88 mJ. In the inset of the same figure, it is reported the behaviour of the FWHM as function of the pumping energy. A reduction from tens of nanometer to ≈1 nm is observed above the threshold value of 88 mJ. To bend the PMP-DFB film an external continuous incoherent UV light at ( λ = 356 nm; P = 0.5 W) is used. The PMP-DFB bends and the pulsed pumping process at λ = 532 nm is repeated. In this situation, the DFB laser is displaced from the collecting optical fiber detector, resulting in a lower lasing intensity (for comparison purposes, the result is shown in Figure 5 with the same scale of Figure 3). When the incoherent light is switched-off, the grating comes back to the initial position and the DFB laser measured intensity becomes maximum again.

4. Conclusions

Fabrication and characterization of a DFB laser integrated in a recently developed photo-mobile polymer film are reported. The PMP-DFB film easily bends under the action of an external incoherent low power light. This bending allows the light-induced displacement of the DFB-laser emission. This novel technology opens new perspectives in the fields of optical communications, integrated optics and opto-electronics.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano12172890/s1, Figure S1: Recording Set-up; Figure S2: Lasing Set-up; Figure S3: Chemicals

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.C. and D.E.L.; methodology, R.C. and D.E.L.; validation, R.C., D.E.L.; formal analysis, A.D.D.; investigation, R.C., D.E.L.; writing—original draft preparation, R.C., D.E.L.; writing—review and editing, R.C., D.E.L., A.D.D., G.S.; supervision, G.S., O.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

R.C. thanks MARLIC—POR Marche FESR 2014–2020.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

R.C. thanks “Marche Applied Research Laboratory for Innovative Composites” (MARLIC) financed by Regione Marche in the frame of POR Marche FESR 2014–2020.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Trentler, T.J.; Boyd, J.E.; Colvin, V.L. Epoxy-photopolymer composites: Thick recording media for holographic data storage. In Proceedings of the Practical Holography XV and Holographic Materials VII, San Jose, CA, USA, 20 January 2001; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2001; Volume 4296, pp. 259–266. [Google Scholar]
  2. Li, L.; Fourkas, J.T. Multiphoton polymerization. Mater. Today 2007, 10, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Trentler, T.J.; Boyd, J.E.; Colvin, V.L. Epoxy resin- photopolymer composites for volume holography. Chem. Mater. 2000, 12, 1431–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jeong, Y.C.; Lee, S.; Park, J.K. Holographic diffraction gratings with enhanced sensitivity based on epoxy-resin photopolymers. Opt. Express 2007, 15, 1497–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Waldman, D.A.; Butler, C.J.; Raguin, D.H. CROP holographic storage media for optical data storage greater than 100 bits/um2. In Organic Holographic Materials and Applications; International Society for Optics and Photonics: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2003; Volume 5216, pp. 10–25. [Google Scholar]
  6. Waldman, D.; Li, H.; Horner, M. Volume shrinkage in slant fringe gratings of a cationic ring-opening holographic recording material. J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 1997, 41, 497–514. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lawrence, J.; O’Neill, F.; Sheridan, J. Photopolymer holographic recording material. Optik 2001, 112, 449–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Eichler, H.; Orlic, S.; Schulz, R.; Rübner, J. Holographic reflection gratings in azobenzene polymers. Opt. Lett. 2001, 26, 581–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hesselink, L.; Orlov, S.S.; Bashaw, M.C. Holographic data storage systems. Proc. IEEE 2004, 92, 1231–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. McLeod, R.R.; Daiber, A.J.; McDonald, M.E.; Robertson, T.L.; Slagle, T.; Sochava, S.L.; Hesselink, L. Microholographic multilayer optical disk data storage. Appl. Opt. 2005, 44, 3197–3207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Orlic, S.; Dietz, E.; Frohmann, S.; Mueller, C.; Schoen, R.; Trefzer, M.; Eichler, H.J. High-density multilayer recording of microgratings for optical data storage. In Organic Holographic Materials and Applications II; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2004; Volume 5521, pp. 161–173. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ramírez, M.G.; Sirvent, D.; Morales-Vidal, M.; Ortu no, M.; Martínez-Guardiola, F.J.; Francés, J.; Pascual, I. LED-cured reflection gratings stored in an acrylate-based photopolymer. Polymers 2019, 11, 632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Zheng, Z.; Yao, L.; Zhang, R.; Zou, Z.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Xuan, L. Thermo-stability of acrylate based holographic polymer dispersed liquid crystal gratings. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2009, 42, 115504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Shen, Z.; Weng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, C.; Liu, A.; Li, X. Holographic recording performance of acrylate-based photopolymer under different preparation conditions for waveguide display. Polymers 2021, 13, 936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Abbate, G.; Vita, F.; Marino, A.; Tkachenko, V.; Slussarenko, S.; Sakhno, O.; Stumpe, J. New generation of holographic gratings based on polymer-LC composites: POLICRYPS and POLIPHEM. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2006, 453, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, J.H.; Wu, F.T. Holographic gratings in photosensitive acrylic polymers with high refractive index diphenyl sulfide. J. Polym. Res. 2004, 11, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tomlin, D.; Natarajan, L.; Tondiglia, V.; Sutherland, R.; Bunning, T. Morphology of Holographic Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystal Reflection Gratings Written in Thiol-ene and Acrylate Polymer Hosts: Part I-Grating Formation. Microsc. Microanal. 2003, 9, 382–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Huang, W.; Liu, Y.; Diao, Z.; Yang, C.; Yao, L.; Ma, J.; Xuan, L. Theory and characteristics of holographic polymer dispersed liquid crystal transmission grating with scaffolding morphology. Appl. Opt. 2012, 51, 4013–4020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rippa, M.; Castagna, R.; Tkachenko, V.; Zhou, J.; Petti, L. Engineered nanopatterned substrates for high-sensitive localized surface plasmon resonance: An assay on biomacromolecules. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 5473–5478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rippa, M.; Castagna, R.; Brandi, S.; Fusco, G.; Monini, M.; Chen, D.; Zhou, J.; Zyss, J.; Petti, L. Octupolar Plasmonic Nanosensor Based on Ordered Arrays of Triangular Au Nanopillars for Selective Rotavirus Detection. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 4837–4844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhao, Y.; Peng, H.; Zhou, X.; Li, Z.; Xie, X. Interfacial AIE for Orthogonal Integration of Holographic and Fluorescent Dual-Thermosensitive Images. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, 2105903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shishova, M.; Zherdev, A.; Odinokov, S.; Venediktov, V.; Lushnikov, D.; Kim, Y. Selective Couplers Based on Multiplexed Volume Holographic Gratings for Waveguide Displays. Photonics 2021, 8, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Castagna, R.; Lucchetta, D.E.; Vita, F.; Criante, L.; Simoni, F. At a glance determination of laser light polarization state. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92, 041115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, H.; Wang, R.; Yu, D.; Luo, S.; Li, L.; Wang, W.; Song, Q. Direct light written holographic volume grating as a novel optical platform for sensing characterization of solution. Opt. Laser Technol. 2019, 109, 510–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tong, X.; Wang, G.; Yavrian, A.; Galstian, T.; Zhao, Y. Dual-Mode Switching of Diffraction Gratings Based on Azobenzene-Polymer-Stabilized Liquid Crystals. Adv. Mater. 2005, 17, 370–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bunning, T.J.; Natarajan, L.V.; Tondiglia, V.P.; Sutherland, R.L. Holographic Polymer-Dispersed Liquid Crystals (H-PDLCs). Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 2000, 30, 83–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lucchetta, D.; Vita, F.; Francescangeli, D.; Francescangeli, O.; Simoni, F. Optical measurement of flow rate in a microfluidic channel. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 2016, 20, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhao, W.; de Haan, L.T.; Broer, D.J.; Zhang, Y.; Lv, P.; Zhou, G. Photopolymerization-enforced stratification in liquid crystal materials. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2021, 114, 101365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhao, Y.; Zhao, X.; Li, M.D.; Li, Z.; Peng, H.; Xie, X. Crosstalk-Free Patterning of Cooperative-Thermoresponse Images by the Synergy of the AIEgen with the Liquid Crystal. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 10066–10072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lee, K.M.; Tondiglia, V.P.; Godman, N.P.; White, T.J.; Bunning, T.J.; McConney, M.E. Reconfigurable Reflective Colors in Holographically Patterned Liquid Crystal Gels. ACS Photonics 2020, 7, 1978–1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Castagna, R.; Lucchetta, D.E.; Rippa, M.; Xu, J.H.; Donato, A.D. Near-frequency photons Y-splitter. Appl. Mater. Today 2020, 19, 100636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shalit, A.; Lucchetta, D.; Piazza, V.; Simoni, F.; Bizzarri, R.; Castagna, R. Polarization-dependent laser-light structured directionality with polymer composite materials. Mater. Lett. 2012, 81, 232–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Vita, F.; Lucchetta, D.E.; Castagna, R.; Criante, L.; Simoni, F. Effects of resin addition on holographic polymer dispersed liquid crystals. J. Opt. Pure Appl. Opt. 2009, 11, 024021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Blanche, P.A.; Gailly, P.; Habraken, S.L.; Lemaire, P.C.; Jamar, C.A.J. Volume phase holographic gratings: Large size and high diffraction efficiency. Opt. Eng. 2004, 43, 2603–2612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dhar, L. High-performance polymer recording materials for holographic data storage. MRS Bull. 2006, 31, 324–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ramos, G.; Álvarez-Herrero, A.; Belenguer, T.; del Monte, F.; Levy, D. Shrinkage control in a photopolymerizable hybrid solgel material for holographic recording. Appl. Opt. 2004, 43, 4018–4024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Cho, Y.H.; Shin, C.W.; Kim, N.; Kim, B.K.; Kawakami, Y. High-performance transmission holographic gratings via different polymerization rates of dipentaerythritol acrylates and siloxane-containing epoxides. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 6263–6271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Castagna, R.; Lucchetta, D.; Vita, F.; Criante, L.; Greci, L.; Simoni, F. Haloalkane-based polymeric mixtures for high density optical data storage. Opt. Mater. 2008, 30, 1878–1882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Castagna, R.; Vita, F.; Lucchetta, D.E.; Criante, L.; Simoni, F. Superior-Performance Polymeric Composite Materials for High-Density Optical Data Storage. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 589–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lucchetta, D.; Spegni, P.; Di Donato, A.; Simoni, F.; Castagna, R. Hybrid surface-relief/volume one dimensional holographic gratings. Opt. Mater. 2015, 42, 366–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kneubühl, F. Theories on Distributed Feedback Lasers. In Handbook of Laser Science and Technology; Harwood Academic Publishers: Reading, UK, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  42. Fu, Y.; Zhai, T. Distributed feedback organic lasing in photonic crystals. Front. Optoelectron. 2020, 13, 18–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhai, T.; Ma, X.; Han, L.; Zhang, S.; Ge, K.; Xu, Y.; Xu, Z.; Cui, L. Self-Aligned Emission of Distributed Feedback Lasers on Optical Fiber Sidewall. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lucchetta, D.; Vita, F.; Castagna, R.; Francescangeli, O.; Simoni, F. Laser emission based on first order reflection by novel composite polymeric gratings. Photonics Nanostruct. Fundam. Appl. 2012, 10, 140–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lucchetta, D.E.; Criante, L.; Francescangeli, O.; Simoni, F. Light amplification by dye-doped holographic polymer dispersed liquid crystals. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 84, 4893–4895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lucchetta, D.E.; Di Donato, A.; Singh, G.; Castagna, R. Lasing in Haloalkanes-based polymeric mixtures. Opt. Mater. 2022, 131, 112614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lucchetta, D.; Simoni, F.; Hernandez, R.; Mazzulla, A.; Cipparrone, G. Lasing from chiral doped nematic liquid crystal droplets generated in a microfluidic device. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2017, 649, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yu, Y.; Nakano, M.; Ikeda, T. Directed bending of a polymer film by light. Nature 2003, 425, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yamada, M.; Kondo, M.; Mamiya, J.i.; Yu, Y.; Kinoshita, M.; Barrett, C.; Ikeda, T. Photomobile Polymer Materials: Towards Light-Driven Plastic Motors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4986–4988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Castagna, R.; Donato, A.D.; Strangi, G.; Lucchetta, D.E. Light controlled bending of a holographic transmission phase grating. Smart Mater. Struct. 2022, 31, 03LT02. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Castagna, R.; Nucara, L.; Simoni, F.; Greci, L.; Rippa, M.; Petti, L.; Lucchetta, D.E. An Unconventional Approach to Photomobile Composite Polymer Films. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1604800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lucchetta, D.E.; Di Donato, A.; Paturzo, M.; Singh, G.; Castagna, R. Light-Induced Dynamic Holography. Micromachines 2022, 13, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lucchetta, D.E.; Castagna, R.; Singh, G.; Riminesi, C.; Di Donato, A. Spectral, Morphological and Dynamical Analysis of a Holographic Grating Recorded in a Photo-Mobile Composite Polymer Mixture. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. He, J.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, Y. Photoinduced bending of a coumarin-containing supramolecular polymer. Soft Matter 2009, 5, 308–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kondo, M.; Matsuda, T.; Fukae, R.; Kawatsuki, N. Photoinduced Deformation of Polymer Fibers with Anthracene Side Groups. Chem. Lett. 2010, 39, 234–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kondo, M.; Takemoto, M.; Matsuda, T.; Fukae, R.; Kawatsuki, N. Preparation and Macroscopic Deformation of Liquid-Crystalline Polymer Fibers Crosslinked with Anthracene Side Chains. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2011, 550, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gao, J.; He, Y.; Liu, F.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Z.; Wang, X. Azobenzene-Containing Supramolecular Side-Chain Polymer Films for Laser-Induced Surface Relief Gratings. Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 3877–3881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kondo, M.; Takemoto, M.; Fukae, R.; Kawatsuki, N. Photomobile polymers from commercially available compounds: Photoinduced deformation of side-chain polymers containing hydrogen-bonded photoreactive compounds. Polym. J. 2012, 44, 410–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Ube, T.; Ikeda, T. Photomobile Polymer Materials with Crosslinked Liquid-Crystalline Structures: Molecular Design, Fabrication, and Functions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 10290–10299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mamiya, J.i.; Kuriyama, A.; Yokota, N.; Yamada, M.; Ikeda, T. Photomobile Polymer Materials: Photoresponsive Behavior of Cross-Linked Liquid-Crystalline Polymers with Mesomorphic Diarylethenes. Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 3174–3177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ube, T.; Takado, K.; Ikeda, T. Photomobile materials with interpenetrating polymer networks composed of liquid-crystalline and amorphous polymers. J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3, 8006–8009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ube, T.; Ikeda, T. Photomobile Polymer Materials with Complex 3D Deformation, Continuous Motions, Self-Regulation, and Enhanced Processability. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019, 7, 1900380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ikeda, T.; Ube, T. Photomobile polymer materials: From nano to macro. Mater. Today 2011, 14, 480–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. White, T.J.; Tabiryan, N.V.; Serak, S.V.; Hrozhyk, U.A.; Tondiglia, V.P.; Koerner, H.; Vaia, R.A.; Bunning, T.J. A high frequency photodriven polymer oscillator. Soft Matter 2008, 4, 1796–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. De Gennes, P. Possibilites offertes par la reticulation de polymeres en presence d’un cristal liquide. Phys. Lett. A 1969, 28, 725–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Cheng, Z.; Ma, S.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, S.; Chen, Y.; Yu, H. Photomechanical Motion of Liquid-Crystalline Fibers Bending Away from a Light Source. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 8317–8324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhang, X.; Yu, Z.; Wang, C.; Zarrouk, D.; Seo, J.W.T.; Cheng, J.C.; Buchan, A.D.; Takei, K.; Zhao, Y.; Ager, J.W.; et al. Photoactuators and motors based on carbon nanotubes with selective chirality distributions. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 2983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hu, Y.; Wu, G.; Lan, T.; Zhao, J.; Liu, Y.; Chen, W. A Graphene-Based Bimorph Structure for Design of High Performance Photoactuators. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 7867–7873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lucchetta, D.E.; Castagna, R.; Simoni, F. Light-actuated contactless macro motors exploiting Bénard–Marangoni convection. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 13574–13580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Angeloni, A.S.; Caretti, D.; Carlini, C.; Chiellini, E.; Galli, G.; Altomare, A.; Solaro, R.; Laus, M. Photochromic liquid-crystalline polymers. Main chain and side chain polymers containing azobenzene mesogens. Liq. Cryst. 1989, 4, 513–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Tsutsumi, O.; Shiono, T.; Ikeda, T.; Galli, G. Photochemical Phase Transition Behavior of Nematic Liquid Crystals with Azobenzene Moieties as Both Mesogens and Photosensitive Chromophores. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 1332–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zettsu, N.; Ogasawara, T.; Arakawa, R.; Nagano, S.; Ubukata, T.; Seki, T. Highly Photosensitive Surface Relief Gratings Formation in a Liquid Crystalline Azobenzene Polymer: New Implications for the Migration Process. Macromolecules 2007, 40, 4607–4613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Young Kim, J.; Ho Kim, T.; Kimura, T.; Fukuda, T.; Matsuda, H. Surface relief grating and liquid crystal alignment on azobenzene functionalized polymers. Opt. Mater. 2003, 21, 627–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ubukata, T.; Hara, M.; Seki, T. Photogeneration of Surface Relief Gratings in Azobenzene Polymer/Liquid Crystal Hybrid Films. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2002, 377, 173–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wyatt, P.J.M.; Bailey, J.; Nagaraj, M.; Jones, J.C. A self-healing ferroelectric liquid crystal electro-optic shutter based on vertical surface-relief grating alignment. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Kawatsuki, N.; Hasegawa, T.; Ono, H.; Tamoto, T. Formation of Polarization Gratings and Surface Relief Gratings in Photocrosslinkable Polymer Liquid Crystals by Polarization Holography. Adv. Mater. 2003, 15, 991–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Lucchetta, D.; Di Donato, A.; Singh, G.; Tombesi, A.; Castagna, R. Optically tunable diffraction efficiency by photo-mobile holographic composite polymer material. Opt. Mater. 2021, 121, 111612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sutherland, R.L.; Natarajan, L.V.; Tondiglia, V.P.; Bunning, T.J. Bragg gratings in an acrylate polymer consisting of periodic polymer-dispersed liquid-crystal planes. Chem. Mater. 1993, 5, 1533–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Castagna, R.; Rippa, M.; Simoni, F.; Villani, F.; Nenna, G.; Petti, L. Plasmonic Photomobile Polymer Films. Crystals 2020, 10, 660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Lucchetta, D.; Castagna, R.; Vita, F.; Gianni, A.; Simoni, F. Microfluidic transport of photopolymerizable species for laser source integration in lab-on-a-chip photonic devices. Photonics Nanostruct. Fundam. Appl. 2012, 10, 575–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Criante, L.; Vita, F.; Castagna, R.; Lucchetta, D.E.; Simoni, F. Characterization of Blue Sensitive Holographic Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystal for Microholographic Data Storage. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2007, 465, 203–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Criante, L.; Beev, K.; Lucchetta, D.E.; Simoni, F.; Frohmann, S.; Orlic, S. Characterization of polymeric materials for microholographic data storage. In Organic Holographic Materials and Applications III; Meerholz, K., Ed.; International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2005; Volume 5939, pp. 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Typical normalized transmission spectrum showing the normalized reflection peak after the end of the recording process.
Figure 1. Typical normalized transmission spectrum showing the normalized reflection peak after the end of the recording process.
Nanomaterials 12 02890 g001
Figure 2. The high resolution reflection grating (the green spot) embedded into the photomobile polymer (brown part).
Figure 2. The high resolution reflection grating (the green spot) embedded into the photomobile polymer (brown part).
Nanomaterials 12 02890 g002
Figure 3. Lasing from the DFB structure under pulsed pumping at λ = 532 nm, pumping energy = 120 mJ. The narrow peak on the left side is due to the pump beam. The red line represents a 10× magnification of the typical emission spectrum of our mixture when pumped at low power values.
Figure 3. Lasing from the DFB structure under pulsed pumping at λ = 532 nm, pumping energy = 120 mJ. The narrow peak on the left side is due to the pump beam. The red line represents a 10× magnification of the typical emission spectrum of our mixture when pumped at low power values.
Nanomaterials 12 02890 g003
Figure 4. Typical peak intensity as function of the pumping energy P. The inset shows the behavior of the full width at half maximum (FWHM) with increasing the pumping energy. The dashed line is a linear regression that helps the eye in finding the laser threshold.
Figure 4. Typical peak intensity as function of the pumping energy P. The inset shows the behavior of the full width at half maximum (FWHM) with increasing the pumping energy. The dashed line is a linear regression that helps the eye in finding the laser threshold.
Nanomaterials 12 02890 g004
Figure 5. Lasing from the DFB structure after the bending of the structure under pulsed pumping at λ = 532 nm, Pumping energy = 120 mJ. The narrow peak on the left side is due to the pump beam.
Figure 5. Lasing from the DFB structure after the bending of the structure under pulsed pumping at λ = 532 nm, Pumping energy = 120 mJ. The narrow peak on the left side is due to the pump beam.
Nanomaterials 12 02890 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lucchetta, D.E.; Di Donato, A.; Francescangeli, O.; Singh, G.; Castagna, R. Light-Controlled Direction of Distributed Feedback Laser Emission by Photo-Mobile Polymer Films. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2890. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12172890

AMA Style

Lucchetta DE, Di Donato A, Francescangeli O, Singh G, Castagna R. Light-Controlled Direction of Distributed Feedback Laser Emission by Photo-Mobile Polymer Films. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(17):2890. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12172890

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lucchetta, Daniele Eugenio, Andrea Di Donato, Oriano Francescangeli, Gautam Singh, and Riccardo Castagna. 2022. "Light-Controlled Direction of Distributed Feedback Laser Emission by Photo-Mobile Polymer Films" Nanomaterials 12, no. 17: 2890. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12172890

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop