Next Article in Journal
Magnetic Simulations of Core–Shell Ferromagnetic Bi-Magnetic Nanoparticles: The Influence of Antiferromagnetic Interfacial Exchange
Next Article in Special Issue
Structural Disorder and Collective Behavior of Two-Dimensional Magnetic Nanostructures
Previous Article in Journal
Single-Pixel Photon-Counting Imaging Based on Dual-Comb Interferometry
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spin-Resolved Quantum Scars in Confined Spin-Coupled Two-Dimensional Electron Gas
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 11
Issue 6
10.3390/nano11061380
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Iron Oxide Nanorings and Nanotubes for Magnetic Hyperthermia: The Problem of Intraparticle Interactions

by
Raja Das
1,2,*,
Javier Alonso Masa
3,
Vijaysankar Kalappattil
4,
Zohreh Nemati
4,
Irati Rodrigo
5,
Eneko Garaio
6,
José Ángel García
7,
Manh-Huong Phan
4 and
Hariharan Srikanth
4,*
1
Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Phenikaa University, Hanoi 12116, Vietnam
2
Phenikaa Research and Technology Institute (PRATI), A&A Green Phoenix Group, 167 Hoang Ngan, Hanoi 13313, Vietnam
3
Departamento CITIMAC, Universidad de Cantabria, 39005 Santander, Spain
4
Department of Physics, University of South Florida (USF), Tampa, FL 33620, USA
5
Departamento de Electricidad y Electrónica, Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU), 48940 Leioa, Spain
6
Departamento de Física Aplicada, Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPN), 31006 Pamplona, Spain
7
Departamento de Física, Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU), 48940 Leioa, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(6), 1380; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061380
Submission received: 28 April 2021 / Revised: 20 May 2021 / Accepted: 22 May 2021 / Published: 24 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interactions Effects in Nanoscaled Magnetic Assemblies)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Magnetic interactions can play an important role in the heating efficiency of magnetic nanoparticles. Although most of the time interparticle magnetic interactions are a dominant source, in specific cases such as multigranular nanostructures intraparticle interactions are also relevant and their effect is significant. In this work, we have prepared two different multigranular magnetic nanostructures of iron oxide, nanorings (NRs) and nanotubes (NTs), with a similar thickness but different lengths (55 nm for NRs and 470 nm for NTs). In this way, we find that the NTs present stronger intraparticle interactions than the NRs. Magnetometry and transverse susceptibility measurements show that the NTs possess a higher effective anisotropy and saturation magnetization. Despite this, the AC hysteresis loops obtained for the NRs (0–400 Oe, 300 kHz) are more squared, therefore giving rise to a higher heating efficiency (maximum specific absorption rate, SARmax = 110 W/g for the NRs and 80 W/g for the NTs at 400 Oe and 300 kHz). These results indicate that the weaker intraparticle interactions in the case of the NRs are in favor of magnetic hyperthermia in comparison with the NTs.

1. Introduction

Cancer treatment through magnetic hyperthermia relies on delivering magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) to a tumor area in order to deactivate cancer cells by locally raising the temperature while avoiding collateral damage to healthy tissues [1,2,3,4]. Since it was proposed by Gilchrist et al. in 1957 [5], the technique has progressively advanced and nowadays there are already a few clinical trials being carried out in different hospitals around the world [3,6]. In addition, in the last years, different strategies have been devised to improve the theranostic efficiency of these nano-agents such as combining magnetic hyperthermia and photothermia in magneto-plasmonic nanostructures or using magneto-mechanical actuation for further disrupting the cancer cells [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Despite a large number of advancements in the field, there are still several issues that warrant further studies such as improving the delivery efficiency of the MNPs to the tumor or optimizing the heating efficiency (i.e., the specific absorption rate, SAR) of the MNPs.
Concerning this last issue, one of the most complex problems that arises in the effort of increasing the SAR is the problem of magnetic interactions [16,17]. Interparticle magnetic interactions appear when the separation between the individual MNPs is small enough. These types of interactions tends to give rise to an undesired agglomeration of the MNPs inside the human body, which can be challenging [18,19]. The presence of these interactions has been reported to reduce the heating efficiency of the MNPs. The degradation of the SAR with increasing interparticle interactions can be, in principle, associated with the magnetic disorder and additional anisotropies introduced by magnetic interactions [20,21,22,23,24,25]. The hysteresis losses are often reduced in the agglomerated MNPs during the application of the AC field, resulting in lower SAR values in comparison with the case of the well-separated MNPs [26]. There are, nevertheless, exceptions to this rule: for example, when the interparticle magnetic interactions can be controlled so that they give rise to specific arrangements of the MNPs such as chains, it has been demonstrated that their heating efficiency can increase in comparison with the non-interacting MNPs [27,28]. However, it is not straightforward to obtain MNPs forming such arrangements.
Apart from interparticle magnetic interactions, one must also consider the presence of intraparticle magnetic interactions as has been reported in several experimental and theoretical works [29,30,31,32,33]. For example, when the MNPs are multigranular or multidomain, short-range dipolar interactions between nanograins forming part of a nanostructure can also impact their magnetic response and therefore their heating efficiency [34]. To this respect, in the last years several new magnetic nanostructures for magnetic hyperthermia have been brought forward as an alternative to the typically employed spherical single domain MNPs. Among these, we have synthesized magnetic nanodiscs, nanoflowers and core/shell MNPs, for example [35,36,37,38]. By changing the morphology of these nanostructures, we can improve their heating efficiency while exploiting new biomedical capabilities. Recent SANS experiments in multigranular nanoflowers with strong interactions between the nanograins have revealed that a comparatively large heating efficiency can be obtained in these nanostructures due to their intrinsic enhanced spin disorder [38]. Other good examples of these kinds of novel MNPs are iron oxide nanotubes and nanorings [39,40]. These nanostructures have recently been proposed as promising candidates for combined drug delivery and magnetic hyperthermia therapy: by making the particles hollow, the surface area available for attaching drug molecules to the MNPs is increased [41,42]. In addition, the tunable aspect ratio and morphology of these nanostructures provide us with an additional degree of control over their magnetic response.
To better understand the effect of intraparticle interactions in the magnetic hyperthermia response of multigranular nanostructures, in this work we focused on the study of Fe3O4 nanorings (NRs) and nanotubes (NTs). Both nanostructures present a similar wall thickness but very different lengths (55 nm for NRs and 470 nm for NTs) and different types of nanograins (elongated rods for NTs and spherical nanograins for NRs). In this way, the intraparticle interactions were modified. On the other hand, for all of the measurements, the concentration of the nanostructures was kept the same for both samples in order to “homogenize” the effect of the interparticle interactions. By using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD), we determined the composition, morphology and size of both nanostructures. In addition, magnetic measurements, zero-field-cooling/field-cooling (ZFC/FC) curves and hysteresis loops (M-H curves) provided us with a depiction of the magnetic behavior of NRs and NTs as a function of temperature (10–300 K) and magnetic field (0–5 T). These results were complemented with transverse susceptibility (TS) measurements, which revealed the differences in the effective anisotropy of both samples. Finally, AC hyperthermia measurements were carried out using a homemade setup and the SAR vs. field curves (H = 0–400 Oe, f = 300 kHz) were compared and related to the different characteristics of both samples; in particular, to the role of intraparticle interactions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Synthesis of Fe3O4 Nanotubes and Nanorings

Fe3O4 NTs and NRs were synthesized using a two-step process. First, α-Fe2O3 NTs and NRs were synthesized using a hydrothermal reaction of FeCl3 with NaH2PO4 and Na2SO4. In a typical reaction, FeCl3·6H2O (0.27 g) and Na2SO4 (0.0195 g) and NaH2PO4·2H2O 0.007 g and 0.014 g for α-Fe2O3 NTs and NRs, respectively, were dissolved in 35 mL of water. The solution was then transferred into a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave and heated to 220 °C for 8 h. The α-Fe2O3 NTs and NRs were then reduced in the presence of hydrogen/argon (7% hydrogen) at 300 °C for 5 h to form Fe3O4 NTs and NRs.

2.2. Structural Characterization

The crystal structure of the nanoparticles was characterized using a Bruker AXS D8 X-ray diffractometer (XRD) working in Bragg Brentano geometry at a Cu Kα wavelength. The morphology of the nanoparticles was analyzed using an FEI Morgagni 268 transmission electron microscope (TEM) operating at 60 kV.

2.3. Magnetic Characterization

The magnetic measurements were performed in a commercial physical property measurement system (PPMS) from Quantum Design with a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) option. All of the magnetic measurements were carried out with the samples in a powder form pressed together inside a gel capsule. The M-T curves were recorded between 5 and 350 K following the zero-field-cooling/field-cooling (ZFC/FC) protocol with an applied field of 50 Oe. On the other hand, M-H loops were measured at 300 K applying fields up to 5 T.

2.4. Magnetic Hyperthermia

The AC magnetometry experiments were carried out using a homemade setup [43] on suspensions of 1 mg/mL of NRs and NTs in water. The magnetic field amplitude was varied between 0 and 400 Oe while the frequency was fixed at 300 kHz. Afterwards, the specific absorption rate (SAR), that is, the heating power of the samples under an AC magnetic field, was obtained from the area of dynamic M vs. H hysteresis loops and the fixed frequency. The results were normalized by the mass of the magnetic material according to the saturation magnetization of the samples.

3. Results and Discussions

The morphology, composition and nanostructure of the NRs and NTs were investigated by a combination of TEM and XRD analyses. In Figure 1a,b, the representative TEM images are included for both samples. Considering the NRs and NTs as hollow cylinders, we determined the corresponding average dimensions from the TEM images as summarized in Table 1: the length, inner and outer diameters and wall thickness (see Figure S1 in the Supplementary Information for the corresponding size distributions). As indicated, both samples presented a similar wall thickness but the radius and especially the length of the NTs was much higher than the NRs. Therefore, the volume of the NTs was greater than that of the NRs. In the inset to these images, we obtained a clearer depiction of the internal nanostructure of these samples. As can be seen, the NRs seemed to consist of semispherical nanograins of around 17 nm while the NTs were composed of nanorod-like units, 70 ± 20 nm long and 7 ± 3 nm wide, bound together as we already described in [39]. The differences in the internal nanostructure of both samples can be related to the differences in the growth process: the ratio of NaH2PO4·2H2O and Na2SO4 to FeCl3·6H2O determined the morphology of the nanostructure. In our case, we fixed the concentration of FeCl3·6H2O and Na2SO4 and varied the concentration of NaH2PO4·2H2O. We found that the lower concentration of NaH2PO4·2H2O promoted the growth of the NTs and the higher concentration of NaH2PO4·2H2O promoted the growth of the NRs.
On the other hand, XRD patterns (Figure 1c) with well-defined peaks clearly revealed the crystalline nature of both samples. The position of these peaks indicated that the NRs and NTs, after the reduction process in the presence of hydrogen/argon (7% hydrogen), were mainly composed of Fe3O4 although a small amount of γ-Fe2O3 could not be discarded. The average crystallite size of Fe3O4, as calculated using the Debye–Scherrer formula, was around 17 nm for the NRs, supporting the values obtained in the TEM analysis.
To evaluate how the different nanostructures of the NRs and NTs affected their magnetic response, we first carried out a magnetic characterization both as a function of the magnetic field and temperature. In Figure 2a, we present the ZFC/FC M-T curves measured at 50 Oe between 5 and 300 K. As observed, the ZFC and FC M-T curves for the NRs and NTs followed a similar trend, presenting a high irreversibility and no sign of blocking in the range of temperatures studied. This indicated that, despite the relatively small volume of nanograins forming both samples, neither the NRs nor the NTs were in a superparamagnetic (SPM) state even at room temperature. Although we could not discard that a few of these nanograins were above the blocking temperature (supposing a wide size distribution), the high blocking temperature could be more likely related to an enhancement of the effective anisotropy of the NRs and NTs in comparison with the isolated nanograins. There are several factors that can increase the effective anisotropy including surface disorder, shape effects and, of course, magnetic interactions. Similar ZFC/FC M-T curves have been reported in the literature for interacting iron oxide based MNPs [44,45]. In this respect, it was also remarkable that the Verwey transition (the expected position of the Verwey temperature is indicated in the Figure by TV) [46,47,48], which is related to the crystal structure of Fe3O4 and typically appears as a sudden drop in the magnetization around 110–120 K, was not well-defined in these ZFC/FC M-T curves. A similar smearing of the Verwey transition in other magnetite based MNPs has been associated with the effect of non-stoichiometry, surface disorder and dipolar interactions [48,49,50,51]. We further studied the magnetic responses of the NRs and NTs by measuring the magnetization as a function of the field, the so-called M-H loops, at 300 K (Figure 3b). In this case, we observed several clear differences between the NRs and NTs. The saturation magnetization (MS) value for the NTs was around 70 emu/g while for the NRs it was lower, around 55 emu/g. Both MS values were smaller than the theoretical value expected for bulk magnetite (~92 emu/g). There could have been a presence of γ-Fe2O3 in these samples, which would reduce their MS value but as both NRs and NTs were reduced under the same conditions during the synthesis procedure, this would not explain the > 25% difference in the MS of both samples. Therefore, this decrease in MS was probably associated with size effects and a surface disorder, suggesting that these effects were more significant in the case of NRs.
If we focused on the low field region of the magnetic hysteresis (M-H) loops, as depicted in the inset to Figure 2b, we observed that both NRs and NTs presented a clear hysteresis, supporting the absence of an SPM state at room temperature. Despite the relatively small volume of the magnetic nanograins composing both samples, the absence of SPM behavior indicated that the magnetic interactions played an important role. The obtained values for the coercive field and normalized remanence were HC = 140 Oe and Mr/MS = 0.17 for the NRs while for the NTs, HC = 270 Oe and Mr/MS = 0.22. The lower coercivity for the NRs in comparison with the NTs pointed towards a lower effective anisotropy for the former. In addition, the fact that the normalized remanence in both cases was much lower than the expected value for magnetically blocked and randomly aligned MNPs (Mr/MS ~ 0.5, according to the Stoner–Wohlfarth model [52]) confirmed the important role of the magnetic interactions in our samples. Concerning this, different studies have revealed that in aggregated nanoparticles, by increasing the size of the aggregate, the effect of the intraparticle interactions becomes increasingly relevant [25,53,54,55]. Therefore, as both NRs and NTs were formed by nanograins of a similar volume (~2600 nm3) but the total volume of the NTs was nearly 15 times greater than that of the NRs, the intraparticle interactions were going to be more relevant for the NTs than for the NRs. This has an important effect in their heating efficiency as we will see later. In this respect, we compared the obtained M-H loops with those measured for the 15 nm nanospheres [56] and 65 × 6 nm nanorods [35], which had a size similar to the nanograins of the NRs and NTs, respectively (see Figure S2 in the Supplementary Information). As depicted, the M-H loops for the nanospheres and nanorods presented a nearly null coercive field (<20 Oe) and a normalized remanence (<0.05), thereby showcasing the importance of the interactions when these nanospheres and nanorods formed part of the multigranular NRs and NTs, respectively. Curiously, in both cases, the MS value of the NRs and NTs was lower than that of nanospheres and nanorods. This would support the presence of a higher magnetic disorder in these multigrain nanostructures in comparison with their nanograins, as mentioned before.
In order to get an estimation of the effective anisotropy in these samples, we carried out radio frequency (RF) transverse susceptibility (TS) measurements. The TS method is a precise tool for investigating the anisotropic magnetic properties of different magnetic systems including MNPs [57,58]. TS spectra typically display peaks at the anisotropy fields (HK) and switching fields (HS) as the DC field is swept from a positive to a negative saturation. The bipolar TS curves taken at 300 K for the NRs and NTs are depicted in Figure 3a. In both cases, two peaks could be observed indicating that the switching peaks were merged with the anisotropic peak. This resulted in a slight difference in the positive and negative HK values together with a difference in the peak height. The estimated HK values are represented as a function of the temperature in Figure 3b. The HK values at room temperature were 450 and 510 Oe for the NRs and NTs, respectively. These values were appreciably higher than those obtained for the coercive field. An increase in HK has been previously related to an increase in the strength of dipolar interactions [57]. Therefore, in our case, these results would suggest the presence of stronger intraparticle interactions for the NTs in comparison with the NRs. As shown in Figure 3b, with a decreasing temperature, these values remained more or less constant but they rapidly increased below the Verwey transition (~110 K), reaching 690 and 595 Oe below 30 K for the NTs and NRs, respectively. Therefore, even if the ZFC/FC M-T measurements of the Verwey transition were not evident, the TS measurements clearly revealed its presence. Finally, we must remark that below 30 K, the HK value remained constant, probably due to the system entering into a frozen collective magnetic state [57,59].
In addition, another parameter that could be analyzed from the TS curves was the peak height difference, ɳ. It has been previously shown that the ɳ tends to increase with an increasing interaction strength [57]. In this respect, in Figure 3c, we plotted the ɳ(T) curves for both the NRs and NTs. In the whole range of temperatures analyzed, the peak height difference (ɳ) was lower for the NRs than for the NTs, supporting once again the presence of stronger intraparticle interactions for the NTs. The thermal evolution of ɳ followed a trend similar to that of HK vs. T. The maxima in the ɳ(T) curves marked the Verwey transition (~110 K). In addition, we observed that in the range of temperatures studied, ɳ calculated from a positive and a negative saturation showed a difference, which could be due to the dynamic state of the system (Figure S3 in the Supplementary Information). The difference in ɳ from the positive and the negative saturation was higher in the NRs compared with the NTs. This was also observed in the difference between the ZFC and FC magnetization curves.
In Figure 3d, we represented the thermal evolution of the maximum change in TS (ΔχT/χT)max curves. This parameter, which was sensitive to changes in the dynamic state of the system, showed a similar behavior at a low temperature with a decrease below ~100 K ascribed to the Verwey transition of Fe3O4. However, we observed several differences at higher temperatures with a sudden increase in the (ΔχT/χT)max above 200 K for the NRs and 250 K for the NTs. This could be related to the thermal disorder overcoming the magnetic order with an increasing temperature [57]. The fact that this happened at lower temperatures for the NRs than for the NTs supported the weaker effective anisotropy of the NRs in comparison with the NTs.
Therefore, the magnetic measurements indicated that both NRs and NTs presented a similar magnetic behavior with the expected structurally-coupled magnetic transitions intrinsic to Fe3O4 but there were a few quantitative differences related to the higher effective anisotropy of the NTs, which could be attributed to the stronger role of intraparticle interactions in these samples. In order to ascertain how these differences affected their efficiency as magnetic hyperthermia mediators, we carried out AC magnetometry measurements in these samples and obtained their SAR vs. H curves. The AC magnetometry measurements allowed us to gain an insight into the differences of the hysteresis losses and, hence, the heating efficiency obtained for both samples. In addition, AC hysteresis loops can allow us to better understand the nature and origin of the magnetic interactions [25].
We have represented the AC hysteresis loops for the NRs and NTs in Figure 4a,b. As depicted, in both cases, for fields up to 400 Oe we obtained minor loops with a maximum magnetization (≈15 emu/g), far from the MS values reached in the DC magnetic measurements. The fact that even at 400 Oe we obtained narrow minor loops made sense considering the high anisotropy field values exhibited near room temperature by both NRs (HK = 450 Oe) and NTs (HK = 510 Oe). As has been described in the literature, we could distinguish two regimes in the heating efficiency of MNPs under AC magnetic fields: at low fields, H << HK, the power absorption is mainly caused by viscous losses in the system and this regime is characterized by small hysteresis loop areas [17,60]. On the other hand, at higher fields, H >> HK, hysteresis losses dominate and the area of the hysteresis loops appreciably increases, eventually tending to saturate. In our case, in the range of AC fields applied, we were mainly working in the first regime. There were, nevertheless, several differences in the shape of the AC hysteresis loops for both samples with those of the NTs being slightly narrower and less squared. This could be related to the effect of intraparticle interactions: in the NTs, intraparticle interactions played a more important role than in the NRs and this gave rise to stronger demagnetizing effects that made the AC hysteresis loops narrower, as has been reported before [17,25,61].
As depicted in Figure 4c, we plotted the SAR vs. H curves computed from the area of the AC hysteresis loops [62]. Below 200 Oe, both NRs and NTs presented a negligible heating efficiency but above 200 Oe, the SAR values tended to increase; more rapidly for the NRs than for the NTs, reaching a maximum value of ~110 and 80 W/g, respectively, at 400 Oe. The obtained SAR values were smaller than those reported for other similar hollow nanostructures, e.g., Dias et al. [41] reported SAR values up to 426 W/g for magnetite NRs measured at 200 Oe and 300 kHz. Nevertheless, as depicted, the SAR vs. field curves were still far from saturation and, therefore, the SAR values could keep rising by increasing the applied field but this could pose a risk for the safety of the patient [18]. The current clinical safety limits indicate that the product of the field amplitude × frequency ≤ 5 × 109 Am−1s−1 [63]. This implies that for a frequency of 300 kHz, as in our case, the maximum applied field should not be higher than 208 Oe. In this range, the NRs still provided a better heating efficiency than the NTs although in both cases the SAR values were very small. Therefore, these results indicated that at low fields, H << HK, the MNPs with a lower effective anisotropy performed better as heating agents than those with a higher effective anisotropy [25].
The effect of the intraparticle interactions in the heating efficiency of NRs and NTs could be even better visualized if we compared the AC hysteresis loops and the SAR vs. H curves of the NRs and NTs with those measured for MNPs very similar to their corresponding nanograins: 15 nm nanospheres (see [56]) and 65 × 6 nm nanorods (see [35]), respectively. As depicted in Figure S4 (see Supplementary Information), the AC hysteresis loops for both nanorods and nanospheres were more squared and saturated than those obtained for the NRs and NTs. The differences were especially remarkable in the case of the nanorods. This could also be observed in the SAR vs. H curves: the SAR values measured for the nanorods and nanospheres were higher than those obtained for the NTs and NRs for all of the fields analyzed. The nanorods and nanospheres reached a maximum SAR value of 300 W/g and 140 W/g, respectively, at 400 Oe and 300 kHz. These values were 2.7 and 1.7 times higher than those obtained for the NTs and NRs, respectively. The higher difference between the SAR values of the NTs and nanorods indicated the higher impact of the intraparticle interactions in the NTs compared with the NRs.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we showed that intraparticle magnetic interactions can play a crucial role in the heating efficiency of multigranular nanostructures. When the nanograins bind together to form this kind of nanostructure, the strength of the intraparticle interactions increases with the increasing volume. As we have seen in the case of NRs and NTs, this gives rise to an increase in the effective anisotropy of the nanostructures in comparison with the isolated nanograins, which tends to make them become magnetically blocked at the range of temperatures relevant for magnetic hyperthermia. These blocked magnetic nanostructures present high anisotropy fields at room temperature (450 Oe for NRs and 510 Oe for NTs), which deter their heating efficiency. This was precisely observed in the AC hyperthermia measurements carried out. In the range of fields analyzed (0–400 Oe), both NRs and NTs gave rise to minor loop hysteresis losses and therefore lower SAR values (110 W/g for NRs and 80 W/g for NTs) especially when compared with the isolated nanograins, which reached SAR values up to three times higher.
These results indicate that in the range of field amplitudes and frequencies currently relevant for clinical hyperthermia, multigranular nanostructures with a lower volume and therefore weaker intraparticle interactions are preferred as heating mediators. Therefore, in our case, multigranular NRs, despite their lower effective anisotropy and saturation magnetization, present a better heating efficiency compared with the NTs.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano11061380/s1, Figure S1: The size distribution histograms for (a–c) NRs and (d–f) NTs, Figure S2: TEM images and size distributions of 15 nm nanospheres (a,b) and 65×6 nm nanorods (d–f). In addition, the M-H loops measured at 300 K for the nanospheres (c) and the nanorods (g) are also included. The insets are a zoom-in of the low field region of these M-H loops., Figure S3: Peak height difference (ɳ) curves calculated from positive and negative saturation magnetization (Msat) for NRs and NTs., Figure S4: (a) AC loops and (b) SAR vs H curves for NTs, NRs, and 15 nm nanospheres and 65 × 6 nm nanorods, similar to the constituent nanograins.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.D. and J.A.M.; methodology, R.D., V.K., Z.N., I.R., E.G. and J.Á.G.; validation, R.D. and J.A.M.; formal analysis, R.D. and J.A.M.; investigation, R.D.; resources, E.G., J.Á.G., M.-H.P. and H.S.; data curation, R.D. and J.A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, R.D. and J.A.M.; writing—review and editing, V.K., Z.N., I.R., E.G., J.Á.G., M.-H.P. and H.S.; supervision, R.D., M.-H.P. and H.S.; project administration, M.-H.P. and H.S.; funding acquisition, R.D., J.A.M., M.-H.P. and H.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED), grant number 103.02-2019.314. The Spanish Government is acknowledged for the “Nanotechnology in translational hyperthermia (HIPERNANO)” research network (RED2018-102626-T) and for funding under the project number MAT2017-83631-C3. Research at USF was supported by US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Science and Engineering, Award No. DE-FG02-07ER46438. Basque Government is also acknowledged for funding under the project number IT-1005-16 and for the postdoctoral fellowship POS_2020_1_0028.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This research is funded by the Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) under grant number 103.02-2019.314. The Spanish Government is acknowledged for the “Nanotechnology in translational hyperthermia (HIPERNANO)” research network (RED2018-102626-T) and for funding under the project number MAT2017-83631-C3. Research at USF was supported by US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Science and Engineering under Award No. DE-FG02-07ER46438. Basque Government is also acknowledged for funding under the project number IT-1005-16 and for the postdoctoral fellowship POS_2020_1_0028.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Perigo, E.A.; Hemery, G.; Sandre, O.; Ortega, D.; Garaio, E.; Plazaola, F.; Teran, F.J. Fundamentals and advances in magnetic hyperthermia. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2015, 2, 041302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Ortega Ponce, D.; Pankhurst, Q. Magnetic Hyperthermia. In Nanoscience; O’Brien, P., Ed.; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2012; pp. 60–88. [Google Scholar]
  3. Blanco-Andujar, C.; Teran, F.; Ortega, D. Current outlook and perspectives on nanoparticle-mediated magnetic hyperthermia. In Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 197–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pankhurst, Q.; Jones, S.; Dobson, J. Applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine: The story so far. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2016, 49, 501002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gilchrist, R.K.; Medal, R.; Shorey, W.D.; Hanselman, R.C.; Parrott, J.C.; Taylor, C.B. Selective inductive heating of lymph nodes. Ann. Surg. 1957, 146, 596–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Etemadi, H.; Plieger, P.G. Magnetic fluid hyperthermia based on magnetic nanoparticles: Physical characteristics, historical perspective, clinical trials, technological challenges, and recent advances. Adv. Ther. 2020, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Golovin, Y.I.; Gribanovsky, S.L.; Golovin, D.Y.; Klyachko, N.L.; Majouga, A.G.; Master, M.; Sokolsky, M.; Kabanov, A.V. Towards nanomedicines of the future: Remote magneto-mechanical actuation of nanomedicines by alternating magnetic fields. J. Control. Release 2015, 219, 43–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Cazares-Cortes, E.; Cabana, S.; Boitard, C.; Nehlig, E.; Griffete, N.; Fresnais, J.; Wilhelm, C.; Abou-Hassan, A.; Ménager, C. Recent insights in magnetic hyperthermia: From the “hot-spot” effect for local delivery to combined magneto-photo-thermia using magneto-plasmonic hybrids. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2019, 138, 233–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Das, R.; Rinaldi-Montes, N.; Alonso, J.; Amghouz, Z.; Garaio, E.; García, J.A.; Gorria, P.; Blanco, J.; Phan, M.; Srikanth, H. Boosted hyperthermia therapy by combined AC magnetic and photothermal exposures in Ag/Fe3O4 nanoflowers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 25162–25169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lavorato, G.C.; Das, R.; Masa, J.A.; Phan, M.-H.; Srikanth, H. Hybrid magnetic nanoparticles as efficient nanoheaters in biomedical applications. Nanoscale Adv. 2021, 3, 867–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nemati, Z.; Um, J.; Kouhpanji, M.R.Z.; Zhou, F.; Gage, T.; Shore, D.; Makielski, K.; Donnelly, A.; Alonso, J. Magnetic isolation of cancer-derived exosomes using fe/au magnetic nanowires. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 2058–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nemati, Z.; Kouhpanji, M.R.Z.; Zhou, F.; Das, R.; Makielski, K.; Um, J.; Phan, M.-H.; Muela, A.; Fdez-Gubieda, M.L.; Franklin, R.R.; et al. Isolation of cancer-derived exosomes using a variety of magnetic nanostructures: From Fe3O4 nanoparticles to Ni nanowires. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Curcio, A.; Silva, A.K.A.; Cabana, S.; Espinosa, A.; Baptiste, B.; Menguy, N.; Wilhelm, C.; Abou-Hassan, A. Iron oxide nanoflowers @ CuS hybrids for cancer tri-therapy: Interplay of photothermal therapy, magnetic hyperthermia and photodynamic therapy. Theranostics 2019, 9, 1288–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fdez-Gubieda, M.L.; Alonso, J.; García-Prieto, A.; García-Arribas, A.; Barquín, L.F.; Muela, A. Magnetotactic bacteria for cancer therapy. J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 128, 070902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rubia-Rodríguez, I.; Santana-Otero, A.; Spassov, S.; Tombácz, E.; Johansson, C.; De La Presa, P.; Teran, F.; Morales, M.D.P.; Veintemillas-Verdaguer, S.; Thanh, N.; et al. Whither magnetic hyperthermia? A tentative roadmap. Materials 2021, 14, 706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Mehdaoui, B.; Tan, R.P.; Meffre, A.; Carrey, J.; Lachaize, S.; Chaudret, B.; Respaud, M. Increase of magnetic hyperthermia efficiency due to dipolar interactions in low-anisotropy magnetic nanoparticles: Theoretical and experimental results. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Conde-Leboran, I.; Baldomir, D.; Martinez-Boubeta, C.; Chubykalo-Fesenko, O.; Morales, M.D.P.; Salas, G.; Cabrera, D.; Camarero, J.; Teran, F.J.; Serantes, D. A single picture explains diversity of hyperthermia response of magnetic nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 15698–15706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Thanh, N.T.K. Clinical Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles: Design to Diagnosis Manufacturing to Medicine; CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group: New York, NY, USA, 2018; ISBN 9781315168258. [Google Scholar]
  19. Bruinink, A.; Wang, J.; Wick, P. Effect of particle agglomeration in nanotoxicology. Arch. Toxicol. 2015, 89, 659–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zubarev, A.; Iskakova, L.; Safronov, A.; Krekhno, R.; Kuznetzov, D.; Beketov, I. Positive feedback of interparticle interaction on magnetic hyperthermia. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019, 489, 165402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Usov, N.A.; Serebryakova, O.N.; Tarasov, V.P. Interaction effects in assembly of magnetic nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tan, R.P.; Carrey, J.; Respaud, M. Magnetic hyperthermia properties of nanoparticles inside lysosomes using kinetic Monte Carlo simulations: Influence of key parameters and dipolar interactions, and evidence for strong spatial variation of heating power. Phys. Rev. B 2014, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Branquinho, L.C.; Carrião, M.S.; Costa, A.S.; Zufelato, N.; Sousa, M.H.; Miotto, R.; Ivkov, R.; Bakuzis, A.F. Effect of magnetic dipolar interactions on nanoparticle heating efficiency: Implications for cancer hyperthermia. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, srep02887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Fu, R.; Yan, Y.; Roberts, C.; Liu, Z.; Chen, Y. The role of dipole interactions in hyperthermia heating colloidal clusters of densely-packed superparamagnetic nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ovejero, J.G.; Cabrera, D.; Carrey, J.; Valdivielso, T.; Salas, G.; Teran, F.J. Effects of inter- and intra-aggregate magnetic dipolar interactions on the magnetic heating efficiency of iron oxide nanoparticles. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 10954–10963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Andreu, I.; Natividad, E.; Solozábal, L.; Roubeau, O. Nano-objects for addressing the control of nanoparticle arrangement and performance in magnetic hyperthermia. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 1408–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Martínez, F.P.; Simeonidis, K.; Makridis, A.; Angelakeris, M.; Iglesias, O.; Guardia, P.; Cabot, A.; Yedra, L.; Estradé, S.; Peiró, F.; et al. Learning from nature to improve the heat generation of iron-oxide nanoparticles for magnetic hyperthermia applications. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, srep01652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Gandia, D.; Gandarias, L.; Rodrigo, I.; Robles-García, J.; Das, R.; Garaio, E.; García, J.; Phan, M.; Srikanth, H.; Orue, I.; et al. Magnetic hyperthermia: Unlocking the potential of magnetotactic bacteria as magnetic hyperthermia agents (Small 41/2019). Small 2019, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bender, P.; Fock, J.; Hansen, M.F.; Bogart, L.K.; Southern, P.; Ludwig, F.; Wiekhorst, F.; Szczerba, W.; Zeng, L.J.; Heinke, D.; et al. Influence of clustering on the magnetic properties and hyperthermia performance of iron oxide nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 2018, 29, 425705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Obaidat, I.M.; Issa, B.; Haik, Y. Magnetic properties of magnetic nanoparticles for efficient hyperthermia. Nanomaterials 2015, 5, 63–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Boekelheide, Z.; Miller, J.T.; Grüttner, C.; Dennis, C.L. The effects of intraparticle structure and interparticle interactions on the magnetic hysteresis loop of magnetic nanoparticles. J. Appl. Phys. 2019, 126, 043903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Usov, N.A.; Nesmeyanov, M.S. Multi-domain structures in spheroidal Co nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shankar, A.; Safronov, A.P.; Mikhnevich, E.A.; Beketov, I.V. Multidomain iron nanoparticles for the preparation of polyacrylamide ferrogels. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2017, 431, 134–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dutz, S. Are magnetic multicore nanoparticles promising candidates for biomedical applications? IEEE Trans. Magn. 2016, 52, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Das, R.; Alonso, J.; Porshokouh, Z.N.; Kalappattil, V.; Torres, D.; Phan, M.-H.; Garaio, E.; García, J.; Llamazares, J.L.S.; Srikanth, H. Tunable high aspect ratio iron oxide nanorods for enhanced hyperthermia. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 10086–10093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Simeonidis, K.; Martinez-Boubeta, C.; Serantes, D.; Ruta, S.; Chubykalo-Fesenko, O.; Chantrell, R.; Oró-Solé, J.; Balcells, L.; Kamzin, A.S.; Nazipov, R.; et al. Controlling magnetization reversal and hyperthermia efficiency in core–shell iron–iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles by tuning the interphase coupling. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 4465–4476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Nemati, Z.; Salili, S.; Alonso, J.; Ataie, A.; Das, R.; Phan, M.; Srikanth, H. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanodiscs for hyperthermia therapy: Does size matter? J. Alloy. Compd. 2017, 714, 709–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bender, P.; Fock, J.; Frandsen, C.; Hansen, M.F.; Balceris, C.; Ludwig, F.; Posth, O.; Wetterskog, E.; Bogart, L.K.; Southern, P.; et al. Relating magnetic properties and high hyperthermia performance of iron oxide nanoflowers. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 3068–3077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Das, R.; Cardarelli, J.A.; Phan, M.-H.; Srikanth, H. Magnetically tunable iron oxide nanotubes for multifunctional biomedical applications. J. Alloy. Compd. 2019, 789, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Das, R.; Witanachchi, C.; Nemati, Z.; Kalappattil, V.; Rodrigo, I.; García, J.; Garaio, E.; Alonso, J.; Lam, V.D.; Le, A.-T.; et al. Magnetic vortex and hyperthermia suppression in multigrain iron oxide nanorings. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Dias, C.S.B.; Hanchuk, T.D.M.; Wender, H.; Shigeyosi, W.T.; Kobarg, J.; Rossi, A.L.; Tanaka, M.N.; Cardoso, M.B.; Garcia, F. Shape tailored magnetic nanorings for intracellular hyperthermia cancer therapy. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 14843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Chen, X.; Klingeler, R.; Kath, M.; El Gendy, A.A.; Cendrowski, K.; Kalenczuk, R.J.; Borowiak-Palen, E. Magnetic silica nanotubes: Synthesis, drug release, and feasibility for magnetic hyperthermia. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4, 2303–2309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Garaio, E.; Collantes, J.M.; Plazaola, F.; Garcia, J.A.; Castellanos-Rubio, I. A multifrequency eletromagnetic applicator with an integrated AC magnetometer for magnetic hyperthermia experiments. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2014, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lima, E.; De Biasi, E.; Mansilla, M.V.; Saleta, M.E.; Granada, M.; Troiani, H.E.; Effenberger, F.B.; Rossi, L.M.; Rechenberg, H.R.; Zysler, R.D. Heat generation in agglomerated ferrite nanoparticles in an alternating magnetic field. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2013, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kostopoulou, A.; Brintakis, K.; Vasilakaki, M.; Trohidou, K.N.; Douvalis, A.P.; Lascialfari, A.; Manna, L.; Lappas, A. Assembly-mediated interplay of dipolar interactions and surface spin disorder in colloidal maghemite nanoclusters. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 3764–3776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Walz, F. The Verwey transition—A topical review. J. Phy. Condens. Matter. 2002, 14, R285–R340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gehring, A.U.; Fischer, H.; Charilaou, M.; García-Rubio, I. Magnetic anisotropy and Verwey transition of magnetosome chains in Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense. Geophys. J. Int. 2011, 187, 1215–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Marcano, L.; García-Prieto, A.; Muñoz, D.; Barquín, L.F.; Orue, I.; Alonso, J.; Muela, A.; Fdez-Gubieda, M. Influence of the bacterial growth phase on the magnetic properties of magnetosomes synthesized by Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Gen. Subj. 2017, 1861, 1507–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Goya, G.F.; Berquo, T.S.; Fonseca, F.C.; Morales, M.D.P. Static and dynamic magnetic properties of spherical magnetite nanoparticles. J. Appl. Phys. 2003, 94, 3520–3528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Brabers, V.A.M.; Walz, F.; Kronmüller, H. Impurity effects upon the Verwey transition in magnetite. Phys. Rev. B 1998, 58, 14163–14166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Prozorov, R.; Prozorov, T.; Mallapragada, S.K.; Narasimhan, B.; Williams, T.J.; Bazylinski, D.A. Magnetic irreversibility and the Verwey transition in nanocrystalline bacterial magnetite. Phys. Rev. B 2007, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Stumpfl, E.F. Some aspects of mass spectrometry in research on steroids. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London. Ser. A Math. Phys. Sci. 1979, 293, 53–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Serantes, D.; Simeonidis, K.; Angelakeris, M.; Chubykalo-Fesenko, O.; Marciello, M.; Morales, M.D.P.; Baldomir, D.; Martinez-Boubeta, C. Multiplying magnetic hyperthermia response by nanoparticle assembling. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 5927–5934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Pyanzina, E.; Gudkova, A.; Donaldson, J.; Kantorovich, S. Cluster analysis in systems of magnetic spheres and cubes. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2017, 431, 201–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Urtizberea, A.; Natividad, E.; Arizaga, A.; Castro, M.; Mediano, A. Specific absorption rates and magnetic properties of ferrofluids with interaction effects at low concentrations. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 4916–4922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Nemati, Z.; Alonso, J.; Rodrigo, I.; Das, R.; Garaio, E.; García, J.; Orue, I.; Phan, M.-H.; Srikanth, H. Improving the heating efficiency of iron oxide nanoparticles by tuning their shape and size. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 2367–2381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Poddar, P.; Morales, M.B.; Frey, N.A.; Morrison, S.A.; Carpenter, E.E.; Srikanth, H. Transverse susceptibility study of the effect of varying dipolar interactions on anisotropy peaks in a three-dimensional assembly of soft ferrite nanoparticles. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 104, 63901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Poddar, P.; Wilson, J.L.; Srikanth, H.; Farrell, D.F.; Majetich, S.A. In-plane and out-of-plane transverse susceptibility in close-packed arrays of monodisperse Fe nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. B 2003, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Fdez-Gubieda, M.L.; Alonso Masa, J.; Fernández Barquín, L.; Masa, J.A.; Barquín, L.F. Collective magnetic behaviors in interacting magnetic nanoparticles. In Nanoparticles Featuring Electromagnetic Properties: From Science to Engineering; Chiolerio, A., Allia, P., Eds.; Research Signpost: Kerala, India, 2012; pp. 167–200. ISBN 978-81-308-0480-4. [Google Scholar]
  60. Usov, N.; Liubimov, B.Y. Dynamics of magnetic nanoparticle in a viscous liquid: Application to magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 112, 23901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Abenojar, E.C.; Wickramasinghe, S.; Bas-Concepcion, J.; Samia, A.C.S. Structural effects on the magnetic hyperthermia properties of iron oxide nanoparticles. Prog. Nat. Sci. 2016, 26, 440–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Hysteresis in Magnetism, 1st ed.; Bertotti, G. (Ed.) Elsevier: San Diego, CA, USA, 1998; ISBN 9780120932702. [Google Scholar]
  63. Hergt, R.; Dutz, S.; Zeisberger, M. Validity limits of the Néel relaxation model of magnetic nanoparticles for hyperthermia. Nanotechnology 2009, 21, 015706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 11 01380 g001 550
Figure 1. TEM images of (a) the iron oxide NRs and (b) NTs. In the insets, zoom-in images of a single NR and NT are included. (c) XRD data of the iron oxide NRs and NTs. The lower patterns with black squares correspond with the JCPDS data for bulk Fe3O4 (JCPDS No. 19-0629).
Figure 1. TEM images of (a) the iron oxide NRs and (b) NTs. In the insets, zoom-in images of a single NR and NT are included. (c) XRD data of the iron oxide NRs and NTs. The lower patterns with black squares correspond with the JCPDS data for bulk Fe3O4 (JCPDS No. 19-0629).
Nanomaterials 11 01380 g001
Nanomaterials 11 01380 g002 550
Figure 2. Magnetization measurements for the iron oxide NRs and NTs: (a) the ZFC/FC M-T curves measured at 50 Oe (the expected Verwey temperature is indicated by TV); (b) the M-H loops measured at 300 K with a zoom into the low field region (inset).
Figure 2. Magnetization measurements for the iron oxide NRs and NTs: (a) the ZFC/FC M-T curves measured at 50 Oe (the expected Verwey temperature is indicated by TV); (b) the M-H loops measured at 300 K with a zoom into the low field region (inset).
Nanomaterials 11 01380 g002
Nanomaterials 11 01380 g003 550
Figure 3. Transverse susceptibility (TS) measurements for the iron oxide NRs and NTs: (a) TS bipolar curves measured at 300 K, (b) temperature dependence of anisotropy field, HK, (the expected Verwey temperature is indicated by TV), (c) peak height difference (ɳ) and (d) maximum change in TS (ΔχT/χT)max vs. temperature curves as obtained from the peaks in the TS bipolar curves.
Figure 3. Transverse susceptibility (TS) measurements for the iron oxide NRs and NTs: (a) TS bipolar curves measured at 300 K, (b) temperature dependence of anisotropy field, HK, (the expected Verwey temperature is indicated by TV), (c) peak height difference (ɳ) and (d) maximum change in TS (ΔχT/χT)max vs. temperature curves as obtained from the peaks in the TS bipolar curves.
Nanomaterials 11 01380 g003
Nanomaterials 11 01380 g004 550
Figure 4. AC magnetometry loops obtained for (a) the iron oxide NRs and (b) NTs at 300 kHz with Hmax = 400 Oe. (c) SAR vs. H curves derived from the AC hysteresis loop area (H = 0–400 Oe, f = 300 kHz).
Figure 4. AC magnetometry loops obtained for (a) the iron oxide NRs and (b) NTs at 300 kHz with Hmax = 400 Oe. (c) SAR vs. H curves derived from the AC hysteresis loop area (H = 0–400 Oe, f = 300 kHz).
Nanomaterials 11 01380 g004
Table
Table 1. Dimensions of the iron oxide NRs and NTs. The length corresponds to the “height” of the hollow cylinder and the difference between the inner and outer diameters gives the wall thickness.
Table 1. Dimensions of the iron oxide NRs and NTs. The length corresponds to the “height” of the hollow cylinder and the difference between the inner and outer diameters gives the wall thickness.
Length (nm)Inner Diameter (nm)Outer Diameter (nm)Wall Thickness (nm)
NRs55 ± 555 ± 5110 ± 1555 ± 5
NTs470 ± 45110 ± 20170 ± 2055 ± 5
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Das, R.; Masa, J.A.; Kalappattil, V.; Nemati, Z.; Rodrigo, I.; Garaio, E.; García, J.Á.; Phan, M.-H.; Srikanth, H. Iron Oxide Nanorings and Nanotubes for Magnetic Hyperthermia: The Problem of Intraparticle Interactions. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1380. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061380

AMA Style

Das R, Masa JA, Kalappattil V, Nemati Z, Rodrigo I, Garaio E, García JÁ, Phan M-H, Srikanth H. Iron Oxide Nanorings and Nanotubes for Magnetic Hyperthermia: The Problem of Intraparticle Interactions. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11(6):1380. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061380

Chicago/Turabian Style

Das, Raja, Javier Alonso Masa, Vijaysankar Kalappattil, Zohreh Nemati, Irati Rodrigo, Eneko Garaio, José Ángel García, Manh-Huong Phan, and Hariharan Srikanth. 2021. "Iron Oxide Nanorings and Nanotubes for Magnetic Hyperthermia: The Problem of Intraparticle Interactions" Nanomaterials 11, no. 6: 1380. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061380

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop