Next Article in Journal
Cytotoxic Effect of Graphene Oxide Nanoribbons on Escherichia coli
Next Article in Special Issue
Globular Aggregates Stemming from the Self-Assembly of an Amphiphilic N-Annulated Perylene Bisimide in Aqueous Media
Previous Article in Journal
Hydrous Hydrazine Decomposition for Hydrogen Production Using of Ir/CeO2: Effect of Reaction Parameters on the Activity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biogenic Selenium Nanoparticles: A Fine Characterization to Unveil Their Thermodynamic Stability
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 11
Issue 5
10.3390/nano11051338
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis of Mesoporous Silica Coated Gold Nanorods Loaded with Methylene Blue and Its Potentials in Antibacterial Applications

by
Adrián Fernández-Lodeiro
1,2,
Jamila Djafari
1,2,
Javier Fernández-Lodeiro
1,2,*,
Maria Paula Duarte
3,
Elisabete Muchagato Mauricio
4,
José Luis Capelo-Martínez
1,2 and
Carlos Lodeiro
1,2,*
1
BIOSCOPE Research Group, LAQV-REQUIMTE, Chemistry Department, NOVA School of Science and Technology, FCT NOVA, NOVA University Lisbon, 2829-516 Lisbon, Portugal
2
PROTEOMASS Scientific Society, Rua dos Inventores, Madam Parque, Caparica Campus, 2829-516 Almada, Portugal
3
MEtRICs/DCTB/NOVA, School of Science and Technology, NOVA University Lisbon, Caparica Campus, 2829-516 Almada, Portugal
4
CBIOS/DREAMS, Universidade Lusófona de Humanidades e Tecnologia, Campo Grande, 376, 1749-024 Lisboa, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(5), 1338; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11051338
Submission received: 5 April 2021 / Revised: 10 May 2021 / Accepted: 16 May 2021 / Published: 19 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Design, Development, and Production of Nanocarriers and Nanovehicles)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

In this work, the successful preparation and characterization of gold nanorods (AuNRs) coated with a mesoporous silica shell (AuNRs@Simes) was achieved. Conjugation with methylene blue (MB) as a model drug using ultrasound-stimulated loading has been explored for further application in light-mediated antibacterial studies. Lyophilization of this conjugated nanosystem was analyzed using trehalose (TRH) as a cryogenic protector. The obtained stable dry formulation shows potent antimicrobial activity against Gram-negative (Escherichia coli) and Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus) bacteria after a simple post-treatment irradiation method with a red laser during a short time period.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Since the pioneering works of Murphy and El-Sayed on synthesizing gold nanorods (AuNRs) using a wet chemical approach [1,2], a rising interest has been awakened in these fascinating nanostructures, mainly due to the intriguing optoelectronic properties that arise from their anisotropic nanoshape [3]. In AuNRs, two types of localized surface plasmon resonances (LSPR) are present: transversal (LSRPtrans) and longitudinal (LSRPlong), associated with the collective oscillations of conducted free electrons in the transverse and longitudinal directions of the gold rod, respectively [3,4].
The plasmon energy of the LSRPtrans is strongly linked with the aspect ratio (AR) in AuNRs—unlike gold spheres, which have similar plasmon energy within the 4–200 nm diameter range [3,4]. Consequently, in AuNRs, the LSRPtrans band can be shifted in an electromagnetic range from the middle visible to the NIR spectrum (600–1800 nm) through increases in AR [3,4].
Taking advantage of their optoelectronic properties, AuNRs can be implemented as an efficient photo-absorbing agent. Upon laser light irradiation, the efficient conversion of light into heat is achieved [5]. Such an effect can induce photothermal therapy (PTT) against cancer and trigger a release in drug-functionalized AuNRs [5,6,7]. Combined with photosensitizers (PS), they have been explored in photodynamic therapy (PDT) against cancer cells. [8,9] One of the main drawbacks of the direct use of AuNRs in biological applications is cetyltrimethylammonium bromide’s (CTAB) cytotoxicity [10,11]. In this sense, mesoporous silica can bring additional advantages. With the replacement of the CTAB bilayer with a SiO2 coating, cytotoxicity and non-specific interactions should be reduced and biological media stability should be improved. Furthermore, the mesoporous silica coating offers additional advantages, such as high pore volume and surface area, variable size, and biocompatibility. The porous nanostructured silica layer can act as molecular cargo for a drug delivery approach in medical applications [6,7,12,13].
Methylene blue (MB) is a cationic water-soluble photosensitizer (PS) that presents a high quantum yield of singlet oxygen (1O2) generation and has been considered as a photodynamic agent in different clinical applications [14,15]. MB has been used in photodynamic antimicrobial applications [16,17,18] as well as loading or grafting on silica-coated gold nanostructures (rods or pyramids), with applications in cancer cell photodynamic therapy (PDT) [9,19,20]. However, MB has the drawbacks of poor photostability and enzymatic degradation. To protect the MB against photodegradation and trigger the medium’s release upon laser irradiation, in this work, we have used an overlap with the LSRPlong band in AuNRs. It protects the MB molecules against photodegradation under the high absorption cross-section of the AuNRs [21]. Furthermore, under overlapping laser irradiation conditions with LSRPlong bands in AuNRs, an increase in the 1O2 generation has also been reported [20,21], and it is expected to improve the performance in photothermal processes [22,23].
Despite several works addressing the application of AuNR as antibacterial agents, most of them are limited to organic coatings [24,25,26,27]. However, according to our best knowledge, few works have explored the application of AuNRs@Simes nanostructures in antibacterial proposals [28].
In the present work, we present the synthesis of AuNRs coated with a mesoporous silica shell. The loading of AuNRs@Simes with MB was completed to explore its application as a photodynamic antibacterial material. The lyophilization of these conjugated nanosystems was investigated using trehalose as a cryogenic protector.
The antimicrobial properties of the obtained dry formulation, with and without red laser irradiation, have been investigated against Gram-negative (E. coli) and Gram-positive (S. aureus) bacteria. We have confirmed positive light-stimulated antimicrobial properties.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), methylene blue (MB), sodium borohydride (NaBH4), D-(+)-trehalose dihydrate and tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Hydrogen tetrachloroaurate (III) trihydrate (HAuCl4 x 3H2O), potassium bromide (KBr) and silver nitrate (AgNO3) were purchased from Alfa Aesar. L(+)-ascorbic acid was purchased from Panreac. All reagents were used without further purification. The water was ultra-pure grade (type I), obtained with a Milli-Q Simplicity system. All spectroscopy and standard chemical techniques were used to characterize all NPs. ζ-potential analysis was conducted in a MALVERN model ZS instrument (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, UK, PROTEOMASS Scientific Society, BIOSCOPE facility). Ultraviolet–visible (UV–Vis) was conducted in a Jasco-650 spectrophotometer with temperature control (JASCO International, Tokyo, Japan, PROTEOMASS Scientific Society, BIOSCOPE facility). Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy was performed using a Bruker Tensor 27 (Bruker Optik, GmbH, Berlin, Germany). Samples were prepared in KBr disks. Lyophilization was conducted in a CHRIST model Alpha 1-2 LDplus instrument (Martin Christ Gefriertrocknungsanlagen GmbH, Osterode, Germany, PROTEOMASS Scientific Society, BIOSCOPE facility). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis was performed using a TEM microscopy JEOL JEM1010 working at 100 kV to obtain low-magnification images (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan, University of Vigo, Vigo, Spain). The size of particles and dispersion histograms were calculated from TEM micrographs using the ImageJ package [29]. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis was performed using a Carl Zeiss AURIGA Crossbeam SEM-FIB microscope.

2.2. Synthesis of Gold Nanorods

Briefly, a CTAB solution (10 mL, 0.1 M) was mixed with HAuCl4 (50 µL, 0.05 M) in a water bath at 30 °C. Then, an ice-cold, freshly prepared solution of NaBH4 (0.6 mL, 0.01 M) was rapidly injected. The brownish-yellow seed solution was stirred for 30 s and left undisturbed at 30 °C. The seed solution was used within 2 to 5 h. The growth solution consisted of a mixture of CTAB (80 mL, 0.1 M), HAuCl4 (4 mL, 0.01 M), AgNO3 (360 µL, 0.01 M), H2SO4 (1.6 mL, 0.5 M) and ascorbic acid (640 µL, 0.1 M). The growth was initiated after the addition of 192 µL of seeds, and the temperature was kept at 30 °C during the whole process. After 3 h, the reaction was centrifuged three times (7000 rpm × 15 min). The pellets were redispersed in CTAB 1 mM until a final volume of 100 mL.

2.3. Preparation of AuNRs@Simes

Briefly, NaOH solution (0.1 M) was added to 50 mL of AuNRs@CTAB ((Au0) = 0.38 mM) solution [30] in a round bottom flask, to achieve a pH between 10.5–11. After 15 min of gentle stirring, 360 µL of 20% v/v TEOS in methanol was injected for six minutes (60 µL each minute). The AuNRs solution was gently stirred for 30 min and kept undisturbed for 20 h at room temperature.
After 20 h, both reactions were centrifuged (7000 rpm × 12 min), and the pellets dispersed in MeOH. Then the samples were centrifuged several times in MeOH at 6000 rpm for 12 min and finally redispersed in 10 mL of MeOH. After the first wash in MeOH, an aliquot was centrifuged repeatedly in water (denoted as AuNRs@Si-Water). The nanoparticles can be stored in MeOH, at 4 °C, which preserves all their properties for 12 months without degradation (data not shown).

2.4. Drug Loading

Before proceeding with the incubation step, the AuNRs@Simes were successively washed with Milli-Q water (7000 rpm × 12 min) to remove all the MeOH. Finally, all samples were dispersed in 10 mL of Milli-Q water. To complete the loading, 1 mL of MB water solution (0.1 mg/mL) was added drop by drop to 1 mL of purified AuNRs@Simes. The mixture was incubated under stirring for 5 min, at room temperature, before immersion in a low-frequency ultrasonic bath, at 35 kHz for 1 min under manual stirring.. Then the solution was left for 10 min undisturbed and purified through centrifugation (7000 rpm × 15 min) in MQ water until the supernatant became clear. The AuNRs@Simes-MB were taken to a final volume of 1 mL of Milli-Q water. All the supernatants were collected, and the entrapment efficiency was determined from the relation [6,31]:
%Entrapment Efficiency = (Drug added-Free “unentrapped drug”)/(Drug added) × 100

2.5. Freeze Drying of AuNRs@Simes-Drug

To the AuNRs@Simes-MB solution, a water solution of trehalose (1 mL, 30 mM) was added to a final volume of 2 mL before immersing in liquid nitrogen for 5 min. The samples were lyophilized, and a blue powder was obtained. Empty AuNRs@Simes (without the addition of the drugs) were treated equally as a control. After resuspension of the lyophilized powder, the solution was centrifuged and resuspended in Milli-Q water to remove all the sugar shells to obtain the SEM images.

2.6. Antibacterial Activity

The antimicrobial activity was assayed against E. coli ATCC8739 (Gram-negative bacteria) and S. aureus ATCC6538 (Gram-positive bacteria). Glycerol stock cultures stored at −80 °C were inoculated in Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA) (Biokar, Allone, France) and incubated overnight at 35 ± 2 °C. Subsequently, isolated colonies were transferred to a 0.85% NaCl solution. The suspension’s turbidity was adjusted to 0.5 on the McFarland scale (McFarland densitometer, Model Den-1B, Grant Instruments, England), corresponding to 1 to 2 × 108 CFU/mL [32].
Samples (AuNRs@Simes, and AuNRs@Simes-MB) were dissolved in double-distilled water (2 mg/mL). MB solutions were also prepared in double-distilled water at a concentration of 0.015 mg/mL for MB. All solutions were prepared and handled under light-restricted conditions.
The antibacterial assays were performed according to the procedure described by Pérez-Laguna and co-workers with slight modifications [33]. The bacterial suspensions (0.5 McFarland) were deposited in 96-well microplates and mixed with the same volume of the different samples under study (AuNRS@Simes, AuNRS@Simes-MB and MB) or, in the case of the control, with double-distilled water. Microplates were prepared in duplicate, with one of them kept in the dark and the other irradiated with a red laser (JD-850, max output power 200 mW, wavelength 650 ± 10 nm), and at a distance of 2.5 cm from the top of each well, for 4 min. Then, the irradiated and non-irradiated bacterial suspensions were diluted in 0.85% NaCl (from 10–1 to 10–5), cultured on TSA and incubated overnight at 35 ± 2 °C. Viable bacteria, in colony-forming units (CFUs), were determined by colony counting in TSA plates containing between 30 and 300 colonies. All experiments were carried out at least three times.

2.7. Statistics in Bacterial Samples

As the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance (Cochran, Hartley and Bartlett tests) were verified, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s test was used to identify significant differences between results. Statistical analyses were tested at the 0.05 level of probability with the software STATISTICA™ 7.0 (StatSoft Tulsa, OK, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis of Gold Nanorods

The AuNRs were synthesized according to a previously reported seed-mediated silver ion-assisted methodology, using CTAB as a template, with some minor modifications [7]. As shown in Figure 1a, the prepared sample presented two absorption bands, one weak band at ca. 518 nm and a strong band centered on ca. 656 nm assigned to the transverse (LSPRtrans) and longitudinal (LSPRlong) plasmon band, respectively. The TEM images showed a colloidal solution essentially composed of rod-shaped gold nanoparticles with a length of 42.4 ± 9.0 nm and a width of 19.2 ± 3.8 nm. With these dimensions, the AuNRs presented an aspect ratio (AR) of ≈ 2.2 (Figure 1).

3.2. Synthesis and Purification of AuNRs@Simes

The mesoporous silica coating was achieved using a modified Stöber method reported by Tracy et al. with some modifications [34]. The controlled deposition of mesoporous silica was completed using TEOS as silica precursor in a basic medium (pH ≈ 10.5–11). The presence of CTAB serves as a template to obtain mesostructured silica growth. After silica deposition, AuNRs@Simes presented a silica thickness of 20.1 ± 5.7 nm. More important, core-free silica NPs were not detected in the TEM images (see Figure 2).
To eliminate the CTAB, the AuNRs were subjected to a purification process through successive centrifugations (see experimental section). The sample’s purification using water resulted in a red-shift of the LSPR to ca. 667 nm (Figure 3a). Conversely, upon successive MeOH and then water washes, the LSPR of the colloid solution resulted in a blue-shift to 653 nm, bringing the LSPR near to that of AuNRs without silica shell (Figure 3a). This behavior has recently been conveniently explained by J. B. Tracy and co-workers. The authors attributed the blue-shift to the dissolution of CTAB molecules that remain in the template in the mesostructured silica shell [35]. The ζ-potential of the sample purified in water was positive (+7 mV). In contrast, in the opposite case, the MeOH purification showed negative values (−20 mV) (see Figure 3b).
We have investigated the chemical composition of the AuNRs@Simes after purification with water or MeOH using FT-IR spectroscopy (Figure 3c,d).
The CTAB spectra clearly showed the typical vibrational modes previously reported in the literature associated with the −CH2, −CH3 or [−N(CH3)3]+ groups that form the molecule (located between 1481–1437 and 719–730 cm−1, see Figure 3c,d) [36,37,38,39]. Deformational vibrations of adsorbed water molecules give rise to the bands located at 1634 cm−1 [40,41]. More important, the CTAB groups’ signals are only evident in the spectrum obtained from the sample purified in water (Figure 3c,d).
The blue-shift in the LSPR agreed with previous reports [35,42], while the negative z-potential, and the marked decrease in the signals produced by CTAB groups in FT-IR analysis for AuNRs@Simes purified in MeOH suggest a substantial CTAB removal.
Then, AuNRs@Simes were used to complete the loading experiments using methylene blue as a model cationic drug. The colloidal solutions were gently washed in water to remove any remaining MeOH before the conjugation.

3.3. Drug Loaded and Freeze-Drying Experiments

We further investigated the drug loading capacity, exploring the encapsulation of MB using an ultrasound-assisted technique for 15 min. The ultrasound irradiation was used to avoid the aggregation of the nanomaterials during the incubation process due to the difference in charge of the AuNRs and the MB [43]. The entrapment efficiency was calculated by analyzing the UV-Vis spectra of supernatants from the calibration curve yielding 13.6 ± 3.2% encapsulated MB. After the loading and purification process, the LSPR showed a red-shift to 668 nm (Figure 4). It can be explained by the sensitivity of the AuNRs to the medium’s refractive index, in agreement with previous reports, where the LSPR also were red-shifted after the internalization of MB [20].
To avoid the diffusion of an entrapped drug in the solution during storage periods, AuNRs@Simes-MB was subject to lyophilization, applying freeze-dry techniques. Sugars, specifically trehalose, are an excellent candidate to lyophilize pharmaceutical products due to the absence of internal hydrogen bonds, lower hygroscopicity, lower chemical reactivity, and higher glass transition temperature (Tg) [44,45,46,47]. Nanoparticles encased in high Tg amorphous carbohydrates allow us to store the products at room temperature. Trehalose was stated as the best cryoprotectant for lyophilizing mesoporous silica nanoparticles when compared with other common cryoprotectants, such as mannitol or sorbitol. The presence of trehalose can prevent aggregation and allow an easy reconstruction, maintaining the same size and polydispersity index (PDI) compared to the prior wet formulation. [48,49]
After the lyophilization process, a powder was obtained (Figure 5a). The powders facilitated easy redispersion in water without applying external inputs (Figure 5a). As revealed by UV-Vis spectra and SEM images, the optical and structural features were preserved during the lyophilization process (Figure 5b,c). They maintain their properties for at least 12 months after lyophilization and storage at room temperature.

3.4. Exploring the Application of AuNRs@Simes-MB

Bacteria can be classified into Gram-negative and Gram-positive based on their cell wall composition. Gram-positive bacteria contain a thicker peptidoglycan layer with teichoic wall acids and lipoteichoic acids covalently attached; Gram-negative bacteria have a thinner peptidoglycan layer surrounded by an outer membrane. The outer membrane is a lipid bilayer, where the inner leaflet is composed of phospholipids and the outer leaflet is composed of highly negatively charged lipopolysaccharides (LPS) [50,51]. Gram-negative bacteria tend to be more resistant to antimicrobial agents than Gram-positive bacteria because of the additional protection afforded by the outer membrane.
Based on these differences in composition and sensitivity, the antibacterial activity of the lyophilized AuNRs@Simes formulation was assayed against Gram-negative (E. coli) and Gram-positive bacteria (S. aureus) (Table 1). Neither E. coli nor S. aureus were affected by laser irradiation as no significant differences have been observed in the number of CFU/mL between irradiated and non-irradiated controls. The efficiency of AuNRs as photothermal agents strongly depends on the absorbance band’s position and the aspect ratio of the sample. In this case, the selected AuNRs with a band at 650 nm overlapping the MB show no PTT effects alone, being biocompatible even after laser irradiation. Even if the negligible result of the AuNRs alone was unexpected, it indicates an efficient protocol for the removal of the CTAB template or remaining MeOH after purification, which can produce toxicity and lead to a misinterpretation of the results [24].
Regarding AuNRs@Simes-MB and MB, the results showed that both samples’ antibacterial activity was strongly affected by the exposure to the red laser. Accordingly, after irradiation, both MB and AuNRs@Simes-MB showed a pronounced antibacterial activity (~8 log10 unit reduction) against E. coli and S. aureus. More important, MB without laser exposure reduced the number of CFU/mL of E. coli in about 2 log10 cycles, an effect that was not observed with AuNRs@Simes-MB without laser (Table 1).
We have tested the MB effect alone and in combination with trehalose, irradiated and non-irradiated with the laser. The presence of trehalose can enhance bacterial survival in the E. coli sample without laser irradiation (in about 1 log10 cycle). It can be explained as due to trehalose’s presence, which can significantly decrease the toxicity effect, as stated in other systems [52,53,54,55]. Despite this, with trehalose’s presence there is still some observed toxicity on the E. coli bacteria, toxicity which is prevented in the AuNRs@Simes-MB sample.
The results obtained suggest that E. coli has a higher sensitivity to MB than S. aureus. Positively charged photosensitizers are expected to be more effective bacterial inactivators than neutral molecules against Gram-negative bacteria, whose outer membranes are composed of negatively charged lipopolysaccharides. In contrast, Gram-positive bacteria may be inactivated more effectively by neutral or negatively charged agents [56].
According to the above, under the same experimental conditions, E. coli proved to be more sensitive to the bactericidal effects of AuNRs@Simes-MB than S. aureus (Figure 6) as a more pronounced log10 unit decrease was achieved with the same concentration of AuNRs@Simes-MB (3 and 4 log10 unit decrease with 0.5 mg/mL for S. aureus and E. coli, respectively).

4. Conclusions

We have successfully synthesized AuNRs@CTAB in an aqueous solution matching the photosensitiser absorption band. The controlled deposition of mesoporous silica coating (≈20 nm) on AuNRs was successfully realized, and an efficient removal of the cytotoxic CTAB has been performed. Conjugation with MB was obtained using ultrasound techniques in a short time period. The subsequent lyophilization in the presence of trehalose as a cryoprotection molecule was applied successfully, giving a long shelf-life to the system. We have observed that there were no appreciable changes in the optical or nanostructuration features after redispersion. The formulation (AuNRs@Simes-MB) obtained was effective against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria after laser irradiation. The lack of toxicity in the formulation system without the laser exposure, even with the presence of MB and the toxicity after the laser exposure, indicates that it can be a promising system with remote light-triggered drug delivery properties.
A full assessment of the AuNRs system should be conducted to determine their efficacy in vitro and their toxicity, compared with the more conventional photodynamic agents. This work has the potential to aid in the development of a more effective PDT for antibacterial applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.F.-L., J.F.-L. and C.L.; methodology, A.F.-L., J.F.-L., software, J.F.-L., validation, A.F.-L., J.F.-L. and J.D.; formal analysis, A.F.-L. and J.F.-L.; investigation, A.F.-L., J.F.-L., J.D., M.P.D., E.M.M. and C.L.; resources, C.L., J.L.C.-M.; data curation, A.F.-L. and J.F.-L. and C.L.; writing—original draft preparation, A.F.-L. and J.F.-L.; writing—review and editing, A.F.-L., J.F.-L., C.L. and J.L.C.-M. visualization, J.F.-L. supervision, C.L., J.F.-L. and J.L.C.-M.; project administration, C.L.; funding acquisition, C.L. and J.L.C.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We thank the financial support by the PROTEOMASS Scientific Society (Portugal) (General Funding Grant 2019–2020), as well as the Associate Laboratory Research Unit for Green Chemistry—Clean Processes and Technologies—LAQV-REQUIMTE financed by national funds from FCT/MEC (UIDB/04077/2020) and co-financed by the ERDF under the PT2020 Partnership Agreement (POCI-01-0145-FEDER—007265). J.D.; A.F.-L.; C.L.; J.F.-L. and J.L.C.-M. thanks to the FCT-MEC the research grant SiSi4Bacter (PTDC/QUI-COL/1517/2020). J.F.-L. thank FCT/MEC (Portugal) the junior researcher contract under DL57 pro-gramme. J.D. thanks the Project PTDC/QEQ-MED/2118/2014 for her researcher contract. A.F.-L. thanks the FCT-MEC Portugal for his doctoral grant associated with the Green Chemistry PhD. Program (SFRH/BD/52528/2014) and the PROTEOMASS Scientific Society Postdoctoral grant during August 2019–March 2021.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jana, N.R.; Gearheart, L.; Murphy, C.J. Wet Chemical Synthesis of High Aspect Ratio Cylindrical Gold Nanorods. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 4065–4067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nikoobakht, B.; El-Sayed, M.A. Preparation and Growth Mechanism of Gold Nanorods (NRs) Using Seed-Mediated Growth Method. Chem. Mater. 2003, 15, 1957–1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lohse, S.E.; Murphy, C.J. The Quest for Shape Control: A History of Gold Nanorod Synthesis. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 1250–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Amendola, V.; Pilot, R.; Frasconi, M.; Maragò, O.M.; Iatì, M.A. Surface Plasmon Resonance in Gold Nanoparticles: A Review. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2017, 29, 203002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Huang, X.; Jain, P.K.; El-Sayed, I.H.; El-Sayed, M.A. Plasmonic Photothermal Therapy (PPTT) Using Gold Nanoparticles. Lasers Med. Sci. 2008, 23, 217–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, J.; Detrembleur, C.; De Pauw-Gillet, M.-C.; Mornet, S.; Jérôme, C.; Duguet, E. Gold Nanorods Coated with Mesoporous Silica Shell as Drug Delivery System for Remote Near Infrared Light-Activated Release and Potential Phototherapy. Small 2015, 11, 2323–2332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, Z.; Wang, L.; Wang, J.; Jiang, X.; Li, X.; Hu, Z.; Ji, Y.; Wu, X.; Chen, C. Mesoporous Silica-Coated Gold Nanorods as a Light-Mediated Multifunctional Theranostic Platform for Cancer Treatment. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 1418–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kuo, W.-S.; Chang, C.-N.; Chang, Y.-T.; Yang, M.-H.; Chien, Y.-H.; Chen, S.-J.; Yeh, C.-S. Gold Nanorods in Photodynamic Therapy, as Hyperthermia Agents, and in Near-Infrared Optical Imaging. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 2711–2715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chu, Z.; Yin, C.; Zhang, S.; Lin, G.; Li, Q. Surface Plasmon Enhanced Drug Efficacy Using Core-Shell Au@SiO2 Nanoparticle Carrier. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 3406–3411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Alkilany, A.M.; Murphy, C.J. Toxicity and Cellular Uptake of Gold Nanoparticles: What We Have Learned so Far? J. Nanopart. Res. 2010, 12, 2313–2333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, L.; Jiang, X.; Ji, Y.; Bai, R.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, X.; Chen, C. Surface Chemistry of Gold Nanorods: Origin of Cell Membrane Damage and Cytotoxicity. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 8384–8391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Luo, G.-F.; Chen, W.-H.; Lei, Q.; Qiu, W.-X.; Liu, Y.-X.; Cheng, Y.-J.; Zhang, X.-Z. A Triple-Collaborative Strategy for High-Performance Tumor Therapy by Multifunctional Mesoporous Silica-Coated Gold Nanorods. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 4339–4350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xu, C.; Chen, F.; Valdovinos, H.F.; Jiang, D.; Goel, S.; Yu, B.; Sun, H.; Barnhart, T.E.; Moon, J.J.; Cai, W. Bacteria-like Mesoporous Silica-Coated Gold Nanorods for Positron Emission Tomography and Photoacoustic Imaging-Guided Chemo-Photothermal Combined Therapy. Biomaterials 2018, 165, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tardivo, J.P.; Del Giglio, A.; de Oliveira, C.S.; Gabrielli, D.S.; Junqueira, H.C.; Tada, D.B.; Severino, D.; de Fátima Turchiello, R.; Baptista, M.S. Methylene Blue in Photodynamic Therapy: From Basic Mechanisms to Clinical Applications. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 2005, 2, 175–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ormond, A.; Freeman, H. Dye Sensitizers for Photodynamic Therapy. Materials 2013, 6, 817–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Planas, O.; Bresolí-Obach, R.; Nos, J.; Gallavardin, T.; Ruiz-González, R.; Agut, M.; Nonell, S. Synthesis, Photophysical Characterization, and Photoinduced Antibacterial Activity of Methylene Blue-Loaded Amino- and Mannose-Targeted Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles. Molecules 2015, 20, 6284–6298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Huang, Y.-Y.; Wintner, A.; Seed, P.C.; Brauns, T.; Gelfand, J.A.; Hamblin, M.R. Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy Mediated by Methylene Blue and Potassium Iodide to Treat Urinary Tract Infection in a Female Rat Model. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 7257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Parasuraman, P.; Anju, V.T.; Sruthil Lal, S.; Sharan, A.; Busi, S.; Kaviyarasu, K.; Arshad, M.; Dawoud, T.M.S.; Syed, A. Synthesis and Antimicrobial Photodynamic Effect of Methylene Blue Conjugated Carbon Nanotubes on E. Coli and S. Aureus. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2019, 18, 563–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Seo, S.-H.; Kim, B.-M.; Joe, A.; Han, H.-W.; Chen, X.; Cheng, Z.; Jang, E.-S. NIR-Light-Induced Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering for Detection and Photothermal/Photodynamic Therapy of Cancer Cells Using Methylene Blue-Embedded Gold Nanorod@SiO2 Nanocomposites. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 3309–3318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Lv, J.; Wu, G.; He, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yi, Y. Methylene Blue-Loaded Gold Nanobipyramids @SiO2 Enhanced Singlet Oxygen Generation for Phototherapy of Cancer Cells. Opt. Mater. Express 2017, 7, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, Y.; Wen, T.; Zhao, R.; Liu, X.; Ji, T.; Wang, H.; Shi, X.; Shi, J.; Wei, J.; Zhao, Y.; et al. Localized Electric Field of Plasmonic Nanoplatform Enhanced Photodynamic Tumor Therapy. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 11529–11542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Huang, X.; El-Sayed, I.H.; Qian, W.; El-Sayed, M.A. Cancer Cell Imaging and Photothermal Therapy in the Near-Infrared Region by Using Gold Nanorods. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2115–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mackey, M.A.; Ali, M.R.K.; Austin, L.A.; Near, R.D.; El-Sayed, M.A. The Most Effective Gold Nanorod Size for Plasmonic Photothermal Therapy: Theory and in Vitro Experiments. J. Phys. Chem. B 2014, 118, 1319–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Mahmoud, N.N.; Alkilany, A.M.; Khalil, E.A.; Al-Bakri, A.G. Antibacterial Activity of Gold Nanorods against Staphylococcus Aureus and Propionibacterium Acnes: Misinterpretations and Artifacts. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 7311–7322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Mohamed, M.M.; Fouad, S.A.; Elshoky, H.A.; Mohammed, G.M.; Salaheldin, T.A. Antibacterial Effect of Gold Nanoparticles against Corynebacterium Pseudotuberculosis. Int. J. Vet. Sci. Med. 2017, 5, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Mahmoud, N.N.; Alkilany, A.M.; Khalil, E.A.; Al-Bakri, A.G. Nano-Photothermal Ablation Effect of Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Functionalized Gold Nanorods on Staphylococcus Aureus and Propionibacterium Acnes. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 6881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, N.; Wang, C.; Wang, X.; Li, L. Synthesis of Photothermal Nanocomposites and Their Application to Antibacterial Assays. Nanotechnology 2018, 29, 175601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Khlebtsov, B.N.; Tuchina, E.S.; Khanadeev, V.A.; Panfilova, E.V.; Petrov, P.O.; Tuchin, V.V.; Khlebtsov, N.G. Enhanced Photoinactivation of Staphylococcus Aureus with Nanocomposites Containing Plasmonic Particles and Hematoporphyrin. J. Biophotonics 2013, 6, 338–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Schneider, C.A.; Rasband, W.S.; Eliceiri, K.W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 Years of Image Analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 671–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Scarabelli, L.; Sánchez-Iglesias, A.; Pérez-Juste, J.; Liz-Marzán, L.M. A “Tips and Tricks” Practical Guide to the Synthesis of Gold Nanorods. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 4270–4279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Monem, A.S.; Elbialy, N.; Mohamed, N. Mesoporous Silica Coated Gold Nanorods Loaded Doxorubicin for Combined Chemo-Photothermal Therapy. Int. J. Pharm. 2014, 470, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Cockerill, F.R.; Wiker, M.A.; Alder, J.; Dudley, M.N.; Eliopoulos, G.M.; Ferraro, M.J.; Hardy, D.J.; Hecht, D.W.; Hindler, J.A.; Patel, J.B.; et al. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically; Approved Standard—Ninth Edition; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2012; Volume 32. [Google Scholar]
  33. Pérez-Laguna, V.; Pérez-Artiaga, L.; Lampaya-Pérez, V.; López, S.C.; García-Luque, I.; Revillo, M.J.; Nonell, S.; Gilaberte, Y.; Rezusta, A. Comparative Effect of Photodynamic Therapy on Separated or Mixed Cultures of Streptococcus Mutans and Streptococcus Sanguinis. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 2017, 19, 98–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wu, W.-C.; Tracy, J.B. Large-Scale Silica Overcoating of Gold Nanorods with Tunable Shell Thicknesses. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 2888–2894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Rowe, L.R.; Chapman, B.S.; Tracy, J.B. Understanding and Controlling the Morphology of Silica Shells on Gold Nanorods. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30, 6249–6258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Huang, L.; Chen, X.; Li, Q. Synthesis of Microporous Molecular Sieves by Surfactant Decomposition. J. Mater. Chem. 2001, 11, 610–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Reinhardt, N.; Adumeau, L.; Lambert, O.; Ravaine, S.; Mornet, S. Quaternary Ammonium Groups Exposed at the Surface of Silica Nanoparticles Suitable for DNA Complexation in the Presence of Cationic Lipids. J. Phys. Chem. B 2015, 119, 6401–6411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. De Barros, H.R.; Piovan, L.; Sassaki, G.L.; de Araujo Sabry, D.; Mattoso, N.; Nunes, Á.M.; Meneghetti, M.R.; Riegel-Vidotti, I.C. Surface Interactions of Gold Nanorods and Polysaccharides: From Clusters to Individual Nanoparticles. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 152, 479–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nithiyanantham, U.; Ozaydin, M.F.; Tazebay, A.S.; Kundu, S. Low Temperature Formation of Rectangular PbTe Nanocrystals and Their Thermoelectric Properties. New J. Chem. 2016, 40, 265–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Azarshin, S.; Moghadasi, J.; A Aboosadi, Z. Surface Functionalization of Silica Nanoparticles to Improve the Performance of Water Flooding in Oil Wet Reservoirs. Energy Explor. Exploit. 2017, 35, 685–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Djafari, J.; Fernández-Lodeiro, C.; Fernández-Lodeiro, A.; Silva, V.; Poeta, P.; Igrejas, G.; Lodeiro, C.; Capelo, J.L.; Fernández-Lodeiro, J. Exploring the Control in Antibacterial Activity of Silver Triangular Nanoplates by Surface Coating Modulation. Front. Chem. 2019, 6, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wu, C.; Xu, Q.-H. Stable and Functionable Mesoporous Silica-Coated Gold Nanorods as Sensitive Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance (LSPR) Nanosensors. Langmuir 2009, 25, 9441–9446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kaur, I.; Ellis, L.-J.; Romer, I.; Tantra, R.; Carriere, M.; Allard, S.; Mayne-L’Hermite, M.; Minelli, C.; Unger, W.; Potthoff, A.; et al. Dispersion of Nanomaterials in Aqueous Media: Towards Procol Optimization. JoVE 2017, 130, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Shenoi, R.A. Sugar-based systems. In Engineering of Biomaterials for Drug Delivery Systems; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 273–297. [Google Scholar]
  45. Abdelwahed, W.; Degobert, G.; Stainmesse, S.; Fessi, H. Freeze-Drying of Nanoparticles: Formulation, Process and Storage Considerations. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2006, 58, 1688–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Fonte, P.; Reis, S.; Sarmento, B. Facts and Evidences on the Lyophilization of Polymeric Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery. J. Control. Release 2016, 225, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Crowe, L.M.; Reid, D.S.; Crowe, J.H. Is Trehalose Special for Preserving Dry Biomaterials? Biophys. J. 1996, 71, 2087–2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Andreani, T.; Kiill, C.P.; de Souza, A.L.R.; Fangueiro, J.F.; Doktorovová, S.; Garcia, M.L.; Gramião, M.P.D.; Silva, A.M.; Souto, E.B. Effect of Cryoprotectants on the Reconstitution of Silica Nanoparticles Produced by Sol–Gel Technology. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2015, 120, 1001–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sameti, M.; Bohr, G.; Ravi Kumar, M.N.V.; Kneuer, C.; Bakowsky, U.; Nacken, M.; Schmidt, H.; Lehr, C.-M. Stabilisation by Freeze-Drying of Cationically Modified Silica Nanoparticles for Gene Delivery. Int. J. Pharm. 2003, 266, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Auer, G.K.; Weibel, D.B. Bacterial Cell Mechanics. Biochemistry 2017, 56, 3710–3724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Epand, R.M.; Walker, C.; Epand, R.F.; Magarvey, N.A. Molecular Mechanisms of Membrane Targeting Antibiotics. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2016, 1858, 980–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Benaroudj, N.; Lee, D.H.; Goldberg, A.L. Trehalose Accumulation during Cellular Stress Protects Cells and Cellular Proteins from Damage by Oxygen Radicals. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 24261–24267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tang, M.; Waring, A.J.; Hong, M. Trehalose-Protected Lipid Membranes for Determining Membrane Protein Structure and Insertion. J. Magn. Reson. 2007, 184, 222–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Mandal, S.; Debnath, K.; Jana, N.R.; Jana, N.R. Trehalose-Functionalized Gold Nanoparticle for Inhibiting Intracellular Protein Aggregation. Langmuir 2017, 33, 13996–14003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Vanaporn, M.; Titball, R.W. Trehalose and Bacterial Virulence. Virulence 2020, 11, 1192–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Li, R.; Chen, J.; Cesario, T.C.; Wang, X.; Yuan, J.S.; Rentzepis, P.M. Synergistic Reaction of Silver Nitrate, Silver Nanoparticles, and Methylene Blue against Bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 13612–13617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nanomaterials 11 01338 g001
Figure 1. Normalized extinction spectra (a), representative TEM images (b), histograms (counting of 200 nanoparticles), and graphic representation of AuNRs obtained (c–e). The colloid solution was washed using CTAB solution of 1 mM before use as a precursor in the subsequent deposition silica process.
Figure 1. Normalized extinction spectra (a), representative TEM images (b), histograms (counting of 200 nanoparticles), and graphic representation of AuNRs obtained (c–e). The colloid solution was washed using CTAB solution of 1 mM before use as a precursor in the subsequent deposition silica process.
Nanomaterials 11 01338 g001
Nanomaterials 11 01338 g002
Figure 2. Representative TEM images (a–c), histograms and graphic representation of AuNRs@Simes (d).
Figure 2. Representative TEM images (a–c), histograms and graphic representation of AuNRs@Simes (d).
Nanomaterials 11 01338 g002
Nanomaterials 11 01338 g003
Figure 3. Normalized extinction spectra (a), z-potential (b) and FT-IR extensions spectra between 1700 and 1300 cm–1 (c) and 900 and 500 cm−1 (d) of AuNRs@Simes purified with MeOH or water. (The UV-Vis spectra and z-potential were recorded in Milli-Q water upon the corresponding purification process).
Figure 3. Normalized extinction spectra (a), z-potential (b) and FT-IR extensions spectra between 1700 and 1300 cm–1 (c) and 900 and 500 cm−1 (d) of AuNRs@Simes purified with MeOH or water. (The UV-Vis spectra and z-potential were recorded in Milli-Q water upon the corresponding purification process).
Nanomaterials 11 01338 g003
Nanomaterials 11 01338 g004
Figure 4. Absorption spectra of an aliquot of AuNRs@Simes-MB (axis y—left) and MB (axis y—right) in water solution.
Figure 4. Absorption spectra of an aliquot of AuNRs@Simes-MB (axis y—left) and MB (axis y—right) in water solution.
Nanomaterials 11 01338 g004
Nanomaterials 11 01338 g005
Figure 5. Lyophilized and resuspended sample (a), normalized extinction spectra of AuNRs@Simes-MB after resuspension and MB in water solution (b) and representative SEM images after resuspension in Milli-Q water (c).
Figure 5. Lyophilized and resuspended sample (a), normalized extinction spectra of AuNRs@Simes-MB after resuspension and MB in water solution (b) and representative SEM images after resuspension in Milli-Q water (c).
Nanomaterials 11 01338 g005
Nanomaterials 11 01338 g006
Figure 6. Inactivation of S. aureus (left) and E. coli (right) using different concentrations of formulation (AuNRs@Simes-MB) after exposure to the red laser. Other letters within the same curve indicate statistically significant differences among Log10 CFU/mL (p < 0.05).
Figure 6. Inactivation of S. aureus (left) and E. coli (right) using different concentrations of formulation (AuNRs@Simes-MB) after exposure to the red laser. Other letters within the same curve indicate statistically significant differences among Log10 CFU/mL (p < 0.05).
Nanomaterials 11 01338 g006
Table 1. Antibacterial activity of AuNRs samples against E. coli and S. aureus. Different letters within the same column indicate statistically significant differences among samples (p < 0.05).
Table 1. Antibacterial activity of AuNRs samples against E. coli and S. aureus. Different letters within the same column indicate statistically significant differences among samples (p < 0.05).
SamplesE. coliS. aureus
Log10CFU/mLLog ReductionLog10CFU/mLLog Reduction
I Control7.58 ± 0.20 (a)-7.55 ± 0.11 (a, b)-
NR Control7.70 ± 0.24 (a)-7.51 ± 0.06 (a, b, c)-
* AuNRs@Simes (1 mg/mL)7.88 ± 0.03 (a)<16.70 ± 0.26 (e)<1
** AuNRs@Simes (1 mg/mL)7.98 ± 0.09 (a)<16.97 ± 0.13 (d, e)<1
* AuNRs@Simes-MB (1 mg/mL)<1>7.58 ± 0.00<1>7.55 ± 0.00
** AuNRs@Simes-MB (1 mg/mL)7.66 ± 0.10 (a)<17.13 ± 0.15 (c, d)<1
* MB (0.015 mg/mL)<1>7.58 ± 0.00<1>7.55 ± 0.00
** MB (0.015 mg/mL)5.52 ± 0.21 (c)2.18 ± 0.217.20 ± 0.12 (b, c, d)<1
* TRH (10.34 mg/mL)7.86 ± 0.13 (a)<17.95 ± 0.01 (a)<1
* MB (0.015 mg/mL) + TRH (10 mg/mL)<1>7.58 ± 0.00<1>7.55 ± 0.00
** MB (0.015 mg/mL) + TRH (10 mg/mL)6.64 ± 0.07 (b)1.06 ± 0.077.20 ± 0.16 (b, c, d)<1
* I = Irradiated; ** NR = Non-irradiated; TRH = Trehalose; MB = Methylene Blue.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fernández-Lodeiro, A.; Djafari, J.; Fernández-Lodeiro, J.; Duarte, M.P.; Muchagato Mauricio, E.; Capelo-Martínez, J.L.; Lodeiro, C. Synthesis of Mesoporous Silica Coated Gold Nanorods Loaded with Methylene Blue and Its Potentials in Antibacterial Applications. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1338. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11051338

AMA Style

Fernández-Lodeiro A, Djafari J, Fernández-Lodeiro J, Duarte MP, Muchagato Mauricio E, Capelo-Martínez JL, Lodeiro C. Synthesis of Mesoporous Silica Coated Gold Nanorods Loaded with Methylene Blue and Its Potentials in Antibacterial Applications. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11(5):1338. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11051338

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fernández-Lodeiro, Adrián, Jamila Djafari, Javier Fernández-Lodeiro, Maria Paula Duarte, Elisabete Muchagato Mauricio, José Luis Capelo-Martínez, and Carlos Lodeiro. 2021. "Synthesis of Mesoporous Silica Coated Gold Nanorods Loaded with Methylene Blue and Its Potentials in Antibacterial Applications" Nanomaterials 11, no. 5: 1338. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11051338

APA Style

Fernández-Lodeiro, A., Djafari, J., Fernández-Lodeiro, J., Duarte, M. P., Muchagato Mauricio, E., Capelo-Martínez, J. L., & Lodeiro, C. (2021). Synthesis of Mesoporous Silica Coated Gold Nanorods Loaded with Methylene Blue and Its Potentials in Antibacterial Applications. Nanomaterials, 11(5), 1338. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11051338

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop