Next Article in Journal
Anti-Bacterial Properties and Biocompatibility of Novel SiC Coating for Dental Ceramic
Next Article in Special Issue
Biodegradable Polymeric Micro/Nano-Structures with Intrinsic Antifouling/Antimicrobial Properties: Relevance in Damaged Skin and Other Biomedical Applications
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Autologous Matrix of Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Wound Care Settings: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Determination and Quantification of the Distribution of CN-NL Nanoparticles Encapsulating Glycyrrhetic Acid on Novel Textile Surfaces with Hyperspectral Imaging

J. Funct. Biomater. 2020, 11(2), 32; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb11020032
by Kudirat A. Obisesan, Simona Neri, Elodie Bugnicourt, Inmaculada Campos and Laura Rodriguez-Turienzo *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Funct. Biomater. 2020, 11(2), 32; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb11020032
Submission received: 31 January 2020 / Revised: 20 April 2020 / Accepted: 22 April 2020 / Published: 20 May 2020

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

See comments in attached document

Comments for author File: Comments.docx

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

 

The paper presented to review reports the study with the capability of applying Hyperspectral imaging techniques in both the SWIR and ViSNIR ranges coupling with chemometric tools to study the distribution and quantify the content of actives substances (CLA compounds) on chitosan and pullulan textile substrates.

 

Here are some ways on how the paper can be improved:

Introduction:

The Introduction section need a major revision with a better explanation of the study propose and proper reference included showing a small state of the art.

Results:

Results are well presented,although the graphs need a higher quality image.

Discussion:

I have no comments.

Conclusions:

I suggest to introduce a future work paragraph.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The quality of the paper was greatly improved. I just have a few last suggestions:

  • Currently, the references seem to be positioned at the end of the paragraphs. The standard I know is to locate the reference at the end of the first sentence of a series of successive sentences referring to the same source(s). You include again the reference at the end of the first sentence if you start another paragraph with the same source.
  • There are some typos and grammatical errors left, so you should have the manuscript proof-edited.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop