Next Article in Journal
Meta-Intelligence: Understanding, Control, and Interactivity between Creative, Analytical, Practical, and Wisdom-Based Approaches in Problem Solving
Next Article in Special Issue
How Executive Processes Explain the Overlap between Working Memory Capacity and Fluid Intelligence: A Test of Process Overlap Theory
Previous Article in Journal
Unity Is Intelligence: A Collective Intelligence Experiment on ECG Reading to Improve Diagnostic Performance in Cardiology
Previous Article in Special Issue
Advancing the Understanding of the Factor Structure of Executive Functioning

Binding Costs in Processing Efficiency as Determinants of Cognitive Ability

Institute for Psychology and Pedagogy, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 47, 89081 Ulm, Germany
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 19 November 2020 / Revised: 1 March 2021 / Accepted: 16 March 2021 / Published: 1 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue g and Its Underlying Executive Processes)
Performance in elementary cognitive tasks is moderately correlated with fluid intelligence and working memory capacity. These correlations are higher for more complex tasks, presumably due to increased demands on working memory capacity. In accordance with the binding hypothesis, which states that working memory capacity reflects the limit of a person’s ability to establish and maintain temporary bindings (e.g., relations between items or relations between items and their context), we manipulated binding requirements (i.e., 2, 4, and 6 relations) in three choice reaction time paradigms (i.e., two comparison tasks, two change detection tasks, and two substitution tasks) measuring mental speed. Response time distributions of 115 participants were analyzed with the diffusion model. Higher binding requirements resulted in generally reduced efficiency of information processing, as indicated by lower drift rates. Additionally, we fitted bi-factor confirmatory factor analysis to the elementary cognitive tasks to separate basal speed and binding requirements of the employed tasks to quantify their specific contributions to working memory capacity, as measured by Recall−1-Back tasks. A latent factor capturing individual differences in binding was incrementally predictive of working memory capacity, over and above a general factor capturing speed. These results indicate that the relation between reaction time tasks and working memory capacity hinges on the complexity of the reaction time tasks. We conclude that binding requirements and, therefore, demands on working memory capacity offer a satisfactory account of task complexity that accounts for a large portion of individual differences in ability. View Full-Text
Keywords: mental speed; binding; working memory capacity mental speed; binding; working memory capacity
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Goecke, B.; Schmitz, F.; Wilhelm, O. Binding Costs in Processing Efficiency as Determinants of Cognitive Ability. J. Intell. 2021, 9, 18.

AMA Style

Goecke B, Schmitz F, Wilhelm O. Binding Costs in Processing Efficiency as Determinants of Cognitive Ability. Journal of Intelligence. 2021; 9(2):18.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Goecke, Benjamin, Florian Schmitz, and Oliver Wilhelm. 2021. "Binding Costs in Processing Efficiency as Determinants of Cognitive Ability" Journal of Intelligence 9, no. 2: 18.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop