Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
A Mokken Scale Analysis of the Last Series of the Standard Progressive Matrices (SPM-LS)
Previous Article in Journal
Mitochondrial Functioning ≠ General Intelligence
Previous Article in Special Issue
How Much g Is in the Distractor? Re-Thinking Item-Analysis of Multiple-Choice Items
Article

Diagnosing a 12-Item Dataset of Raven Matrices: With Dexter

Cito, 6814 CM Arnhem, The Netherlands
Received: 21 February 2020 / Revised: 21 April 2020 / Accepted: 27 April 2020 / Published: 6 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Analysis of an Intelligence Dataset)
We analyze a 12-item version of Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices test, traditionally scored with the sum score. We discuss some important differences between assessment in practice and psychometric modelling. We demonstrate some advanced diagnostic tools in the freely available R package, dexter. We find that the first item in the test functions badly—at a guess, because the subjects were not given exercise items before the live test. View Full-Text
Keywords: intelligence tests; classical test theory; IRT; interaction model; test-item regression intelligence tests; classical test theory; IRT; interaction model; test-item regression
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Partchev, I. Diagnosing a 12-Item Dataset of Raven Matrices: With Dexter. J. Intell. 2020, 8, 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence8020021

AMA Style

Partchev I. Diagnosing a 12-Item Dataset of Raven Matrices: With Dexter. Journal of Intelligence. 2020; 8(2):21. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence8020021

Chicago/Turabian Style

Partchev, Ivailo. 2020. "Diagnosing a 12-Item Dataset of Raven Matrices: With Dexter" Journal of Intelligence 8, no. 2: 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence8020021

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop