Semi-Empirical Estimation of Aerosol Particle Influence at the Performance of Terrestrial FSO Links over the Sea
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Experimental Setup and Methodology
2.1. FSO Link Configuration
2.2. Atmospheric Sensing Equipment
- PM2.5 Concentration Sensors:
- Optical particle counters capable of detecting and logging PM2.5 were installed near both the transmitter and receiver sites. These sensors provided real-time measurements of aerosol concentration in micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3), recorded at intervals of 10 min.
- Weather Station:
- An accurate meteorological station is installed at the transmitter side and recorded the following three key atmospheric parameters:
- ○
- Temperature (in °C).
- ○
- Relative humidity (%).
- ○
- Wind speed and direction (in m/s and degrees (°), respectively).
2.3. RSSI-Based Optical Power Measurement
2.4. Data Acquisition and Synchronization
2.5. Methodology for Model Derivation
- Data alignment:
- Outlier removal:
- Correlation analysis:
- Regression modeling:
- Validation:
3. Results
3.1. PM2.5 Concentration and Received Optical Power Trends
3.2. Correlation Analysis
3.3. Estimation of Attenuation Coefficient Using RSSI and PM2.5 Measurements
3.4. Empirical Equation Model Derivation
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ali, K.M.; Uysal, M. Survey on free space optical communication: A communication theory perspective. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2014, 16, 2231–2258. [Google Scholar]
- Hennes, H.; Wilfert, O. An introduction to free-space optical communications. Radioengineering 2010, 19, 203–212. [Google Scholar]
- Nistazakis Hector, E.; Stassinakis, A.N.; Sinanović, S.; Popoola, W.O.; Tombras, G.S. Performance of quadrature amplitude modulation orthogonal frequency division multiplexing-based free space optical links with non-linear clipping effect over gamma–gamma modelled turbulence channels. IET Optoelectron. 2015, 9, 269–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ming, L.; Cvijetic, M. Coherent free space optics communications over the maritime atmosphere with use of adaptive optics for beam wavefront correction. Appl. Opt. 2015, 54, 1453–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Juarez Juan, C.; Sluz, J.E.; Nelson, C.; Airola, M.B.; Fitch, M.J.; Young, D.W.; Terry, D.; Davidson, F.M.; Rottier, J.R.; Sova, R.M. Free-space optical channel characterization in the maritime environment. In Atmospheric Propagation VII; SPIE: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010; Volume 7685. [Google Scholar]
- Willitsford, A.; Newell, K.T.; O’Toole, M.; Patel, K. Maritime free space optical communications field test and link budget statistics. Opt. Express 2024, 32, 13769–13782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rabinovich, W.S.; Mahon, R.; Ferraro, M.S. Estimating maritime free space optical link performance using models based on experimental measurements. In Laser Communication and Propagation through the Atmosphere and Oceans XII; SPIE: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; Volume 12691, pp. 66–81. [Google Scholar]
- Alqurashi, F.S.; Trichili, A.; Saeed, N.; Ooi, B.S.; Alouini, M.S. Maritime communications: A survey on enabling technologies, opportunities, and challenges. IEEE Internet Things J. 2022, 10, 3525–3547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rabinovich, W.S.; Mahon, R.; Ferraro, M.S. Optical scintillation in a maritime environment. Opt. Express 2023, 31, 10217–10236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zabih, G.; Popoola, W. Terrestrial free-space optical communications. In Mobile and Wireless Communications Network Layer and Circuit Level Design; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2010; Volume 17, pp. 355–391. [Google Scholar]
- Lionis, A.; Chaskakis, G.; Cohn, K.; Blau, J.; Peppas, K.; Nistazakis, H.E.; Tsigopoulos, A. Optical turbulence measurements and modeling over Monterey Bay. Opt. Commun. 2022, 520, 128508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, R.S.; Telg, H.; McLaughlin, R.J.; Ciciora, S.J.; Watts, L.A.; Richardson, M.S.; Schwarz, J.P.; Perring, A.E.; Thornberry, T.D.; Rollins, A.W.; et al. A light-weight, high-sensitivity particle spectrometer for PM2.5 aerosol measurements. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 88–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xing, Y.; Shi, W.; Luo, N.; Zhao, W.; Wang, H.; Yu, X. Satellite-based PM2.5 estimation using fine-mode aerosol optical thickness over China. Atmos. Environ. 2017, 170, 290–302. [Google Scholar]
- Helsdingen, W.; den Breeje, R.; Saathof, R. Modeling the physical layer of air-to-space optical communication networks using the modified multi-scale method. J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 2025, 17, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galaktionov, I.; Toporovsky, V. Performance Analysis of an Optical System for FSO Communications Utilizing Combined Stochastic Gradient Descent Optimization Algorithm. Appl. Syst. Innov. 2025, 8, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schiavon, M.; Vanzo, A.; Campaci, K.; Marulanda Acosta, V.; Bonora, S. Multi-Actuator Lens Systems for Turbulence Correction in Free-Space Optical Communications. Photonics 2025, 12, 870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stassinakis Argyris, N.; Papavgeris, G.A.; Nistazakis, H.E.; Tsigopoulos, A.D.; Androutsos, N.A.; Tombras, G.S. Experimental model development for the attenuation coefficient estimation of terrestrial optical wireless links over the sea. Telecom 2021, 2, 93–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, C.; Labzovskii, L.D.; Mak, H.W.L.; Fung, J.C.H.; Lau, A.K.H.; Kenea, S.T.; Bilal, M.; Hey, J.D.V.; Lu, X.; Ma, J. Observation of PM2.5 using a combination of satellite remote sensing and low-cost sensor network in Siberian urban areas with limited reference monitoring. Atmos. Environ. 2020, 227, 117410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garcia, A.A.; Sayago, A.; González, A.G. The correlation coefficient: An overview. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2006, 36, 41–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marko, S.; Mooi, E. Regression analysis. In A Concise Guide to Market Research: The Process, Data, and Methods Using IBM SPSS Statistics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 209–256. [Google Scholar]
- Chicco, D.; Warrens, M.J.; Jurman, G. The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 2021, 7, e623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Willmott, C.J.; Matsuura, K. Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Clim. Res. 2005, 30, 79–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Lu, Y. Analysis of the mean absolute error (MAE) and the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing rounding model. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Proceedings of the 2017 the 5th International Conference on Mechanical Engineering, Materials Science and Civil Engineering, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 15–16 December 2017; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2018; Volume 324. [Google Scholar]






| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Link Length | 2958 m |
| Wavelength | 830–860 nm |
| Optical Power | 150 mW (using 3 laser beams) |
| Height | 30 m |
| Receiver sensitivity | −30 dBm |
| Beam Divergence Angle | 2 mrad |
| Modulation Scheme | On-Off Keying |
| RSSI (mW) | PM2.5 (μg/m3) | |
|---|---|---|
| Range | 415–573 | 2–180 |
| Average | 501 | 62.1 |
| Standard Deviation | 27.06 | 44.57 |
| a1 | a2 | a3 |
|---|---|---|
| −0.0012 | −0.2766 | 525.1 |
| Statistical Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| RMSE | 17.8 (mV) |
| MAE | 14.2 (mV) |
| R2 | 0.57 (mV) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Stassinakis, A.N.; Chatzikontis, E.V.; Drexler, K.R.; Tsigopoulos, A.D.; Mkrttchian, G.; Nistazakis, H.E. Semi-Empirical Estimation of Aerosol Particle Influence at the Performance of Terrestrial FSO Links over the Sea. Computation 2026, 14, 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/computation14020039
Stassinakis AN, Chatzikontis EV, Drexler KR, Tsigopoulos AD, Mkrttchian G, Nistazakis HE. Semi-Empirical Estimation of Aerosol Particle Influence at the Performance of Terrestrial FSO Links over the Sea. Computation. 2026; 14(2):39. https://doi.org/10.3390/computation14020039
Chicago/Turabian StyleStassinakis, Argyris N., Efstratios V. Chatzikontis, Kyle R. Drexler, Andreas D. Tsigopoulos, Gratchia Mkrttchian, and Hector E. Nistazakis. 2026. "Semi-Empirical Estimation of Aerosol Particle Influence at the Performance of Terrestrial FSO Links over the Sea" Computation 14, no. 2: 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/computation14020039
APA StyleStassinakis, A. N., Chatzikontis, E. V., Drexler, K. R., Tsigopoulos, A. D., Mkrttchian, G., & Nistazakis, H. E. (2026). Semi-Empirical Estimation of Aerosol Particle Influence at the Performance of Terrestrial FSO Links over the Sea. Computation, 14(2), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/computation14020039

