Next Article in Journal
Robust Aircraft Detection with a Simple and Efficient Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Roboethics: Fundamental Concepts and Future Prospects
Previous Article in Journal
Random Linear Network Coding for 5G Mobile Video Delivery
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

Can Social Robots Qualify for Moral Consideration? Reframing the Question about Robot Rights

Department of Philosophy, Rivier University, Nashua, NH 03060, USA
Information 2018, 9(4), 73; https://doi.org/10.3390/info9040073
Received: 25 February 2018 / Revised: 19 March 2018 / Accepted: 22 March 2018 / Published: 29 March 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue ROBOETHICS)
  |  
PDF [256 KB, uploaded 3 May 2018]

Abstract

A controversial question that has been hotly debated in the emerging field of robot ethics is whether robots should be granted rights. Yet, a review of the recent literature in that field suggests that this seemingly straightforward question is far from clear and unambiguous. For example, those who favor granting rights to robots have not always been clear as to which kinds of robots should (or should not) be eligible; nor have they been consistent with regard to which kinds of rights—civil, legal, moral, etc.—should be granted to qualifying robots. Also, there has been considerable disagreement about which essential criterion, or cluster of criteria, a robot would need to satisfy to be eligible for rights, and there is ongoing disagreement as to whether a robot must satisfy the conditions for (moral) agency to qualify either for rights or (at least some level of) moral consideration. One aim of this paper is to show how the current debate about whether to grant rights to robots would benefit from an analysis and clarification of some key concepts and assumptions underlying that question. My principal objective, however, is to show why we should reframe that question by asking instead whether some kinds of social robots qualify for moral consideration as moral patients. In arguing that the answer to this question is “yes,” I draw from some insights in the writings of Hans Jonas to defend my position. View Full-Text
Keywords: robot ethics; robot rights; social robots; moral agents; moral consideration; moral patients; Hans Jonas robot ethics; robot rights; social robots; moral agents; moral consideration; moral patients; Hans Jonas
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Tavani, H.T. Can Social Robots Qualify for Moral Consideration? Reframing the Question about Robot Rights. Information 2018, 9, 73.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Information EISSN 2078-2489 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top