1. Introduction
The theory of quantum information has developed into a cornerstone of modern quantum science, with potential applications ranging from quantum algorithms and secure communication [
1], to error correction [
2,
3], and quantum networking [
4]. Beyond its technological relevance, quantum information provides a unique perspective on the nature of the Universe and the phenomenon of entanglement [
5].
Quantum entanglement, famously described by Einstein as “spooky action at a distance” [
6], underlies many protocols in quantum cryptography [
7] and serves as a fundamental resource for quantum computation [
8]. Despite the progress in quantum information theory, its mathematical language remains under active development [
9,
10]. New mathematical frameworks are required to fully exploit its potential, both for computational purposes and for deepening our understanding of quantum reality [
11].
In this work, we introduce a new geometric formalism for the study of entangled states. We base our approach on two propositions: (1) representing bipartite entanglement through topological identifications in a three-dimensional ball
, and (2) modeling the measurement process as a collapse onto the 0-sphere
, corresponding to the two possible outcomes. Here, we interpret
as the 0-sphere, i.e., the discrete two-point set
, which we use to represent the binary outcomes of quantum measurement. Its topological disconnectivity reflects the intrinsic duality of entangled states. This formalism provides a natural mapping between the geometry of entanglement and quantum steering via spin-flip correlations. Previous work on the geometry in quantum information has explored several approaches to characterizing entanglement and measurement outcomes. Brody and Hughston [
12] developed a framework for geometric quantum mechanics using the Fubini–Study metric on projective Hilbert space, while Bengtsson and Życzkowski [
13] systematically studied the geometry of quantum state spaces, including entanglement polytopes and the Bloch sphere. Our approach builds on this tradition by focusing on a minimal topological representation, modeling the measurement process as a collapse from
to
. This viewpoint offers a simplified but rigorous mapping that may complement metric-based approaches and inspire new geometric methods for quantum information processing. Physically, the mapping
encapsulates the algorithmic correspondence between entanglement and measurement processes in quantum systems, whereby continuous state spaces are projected onto discrete outcome sets. In contrast to geometric quantum mechanics [
14], which relies on the Fubini–Study metric of projective Hilbert space
, the present framework replaces the metric structure with a purely topological one. This substitution emphasizes the discrete and non-metric nature of quantum measurement outcomes, while retaining a geometric intuition consistent with the projective viewpoint. Hence, the mapping
may be regarded as a minimal topological analogue of the projection from a continuous state manifold to discrete measurement results. This approach has possible extensions, including its embedding in the Bloch sphere representation [
15] and generalizations to higher-dimensional complex projective spaces
[
13]. These developments open the door to a differential-geometric treatment of quantum information, potentially yielding new insights into quantum computation, entanglement classification, and quantum state discrimination [
12,
13].
We start our framework by introducing two crucial definitions.
Definition 1. Let be an abstract state space (a source space), formalized as a 3-ball, whose points label the possible physical positions of individual, unentangled particles (i.e. two photons trapped in an own optical cavity or two electrons trapped in their own Penning trap). By simplicity, we let a point corresponds to a particle at a unique spatial position.
Definition 2. Let be the quotient space, an abstract state space of entangled particle pairs, constructed from the source space by imposing an equivalence relation ∼. This relation, defined by the measurement correlation , identifies pairs of points that represent entangled partners. The projection maps the distinct particle states x and y to a single equivalence class , representing the non-local entangled pair. In this space, the unique identity and individual positions x and y are lost, modeling the instantaneous correlation enforced by quantum entanglement.
Proposition 1 (Topological space for quantum entanglement). Let two particles be maximally entangled, where particle a is associated to a unique coordinate x, and particle b to y, with . Let the mapping represent the binary measurement process, such that and represent potential measurement outcomes at positions x and y, respectively.
We impose a deterministic relational operation R such that , with . This implies that any two states can be symmetrically or anti-symmetrically correlated (). Moreover, we have the induced map which is defined bywhere and is the quotient projection. Then, the space of quantum steering-mediated transformations between the two particles forms a topological manifold homeomorphic to , under the following conditions: The relation R induces an equivalence relation on , defined by .
For all scaling maps C, we have in .
For all operations A, we have in .
Here, the projection is the canonical quotient map in the category of topological spaces. The induced map is therefore well defined and continuous by construction.
The manifold thus represents a state-transformation space where only topological structure remains, making any metric properties from or irrelevant. Quantum steering transformations between maximally entangled states are thereby encoded as binary, disconnected, and nonlocal behaviors, yielding only two possible outcomes: . Moreover, the topological disconnectivity of can also reflect the quantum jumps inherent in state collapse, while its binary structure captures the intrinsic duality in the outcomes of entangled quantum systems. Proposition 1 can be formalized into the following diagram (Figure 1). Proof. Let be the coordinates of two maximally entangled particles. Consider the measurement map which assigns to each particle a potential measurement outcome .
By the definition of maximal entanglement, there exists a deterministic relation R such that with . This relation induces an equivalence relation on defined by .
Form the quotient space (representing the activation of entanglement) by the projection . The induced map defined by is well-defined because if , then , and since has only two elements , the assignment is well-defined up to the global correlation choice enforced by entanglement.
For any scaling map C or operation A, since in , we have and in the quotient space. Under , these map to the same element in , hence and in .
To prove is disconnected: take and . Then , , and both U and V are open (and closed) in the subspace topology inherited from . Hence, is disconnected. □
Remark 1. The equivalence relation defined in Proposition 1 groups states connected by a deterministic outcome relation R, where . To topologically distinguish between positively correlated (e.g., ) and anti-correlated (e.g., ) entangled states, the equivalence relation must be refined to encode the sign of R. We therefore define two distinct relations:
This yields two topologically distinct quotient spaces, and , which represent the correlated and anti-correlated entanglement classes, respectively. Consequently, the original projection map π is refined into distinct maps and , defined by and .
The original, coarser quotient space is recovered as the disjoint union of these two finer quotient spaces:The induced maps are defined in complete analogy to Proposition 1, satisfying the relation , which ensures the commutativity of the corresponding diagrams for each correlation type. The maps and then become well-defined classifiers on these separate spaces, preserving the crucial physical distinction between correlated and anti-correlated entanglement within the topological formalism. The topological framework developed above can be naturally extended to a differential geometric setting by considering the space of entangled particles as a smooth manifold. Let M be a smooth manifold representing the configuration space of entangled particles. We can then construct a fiber bundle that captures the measurement process in a geometrically richer context.
To do this, define as a continuous surjection assigning to each tangent space its discrete measurement outcome. The total space together with forms a trivial fiber bundle in the topological sense. We can then form the second proposition.
Proposition 2 (Representation of quantum steering as a fiber).
Let two isolated particles a and b respective at position x and y from proposition 1 be in space. Let each coordinate be the endpoints of a line d. We form a mapping so that become points on the circle . Construct a second mapping, so that are now found on the surface . Let a tangent space be formed by assigning two vectors intersecting at each point, for x, and for y, . By the two vector products we can form the tangent bundle , for . Then we have a fiber over x and y which is the tangent space at the respective pointwhere and , where , assigned to x and y in an either stationary state or in a moving state along the tangent vectors or a product thereof. We then form a second fiber, from each tangent space at respectively, which generates a value for each . Then is a fiber, where forms the base space and is the projection of the fibre space and is a trivially smooth manifold.This geometric construction can now be extended to entangled systems by considering the quotient space as the base space. For an entangled pair , the fiber represents quantum steering manifested through spin-flip operations, where spin-flip operations correspond to bundle isomorphisms that satisfy for tangent vectors v, representing the sign reversal of spin measurements. Applying a spin flip to either particle at x or y thus induces correlated outcomes in for any two entangled particles stationary at position or moving along the tangent vector bundle .
Proof. Consider the two points of the two un-entangled particles . Form a map , obtaining a circle. We then embed the circle in a 2-sphere yielding the configuration space .
Define the tangent spaces at points x and y respectively, where is spanned by orthonormal vectors and by . Construct the tangent bundle with projection defined by for . This forms a smooth fiber bundle with fiber .
Define the measurement fiber map as follows: for any tangent vector , let where is a fixed reference vector field on M and is the Riemannian metric. This map is continuous and surjective onto since the sign function partitions the tangent space into two open hemispheres.
Now consider the entangled case. From Proposition 1, any entangled pair satisfies . The base space becomes with tangent bundle . The fiber map now encodes steering correlations: for an entangled pair , the constraint with is preserved under because the equivalence relation ∼ identifies tangent spaces at x and y such that and are correlated by the same relation R.
Spin-flip operations are represented by bundle isomorphisms with , where the sign reversal captures the spin measurement flip. For an entangled pair , a spin flip at x induces such that while preserving the correlation through the entanglement relation R.
Bundle automorphisms preserve the structure because by definition they commute with the projection : any bundle automorphism satisfies , ensuring the discrete measurement outcomes are preserved. This completes the proof that represents quantum steering through spin-flip correlations in the fiber bundle formalism. □
Remark 2. Proposition 2 shows that quantum steering admits a fiber bundle description where measurement outcomes are encoded in discrete fibers. This topological framework reinterpretes quantum operations as geometric transformations on the bundle structure, rather than as linear operators in Hilbert space.
We can now form the following theorem.
Theorem 1 (Topological entanglement framework). Propositions 1 and 2 establish that bipartite entanglement and quantum steering admit a complete topological description using discrete fiber bundles. This framework naturally suggests extensions to multipartite systems via higher-dimensional base spaces B and fibers , where bundle automorphisms represent generalized steering transformations.
Theorem 1 has significant implications for quantum information processing. It suggests that entanglement can be treated as a topological phenomenon, where quantum correlations become structural features of fiber bundles. This perspective implies that entanglement classification could be approached through the classification of bundle structures, potentially yielding new entanglement invariants derived from homotopy or cohomology. The framework naturally scales to multi-qubit systems, offering a geometric foundation where quantum network nodes correspond to points in the base space, and entanglement distribution protocols like swapping or teleportation correspond to fiber bundle operations. Consequently, quantum communication protocols might be optimized using topological methods rather than conventional circuit models. Moreover, the theorem suggests that quantum steering admits a geometric interpretation as bundle automorphisms, offering a potentially more robust framework for describing correlated operations. This perspective may eventually enable the design of steering protocols based on topological constructions that are inherently stable—paralleling approaches in topological quantum computation that exploit braid group representations and topological invariants. The bundle formalism also shares mathematical similarities with geometric descriptions in theoretical physics, where fields are naturally described using fiber bundles over spacetime. This common mathematical language suggests deeper connections between quantum information geometry and fundamental physics frameworks.