Next Article in Journal
A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Classifiers for Enhancing Knee Osteoarthritis Diagnosis
Next Article in Special Issue
Edge-Guided Cell Segmentation on Small Datasets Using an Attention-Enhanced U-Net Architecture
Previous Article in Journal
QISS: Quantum-Enhanced Sustainable Security Incident Handling in the IoT
Previous Article in Special Issue
FUSeg: The Foot Ulcer Segmentation Challenge
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bridging the Gap: Exploring Interpretability in Deep Learning Models for Brain Tumor Detection and Diagnosis from MRI Images

1
Department of Mathematical and Computational Sciences, University of Venda, Thohoyandou 0950, South Africa
2
Department of Mathematics, Rhodes University, Grahamstown 6139, South Africa
3
Institute of Cognitive Science, Osnabrück University, 49074 Osnabrück, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Information 2024, 15(4), 182; https://doi.org/10.3390/info15040182
Submission received: 12 February 2024 / Revised: 7 March 2024 / Accepted: 16 March 2024 / Published: 27 March 2024

Abstract

The advent of deep learning (DL) has revolutionized medical imaging, offering unprecedented avenues for accurate disease classification and diagnosis. DL models have shown remarkable promise for classifying brain tumors from Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans. However, despite their impressive performance, the opaque nature of DL models poses challenges in understanding their decision-making mechanisms, particularly crucial in medical contexts where interpretability is essential. This paper explores the intersection of medical image analysis and DL interpretability, aiming to elucidate the decision-making rationale of DL models in brain tumor classification. Leveraging ten state-of-the-art DL frameworks with transfer learning, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation encompassing both classification accuracy and interpretability. These models underwent thorough training, testing, and fine-tuning, resulting in EfficientNetB0, DenseNet121, and Xception outperforming the other models. These top-performing models were examined using adaptive path-based techniques to understand the underlying decision-making mechanisms. Grad-CAM and Grad-CAM++ highlighted critical image regions where the models identified patterns and features associated with each class of the brain tumor. The regions where the models identified patterns and features correspond visually to the regions where the tumors are located in the images. This result shows that DL models learn important features and patterns in the regions where tumors are located for decision-making.
Keywords: transfer learning; deep learning; brain tumor classification; explainability; interpretability; Grad-CAM; Grad-CAM++; integrated gradient transfer learning; deep learning; brain tumor classification; explainability; interpretability; Grad-CAM; Grad-CAM++; integrated gradient

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nhlapho, W.; Atemkeng, M.; Brima, Y.; Ndogmo, J.-C. Bridging the Gap: Exploring Interpretability in Deep Learning Models for Brain Tumor Detection and Diagnosis from MRI Images. Information 2024, 15, 182. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15040182

AMA Style

Nhlapho W, Atemkeng M, Brima Y, Ndogmo J-C. Bridging the Gap: Exploring Interpretability in Deep Learning Models for Brain Tumor Detection and Diagnosis from MRI Images. Information. 2024; 15(4):182. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15040182

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nhlapho, Wandile, Marcellin Atemkeng, Yusuf Brima, and Jean-Claude Ndogmo. 2024. "Bridging the Gap: Exploring Interpretability in Deep Learning Models for Brain Tumor Detection and Diagnosis from MRI Images" Information 15, no. 4: 182. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15040182

APA Style

Nhlapho, W., Atemkeng, M., Brima, Y., & Ndogmo, J.-C. (2024). Bridging the Gap: Exploring Interpretability in Deep Learning Models for Brain Tumor Detection and Diagnosis from MRI Images. Information, 15(4), 182. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15040182

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop