Next Article in Journal
Mapping the Landscape of Misinformation Detection: A Bibliometric Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
Analyzing Biomedical Datasets with Symbolic Tree Adaptive Resonance Theory
Previous Article in Journal
Integrated Generative Adversarial Networks and Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Image Data Classification: A Case Study for COVID-19
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Psychometric Function for Focusing Attention on Pitch
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An ART Tour de Force on Mental Imagery: Vividness, Individual Bias Differences, and Complementary Visual Processing Streams

by
Amedeo D’Angiulli
*,
Christy Laarakker
and
Derrick Matthew Buchanan
Department of Neuroscience, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Information 2024, 15(1), 59; https://doi.org/10.3390/info15010059
Submission received: 14 November 2023 / Revised: 16 January 2024 / Accepted: 16 January 2024 / Published: 19 January 2024

Abstract

Grossberg’s adaptive resonance theory (ART) provides a framework for understanding possible interactions between mental imagery and visual perception. Our purpose was to integrate, within ART, the phenomenological notion of mental image vividness and thus investigate the possible biasing effects of individual differences on visual processing. Using a Vernier acuity task, we tested whether indirect estimation of relative V1 size (small, medium, large) and self-reported vividness, in three subgroups of 53 observers, could predict significant effects of priming, interference, or more extreme Perky effects (negative and positive), which could be induced by imagery, impacting acuity performance. The results showed that small V1 was correlated with priming and/or negative Perky effects independently of vividness; medium V1 was related to interference at low vividness but priming at high vividness; and large V1 was related to positive Perky effects at high vividness but negative Perky effects at low vividness. Our interpretation of ART and related modeling based on ARTSCAN contributes to expanding Grossberg’s comprehensive understanding of how and why individually experienced vividness may drive the differential use of the dorsal and ventral complementary visual processing pathways, resulting in the observed effects of imagery on concurrent perception.
Keywords: adaptive resonance theory; imagery; perception; vividness; visual cortex; visual priming; perky effect adaptive resonance theory; imagery; perception; vividness; visual cortex; visual priming; perky effect

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

D’Angiulli, A.; Laarakker, C.; Buchanan, D.M. An ART Tour de Force on Mental Imagery: Vividness, Individual Bias Differences, and Complementary Visual Processing Streams. Information 2024, 15, 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15010059

AMA Style

D’Angiulli A, Laarakker C, Buchanan DM. An ART Tour de Force on Mental Imagery: Vividness, Individual Bias Differences, and Complementary Visual Processing Streams. Information. 2024; 15(1):59. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15010059

Chicago/Turabian Style

D’Angiulli, Amedeo, Christy Laarakker, and Derrick Matthew Buchanan. 2024. "An ART Tour de Force on Mental Imagery: Vividness, Individual Bias Differences, and Complementary Visual Processing Streams" Information 15, no. 1: 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15010059

APA Style

D’Angiulli, A., Laarakker, C., & Buchanan, D. M. (2024). An ART Tour de Force on Mental Imagery: Vividness, Individual Bias Differences, and Complementary Visual Processing Streams. Information, 15(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15010059

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop