Next Article in Journal
Electronic Identification for Universities: Building Cross-Border Services Based on the eIDAS Infrastructure
Next Article in Special Issue
AndroShield: Automated Android Applications Vulnerability Detection, a Hybrid Static and Dynamic Analysis Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Latent Feature Group Learning for High-Dimensional Data Clustering
Previous Article in Special Issue
Improving Intrusion Detection Model Prediction by Threshold Adaptation

An Intelligent Spam Detection Model Based on Artificial Immune System

College of Engineering, IT and Environment, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, NT 0810, Australia
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Information 2019, 10(6), 209;
Received: 31 May 2019 / Revised: 9 June 2019 / Accepted: 9 June 2019 / Published: 12 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Machine Learning for Cyber-Security)
Spam emails, also known as non-self, are unsolicited commercial or malicious emails, sent to affect either a single individual or a corporation or a group of people. Besides advertising, these may contain links to phishing or malware hosting websites set up to steal confidential information. In this paper, a study of the effectiveness of using a Negative Selection Algorithm (NSA) for anomaly detection applied to spam filtering is presented. NSA has a high performance and a low false detection rate. The designed framework intelligently works through three detection phases to finally determine an email’s legitimacy based on the knowledge gathered in the training phase. The system operates by elimination through Negative Selection similar to the functionality of T-cells’ in biological systems. It has been observed that with the inclusion of more datasets, the performance continues to improve, resulting in a 6% increase of True Positive and True Negative detection rate while achieving an actual detection rate of spam and ham of 98.5%. The model has been further compared against similar studies, and the result shows that the proposed system results in an increase of 2 to 15% in the correct detection rate of spam and ham. View Full-Text
Keywords: spam; ham; phishing; anomaly detection; Negative Selection spam; ham; phishing; anomaly detection; Negative Selection
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Saleh, A.J.; Karim, A.; Shanmugam, B.; Azam, S.; Kannoorpatti, K.; Jonkman, M.; Boer, F.D. An Intelligent Spam Detection Model Based on Artificial Immune System. Information 2019, 10, 209.

AMA Style

Saleh AJ, Karim A, Shanmugam B, Azam S, Kannoorpatti K, Jonkman M, Boer FD. An Intelligent Spam Detection Model Based on Artificial Immune System. Information. 2019; 10(6):209.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Saleh, Abdul J., Asif Karim, Bharanidharan Shanmugam, Sami Azam, Krishnan Kannoorpatti, Mirjam Jonkman, and Friso D. Boer. 2019. "An Intelligent Spam Detection Model Based on Artificial Immune System" Information 10, no. 6: 209.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop