Next Article in Journal
Related Stocks Selection with Data Collaboration Using Text Mining
Previous Article in Journal
Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimation by a Novel Numerical Binning-Less Isotonic Statistical Bivariate Numerical Modeling Method
Previous Article in Special Issue
Review of Implementation of Augmented Reality into the Georeferenced Analogue and Digital Maps and Images
Open AccessArticle

“Indirect” Information: The Debate on Testimony in Social Epistemology and Its Role in the Game of “Giving and Asking for Reasons”

Faculty of Philosophy, Pontifical Lateran University, Vatican City, 00120 Rome, Italy
Information 2019, 10(3), 101; https://doi.org/10.3390/info10030101
Received: 18 January 2019 / Revised: 21 February 2019 / Accepted: 1 March 2019 / Published: 7 March 2019
We will sketch the debate on testimony in social epistemology by reference to the contemporary debate on reductionism/anti-reductionism, communitarian epistemology and inferentialism. Testimony is a fundamental source of knowledge we share and it is worthy to be considered in the ambit of a dialogical perspective, which requires a description of a formal structure, which entails deontic statuses and deontic attitudes. In particular, we will argue for a social reformulation of the “space of reasons”, which establishes a fruitful relationship with the epistemological view of Wilfrid Sellars. View Full-Text
Keywords: testimony; justification; commitment; entitlement; speech act testimony; justification; commitment; entitlement; speech act
MDPI and ACS Style

Giovagnoli, R. “Indirect” Information: The Debate on Testimony in Social Epistemology and Its Role in the Game of “Giving and Asking for Reasons”. Information 2019, 10, 101.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop