Next Article in Journal
Fuad Nahdi, Q-News, and the Forging of British Islam: Some Personal Reflections
Next Article in Special Issue
Reassessing Religion and Politics in the Life of Jagjivan Rām
Previous Article in Journal
Correction: Zarzycka, B. et al. Religious Struggle and Psychological Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Religious Support and Meaning Making. Religions 2020, 11, 149
Previous Article in Special Issue
Catholic Mediation in the Basque Peace Process: Questioning the Transnational Dimension
Open AccessArticle

Religion and Peace—Anatomy of a Love–Hate Relationship

Ethics Center Institute for Social Ethics, Zürich University, Rämistrasse 71, 8006 Zürich, Switzerland
Violent Histories and Transgenerational Trauma Research, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602 Stellenbosch, South Africa
Religions 2020, 11(5), 219;
Received: 25 March 2020 / Revised: 17 April 2020 / Accepted: 23 April 2020 / Published: 29 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Peace, Politics, and Religion)
Human history is filled with numerous examples—both past and present—that make religion and violence appear to be best friends. Ever since the events surrounding 9/11, religiously inspired violence has been considered one of the most pressing issues of our times (cf. Juergensmeyer 2017; Kimball 2008). While the conflictive dimensions of religion are still indisputably at the forefront of public and political attention, religion’s significant resources for peace and reconciliation gain increasing attention as well. This contribution will provide an analysis of the love–hate relationship between religion and peace in three consecutive steps. The first part focuses on the role(s) of religion in conflict. Frazer and Owen’s six different ways of thinking about religion provide a model for better understanding religion’s conflictive sides (Frazer and Owen 2018; cf. Frazer and Friedli 2015). In a second step, this article discusses religion’s potent, yet often neglected constructive resources for sustainable peace. While taking into account the vast diversity of religious actors, certain content-based and formal characteristics emerge that help to shed light on the otherwise vague “religious factor” in peacebuilding. Finally, an example taken from post-genocide Rwanda will serve to illustrate the discussions in parts I and II. View Full-Text
Keywords: religion; peace; conflict; peacebuilding; FBO; conflict resolution; conflict analysis; development; post-genocide Rwanda; CARSA religion; peace; conflict; peacebuilding; FBO; conflict resolution; conflict analysis; development; post-genocide Rwanda; CARSA
MDPI and ACS Style

Schliesser, C. Religion and Peace—Anatomy of a Love–Hate Relationship. Religions 2020, 11, 219.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop