Use of Artificial Intelligence as a Problem Solution for Maritime Transport
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The paper requires significant proof reading and re-writing. There may be merit to the work presented by the authors but the use of the English make it impossible to follow or understand their work. I would recommend that they re-write the paper and have a native English speaker proof read and then resubmit
Author Response
Dear Reviewer,
We have made the requested corrections as instructed by all reviewers, proof read and re-write the article. We are submitting the revised article.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
It has been completed as a dissertation, however small mistakes in manuscript creation are scattered, so it is OK for acceptance the paper if they will be corrected.
Line 11: Mashine Learning --> Machine Learning is correct.
In Figure 1, 3st --> 3rd
2st --> 2nd
4st --> 4th
Line 129: At the end, a period (.) Is missing.
Line 134: (1) Move the formula number (1) to the right end.
Around lines 150-157: (1) The indentation may be wrong.
Lines 172 to 177: Expressions and sentences are mixed, making it a little difficult to understand. It may be better for readers to refer to the expression by its expression number separately or shorten each sentence?
The same applies to lines 181 to 185.
The same applies to lines 273-277.
The same applies to lines 282-288.
Line 189: Don't you need a formula number?
Line 226: Expression number (7) is shifted to the right end.
Line 245: Is a formula number unnecessary?
Line 248: . (Period) is missing.
Line 269: Expression number (8) is shifted to the right end.
Line 293: Is a formula number unnecessary?
Line 295: Expression number (9) is shifted to the right end.
Line 298: Expression number (10) is shifted to the right end.
Line 299: Expression number (11) is shifted to the right end.
Line 310: Runge-Kutt à Isn't Runge-Kutta correct?
Line 338: Isn't {pp.110-138} correct?
The same applies to lines 347 and 349.
Author Response
Dear Reviewer,
We have made the requested corrections as instructed by all reviewers, proof read and re-write the article. We are submitting the revised article.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
Major comments: information on what is what in formulas is missing in many cases. It is not shown where AI algorithms are used. Could you think about renaming? Conclusions should be expanded.
Minor comments: Arrow in Figure 1 should be moved in the right place. Line 39: a mistake in the family name. Line 42: instead of MK Gavurin should be M. K. Gavurin.Line 47: the same as in line 42 - GE Moiseenko. Line 106: Is it correct "..at the ports of the ports"? Line 110: Why Δ is constant for all ports? Line 154: there are errors in the formula statement, max sup must be at the same level as the equals sign.
Author Response
Dear Reviewer,
We have made the requested corrections as instructed by all reviewers, proof read and re-write the article. We are submitting the revised article.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
The authors have addressed my comments
