Next Article in Journal
Inversion of HF Radar Doppler Spectra Using a Neural Network
Previous Article in Journal
An Integrated Approach for the Assessment of Central Cooling Retrofit Using Variable Speed Drive Pump in Marine Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development of a Highly Flexible and High-Resolution Deep-Towed Streamer

1
Sonic Corporation, 1-18-2 Akebonocho, Tachikawa, Tokyo 190-0012, Japan
2
Geological Survey of Japan (GSJ), The National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8567, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2019, 7(8), 254; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7080254
Submission received: 22 June 2019 / Revised: 24 July 2019 / Accepted: 31 July 2019 / Published: 2 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Ocean Engineering)

Abstract

:
We have developed new a deep-towed seismic streamer for sub-bottom profiling. To obtain a high-resolution seismic signal, this streamer can be operated at depths of up to 2000 m, and state-of-the-art technology is adopted with electronics circuits, that can withstand high pressures of up to 22 MPa. The streamer houses an ultra-low noise pre-amplifier, micro-processor, AD convertor, high precision clock, gain controller, and other circuitry in an oil-filled vessel. The high S/N ratio gives us high-resolution seismic images. The streamer comprises several catenated single modules and the recorded acoustic data are transmitted to the control computer with the Ethernet protocol. This makes the length of the streamer cable, and the number of hydrophones, flexible. For instance, we can use both single-channel and multi-channel streamers in the same system. Up to 24-channels can be catenated.

1. Introduction

Multi-channel seismic reflection (MCS) surveys provide one of the most powerful and basic tools for imaging and analyzing the subsurface structure of the sea floor [1]. The MCS system records seismic signals reflected from the surface and subsurface of the bottom of the sea. The vertical and lateral resolutions of the seismic images of the subsurface structure depends largely on the sound source and streamer system. An air gun, boomer, or sparker is normally adopted as an artificial sound source, and the streamer functions as the data acquisition receiver. The vertical resolution is determined by the dominant frequency and bandwidth of the reflected signals [2], and it can be optimized using a high-frequency sound source. De-convolution allows the vertical resolution to be optimized by increasing the bandwidth. The lateral resolution is determined by the size of the Fresnel zone [3], which depends on the dominant frequency of the sound source and the positional relationships among the sound source, the receiver and the reflector, and the sound velocity. If we want to obtain a high-resolution image, the sound source and streamers should be positioned near the sea bottom, as recommended by Bowen [4,5]. Thus high-resolution seismic images of the subsurface, including shallow sediments in a deep-sea environment, cannot be achieved with the conventional near-surface streamer system. To solve the problem by obtaining high-resolution seismic images, a new deep-towed MCS streamer has been developed by Sonic Corporation and the Geological Survey of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology. This study describes the new deep-towed MCS streamer cable in detail.

2. System Overview

The newly developed, deep-towed streamer comprises a data control module, battery module, and multiple, individual, independent acoustic modules, that can be catenated. The number of acoustic modules that can be catenated range from one (single-channel streamer) to 128 (multi-channel streamer), in theory, through data transmission using an Ethernet hub, while, in practice, this is limited to 24 modules. The distance between acoustic modules is flexible and can be set by changing the length of the connection cable. Thus, the operator can determine the number of acoustic modules, and the distance between acoustic modules, to suit the measurement conditions. Figure 1 and Figure 2 show a block diagram of a first trial system with 12 acoustic modules (12-channel streamer) that can monitor a reflected signal in real time using Ethernet protocol.
This system comprises three parts: The air gun control, monitoring and power supply, and the signal detection part. The air gun control part comprises a chip scale atomic clock (CSAC) with a global positioning system (GPS) signal receiver, an air gun controller that functions as a GPS emulator, and an air gun. The monitoring and power supply part includes, a personal computer (PC) to compile a measurement condition table (which includes the gunshot timing and its intervals communicated from the air gun control part), the signal gain, and the coefficient of the band pass filter for noise reduction. The PC monitors all the seismic data that are stored in the data control module as multiplexed data. In this system, the DC power supply is 14.5 V DC at 3 A. The signal detection part comprises the deep-towed frame and multiple acoustic modules, as shown in Figure 1. In case using an off-line deep-towed frame, seismic signal and depth value are stored in the Data Control Module. In our system, a 2400 DT-2 (EdgeTech, West Wareham, MA, USA) is adopted for the deep-towed frame. The deep-towed frame comprises a battery module, a data control module, a fiber optic multiplexer, and other instruments, such as side scan sonar, including, a position and depth sensor, where the readings are telemetered to the ship in real time. The signal detection part comprises a number of single acoustic modules (multi-channel streamer). The data control module and all the single acoustic modules are connected by an Ethernet/power cable. A sea anchor is fixed to the end of the streamer line to maintain tension on the line.

3. Description of the Modules

This section describes the three newly developed main modules. Figure 3 shows a block diagram of the data control module and acoustic module.

3.1. Data Control Module

The data control module comprises a pressure sensor for detecting the water depth, the CSAC for managing the time interval and the time stamp written with the acquisition data, 2 terabytes of storage (SSD), and computer boards in the pressure vessel for the overall control of the streamer cable and Ethernet hub. The computer motherboard is a VX-6050 with an Intel Atom processor (INNOTECH Corp., Yokohama, Japan).
The CPU motherboard, which runs Linux, controls data acquisition, data storage, measurement time, and measurement conditions. An SA.45sCSAC option 003 (Microsemi Corp., Aliso Viejo, CA, USA) is adopted for the atomic clock. The GPS emulator, formed by the atomic clock and another small CPU, can be linked to GNSS time before system deployment. Time management is executed by this time emulator.
The small CPU also receives pressure data from the pressure gauge, that is installed in the data control module, which is then converted to depth values. For pressure measurements, a high precision Precise line pressure gauge (Keller America, Newport News, VA, USA) with a measurement range of 0–50 MPa ± 0.1% full scale is adopted. The gauge outputs a 0–5 V signal that corresponds to the pressure range and this is converted to a digital signal by a 16-bit ADC. Time-stamped hydrophone raw data from the acoustic module are stored in the 2-terabyte SSD. Figure 4 shows an external view of the data control module. The titanium high pressure vessel (a diameter of 177 mm and a length 435 mm) is designed to withstand 50 MPa and is pressure-tested up to 22 MPa.

3.2. Acoustic Module

The single acoustic module contains dual hydrophones to increase the directionality and sensitivity, a servo-controlled pre-amplifier, with a signal gain of 26 dB, a program-controlled gain amplifier with a signal gain selectable between 0 dB and 40 dB, an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) with 24-bit resolution, a microcomputer with 1 GB of memory, and a SW Hub/USB-LAN adapter in an oil-filled vessel. The hydrophones are AQ-4 (Teledyne Benthos, North Falmouth, MA, USA). The preamplifier contains a high-pass filter with a stop-band frequency of 5 Hz and an attenuation of −20 dB to reject low-frequency noise generated by fluctuations in the water pressure on the streamer cable. This noise can cause baseline fluctuations that can push the signal over the range of the preamplifier, which will clip it and give a zero output.
The microcomputer an Intel Edison runs Linux, manages data acquisition, the window range and damping rate of the digital noise filter (FIR), the signal amplification level and communication control between the data control module and other units. Each acoustic module has an Ethernet address that can be used to identify the position of each single streamer in the multi-channel streamer cable and its data. As the acoustic module is in an oil-filled vessel, all electronic components are immersed in silicon oil and can withstand pressures up to 22 MPa. To obtain a high-pressure resistance for the electronic modules, electronic components, mounted on the circuit boards that were not resistant to high pressures, were treated with a special anti-pressure fabrication. The advantage of this configuration is that it makes the line length of the analog signal from the hydrophone (AD-4) to the preamplifier as short as possible, allowing the analog signal to be converted to a digital signal as soon as possible, thus contributing to an ultra-low noise acoustic detector. The primary gain of the preamplifier is 26 dB and this is controlled by the gain control amplifier via control software.
Figure 5 shows a schematic diagram of a single acoustic module. The overall length is 985 mm and the maximum diameter is 142 mm. The length of the main module is 495 mm and the diameter is 73 mm. The weight is 7.5 kg in air and 3.7 kg in sea water. Figure 6 shows a perspective drawing of the single acoustic module. The front and rear sections of this module are enclosed in buoyancy materials.
Figure 7 shows the acoustic module without its buoyancy materials. The outer tube of the main module is made of urethane resin (OCC Corp, Yokohama, Japan) filled with silicon oil (KF96L-0.65CS, Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) to propagate the signal to the hydrophone. Both ends of the acoustic module have eyebolts for catenating and Ethernet/power connectors. This module can operate in deep water up to a pressure of 22 MPa. Figure 8 shows the preliminary setup work on the ship before deployment.

3.3. Battery Module

The titanium battery module, which is designed to allow offline operation, contains a 35-Ah battery in a pressure vessel. It has a diameter of 267 mm, a length 355 mm. and weighs 45 kg in air and 19 kg in sea water. Battery modules can be catenated to increase capacity and can accept an external electrical input. The battery cell is a lithium ion battery (ALM 12V35, NEC Energy Solutions, Westborough, MA, USA). The pressure vessel is tested up to 22 MPa and designed to withstand up to 50 MPa. Two battery modules, installed in a deep-towed frame, will allow 44 h of continuous operation for a streamer cable with 12 catenated acoustic modules. Figure 9 shows an external view of battery module.

4. Specifications

⟡ Frequency response5 Hz to 15 kHz
⟡ Sensitivity−201 dBV re 1 µPa
⟡ Depth−2200 m
⟡ Distance between acoustic modulesFlexible
⟡ Number of acoustic modulesFlexible, normally 12, with a min of 1 and a max of 24
⟡ Operating time44 h with two battery modules and 12 acoustic modules with a 14.5 V DC 3 A power supply.
If a 14.5 V DC 5 A power supply is available, no restrictions on operating time.
⟡ Time managementAtomic clock with GPS signal receiver
⟡ Amplifier gain26 dB to 66 dB in 8 steps
⟡ Resolution power1.2 µPa in theory

5. Test Data

The system was tested in the deep sea to a water depth of more than 1000 m, which is located on the slope of the Suruga Trough. Figure 10 shows an example of a reflection image obtained by this system.
For these data, the depth of the sea bottom is about 1350 m, and towing depth of the streamer is about 600 m. The sound source that was used was a mini-GI gun system (Sercel Inc., Houston, TX, USA), and the volume of both the generator and the injector were 491.6 cm3. Figure 10 shows that the comparison of the reflection images, obtained by this new system, with the existing surface-towed cable. Processing the deep-towed data was carried out using depth correction, 30 to 200 Hz band-pass filtering, gain control, deconvolution, and brute stacking. The surface-towed 16-channel data was performed using common-midpoint (CMP) sorting, bandpass filtering, gain control, deconvolution, normal move out (NMO), and CMP stacking. Even in the slope area, the surface-towed streamer recorded the arrival of the sound source and assumed that the reflection came from straight below. As a result, the surface strong reflector will appear less steep and shallower shows as noise reflection below the sea bottom surface. Our new deep-towed data are less effected by displacements in position. The subsurface stratified sediments are much clear in the reflection images obtained by new system [6].

6. Summary

We have developed a new deep-towed streamer, that allows a multi-channel streamer to be configured by catenating a flexible number (up to 24) of single acoustic module physically and electrically, and with a flexible distance between each channel. These deep-towed multi-channel streamers can withstand pressures of up to 22 MPa. Single multi-channel streamers can be connected together in an Ethernet network to obtain real-time seismic data. The electrical components in the devices that acquire seismic data in the acoustic module are immersed in silicon oil to withstand high pressures, with the electrical components in the main devices treated with a special anti-pressure fabrication. This shortens the analog signal line length and gives a good S/N ratio.
The system was tested in the deep sea and high-resolution seismic data were obtained.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.Y., K.H., T.I., and K.A.; methodology, K.H.; software, T.Y.; investigation, T.I.; data curation, T.I. and K.A.; writing—original draft preparation, T.Y. and K.H.; writing—review and editing, K.A.; project administration, K.A.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

This work benefited from the invaluable support of Manabu Matsumoto (Gazougiken Co. Ltd.) in the development of the control software for the system. We thank Michael Luetchford, BTech, from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/as) for editing the English text of a draft of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wood, W.; Gettrust, J.F.; Spychalski, S. A new deep-towed, multi-channel seismic system. Sea Technol. 2003, 44, 44–49. [Google Scholar]
  2. Chapman, N.R.; Gettrust, J.F.; Walia, R.; Hannay, D.; Spence, G.T.; Wood, W.T.; Hyndman, R.D. High Resolution deep-towed multichannel seismic survey of deep sea gas hydrates off western Canada. Geophysics 2002, 67, 1038–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lindsey, J. The Fresnel zone and its interpretative significance. Lead. Edge 1989, 8, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bowen, A.N. A High-Resolution Seismic Profiling System using a Deep-Towed Horizontal Hydrophone Streamer. Mar. Geophys. Res. 1984, 6, 275–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nouze, H.; Sibuet, J.C.; Savoye, B.; Marsset, B.; Thomas, Y. Pasisar: Performances of a high and very high resolution hybrid deep-towed seismic device. Mar. Geophys. Res. 1997, 19, 379–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Inoue, T.; Arai, K.; Yokoyama, S.; Murakami, F.; Nishimura, K.; Yamazu, T.; Haragushi, K. OS13D-1530: High-resolution geological structure in deep sea area obtained by new developing deep towing multi-channel streamer system. In Proceedings of the AGU Fall Meeting, Washington, DC, USA, 10–14 December 2018. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Block diagram of the deep-towed streamer.
Figure 1. Block diagram of the deep-towed streamer.
Jmse 07 00254 g001
Figure 2. Survey image of a new deep-towed 12-channel trial system, with a surface-towed sound source and existing 16-channel streamer.
Figure 2. Survey image of a new deep-towed 12-channel trial system, with a surface-towed sound source and existing 16-channel streamer.
Jmse 07 00254 g002
Figure 3. Block diagram of the main modules in this system. Eth: Ethernet, SW Hub: Switching Hub, UW: Under Water.
Figure 3. Block diagram of the main modules in this system. Eth: Ethernet, SW Hub: Switching Hub, UW: Under Water.
Jmse 07 00254 g003
Figure 4. Data control module.
Figure 4. Data control module.
Jmse 07 00254 g004
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of the single acoustic module.
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of the single acoustic module.
Jmse 07 00254 g005
Figure 6. Perspective drawing of the single acoustic module.
Figure 6. Perspective drawing of the single acoustic module.
Jmse 07 00254 g006
Figure 7. Photograph of an acoustic module without the buoyancy materials.
Figure 7. Photograph of an acoustic module without the buoyancy materials.
Jmse 07 00254 g007
Figure 8. Photograph of 12 catenated acoustic modules with buoyancy materials being prepared for deployment on the ship.
Figure 8. Photograph of 12 catenated acoustic modules with buoyancy materials being prepared for deployment on the ship.
Jmse 07 00254 g008
Figure 9. External view of the battery module.
Figure 9. External view of the battery module.
Jmse 07 00254 g009
Figure 10. Comparison of the reflection images obtained by new system with surface-towed cable, which is same scaled profiles.
Figure 10. Comparison of the reflection images obtained by new system with surface-towed cable, which is same scaled profiles.
Jmse 07 00254 g010

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yamazu, T.; Haraguchi, K.; Inoue, T.; Arai, K. Development of a Highly Flexible and High-Resolution Deep-Towed Streamer. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2019, 7, 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7080254

AMA Style

Yamazu T, Haraguchi K, Inoue T, Arai K. Development of a Highly Flexible and High-Resolution Deep-Towed Streamer. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2019; 7(8):254. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7080254

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yamazu, Toshio, Koshi Haraguchi, Takahiko Inoue, and Kohsaku Arai. 2019. "Development of a Highly Flexible and High-Resolution Deep-Towed Streamer" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 7, no. 8: 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7080254

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop