Next Article in Journal
Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing: Positive Feedbacks
Next Article in Special Issue
Storm Surge Propagation and Flooding in Small Tidal Rivers during Events of Mixed Coastal and Fluvial Influence
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Sediment Transport Model Including Short-Lived Radioisotopes: Model Description and Idealized Test Cases
Article Menu
Issue 4 (December) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2018, 6(4), 145; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse6040145

An Assessment of Two Models of Wave Propagation in an Estuary Protected by Breakwaters

Department of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut, Groton, CT 06340, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 26 July 2018 / Revised: 6 October 2018 / Accepted: 23 November 2018 / Published: 27 November 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [7052 KB, uploaded 29 November 2018]   |  

Abstract

Breakwaters influence coastal wave climate and circulation by blocking and dissipating wave energy. In a large harbor, these effects are combined with wave generation, refraction and reflection. Accurate representation of these processes is essential to the determination of coastal circulation and wave processes. MIKE21SW and SWAN are two third-generation spectral wave models which are used widely in coastal research and engineering applications. Recently improved versions of the models are able to consider the influence of breakwater structures. In this study, we used available observations to evaluate the accuracy of model simulations of waves in New Haven Harbor, Connecticut, USA, an estuary with three detached breakwaters near the mouth. The models were executed on their optimum unstructured triangular grid. The boundary conditions were derived from a bottom mounted Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers (ADCP) on the offshore side of the breakwaters. Wind forcing was applied using data from the Central Long Island Sound buoy. We found that both models were largely consistent with observations during storms. However, MIKE21SW predicted some of storm peaks slightly better. SWAN required the finer grid to achieve the optimum condition, but as it uses a fast, fully implicit algorithm, the computational times were similar. Also, the sensitivity analysis represents that wind forcing and the breakwaters have significant impact on the results. View Full-Text
Keywords: wave hindcast; breakwater; harbor; estuary; SWAN; MIKE21SW; unstructured grid wave hindcast; breakwater; harbor; estuary; SWAN; MIKE21SW; unstructured grid
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Ilia, A.; O'Donnell, J. An Assessment of Two Models of Wave Propagation in an Estuary Protected by Breakwaters. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2018, 6, 145.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. EISSN 2077-1312 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top