Next Article in Journal
Enhanced Resting Cyst Production in Harmful Dinoflagellate Akashiwo sanguinea Amended with Taebaek Coal Powder
Next Article in Special Issue
Numerical Prediction of Cold Plasma Electrostatic Precipitation in Corrugated Marine Exhaust Ducts
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis and Evaluation of the Impact of Sea-Level Rise on Storm Surges in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area
Previous Article in Special Issue
Integrated Evaluation of Ship Performance and Emission Reduction in Solid Oxide Fuel Cell–Based Hybrid Marine Systems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Analysis of Performance and Emissions of a Two-Stroke Marine Diesel Engine According to CPP Modes

Training Ship Baek-Kyung, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2026, 14(4), 331; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14040331
Submission received: 2 January 2026 / Revised: 4 February 2026 / Accepted: 5 February 2026 / Published: 9 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ship Performance and Emission Prediction)

Abstract

This study experimentally investigates the performance and exhaust emission characteristics of a low-speed two-stroke marine diesel engine operated with different controllable pitch propeller (CPP) modes during actual sea operation. Full-scale measurements were conducted on the training vessel T/S Baek-Kyung, equipped with a MAN B&W 5S35ME-B9.5 engine, operating under IMO Tier II fallback (FB) conditions. Two CPP control strategies were compared: a constant-speed mode, in which engine speed was maintained at approximately 162 rpm and load was controlled by propeller pitch, and a combinator mode, in which engine speed and pitch were jointly controlled. In the combinator mode, the propeller pitch reached saturation (100%) at approximately 25% load, and further load variation was governed primarily by engine speed. The analysis focused on an engine-load range of approximately 25–75% SMCR and evaluated propulsion performance, including specific fuel oil consumption (SFOC) and shaft torque, together with estimated brake-specific exhaust emissions expressed in g/kWh. The combinator mode achieved superior fuel efficiency under partial-load conditions, reducing SFOC by up to 10.5 g/kWh (5.4%) at 25% load, while increasing shaft torque by up to 47%, indicating improved engine–propeller matching. However, this benefit was accompanied by higher estimated emissions at low load, with BSNOx increasing from 13.61 to 16.95 g/kWh. As engine load increased, differences in both performance and emissions between the two modes diminished. These results reveal a clear load-dependent trade-off between fuel efficiency and exhaust emissions in CPP operation and emphasize the importance of load-based switching or optimal joint control strategies under off-design conditions.
Keywords: controllable pitch propeller; two-stroke marine diesel engine; fuel efficiency; performance; emission controllable pitch propeller; two-stroke marine diesel engine; fuel efficiency; performance; emission

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moon, J. Comparative Analysis of Performance and Emissions of a Two-Stroke Marine Diesel Engine According to CPP Modes. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2026, 14, 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14040331

AMA Style

Moon J. Comparative Analysis of Performance and Emissions of a Two-Stroke Marine Diesel Engine According to CPP Modes. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2026; 14(4):331. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14040331

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moon, Jaesung. 2026. "Comparative Analysis of Performance and Emissions of a Two-Stroke Marine Diesel Engine According to CPP Modes" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 14, no. 4: 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14040331

APA Style

Moon, J. (2026). Comparative Analysis of Performance and Emissions of a Two-Stroke Marine Diesel Engine According to CPP Modes. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 14(4), 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14040331

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop