Next Article in Journal
Research on Simulation Optimization of ART Charging Strategies in Automated Container Terminals
Previous Article in Journal
Bending Hysteresis of an Unbonded Flexible Pipe Considering Thermally Induced Interlayer Contact Pressure
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Multi-Array Constrained 50 mHz Rayleigh-Wave Microseism Sources: Global Distribution and Ocean–Solid Earth Coupling

School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266500, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2026, 14(13), 1182; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14131182 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 29 May 2026 / Revised: 22 June 2026 / Accepted: 25 June 2026 / Published: 27 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Geological Oceanography)

Abstract

Microseisms, as the most energetic component of the Earth’s background noise field, represent a forefront area of research where precise location of their sources is paramount. This study systematically investigates the spatiotemporal characteristics of 50 mHz Rayleigh wave microseisms using the dense Shandong array deployed in eastern China, through beamforming and a multi-array combined analysis. The results reveal that the incident direction of the Rayleigh waves exhibits distinct temporal and seasonal variations, primarily originating from four back-azimuth sectors. To further constrain the source regions, we integrate background noise data from the Alaska array and the Venezuela array (supplemented by the Indonesia array). The multi-array product back-projection, by cross-constraining back-azimuths from geographically separated arrays, mitigates the inherent ambiguity of single-array analyses and enables robust global source localization. This approach not only improves the reliability of source attribution but also demonstrates the potential of using microseismic noise as a passive tool for monitoring ocean wave activity and investigating solid-Earth structure. The combined analysis identifies four microseism source regions (M1–M4): the Bering Sea–Gulf of Alaska–Aleutian Islands, the central South Pacific, the southwestern Indian Ocean off southern Africa, and the northeastern North Atlantic–Northern Europe. These source regions fundamentally correspond to areas of elevated significant wave height, confirming the coupled ocean–solid Earth excitation mechanism. These findings provide a methodological basis for future applications of multi-array microseismic monitoring in ocean-climate studies and seismic imaging.
Keywords: Shandong province; microseisms; Rayleigh wave; multiple seismic arrays; beamforming; ambient seismic noise; source localization Shandong province; microseisms; Rayleigh wave; multiple seismic arrays; beamforming; ambient seismic noise; source localization

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xue, H.; Huang, J.; Chen, F. Multi-Array Constrained 50 mHz Rayleigh-Wave Microseism Sources: Global Distribution and Ocean–Solid Earth Coupling. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2026, 14, 1182. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14131182

AMA Style

Xue H, Huang J, Chen F. Multi-Array Constrained 50 mHz Rayleigh-Wave Microseism Sources: Global Distribution and Ocean–Solid Earth Coupling. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2026; 14(13):1182. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14131182

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xue, Haimeng, Jianping Huang, and Feiyu Chen. 2026. "Multi-Array Constrained 50 mHz Rayleigh-Wave Microseism Sources: Global Distribution and Ocean–Solid Earth Coupling" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 14, no. 13: 1182. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14131182

APA Style

Xue, H., Huang, J., & Chen, F. (2026). Multi-Array Constrained 50 mHz Rayleigh-Wave Microseism Sources: Global Distribution and Ocean–Solid Earth Coupling. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 14(13), 1182. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14131182

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop