Author Contributions
Conceptualization, W.G., H.W. and Y.S.; methodology, W.G. and H.W.; software, W.G. and H.W.; validation, W.G., H.W. and Y.S.; formal analysis, W.G. and H.W.; investigation, W.G. and W.X.; resources, W.G. and H.W.; data curation, W.G., H.W., W.X. and Y.G.; writing—original draft preparation, W.G.; writing—review and editing, W.G., H.W. and Y.S.; visualization, W.G. and H.W.; supervision, H.W. and Y.S.; project administration, W.G. and H.W.; funding acquisition, W.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Figure 1.
Location and morphology of the DD Guyot, and the dive trajectories of the manned submersible Jiaolong.
Figure 1.
Location and morphology of the DD Guyot, and the dive trajectories of the manned submersible Jiaolong.
Figure 2.
CNN-based DD Guyot substratum type classification pipeline.
Figure 2.
CNN-based DD Guyot substratum type classification pipeline.
Figure 3.
Sediment distribution characteristics along the trajectory of manned submersibles.
Figure 3.
Sediment distribution characteristics along the trajectory of manned submersibles.
Figure 4.
Sediment distribution characteristics along the D300 trajectory line, along with corresponding depth and slope values. (a) Location and video image; (b) depth and slope profile.
Figure 4.
Sediment distribution characteristics along the D300 trajectory line, along with corresponding depth and slope values. (a) Location and video image; (b) depth and slope profile.
Figure 5.
Sediment distribution characteristics along the D301 trajectory line, along with corresponding depth and slope values. (a) Location and video image; (b) depth and slope profile.
Figure 5.
Sediment distribution characteristics along the D301 trajectory line, along with corresponding depth and slope values. (a) Location and video image; (b) depth and slope profile.
Figure 6.
Sediment distribution characteristics along the D302 trajectory line, along with corresponding depth and slope values. (a) Location and video image; (b) depth and slope profile.
Figure 6.
Sediment distribution characteristics along the D302 trajectory line, along with corresponding depth and slope values. (a) Location and video image; (b) depth and slope profile.
Figure 7.
Sediment distribution characteristics along the D303 trajectory line, along with corresponding depth and slope values. (a) Location and video image; (b) depth and slope profile.
Figure 7.
Sediment distribution characteristics along the D303 trajectory line, along with corresponding depth and slope values. (a) Location and video image; (b) depth and slope profile.
Figure 8.
CNN-based classification results for seafloor substratum types in the DD Guyot.
Figure 8.
CNN-based classification results for seafloor substratum types in the DD Guyot.
Figure 9.
Common benthic organisms seen by the Jiaolong submersible: (a) coral, (b) sponge, (c) sea lily, (d) brittle star on dead sponge, (e) decapod shrimp, and (f) squat lobster.
Figure 9.
Common benthic organisms seen by the Jiaolong submersible: (a) coral, (b) sponge, (c) sea lily, (d) brittle star on dead sponge, (e) decapod shrimp, and (f) squat lobster.
Figure 10.
Results of the geomorphologic classification of the DD Guyot. The figure depicts two typical landslides and marks 21 typical gullies.
Figure 10.
Results of the geomorphologic classification of the DD Guyot. The figure depicts two typical landslides and marks 21 typical gullies.
Figure 11.
Location of Landslide A, Landslide B, and their cross-sections AB, CD, EF, and GH. Among them, (a) represents the Landslide A area, and (b) represents the Landslide B area.
Figure 11.
Location of Landslide A, Landslide B, and their cross-sections AB, CD, EF, and GH. Among them, (a) represents the Landslide A area, and (b) represents the Landslide B area.
Figure 12.
Depth profile of lines (
a) AB, (
b) CD, (
c) EF, and (
d) GH from
Figure 11. Profile lines indicate different substratum types with distinct colors: red for exposed bedrock, green for thinly sedimented bedrock, light blue for the sediment–rock transition zone, and dark blue for continuous sediment. Light brown indicates the guyot.
Figure 12.
Depth profile of lines (
a) AB, (
b) CD, (
c) EF, and (
d) GH from
Figure 11. Profile lines indicate different substratum types with distinct colors: red for exposed bedrock, green for thinly sedimented bedrock, light blue for the sediment–rock transition zone, and dark blue for continuous sediment. Light brown indicates the guyot.
Table 1.
Jiaolong manned submersible survey line information.
Table 1.
Jiaolong manned submersible survey line information.
Dive | Location | Length (m) | Maximum Depth (m) |
---|
D300 | Southwestern edge of the summit platform and the ridge | 3258 | 1998 |
D301 | Eastern flank | 2629 | 3032 |
D302 | Eastern part of the summit platform and the eastern flank | 3251 | 2087 |
D303 | Northwest edge of the summit platform and the ridge | 3291 | 2044 |
Table 2.
Summary of predictor variables derived from MBES data (total: 18 dimensions).
Table 2.
Summary of predictor variables derived from MBES data (total: 18 dimensions).
Feature Category | Feature | Description |
---|
Depth | Depth | Elevation. |
Slope | Slope | The degree of inclination of a local surface slope. |
Topographic relief | Topographic relief | The difference between the highest point and the lowest point within a specific area. |
Backscatter intensity | Backscatter intensity | The intensity of energy reflected back from the seafloor in response to multibeam pulse signals. |
GLCM | Mean | The average level of grayscale values corresponding to each row (column) of the GLCM. |
Variance (Var) | Degree of dispersion in the gray distribution. |
Homogeneity (Hom) | Similarity of gray levels between adjacent pixels. |
Contrast (Con) | Magnitude of gray-level transitions. |
Dissimilarity (Dis) | Average intensity of grayscale differences. |
Entropy (Ent) | Measurement of texture feature complexity. |
Angular Second Moment (ASM) | The stability of texture grayscale variations. |
Correlation (Cor) | Linear correlation between row- and column-wise gray levels. |
Laws | | Construct a two-dimensional convolution kernel using the outer product of two one-dimensional filters to compute the local response energy, thereby reflecting texture features in the pixel domain.
represent level, edge, spot, wave, and ripple, respectively. |
|
|
|
Gabor | 0° | The short-time Fourier transform localized using Gaussian windows can extract structures with specific scales and orientations. The direction angle determines the filter’s selectivity toward textures oriented in a specific direction. |
45° |
Table 3.
Substratum type, primarily classified based on sediment cover.
Table 3.
Substratum type, primarily classified based on sediment cover.
Type | Description | Sediment Cover |
---|
Exposed bedrock | Continuously distributed bedrock, with cobalt-rich crusts developed in some areas; rough surface, with minimal or absent sediment cover. | Very low |
Thinly sedimented bedrock | Continuously distributed bedrock, with surfaces often developed with cobalt-rich crusts, overlain by thin sedimentary deposits. | Low |
Sediment–rock transition zone | Composed of a mixture of nodules, gravelly crusts, cobbles, and sediments, exhibiting spatial mosaicism and high heterogeneity. | High |
Continuous sediment | Continuously distributed sediments with a relatively flat surface, showing ripple marks in places. | Very high |
Table 4.
Number of substratum types used for the training set and validation set.
Table 4.
Number of substratum types used for the training set and validation set.
Type | Total Number | Training Set Number | Validation Set Number |
---|
Exposed bedrock | 6564 | 5251 | 1313 |
Thinly sedimented bedrock | 1300 | 1040 | 260 |
Sediment–rock transition zone | 572 | 457 | 115 |
Continuous sediment | 1446 | 1157 | 289 |
Table 5.
Confusion matrix and accuracy evaluation of the CNN. The table includes precision, recall, overall accuracy (OA), and kappa coefficient for exposed bedrock (EB), thinly sedimented bedrock (TSB), sediment–rock transition zone (SRT), and continuous sediment (CS).
Table 5.
Confusion matrix and accuracy evaluation of the CNN. The table includes precision, recall, overall accuracy (OA), and kappa coefficient for exposed bedrock (EB), thinly sedimented bedrock (TSB), sediment–rock transition zone (SRT), and continuous sediment (CS).
Type | EB | TSB | SRT | CS | Recall (%) | OA (%) | Kappa |
---|
EB | 1281 | 31 | 0 | 1 | 97.56 | 95.60 | 0.92 |
TSB | 11 | 232 | 10 | 7 | 89.23 |
SRT | 0 | 1 | 107 | 7 | 93.04 |
CS | 0 | 0 | 19 | 270 | 93.43 |
Precision(%) | 99.15 | 87.88 | 78.68 | 94.74 | |
Table 6.
Comparison of substratum type classification performance among different models.
Table 6.
Comparison of substratum type classification performance among different models.
Model | OA (%) | Kappa |
---|
RF | 92.77 | 0.86 |
SVM | 83.16 | 0.63 |
AdaBoost | 68.13 | 0.50 |
MLP | 89.02 | 0.79 |
Table 7.
The area, depth, and slope of different substratum types in the DD Guyot.
Table 7.
The area, depth, and slope of different substratum types in the DD Guyot.
Type | Area (km2) | Area (%) | Mean Depth (m) | Mean Slope (°) |
---|
Exposed bedrock | 176.02 | 8.76% | 2667.33 | 20.38 |
Thinly sedimented bedrock | 280.07 | 13.93% | 3524.89 | 21.06 |
Sediment–rock transition zone | 34.01 | 1.69% | 2573.12 | 27.80 |
Continuous sediment | 1520.32 | 75.62% | 5023.09 | 11.23 |
Table 8.
The area, depth, and slope of the summit platform.
Table 8.
The area, depth, and slope of the summit platform.
Type | Area (km2) | Area (%) | Mean Depth (m) | Mean Slope (°) |
---|
Exposed bedrock | 23.15 | 92.23% | 1081.74 | 2.56 |
Thinly sedimented bedrock | 1.95 | 7.77% | 1071.13 | 2.19 |
Table 9.
The area, depth, and slope of the gully on the slope.
Table 9.
The area, depth, and slope of the gully on the slope.
Type | Area (km2) | Area (%) | Mean Depth (m) | Mean Slope (°) |
---|
Exposed bedrock | 7.16 | 15.07% | 2774.88 | 24.77 |
Thinly sedimented bedrock | 19.61 | 41.27% | 3378.27 | 21.52 |
Sediment–rock transition zone | 2.59 | 5.45% | 2482.25 | 17.67 |
Continuous sediment | 18.16 | 38.22% | 3625.36 | 20.87 |
Table 10.
Detailed descriptions of the morphology and sedimentary characteristics of gullies.
Table 10.
Detailed descriptions of the morphology and sedimentary characteristics of gullies.
Number | Trend | Length (m) | Width (m) | Mean Slope (°) | Sedimentary Features |
---|
1 | E | 4703 | 729 | 23.52 | Mainly continuous sediment, no exposed bedrock. |
2 | E | 2672 | 400 | 29.79 | All four types are present, with sediment cover increasing from top to bottom. |
3 | ESE | 5509 | 310 | 26.01 | All four types are present, with sediment cover increasing from top to bottom. |
4 | ESE | 2445 | 374 | 26.57 | All four types are present, with sediment cover increasing from top to bottom. |
5 | SE | 2860 | 297 | 23.77 | All four types are present, with sediment cover increasing from top to bottom. |
6 | NNW | 3601 | 224 | 21.31 | No sediment–rock transition zone; sediment cover increases from top to bottom. |
7 | N | 2273 | 154 | 20.49 | No exposed bedrock; sediment cover increases from top to bottom. |
8 | NNW | 5527 | 301 | 26.62 | No sediment–rock transition zone; sediment cover increases from top to bottom. |
9 | NW | 2740 | 451 | 37.71 | Mainly exposed bedrock, with a small amount of thinly sedimented bedrock. |
10 | NNE | 2901 | 624 | 28.21 | No sediment–rock transition zone; sediment cover increases from top to bottom. |
11 | NW | 2174 | 340 | 29.15 | All four types are present, with sediment cover increasing from top to bottom. |
12 | WNW | 2750 | 416 | 28.12 | All four types are present, with sediment cover increasing from top to bottom. |
13 | WNW | 1909 | 395 | 26.64 | Continuous sediment dominates the landscape, with no exposed bedrock. |
14 | SSW | 3692 | 235 | 22.77 | All four types are present, with sediment cover increasing from top to bottom. |
15 | S | 3378 | 397 | 23.79 | All four types are present, with sediment cover decreasing from top to bottom. |
16 | S | 4357 | 618 | 30.42 | All four types are present, with sediment cover increasing from top to bottom. |
17 | S | 3977 | 456 | 23.10 | All four types are present, with sediment cover increasing from top to bottom. |
18 | SSW | 1649 | 173 | 25.49 | All four types are present, with sediment cover increasing from top to bottom. Continuous sediment accounts for a smaller proportion. |
19 | WSW | 3113 | 353 | 29.82 | Mainly thinly sedimented bedrock. |
20 | SW | 2393 | 365 | 23.89 | Mainly thinly sedimented bedrock, no sediment–rock transition zone. |
21 | SSW | 2989 | 521 | 25.51 | Mainly thinly sedimented bedrock. |
Table 11.
The area, depth, and slope of the other areas of the flank and the seafloor plain. Type of exposed bedrock (EB), thinly sedimented bedrock (TSB), sediment–rock transition zone (SRT), and continuous sediment (CS).
Table 11.
The area, depth, and slope of the other areas of the flank and the seafloor plain. Type of exposed bedrock (EB), thinly sedimented bedrock (TSB), sediment–rock transition zone (SRT), and continuous sediment (CS).
Landform | Mean Depth (m) | Mean Slope (°) | Type | Area (km2) | Area (%) | Mean Depth (m) | Mean Slope (°) |
---|
Extremely steep slope | 3485.88 | 31.48 | EB | 58.79 | 20.69% | 2589.97 | 33.05 |
TSB | 82.52 | 29.04% | 3181.37 | 30.52 |
SRT | 18.85 | 6.63% | 2623.54 | 31.22 |
CS | 124.01 | 43.64% | 4297.63 | 28.99 |
Steep slope | 4130.57 | 19.68 | EB | 38.06 | 9.10% | 3013.18 | 20.81 |
TSB | 91.85 | 21.95% | 3575.58 | 20.21 |
SRT | 1.03 | 0.25% | 2447.32 | 22.40 |
CS | 287.43 | 68.70% | 4530.38 | 19.23 |
Gentle slope | 4808.42 | 9.64 | EB | 34.68 | 4.93% | 2859.45 | 10.19 |
TSB | 62.58 | 8.90% | 3868.25 | 11.24 |
SRT | 1.13 | 0.16% | 2247.66 | 14.60 |
CS | 604.79 | 86.01% | 5023.05 | 9.60 |
Very gentle slope | 5492.92 | 2.83 | EB | 8.09 | 1.87% | 4663.10 | 3.76 |
TSB | 12.27 | 2.84% | 4383.88 | 4.10 |
SRT | 0.05 | 0.01% | 2115.82 | 6.22 |
CS | 411.79 | 95.28% | 5545.21 | 2.97 |
Seafloor plain | 5872.68 | 1.44 | TSB | 0.03 | 0.07% | 5863.64 | 1.62 |
CS | 44.18 | 99.93% | 5874.17 | 1.47 |