Enhancing the Sealing Performance of Bolted Ball Joints by Gaskets: Numerical Simulation and Experiment
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Ideas and Structural Design
3. Numerical Simulation
3.1. Guidelines for Sealing Evaluation
3.2. The Numerical Model
3.2.1. Geometric Modeling
3.2.2. Material Constitutive Relationship
3.2.3. Meshing
3.2.4. Contact Setting
3.2.5. Loads and Boundary Conditions
3.3. Numerical Simulation Results
4. Experimental Testing
4.1. Experimental Design
4.2. Experiment Process
4.3. Experimental Results and Analysis
5. Conclusions
- (1)
- According to the numerical simulation results, it is evident that the sealing pressure rises proportionally with the augmentation of the compression rate, illustrating a clear linear correlation between the two factors. The sealing gasket achieves impressive sealing pressures of 2.91 MPa, 4.22 MPa, and 5.95 MPa at compression rates of 8%, 11%, and 14%, respectively.
- (2)
- Concerning the NBR seals of the specifications employed in this study, the higher contact pressure is predominantly concentrated in the intermediate region. The primary sealing function is effectively performed by the central area of the contact surface, encompassing a length of approximately 3 mm and accounting for 75% of the total contact area.
- (3)
- Airtightness testing experiments were conducted on both the conventional and modified bolted ball joints using the bubble leakage detection method. The outcomes revealed that the conventional bolted ball joint exhibited no sealing whatsoever, while the bolted ball joint incorporating the sealing structure demonstrated impeccable sealing performance.
- (4)
- The sealing method for bolted ball joints provides a cost-effective solution with simple installation and maintenance. Retaining the traditional appearance of the joint, it guarantees impeccable internal sealing. This prevents seawater intrusion and corrosion, aligning perfectly with the application demands of the bolted ball joint in the realm of marine engineering.
- (5)
- The sealing method facilitates the successful adaptation of steel grid structures, extensively employed in terrestrial settings, for utilization in marine engineering applications, encompassing offshore floating platforms and deep-sea fish cages. Analytical and computational findings underscore that this approach effectively ensures optimal sealing performance even at depths of up to 607.14 m in seawater.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cao, Z.; Du, P.; Chen, Z. The stability and stressed skin effect analyses of an 80 m diameter single-layer latticed dome with bolt-ball joints. Int. J. Steel Struct. 2016, 16, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.B.; Xi, S.L.; Cheng, H.S. Analysis of the structure style selection for ocean engineering floating structure. Adv. Mater. Res. 2011, 163, 501–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amaechi, C.V.; Reda, A.; Butler, H.O.; Ja’e, I.A.; An, C. Review on Fixed and Floating Offshore Structures. Part I: Types of Platforms with Some Applications. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aksu, R.; Uguz, R.O.; Erdogan, M. Investigation, Modeling and Design of a Cathodic Protection System for Hull Structures in Marine Environment. ECS Trans. 2016, 72, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Si, Q.; Tang, Y.; Zong, L.; Liu, H.; Kang, B. Experimental Study and Numerical Simulation of the Tensile Properties of Corroded Bolt-Sphere Joints. Buildings 2022, 12, 1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, X.D.; Xi, G.F.; Yang, J. Comparative Study on Corrosion of Mild Steel in Natural and Simulated Marine Environment. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2011, 66, 1828–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, L.; Stewart, M.G.; Melchers, R.E. Corrosion and capacity prediction of marine steel infrastructure under a changing environment. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 2017, 13, 988–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, L.Q.; Liu, M.W.; Abi, E. Erosion characteristics of viscoelastic anticorrosive coatings for steel structures under sand flow. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 258, 120360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, F.; Hong, Z.H.; Huang, P. A Sealing Structure for Bolted Ball Joints. Jiangxi Province. CN 217682657U, 28 October 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, R.L. Sealed Connecting Rods for Bolted Ball Joint Grid Structure. Tianjin. CN 2571842, 10 September 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Li, J.X.; Liu, P.F.; Wang, S.B.; Leng, J.X. Finite Element Analysis of O-ring Sealing Performance of Manned Submersible Viewports. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 2020, 20, 1628–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, C.; Chen, G.; Liu, P. Finite Element Analysis of Sealing Performance of Rubber D-Ring Seal in High-Pressure Hydrogen Storage Vessel. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 2018, 18, 846–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GB/T 33509-2017; General Specification for Mechanical Seals. China Machinery Industry Federation: Beijing, China, 2017.
- Zhao, Z.F.; Shi, X.; Hua, Y.L. Performance analysis and test on the sealing structure of repair clamp for subsea pipeline. Ocean. Eng. 2023, 41, 101–109. [Google Scholar]
- Bhaumik, S.; Kumaraswamy, A.; Guruprasad, S. Investigation of friction in rectangular Nitrile-Butadiene Rubber (NBR) hydraulic rod seals for defense applications. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2015, 29, 4793–4799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, X.; Huang, S.; Hui, H. Analysis of sealing performance of a kind of profiled rubber gasket used in the radial contact seal structure. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part E J. Process Mech. Eng. 2021, 235, 857–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jing, T.; Weimin, Y.; Yumei, D. Finite Element Analysis of Rectangular Rubber Seals. Lubr. Eng. 2007, 2, 36–39. [Google Scholar]
- Biram, J.; Barrows, G. Bubble tests for gas tightness. Vacuum 1964, 14, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GB/16939-2016; High Strength Bolts for Joints of Space Grid Structures. China Machinery Industry Federation: Beijing, China, 2016.
Device Name | Model | Amount | Performance Parameters |
---|---|---|---|
Air Compressor | XSZG-30A | 1 | Maximum output pressure 0.8 MPa (8 atmospheric pressure) |
Pressure gauge | Y-100 | 1 | Range 1.6 MPa, accuracy 1.6 grade |
Dial calipers | LJ800-001 | 1 | Range 0–150 mm |
Torque spanner | WT8-30 | 1 | Torque range 50–1000 N-m, graduation value 0.1, accuracy ±2% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Du, W.; Gu, J.; Sheng, G.; Guo, G.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, Z. Enhancing the Sealing Performance of Bolted Ball Joints by Gaskets: Numerical Simulation and Experiment. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 2050. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11112050
Du W, Gu J, Sheng G, Guo G, Zhao Y, Liu Z. Enhancing the Sealing Performance of Bolted Ball Joints by Gaskets: Numerical Simulation and Experiment. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2023; 11(11):2050. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11112050
Chicago/Turabian StyleDu, Wenfeng, Jinchao Gu, Guilin Sheng, Guang Guo, Yongrun Zhao, and Zhijian Liu. 2023. "Enhancing the Sealing Performance of Bolted Ball Joints by Gaskets: Numerical Simulation and Experiment" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 11, no. 11: 2050. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11112050
APA StyleDu, W., Gu, J., Sheng, G., Guo, G., Zhao, Y., & Liu, Z. (2023). Enhancing the Sealing Performance of Bolted Ball Joints by Gaskets: Numerical Simulation and Experiment. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11(11), 2050. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11112050