Next Article in Journal
Experimental Study on the Target–Receiver Formation Problem with the Exploitation of Coherent and Non-Coherent Bearing Information
Next Article in Special Issue
The Clay Mineralogy and Geochemistry of Sediments in the Beibu Gulf, South China Sea: A Record of the Holocene Sedimentary Environmental Change
Previous Article in Journal
Deep Learning-Based Signal Detection for Underwater Acoustic OTFS Communication
Previous Article in Special Issue
Study on the Surface Interactions of Co(II) with Phospholipids from the Marine Environment
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JMSE
Volume 10
Issue 12
10.3390/jmse10121921
Review Report
jmse-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Heavy Metal Contamination and Ecological Risk Assessment in the Sediment Cores of the Wetlands in Southern Thailand

J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10(12), 1921; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10121921
by Siriporn Pradit 1, Prakrit Noppradit 1,*, Panisara Jitkaew 1, Karnda Sengloyluan 2, Thawanrat Kobkeatthawin 3, Araf Laerosa 1 and Sanya Sirivithayapakorn 4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Egberto Pereira
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10(12), 1921; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10121921
Submission received: 9 November 2022 / Revised: 30 November 2022 / Accepted: 2 December 2022 / Published: 6 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biogeochemistry of Trace Elements in the Marine Environment)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This manuscript evaluated the pollution and distribution of heavy metals in sediment cores of wetland forests in Khuan Khi Sian wetland, Thailand. The information obtained in this manuscript is valuable to better control heavy metal pollution in wetlands.

However, the manuscript must be significantly improved before it could be further processed. Please refer to the attachment for some suggestions.

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper is interesting but some improvement needs done for the paper to be published. The comments were fixed in the manuscript.    

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop