Next Article in Journal
Impact of Soil Amendments on the Hydraulic Conductivity of Boreal Agricultural Podzols
Previous Article in Journal
Muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia Michx., syn. Muscandinia rotundifolia (Michx.) Small): The Resilient, Native Grape of the Southeastern U.S
Previous Article in Special Issue
Labelling as a Tool for Improving Animal Welfare—The Pig Case
Review

Addressing Animal Welfare through Collaborative Stakeholder Networks

1
The Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4067, Australia
2
School of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia
3
School of Human Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia
4
School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales 2308, Australia
5
School of Political Science and International Studies, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4067, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2019, 9(6), 132; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9060132
Received: 19 April 2019 / Revised: 19 June 2019 / Accepted: 19 June 2019 / Published: 22 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Farm Animal Welfare)
In this review, we discuss animal welfare as a complex and contested issue facing society and outline why collaborative, multi-stakeholder approaches are critical for effective policy development. Using the lens of “wicked problems” and drawing upon governance literature on policy networks, we identify important factors for working with the inherent complexity of animal welfare through the inclusion of various stakeholder perspectives. We present two case studies that illustrate policy network approaches to animal welfare and highlight the value of fostering collaboration among various stakeholder groups from the industry, community, research, and government sectors. We suggest that the influence of stakeholder networks will likely increase in coming years as newer forms of participatory governance become common. By understanding how collaborative stakeholder networks establish participatory governance, productive communication, and collective priorities, leaders in the field of animal welfare can more productively engage with stakeholders and achieve long-lasting improvements in animal welfare. View Full-Text
Keywords: animal welfare; collaboration; stakeholder networks; policy networks; wicked problems; participatory governance animal welfare; collaboration; stakeholder networks; policy networks; wicked problems; participatory governance
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Fernandes, J.; Blache, D.; Maloney, S.K.; Martin, G.B.; Venus, B.; Walker, F.R.; Head, B.; Tilbrook, A. Addressing Animal Welfare through Collaborative Stakeholder Networks. Agriculture 2019, 9, 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9060132

AMA Style

Fernandes J, Blache D, Maloney SK, Martin GB, Venus B, Walker FR, Head B, Tilbrook A. Addressing Animal Welfare through Collaborative Stakeholder Networks. Agriculture. 2019; 9(6):132. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9060132

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fernandes, Jill, Dominique Blache, Shane K. Maloney, Graeme B. Martin, Bronwyn Venus, Frederick R. Walker, Brian Head, and Alan Tilbrook. 2019. "Addressing Animal Welfare through Collaborative Stakeholder Networks" Agriculture 9, no. 6: 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9060132

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop