Next Article in Journal
Translocation of Endosulfan from Soil to Ginseng (Panax ginseng C. A. Meyer)
Previous Article in Journal
Fate of Fertilizer-Derived N Applied to Enhance Rice Straw Decomposition in a Paddy Field during the Fallow Season under Cool Temperature Conditions
Article Menu
Issue 4 (April) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessReview
Agriculture 2018, 8(4), 51;

22 Years of Governance Structures and Performance: What Has Been Achieved in Agrifood Chains and Beyond? A Review

Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University; Ghent B-9000, Belgium
School of Business and Management Studies, Mountains of the Moon University, Fort-portal, Uganda
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 12 February 2018 / Revised: 27 March 2018 / Accepted: 27 March 2018 / Published: 31 March 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [3848 KB, uploaded 3 May 2018]   |  


Although the existing literature has shown that the choice of governance structure plays a key role in inter-organizational performance, the nature of construct measurability still remains equivocal. The diversity of terminologies used means that the full potential of most studies may be lost in the confusion of indistinctive and misapplied terms. To better understand the relationship between governance structures and performance, a descriptive systematic review was conducted on the extant literature; essentially, to provide a comprehensive point of reference for researchers interested in this research area and to identify future research gaps. A simple analytical framework—Search, Appraisal, and Synthesis—was used to extract data. A total of 110 peer-reviewed journal articles were identified and analyzed. The results indicated that different governance structures are positively related to performance except for the spot market. The findings provide strong evidence that under certain circumstances, the contractual governance structure is negatively related to performance. Whereas in other circumstances, there is a positive interaction. Furthermore, the results revealed that numerous proxy indicators have been used to measure governance structures and performance. Overall, this study provides new insights on the relationship between governance structures and performance in the agrifood sector and beyond. The contribution of the study, implications, and suggestions for future research outlook are discussed in relation to governance structures and performance. View Full-Text
Keywords: governance structures; performance; agrifood chains; systematic literature review governance structures; performance; agrifood chains; systematic literature review

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary File 1:

    PDF-Document (PDF, 158 KB)

  • Externally hosted supplementary file 1
    Link: http://Table 2
    Description: Governance structures, Performance, Agrifood chains, Systematic literature review

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Kataike, J.; Gellynck, X. 22 Years of Governance Structures and Performance: What Has Been Achieved in Agrifood Chains and Beyond? A Review. Agriculture 2018, 8, 51.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Agriculture EISSN 2077-0472 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top