Next Article in Journal
GL-SeqNet: Global–Local Fusion for Intra-Cluster Tomato Harvesting Sequence Optimization
Previous Article in Journal
The Effects of Trichoderma asperellum and Its Chitin on Water-Stable Aggregates in Black Soil
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Intelligent Perception and Control Technologies for Combine Harvesters in Complex Agricultural Environments: A Review

1
School of Agricultural Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
2
School of Mechanical Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2026, 16(12), 1320; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16121320 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 8 May 2026 / Revised: 11 June 2026 / Accepted: 13 June 2026 / Published: 15 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Agricultural Technology)

Abstract

Combine harvesters in lodged, wet, weedy, uneven, or otherwise heterogeneous fields operate under rapidly changing feed rate, load, and material flow conditions. These disturbances often appear as drum overload, cleaning loss, grain breakage, impurity increase, and unstable travel, whereas conventional fixed-parameter operation still depends heavily on operator experience. This review examines intelligent perception and control technologies for combine harvesters from a mechanism-to-control perspective. The discussion covers dynamic load evolution, cleaning loss and grain damage mechanisms, multivariable coupling, pre-harvest perception, feed rate and internal state sensing, result layer loss and quality monitoring, forward speed control, threshing drum load regulation, adaptive cleaning control, and whole machine integration. The literature shows a clear shift from isolated sensing or single-parameter adjustment toward multimodal perception, state estimation, predictive control, digital twins, and edge deployment. At the same time, field robustness, cross-condition generalization, actuator bandwidth, sensing delay, and the coupling between result layer monitoring and closed-loop control remain the main barriers to deployment. The review, therefore, argues for a whole machine architecture that links environmental preview, internal state estimation, loss quality feedback, actuator-aware control, and cloud–edge–device collaboration for stable, low-loss, and autonomous harvesting in complex agricultural environments.
Keywords: combine harvester; complex agricultural environment; intelligent perception; intelligent control; multi-parameter coordinated control combine harvester; complex agricultural environment; intelligent perception; intelligent control; multi-parameter coordinated control

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liang, Z.; Hu, H. Intelligent Perception and Control Technologies for Combine Harvesters in Complex Agricultural Environments: A Review. Agriculture 2026, 16, 1320. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16121320

AMA Style

Liang Z, Hu H. Intelligent Perception and Control Technologies for Combine Harvesters in Complex Agricultural Environments: A Review. Agriculture. 2026; 16(12):1320. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16121320

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liang, Zhenwei, and Hemeng Hu. 2026. "Intelligent Perception and Control Technologies for Combine Harvesters in Complex Agricultural Environments: A Review" Agriculture 16, no. 12: 1320. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16121320

APA Style

Liang, Z., & Hu, H. (2026). Intelligent Perception and Control Technologies for Combine Harvesters in Complex Agricultural Environments: A Review. Agriculture, 16(12), 1320. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16121320

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop