Next Article in Journal
Canonical Analysis of the Impact of Climate Predictors on Sugarcane Yield in the Eastern Region of Pernambuco, Brazil
Previous Article in Journal
Evolution and Reduction in Sulfonamide Resistance Genes in Aerobic Compost of Pig Manure
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Research on Driving Forces of Spatiotemporal Patterns in Cotton Cultivation Considering Spatial Heterogeneity

1
School of Remote Sensing & Geomatics Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
2
School of Ecology and Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
3
Shanxi Key Laboratory of Agricultural Information Perception and Intelligent Service, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2025, 15(20), 2163; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15202163 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 27 September 2025 / Revised: 14 October 2025 / Accepted: 16 October 2025 / Published: 18 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Artificial Intelligence and Digital Agriculture)

Abstract

Cotton is increasingly important in global development. The exploration of drivers of spatiotemporal patterns for cotton planting, considering spatial heterogeneity, is essential for optimizing its distribution and supporting sustainable production. This study combined the locally explained stratified heterogeneity (LESH) model with geographically weighted regression (GWR) to investigate the factors shaping cotton-planting patterns in the northern slope of the Tianshan Mountains (NSTM), China, from 2000 to 2020. Cotton distribution was derived from long-term Landsat image series, and its expansion showed an average annual growth rate of 2.10 × 103 km2, with intensive cultivation primarily distributed across the central and western counties. The dominant drivers of cotton distribution were elevation (ELE), sunshine duration (SD), slope (SLO), temperature (TEM), runoff (RO), and gross domestic product (GDP). ELE explained about 40% of the spatial heterogeneity. SD showed a declining influence, SLO remained stable, TEM increased in importance, and GDP exhibited a progressive upward trend, although weaker. Moreover, nonlinear weakening interactions, especially between ELE and other factors, as well as between socio-economic and climatic variables, substantially enhanced explanatory power. These findings highlight the significance of accounting for spatial heterogeneity and factor interactions in guiding the spatial optimization and sustainable management of cotton cultivation.
Keywords: cotton cultivation; spatiotemporal dynamics; spatial heterogeneity; driving forces; LESH; GWR; Xinjiang cotton cultivation; spatiotemporal dynamics; spatial heterogeneity; driving forces; LESH; GWR; Xinjiang

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Du, M.; Shen, D.; Yang, X.; Lin, F.; Wu, C.; Zhang, D. Research on Driving Forces of Spatiotemporal Patterns in Cotton Cultivation Considering Spatial Heterogeneity. Agriculture 2025, 15, 2163. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15202163

AMA Style

Du M, Shen D, Yang X, Lin F, Wu C, Zhang D. Research on Driving Forces of Spatiotemporal Patterns in Cotton Cultivation Considering Spatial Heterogeneity. Agriculture. 2025; 15(20):2163. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15202163

Chicago/Turabian Style

Du, Meng, Deyu Shen, Xun Yang, Fenfang Lin, Chunfa Wu, and Dongyan Zhang. 2025. "Research on Driving Forces of Spatiotemporal Patterns in Cotton Cultivation Considering Spatial Heterogeneity" Agriculture 15, no. 20: 2163. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15202163

APA Style

Du, M., Shen, D., Yang, X., Lin, F., Wu, C., & Zhang, D. (2025). Research on Driving Forces of Spatiotemporal Patterns in Cotton Cultivation Considering Spatial Heterogeneity. Agriculture, 15(20), 2163. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15202163

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop