Next Article in Journal
A Lightweight Citrus Object Detection Method in Complex Environments
Previous Article in Journal
Enhanced Black-Winged Kite Algorithm for Drone Coverage in Complex Fruit Farms
Previous Article in Special Issue
Construction of an SNP Fingerprinting Database and Population Genetic Analysis of Auricularia heimuer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High Resistance and Yield: A New Cultivar ‘ZJLZS002’ of Lyophyllum decastes Suitable for Industrial Cultivation

1
Kunming Edible Fungi Institute of All China Federation of Supply and Marketing Cooperatives, Kunming 650221, China
2
Jiangsu Hongsheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Xuzhou 221000, China
3
Yunnan Academy of Edible Fungi Industry Development Center, Kunming 650021, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2025, 15(10), 1045; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15101045
Submission received: 13 March 2025 / Revised: 29 April 2025 / Accepted: 9 May 2025 / Published: 12 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetics and Breeding of Edible Mushroom)

Abstract

:
Lyophyllum decastes, commonly known as Luronggu, is extensively cultivated across China. It exhibits rich germplasm in China. However, the number of cultivars available for commercial production is limited, highlighting the importance of targeted breeding programs. In this study, we utilized selected breeding and SSR molecular markers to develop improved strains of L. decastes for the first time. The breeding process strictly adhered to China’s national standard for ‘Technical inspection for mushroom selecting and breeding’. It encompassed pure strain isolation, biological classification, primary screening, secondary screening, physiological performance determination, molecular characterization, intermediate test, and demonstration cultivation. As a result, strain ZJLZS002, known for its high yield (380 ± 3.6 g·bag−1), shortened growth period (75.6 ± 1.3 d), and stable traits, is well suited for industrial cultivation. This new cultivar has achieved a significant milestone as the first variety in China to be officially recognized at the provincial level, under the name ‘Zhongjunluronggu No. 1’. Its development signifies a crucial advancement in achieving seed source independence and promotes the replacement of imported varieties with domestic ones, contributing to the sustainable development of China’s edible fungi industry.

1. Introduction

Lyophyllum decastes (Fr.) Singer, a rare and valuable edible–medicinal mushroom, possesses exceptional nutritional and pharmacological properties [1]. This mushroom, belonging to the phylum Basidiomycota, order Agaricales, family Lyophyllaceae, and the genus Lyophyllum [2,3], exhibits a natural distribution across temperate regions of the northern hemisphere, including China, Japan, Korea, and European and American countries [4,5]. Particularly in China, in regions such as Yunnan, Guizhou, Liaoning, Jilin, Heilongjiang, and the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, its genetic diversity is abundant [6]. It is particularly prized for its delicate texture, aromatic grass-like scent, and delightful taste [7]. Both the fruiting body and mycelium are abundant in proteins, amino acids, and various vitamins, as well as critical trace elements, including iron, zinc, and selenium [8,9,10]. Notably, it has garnered significant attention for its bioactive substances. Its polysaccharides exhibit a variety of potential health-promoting properties, such as antioxidant, hypolipidemic, antitumor, antibacterial, and antidiabetic effects [11,12,13,14].
As an emerging culinary-medicinal mushroom, L. decastes has experienced rapid production growth following the development of industrial cultivation [7]. China currently dominates global production, with official data from the China Edible Fungi Association Public Service Platform reporting 193,131 tons of output in 2023 (https://bigdata.cefa.org.cn/output.html, accessed on 28 April 2025). Major production regions are concentrated in the provinces of Guizhou, Shandong, Jiangxi, Fujian, Sichuan, and Gansu [15]. However, our research team has identified concerning genetic uniformity among commercial strains (non-published material). Market analysis revealed that most cultivated strains in China can be traced back to a single progenitor—the KX-HA092 variety, originally introduced in Japan by Shanghai Fengke Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) [16].
There have been reports on the breeding of new strains and varieties of L. decastes. Using selected breeding, Woo et al. [17] evaluated nine strains from South Korea and Japan, identifying SPA202 and SPA205 as high-yield stains. Yoshihama et al. [18] achieved fruiting body formation on artificial media, and applied for a US patent in 1994. Wei et al. [19] successfully isolated wild strains from China’s Qilian Mountains using potato dextrose agar (PDA) enrichment medium. Qiu et al. [20] developed the dark-brown cultivar ‘Changli No. 1’. Utilizing monosporous hybridization, the commercially valuable KX-HA092 variety was developed through crossing Japanese strains 5-99 and 62-33(2) with Swiss strain IFO32185, and its growth period was 78 days [21]. Pan et al. [22] developed three improved hybrids (KL4, KL10, KL17) with superior fruiting body characteristics, among which KL17 demonstrated optimal morphology and the shortest production cycle. Furthermore, Liang et al. [23] successfully screened a high-yield laccase strain HY1022-01 through UV-induced protoplast mutagenesis and selected a new high-polysaccharide-yield strain ZY481-1 by protoplast mutagenesis; its polysaccharide yield was up to 643.1961 mg/g, which revealed a 31.05% increase compared with the original strain, ZY48-1 [24]. Despite the successful establishment of large-scale industrial cultivation for L. decastes, several critical challenges persist that hinder its full commercial potential. These include (1) the scarcity of potential strains with independent intellectual property rights, (2) slow mycelial growth rates, (3) suboptimal yield performance, (4) rapid spawn degeneration, and (5) poor resistance [1,25]. These limitations collectively constrain its commercial development and market competitiveness.
Simple sequence repeat (SSR) molecular markers offer a powerful solution for germplasm improvement. As codominant markers that detect genetic variation at the DNA level, SSRs exhibit several superior characteristics: (1) environmental stability, (2) high reproducibility, and (3) exceptional discriminatory power. Notably, SSR molecular markers, developed from whole genome sequences, demonstrate enhanced polymorphism and more comprehensive genome coverage compared to other marker systems [26,27]. These attributes make SSR analysis an indispensable tool for assessing genetic diversity and germplasm resources in edible fungi; however, there are no reports on L. decastes to date.
In developing the new variety ‘ZJLZS002’, our research team implemented a comprehensive breeding strategy for (1) precise strain identification, (2) intellectual property protection, and (3) varietal registration.
Considering China’s current cultivation scenario, this strategy facilitates (1) systematic development of improved industrial strains, (2) the creation of novel cultivars, and (3) the sustainable advancement of the industry. The implementation of this strategy is particularly significant for (1) optimizing L. decastes germplasm resources, and (2) enhancing China’s independent germplasm innovation capacity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

2.1.1. Tested Strains

The nine tested strains utilized in the present study are illustrated in Table 1 and are stored at the Germplasm Resource Bank of Edible Fungi, Kunming Edible Fungi Institute of All China Federation of Supply and Marketing Cooperatives. LR-A, obtained from Jiangsu Hongsheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Xuzhou, China), was used as the benchmark control variety. We executed the preservation of patented strains at the China Center for Type Culture Collection of Wuhan University, and filed patent applications for potential strains.

2.1.2. Culture Conditions

PDA enrichment medium was used for pure strain isolation and culture. It included 200 g of potatoes (immersed), 20 g of glucose, 16 g of agar, 3 g of yeast powder, 3 g of potassium dihydrogen phosphate, and 1.5 g of magnesium sulfate, all dissolved in 1 L of water, with the pH adjusted to 6. Pure strains were maintained in darkness at 25 °C. A liquid medium was used to produce liquid spawn. It included 200 g of potatoes (immersed), 20 g of glucose, 3 g of yeast powder, 3 g of potassium dihydrogen phosphate, and 1.5 g of magnesium sulfate, combined with 1 L of water, with the pH adjusted to 6. The liquid spawn were incubated in a shaking incubator (in darkness at 25 °C, shaken at 160 rpm). The culture medium for cultivation comprised 35% wood chips, 35% corn cob, 20% wheat bran, 4% corn meal, 4% soybean meal, and 2% calcium bicarbonate, with the pH adjusted to 6. Mycelium was cultured in darkness at 25 °C, with a relative humidity of less than 70%.

2.2. Methods

Adhering to the national standard for ‘Technical inspection for mushroom selecting and breeding’ [28], the breeding process is shown in Figure 1.

2.2.1. Tissue Isolation and Purification

First, a small piece of tissue at the junction of the cap and stipe of the fruiting body, approximately 5 mm × 5 mm in size, was excised using a sterile scalpel, transferred into the PDA enrichment medium, and purified 2–3 times. Strains exhibiting superior mycelium growth were then selected. These selected strains were incubated in darkness at 25 °C for 12–15 days.

2.2.2. Biological Classification

DNA was successfully extracted from the mycelium using an optimized CTAB procedureDNA [29,30]. Primer sets LR0R-LR5 [31], were applied to amplify the nuclear ribosomal large subunit (nrLSU) sequence. The PCR reaction conditions followed the protocol described by Tang et al. [3]. The PCR products were dispatched to Tianyi Huayu Gene Technology Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China) for subsequent sequencing analysis.
The L. decastes sequences produced in this study were submitted to the NCBI database for Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?PROGRAM=blastn&PAGE_TYPE=BlastSearch&LINK_LOC=blasthome), and clusters with closely related sequences were downloaded. The nrLSU dataset was submitted to the MAFFT version 7 [32] online platform for alignment, and maximum likelihood (ML) analyses was conducted at IQTREE Web Server (http://iqtree.cibiv.univie.ac.at/, accessed on 28 April 2025). The optimal TNe+G4 model was obtained using 1000 replicates with default parameters. Calocybe vinacea was used as the outgroup. Only bootstrap support values of branches ≥70 were displayed on the phylogenetic tree.

2.2.3. Primary Screening

Strains of the same fungal age and with a diameter of 5 mm were connected to the center of the PDA enrichment medium and incubated at a constant temperature at 25 °C for 14 days. Utilizing colony characteristics, mycelial growth potential, and growth rate as criteria, each strain was tested three times to screen for the good-performing strains. Subsequently, the strains capable of fruiting on the PDA enrichment medium were selected for further secondary screening.

2.2.4. Secondary Screening

Polypropylene bags, each measuring 18 cm × 33 cm, were used to contain 400 g of dry cultivation substrate (comprising 35% wood chips, 35% corn cob, 20% wheat bran, 4% corn meal, 4% soybean meal, and 2% calcium bicarbonate). These bags were then sterilized at a temperature of 121 °C and pressure of 0.15 MPa for 120 min. A total of 60 bags were allocated for each strain. In a sterile environment, the liquid spawn of the dominant strains was introduced into the sterilized bags and maintained at a stable temperature of 25 °C in darkness for 50 days. Fruiting management was carried out according to the industrial cultivation method of L. decastes [33].
The potential strains, characterized by high yield and suitability for industrial production, were selected based on their agronomic characteristics, such as single fruit mass, cap diameter, stipe diameter, yield, biological efficiency, and growth period.
Z = X Y × 100 %
In the equation, Z represents biological efficiency; X denotes the yield weight per bag, measured in grams; Y stands for the weight of the dry cultivation substrate per package, also measured in grams.

2.2.5. Physiological Performance Determination of Potential Strains

Antagonistic Reaction Determination

So far, no varieties of L. decastes have been identified in China. The prevalent cultivar LR-A served as the control. Mycelium pieces of the same fungal age and dimensions from potential strains and LR-A were excised using a 5 mm punch and planted on PDA enrichment medium via the two-point inoculation technique [34]. Subsequent observation of the antagonistic response was conducted at a temperature of 25 °C.

Antibacterial TEST

Using a 5 mm hole punch, mycelium pieces of the same fungal age and dimensions were selected from the potential strains, Penicillium brevicompactum and Trichoderma pleuroticola, and were planted in the PDA enrichment medium via the two-point inoculation technique. The cultures were monitored for growth at a temperature of 25 °C for a designated duration, and the antibacterial efficacy was determined through calculation, with triple repetition. The antibacterial efficacy, denoted as E, was calculated using the following formula:
E = ( R 1 R 2 ) R 1 × 100 %
where R1 signifies the radius of mold growth under normal conditions, measured in centimeters, and R2 represents the radius of mold growth in the two-point confrontation experiment, also in centimeters.

2.2.6. Molecular Characterization: SSR Molecular Markers

Based on the sequencing platform, SSR loci were identified in the sequence of the L. decastes genome (GCF_021015755.1) from the database for development and screening. Following DNA extraction [30] and PCR amplification [35], capillary electrophoresis (CE) was performed on an ABI 3730XL sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Capillary electropherograms were analyzed with GeneMarker® version 2.7.0. Ten pairs of SSR primers with clear amplification bands, high reproducibility, and high specificity were obtained. These included LD045, LD063, LD089, LD093, LD094, LD095, LD098, LD129, LD149, and LD157. The details of these 10 pairs of SSR primers are presented in Table 2.

2.2.7. Intermediate Test

Utilizing the industrial cultivation method of L. decastes [33], potential strains and LR-A were cultivated, with a total of 1500 bags set up for each strain across three replicate groups. The yield of each strain was measured with 100 bags randomly selected, and the agronomic traits of the fruiting bodies were documented to determine the yield and growth period.

2.2.8. Demonstration Cultivation

From April 2022 to April 2024, demonstration cultivation was carried out at Base 1: Jinning Baofeng Base, Kunming Institute of Edible Fungi, All China Supply and Marketing Cooperative Society; and Base 2: Jiangsu Hongsheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd., situated in Suining County, Xuzhou City, Jiangsu Province.
Following the provisions set forth in the national standard ‘Technical inspection for mushroom selecting and breeding’ [28], the experimental design for the demonstration cultivation was designed with 10,000 bags per group, across three groups. Utilizing the industrial cultivation method of L. decastes [33], potential strains and LR-A were cultivated. Metrics such as the fresh single fruit mass, first-tide yield, and biological efficiency were counted.

2.2.9. Determination of Nutrient Content in Fruiting Body

Dried fruiting body samples of the potential strains were sent to Yunnan Sanzheng Technical Testing Co., Ltd. (Kunming, China) for analysis, which included the detection of proteins [36], amino acids [37], polysaccharides [38], trace elements, and vitamins, among other components.

2.3. Analysis of Data

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 22. Continuous data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation ( X ¯ ± s). One-way ANOVA, followed by the LSD post hoc test, was used for multiple comparisons among the groups. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Isolation of Strains

A total of 22 wild fruiting bodies were collected from seven provinces across China. Following successful isolation and purification, eight pure strains were obtained.

3.2. Phylogenetic Analyses

Nine new nrLSU sequences were generated (Table 3). The phylogenetic tree based on nrLSU sequences indicates that the nine strains, along with two other known L. decastes strains, are clustered in the large clade (Figure 2).

3.3. Comparison of Preliminary Screening

Analysis of the mycelium growth rates revealed that, as detailed in Table 4, strains ZJLZS002 and ZJLZS003 exhibited thick and strong growth, with respective mycelium growth rates of 0.35 cm/d and 0.36 cm/d. ZJLZS002 and ZJLZS003 had significant differences compared with the other six strains (p < 0.05). Strains ZJLZS004, ZJLZS005, ZJLZZS006, and ZJLZS008 displayed thin and average growth, with mycelial growth rates of 0.31 cm/d, 0.30 cm/d, 0.30 cm/d, and 0.30 cm/d, respectively. ZJLZS001 and ZJLZS007, however, presented as thin and weak, with mycelial growth of 0.27 cm/d. As depicted in Figure 3, ZJLZS001, ZJLZS002, ZJLZS003, and ZJLZS007 demonstrated their capability to form fruiting bodies at the later stage of mycelium culture in the PDA enrichment medium, indicating their fruiting potential. Consequently, strains ZJLZS002 and ZJLZS003, marked by their good growth and fruiting ability, were selected for the secondary screening.

3.4. Comparison of Secondary Screening

Compared to strain ZJLZS003, ZJLZS002 demonstrated superior fruiting body development, characterized by greater thickness and higher quality, as indicated in Figure 4 and Table 5. Its yield reached an impressive 374.67 ± 8.5 g per bag, significantly higher than that of ZJLZS003, with 337 ± 21 g (p < 0.05). The cap was of moderate size, with a diameter of 33.89 ± 0.57 mm. The length of the stipe was 9.8 ± 0.36 cm, its upper diameter was 10.92 ± 0.33 mm (p < 0.05), and its bottom diameter was 16.49 ± 1.00 mm (p < 0.05). The single fruit mass was 16 ± 0.26 g, and the growth period was 75.7 ± 1.5 d (p < 0.05). Consequently, ZJLZS002 was selected as a potential strain for physiological performance detection, distinguishing identification, intermediate testing, and demonstration cultivation.

3.5. Results of Antagonistic Reaction

The results of the antagonism tests reveal an isolated antagonistic interaction between ZJLZS002 and LR-A, as depicted in Figure 5. Additionally, distinct differences were observed in the mycelial morphology.

3.6. Results of Antibacterial Test

As depicted in Figure 6 and Table 6, during the antibacterial evaluation against Penicillium brevicompactum and Trichoderma pleuroticola, the potential strain ZJLZS002 demonstrated impressive antibacterial efficacy, with rates of 54.2% and 48.8%, respectively, outperforming LR-A, which achieved rates of only 33.3% and 21.9%. This indicates that ZJLZS002 possessed higher resistance.

3.7. Amplification Results of SSR

Following amplification with ten SSR primer pairs (LD045, LD063, LD089, LD093, LD094, LD095, LD098, LD129, LD149, and LD157), capillary electropherograms revealed distinct fragment size profiles between ZJLZS002 and LR-A,, as displayed in Figure 7 and Table 7. The amplified fragments of ZJLZS002 measured (167, 169), 281, 192, 162, 158, 200, (284, 299), (187, 190), 346, and (142, 145) bp, respectively. In contrast, LR-A produced fragments of 171, (288, 290), 189, 169, 181, 217, 286, (172, 187), 206, and 135 bp. These results demonstrate that the ten SSR markers effectively differentiate LR-A from ZJLZS002 based on their polymorphic fragment sizes.

3.8. Results of Intermediate Test

In contrast to LR-A, ZJLZS002 exhibited a higher yield and biological efficiency. There was a significant disparity in the bottom diameter and single fruit mass (p < 0.05), with ZJLZS002 having a bottom diameter of 16.47 ± 0.53 mm, compared to LR-A’s 10.93 ± 1.18 mm. Similarly, the single fruit mass of ZJLZS002 was 15.77 ± 0.95 g, whereas LR-A’s was 11.5 ± 0.78 g. Notably, significant differences (p < 0.05) were also observed in the stipe length, upper diameter, and yield. Specifically, the stipe length of ZJLZS002 was 9.63 ± 0.49 cm, compared to LR-A’s 10.9 ± 0.4 cm; the upper diameter was 10.38 ± 0.48 mm, while LR-A’s was 7.87 ± 1.27 mm; and the yield was 380 ± 3.6 g, compared to LR-A’s 345.7 ± 13.9 g. Although the growth period of ZJLZS002 was 2 days shorter than that of LR-A, this discrepancy was not statistically significant, nor was the discrepancy in cap size (Table 8). Intermediate testing revealed that ZJLZS002 was characterized by its stability, shortened growth period, and the advantages of high yield and biological efficiency.

3.9. Results of Demonstration Cultivation

Compared to LR-A, as shown in Table 9, the biological efficiency of the ZJLZS002 groups 1, 2, and 3 were significantly higher (p < 0.05). Across different locations and multiple demonstration cultivations, the yield of ZJLZS002 increased by 8.31%.
The results of these trials for ZJLZS002 satisfy the criteria for new cultivar identification, as shown in Figure 8 and Figure 9. On 20 August 2024, ZJLZS002 passed the identification of non-major crop varieties in Yunnan Province by Yunnan Seed Management Station. The new cultivar was named ‘Zhongjunluronggu No. 1’, which successfully bred the first new variety of L. decastes suitable for industrial cultivation in China.

3.10. Nutrient Contents of ZJLZS002 Fruiting Bodies

The nutrient contents of ZJLZS002 are shown in Table 10.

4. Discussion

Lyophyllum decastes is known as Luronggu in China because of its striking resemblance to an antler [8]. It is also referred to as the fried chicken mushroom in Europe [41]. Unlike well-established cultivated mushrooms, such as Lentinula edodes [42] and Agaricus bisporus [43], which have centuries of domestication history, L. decastes has a relatively short cultivation timeline of approximately 50 years. It was first successfully cultivated outdoors in 1973 in Zhaotong city, China [44], and its industrial production was initially achieved in Japan in 1998 [7]. Subsequently, it has been widely cultivated in China. China’s successful year-round facility cultivation of this mushroom began in 2006. The establishment of its mechanized and industrial cultivation followed in 2013. The production went from less than 1 ton in 2013 to 193,131 tons in 2023 [7].
Germplasm resources constitute the foundation of the edible fungi industry. However, the seed industry of edible fungi remains an underrecognized sector in China’s agriculture [45]. Thus far, China’s edible fungi industry has been reliant on imported spawn, particularly for industrial varieties. Production heavily depends on foreign-sourced spawns: (1) wood-rotting fungi (e.g., L. decastes, Flammulina filiformis, L. edodes) predominantly originate from Japan and South Korea; (2) straw-rotting fungi (e.g., A. bisporus) are mainly sourced from Europe and North America [46]. Moreover, the domestic capacity for strain development remains limited, with varietal improvement programs operating below the optimal efficiency levels [40]. This has created a critical ‘jam neck’ in China’s edible fungi industry, affecting not only major varieties, such as L. edodes, A. bisporus, and F. velutipes [41,42], but also L. decastes.
Many studies on L. decastes breeding have been conducted globally, including selected breeding, monosporous hybridization, mutagenesis, and protoplasmic fusion. As the most conventional approach, selected breeding, also called natural selection, utilizes naturally occurring genetic variations within existing strains to develop new cultivars [28]. Although methodologically straightforward, this process is often time-intensive. Monosporous hybridization, a dominant breeding method, offers strong directional selection, operational feasibility, and hybrid vigor, albeit with significant time and labor requirements. While mutagenesis and protoplast fusion represent efficient breeding methodologies, they present significant challenges, including uncontrollable DNA mutation and genetic instability in the resulting strains. These limitations substantially complicate breeding efforts and strain stabilization [47].
Recently, SSR molecular markers have become indispensable tools for cultivar identification, population genetics studies, genetic mapping, and marker-assisted breeding. Their successful applications in edible fungi include Lentinula edodes [27], Auricularia heimuer [26], Agaricus bisporus [48], and Flammulina velutipes [49], but not L. decastes. Our investigation identified concerning homogeneity in the Chinese production of this mushroom. Most commercial strains are derived from the Japanese cultivar KX-HA092, and we confirm Tan Qi’s [17] findings of severe uniformity.
Analysis of the Japanese Plant Variety Registration System revealed 28 registered cultivars of L. decastes from 1998 to 2012. However, 21 cultivars are currently inactive (https://www.hinshu2.maff.go.jp/vips/cmm/apCMM110.aspx?MOSS=1, accessed on 28 April 2025). No novel cultivars have been reported in other countries, particularly in China, which exhibits a rich germplasm. In order to bridge the domestic research gap concerning new cultivars of L. decaste and meet industry demands, it is crucial to breed new strains and cultivars. We have successfully developed a novel cultivar utilizing selected breeding and SSR molecular markers for the first time. The cultivar demonstrates superior agronomic characteristics, including high resistance and yield (380 ± 3.6 g·bag−1), a shortened growth period (75.6 ± 1.3 d), and stable traits. Concurrently, we have provided a feasible strategy: (1) precise strain identification, (2) intellectual property protection, and (3) varietal registration. These advancements will be critical for breaking through current production bottlenecks, ensuring seed source security and enhancing the global competitiveness of China’s edible fungi industry.

5. Conclusions

Utilizing selected breeding and SSR molecular markers, this study successfully developed an elite cultivar with significant commercial potential. The key findings include the following: (1) We collected 22 wild specimens from natural habitats and isolated and purified 8 strains with good mycelial growth. (2) after preliminary screening, we selected two stains (ZJLZS002 and ZJLZS003) based on their growth characteristics and fruiting potential. (3) We selected ZJLZS002 as the potential strain, which exhibited a shorter growth period (75.7 ± 1.5 d) and a higher yield (374.67 ± 8.50 g·bag−1) compared to ZJLZS003 based on secondary screening. (4) The results of the antagonism reaction revealed an isolated antagonistic interaction between ZJLZS002 and LR-A. (5) Compared to RL-A, ZJLZS002 had higher resistance based on antibacterial testing. (6) The results of the intermediate test and demonstration cultivation indicate that ZJLZS002 was characterized by its stability, shortened growth period (75.6 ± 1.3 d), high yield (380 ± 3.6 g·bag−1), and high biological efficiency (95%) compared to RL-A. (7) LR-A and ZJLZS002 were differentiated utilizing 10 pairs of SSR primers. (8) ZJLZS002 was officially certified as ‘Zhongjunluronggu No.1’ by the Yunnan Seed Management Station on 20 August 2024. We conclude that ZJLZS002 is well suited for industrial cultivation because of its high yield, shortened growth period, and stable traits.

6. Patents

The strain ZJLZS002 of Lyophyllum decastes, along with its application and SSR molecular marker primer, has the application number 202410492240.1. Application date: 23 April 2024.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.L., S.L., R.H. and D.S.; resources, Q.L., J.Z., F.Z. and J.M.; methodology, Q.L., S.L., J.Z., J.L., X.L. and J.M.; formal analysis, Q.L., S.L., J.Z. and J.L.; validation, Q.L., F.Z. and X.L.; writing—original draft preparation, Q.L.; writing—review and editing, R.H. and D.S.; supervision, R.H. and D.S.; project administration, R.H. and D.S.; funding acquisition, R.H. and D.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFD2201800), the Yunnan Province Key Laboratory of Edible Fungi Germplasm Innovation and Functional Components (202402AN360003), and the Yunnan Province Science and Technology Talent and Platform Plan Project (202305AD160051).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Ma Jianxiong was employed by the company Jiangsu Hongsheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd. He declares that he has no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper, and the other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Chen, J.H.; Zheng, H.F.; Ben, W.D.; Ma, S.Z. Industrial Cultivation of Lyophyllum decastes. Acta Edulis Fungi 2008, 15, 23–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, S.H.; Tang, S.M.; He, J.; Zhou, D.Q. Two New Lyophyllum Species from Yunnan, China. Diversity 2024, 16, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tang, S.M.; Yu, F.M.; Karunarathna, S.; Luo, Z.L.; Niu, K.Y.; Li, R.Y.; Li, L.; Su, X.J.; Li, S.H. Morpho-phylogenetic analyses of two novel edible mushrooms from China and a mini review of Lyophyllum (Agaricales, Lyophyllaceae) cultivation and bioactivities. MycoKeys 2025, 112, 307–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Li, Y.; Li, T.H.; Liang, Y.Z.; Er, T.L.G.; Chen, D.Y. Atlas of Chinese Macrofungal Resources; Central Plains Farmers: Zhengzhou, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen, X.L.; Liu, Y.H.; Guo, W.Z.; Wang, M.F.; Zhao, J.X.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, W.G. The development and nutritional quality of Lyophyllum decastes affected by monochromatic or mixed light provided by light-emitting diode. Front. Nutr. 2024, 11, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Huang, J.Q.; Chen, H.; Lin, Y.; Ye, J.; Wang, Y.X.; Guo, Y.X.; Ma, L.Y. Genetic Differences and Mycelial Morphology of Lyophyllum decastes Strains. Fujian J. Agric. Sci. 2023, 38, 312–321. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, J.H. Cultivation status and nutritional value of Lyophyllum decastes. Edible Med. Mushroom 2021, 29, 12–15. [Google Scholar]
  8. Li, X.Y.; Jiang, W.Z.; Qin, W.X.; Long, W.S. Comparative Analysis of Nutrients in Fruit Body, Mycelia and Fermentation Broth of Lyophyllum decastes. Food Sci. 2010, 31, 155–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xi, Y.L.; Li, M.A.; Qin, W.X.; Hua, G.J.; Jiang, W.Z.; Long, W.S. Assessment for protein nutrition of fruit bodies, mycelia and fermentation broth of Lyophyllum decastes. Mycosystema 2010, 29, 603–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, H.Y.; Zhang, F.Q.; Ming, W.X.; Long, W.S. Nutrition ingredient analysis and evaluation of Lyophyllum decastes fruit body. Mycosystema 2008, 27, 696–700. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang, G.P.; Wang, Y.N.; Qin, C.Q.; Ye, S.M.; Zhang, F.M.; Linhardt, R. Structural characterization of an antioxidant polysaccharide isolated from the fruiting bodies of Lyophyllum decastes. J. Mol. Struct. 2023, 1285, 135507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Miura, T.; Kubo, M.; Itoh, Y.; Iwamoto, N.; Kato, M.; Park, S.; Ukawa, Y.; Kita, Y.; Suzuki, I. Antidiabetic Activity of Lyophyllum decastes in Genetically Type 2 Diabetic Mice. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2002, 25, 1234–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wei, Y.T.; Feng, N.; Zhan, J.S.; Han, W. Qualitative Chemical Analysis and Antitumor Activity of Lyophyllum decastes Fruit Body Extracts. J-GLOBAL. 2016, 23, 70–74. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ukawa, Y.; Furuichi, Y.; Kokean, Y.; Nishii, T.; Hisamatsu, M. Effect of Hatakeshimeji (Lyophyllum decastes Sing.) Mushroom on Serum Lipid Levels in Rats. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 2002, 48, 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xu, L.L.; Yang, W.J.; Qiu, T.M.; Gao, X.; Zhang, H.Y.; Zhang, S.L.; Cui, H.; Guo, L.Z.; Yu, H.L.; Yu, H. Complete genome sequences and comparative secretomic analysis for the industrially cultivated edible mushroom Lyophyllum decastes reveals insights on evolution and lignocellulose degradation potential. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tan, Q.; Song, C.Y. China Edible Fungus Seed Industry Development Report 2023; China Agriculture Press: Beijing, China, 2025; pp. 261–264. [Google Scholar]
  17. Woo, S.M.; Park, Y.H.; Yoo, Y.B.; Shin, P.G.; Jang, K.Y.; Lee, K.H.; Sung, J.M. Development on Artificial Cultivation method of Hatakeshimeji (Lyophyllum decastes) using fermented sawdust substrate. J. Mushroom Sci. Prod. 2009, 7, 156–162. [Google Scholar]
  18. Yoshihama, Y.; Kusakabe, K.; Matsui, S.; Morita, H. Biologically Pure Mushroom Culture and Method for Mushroom Cultivation. U.S. Patent 5349121, 13 December 1994. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wei, S.L.; Wang, Z.J.; Yu, H.P.; Chen, Y. Studies on Isolation and domestication characteristics of Lypphyllum decastes. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci. 2005, 14, 128–131. [Google Scholar]
  20. Qiu, C.L.; Chen, C.M.; Zhuo, Z.M.; Lu, X. A Strain of Black Brown Lyophyllum decastes and Its Application. China Patent 202310624496.9, 30 May 2023. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kimura, E. Factory cultivation of Lyophyllum decastes. Edible Med. Mushrooms 2019, 27, 237–240. [Google Scholar]
  22. Pan, H.Y.; Ning, T.Y.; Xu, Y.T.; Zhou, H.Y.; Xu, B. Breeding of high yield strains of Lyophyllum decastes. Edible Fungi China 2023, 42, 42–46. [Google Scholar]
  23. Liang, Q.Q.; Wei, S.L.; Ding, L.Q.; Yan, H.X.; Liang, Y.P.; Xi, Y.L. Mutational screening of Lyophyllum decastes with high Yield of Laccase and Characteristics of Laccase from the Mutant. Nat. Prod. Res. Dev. 2014, 26, 1178–1181. [Google Scholar]
  24. Liang, Q.Q.; Wei, S.L.; Wang, H.; Wang, X.Q.; Ding, L.Q.; Xi, Y.L. Breeding high polysaccharide producing of Lyophyllum decastes strains by protolplast mutagensis. Sci. Technol. Food Ind. 2013, 34, 178–181. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhou, H.M.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Xi, Y.L.; Wei, S.L. Screening of Lyophyllum decastes highly productive cultivable strains. Mycosystema 2014, 33, 208–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yin, L.L.; Yao, F.J.; Shi, C.Y.; Lu, L.X.; Wang, T.; Liu, W. Genetic diversity of wild Auricularia heimuer germplasm resources based on SSR markers. Acta Edulis Fungi 2022, 29, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhang, D.; Wu, P.; Zhang, L.J.; Tang, L.H.; Song, C.Y.; Shang, X.D.; Bao, D.P.; Tan, Q. Polymorphism of SSR markers based on the whole genime sequence of Lentinula edodes and use in strain identification. Acta Edulis Fungi 2012, 19, 7–10. [Google Scholar]
  28. GB/T 21125-2007; Technical Inspection for Mushroom Selecting and Breeding. National Standardization Administration: Beijing, China, 2007.
  29. Huang, J.; Ge, X.; Sun, M. Modified CTAB protocol using a silica matrix for isolation of plant genomic DNA. BioTechniques 2000, 28, 432–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pahlich, E.; Gerlitz, C. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemistry 1980, 19, 11–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vilgalys, R.; González, D. Organization of ribosomal DNA in the basidiomycete Thanatephorus praticola. Curr. Genet. 1990, 18, 277–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Katoh, K.; Standley, D. MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in Performance and Usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ma, J.X.; Ma, J.H.; Meng, H. The Strain ZJLZS002 of Lyophyllum decastes, and Its Application, SSR Molecular Marker Primer. China Patent 202410492240.1, 23 April 2024. [Google Scholar]
  34. NY/T 1845-2010; Identification of Distinctness for Edible Mushroom Cultivar by Antagonism. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China: Beijing, China, 2010.
  35. Liu, Q.M.; Hua, R.; Sun, D.F.; Zhang, J.B.; Li, J.Y.; Liu, C.L.; Luo, X.; Liu, S.X. Breeding of a New Cyclocybe chaxingu Cultivar ‘Zhongjunbaicha 1’. Acta Edulis Fungi 2023, 30, 57–66. [Google Scholar]
  36. GB5009.5-2016; Determination of Protein in Food of National Standard for Food Safety. China Food and Drug Administation: Beijing, China, 2016.
  37. GB5009.124-2016; Determination of Amino Acids in Food of National Standard for Food Safety. China Food and Drug Administation: Beijing, China, 2016.
  38. SN/T 4260-2015; Determination of Crude Polysaccharides in Plant Source Foods for Export-Phehol-Sulfuric Acid Colorimetry. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2015.
  39. Ellen, L.; Henrik, S. Lyophyllum shimeji, a species associated with lichen pine forest in northern Fennoscandia. Mycoscience 2011, 52, 289–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Moncalvo, J.M.; Vilgalys, R.; Redhead, S.A.; Johnson, J.E.; James, T.Y.; Catherine Aime, M.; Hofstetter, V.; Verduin, S.J.; Larsson, E.; Baroni, T.J.; et al. One hundred and seventeen clades of euagarics. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2002, 23, 357–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wei, S.W.; Qi, B.; Zhang, X.Z.; Peng, Z.W.; Li, Y.; Wang, Q. Global diversity and biogeography of Lyophyllum inferred from amplicon datasets. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2024, 12, 1328569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhu, X.K.; Zhang, Q.Y. Protection and development of the old skill “bark hacking method” of Lentinula edodes cultivation. Edible Med. Mushrooms 2019, 27, 96–98. [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang, Z.S.; Liao, J.H.; Chen, M.Y.; Cai, Z.X. Breeding and industrial development of Agaricus bisporus. Acta Edulis Fungi 2012, 19, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, S.Y. Mushroom Cultivation manual; Scientific and Technical Documents Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  45. Liu, Q. Fungus seed industry: A neglected new seed industry. China Dev. Obs. 2021, 14, 43–45. [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhao, J.; Wang, Y.F.; Sheng, C.G.; Shi, L.; Pan, C.L.; Wang, J.H.; Liu, Z.T.; Zhang, P.; Yu, H.Y.; Meng, X.H. The production status and development trend of edible fungi factory in China. For. By-Prod. Spec. China 2021, 174, 68–74. [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhou, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, C.X.; Yu, J.J. Breeding of high polysaccharide yield strains of Lyophyllum decastes by UV induced protoplast mutagenesis. Jiangsu Agric. Sci. 2017, 45, 126–128. [Google Scholar]
  48. Yuan, B.; Ke, L.N.; Chen, G.X.; Lian, Y.P.; Zhang, Z.H.; Ji, P.W.; Wu, Z.Q. Agaricus bisporus germplasms in southern Fujian identified by somatic incompatibility test and SSR. Fujian J. Agric. Sci. 2020, 35, 950–956. [Google Scholar]
  49. Gao, L.H.; Bao, D.P.; Xu, Z.; Li, Y.; Lu, H.; Tan, Y.S.; Shang, X.D.; Chen, H.Y.; Wang, R.J.; Wu, Y.Y. Construction of core collection and DNA fingerprinting of Flammulina filiformis based on genetic diversity analysis. Mycosystema 2021, 40, 3214–3230. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. A flow chart of selected breeding.
Figure 1. A flow chart of selected breeding.
Agriculture 15 01045 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis of Lyophyllum decastes and related species based on nuclear ribosomal large subunit. Calocybe vinacea was used as the outgroup.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis of Lyophyllum decastes and related species based on nuclear ribosomal large subunit. Calocybe vinacea was used as the outgroup.
Agriculture 15 01045 g002
Figure 3. Strains forming fruited bodies on the PDA enrichment medium. (a) Strain ZJLZS001; (b) strain ZJLZS002; (c) strain ZJLZS003; (d) strain ZJLZS007.
Figure 3. Strains forming fruited bodies on the PDA enrichment medium. (a) Strain ZJLZS001; (b) strain ZJLZS002; (c) strain ZJLZS003; (d) strain ZJLZS007.
Agriculture 15 01045 g003
Figure 4. Photos of fruiting. (a) Strain ZJLZS002; (b) strain ZJLZS003.
Figure 4. Photos of fruiting. (a) Strain ZJLZS002; (b) strain ZJLZS003.
Agriculture 15 01045 g004
Figure 5. Antagonistic reaction between ZJLZS002 (left) and LR-A (right).
Figure 5. Antagonistic reaction between ZJLZS002 (left) and LR-A (right).
Agriculture 15 01045 g005
Figure 6. Antibacterial test. (a) ZJLZS002 (left) and P. brevicompactum (right); (b) P. brevicompactum; (c) LR-A (left) and P. brevicompactum (right); (d) ZJLZS002 (left) and T. pleuroticola (right); (e) T. pleuroticola; (f) LR-A (left) and T. pleuroticola (right).
Figure 6. Antibacterial test. (a) ZJLZS002 (left) and P. brevicompactum (right); (b) P. brevicompactum; (c) LR-A (left) and P. brevicompactum (right); (d) ZJLZS002 (left) and T. pleuroticola (right); (e) T. pleuroticola; (f) LR-A (left) and T. pleuroticola (right).
Agriculture 15 01045 g006
Figure 7. Capillary electropherogram of ZJLZS002 and LR-A. (a) Amplification of ZJLZS002 with LD045; (b) amplification of LR-A with LD045; (c) amplification of ZJLZS002 with LD063; (d) amplification of LR-A with LD063; (e) amplification of ZJLZS002 with LD089; (f) amplification of LR-A with LD089; (g) amplification of ZJLZS002 with LD093; (h) amplification of LR-A with LD093; (i) amplification of ZJLZS002 with LD094; (j) amplification of LR-A with LD094; (k) amplification of ZJLZS002 with LD095; (l) amplification of LR-A with LD095; (m) amplification of ZJLZS002 with LD098; (n) amplification of LR-A with LD098; (o) amplification of ZJLZS002 with LD129; (p) amplification of LR-A with LD129; (q) amplification of ZJLZS002 with LD149; (r) amplification of LR-A with LD149; (s) amplification of ZJLZS002 with LD157; (t) amplification of LR-A with LD157.
Figure 7. Capillary electropherogram of ZJLZS002 and LR-A. (a) Amplification of ZJLZS002 with LD045; (b) amplification of LR-A with LD045; (c) amplification of ZJLZS002 with LD063; (d) amplification of LR-A with LD063; (e) amplification of ZJLZS002 with LD089; (f) amplification of LR-A with LD089; (g) amplification of ZJLZS002 with LD093; (h) amplification of LR-A with LD093; (i) amplification of ZJLZS002 with LD094; (j) amplification of LR-A with LD094; (k) amplification of ZJLZS002 with LD095; (l) amplification of LR-A with LD095; (m) amplification of ZJLZS002 with LD098; (n) amplification of LR-A with LD098; (o) amplification of ZJLZS002 with LD129; (p) amplification of LR-A with LD129; (q) amplification of ZJLZS002 with LD149; (r) amplification of LR-A with LD149; (s) amplification of ZJLZS002 with LD157; (t) amplification of LR-A with LD157.
Agriculture 15 01045 g007aAgriculture 15 01045 g007b
Figure 8. Industrial cultivation of ZJLZS002. (a) Fruiting for 15 days; (b) fruiting for 24 days.
Figure 8. Industrial cultivation of ZJLZS002. (a) Fruiting for 15 days; (b) fruiting for 24 days.
Agriculture 15 01045 g008
Figure 9. Dried and fresh fruiting bodies. (a) Dried fruiting bodies of ZJLZS002; (b) dried fruiting bodies of LR-A; (c) fresh fruiting bodies of ZJLZS002; (d) fresh fruiting bodies of LR-A.
Figure 9. Dried and fresh fruiting bodies. (a) Dried fruiting bodies of ZJLZS002; (b) dried fruiting bodies of LR-A; (c) fresh fruiting bodies of ZJLZS002; (d) fresh fruiting bodies of LR-A.
Agriculture 15 01045 g009
Table 1. Tested strains and their origins.
Table 1. Tested strains and their origins.
CodeStrain No.TaxonTypeOrigin of Resource
1ZJLZS001Lyophyllum decastesWildDandong City, Liaoning Province
2ZJLZS002Lyophyllum decastesWildDandong City, Liaoning Province
3ZJLZS003Lyophyllum decastesWildHohhot City, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region
4ZJLZS004Lyophyllum decastesWildYongping County, Yunnan Province
5ZJLZS005Lyophyllum decastesWildXinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region
6ZJLZS006Lyophyllum decastesWildYuxi County, Yunnan Province
7ZJLZS007Lyophyllum decastesWildLijiang City, Yunnan Province
8ZJLZS008Lyophyllum decastesWildDiqing Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture
9LR-ALyophyllum decastesCultivationJiangsu Hongsheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd.
Table 2. Information of 10 pairs of SSR primers.
Table 2. Information of 10 pairs of SSR primers.
Primer NameSize of Primer Fragment
LD045F: CCGCACAACACCTCAACAAG; R: TCGTCGCACAAAGAGCAGTA
LD063F: TCATCGGGACAAAGCCGAAA; R: GTCAACCCAAGCGACAACAC
LD089F: CCAAACAGTGCCGTTGAGTG; R: CTCCGGCGTTGAGTGACTAG
LD093F: TGGGTGTCGTTTGGGTATGG; R: CACGAGGACAGGCACATTCT
LD094F: GGGACGGAAGGGAAGGAAAG; R: TCTTTAACGCAGCGGTCCAT
LD095F: TGATGATGAGGCTTCGACGG; R: GTCACGACAACGCACTGTTC
LD098F: TCGGTGCGTAATCGTTTGGA; R: ATCGCCGCTTTCTGCAAATG
LD129F: CGTCGTTACATCGTTGACGC; R: TGGCACATCCATGAAGCAGT
LD149F: AAACTCAAGCTGTCCCGGTC; R: TCAAAGGAAGCTCCACCGAC
LD157F: ACGAGCTATTGGACGACCAC; R: TTTCGTTTCCACGCCGACTA
F stands for forward primer; R stands for reverse primer.
Table 3. The data employed in this study.
Table 3. The data employed in this study.
SpeciesVouchernrLSUReference
Lyophyllum decastesZJLZS001PV570115This study
L. decastesZJLZS002PV570116This study
L. decastesZJLZS003PV570117This study
L. decastesZJLZS004PV570118This study
L. decastesZJLZS005PV570119This study
L. decastesZJLZS006PV570120This study
L. decastesZJLZS007PV570121This study
L. decastesZJLZS008PV570122This study
L. decastesLR-APV570114This study
L. decastesSundberg091007aHM572548[39]
L. decastesF-855PQ652409Genbank
L. ambustumF-810PQ652355Genbank
L. fumosuLipovac090903HM572538[39]
L. shimejiEilertsen090908HM572531[39]
L. shimejiCBS 451.87AF223215[40]
L. shimejihaukebo1982HM572529[39]
Calocybe vinaceaHMJU 5135NG243053Genbank
Table 4. Preliminary screening results.
Table 4. Preliminary screening results.
StrainMycelium Growth Rate (cm/d)Growth VigorFruiting
ZJLZS0010.27 ± 0.01 bc+T
ZJLZS0020.35 ± 0.01 a+++T
ZJLZS0030.36 ± 0.04 a+++T
ZJLZS0040.31 ± 0.01 b++N
ZJLZS0050.3 ± 0.00 b++N
ZJLZS0060.3 ± 0.02 b++N
ZJLZS0070.27 ± 0.02 bc+T
ZJLZS0080.3 ± 0.02 b++N
+ Mycelium is thin and weak. ++ Mycelium is thin and general. +++ Mycelium is thick and strong. Lowercase letters indicate significant difference at p < 0.05. T stands for fruiting; N stands for non-fruiting.
Table 5. Rescreening results.
Table 5. Rescreening results.
StrainGrowth Period
/Day
Stipe CharacteristicsCap Diameter /mmSingle Fruit Mass/gYield
/(g·bag−1)
Biological Efficiency/%
Length
/cm
Upper Diameter
/mm
Bottom Diameter
/mm
ZJLZS00275.7 ± 1.5 b9.80 ± 0.3610.92 ± 0.33 a16.49 ± 1.00 a 33.89 ± 0.5716.00 ± 0.26374.67 ± 8.50 a93.67 ± 2.13 a
ZJLZS00380.7 ± 1.5 a10.73 ± 0.928.53 ± 0.72 b10.87 ± 0.11 b32.61 ± 1.1314.03 ± 1.76337.00 ± 21.0 b84.25 ± 6.00 b
Lowercase letters indicate significant difference at p < 0.05.
Table 6. Antibacterial rates of ZJLZS002 and LR-A.
Table 6. Antibacterial rates of ZJLZS002 and LR-A.
StrainP. brevicompactumT. pleuroticola
R1/cmR2/cmR1 − R2/cmE/%R1/cmR2/cmR1 − R2/cmE/%
ZJLZS0022.41.11.354.22.14.1248.8
LR-A2.41.60.833.33.24.10.921.9
R1 signifies the radius of mold growth under normal conditions, measured in centimeters; R2 represents the radius of mold growth in the two-point confrontation experiment, also in centimeters; E is the antibacterial rate.
Table 7. Comparison of amplified fragment sizes of ten primer pairs in ZJLZS002 and LR-A.
Table 7. Comparison of amplified fragment sizes of ten primer pairs in ZJLZS002 and LR-A.
Primer NameLR-AZJLZS002
LD045171(167, 169)
LD063(288, 290)281
LD089189192
LD093169162
LD094181158
LD095217200
LD098286(284, 299)
LD129(172, 187)(187, 190)
LD149206346
LD157135(142, 145)
Table 8. Biological efficiencies of ZJLZS002 and LR-A in intermediate test.
Table 8. Biological efficiencies of ZJLZS002 and LR-A in intermediate test.
StrainGrowth Period
/Day
Stipe CharactersCap Diameter/mmSingle Fruit Mass/gYield
/(g·bag−1)
Biological Efficiency/%
Length
/cm
Upper Diameter
/mm
Bottom Diameter
/mm
ZJLZS00275.6 ± 1.39.63 ± 0.49 b10.38 ± 0.48 a16.47 ± 0.53 a33.89 ± 0.6715.77 ± 0.95 a380 ± 3.6 a95 a
LR-A77.7 ± 1.510.9 ± 0.4 a7.87 ± 1.27 b10.93 ± 1.18 b33.87 ± 1.7211.5 ± 0.78 b345.7 ± 13.9 b86.4 b
Lowercase letters indicate significant difference at p < 0.05.
Table 9. Biological efficiencies of ZJLZS002 and LR-A in demonstration cultivation.
Table 9. Biological efficiencies of ZJLZS002 and LR-A in demonstration cultivation.
StrainBiological Efficiency of the First Group/%Biological Efficiency of the Second Group/%Biological Efficiency of the Third Group/%
121212
ZJLZS00295.17 ± 0.38 a94.5 ± 1.64 a94.75 ± 0.66 a94.92 ± 0.63 a94.67 ± 0.58 a95.92 ± 1.26 a
LR-A86.5 ± 3.19 b86.5 ± 2.54 b86.67 ± 3.15 b86.58 ± 3.26 b86.42 ± 2.98 b87.42 ± 3.36 b
Lowercase letters indicate significant difference at p < 0.05.
Table 10. Nutrient contents of ZJLZS002.
Table 10. Nutrient contents of ZJLZS002.
ItemZJLZS002UnitsItemZJLZS002Units
Asp1.27g/100 gProtein16.9g/100 g
Thr0.59g/100 gCrude fiber24.1%
Ser0.63g/100 gFat1.6g/100 g
Glu1.65g/100 gTotal reducing sugar55.6%
Pro0.45g/100 gPolysaccharide5.59g/100 g
Gly0.57g/100 gMg1217mg/kg
Ala0.64g/100 gSe0.08mg/kg
Val0.58g/100 gMn9.09mg/kg
Met0.13g/100 gZn40.3mg/kg
Ile0.55g/100 gFe93.2mg/kg
Leu0.77g/100 gCa28.7mg/kg
Tyr0.43g/100 gK4209mg/100 g
Phe0.54g/100 gNa21.8mg/100 g
His0.33g/100gCu6.7mg/kg
Lys1.46g/100 gP471mg/100 g
Arg0.72g/100 gVB21.37mg/100 g
Total amino acids11.31g/100 gVB64.57mg/kg
Moisture7.25g/100 gVB321mg/100 g
Ash content6.0g/100 g---
-: None.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Q.; Liu, S.; Li, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, F.; Luo, X.; Ma, J.; Hua, R.; Sun, D. High Resistance and Yield: A New Cultivar ‘ZJLZS002’ of Lyophyllum decastes Suitable for Industrial Cultivation. Agriculture 2025, 15, 1045. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15101045

AMA Style

Liu Q, Liu S, Li J, Zhang J, Zhou F, Luo X, Ma J, Hua R, Sun D. High Resistance and Yield: A New Cultivar ‘ZJLZS002’ of Lyophyllum decastes Suitable for Industrial Cultivation. Agriculture. 2025; 15(10):1045. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15101045

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Qimeng, Shaoxiong Liu, Jianying Li, Junbo Zhang, Fan Zhou, Xi Luo, Jianxiong Ma, Rong Hua, and Dafeng Sun. 2025. "High Resistance and Yield: A New Cultivar ‘ZJLZS002’ of Lyophyllum decastes Suitable for Industrial Cultivation" Agriculture 15, no. 10: 1045. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15101045

APA Style

Liu, Q., Liu, S., Li, J., Zhang, J., Zhou, F., Luo, X., Ma, J., Hua, R., & Sun, D. (2025). High Resistance and Yield: A New Cultivar ‘ZJLZS002’ of Lyophyllum decastes Suitable for Industrial Cultivation. Agriculture, 15(10), 1045. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15101045

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop