Next Article in Journal
Perspectives on Effective Long-Term Management of Carbon Stocks in Chernozem under Future Climate Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Symbiosis—A Perspective on the Effects of Host Traits and Environmental Parameters in Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Richness, Colonization and Ecological Functions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Design and Implementation of Internet of Things (IoT) Platform Targeted for Smallholder Farmers: From Nepal Perspective

1
Telecommunication Engineering School, University of Malaga, 29071 Malaga, Spain
2
School of Computer Science and Engineering, RV University, Bengaluru 560059, India
3
Institute of Oceanic Engineering Research, University of Malaga, 29071 Malaga, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2023, 13(10), 1900; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101900
Submission received: 31 August 2023 / Revised: 22 September 2023 / Accepted: 25 September 2023 / Published: 28 September 2023

Abstract

:
Nepal, a lower-middle-income country in South Asia, predominantly features smallholder farming communities operating on modest land holdings. These smallholders often adhere to traditional farming methods, relying on familial labor, which has become increasingly inefficient in contemporary agricultural landscapes. To enhance their productivity and efficiency, smallholder farmers require affordable and accessible Internet of Things (IoT)-based systems. However, the prevailing IoT solutions in the market primarily cater to large-scale commercial enterprises, rendering them unsuitable for the specific needs and constraints faced by smallholder farmers. In response to this gap, we have introduced a cost-effective, customizable, scalable, and dependable IoT platform tailored expressly for smallholder farmers. This platform empowers them to visualize, monitor, and control real-time data pertaining to their crops, livestock, and other agricultural assets. To ascertain the efficacy and suitability of our proposed platform, we conducted a comparative analysis with existing counterparts such as Blynk IoT and ThingSpeak IoT, evaluating their respective features and application services against standard requirements. Additionally, we subjected our platform to rigorous server load testing, assessing crucial performance parameters including throughput, response time, user capacity, and data sampling rates. Over an observation period spanning an average of 339 days, our platform successfully processed and stored a substantial volume of data, encompassing 817,633 sensor messages, averaging 2412 messages per day, with a cumulative storage size of 14,238.28 KB. Extrapolating from these results, it is noteworthy that an A0 instance with 20 GB of cloud space can adequately accommodate 200 users at a rate of 100 MB per user, which is adequate for the smallholder needs. Furthermore, the purposed platform was deployed inside a polyhouse to perform off-season grafting of citrus plants. The achieved success rate of 84% closely approached the success rate of 90–95% observed during on-season grafting. These empirical findings, coupled with the extensive data gathered during our research, underscore the reliability and performance of our proposed IoT platform for smallholder farmers.

1. Introduction

The Internet of Things (IoT) is an emerging technology which has been significantly increasing recently in many application domains such as smart cities, industrial manufacturing, home automation, precision agriculture, the health industry, wearables, etc. The IoT-based system includes a network of different sensors and actuators that can be integrated into the cloud service using the internet. Cloud-based applications and services can be accessed using network-enabled devices like smartphones, laptops, and other digital devices anytime, anywhere. IoT-based systems in agriculture can assist farmers in streamlining their labor and managing their resources efficiently. The information about the weather, soil properties, fertilizer, pests, and other variables can be obtained in real time using an IoT-based system [1,2,3]. Smallholder farmers in many lower-middle-income countries play a crucial role in global food production [4]. However, limited technological resources and access to information are the most challenging issues they often face. With the rising number of industries utilizing IoT, the agriculture sector is also one potential industry that can benefit significantly from IoT. On the other hand, designing a reliable, affordable IoT platform suitable for agricultural farms for smallholder farmers of middle- and lower-income countries with limited resources is always challenging [4,5].
The essential components of IoT-based systems in agriculture include sensor networks, edge computing, and cloud computing. The sensor network collects data on weather conditions, soil moisture, and crop growth and controls irrigation systems. Edge computing processes and analyses sensor data close to the field. Cloud computing can store and analyze data from sensor networks and other IoT-based systems.

1.1. Challenges and Opportunities of IoT in Agriculture for Smallholder Farmers: In Context of Nepal

Most of the farmers in Nepal are smallholder farmers with modest land holdings [6]. Smallholder farmers are also most of the agricultural labor force, accounting for more than 80% of all farm production. Despite being an agrarian country, the majority of the agricultural products are imported. The traditional way of farming solely relying on manual labor has not been productive these days. The rising cost of production, on the other hand, the shortage of manpower severely affects overall agricultural production. This has not only demotivated them to preserve their farming tradition but also significantly impacted their socio-economic status. The departure of the youth for foreign employment, the concept of a lower mindset for agriculture business, and the lack of access to technology and information have led to un-cultivating acres of land.
In this context, the IoT system could revolutionize how smallholder farmers manage their farms. There are, however, challenges to its implementation. One of the main challenges is the cost of deploying and maintaining IoT-based systems. Another challenge is the limited technical capacity of smallholder farmers, who may need more skills or resources to use IoT-based methods [7] effectively. Several factors can make IoT in agriculture for smallholder farmers in Nepal differ from other regions. Nepal’s geographical location, topography, and climate can make farming in Nepal challenging. Many smallholder farmers in Nepal may need more access to capital, credit, and technology, which can affect the adoption and use of IoT. The lack of infrastructure, such as reliable electricity and internet connectivity, can limit the potential benefits of IoT in agriculture for smallholder farmers in Nepal. The cost of implementation and deployment of IoT systems is another potential challenge. Technical expertise and know-how of IoT devices and their operation is also a significant challenge. The agricultural practices and crops grown in Nepal may differ from other regions. Despite these challenges, the potential benefits of IoT for smallholder farmers in Nepal are significant, including increased efficiency, improved yield, reduced costs, and access to markets. For many years, the Nepal government has been focusing on improving agricultural production and commercialization by introducing some key plans and strategies. The government’s recent initiative is the Prime Minister Agriculture Modernization Project, Agricultural Development Strategy (2015–2035), which aims to implement modern technology to enhance agricultural productivity and commercialization [8]. With these initiatives and motivation, smallholder farmers will gradually start using the technology, familiarizing themselves with its operation and benefits. However, close coordination with the Government, local bodies, and communities is needed to overcome the challenges of understanding their specific needs and to ensure that the system is relevant to their needs.

1.2. Real Use Case Scenario from Smallholder’s Perspective

The proposed IoT platform for smallholder farmers presents compelling real-world applications across various agricultural scenarios. These applications include:
  • Mushroom Farming: Mushroom cultivation is a popular endeavor among smallholder farmers in Nepal due to its quick turnaround and profitability. The IoT platform can play a pivotal role in mushroom farming by enabling precise control of environmental factors such as darkness, temperature, and humidity, which are critical for successful mushroom growth.
  • Polyhouse Tunnel Agriculture: The adoption of polyhouse tunnels for tomato cultivation is on the rise. Within these controlled environments, the IoT platform offers effective management of climatic conditions and irrigation, ultimately leading to increased productivity and higher profits for farmers.
  • Nursery Operations (Fruit and Flower Plants): Grafting fruit and flower plants in a nursery demands meticulous internal microclimate control. The IoT platform provides an ideal solution for managing these conditions, ensuring optimal growth and development of plants.
  • Poultry Farming: A significant number of smallholder farmers in Nepal operate small-scale poultry farms. The IoT platform facilitates real-time remote monitoring of crucial parameters within the poultry farm, including temperature, humidity, and air quality. It can also be employed to automate feed and water systems. Additionally, real-time heating, cooling, and lighting systems can be automated to optimize energy consumption.
  • Farm Security and Access Control: Ensuring security and controlled access to a farmer’s premises is of paramount importance. The IoT platform can be harnessed for this purpose, integrating sensors and actuators such as motion sensors and alarms. These elements provide early intrusion detection and facilitate prompt responses to safeguard the farm.
Incorporating the IoT platform into these agricultural contexts not only enhances the precision and efficiency of farming practices, but also empowers smallholder farmers in Nepal to achieve better yields, improved profitability, and enhanced security measures, ultimately contributing to the sustainable growth of their agricultural endeavors. In essence, this research not only identifies the unique demands and challenges faced by smallholder farmers in resource-constrained developing countries, but also offers a tangible solution in the form of a deployable, cost-efficient, and reliable IoT platform. By rigorously evaluating its features and performance, this study contributes to the advancement of agricultural technology, particularly in contexts where smallholder farmers play a pivotal role in sustaining local and national food production.
The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 discusses the related work. Material and methods are discussed in Section 3. Section 4 discusses the results, and Section 5 concludes the research with possible future directions.

2. Related Work

Doshi et al. developed a smart farming prototype using a third-party cloud application that connects various agriculture sensors and displays sensor data on the farmer’s smartphone [9]. Ayaz et al., in their article, highlighted the potential use and challenges of wireless sensors and IoT in agriculture. Authors have also analyzed the IoT devices and communication techniques associated with agriculture applications [10]. Nigussie et al. propose an “IoT-based irrigation management for smallholder farmers in rural sub-Saharan Africa” and found that an IoT-based irrigation management system can significantly improve the efficiency and effectiveness of irrigation for smallholder farmers in rural sub-Saharan Africa. The study conducted in Ethiopia showed that the system was able to reduce water use by 60% while maintaining or increasing crop yields. The design provided farmers with real-time information on soil moisture levels and weather conditions, allowing them to make informed decisions about when and how much to irrigate [11]. Dahane et al. present low-cost smart farming for enhancing the irrigation efficiency of smallholder farmers. The study conducted in Algeria showed that the system using low-cost sensors and a mobile application provided real-time data and feedback to farmers, reducing water consumption by up to 50% while maintaining or increasing crop yields. The authors suggest that IoT-based smart farming systems can significantly enhance irrigation efficiency but require careful attention to affordability, accessibility, local context, and collaboration between stakeholders [12]. Bayih et al. describe a case study in Ethiopia where an IoT and wireless sensor network (WSN)-based system was implemented for smallholder farmers to monitor and control their irrigation and fertilization practices. The system used low-cost sensors and a web-based platform to provide real-time data and feedback to farmers. The study found that the system could significantly improve crop yields, reduce water usage, and increase fertilizer efficiency while reducing labor costs and minimizing environmental impact [13].
Maraveas et al. review studies on IoT-based greenhouse monitoring and control systems which use sensors and actuators to collect and adjust environmental factors. These systems can improve crop growth and quality, energy efficiency, and resource management. The authors suggest that these systems can enhance the sustainability and profitability of greenhouse agriculture, but implementation requires careful attention to issues such as affordability, reliability, scalability, and collaboration between stakeholders [14]. Lufyagila et al. discuss using an IoT-powered system to monitor environmental conditions in a poultry house in Tanzania. The study deployed a low-cost system with sensors to monitor temperature, humidity, and air quality and a cloud-based data storage and analysis platform. The results showed that the system effectively improved animal health and productivity, was user friendly and accessible, and highlighted the importance of sustainable technologies in developing countries agricultural sectors [15]. Quayson et al. introduce a framework for technology for good social foundations in sustainable supply chains, emphasizing the importance of a supportive environment for smallholder farmers, including access to technology, training, and market incentives. The research highlights the potential for technology-based interventions to improve social and environmental outcomes and calls for future research to ensure inclusivity for smallholder farmers in developing countries [16]. Cheng et al. present a study on the development and implementation of an intelligent agriculture system that utilizes IoT technology in Taiwan. The system includes environmental monitoring sensors and a cloud-based data analysis platform. The study results showed that the system improved crop yields and resource management while being user friendly and accessible. The researchers suggest that the system has the potential to improve sustainability and profitability in agriculture by reducing resource use and increasing productivity. Further system development could include automated irrigation and fertilization [17].
Oliveira-Jr et al. discuss a case study on developing and deploying an IoT-based sensing platform for e-Agriculture in Mozambique. The platform included environmental monitoring sensors and a cloud-based data analysis platform. The study showed that the platform was effective in improving crop yields and resource management and being user friendly and accessible. The researchers suggest that the platform could be further developed to include weather forecasting and crop disease management, which could reduce crop losses. The study highlights the potential of IoT technology for e-Agriculture in Africa and provides insights for future research and development in other regions and for other crops [18]. Sekaran et al. developed a smart agricultural management system using IoT. This method gathers agriculture data from sensors from the fields. It creates results for ranchers, is essential for observing harvest development, and diminishes their time and energy. The information gathered from the field is stored in the cloud and field control is achieved by using IoT gadgets. The idea introduced in the paper could expand the efficiency of the harvests by decreasing the wastage of assets used in agribusiness fields [19]. Agricultural IoT solutions can help the sector improve operational efficiency, save costs, minimize waste, and enhance product quality.
Haque et al. developed secure IoT devices for the smart agriculture system. Smart agriculture based on the IoT is a system that uses sensors to monitor irrigation activities and automate crop production in the agricultural field. Farmers may monitor the state of their land from any location [20]. Bera et al. presented an intelligent precession Agriculture, where drones can be used to collect the sensor data and send to a ground server station. The data are secured using block chain-based authentication [21].
Jiang et al. described the deep learning approaches for apple fruit detection in agriculture. Deep learning, which demonstrates its ability in fruit handling and grouping, is utilized to arrange apples. The profound neural organization with various convolution layers and individual neurons is analyzed and assessed [22]. Bu et al. introduced a smart IoT agriculture system with deep learning reinforcement integrated in the cloud server for smart decisions, like how much water is required for the better growth of the crop [23]. Parvathi et al. proposed an intelligent agriculture management system to improve agricultural benefits and crop production. The goal is to use IoT and automate the task. It is intended to perform weeding, water system, detecting mugginess, endeavoring to alarm birds and animals, keeping up with reconnaissance, and so forth, to control the geolocation of gadgets from a distance [24]. Katanga et al. proposed an IoT-based, cost-effective hardware solution using voice-activated technology, centered around the ESP8266 NodeMCU micro-controller. It enables home automation via voice commands through Google Assistant and IFTTT integration and offers agricultural monitoring with soil moisture, temperature, and humidity analysis. The system efficiently manages water flow based on soil conditions and utilizes Wi-Fi for data transfer to cloud storage (Thingspeak) and the Blynk IoT platform [25,26].
Most of the work mentioned above has been concentrated on applications that either use more complicated systems or depend on third-party applications unsuitable for smallholder farmers. Smallholder farmers in low- and middle-income countries face multiple challenges in adopting the existing IoT architecture, including high costs, inadequate infrastructure, technical complexity, limited customization, and difficulties in maintenance and support. Consequently, a more affordable, user friendly, and customized IoT solution is required to cater to their unique needs and boost their productivity and livelihoods.

3. Materials and Methods

The methodology for implementing IoT architecture in agriculture for smallholder farmers follows a systematic approach that encompasses the following steps:
  • Comprehensive literature review: A thorough review of current IoT applications in agriculture is conducted, including potential applications for smallholder farmers and challenges and opportunities associated with implementing IoT in smallholder agriculture.
  • Design of the IoT architecture: The IoT architecture is designed specifically for smallholder farmers, considering their limited resources and technical capacity. Localization, customization, reliability, affordability, and scalability are considered during the architecture design.
  • Data collection, analysis, and field testing: Field IoT sensor devices are used to collect data, which are analyzed to assess the effectiveness of the proposed IoT architecture in addressing research objectives and questions. The proposed IoT architecture is deployed and tested in research stations and with smallholder farmers to ensure its effectiveness, reliability, and ease of use.
  • Evaluation of the architecture: The proposed IoT architecture is evaluated in terms of reliability, cost, and usability for smallholder farmers and compared to existing solutions.

3.1. Key Requirements

The following key requirements of the smallholder farmers are identified during the design of IoT System architecture. The key requirements are obtained by directly conversing with farmers, agriculturists, researchers, literature review, interviews, and articles.
Low cost and availability of the hardware: The IoT devices and sensors used in the platform should be low cost and readily available in the local market to be affordable for smallholder farmers.
  • Reliable connectivity: The platform should have a reliable and robust connectivity infrastructure, such as wireless networks and cellular networks, to ensure that data can be transmitted and received in real time.
  • Data management: The platform should be able to collect, store, and analyze data from IoT devices and make the data available to farmers in an easy-to-use format.
  • Scalability: The platform should be scalable and adaptable to the changing needs of smallholder farmers and their communities.
  • User-friendly interface: The platform should have a user-friendly interface that is easy for farmers to understand and use without requiring extensive technical knowledge.
  • Security: The platform should use robust security measures to protect the data and devices in the system, as well as the privacy of the farmers.
  • Localization: The platform should be localized in the sense it must use hardware and software components that are easily available, and consider the specific needs and conditions of smallholder farmers for the target region.
  • Community engagement: The platform should be designed to empower smallholder farmers to adopt and get trained by involving them in the design and operation of the platform and by providing them with relevant and useful information that can help them improve their livelihoods.
  • Data visualization: The platform should provide farmers with easy-to-use tools for accessing and interpreting the data, such as dashboards and visualizations, to help them make better-informed decisions about farming practices.
  • Power efficiency: The platform should use low-power hardware to be power efficient, especially in remote and rural areas where farmers cannot access grid power and rely on solar or battery backup.

3.2. Description of the Proposed Customized IoT Architecture and Platform for Smallholder Farmers

The essence of the custom IoT platform lies in its adaptability to the unique needs of individual smallholder farmers engaged in diverse forms of farming. This platform has been meticulously crafted to accommodate a broad spectrum of requirements within a single unified IoT framework. Key facets such as user-friendly application interfaces, concise training sessions for seamless operation, straightforward deployment procedures, and accessible local maintenance and support services have been prioritized to facilitate the widespread adoption of this IoT platform.
The research outlined in this endeavor offers significant contributions to the field, which can be succinctly summarized as follows:
  • Requirements and Challenge Identification: The study has effectively identified the multifaceted requirements and challenges associated with designing and implementing an IoT platform tailored for smallholder farmers in developing countries, especially considering resource constraints. By comprehensively understanding these needs and barriers, the research lays a solid foundation for targeted IoT development.
  • Deployable, Cost-Efficient, and Reliable IoT Platform: The research has culminated in the creation of a practical, cost-effective, and dependable IoT platform specifically crafted for smallholder agricultural farms in a developing nation like Nepal. This platform’s design not only aligns with the limited resource capacities prevalent in such regions but also ensures its viability and efficacy in real-world agricultural settings.
  • Evaluation of Features and Application Performance: A thorough evaluation of the proposed IoT platform has been conducted in comparison to existing systems. This assessment encompasses a detailed examination of its features and application performance, providing valuable insights into its capabilities and potential advantages over existing solutions.
The proposed IoT architecture for smallholder agriculture incorporates a sensor network, edge computing, and cloud computing to collect and process field data. The architecture is designed to be low cost and user friendly, enabling smallholder farmers to access it with limited resources. Additionally, it is scalable to meet the changing needs of farmers. Figure 1 illustrates the customized IoT platform approach for smart agriculture.
The proposed IoT system stands out for its customization capabilities, allowing users to select application services tailored to their specific needs. This flexibility extends to sensor and switch services, where users have the freedom to configure their system as per their preferences. For instance, one user might opt for three sensors and two switch services, while another may require two or three switch-based services. Furthermore, the architectural framework incorporates a discussion forum, serving as a valuable platform where experts can address general user inquiries and offer remote support and guidance.
Overview of User Application and Services:
The user-centric application and service structure of the proposed system can be summarized as follows:
  • Role-Based Access: Administrators play a pivotal role by creating distinct roles for end users, encompassing smallholder farmers, custom users, scientists, and data analysts.
  • Device Deployment: End users possess the capability to set up IoT sensor devices and controllers within their agricultural fields, ensuring seamless integration with their operations.
  • Data Management: Data generated by diverse IoT sensors undergo meticulous collection, processing, and transmission to a cloud server. This data repository is accessible to data analysts, experts, and scientists who can offer valuable insights and feedback.
  • Customized Service Applications: End users leverage customized service applications, empowering them with the tools needed for real-time monitoring and control of their systems.
Key Features within the Proposed System:
The architectural design of the proposed system prioritizes features identified as pivotal for smallholder farmers. These essential features encompass:
  • Real-time Data Monitoring and Visualization: Farmers gain the ability to access and act upon real-time sensor data, enabling them to visually monitor field conditions at predetermined intervals. This capability facilitates real-time tracking and visualization for various agricultural parameters, including temperature, humidity, light intensity, pH levels, tank water levels, soil moisture, and more.
  • I-Switch Control: The “i-Switch” application empowers farmers to remotely activate electrical and electronic devices and appliances through custom-designed web and mobile applications. This service is particularly advantageous for areas like greenhouses, polyhouses, and irrigation fields, where automation and control are essential. I-Switch ensures precise regulation of the internal microclimate by controlling exhaust fans, fogging systems, heating, and cooling, thereby maintaining the desired temperature, humidity, and moisture levels.
  • GPS Tracking: This feature aids in tracking the movement of agricultural logistics and machinery through GPS sensors. The GPS sensor data are transmitted to the cloud, where they is mapped and displayed in a browser and mobile application, providing real-time visibility of agricultural assets.
  • Alerts and Messaging: Users receive timely alerts and messages via email and SMS, notifying them of any events that surpass predefined thresholds. This feature ensures users stay well informed and up to date regarding their agricultural operations.
  • Data Logging and Analytics: Sensor data are consistently logged and securely stored in both cloud-based databases and local storage, offering users the flexibility to export data to local computers. Additionally, data analysts, scientists, and researchers can access this repository for in-depth analysis and provide valuable feedback. The stored data are easily retrievable and amenable to customized analysis.
  • Discussion Forum: Smallholder farmers benefit from a dedicated discussion forum, fostering connections and communication with peers, research scientists, data analysts, and other stakeholders. This service facilitates the exchange of text and image-based queries and suggestions, streamlining the sharing and acquisition of critical information.
  • Onsite and Online Data Logging Architecture: To surmount the challenges posed by unreliable internet connections, the proposed architecture ingeniously combines onsite and online data logging. This hybrid approach, guarantees data availability on local storage devices complete with timestamps, even in the absence of a stable internet connection. Figure 2 shows the Onsite and online data log architecture.

3.3. Hardware and Application Design Components

The proposed system incorporates various components to create an IoT architecture that can collect, analyze, and act on data from the smallholder. These components include a microcontroller unit, sensors, actuators, a gateway, network connectivity, data storage, a cloud platform, and a mobile/web application.
The proposed architecture uses a low-cost, low-power, open-source microcontroller unit nodemcu esp8266 with a Wi-Fi module embedded in it. It consists of 17 general purpose input output pins. It supports digital and analog I/O with 11 pins and 1 pin, respectively. In addition to this, there are pins to support UART, I2C, and SPI interface. The wireless network connectivity has the ability to create its own network, a maximum clock speed of 160 MHz with 128 KB of RAM, and 4MB flash memory, which are good choices for the proposed system design. The gateway serves as the device that connects the sensors and actuators to the internet. The proposed architecture is based on Wi-Fi and mobile cellular network connectivity. The network topology is a star topology, where all the sensor nodes are connected to the central Wi-Fi router. This topology is more suitable for the proposed system as the smallholder farmers usually require 3–5 sensors and actuators in response to our research question. The range of Wi-Fi is 100 m in line of sight and if required can be extended by using another nodemcu as a relay module.
Sensors such as temperature, humidity, soil moisture, light, pH, and Global Positioning System (GPS) can be integrated into the architecture to collect environmental data. Actuators like motors, valves, or relays can control various aspects of the smallholder’s operation, such as irrigation or climate control systems. Data collected by the sensors are stored locally in a microSD card and sent to the cloud for reliable data storage. After comparing various cloud services and their associated cost and features, Microsoft Azure is chosen as the cloud platform to host the application and cloud storage. Both a web server-based application and android-based mobile application are developed to access the IoT platform. The reason for choosing Microsoft Azure cloud services is due to its cost effectiveness and scalability.
Similarly, many local smallholder farmers use android-powered devices to access the internet. The proposed architecture provides services in both web-based applications as well as in mobile applications. Time-series data visualization and a graphical dashboard interface are integrated for analytics and visualization. All these components integrate together to enable the smallholder to make data-driven decisions about managing their operation. The client-side hardware set-up is depicted in Figure 3.
Platform Application Design:
Our system application has been thoughtfully designed to cater to both web and mobile platforms, using a robust client-server-based architecture. Within this framework, every user is allocated a personalized dashboard, granting them immediate access to real-time monitoring and control capabilities. Furthermore, users have the flexibility to extract time-series data for in-depth data analytics.
User-Centric Architecture:
The architectural blueprint of our user registration system application is visually represented in Figure 4, providing a comprehensive overview of how user interaction and data flow are seamlessly integrated.

3.4. Multi-Platform Application and User Interface

Our system application has been meticulously crafted to seamlessly function on both web and mobile platforms, leveraging a robust client-server-based architecture. Each user is endowed with a bespoke dashboard, providing them with real-time access to viewing, monitoring, and controlling of their application. Furthermore, users have the capability to export time-series data for conducting in-depth data analytics. The implementation of our proposed IoT system unfolds in two distinct phases: user registration and system application. During the user registration phase, user profiles are established, and the requisite hardware, encompassing IoT devices and sensors, is precisely configured in alignment with their unique service prerequisites. In the subsequent system application phase, users are seamlessly directed to their dedicated user applications, meticulously tailored to their preferences. This empowers them to take action, monitor real-time data, and promptly engage in data analysis.
Dynamic Data Visualization:
The presentation of data visualization takes on various forms, exemplified in the following figures: Figure 5 showcases the web application dashboard, offering the user a comprehensive view of three essential sensor parameters: temperature, humidity, and water level. Additionally, it grants control over a pivotal switch service, the water pump.
Figure 6 exhibits the mobile application dashboard, ensuring that users can access critical data and control functions conveniently via their mobile devices. Figure 7 and Table 1 introduce the visualization of time-series data and the accompanying data export template. This facilitates users in exporting stored data on various time intervals, be it hourly, weekly, monthly, or within specified date ranges.

3.5. Reliability and Performance Monitoring

After developing the proposed architecture and system design, various custom application services were tested to evaluate their performance and reliability. To simulate real-world scenarios, users were created and assigned custom application services that are frequently required. Additionally, IoT devices were configured and installed by the users. The application services, update interval, and observed period are summarized in Table 2. Analysis of the observation data revealed that the system remained highly reliable throughout the observed period.
This work demonstrates the design and implementation of the potential of IoT platforms for enhancing agricultural operations among smallholder farmers in Nepal, where the utilization of IoT in agriculture currently needs to be improved. The proposed IoT architecture effectively provides smallholder farmers with real-time data, thereby improving the efficiency and productivity of their agricultural operations. This study offers a model for other smallholder farmers to adopt while also providing insights into the challenges and opportunities associated with implementing IoT in smallholder agriculture. In particular, the study highlights the proposed IoT platform’s affordability, reliability, scalability, data management, ease of operation, and localization benefits. These findings have important implications for the future development of IoT-based agricultural systems that cater to the unique needs of smallholder farmers in Nepal and other similar contexts.
Our developed system is hosted on the website https://www.medhayantra.com (accessed on 25 July 2023) and is accessible to everyone. For the real-time implementation Medhayantra has been collaborating with renowned agriculture research stations, including the National Agriculture Research Center (NARC), Nepal, National Citrus Research Program (NCRP), Nepal, Regional Agriculture Research Center (RARS), and various others. This collaboration has allowed Medhayantra to acquire invaluable insights into the latest research and development within the agriculture industry, which have been effectively incorporated into the company’s range of products and services. Figure 8 depicts some of the implementation sites.

4. Results Discussion

The performance and comparison section below highlights the proposed system’s important features, services, and performance. The cost analysis is performed for the proposed method based on the number of users and upgrade plan. The data storage analysis and server load test are performed to determine parameters like data file size, sample size, throughput, and response time. During this average observation period of 339 days a total of 817,633 messages were stored in the cloud by different devices. This provides an average of messages per day = 817,633/339, which is rounded to 2412 messages/day. The total storage file size recorded is 14,238.28 kB. Azure A0 instance has a capacity of 20 GB, demonstrating that the capacity can be extended to 20 GB/14,238.28 kB about 1473 times. This indicates that, if one user is allocated 50 MB of storage, approximately 400 users can be accommodated. The server load test is performed to find the throughput for 120 users over the interval. The server load test is conducted using an Apache J meter version 5.5. The subsequent Section 4.1 to 4.3 discuss the server load test, and the performance comparison with the Blynk IoT platform and ThingSpeak platform and cost analysis, respectively. One of the real implementations of the platform was used to control the internal microclimate of the polyhouse for grafting Acid lime (Sunkagati-1) citrus fruit during the offseason (July–August). Citrus fruits are one of the major cultivated plants and have attracted many farmers in Nepal as it has a good return. Grafting of citrus plants is done only once a year due to the prevailing climate condition. However, the supply of grafted plants is not adequate to meet the demand [27]. An off-season grafting controlling the internal microclimate can help to produce more grafted plants. The grafting parameters are shown in Table 3. The average grafting success rate is found to be nearly 84 percent which is close to on-season grafting (December–February) where the grafting success rate is reported to be around 90 to 95 percent.

4.1. Server Load Test

We have conducted the server load test to check the performance of our system using Apache JMeter version 5.5 software. Table 4 shows the server load test for different numbers of users for the various parameters: response time, throughput, and the network sent and received. Overall, the load test results demonstrate that increasing the number of users leads to higher server load, longer response times, and reduced network traffic. Figure 9 shows the server load test data for the different numbers of users.

4.2. Performance Comparisons

We have taken two similar IoT platforms, Blynk [28] and Thingspeak [29], for comparative analysis. The comparative chart for the existing platforms, the proposed system features, and plans are shown in Figure 10, Figure 11, and Figure 12, respectively. The features of the proposed system are listed in Table 5.
Figure 12 shows the performance comparison of the proposed system with different plans. For scalability and performance enhancement, the X5 plan is included, which support more users with enhanced features. The cost analysis for the X5 plan is derived based on the fact that the architecture is scalable; hence, the only change is to upgrade the cloud service instance from A0 to A2. The A2 instance has 2 processor cores with 3.5 GB RAM and 490 GB storage in contrast to the A0 instance, which runs in 1 processor core, 0.75 GB RAM, and 20 GB storage. The Blynk Plan offers medium complexity with support for applications, widgets, and some data streaming capabilities. The ThingSpeak Plan is geared towards more complex projects with better scalability, advanced technical support, and data export options. The proposed system has a lower level of complexity but offers a range of features, including web and mobile app support, data storage, security, and customization options.

4.3. Cost Analysis

We have taken the important features of both platforms for comparative analysis. The proposed IoT platform is hosted in Azure A0 instance to experiment. The pricing and parameters of Azure instances, which could be potential use for scalability for our platform, are shown in Table 6. We have conducted a server load test to determine the throughput, latency, and reliability.
We have incorporated the essential features in our platform required for smallholder farmers’ applications. In addition to proposing an IoT system, we have conducted a cost analysis for its deployment based on the number of users who can utilize the shared platform. The associated costs, calculated using contemporary local pricing, are listed in Table 7. The number of users share the variable application development cost.
The cost/user per annum is calculated as Cloud service cost + Connectivity cost + Application development cost + Support and update cost = NPR (Nepali Rupees) 4000 + NPR 450 + NPR 2321 + NPR 2000 = NPR 8771 (USD 272.73). The average cost is estimated as the total application Development cost/Number of users, i.e., 1,880,000/270, approx. 6963, further spread over 36 months and results in NPR (Nepali Rupees) 193.4 per user. Considering the number of users as 100, the total estimated cost per user per annum for average service remains Cloud service cost + Connectivity cost + Application development cost + Support and update cost = NPR 500 + NPR 450 + NPR 2320 + NPR 2000 = NPR 5270 (USD 39.9).
Based on Figure 13, it can be observed that the cost of deploying IoT systems significantly decreases as the number of users increases. This reduction in cost makes it affordable for smallholder farmers to invest in such systems, enabling them to manage their farms effectively. The reliability and durability of the system are observed by deploying the IoT device using this platform. The comparative cost analysis for 100 users is tabulated in Table 8. It is found that the proposed system cost indicates approximately 5 times and 18 times less compared to the Blynk and thing Speak platform.
The system’s data export function allows users to download data from the cloud to their local device. Seven devices were deployed to calculate the cloud storage and file size of the sensor data over time. Each device logged sensor data to the cloud at regular intervals. The stored data are downloaded to the local machine. Table 9 represents the number of transactions, messages, and file size.

4.4. Limitations of the Study

The limitations of this study include the limited sample size. The study is conducted on a limited number of users, and the results may not be generalizable to all smallholder farmers. Another limitation is the cost of the proposed solution for a very limited service application that may be a barrier for some smallholder farmers to adopt the solution.

5. Conclusions

This research aimed to identify the specific needs to design and implement an IoT platform in agriculture specifically tailored to the needs and resources of smallholder farmers of lower and middle incoming countries like Nepal. The proposed IoT architecture includes a combination of sensor networks, edge computing, and cloud computing and is designed to be low cost and easy to use. The research included a literature review, design of the IoT architecture, data collection, data analysis, and field testing. The developed system features and performances are evaluated with the existing system and found to be low cost, has inclusive features, and is reliable. Moreover, the proposed platform incorporates an offline data logging system in situations when internet connectivity is lost, which is an additional feature compared to the existing systems. In an observation for an average period of 339 days a total of 817,633 sensor messages are stored in the cloud server which accounts for, on average, 2512 messages/day. The storage file size recorded for this period is 14,238.28 KB. We are using Azure Version 2022-11-02 as a cloud server. With the basic plan (A0 Instance), which has a storage of 20 GB, we can accommodate 400 users if one user is allotted 50 MB of data, which is adequate for the smallholder farmers operation for more than a year. The data can be download from the server and can be analyzed for future reference. Furthermore, the proposed system was implemented to regulate the internal microclimate for offseason grafting of citrus fruit Acid-Lime (sunkagati-1) inside a polyhouse. The grafting success of 84 percent was achieved, which is near to the regular on-season grafting rate. The real-life implementation of the platform is now deployed and hosted at www.medhayantra.com. The implementation and results showed that the proposed IoT architecture is reliable and effective in providing smallholder farmers with real-time data and control to improve the efficiency and productivity of their agricultural operations. However, there are also challenges to its implementation, such as the willingness of the smallholder farmers to adopt the technology, community training and support, and further reduction in cost and technical capacity for proper operation.

Author Contributions

R.R.L. conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing—original draft preparation. P.K. writing and/or presentation of the published work, specifically visualization/data presentation. P.O. writing, review and editing, supervision, project administration. A.A. review and editing, supervision, project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research has been partially funded by the University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the University of Malaga, located in Malaga, Spain, for their generous funding and support in conducting this research. The authors are also thankful to Umesh Acharya, Coordinator of National Citrus Research Program (NCRP), Dhankuta, National Agriculture Research Council (NARC) and Regional Agriculture Research Station (RARS) of Nepal for their support and providing the field for experiment. The authors also would like to thank Bharat Panthee of Medhayantra for his support in maintaining web domain and registration.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Stolojescu-Crisan, C.; Crisan, C.; Butunoi, B.-P. Access Control and Surveillance in a Smart Home. High-Confid. Comput. 2022, 2, 100036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Schomakers, E.M.; Biermann, H.; Ziefle, M. Users’ Preferences for Smart Home Automation—Investigating Aspects of Privacy and Trust. Telemat. Inform. 2021, 64, 101689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nižetić, S.; Šolić, P.; López-de-Ipiña González-de-Artaza, D.; Patrono, L. Internet of Things (IoT): Opportunities, Issues and Challenges towards a Smart and Sustainable Future. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 274, 122877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Fan, S.; Rue, C. The Role of Smallholder Farms in a Changing World. In The Role of Smallholder Farms in Food and Nutrition Security; Gomez y Paloma, S., Riesgo, L., Louhichi, K., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Germany, 2020; pp. 19–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Antony, A.P.; Leith, K.; Jolley, C.; Lu, J.; Sweeney, D.J. A Review of Practice and Implementation of the Internet of Things (IoT) for Smallholder Agriculture. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. GC, R.K.; Hall, R.P. The Commercialization of Smallholder Farming—A Case Study from the Rural Western Middle Hills of Nepal. Agriculture 2020, 10, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Antony, A.P.; Lu, J.; Sweeney, D.J. Seeds of Silicon: Internet of Things for Smallholder Agriculture. MIT D-Lab. 2019. Available online: https://d-lab.mit.edu/resources/publications/seeds-silicon-internet-things-smallholder-agriculture (accessed on 28 February 2023).
  8. Thapa, G.; Kumar, A.; Joshi, P. Agricultural Transformation in Nepal; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2019; ISBN 9813296488. [Google Scholar]
  9. Doshi, J.; Patel, T.; Bharti, S.K. Smart Farming Using IoT, a Solution for Optimally Monitoring Farming Conditions. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2019, 60, 746–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ayaz, M.; Ammad-Uddin, M.; Sharif, Z.; Mansour, A.; Aggoune, E.-H.M. Internet-of-Things (IoT)-Based Smart Agriculture: Toward Making the Fields Talk. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 129551–129583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nigussie, E.; Olwal, T.; Musumba, G.; Tegegne, T.; Lemma, A.; Mekuria, F. IoT-Based Irrigation Management for Smallholder Farmers in Rural Sub-Saharan Africa. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2020, 177, 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dahane, A.; Benameur, R.; Kechar, B. An IoT Low-Cost Smart Farming for Enhancing Irrigation Efficiency of Smallholders Farmers. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2022, 127, 3173–3210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bayih, A.Z.; Morales, J.; Assabie, Y.; de By, R.A. Utilization of Internet of Things and Wireless Sensor Networks for Sustainable Smallholder Agriculture. Sensors 2022, 22, 3273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Maraveas, C.; Bartzanas, T. Application of Internet of Things (IoT) for Optimized Greenhouse Environments. AgriEngineering 2021, 3, 954–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lufyagila, B.; Machuve, D.; Clemen, T. IoT-Powered System for Environmental Conditions Monitoring in Poultry House: A Case of Tanzania. Afr. J. Sci. Technol. Innov. Dev. 2022, 14, 1020–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Quayson, M.; Bai, C.; Sarkis, J. Technology for Social Good Foundations: A Perspective from the Smallholder Farmer in Sustainable Supply Chains. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2020, 68, 894–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cheng, W.M.; Liu, H.J.; Chen, R.; Chang, W.C.; Yuan, J.J.; Chen, J.; Jiang, J. A Real and Novel Smart Agriculture Implementation with IoT Technology. In Proceedings of the 2021 9th International Conference on Orange Technology (ICOT), Tainan, Taiwan, 16–17 December 2021; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Oliveira-Jr, A.; Resende, C.; Gonçalves, J.; Soares, F.; Moreira, W. IoT Sensing Platform for e-Agriculture in Africa. In Proceedings of the 2020 IST-Africa Conference (IST-Africa), Kampala, Uganda, 18–22 May 2020; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sekaran, K.; Meqdad, M.N.; Kumar, P.; Rajan, S.; Kadry, S. Smart Agriculture Management System Using Internet of Things. Telkomnika 2020, 18, 1275–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Haque, M.A.; Haque, S.; Sonal, D.; Kumar, K.; Shakeb, E. Security Enhancement for IoT Enabled Agriculture. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 49, 232–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Basudeb, B.; Das, V.A.; Kumar, A.; Pascal, L.; Khurram, K. Private blockchain-envisioned drones-assisted authentication scheme in IoT-enabled agricultural environment. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 2021, 80, 103567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jiang, H.; Li, X.; Safara, F. IoT-based Agriculture: Deep Learning in Detecting Apple Fruit Diseases. Microprocess. Microsyst. 2021, 104321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bu, F.; Wang, X. A Smart Agriculture IoT System Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 2019, 99, 500–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Parvathi Sangeetha, S.B.; Kumar, N.; Ambalgi, A.P. IOT Based Smart Irrigation Management System for Environmental Sustainability in India. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2022, 52, 101973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Katangle, S.; Kharade, M.; Deosarkar, S.B.; Kale, G.M.; Nalbalwar, S.L. Smart Home Automation-cum Agriculture System. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Industry 4.0 Technology (I4Tech), Pune, India, 13–15 February 2020; pp. 121–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. García-García, L.; Jiménez, J.M.; Abdullah, M.T.A.; Lloret, J. Wireless technologies for IoT in smart cities. Netw. Protoc. Algorithms 2018, 10, 23–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lamsal, R.R.; Bhattarai, M.; Acharya, U.; Otero, P. Monitoring and Regulating Climatic Condition of Polyhouse for Successful Off-season Grafting of Citrus Fruits Using Internet of Things Platform. Int. J. Agric. Environ. Biotechol. 2022, 15, 417–422. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mohapatra, B.N.; Jadhav, R.V.; Kharat, K.S. A Prototype of Smart Agriculture System Using Internet of Thing Based on Blynk Application Platform. J. Electron. Electromed. Eng. Med. Inform. 2022, 4, 24–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Seetha, J.; Nruthya, K.; Rao, N.K.K.; Rani, D.L. Enhancement of Agriculture Productivity and Automation of Agriculture using IoT. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Inventive Computation Technologies (ICICT), Lalitpur, Nepal, 26–28 April 2023; pp. 1411–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Customized IoT platform approach for smart agriculture.
Figure 1. Customized IoT platform approach for smart agriculture.
Agriculture 13 01900 g001
Figure 2. Onsite and online data log architecture.
Figure 2. Onsite and online data log architecture.
Agriculture 13 01900 g002
Figure 3. Client-side IoT devices.
Figure 3. Client-side IoT devices.
Agriculture 13 01900 g003
Figure 4. User registration and system application architecture.
Figure 4. User registration and system application architecture.
Agriculture 13 01900 g004
Figure 5. Web application and dashboard.
Figure 5. Web application and dashboard.
Agriculture 13 01900 g005
Figure 6. Mobile application dashboard.
Figure 6. Mobile application dashboard.
Agriculture 13 01900 g006
Figure 7. Time-series data visualization.
Figure 7. Time-series data visualization.
Agriculture 13 01900 g007
Figure 8. Implementation site: National Citrus Research Program, Dhankuta, Nepal. Figure depicts the experimental set-up for offseason grafting of Citrus fruits inside a polyhouse. The proposed IoT platform is used to regulate internal microclimate in real time.
Figure 8. Implementation site: National Citrus Research Program, Dhankuta, Nepal. Figure depicts the experimental set-up for offseason grafting of Citrus fruits inside a polyhouse. The proposed IoT platform is used to regulate internal microclimate in real time.
Agriculture 13 01900 g008
Figure 9. Server load test data for the different number of users.
Figure 9. Server load test data for the different number of users.
Agriculture 13 01900 g009
Figure 10. Blynk IoT platform comparison with different plan.
Figure 10. Blynk IoT platform comparison with different plan.
Agriculture 13 01900 g010
Figure 11. Thingspeak IoT platform comparison with different plan.
Figure 11. Thingspeak IoT platform comparison with different plan.
Agriculture 13 01900 g011
Figure 12. Performance comparison of the proposed system with a different plan.
Figure 12. Performance comparison of the proposed system with a different plan.
Agriculture 13 01900 g012
Figure 13. Number of users and cost of deployment.
Figure 13. Number of users and cost of deployment.
Agriculture 13 01900 g013
Table 1. Data export template in csv format.
Table 1. Data export template in csv format.
Device-IdTempHumidityExhaust FanFoggerUpdated On
GAG000003549.235116 November 2023 16:20
GAG000003547.137116 November 2023 16:35
GAG000003546.235116 November 2023 16:50
GAG000003544.437116 November 2023 17:05
GAG000003536.353006 November 2023 17:51
GAG000003534.758006 November 2023 18:06
GAG00000353461006 November 2023 18:21
GAG000003533.862006 November 2023 18:36
GAG000003533.363006 November 2023 18:51
GAG000003533.365006 November 2023 19:06
Table 2. Reliability and performance monitoring.
Table 2. Reliability and performance monitoring.
UserApplication ServiceUpdate IntervalObservation PeriodRemarks
1Temp, Humidity15 min120 daysSystem found to post data at regular interval reliably.
2Water Tank level
(Ultra sonic sensor based)
7 min120 daysSuccess (one or two false triggering due to improper isolation later rectified).
3i-SwitchControl WaterPump, Fogger, Garden Light, Exhaust FanEvery sec90 daysServer latency of 1 s observed sometimes (due to low bandwidth server).
4Temp/Humidity
Online/Offline Data logger
10 min120 daysData posted in the cloud and Logged in the microsd card at the given interval.
5Passive IR-Motion SensorEvery sec90 daysDetects and posts the data.
6Light intensity (Darkness Level) (0–1024)Every 15 min120 daysDetects and post the data as per the schedule.
Table 3. Off-season grafting success rate.
Table 3. Off-season grafting success rate.
Grafting DateRoot StockScionGrafting MethodGraftage NumberGraft Success NoGraft Unsuccessful NoGraft Success Rate (%)
1-JulyTrifoliateAcid Lime (Sunkagati-1)Veneer3027390
15-July3024680
30-July3025583.3
1-August3026486.6
15-August3023776.6
30-August3026486.6
Table 4. Server load test data for the different number of users.
Table 4. Server load test data for the different number of users.
Number of UsersNumber of SamplesResponse Time (ms)Throughput (Transactions/s)Network-
Received (kB/s)
Network—Sent (kB/s)
101482804.612.2919.752.78
3016841979.6414.2122.833.22
5019,9122614.7312.8820.682.92
10076536054.7711.1117.722.52
Table 5. Proposed IoT platform features and parameters.
Table 5. Proposed IoT platform features and parameters.
Proposed System Supporting 100 Users
FeaturesParameter
Level of complexityEasy
Web APP + Mobile AppIncludes both Web and mobile application
Data stream11 message/second
Data storage Cloud and also onsite field storage sd card
Image supportImage support for web application
Ease of maintenance and supportEasy and User centric
API integratedREST API
Security Unique Id + Cloud security
Alert featureEmail/SMS
ScalabilityArchitecture is designed for scalability
Data export (csv)1 year/Unlimited (on-site field storage)
PriceNPR 5270 (USD 39.9)
Table 6. Feature of Azure cloud platform and their instances *.
Table 6. Feature of Azure cloud platform and their instances *.
Our Hosting Cloud Platform
InstanceCoreRAM##(GB)Temp Storage (GB)Cost/Month
(USD)
A010.752014.6
A111.7522571.5
A223.5490143.2
A1v2121051.1
* The purposed IoT platform is currently hosted in A0 instance. For scalability It can be upgraded to A1, A2 instance. The feature and pricing is as on 16 April 2023.
Table 7. Cost analysis based on local market (in Nepali Rupees NPR *).
Table 7. Cost analysis based on local market (in Nepali Rupees NPR *).
Number of Shared User Custom IoT Device and Hardware Cost ** (One Time)Connectivity Cost/AnnumCloud Cost/AnnumApplication Development Cost/User (One Time)Support and Update/Annum
1035001000150020,00010,000
30330060080010,0004000
50300050060080003000
80300045050060002500
100300045050050002000
** Cost breakdown of custom IoT devices in NPR at local market: Esp8266 Nodemcu = 400, Power supply unit = 150, DHT 11 sensor = 200, Ultrasonic sensor = 200, PIR Motion Sensor = 150, 10 Amp relay module = 100, Wi-Fi router = 2000, connectors and accessories = 300. The slight reduction in cost for more users is to reflect on bulk purchase. * 132.165311 NPR = 1 USD (22 March 2023, 09:55 UTC)
Table 8. Comparative cost/annum with existing system.
Table 8. Comparative cost/annum with existing system.
Blynk
PlanPlus
Cost/Annum$159
Things Speak
PlanStandard
Cost/Annum$710
Proposed System
PlanStandard
Cost/Annum$39
Table 9. Number of transactions, messages, and file size.
Table 9. Number of transactions, messages, and file size.
S. No.Number of TransactionSensor ParametersNumber of MessagesFile Size (kB)No. of DaysInterval (Minute)Average Message /Day
16022212,0443701251596
27696430,78448315615197
314,640229,2808723861576
429,772389,316193622510397
542,959285,918256039010220
649,9673149,901321646510322
770,0656420,390480263015667
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lamsal, R.R.; Karthikeyan, P.; Otero, P.; Ariza, A. Design and Implementation of Internet of Things (IoT) Platform Targeted for Smallholder Farmers: From Nepal Perspective. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1900. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101900

AMA Style

Lamsal RR, Karthikeyan P, Otero P, Ariza A. Design and Implementation of Internet of Things (IoT) Platform Targeted for Smallholder Farmers: From Nepal Perspective. Agriculture. 2023; 13(10):1900. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101900

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lamsal, Ritu Raj, P. Karthikeyan, Pablo Otero, and Alfonso Ariza. 2023. "Design and Implementation of Internet of Things (IoT) Platform Targeted for Smallholder Farmers: From Nepal Perspective" Agriculture 13, no. 10: 1900. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101900

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop