Next Article in Journal
Geometric and Thermo-Gravimetric Evaluation of Bananas during Convective Drying: An Experimental Investigation
Next Article in Special Issue
Precision Agriculture: Strategies and Technology Adoption
Previous Article in Journal
Effectiveness of Grassland Protection and Pastoral Area Development under the Grassland Ecological Conservation Subsidy and Reward Policy
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Integrated Assessment of Different Types of Environment-Friendly Technological Progress and Their Spatial Spillover Effects in the Chinese Agriculture Sector
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Technology Acceptance, Adoption and Workforce on Australian Cotton Farms

1
Institute for Future Farming Systems, School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, CQUniversity, Rockhampton, QLD 4701, Australia
2
School of Education, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2022, 12(8), 1180; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12081180
Submission received: 30 May 2022 / Revised: 2 August 2022 / Accepted: 4 August 2022 / Published: 8 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Precision Agriculture Adoption Strategies)

Abstract

The future of work is influenced by the digital transformation of industries, including agriculture. The current study aimed to understand the social drivers of automated technology acceptance and adoption in Australian cotton farms. The study employed a mixed-methods approach to compare those who were (a) currently using automated technology, (b) not currently using automated technology but considering adoption, and (c) not currently using automated technology and no intention to adopt. The research found that social factors and workforce considerations influence growers’ motivation to adopt automated technology on farms. Furthermore, differences on appraisals of perceived usefulness were observed when comparing growers with no intention to adopt automated technology with those considering adoption or who have adopted automated technology. Both perceived usefulness and ease of use barriers are challenges for those considering adoption of automated technology. Support that improves ease of use for those who have adopted automated technology is important for continued appraisals of perceived usefulness of automated technology. Further research to understand antecedents to appraisals of perceived usefulness and ease of use, and how these interact to influence acceptance and automated technology, is required to inform strategic workforce interventions that support the digital transformation of cotton farms.
Keywords: agricultural technology; cotton; technology acceptance model; technology adoption agricultural technology; cotton; technology acceptance model; technology adoption

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

McDonald, N.; Fogarty, E.S.; Cosby, A.; McIlveen, P. Technology Acceptance, Adoption and Workforce on Australian Cotton Farms. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1180. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12081180

AMA Style

McDonald N, Fogarty ES, Cosby A, McIlveen P. Technology Acceptance, Adoption and Workforce on Australian Cotton Farms. Agriculture. 2022; 12(8):1180. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12081180

Chicago/Turabian Style

McDonald, Nicole, Eloise S. Fogarty, Amy Cosby, and Peter McIlveen. 2022. "Technology Acceptance, Adoption and Workforce on Australian Cotton Farms" Agriculture 12, no. 8: 1180. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12081180

APA Style

McDonald, N., Fogarty, E. S., Cosby, A., & McIlveen, P. (2022). Technology Acceptance, Adoption and Workforce on Australian Cotton Farms. Agriculture, 12(8), 1180. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12081180

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop