Parameter Optimization and Testing of a Self-Propelled Combine Cabbage Harvester

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The full text is clear in thinking and standardized in writing. The developed cabbage harvester has certain innovation and has certain guidance for actual production. As far as the content of text writing is concerned, there are still some details that need to be paid attention to.

1 line 171, formula (2) goes directly to formula (8), and the sequence number is wrong. It is recommended to pay attention to the details of the text, format specifications, etc.

2 line 172, the force analysis of cabbage on the pulling roller was not in place, no specific conclusions were drawn, and the selection of subsequent influencing factors did not play a theoretical support role. It is recommended to add detailed force analysis instructions.

3 line 290, whether the machine is only suitable for the planting mode of Figure 10, and whether the rest of the planting agronomy can be used, I think this can increase the wideness of the machine, please consider.

Author Response

请参阅附件。

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper carried out low damage optimization and experiment of self-propelled cabbage combine harvester, designed 4GCSD-1200 cabbage harvester, and completed field experiments. The overall structure of the dissertation is complete, the topic selection has a certain creativity, and has a high reference value for academic research.

As far as the writing content of this article is concerned, it is suggested to adjust the following contents:

1. Pay attention to the academic language expression of the whole article, and further improve the article format. Such as the accurate expression of the unit, the writing format needs to be further standardized.

2. Lines 171-186, after formula 2, go directly to formula 8, the serial number is wrong?

3. Line 172 lacks the specific analysis of Figure 3. Please supplement the specific force analysis of cabbage extraction, otherwise the theoretical analysis will be incomplete.

4. Line 175, do you consider which key parts of the additional device are composed?

5. Line 292, how to define the qualified rate of cabbage harvesting in the evaluation index? Why choose this index as the tool evaluation index? On what basis?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx