Next Article in Journal
The Influence of Residue Mixing on the Decomposition of Pepper Root Residues
Previous Article in Journal
Pre-COVID-19 Organic Market in the European Union—Focus on the Czech, German, and Slovak Markets
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Effect of Dietary Vitamin E on Growth Performance, Immunity and Antioxidant Capacity in Male Jiangnan White Goslings from 1 to 28 d of Age

Agriculture 2022, 12(1), 83; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12010083
by Qingyu Sun 1, Haiming Yang 1,*, Jun Yu 1, Jingru Liang 1, Xuean Xu 1 and Zhiyue Wang 1,2
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Agriculture 2022, 12(1), 83; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12010083
Submission received: 10 December 2021 / Revised: 31 December 2021 / Accepted: 5 January 2022 / Published: 10 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Farm Animal Production)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript entitled "Effect of dietary vitamin E on growth performance, immunity and antioxidant capacity in male Jiangnan white goslings from 1 to 28 d of age" investigated the effect of different levels of vitamin E on performance, antioxidant status and humoral immune response of Jiangnan white goslings. The results revealed the improvement potential of vitamin E to the studied parameters. The manuscript is well prepared except the results section. The English is not sufficient and needs to be improved. I have some remarks on the manuscript:

  • My major concern is the statistical analysis. I contraindicate the use of LSD post-hoc test. This test does not control the occurrence of type I error, which makes the results found doubtful. I suggest that authors use Tukey's test.
  • Line 59, the authors must be more precise in formulating their sentences and do more in-depth research. You are not the first to study the effect of vitamin E supplementation on geese. Please review, for example, but not limited to, the following articles:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7353491/

https://www.igbzpan.pl/uploaded/FSiBundleContentBlockBundleEntityTranslatableBlockTranslatableFilesElement/filePath/30/str181-194.pdf

  • Line 101, add more information about the centrifuge such as model, city, country … etc.
  • Presentation of results section is poor and needs to be improved.
  • Lines 124-125, no significant differences among groups in which parameter? Rewrite the sentence.
  • Remove Table 7 and merge it with Table 3, or at least keep the table numbering order within the manuscript.
  • Line 146, not correct, no significant differences between 36 mg/kg group and 0, 12 and 24 mg/kg groups. You may mean 48 mg/kg group!
  • Line 180, again not correct, the 48 mg/kg group was less than that of only the 0 mg/kg but not 12 mg/kg. You may mean 36 mg/kg group!
  • Line 190, focus on geese and poultry rather than the human body.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The work is on a beautiful and interesting subject. It provides income to science and the sector.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I have no further comments.

Back to TopTop