Depth and Sowing Rate as Factors Affecting the Development, Plant Density, Height and Yielding for Two Faba Bean (Vicia faba L. Var. Minor) Cultivars
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experiment Design and Conditions (Weather, Soil) of Experiment
2.2. Measurements
2.3. Statistical Analyses
3. Results
3.1. Effect of Weather Conditions in Years of Research on the Plant Development of Faba Bean
3.2. Effect of Examined Factors on Plant Density, Height of Plants before Harvest and Seed and Straw Yield
4. Discussion
4.1. The Effect of Weather Conditions on the Plant Development of Faba Bean
4.2. Effect of Examined Factors on Plant Density, Height of Plants before Harvest and Seed and Straw Yield
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Wakweya, K.; Dargie, R.; Meleta, T. Effect of Sowing Date and Seed Rate on Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) Growth, Yield and Components of Yield at Sinana, Highland Conditions of Bale, Southeastern Ethiopia. Int. J. Sci. Res. Agric. Sci. 2016, 3, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mandal, U.K.; Singh, G.; Victor, U.S.; Sharma, K.L. Green manuring: Its effect on soil properties and crop growth under rice—Wheat cropping system. Eur. J. Agron. 2003, 19, 225–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crépon, K.; Marget, P.; Peyronnet, C.; Carrouée, B.; Arese, P.; Duc, G. Nutritional value of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) seeds for feed and food. Field Crop. Res. 2010, 115, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vioque, J.; Alaiz, M.; Girón-Calle, J. Nutritional and functional properties of Vicia faba protein isolates and related fractions. Food Chem. 2012, 132, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Landry, E.J.; Coyne, C.J.; Hu, J. Agronomic performance of spring-sown faba bean in Southeastern Washington. Agron. J. 2015, 107, 574–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jensen, E.S.; Peoples, M.B.; Hauggaard-Nielsen, H. Faba bean in cropping systems. Field Crop. Res. 2010, 115, 203–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Galloway, J.N.; Dentener, F.J.; Capone, D.G.; Boyer, E.W.; Howarth, R.W.; Seitzinger, S.P.; Asner, G.P.; Cleveland, C.C.; Green, P.A.; Holland, E.A.; et al. Nitrogen Cycles: Past, Present, and Future. Biogeochemistry 2004, 70, 153–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neugschwandtner, R.; Ziegler, K.; Kriegner, S.; Wagentristl, H.; Kaul, H.P. Nitrogen yield and nitrogen fixation of winter faba beans. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B Soil Plant Sci. 2015, 65, 658–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salahin, N.; Alam, K.; Islam, M.; Naher, L.; Majid, N.M. Effects of green manure crops and tillage practice on maize and rice yields and soil properties. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2013, 7, 1901–1911. [Google Scholar]
- Prusiński, J.; Kaszkowiak, E.; Borowska, M. Effect of nitrogen fertilization and foliar application on faba bean seed yield and yield components. Fragm. Agron. 2008, 25, 111–127. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Śmiglak-Krajewska, M. Cultivation of Legume Crops in the Context of Sustainable Agriculture. Ann. Pol. Assoc. Agric. Agribus. Econ. 2018, 20, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Albayrak, S.; Türk, M.; Yüksel, O. Effect of row spacing and seeding rate on hungarian vetch yield and quality. Turk. J. Field Crop. 2011, 16, 54–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gezahegn, A.M.; Tesfaye, K.; Sharma, J.J.; Belel, M.D. Determination of optimum plant density for faba bean (Vicia faba L.) on vertisols at Haramaya, Eastern Ethiopia. Cogent Food Agric. 2016, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- López-Bellido, F.J.; López-Bellido, L.; López-Bellido, R.J. Competition, growth and yield of faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Eur. J. Agron. 2005, 23, 359–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jettner, R.; Loss, S.P.; Martin, L.D.; Siddique, K.H.M. Responses of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) to sowing rate in south-western Australia II Canopy development, radiation absorption and dry matter partitioning. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1998, 49, 999–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mwanamwenge, J.; Loss, S.P.; Siddique, K.H.M.; Cocks, P.S. Growth, seed yield and water use of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) in a short-season Mediterranean-type environment. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 1998, 38, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baye, E.; Ebirahim, Z.; Kasahun, N.; Wasyihun, N.; Siyum, K.; Yachiso, D.; Tiruneh, Z.; Fekadu, B. Effects of Planting Depth on Germination and Growth of Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) at Fitche, Oromia National Regional State, Central Ethiopia. Am. J. Agric. For. 2020, 8, 53863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siddique, K.H.M.; Loss, S.P. Studies on sowing depth for chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), faba bean (Vicia faba L.) and Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik) in a Mediterranean-type environment of south-western Australia. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 1999, 182, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, S.A.M.; Idris, A.Y. Effect of Seed Size and Sowing Depth on Germination and Some Growth Parameters of Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.). Agric. Biol. Sci. J. 2015, 1, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Gan, Y.T.; Miller, P.R.; McDonald, C.L. Response of kabuli chickpea to seed size and planting depth. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2003, 83, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IUSS Working Group WRB. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, Update 2015 International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps. In World Soil Resources Reports; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2014; Volume 106, p. 192. [Google Scholar]
- IUNG-PIB. Available online: http://www.iung.pulawy.pl/ (accessed on 13 September 2020).
- Meier, U. Growth Stages of Mono-and Dicotyledonous Plants; JKI: Quedlinburg, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kulig, B.; Kołodziej, J.; Oleksy, A.; Kołodziejczyk, M.; Sajdak, A. Influence of weather conditions on faba bean yielding. Ecol. Eng. 2011, 18, 1071–1078. [Google Scholar]
- Pszczółkowska, A.; Okorski, A.; Fordonski, G.; Kotecki, A.; Kozak, M.; Dzienis, G. Effect of weather conditions on yield and health status of faba bean seeds in Poland. Agronomy 2020, 10, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Barłóg, P.; Grzebisz, W.; Łukowiak, R. Faba bean yield and growth dynamics in response to soil potassium availability and sulfur application. Field Crop. Res. 2018, 219, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Podleśny, J. Effect of amount and distribution of precipitation during vegetation on growth, development and yielding of determinate and traditional faba bean varieties. Acta Agroph. 2009, 14, 413–425. [Google Scholar]
- Singh, A.K.; Bhatt, B.P.; Sundaram, P.K.; Gupta, A.K.; Singh, D. Planting geometry to optimize growth and productivity in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) and soil fertility. J. Environ. Biol. 2013, 34, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Aikins, S.H.M.; Afuakwa, J.J.; Baidoo, D. Effect of planting depth on maize stand establishment. Ghana Inst. Eng. 2006, 4, 20–25. [Google Scholar]
- Nabi, G.; Mullins, C.E.; Montemayor, M.B.; Akhtar, M.S. Germination and Emergence of irrigated Cotton in Pakistan in relation to Sowing Depth and Physical proprieties of the Seedbed. Soil Tillage Res. 2001, 59, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Suhaibani, N.; El-Hendawy, S.; Schmidhalter, U. Influence of varied plant density on growth, yield and economic return of drip irrigated faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Turk. J. Field Crop. 2013, 18, 185–197. [Google Scholar]
- Gasim, S.; Hamad, S.A.A.; Abdelmula, A.; Mohamed Ahmed, I.A. Yield and quality attributes of faba bean inbred lines grown under marginal environmental conditions of Sudan. Food Sci. Nutr. 2015, 3, 539–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aguilera-Diaz, C.; Recalde-Manrique, R. Effects of plant density and inorganic nitrogen fertilizer on field beans (Vicia faba). J. Agric. Sci. 1995, 125, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dahmardeh, M.; Ramroodi, M.; Valizadeh, J. Effect of plant density and cultivars on growth, yield and yield components of faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 9, 5. [Google Scholar]
- El-Sadek, A.; Salem, E. Impact of ridge–Furrow water harvesting system on faba bean (Vicia faba L.) production under rainfed conditions in Matrouh, Egypt. Ann. Agric. Sci. 2015, 60, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mellendorf, E.N. Soybean Growth and Yield Response to Interplant Competition Relief in Various Plant Density Environments. Master’s Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA, 2011; p. 85. [Google Scholar]
- Bond, D.A.; Lawes, D.A.; Hawtin, G.C.; Saxena, M.C.; Stephens, J.H. Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.). In Grain Legume Crops; Smmerfield, R.J., Roberts, E.H., Eds.; Collins: London, UK, 1985; pp. 199–265. [Google Scholar]
Years | pH in 1 M KCl | P | K | Mg |
---|---|---|---|---|
2011 | 5.8 | 74 | 179 | 72 |
2012 | 6.2 | 73 | 133 | 96 |
2013 | 5.9 | 62 | 116 | 87 |
Average (2011–2013) | 6.0 | 70 | 143 | 85 |
Specification | Cultivars | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bobas | Granit | |||||
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | |
Germination capacity (%) | 95 | 98 | 94 | 80 | 94 | 80 |
Purity (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Mass of 1000 seeds (g) | 500 | 667 | 612 | 466 | 510 | 554 |
Specification | Years | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | ||
Sowing Date | 31/03 | 26/03 | 16/04 | |
Plant Protection Products | Active Substances | |||
Linurex 500 SC-1.5 dm3 ha−1 | Linuron | 02/04 | 26/03 | 17/04 |
Basagran 480 SL-2 dm3 ha−1 | Bentazone | 02/05 | 07/05 | 10/05 |
Alert 375-1.3 dm3 ha−1 | Flusilazole and carbendazim | 19/05 | 18/06 | - |
Karate Zeon 050 SC-0.1 dm3 ha−1 | Lambda-cyhalothrin | - | 29/05 | - |
Bi 58 Nowy 400 EC-0.5 dm3 ha−1 | Dimethoate | - | 22/05 | 22/05 |
Mospilan 20 SP-1 dm3 ha−1 | Acetamipride | - | 31/05 | - |
Fastac 0.1 dm3 ha−1 | Alpha-cypermethrin | 22/06 | 18/06 | - |
Harvesting date | 11/08 | 16/08 | 14/08 |
Specification | Development Stages | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vegetative (V) | Average for Years | Generative (G) | Average for Years | Vegetation Period (V + G) | Average for Years | ||||
Bobas | Granit | Bobas | Granit | Bobas | Granit | ||||
2011 | |||||||||
Length of stages [days] | 46.0 | 46.0 | 46.0 ± 0.0 | 86 | 81 | 83.5 ± 3.5 | 132 | 127 | 130 ± 3.5 |
Average temperature [°C] | 12.0 | 12.0 | 12.0 | 18.7 | 18.6 | 18.7 | 16.4 | 16.2 | 16.4 |
Total sum of precipitation [mm] | 61.5 | 61.5 | 61.05 | 296.0 | 284.8 | 290.4 | 357.5 | 346.3 | 351.9 |
2012 | |||||||||
Length of stages [days] | 45 | 45 | 45 ± 0.0 | 96 | 91 | 93.5 ± 3.5 | 141 | 136 | 138.5 ± 3.5 |
Average temperature [°C] | 10.7 | 10.7 | 10.7 | 18.1 | 18.2 | 18.2 | 15.7 | 15.8 | 15.8 |
Total sum of precipitation [mm] | 111.8 | 111.8 | 111.8 | 202.6 | 239.3 | 220.9 | 314.4 | 351.1 | 332.75 |
2013 | |||||||||
Length of stages [days] | 39 | 39 | 39 ± 0.0 | 77 | 75 | 76 ± 1.4 | 116 | 114 | 115 ± 1.4 |
Average temperature [°C] | 14.6 | 14.6 | 14.6 | 19.1 | 18.6 | 18.6 | 17.6 | 17.2 | 17.4 |
Total sum of precipitation [mm] | 116.4 | 116.4 | 116.4 | 302.5 | 280.9 | 291.7 | 418.9 | 397.3 | 408.1 |
Average for the years 2011–2013 | |||||||||
Length of stages [days] (average for cultivars) | 43 ± 3.8 | 43 ± 3.8 | 43 ± 0.0 | 86 ± 9.5 | 82 ± 8.1 | 84 ± 13.3 | 130 ± 12.7 | 126 ± 11.1 | 128.0 ± 11.9 |
Average temperature [°C] | 12.3 | 12.3 | 12.3 | 18.6 | 18.5 | 18.6 | 16.5 | 16.4 | 16.5 |
Total sum of precipitation [mm] | 96.6 | 96.6 | 96.6 | 267.0 | 268.3 | 267.6 | 363.6 | 364.9 | 364.3 |
Specification | Plant Density before Harvest [pc m−2] | Height of Plants [cm] | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
p-Value | ||||||
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | |
For factors | ||||||
Sowing depth (SDH) | 0.0008 | 0.1645 | 0.0198 | 0.0034 | 0.4845 | 0.0007 |
Cultivar (C) | 0.0071 | 0.0114 | 0.9628 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
Sowing density (SDY) | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.2818 | 0.8549 | 0.0193 |
For interactions | ||||||
SDH × C | 0.4175 | 0.9257 | 0.8889 | 0.4816 | 0.0726 | 0.2453 |
SDH × SDY | 0.0013 | 0.7486 | 0.8163 | 0.0004 | 0.5208 | 0.9371 |
C × SDY | 0.0002 | 0.6047 | 0.9254 | 0.0000 | 0.8127 | 0.6391 |
Specification | Yield [t ha−1] | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Seed | Straw | |||||
p-Value | ||||||
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | |
For factors | ||||||
Sowing depth (SDH) | 0.0020 | 0.1885 | 0.0010 | 0.2841 | 0.1387 | 0.0184 |
Cultivar (C) | 0.0000 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0857 | 0.0001 | 0.1140 |
Sowing density (SDY) | 0.0000 | 0.0189 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0594 | 0.0000 |
For interactions | ||||||
SDH × C | 0.0133 | 0.5922 | 0.0255 | 0.3563 | 0.2893 | 0.0285 |
SDH × SDY | 0.0580 | 0.6407 | 0.0000 | 0.0547 | 0.3123 | 0.0133 |
C × SDY | 0.0114 | 0.8561 | 0.0005 | 0.0050 | 0.9779 | 0.8071 |
Specification | Plant Density before Harvest [pc m−2] | Plant Height [cm] | Seed Yield [t ha−1] | Straw Yield [t ha−1] | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011 | |||||
Sowing depth (SDH) | 5 | 48.7a | 62.5b | 4.50a | 3.26a |
8 | 44.8b | 65.5a | 4.26b | 3.18a | |
Cultivars (C) | Bobas | 47.7a | 67.5a | 4.75a | 3.51a |
Granit | 45.8a | 60.5b | 4.01b | 2.93b | |
Sowing density (SDY) | 45 | 37.5c | 64.5a | 4.18a | 3.00a |
60 | 48.3b | 63.9a | 4.42a | 3.23ab | |
75 | 54.5a | 63.6a | 4.55a | 3.38b | |
2012 | |||||
Sowing depth (SDH) | 5 | 49.6a | 69.8a | 6.62a | 4.22a |
8 | 51.1a | 68.5a | 6.25b | 3.89a | |
Cultivars (C) | Bobas | 51.8a | 88.0a | 7.27a | 4.88a |
Granit | 48.8a | 50.3b | 5.60b | 3.23b | |
Sowing density (SDY) | 45 | 38.8c | 68.5a | 6.20a | 3.91a |
60 | 50.2b | 69.7a | 6.39a | 3.81a | |
75 | 61.9a | 69.4a | 6.72a | 4.44a | |
2013 | |||||
Sowing depth (SDH) | 5 | 48.4b | 81.3b | 3.32b | 1.89b |
8 | 53.4a | 90.5a | 3.53a | 2.42a | |
Cultivars (C) | Bobas | 51.0a | 90.3a | 3.61a | 2.12a |
Granit | 50.9a | 81.5b | 3.24b | 2.19a | |
Sowing density (SDY) | 45 | 39.6c | 83.7a | 3.24a | 1.92a |
60 | 51.5b | 85.7a | 3.50b | 2.17ab | |
75 | 61.8a | 88.4a | 3.54b | 2.38b |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Helios, W.; Jama-Rodzeńska, A.; Serafin-Andrzejewska, M.; Kotecki, A.; Kozak, M.; Zarzycki, P.; Kuchar, L. Depth and Sowing Rate as Factors Affecting the Development, Plant Density, Height and Yielding for Two Faba Bean (Vicia faba L. Var. Minor) Cultivars. Agriculture 2021, 11, 820. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11090820
Helios W, Jama-Rodzeńska A, Serafin-Andrzejewska M, Kotecki A, Kozak M, Zarzycki P, Kuchar L. Depth and Sowing Rate as Factors Affecting the Development, Plant Density, Height and Yielding for Two Faba Bean (Vicia faba L. Var. Minor) Cultivars. Agriculture. 2021; 11(9):820. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11090820
Chicago/Turabian StyleHelios, Waldemar, Anna Jama-Rodzeńska, Magdalena Serafin-Andrzejewska, Andrzej Kotecki, Marcin Kozak, Piotr Zarzycki, and Leszek Kuchar. 2021. "Depth and Sowing Rate as Factors Affecting the Development, Plant Density, Height and Yielding for Two Faba Bean (Vicia faba L. Var. Minor) Cultivars" Agriculture 11, no. 9: 820. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11090820
APA StyleHelios, W., Jama-Rodzeńska, A., Serafin-Andrzejewska, M., Kotecki, A., Kozak, M., Zarzycki, P., & Kuchar, L. (2021). Depth and Sowing Rate as Factors Affecting the Development, Plant Density, Height and Yielding for Two Faba Bean (Vicia faba L. Var. Minor) Cultivars. Agriculture, 11(9), 820. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11090820