Next Article in Journal
Influences of Soil Bulk Density and Texture on Estimation of Surface Soil Moisture Using Spectral Feature Parameters and an Artificial Neural Network Algorithm
Previous Article in Journal
Osmolyte Accumulation and Sodium Compartmentation Has a Key Role in Salinity Tolerance of Pistachios Rootstocks
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agriculture
Volume 11
Issue 8
10.3390/agriculture11080709
agriculture-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
Erratum to Agriculture 2021, 11(6), 571.
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Erratum

Erratum: Tröster, M.F.; Sauer, J. IoFarm in Field Test: Does a Cost-Optimal Choice of Fertilization Influence Yield, Protein Content, and Market Performance in Crop Production? Agriculture 2021, 11, 571

by
Agriculture Editorial Office
MDPI AG, St. Alban-Anlage 66, 4052 Basel, Switzerland
Agriculture 2021, 11(8), 709; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11080709
Submission received: 12 July 2021 / Accepted: 16 July 2021 / Published: 28 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Crop Production)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes
The Agriculture Editorial Office would like to make the following correction to the published paper [1].
In the original article, there was a mistake in Figure 3 as published. In the original article, an incorrect version of the Figure 3 has been used. The corrected Figure 3 appears below:
We apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The original article has been updated.

Reference

  1. Tröster, M.F.; Sauer, J. IoFarm in field test: Does a cost-optimal choice of fertilization influence yield, protein content, and market performance in crop production? Agriculture 2021, 11, 571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Agriculture 11 00709 g003 550
Figure 3. Similarities and differences in fertilizer strategy: Farm Manager and IoFarm.
Figure 3. Similarities and differences in fertilizer strategy: Farm Manager and IoFarm.
Agriculture 11 00709 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Agriculture Editorial Office. Erratum: Tröster, M.F.; Sauer, J. IoFarm in Field Test: Does a Cost-Optimal Choice of Fertilization Influence Yield, Protein Content, and Market Performance in Crop Production? Agriculture 2021, 11, 571. Agriculture 2021, 11, 709. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11080709

AMA Style

Agriculture Editorial Office. Erratum: Tröster, M.F.; Sauer, J. IoFarm in Field Test: Does a Cost-Optimal Choice of Fertilization Influence Yield, Protein Content, and Market Performance in Crop Production? Agriculture 2021, 11, 571. Agriculture. 2021; 11(8):709. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11080709

Chicago/Turabian Style

Agriculture Editorial Office. 2021. "Erratum: Tröster, M.F.; Sauer, J. IoFarm in Field Test: Does a Cost-Optimal Choice of Fertilization Influence Yield, Protein Content, and Market Performance in Crop Production? Agriculture 2021, 11, 571" Agriculture 11, no. 8: 709. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11080709

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop