Next Article in Journal
The Genetics of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: An Overview of Candidate Gene Systematic Reviews and Genome-Wide Association Studies
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Gut Microbiota and Their Metabolic Potential in Patients with Schizophrenia Treated with Olanzapine: Results from a Six-Week Observational Prospective Cohort Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 8
Issue 10
10.3390/jcm8101604
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nasopharyngeal Lymphoma: A 22-Year Review of 35 Cases

by
Chien-Yu Hsueh
1,2,
Ching-Fen Yang
2,3,
Jyh-Pyng Gau
2,4,
Edward C. Kuan
5,
Ching-Yin Ho
2,6,
Tzeon-Jye Chiou
2,7,
Liang-Tsai Hsiao
2,4,
Ting-An Lin
2,4 and
Ming-Ying Lan
1,2,*
1
Department of Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
2
School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
3
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
4
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
5
Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, USA
6
Department of Otolaryngology, Cheng Hsin Hospital, Taipei 11220, Taiwan
7
Division of Transfusion Medicine, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8(10), 1604; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8101604
Submission received: 1 September 2019 / Revised: 29 September 2019 / Accepted: 30 September 2019 / Published: 3 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Otolaryngology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Nasopharyngeal (NP) lymphoma is a rare primary malignancy of the head and neck and represents a minority of malignancies originating from the nasopharynx. For this reason, there are limited data regarding epidemiologic and treatment outcomes. This is a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with NP lymphoma from 1995 to 2017 at a tertiary medical center. The patients’ demographic data, clinical presentations, treatment modalities, Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-encoded small RNA (EBER) staining, and outcomes were investigated. We considered a total of 35 patients, including 20 males and 15 females, diagnosed with NP lymphoma. The age ranged from 17 to 88 years (mean = 59.6). The common presentations were nasal obstruction, epistaxis, and neck mass. In our study, the most common pathological diagnosis of NP lymphoma was diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (n = 17), followed by NK/T cell lymphoma (NKTCL) (n = 9). Other pathologic diagnoses included extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALToma), small lymphocytic lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma. There were 13 cases showing EBER positivity, including 7 cases of NKTCL, 5 cases of DLBCL, and 1 case of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). Most patients received chemotherapy alone, while some patients received both chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Seven patients had local recurrence, and fewer than half of the patients (n = 16) were alive at the time of the study (mean follow-up duration: 54.4 months). The five-year overall survival was 50.4%. NP lymphoma is very rare, and the most common pathologic type is DLBCL. EBER positivity is found in both NKTCL and DLBCL. Identifying more effective therapeutic agents is extremely important to improve patients’ survival.

1. Introduction

Lymphoma, the most common non-epithelial malignancy of the head and neck region, can be classified into two types, Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) [1]. Among them, primary nasopharyngeal (NP) lymphoma is a very rare tumor, with only limited studies found in the literatures [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Waldeyer-Hartz firstly described the lymphoid tissues within the nasopharynx, oropharyngeal wall, base of the tongue, palatine tonsils, and soft palate, known today as Waldeyer’s ring (WR) [7]. It has been reported that less than 10% of NHL cases in Western countries involved the WR (WR-NHL) [11,12,13], while 10–18% of NHL cases were WR-NHL in Asian countries [7]. Among WR-NHL, about 35–37% of cases were at the nasopharyngeal site, and there was no difference of incidence between Western and Asian countries [7,9].
NP lymphoma is a rare extranodal lymphoma with a variety of histopathologic subtypes, and the incidences of different subtypes are quite different among different areas [7,9]. Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and NK/T cell lymphoma (NKTCL) are the two most common pathologic diagnoses [7,9]. Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) has been known to be related to lymphoma pathogenesis. However, related studies in NP lymphoma are very few. EBV-associated viral proteins were found to play important roles in the genesis of lymphomas through several mechanisms [10,14,15,16,17]. The expression of EBV-encoded small RNAs (EBER) is common in NKTCL, while EBER positivity is still controversial in DLBCL [10,18,19,20,21,22]. There are studies reporting that EBER-positive patients have a poorer prognosis than EBER-negative patients [10,23].
So far, there are relatively few data regarding NP lymphomas, especially in areas with high incidence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The aim of this study was to analyze the clinicopathologic characteristics and survival of NP lymphoma patients at a tertiary medical center in Taiwan. Subgroup analyses was also conducted to further identify the association between EBER positivity and the clinical features of NP lymphomas. This is one of the only two studies investigating EBER expression in NP lymphoma [4].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patient Population

We retrospectively reviewed the records and data of patients who had undergone NP biopsy demonstrating pathology-proven lymphoma at Taipei Veterans General Hospital in Taipei, Taiwan, between 1 January, 1995 and 31 October, 2017. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Taipei Veterans General Hospital approved this study. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
The diagnostic criteria for lymphoma were based on the World Health Organization classification [1] using both morphologic and immunohistochemical evaluations. All patients were staged according to the Ann Arbor staging system [24]. Data including sex, age, tumor stage (according to Ann Arbor classification), underlying medical comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, or coronary artery disease), initial clinical presentation, duration of symptoms, pathology, treatment modalities and outcomes, and survival time, were reviewed. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and EBERs in situ hybridization (ISH) examinations were used for pathologic diagnoses. The diagnoses of all cases were reviewed and confirmed.

2.2. ISH of EBERs

ISH studies were performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. Tissue sections were deparaffinized according to established procedures. Antigen retrieval was performed using the Enzyme Pretreatment Kit (AR9551, Leica Biosystems Newcastle Ltd, UK) for 5 min at 37 °C. We used the Bond™ Ready-to-Use ISH EBER Probe (PB0589, Leica Biosystems Newcastle Ltd, UK) as the primary antibody for 90 minutes. Slides were then stained using Bond™ Polymer Refine Detection (DS9800, Leica Biosystems Newcastle Ltd, UK) with the Leica Biosystems BONDMAX autostainer (Leica Biosystems Newcastle Ltd, UK), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, an anti-fluorescein antibody was used for 15 minutes, followed by the post-primary IgG linker reagent which localized the mouse antibody for 4 minutes, and the poly-HRP IgG reagent which localized the rabbit antibody for 4 minutes. Staining was then developed with the substrate chromogen DAB (3,3’-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride) for 10 minutes. Finally, the sections were counterstained with modified Mayer’s hematoxylin for 10 minutes.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Quantitative data were summarized as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and categorical variables as percentages. IBM SPSS 20.0 software (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analyses. Categorical data were compared using the chi-square test. The Kaplan–Meier method was used for estimating overall survival (OS), defined as the time in months from diagnosis to death or last follow-up due to any cause. Differences in survival were compared using the log-rank test. All tests were two-tailed and conducted considering a 5% significance level.

3. Results

3.1. Patients

We considered a total of 35 patients, including 20 males and 15 females, diagnosed with NP lymphoma at Taipei Veterans General Hospital between 1995 and 2017. The age at diagnosis ranged from 17 to 88 years (mean 59.6). Ten patients had hypertension, six had diabetes, and four had coronary artery disease. The most common presenting signs and symptoms included nasal obstruction (28.9%, n = 10), epistaxis (25.7%, n = 9), neck mass (22.9%, n = 8), purulent rhinorrhea (17.1%, n = 6), headache (14.3%, n = 5), and B symptoms (14.3%, n = 5) (Table 1). The average time window between initial symptoms to diagnosis ranged from 0.5 to 12 months (mean 2.6 months). The average white blood cell count (WBC) was 12,992 cells/cm3 (2400–167,800), and the average lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) level was 337.7 U/L (106–1702).
In our study, the most common pathological diagnosis of nasopharyngeal lymphoma was DLBCL (48.6%, n = 17), followed by NKTCL (25.7%, n = 9). Other pathologic diagnoses included extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALToma) (8.6%, n = 3), small lymphocytic lymphoma (5.7%, n = 2), mantle cell lymphoma (5.7%, n = 2), B lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (2.9%, n = 1), and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) (2.9%, n = 1) (Figure 1).
As for tumor location, most of the tumors (62.9%, n = 22) were located in the nasopharynx only (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Some of the tumors (n = 3) extended to adjacent sites, including the paranasal sinuses, nasal cavity, oral cavity, and oropharynx. Ten cases (28.6%) had neck lymph nodes involvement or other distant involvements when diagnosed. On the basis of the Ann Arbor staging system, 12 patients (34.3%) had stage I, 15 patients (42.9%) had stage II, and 8 patients (22.9%) had stage IV lymphoma. The characteristics of stage IV cases are listed in Supplementary Table S1. There were no cases with central nervous system (CNS) involvement in our series.

3.2. EBERs

Regarding EBER staining, 13 cases were EBER-positive, including 7 cases of NKTCL, 5 cases of DLBCL, and 1 case of PTLD (Table 1) (Figure 4 and Figure 5). There were three cases for which EBER staining was not possible because of insufficient specimen, including one case of DLBCL and two cases of NKTCL.

3.3. Treatment Modality

Most of the patients (94.3%, n = 33) received chemotherapy (CT). Only one patient received radiotherapy (RT) alone; 22.9% of patients (n = 8) received both CT and RT. Some patients (22.9%, n = 8) also received peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) after primary treatment.

3.4. Survival

Although there was no significant difference of OS between patients receiving CT alone or combined chemoradiotherapy, a higher 10-year OS was observed in patients receiving combined therapy (41.7% vs. 31.2%). Fewer than half of the patients (n = 16) were alive at the last follow-up. Two-year, 5-year, and 10-year OS were 67.9%, 50.4%, and 33.6%, respectively. OS was not correlated with sex (p = 0.816), B symptoms (p = 0.305), age (p = 0.414), and Ann Arbor stage (p = 0.959).

3.5. Recurrence

There were eight patients (22.9%) who experienced recurrence, including five patients (62.5%) with neck recurrence, two patients with distant recurrence (lung and thigh), and one patient with local (NP) recurrence.

3.6. Subgroup Analysis

A comparison of the main clinical characteristics of NP DLBCL (NP-DLBCL) and NKTCL (NP-NKTCL) patients is shown in Table 2. The ratio of males to females was 1.125:1 in NP-DLBCL and 2:1 in NP-NKTCL. Patients with NP-DLBCL tended to present with regional lymph node involvement and stage IV disease. Among several clinical characteristics, only duration of symptoms and EBER expression had significant differences between the two groups. The mean duration of symptoms in NP-DLBCL patients was 1.53 months, while the mean duration of symptoms in NP-NKTCL patients was 4.33 months (p = 0.009). For cases with EBER ISH data (n = 32), all NP-NKTCL revealed EBER positivity (n = 7), while 5 out of 16 cases of NP-DLBCL showed EBER positivity. More cases of NP-DLBCL received CT only (75% vs. 55.6%), while more cases of NP-NKTCL received combined CT and RT (44.4% vs. 25%). The mean OS rate of NP-DLBCL patients was 84.4%, which was higher than the mean OS rate of NP-NKTCL patients (57.2%), but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.413) (Table 2) (Figure 6).

4. Discussion

NP lymphoma is a rare extranodal hematologic malignancy with a variety of underlying histopathologic subtypes. Although the incidence of the subtypes of NP lymphoma has been reported to be different in different areas of the world [2,3,4,5,6,7,9,10], NP lymphoma is broadly classified into two types, HL and NHL. NHL accounts for the majority of lymphomas, about 86% of lymphoma cases in the Western population and 90% of lymphoma cases in the Asian population [25,26,27]. Among NHL, B cell lymphoma is the most common lymphoma in western countries, making up more than 90% of NHL cases [26,28], but is less common in Asian countries (64.3%) [27]. B cell lymphoma is also naturally more common among NP lymphomas, with 52.5% of cases in the Asian population and 77.5% of cases in the Western population, respectively [7,9]. In contrast, NKTCL accounts for 47.5% of NP lymphomas in the Asian population, while it accounts for only 6% of NP lymphoma in the Western population [7,9].
The WR is an uncommon site for NHL, with only 10–18% of NHL in Asia occurring in WR in Asia [5,29,30]. In Wu et al.’s study, NP presented as the primary site of tumor location in 26% of WR-DLBCL and in 66% of WR-NKTCL. Regarding NP lymphoma, the most common histological type was reported to be B-cell lymphoma (48.6–87.6% of NP lymphoma) [2,6,9,31]. In our study, the most common NP lymphoma was also DLBCL (48.6%), followed by NKTCL (25.7%), and poorer prognosis was noted for NKTCL compared to DLBCL. Other rare subtypes of NP lymphoma included MALToma (8.6%), small lymphocytic lymphoma (5.7%), mantle cell lymphoma (5.7%), B lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (2.9%), and PTLD (2.9%) (Figure 1). Han et al reported that 2.9% of NP lymphoma cases were HL [9]. However, there were no cases of HL in our study. Compared to the western literature, the incidence of NKTCL in our study was relatively high [9] (Table 3).
In our study, the average age of the patients was 59.6 years, and there was a slight male preponderance, similar to previous studies of NP lymphoma [2,3,4,9]. However, we did not find any correlation between sex or age and survival, which is different from what previously reported [2,9,32]. These conflicting results may be due to different sample sizes and races examined in different studies.
Symptoms and signs of NP lymphoma include neck mass (69–85%), epistaxis (19-33%), hearing loss (8–23%), nasal discharge (15–51%), and nasal obstruction (50–88%) [3,6]. Since all of these symptoms may occur in patients with any NP mass, it is important to differentiate NP lymphomas from other NP tumors. The major difference is that some patients with NP lymphomas may suffer from constitutional symptoms (18–27%), the so-called B symptoms, including weight loss, night sweats, and fevers, which are less common in patients with other NP tumors [3,6,9]. However, some patients may have no symptoms at diagnosis [33]. Naturally, the only method for a definite diagnosis is a biopsy-based pathological analysis. In our study, the common symptoms included nasal obstruction (28.9%), epistaxis (25.7%), neck mass (22.9%), purulent rhinorrhea (17.1%), headache (14.3%), and B symptoms (14.3%). Cervical nodal involvement was relatively limited in our study compared to other studies [6]. Moreover, neck lymph node involvement was only found in cases with NP-DLBCL. B symptoms have been reported to be associated with poor prognosis [34], but this correlation was not confirmed in our study.
The average duration of the symptoms before the diagnosis of NP lymphoma was not mentioned in related studies. However, there was a study regarding a lymphoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses, in which the average duration of the symptoms was 5.9 months prior to diagnosis [35]. In the same study, improved survival was found in patients who had symptoms for less than 3 months (70%) compared with those who had symptoms for more than 3 months (25%) [35]. In our study, the average time from initial symptoms to diagnosis ranged from 0.5 to 12 months (mean 2.6 months), and there was a significant difference of symptom duration between NP-DLBCL and NP-NKTCL (1.53 months vs. 4.33 months, p = 0.009). Because most symptoms of NP lymphoma are non-specific, patients may be diagnosed late when they are at an advanced stage. Therefore, it is important to be cautious when approaching patients with these symptoms.
In southern Asia, NPC is a relatively common malignancy. Its incidence in southern China is estimated to be approximately 10–50 cases per 100,000 [36], while the incidence is rare in Western countries, around 2.2/100,000 [37]. In Taiwan, the latest cancer registry data released by the government showed that the incidence of NPC is 3.2–9.8 per 100,000, while the incidence of NHL is around 9.1–11.9 per 100,000 [38]. Therefore, it is important to differentiate NP lymphomas from NPC in patients presenting with NP tumors in endemic areas with a high incidence of NPC, such as Taiwan.
Treatments for lymphoma include systemic CT, RT, PBSCT, targeted therapy (e.g., anti-CD20), and combined therapy [39]. B-Cell NHL has been found to be more sensitive to anthracycline-based CT than NKTCL [40]. Wu et al. also found that WR-DLBCL was more responsive to chemotherapy than WR-NKTCL [7]. The suitable treatment modality usually depends on the subtype of the lymphoma. Miller et al. reported that CT followed by involved-field RT was superior to CT alone for the treatment of localized intermediate- and high-grade NHL [41]. Aviles et al. focused on WR-NHL and revealed that OS was better for patients in the combined-therapy arm (90%) than for those in the CT arm (58%) and RT arm (56%) [42]. Han et al. has proposed that RT is a positive prognostic indicator for NP lymphomas, with the exception of NKTCL [9].
Because this is a retrospective study, there were heterogeneous treatment modalities for the NP lymphoma patients. In our study, more than 90% (n = 33) of patients received CT, while only one patient diagnosed with MALToma received RT alone, and this patient had a 25.7-month disease-free survival time. Among patients who received CT (n = 33), 24.2% of them (n = 8) also received RT concomitantly or sequentially. More cases of NP-DLBCL received CT alone, while more cases of NP-NKTCL received combined CT and RT. The five-year OS was 54.5% in the CT group and 41.7% in the combined chemoradiotherapy group, but there was no significant difference. However, a higher 10-year OS was observed in patients who received combined therapy. In subgroup analysis, the OS of DLBCL patients receiving CT and combined chemoradiotherapy were 90.0 months and 87.0 months, respectively (p = 0.920). In the subgroup of NKTCL, the OS of CT-treated and combined chemoradiotherapy-treated patients was 36.7 months and 81.2 months, respectively (p = 0.260). Interestingly, studies regarding the Western population showed no evidence of survival benefit from RT for DLBCL patients, but a trend of improved survival after combined chemoradiotherapy was found for our NKTCL patients [43].
Regarding OS of NP lymphomas, Han et al. [9] reported a five-year OS of 57%, while Allam et al. [6] reported a two-year OS rate of 75%, and Laskar et al. reported a five-year OS of 57.9% [3]. In our study, the 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year OS rates were 67.9%, 50.4%, and 33.6%, respectively, which is similar to what reported in other studies. The mean OS of NP-DLBCL and NP-NKTCL patients were 84.4% and 57.2%, respectively, but without statistically significant difference. Similar to Zou et al.’s study, worse survival was found in NP-NKTCL patients compared to patients with early-stage NP B-cell lymphoma (five-year OS: 35.5% vs. 69.5%, p = 0.003) [5]. Yang et al. classified early-stage NKTCL patients into low- and high-risk groups based on age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status, stage II disease, LDH levels, and primary tumor invasion (PTI) [44]. The study found that primary RT improved survival for early-stage NKTCL patients [44]. RT followed by CT improved survival in the high-risk group. In the low-risk group, the five-year OS rate was 88.8% for patients receiving RT alone and 86.3–86.9% for patients receiving combined CT and RT, while it was 72.2% for patients receiving CT after RT and 58.3–59.6% for patients receiving RT after CT or RT alone in the high-risk group [45]. Lee et al. reported that in Ann Arbor stage I–II sinonasal DLBCL patients, there was no difference in survival between patients receiving CT alone and those receiving combined CT and RT [43]. In our study, for the NP-NKTCL patients, superior survival was observed for patients receiving combined CT and RT compared to the patients receiving CT alone (81.7% vs. 36.9%). However, similar OS was observed for patients with NP-DLBCL, no matter whether the patient received combine CT and RT or CT alone. This implies that NP-NKTCL might be more sensitive to RT than NP-DLBCL.
Recurrence rate and sites of recurrence are highly variable in the literature [2,6]. In our study, eight cases (22.9%) had recurrence, including two cases (20%) of DLBCL and one case (11.1%) of NKTCL. According to Wu et al., 50% of patients with WR-DLBCL and 64% of patients with WR-NKTCL had relapse at extranodal sites, with WR-DLBCL having significantly more extensive lymph node involvement than WR-NKTCL [7]. Lee et al. proposed that the relapse rate for DLBCL was 13.8%, with local recurrence being the most common recurrence type [43]. Interestingly, for the eight recurrent cases in our study, the most common recurrence site was the neck (62.5%), and only one patient had local recurrence (12.5%).
EBER positivity for both NPC and NKTCL is very high. However, the frequency of EBER positivity for DLBCL in different geographic regions varies, being higher in Asian countries (8% ± 9%) than in some Western countries (1% ± 3%) [10,18,19,20,21,22]. Koh et al. reported that, in classic HL patients, EBER-positive patients had lower OS than EBER-negative patients [23]. A meta-analysis including 13 studies found that EBER positivity was correlated with adverse clinicopathologic features, worse clinical course, and poor outcome [10]. Plasma EBV DNA, derived from the apoptosis of lymphoma cells, is reported to be a surrogate biomarker of lymphoma load and may provide prognostic information [46,47]. EBV-associated viral proteins were found to play a crucial role in oncogenesis, including in the regulation of proliferation, immune escape, metastasis, and epigenetic modifications [10,14,15,16,17]. Constitutive expression of latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) was found to lead to activation of NF-kB and JAK/STAT signaling, which protects against apoptosis and activates autocrine/paracrine signals. This further promotes tumor growth and immune evasion [17]. Additionally, previous studies proposed that EBV may induce angiogenesis in the lymphoid tissue when LMP-1 activates angiogenetic factors [23]. Our study is the second study to focus on EBER expression in NP lymphoma. For cases (n = 32) with EBER ISH staining results, 13 cases showed EBER positivity, including cases of NKTCL (n = 7, 100% of NKTCL cases with EBER ISH staining) (Figure 5), DLBCL (n = 5, 31.3% of DLBCL cases with EBER ISH staining) (Figure 4), and PTLD (n = 1). The frequency of EBER positivity for DLBCL was higher than in other studies. The five-year OS of EBER (+) and EBER (−) cases was 55.6% and 58.5%, respectively. In the DLBCL subgroup, five-year OS for EBER (+) and EBER (−) cases was 50% and 85.7%, respectively. Although there was no significant difference, EBER-positive DLBCL patients had poorer prognosis compared to EBER-negative DLBCL patients. The relationship of EBV infection with prognosis in NP lymphoma needs further investigation in the future.
EBER ISH has been considered as the gold standard for evaluating EBER positivity for many years. It allows a direct visualization of the neoplastic cells. However, it is a semi-quantitative analysis, and subtle differences in technical quality cannot be eliminated [10]. More sensitive methods, such as PCR for EBV viral load measurement, EBV-encoded miRNAs detection, and RNAscope assay, may help to confirm whether there is EBV infection in EBER-negative samples [48,49]. However, the NP tissue for PCR analysis should contain only tumor tissue, to avoid biased results.
Gene expression profıling can classify DLBCL into two clinically distinct subgroups, i.e., germinal center B-cell (GCB) and non-GCB, which includes activated B-cell (ABC) [50,51]. The GCB subtype is associated with better outcomes, while the ABC subtype is associated with worse outcomes [52]. Hans et al. divided DLBCL into GCB and non-GCB subgroups by using immunostaining for CD10, bcl-6, and MUM1 and found an outcome similar to that predicted by cDNA microarray analysis [53]. Since our study is a retrospective study, we did not perform a cDNA microarray analysis to divide our DLBCL cases into GCB or ABC. However, several cases were studied by IHC for CD10, bcl-6, and MUM1 expression. Among these, there were one GCB and seven non-GCB lymphomas according to Hans criteria (Supplementary Table S2). This may explain the relatively poor outcomes of our DLBCL cases. Besides, a high proportion of stage IV patients (n = 5, 29.4%) were noted in our DLBCL patients. None of our DLBCL patients relapsed with CNS disease.
NPC is also highly related to EBV, and more than 90% of NPC are EBER-positive. Therefore, it is important to differentiate NP lymphomas from NPC, especially in areas with a high incidence of NPC. NPC usually originates from the posterolateral nasopharynx at the fossa of Rosenmüller, while NP lymphoma usually presents as diffuse swelling of NP under nasal endoscopic examination (Figure 3). The surface of NP lymphomas may be inflamed, with a central necrotic area. According to Liu’s research, NP lymphoma can be distinguished from NPC by MR imaging, for NPC tumor lesions are more likely to be asymmetrical and invade more deeply into tissues, while NP lymphomas are usually symmetric and tend to spread laterally [36]. Otolaryngologists should be wary about making a diagnosis of NP lymphoma, especially in areas endemic with NPC.
There are only few studies reporting the clinical characteristics and prognosis of NP lymphomas, and most of them studied T-cell and B-cell lymphomas as a single group [2,3,4,6,8,9]. Very few studies have specifically addressed the clinical disparities of NP-DLBCL and NP-NKTCL. Our study demonstrated the differences between the two types and also investigated EBER expression in NP lymphoma, especially in an area with high NPC occurrence. However, one limitation of this study is that there was no certain way to determine whether stage IV disease originated from the nasopharynx primarily. Larger-scale studies are needed in the future to better understand the development of this rare disease.

5. Conclusions

NP lymphoma is a rare malignancy developing in the head and neck region and encompasses a variety of histological subtypes. NP-DLBCL and NP-NKTCL are the two most common subtypes, and there are several differences between them regarding clinical features and prognosis. In endemic areas with a high frequency of NPC occurrence, NP lymphoma should always be considered in the differential diagnosis when approaching a patient with a nasopharyngeal mass.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/8/10/1604/s1, Table S1: Characteristics of stage IV NP lymphoma patients; Table S2: IHC and subtypes of NP DLBCL patients.

Author Contributions

Data curation, C.Y.H., C.F.Y., J.P.G., T.J.C., T.A.L., and L.T.H; Formal analysis, M.Y.L.; Investigation, C.Y.H. and C.F.Y.; Methodology, C.F.Y., and E.C.K.; Project administration, M.Y.L.; Supervision, M.Y.L.; Writing—original draft, C.Y.H.; Writing—review & editing, C.F.Y., E.C.K., and M.Y.L. All authors reviewed the manuscript and approved the final version.

Funding

This research was supported by the grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST106-2314-B-075-035-MY3) and Veterans General Hospitals University System of Taiwan Joint Research Program (VGHUST108-G4-2-2).

Acknowledgments

We thank Hsin-Yi Huang from the Biostatistics Task Force, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, for the statistical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Swerdlow, S.H.; Campo, E.; Pileri, S.A.; Harris, N.L.; Stein, H.; Siebert, R.; Advani, R.; Ghielmini, M.; Salles, G.A.; Zelenetz, A.D.; et al. The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms. Blood 2016, 127, 2375–2390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Lei, K.I.; Suen, J.J.; Hui, P.; Tong, M.; Li, W.; Yau, S.H. Primary nasal and nasopharyngeal lymphomas: A comparative study of clinical presentation and treatment outcome. Clin. Oncol. R. Coll. Radiol. 1999, 11, 379–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Laskar, S.; Muckaden, M.A.; Bahl, G.; de Sandeep, R.N.; Gupta, S.; Bakshi, A.; Prabhash, K.; Maru, D.; Gujral, S.; Parikh, P.; et al. Primary non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma of the nasopharynx: Prognostic factors and outcome of 113 Indian patients. Leuk. Lymphoma 2006, 47, 2132–2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mitarnun, W.; Suwiwat, S.; Pradutkanchana, J. Epstein-Barr virus-associated extranodal non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma of the sinonasal tract and nasopharynx in Thailand. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2006, 7, 91–94. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Zou, G.R.; Zhang, Y.J.; Xie, F.Y.; Zheng, W.; Li, H.X.; Xia, Y.F.; Lin, T.Y.; Lu, T.X. Prognosis and treatment strategies of primary B-cell and NK/T-cell nasopharyngeal non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma at early stage. Ai Zheng 2006, 25, 1543–1549. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Allam, W.; Ismaili, N.; Elmajjaoui, S.; Elgueddari, B.K.; Ismaili, M.; Errihani, H. Primary nasopharyngeal non-Hodgkin lymphomas: A retrospective review of 26 Moroccan patients. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. 2009, 9, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wu, R.Y.; Li, Y.X.; Wang, W.H.; Jin, J.; Wang, S.L.; Liu, Y.P.; Song, Y.W.; Fang, H.; Ren, H.; Liu, Q.F.; et al. Clinical disparity and favorable prognoses for patients with Waldeyer ring extranodal nasal-type NK/T-cell lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014, 37, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Owosho, A.A.; Gooden, C.E.; McBee, A.G. Hodgkin lymphoma of the nasopharynx: Case report with review of the literature. Head Neck Pathol. 2015, 9, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Han, A.Y.; Kuan, E.C.; Alonso, J.E.; Badran, K.W.; St John, M.A. Epidemiology of nasopharyngeal lymphoma in the United States: A population-based analysis of 1119 cases. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2017, 156, 870–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gao, X.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Liu, S.; Yue, B. Clinical characteristics and prognostic significance of EBER positivity in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0199398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rosenberg, S.A.; Diamond, H.D.; Jaslowitz, B.; Craver, L.F. Lymphosarcoma: A review of 1269 cases. Medicine 1961, 40, 31–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hoppe, R.T.; Burke, J.S.; Glatstein, E.; Kaplan, H.S. Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: Involvement of Waldeyer’s ring. Cancer 1978, 42, 1096–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Saul, S.H.; Kapadia, S.B. Primary lymphoma of Waldeyer’s ring: Clinicopathologic study of 68 cases. Cancer 1985, 56, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Thorley-Lawson, D.A. Epstein-Barr virus: Exploiting the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2001, 1, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gruhne, B.; Sompallae, R.; Masucci, M.G. Three Epstein-Barr virus latency proteins independently promote genomic instability by inducing DNA damage, inhibiting DNA repair and inactivating cell cycle checkpoints. Oncogene 2009, 28, 3997–4008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mesri, E.A.; Feitelson, M.A.; Munger, K. Human viral oncogenesis: A cancer hallmarks analysis. Cell Host Microbe 2014, 15, 266–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shannon-Lowe, C.; Rickinson, A.B.; Bell, A.I. Epstein-Barr virus-associated lymphomas. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2017, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Park, S.; Lee, J.; Ko, Y.H.; Han, A.; Jun, H.J.; Lee, S.C.; Hwang, I.G.; Park, Y.H.; Ahn, J.S.; Jung, C.W.; et al. The impact of Epstein-Barr virus status on clinical outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood 2007, 110, 972–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sato, A.; Nakamura, N.; Kojima, M.; Ohmachi, K.; Carreras, J.; Kikuti, Y.Y.; Numata, H.; Ohgiya, D.; Tazume, K.; Amaki, J.; et al. Clinical outcome of Epstein-Barr virus-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the elderly in the rituximab era. Cancer Sci. 2014, 105, 1170–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hong, J.Y.; Ko, Y.H.; Kim, S.J.; Kim, W.S. Epstein-Barr virus-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the elderly: A concise review and update. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 2015, 27, 392–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ok, C.Y.; Papathomas, T.G.; Medeiros, L.J.; Young, K.H. EBV-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the elderly. Blood 2013, 122, 328–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Ok, C.Y.; Li, L.; Xu-Monette, Z.Y.; Visco, C.; Tzankov, A.; Manyam, G.C.; Montes-Moreno, S.; Dybkaer, K.; Chiu, A.; Orazi, A.; et al. Prevalence and clinical implications of epstein-barr virus infection in de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in Western countries. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 20, 2338–2349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Koh, Y.W.; Han, J.H.; Yoon, D.H.; Suh, C.; Huh, J. Epstein-Barr virus positivity is associated with angiogenesis in, and poorer survival of, patients receiving standard treatment for classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Hematol. Oncol. 2018, 36, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Carbone, P.P.; Kaplan, H.S.; Musshoff, K.; Smithers, D.W.; Tubiana, M. Report of the Committee on Hodgkin’s Disease Staging Classification. Cancer Res. 1971, 31, 1860–1861. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Lu, P. Staging and classification of lymphoma. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2005, 35, 160–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Smith, A.; Crouch, S.; Lax, S.; Li, J.; Painter, D.; Howell, D.; Patmore, R.; Jack, A.; Roman, E. Lymphoma incidence, survival and prevalence 2004–2014: Sub-type analyses from the UK’s Haematological Malignancy Research Network. Br. J. Cancer 2015, 112, 1575–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sun, J.; Yang, Q.; Lu, Z.; He, M.; Gao, L.; Zhu, M.; Sun, L.; Wei, L.; Li, M.; Liu, C.; et al. Distribution of lymphoid neoplasms in China: Analysis of 4638 cases according to the World Health Organization classification. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2012, 138, 429–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Good, D.J.; Gascoyne, R.D. Classification of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Hematol. Oncol. Clin. North Am. 2008, 22, 781–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shih, L.Y.; Liang, D.C. Non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas in Asia. Hematol. Oncol. Clin. North Am. 1991, 5, 983–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ko, Y.H.; Kim, C.W.; Park, C.S.; Jang, H.K.; Lee, S.S.; Kim, S.H.; Ree, H.J.; Lee, J.D.; Kim, S.W.; Huh, J.R. REAL classification of malignant lymphomas in the Republic of Korea: Incidence of recently recognized entities and changes in clinicopathologic features. Hematolymphoreticular Study Group of the Korean Society of Pathologists. Revised European-American lymphoma. Cancer 1998, 83, 806–812. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ye, Y.L.; Zhou, M.H.; Lu, X.Y.; Dai, Y.R.; Wu, W.X. Nasopharyngeal and nasal malignant lymphoma: A clinicopathological study of 54 cases. Histopathology 1992, 20, 511–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wulfrank, D.; Speelman, T.; Pauwels, C.; Roels, H.; De Schryver, A. Extranodal non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma of the head and neck. Radiother. Oncol. 1987, 8, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. O’Reilly, B.J.; Kershaw, J.B. Hodgkin’s disease of the nasopharynx. J. Laryngol. Otol. 1987, 101, 506–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Urquhart, A.; Berg, R. Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma of the head and neck. Laryngoscope 2001, 111, 1565–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Steele, T.O.; Buniel, M.C.; Mace, J.C.; El Rassi, E.; Smith, T.L. Lymphoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses: A case series. Am. J. Rhinol. Allergy 2016, 30, 335–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, X.W.; Xie, C.M.; Mo, Y.X.; Zhang, R.; Li, H.; Huang, Z.L.; Geng, Z.J.; Zheng, L.; Lv, Y.C.; Wu, P.H. Magnetic resonance imaging features of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and nasopharyngeal non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: Are there differences? Eur. J. Radiol. 2012, 81, 1146–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Health Promotion Administration. Taiwan Cancer Registry Database 2016. Available online: https://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=269&pid=10227 (accessed on 1 April 2019).
  39. Yamaguchi, M.; Miyazaki, K. Current treatment approaches for NK/T-cell lymphoma. J. Clin. Exp. Hematop. 2017, 57, 98–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yang, C.W.; Wang, C.W.; Hong, R.L.; Tsai, C.L.; Yao, M.; Tang, J.L.; Lin, C.W.; Cheng, A.L.; Kuo, S.H. Treatment outcomes of and prognostic factors for definitive radiotherapy with and without chemotherapy for Stage I/II nasal extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma. J. Radiat. Res. 2017, 58, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Miller, T.P.; Dahlberg, S.; Cassady, J.R.; Adelstein, D.J.; Spier, C.M.; Grogan, T.M.; LeBlanc, M.; Carlin, S.; Chase, E.; Fisher, R.I. Chemotherapy alone compared with chemotherapy plus radiotherapy for localized intermediate- and high-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998, 339, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Aviles, A.; Delgado, S.; Ruiz, H.; de la Torre, A.; Guzman, R.; Talavera, A. Treatment of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma of Waldeyer’s ring: Radiotherapy versus chemotherapy versus combined therapy. Eur. J. Cancer. B Oral Oncol. 1996, 32, 19–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lee, G.W.; Go, S.I.; Kim, S.H.; Hong, J.; Kim, Y.R.; Oh, S.; Kim, S.Y.; Do, Y.R.; Lee, H.; Lee, S.I.; et al. Clinical outcome and prognosis of patients with primary sinonasal tract diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with rituximab-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone chemotherapy: A study by the Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma. Leuk. Lymphoma 2015, 56, 1020–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yang, Y.; Cao, J.Z.; Lan, S.M.; Wu, J.X.; Wu, T.; Zhu, S.Y.; Qian, L.T.; Hou, X.R.; Zhang, F.Q.; Zhang, Y.J.; et al. Association of improved locoregional control with prolonged survival in early-stage extranodal nasal-type natural killer/t-cell lymphoma. JAMA Oncol. 2017, 3, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Yang, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Cao, J.Z.; Zhang, Y.J.; Xu, L.M.; Yuan, Z.Y.; Wu, J.X.; Wang, W.; Wu, T.; Lu, B.; et al. Risk-adapted therapy for early-stage extranodal nasal-type NK/T-cell lymphoma: Analysis from a multicenter study. Blood 2015, 126, 1424–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Suzuki, R. Pathogenesis and treatment of extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma. Semin. Hematol. 2014, 51, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Tse, E.; Au-Yeung, R.; Kwong, Y.L. Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of natural killer/T-cell lymphomas. Expert Rev. Hematol. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Mundo, L.; Ambrosio, M.R.; Picciolini, M.; Lo Bello, G.; Gazaneo, S.; Del Porro, L.; Lazzi, S.; Navari, M.; Onyango, N.; Granai, M.; et al. Unveiling another missing piece in ebv-driven lymphomagenesis: EBV-Encoded microRNAs expression in EBER-negative burkitt lymphoma cases. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mundo, L.; Ambrosio, M.; Del Porro, L.; Granai, M.; Mancini, V.; Schiavoni, G.; Anagnostopoulos, I.; Falini, B.; Lazzi, S.; Tiacci, E. EBV leaves its mark: New evidence of hypothesis in b-cell lymphomas from non-conventional methods. Hematol. Oncol. 2019, 37, 529–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rosenwald, A.; Wright, G.; Chan, W.C.; Connors, J.M.; Campo, E.; Fisher, R.I.; Gascoyne, R.D.; Muller-Hermelink, H.K.; Smeland, E.B.; Giltnane, J.M.; et al. The use of molecular profiling to predict survival after chemotherapy for diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 346, 1937–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shipp, M.A.; Ross, K.N.; Tamayo, P.; Weng, A.P.; Kutok, J.L.; Aguiar, R.C.; Gaasenbeek, M.; Angelo, M.; Reich, M.; Pinkus, G.S.; et al. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma outcome prediction by gene-expression profiling and supervised machine learning. Nat. Med. 2002, 8, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nowakowski, G.S.; Czuczman, M.S. ABC, GCB, and double-hit diffuse large b-cell lymphoma: Does subtype make a difference in therapy selection? Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Educ. Book 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Hans, C.P.; Weisenburger, D.D.; Greiner, T.C.; Gascoyne, R.D.; Delabie, J.; Ott, G.; Muller-Hermelink, H.K.; Campo, E.; Braziel, R.M.; Jaffe, E.S.; et al. Confirmation of the molecular classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarray. Blood 2004, 103, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jcm 08 01604 g001 550
Figure 1. Histological subtypes of nasopharyngeal (NP) lymphoma. Abbreviations: DLBCL: diffuse large B cell lymphoma; NKTCL: NK/T cell lymphoma; MALToma: extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue; PTLD: post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder.
Figure 1. Histological subtypes of nasopharyngeal (NP) lymphoma. Abbreviations: DLBCL: diffuse large B cell lymphoma; NKTCL: NK/T cell lymphoma; MALToma: extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue; PTLD: post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder.
Jcm 08 01604 g001
Jcm 08 01604 g002 550
Figure 2. MRI and CT images of NP lymphomas. (A) An 85-year-old female diagnosed with NP DLBCL. The MRI revealed that the tumor involved the right NP and right parapharyngeal space. (B) A 73-year-old male diagnosed with NP NKTCL. The CT scan revealed that the tumor involved the right NP.
Figure 2. MRI and CT images of NP lymphomas. (A) An 85-year-old female diagnosed with NP DLBCL. The MRI revealed that the tumor involved the right NP and right parapharyngeal space. (B) A 73-year-old male diagnosed with NP NKTCL. The CT scan revealed that the tumor involved the right NP.
Jcm 08 01604 g002
Jcm 08 01604 g003 550
Figure 3. Endoscopic views of various NP lymphomas. Endoscopic examinations showed various NP lymphomas, which were heterogeneous, from smooth bulging masses to hemorrhagic masses, and some tumors showed necrosis over their surface: (A,B) small lymphocytic lymphoma, (C,D,E) DLBCL, (F) NKTCL, (G,E) mantle cell lymphoma, (I) MALToma.
Figure 3. Endoscopic views of various NP lymphomas. Endoscopic examinations showed various NP lymphomas, which were heterogeneous, from smooth bulging masses to hemorrhagic masses, and some tumors showed necrosis over their surface: (A,B) small lymphocytic lymphoma, (C,D,E) DLBCL, (F) NKTCL, (G,E) mantle cell lymphoma, (I) MALToma.
Jcm 08 01604 g003
Jcm 08 01604 g004 550
Figure 4. Pathologic images of NP-DLBCL. The hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slide shows diffuse proliferation of large atypical lymphoid cells. The neoplastic cells are positive for CD20 and EBER.
Figure 4. Pathologic images of NP-DLBCL. The hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slide shows diffuse proliferation of large atypical lymphoid cells. The neoplastic cells are positive for CD20 and EBER.
Jcm 08 01604 g004
Jcm 08 01604 g005 550
Figure 5. Pathologic images of NP-NKTCL. The H&E-stained slide shows diffuse proliferation of small to medium sized lymphoid cells. The neoplastic lymphoid cells are positive for CD3, CD56, and EBER.
Figure 5. Pathologic images of NP-NKTCL. The H&E-stained slide shows diffuse proliferation of small to medium sized lymphoid cells. The neoplastic lymphoid cells are positive for CD3, CD56, and EBER.
Jcm 08 01604 g005
Jcm 08 01604 g006 550
Figure 6. Overall survival of 35 patients with NP lymphoma in our study.
Figure 6. Overall survival of 35 patients with NP lymphoma in our study.
Jcm 08 01604 g006
Table
Table 1. Demographic, clinical, and histological information of patients with NP lymphoma.
Table 1. Demographic, clinical, and histological information of patients with NP lymphoma.
Case Number (n = 35)
Age17–88 (mean 59.57 ± 18.84)
SexM/F = 20/15
Symptoms
Nasal obstruction10 (28.6%)
Epistaxis9 (25.7%)
Neck mass8 (22.9%)
Purulent Rhinorrhea6 (17.1%)
Headache5 (14.3%)
B symptoms5 (14.3%)
Symptom Duration0.5–12 (mean 2.61 ± 2.97)
Location of Disease
NP only22 (62.9%)
NP + neck/distant LN *10 (28.6%)
NP + adjacent organ #3 (8.6%)
Comorbidity
HTN10 (28.6%)
DM6 (17.1%)
CAD4 (11.4%)
Lab
WBC2400–167800 (mean 12992)
LDH106–1702 (mean 337.7)
EBER
Positive13 (37.1%)
Negative19 (54.3%)
NA3 (8.6%)
Stage (Ann Arbor)
I12 (34.3%)
II15 (42.9%)
IV8 (22.9%)
Treatment
CT20 (57.1%)
RT1 (2.9%)
CT+RT6 (17.1%)
CT+PBSCT5 (14.3%)
CT+RT+PBSCT2 (5.7%)
No treatment1 (2.9%)
Recurrence8 (22.9%)
Dead19 (54.3%)
# sinonasal cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx; *gastrointestinal (GI) tract, inguinal lymph node (LN), neck LN. Abbreviation: CT: chemotherapy; RT: radiotherapy; PBSCT: peripheral blood stem cell transplantation; EBER: Epstein–Barr virus-encoded small RNAs; NA: not available; HTN: hypertension; DM: Diabetes mellitus; CAD: Coronary artery disease; WBC: white blood cell count; LDH: lactic dehydrogenase.
Table
Table 2. Demographic and histopathological characteristics of NP-DLBCL and NP-NKTCL patients.
Table 2. Demographic and histopathological characteristics of NP-DLBCL and NP-NKTCL patients.
DLBCL(n = 17)NKTCL(n = 9)
CharacteristicNo (%)No (%)P value
Sex 0.683
    male9 (52.90%)6 (66.70%)
    female8 (47.10%)3 (33.30%)
Age61.59+/-22.49 (17-88)59.44+/-17.27 (38-81) 0.806
Duration(months)1.53+/-0.86 (0.5-4)4.33+/-3.94 (1-12)0.009
Stage 0.324
    I4 (23.50%)5 (55.60%)
    II8 (47.10%)3 (33.30%)
    IV5 (29.40%)1 (11.10%)
Location of Disease 0.822
    NP only11 (64.70%)7 (77.80%)
    NP+ neck/distant LN *4 (23.50%)1 (11.10%)
    NP+ adjacent organ #2 (11.80%)1 (11.10%)
EBER † 0.005
    Positive5 (31.25%)7 (100%)†
    Negative11 (68.75%)0 (0%)
B symptoms1 (5.90%)2 (22.2%)0.268
Cervical Node Involvement4 (23.50%)0 (0%)0.263
Treatment 0.394
    CT only12 (75%)5 (55.60%)
    CT+RT4 (25%)4 (44.40%)
Recurrence *4 (23.53%)1 (11.10%)0.628
Dead10 (58.82%)6 (66.70%)1
Overall survival25.90%16.10%0.515
    3-year64.70%55.60%0.505
    5-year48.50%55.60%0.803
    10-year38.80%18.50%0.417
# sinonasal cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, * GI tract, inguinal LN, neck LN. † There were 3 missing data, 1 of DLBCL and 2 of NKTCL.
Table
Table 3. Summary of studies of NP lymphoma.
Table 3. Summary of studies of NP lymphoma.
YearAuthorCountryNo.AgeSex
(M/F)		Tumor PathologyEBER
(+)		TreatmentSurvival
(OS)
DLBCLNKTCL OtherCTRTCT + RT
1999Lei [2]China195115/411(57.9%)5(26.3%)3(15.8%)NA6(32%)2(11%)11(58%)5-Y OS:82%
5-Y DFS:76%
2006Laskar [3]India1134079/3494(83.2%)0
T-cell 		19(16.8%)NA25(22%)0(0)86(76%)5-Y OS:57.9%
5-Y DFS:55.8%
2 expired before treatment
2006Zou [5]China80NANA48(60%)
B-cell 		32(40%) 0NA31(38.8%)7(8.8%)42(84%)5-Y OS
B-cell origin: 69.5%
NKTCL: 35.5%
5-Yprogression-free survival:
B-cell origin: 53.3%
NKTCL: 28.9%
2006Mitarnun [4]Thailand4257.224/1835(83.3%)3(7.1%)4(9.5%)9/42
(21.4%) 		NANANANA
2009Allam [6]Morroco2652.7NA13(50%)4(15.4%)
T cell		9(34.6%)NA 27%0(0)73%1-Y OS:87%
1-Y DFS: 71%
DLBCL:2-Y OS:75%
2014Wu [7]China6149
all WR		NA32(52.5%)29(47.5%)0NANANANAWR-NKTCL
5-Y OS:68%
WR-DLBCL
5-Y OS: 74%
2017Han [9]USA111959.3658/461867(77.5%)
B-cell		67(6.0%) 185(16.5%)NANA452(41.5%) NA2-Y OS:70%
5-Y OS:57%
10-Y OS:45%
2-Y DSS:77%
5-Y DSS:68%
10-Y DSS:62%
2019HsuehTaiwan3559.620/1517(48.6%)9(25.7%)9(25.7%)13/32
(37.1%)		25(71.4%)1(2.9%)8(22.9%)DLBCL:
3-Y OS:64.7%
5-Y OS:48.5%
10-Y OS:38.8%
NKTCL:
3-Y OS:55.6%
5-Y OS:55.6%
10-Y OS:18.5%
Abbreviations: WR: Waldeyer’ ring; DLBCL: diffuse large B cell lymphoma; NKTCL: NK/T cell lymphoma; NP: nasopharynx; CT: chemotherapy; RT: radiotherapy; OS: overall survival; DSS: disease specific survival; DFS: disease free survival; EBER: Epstein–Barr virus-encoded small RNAs.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hsueh, C.-Y.; Yang, C.-F.; Gau, J.-P.; Kuan, E.C.; Ho, C.-Y.; Chiou, T.-J.; Hsiao, L.-T.; Lin, T.-A.; Lan, M.-Y. Nasopharyngeal Lymphoma: A 22-Year Review of 35 Cases. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1604. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8101604

AMA Style

Hsueh C-Y, Yang C-F, Gau J-P, Kuan EC, Ho C-Y, Chiou T-J, Hsiao L-T, Lin T-A, Lan M-Y. Nasopharyngeal Lymphoma: A 22-Year Review of 35 Cases. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2019; 8(10):1604. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8101604

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hsueh, Chien-Yu, Ching-Fen Yang, Jyh-Pyng Gau, Edward C. Kuan, Ching-Yin Ho, Tzeon-Jye Chiou, Liang-Tsai Hsiao, Ting-An Lin, and Ming-Ying Lan. 2019. "Nasopharyngeal Lymphoma: A 22-Year Review of 35 Cases" Journal of Clinical Medicine 8, no. 10: 1604. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8101604

APA Style

Hsueh, C.-Y., Yang, C.-F., Gau, J.-P., Kuan, E. C., Ho, C.-Y., Chiou, T.-J., Hsiao, L.-T., Lin, T.-A., & Lan, M.-Y. (2019). Nasopharyngeal Lymphoma: A 22-Year Review of 35 Cases. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8(10), 1604. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8101604

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop