Next Article in Journal
Long-Term Effects of Spironolactone on Kidney Function and Hyperkalemia-Associated Hospitalization in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Ultrasound Imaging for the Cutaneous Nerves of the Extremities and Relevant Entrapment Syndromes: From Anatomy to Clinical Implications
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 7
Issue 11
10.3390/jcm7110458
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bidirectional Association between Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Gallstone Disease: A Cohort Study

by
Yoosoo Chang
1,2,3,
Yoo-Hun Noh
4,*,
Byung-Seong Suh
1,
Yejin Kim
2,
Eunju Sung
5,
Hyun-Suk Jung
2,
Chan-Won Kim
2,
Min-Jung Kwon
6,
Kyung Eun Yun
2,
Jin-Won Noh
7,8,
Hocheol Shin
2,5,
Yong Kyun Cho
9 and
Seungho Ryu
1,2,3,*
1
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 03181, Korea
2
Center for cohort studies, Total Healthcare Center, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 04514, Korea
3
Department of Clinical Research Design & Evaluation, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06351, Korea
4
Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea
5
Department of Family Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 03181, Korea
6
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 03131, Korea
7
Department of Healthcare Management and Institute of Global Healthcare Research, Eulji University, Seongnam 13135, Korea
8
Global Health Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9712, The Netherlands
9
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 03181, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7(11), 458; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7110458
Submission received: 26 October 2018 / Revised: 19 November 2018 / Accepted: 19 November 2018 / Published: 21 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Gastroenterology & Hepatopancreatobiliary Medicine)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and gallstone disease (GD) are often found to coexist but the sequential relationship of NAFLD and GD to each other remains controversial. We prospectively evaluated the bidirectional relationship of NAFLD with GD. A cohort study was performed on Korean adults who underwent a health checkup and were followed annually or biennially for a mean of 6.0 years. Fatty liver and gallstones were diagnosed by ultrasound. NAFLD was defined as hepatic steatosis on ultrasonography in the absence of excessive alcohol use or other identifiable causes. The NAFLD severity was determined by non-invasive fibrosis markers. Among 283,446 participants without either gallstones or cholecystectomy at baseline, 6440 participants developed gallstones. Among 219,641 participants without NAFLD at baseline, 49,301 participants developed NAFLD. The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for incident gallstone comparing the NAFLD group vs. the non-NAFLD group was 1.26 (1.17–1.35). Increased non-invasive fibrosis markers of NAFLD were positively associated with an increased incidence of gallstones in a graded and dose-responsive manner (p-trend < 0.01). The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for incident NAFLD comparing gallstone and cholecystectomy to no GD were 1.14 (1.07–1.22) and 1.17 (1.03–1.33), respectively. This large-scale cohort study of young and middle-aged individuals demonstrated a bidirectional association between NAFLD and GD. NAFLD and its severity were independently associated with an increased incidence of gallstones, while GD and cholecystectomy were also associated with incident NAFLD. Our findings indicate that the conditions may affect each other, requiring further studies to elucidate the potential mechanisms underlying this association.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is becoming one of the most common liver disorders in parallel with the global increase in obesity and type 2 diabetes [1]. NAFLD encompasses a spectrum of liver disorders ranging from simple steatosis to inflammatory steatohepatitis (NASH) with or without fibrosis/cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma [2,3]. In addition to its liver-related complications, NAFLD is associated with significant non-liver morbidity, impaired health-related quality of life, and a higher use of health care resources [4,5]. NAFLD has been traditionally considered a consequence of metabolic syndrome (MetS), also known as insulin resistance syndrome, but the relationship of NAFLD with MetS is complex, and a growing body of evidence suggests the NAFLD-MetS relationship as being bidirectional in nature [6,7,8,9,10,11]. Gallstone disease (GD) is also a common condition whose prevalence is increasing with the ongoing rise in obesity, and represents a major epidemiologic and economic burden worldwide [12]. NAFLD and GD are commonly found to coexist [13,14,15,16] and have similar associated risk factors, including insulin resistance, obesity, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes [12,17,18]. Insulin resistance is considered a pivotal feature of both NAFLD and cholesterol gallstone [19,20]. Additionally, the severity of insulin resistance correlates with liver histology in patients with NAFLD [17,21]. Until now, to our knowledge, only two longitudinal cohort studies among Chinese and Taiwanese populations have examined the association between NAFLD and GD, without consideration of hepatic fibrosis [22,23]. Furthermore, no longitudinal cohort study has evaluated whether gallstones or cholecystectomy are associated with increased risk of developing NAFLD. Recent reports suggest that the gallbladder and bile acids appear to play a role in systemic metabolic regulation, and cholecystectomy itself may contribute to NAFLD development [18,24]. Currently, the sequential relationship of NAFLD and GD remains unclear, and, to the best of our knowledge, no longitudinal cohort data on a bidirectional association between NAFLD and GD are available.
We examined whether NAFLD and its severity, based on noninvasive fibrosis markers, are associated with incident GD compared with no NAFLD, and sought determine whether gallstones and cholecystectomy are associated with an increased risk of developing NAFLD in a large cohort of Korean men and women who underwent a health screening program.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Population

The Kangbuk Samsung Health Study is a cohort study of South Korean adults who underwent a comprehensive annual or biennial health examination at Kangbuk Samsung Hospital Total Healthcare Center in Seoul and Suwon, South Korea [25,26]. More than 80% of the participants were employees of various companies and local governmental organizations and their spouses. In South Korea, the Industrial Safety and Health Law requires annual or biennial health screening exams for all employees, offered free of charge. The remaining participants voluntarily registered for the screening exams.
The present analysis included study participants who underwent the comprehensive health examinations from January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2016, and who had at least one other screening exam before December 31, 2017 (n = 353,637; Figure 1). We excluded 62,479 subjects who had any of the following conditions at baseline: missing data for abdominal ultrasonography, body mass index (BMI), or components of noninvasive fibrosis markers (n = 1092); history of malignancy (n = 4572); known liver disease or current use of medications for liver disease (n = 17,757); a history of liver cirrhosis or findings of liver cirrhosis based on ultrasound (n = 96); alcohol intake of ≥30 g/day for men or ≥20 g/day for women [1] (n = 37,768); positive serologic markers for hepatitis B or C virus (n = 13,242); or use of medications associated with NAFLD within the past year such as valproate, amiodarone, methotrexate, tamoxifen, or corticosteroids (n = 1101) [1]. Because some participants met more than one exclusion criterion, a total of 291,158 participants were eligible for this study. For the analysis of the impact of NAFLD on the development of gallstones, we excluded 7712 subjects with either gallstones or cholecystectomy at baseline, leaving 283,446 to be included in the final analysis. For the analysis of the impact of gallstones and cholecystectomy on incident NAFLD, 71,517 subjects with NAFLD at baseline were excluded, leaving 219,641 to be included in the final analysis. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, which waived the requirement for informed consent because we accessed only de-identified data routinely collected as part of health screening examinations.

2.2. Measurements

Baseline and follow-up examinations were conducted at the Kangbuk Samsung Hospital Total Healthcare Center [25]. Data on medical history, medication use, and health-related behaviors were collected through a self-administered questionnaire, while the physical measurements, ultrasound, and serum biochemical parameters were measured by trained staff during the health examinations. All variables were assessed at each visit.
Blood pressure, height, weight and waist circumference were measured by trained nurses. Obesity and abdominal obesity were defined as BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 following Asian-specific criteria [27]. Hypertension was defined as a systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg, a diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg, a self-reported history of hypertension, or current use of anti-hypertensive medications.
Blood specimens were sampled from the antecubital vein after the individual had undergone at least a 10-h fast. The fasting blood sample measurements included total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), glucose, uric acid, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), albumin, and platelet counts.
To assess the risk of severe NAFLD, three non-invasive indices of liver fibrosis were used: NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS), fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), and aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index (APRI). NFS was calculated according to the following published formula: NFS = −1.675 + 0.037 × age (years) + 0.094 × BMI (kg/m2) + 1.13 × impaired fasting glucose or diabetes (yes = 1, no = 0) + 0.99 × AST/ALT ratio − 0.013 × platelet (×109/L) − 0.66 × albumin (g/dL). Two cutoff points were selected to categorize subjects with NAFLD into three groups according to their probability of advanced fibrosis: high (NFS > 0.676), intermediate (NFS: 0.676 to −1.455), and low (NFS < −1.455) [28]. The FIB-4 index was calculated by the following formula: FIB-4 = (age (years) × AST (U/L))/(platelet count (×109/L) × ALT (U/L)1/2). For histologically defined NASH with advanced fibrosis, the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, and specificity of FIB-4 are 0.86 (95% CI, 0.78–0.94), 85%, and 65%, respectively [29]. Cut-off values from the curve were used to define low (FIB-4 < 1.30), intermediate, and high (FIB-4 ≥ 2.67) probabilities of advanced fibrosis [30]. The APRI was calculated by the following formula: APRI = 100 × (AST/upper limit of normal)/platelet count (×109/L). Cut-offs for low and high probability of advanced fibrosis were 0.5 and 1.5, respectively [31]. Since a very small number of participants were identified as having NAFLD and high probability of advanced fibrosis based on non-invasive fibrosis markers, we combined the intermediate and high fibrosis score groups.
Abdominal ultrasound scans were performed by experienced radiologists, all unaware of the study aims, using a 3.5 MHz probe. Images were captured in a standard fashion with the patient in the supine position with the right arm raised above the head. The liver, gallbladder, pancreas, kidneys and spleen were evaluated in a standard fashion at each visit. An ultrasonographic diagnosis of fatty liver was determined based on known standard criteria, including a diffuse increase of fine echoes in the liver parenchyma compared with kidney or spleen parenchyma, deep beam attenuation, and bright vessel walls [32]. The inter-observer reliability and intra-observer reliability for fatty liver diagnosis were substantial (kappa statistic of 0.74) and excellent (kappa statistic of 0.94), respectively. NAFLD was defined as the presence of fatty liver in the absence of excessive alcohol use (a threshold of < 20 g/day for women and < 30 g/day for men) or other identifiable cause, as described in the exclusion criteria.
Gallstones were defined as ultrasound-documented gallstones by the presence of strong intraluminal echoes that were gravity dependent or that attenuated ultrasound transmission (acoustic shadowing) [33]. Cholecystectomy was defined as evidence of a cholecystectomy (a right upper quadrant or epigastric scar and the absence of a gallbladder) [33]. The inter-observer reliability and intra-observer reliability for gallstone diagnosis were excellent (kappa statistics of 0.90 and 0.96, respectively).

2.3. Statistical Analyses

Student’s t-test for continuous variables with normal distribution, Kruskal-Wallis test for variables with non-normal distribution, and a Chi-square test for categorical variables were used to compare the characteristics of the study participants at baseline according to incident GD.
Incidence density was expressed as the number of cases divided by person-years. Follow-up for each participant extended from the baseline exam until the development of the endpoint or the last health exam. Since we knew that the endpoint had developed between two visits but did not know the precise time, we used a parametric proportional hazard model to take into account this type of interval censoring (stpm command in Stata) [34]. In these models, the baseline hazard function was parameterized with restricted cubic splines in log time with four degrees of freedom. We estimated the adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for endpoints. We assessed the proportional hazards assumption by examining graphs of estimated log(−log) survival; no violation of the assumption was found.

2.3.1. Baseline NAFLD and Incident GD

A cholecystectomy can be performed due to acalculous gallbladder diseases such as gallbladder polyps, tumors, acalculous cholecystitis, and biliary dyskinesia, which collectively represent between 5% and 30% of laparoscopic cholecystectomies [35,36]. Because the indications for the cholecystectomies were not available, we used ultrasound-documented gallstones as the primary endpoint. We estimated the adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for incidental gallstones by comparing NAFLD with a low fibrosis score and NAFLD with an intermediate to high fibrosis score to the no-NAFLD group among subjects without gallstone disease at baseline.
The models were initially adjusted for age and sex and then further adjusted for BMI, study center, year of examination, education level, smoking, alcohol intake, exercise, total calorie intake, history of hypertension, history of diabetes, and medication for dyslipidemia. To assess whether the relationship between NAFLD and incident GD was mediated by LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides, HOMA-IR, or hsCRP, we included those variables in multivariable models. To determine the linear trends of risk, the number of categories was used as a continuous variable and tested on each model.
We performed subgroup analysis according to the presence of obesity to evaluate the association between NAFLD and gallstones in non-obese and obese individuals, since NAFLD is closely associated with obesity, and adjustment for BMI may not be enough to control for the effects of obesity. In sensitivity analyses, we analyzed the association between NAFLD and cholecystectomy as well. We also performed a sensitivity analysis using fatty liver index as a surrogate marker of NAFLD to examine an association between smoking and incident NAFLD. The fatty liver index (FLI) was calculated according to the published formula [37]. The following cutoff values were used: FLI < 30 ruled out and FLI ≥ 60 meant fatty liver [37].

2.3.2. Baseline Gallstone, Cholecystectomy and Incident NAFLD.

The primary endpoint was incident NAFLD. Since studies have reported that cholecystectomy itself was significantly associated with NAFLD, we estimated the aHR with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for incidental NAFLD separately comparing gallstone and cholecystectomy to no GD among subjects without NAFLD at baseline. The models were initially adjusted for age and sex and then further adjusted for BMI, center, year of examination, education level, smoking, alcohol intake, exercise, total calorie intake, history of hypertension, history of diabetes, and medication for dyslipidemia. To assess whether the relationship between GD and incident NAFLD was mediated by LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides, HOMA-IR, or hsCRP, we included those variables in the model.
Since the association between NAFLD and gallstones can differ by sex based on previous study findings, we performed stratified analyses by sex (men vs. women). The interactions by the subgroups were tested using likelihood ratio tests comparing models with versus without multiplicative interaction terms.
Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 15.0 (StataCorp LP, College Station, Texas, TX, USA). All p values were 2-tailed, and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

3. Results

Baseline characteristics of 283,446 participants without GD at baseline are presented according to the presence of incident GD (Table 1). At baseline, the mean (standard deviation) age and BMI of the study subjects were 37.0 (8.0) years and 23.1 (3.2) kg/m2, respectively; 52.4% were male, and the prevalence of NAFLD was 24.3%. NAFLD, obesity, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, BMI, glucose, blood pressure (BP), total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL-C, hepatic enzymes, hsCRP, and HOMA-IR were positively associated with incident GD, and HDL-C and alcohol intake were negatively associated with incident GD.

3.1. Baseline NAFLD and Incident GD

During 1,703,427.0 person-years of follow-up, 6640 participants developed gallstones (overall incidence rate 3.8 per 1000 person-years; 3.9 per 1000 person-years in men and 3.7 per 1000 person-years in women) (Table 2). The median follow-up period for participants was 5.0 years (interquartile range 2.4–8.9, up to 15.8 years). After adjusting for age, sex, BMI, center, year of examination, education level, smoking, alcohol intake, exercise, history of hypertension, history of diabetes, and medication for dyslipidemia, the aHR (95% CI) for incident gallstone comparing the NAFLD group vs. the no NAFLD group was 1.32 (1.22–1.43) in men and 1.35 (1.18–1.53) in women. The association persisted after adjusting for metabolic parameters including LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides, HOMA-IR, or hsCRP. The risk for incidental gallstone did not vary significantly by gender (p for interaction = 0.745). In subgroup analysis stratified by the presence of obesity, defined as BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2, NAFLD was significantly associated with increased risk of incident gallstone in both non-obese and obese individuals (Appendix A).
Table 3 shows the association between NAFLD and its severity based on non-invasive fibrosis markers and the development of gallstones. In multivariate-adjusted models, an increase across baseline NAFLD categories based on NFS predicted an increase in the incidence of gallstones in a graded and dose-responsive manner (p-rend < 0.01). The aHRs (95% CI) for gallstones comparing NAFLD with low NFS and NAFLD with intermediate or high NFS vs. no NAFLD were 1.30 (1.21–1.39) and 1.54 (1.30–1.82), respectively (Table 3 and model 1). Using other fibrosis markers based on FIB-4 and APRI, the results were similar for NAFLD with a low fibrosis score and NAFLD with an intermediate or high score. In the sensitivity analysis (Appendix B), the association of NAFLD based on fatty liver index with incident gallstone was similarly observed.
We also examined the association of NAFLD with the risk for incidental cholecystectomy or a combined endpoint including either gallstone or cholecystectomy (Appendix C). The association between NAFLD and the development of either gallstone or cholecystectomy was observed in both men and women. However, the association between NAFLD and incident cholecystectomy tended to be stronger in women than in men (p for interaction = 0.033).

3.2. Baseline Gallstone, Cholecystectomy and Incident NAFLD

During 1,165,454.7 person-years of follow-up, 49,301 participants developed NAFLD (overall incidence rate 42.3 per 1000 person-years; 68.0 per 1000 person-years in men and 23.5 per 1000 person-years in women) (Table 4). For men, multivariable-adjusted HR (95% CI) for incident NAFLD comparing GD and cholecystectomy to no GD were 1.12 (1.03–1.22) and 1.21 (1.04–1.42), respectively, while for women. the corresponding HR (95% CI) were 1.23 (1.13–1.35) and 0.98 (0.80–1.19), respectively. The increased risk for incidental NAFLD with cholecystectomy was evident in men but not in women (p for interaction = 0.002).

4. Discussion

In this large-scale cohort study of young and middle-ged individuals, we examined the bidirectional relationship between NAFLD and GD during a median of 5 years of follow-up. We found that in one direction, NAFLD was associated with an increased risk of developing GD, and in the other direction, gallstone and cholecystectomy were associated with an increased risk of incident NAFLD. Using the non-invasive fibrosis markers, subjects with NAFLD and intermediate or high NFS had the highest incidence of gallstones, but even with a low probability of hepatic fibrosis based on fibrosis markers, NAFLD was significantly associated with the development of gallstones. These associations persisted even after adjusting for possible confounders, lipid profiles, HOMA-IR, and hsCRP, suggesting bidirectional and independent relationships exist between NAFLD and gallstones.
Previous studies, which have included mostly cross-sectional studies and only a few cohort studies, have evaluated the association between NAFLD and GD, but their relationship remains controversial [38,39,40]. While some of these cross-sectional studies showed an increased prevalence of GD in patients with NAFLD, others reported a relationship in the other direction, showing an increased prevalence of NAFLD in patients with GD or cholecystectomy [13,14,15,16,38,41,42]. Until now, only two cohort studies on the association between NAFLD and GD were available [22,23]. A cohort study of 11,200 Chinese health checkup examinees over 6 years demonstrated that NAFLD was associated with an increased incidence of gallstones, with a stronger association in female participants [23]. The other cohort study, of 1296 Chinese adults with a mean follow-up of 3.51 years, also reported a positive association of NAFLD with GD (22). Likewise, both studies reported that NAFLD predicts the development of GD. However, in a recent pilot study of non-obese, middle-aged patients, liver fat as shown by abdominal magnetic resonance imaging was significantly increased in patients who had undergone cholecystectomy 2 years ago (n = 26) compared to normal patients (n = 16) [43]. Although the association between NAFLD and GD has been hypothesized to be bidirectional, no cohort studies have examined this hypothesis before our study. To the best of our knowledge, this is by far the largest longitudinal cohort study demonstrating a prospective bidirectional relationship between NAFLD and GD, while accounting for a considerable number of possible confounders. NAFLD was independently associated with an increased risk for developing gallstones in both men and women. Even in nonobese men and women, positive association between NAFLD and incident gallstones was observed; thus, the presence of obesity and other metabolic factors could not fully explain these associations. Indeed, NAFLD, even in nonobese individuals, is associated with insulin resistance, impaired glucose tolerance, and metabolic syndrome, all of which are risk factors for GD [11,44,45,46]. Additionally, NAFLD overproduces cholesterol and alters cholesterol metabolism independent of obesity, which might contribute to the formation of cholesterol gallstones [11,47,48].
With regard to NAFLD severity, a recent cross-sectional study in patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD reported that the prevalence of GD increased with advancing fibrosis [41]. In our study, increasing severity of NAFLD from low to intermediate or high NFS at baseline was associated with higher incidence of gallstones in a dose-responsive manner, but even NAFLD with low NFS was also associated with a higher incidence of gallstones when compared with no NAFLD. However, the small number of patients with a high probability of fibrosis in the study did not allow a separate category for a more severe form of NAFLD.
In the other direction, we also demonstrated that both GD and cholecystectomy were associated with an increased risk of developing NAFLD. A significantly increased risk of incident NAFLD was observed in both men and women with gallstones but only in men with cholecystectomy. Even though the number of female participants was large, the incidence of NAFLD was much lower in women than in men (23.5 per 1000 person-years in women and 68.0 per 1000 person-years in men), resulting in a lack of power to detect an association between cholecystectomy and incident NAFLD in the relatively lean and young female participants.
Though there have been only limited data on the incidence rate of GD among the general population, the incidence of gallstones was lower in our study (3.9 per 1000 person-years in men and 3.7 per 1000 person-years in women) than in other populations [49,50]. This difference could be explained by age and ethnic differences. The frequency of gallstones increases with age, escalating markedly after 40 years of age by 4–10-fold [50], and in our study, 72.9% of the subjects were younger than 40 years. Ethnically, a lower prevalence of GD has been reported for Asian populations compared to Western populations [51]. Regarding gallstone composition, pigment stones still comprise a relatively higher proportion of gallstones in East Asians; however, the epidemiological and composition characteristics of GD have become similar to those seen in Western countries [52]. If pigment stones are included in this study, the resultant association between NAFLD and gallstones may be diluted due to the different pathogenesis of gallstone types.
The mechanisms underlying the bidirectional association between NAFLD and gallstones are incompletely understood. Insulin resistance, a key feature of NAFLD development and progression, could play a major role in the pathogenesis of gallstones by favoring the production of cholesterol-supersaturated bile, inducing a lithogenic bile salt profile and altering gallbladder function, all of which are key features in the pathogenesis of cholesterol gallstones [19,38]. Indeed, the production of bile supersaturated with cholesterol from the liver is a key early metabolic event underlying cholesterol lithogenesis [53]. NAFLD is characterized by disordered lipid metabolism, inhibition of fatty acid oxidation, and enhanced lipogenesis [53]. Therefore, these metabolic milieus in NAFLD may trigger pathophysiologic processes associated with gallstone formation. However, the relationship between insulin resistance and GD may not be unilateral, since gallbladder dysfunction has been associated with NAFLD and other insulin resistance-associated conditions [38,43]. In our study, even after adjustment for HOMA-IR, the bidirectional association between NAFLD and gallstones persisted. Several systemic metabolic changes following cholecystectomy have been linked to the pathophysiology of NAFLD in previous studies [38]. Glucose and lipid metabolism may be affected by alterations in bile acid metabolism in the absence of gall bladder, contributing to development of NAFLD [54]. The altered circulation of bile acids exerts effects on hepatic lipid and glucose metabolism modulated via activity of bile acid receptors such as the farnesoid X receptor and TGR5, leading to gene expression changes in the liver that may lead to development of NAFLD [55,56]. Another possible mechanism is the decreased level of fibrosis growth factor 19 (FGF19), which is mainly secreted by gall bladder mucosa, after cholecystectomy [57]. FGF19 regulates the de novo synthesis of bile salts, lipogenesis, and energy homeostasis [58,59] and has been shown to have inhibitory effects on hepatic fatty acid synthesis [60,61]. Therefore, decreased FGF19 level following cholecystectomy may alter metabolic regulation, favoring triglyceride accumulation in the liver [58,62]. In fact, lower serum level of FGF19 was found to be associated with increased risk of NAFLD [63]. Further prospective studies are warranted to elucidate the mechanisms for an increased risk of NAFLD after cholecystectomy.
In our study, the association between NAFLD and development of gallstone was similarly observed in both men and women, whereas the association between NAFLD and incident cholecystectomy tended to be stronger in women than in men (p for interaction = 0.033). NAFLD, a sexually dimorphic disease, more often affects men, but gallstones are more common in women [64,65]. Similarly, in our study, men were found to be more likely to have NAFLD, while women were more likely to develop gallstones. Previous studies showed that the prevalence of cholecystectomy was generally higher in women, which was also consistent across different ethnic groups [33,66]. The pronounced risk of incident cholecystectomy in women with NAFLD seen in our study might be correlated to a higher likelihood of having symptomatic GD in women, but its mechanism is not clearly understood. Previous studies have reported the stronger association of obesity with the risk of symptomatic GD in women than in men, possibly due to the role of estrogen secreted by adipose tissue [67,68]; estrogen has also been linked to the increased risk of gallstones and cholecystectomy in women [69,70]. Similarly, NAFLD and the effect of estrogen in women might act additively or synergistically in contributing to the development of symptomatic gallstones. However, further studies are needed to fully explain the role of NAFLD in the development of gallstones as well as the role of gallstones or cholecystectomy in the development of NAFLD while considering the existence of different effects by sex.
The study had several limitations. First, NAFLD was diagnosed based on ultrasound results, while liver biopsy is regarded as the gold standard. However, ultrasound is highly accurate for steatosis and is widely used clinically and in population-based studies [71]. Second, the information on the indications for cholecystectomy was not available; thus, we could not differentiate cholecystectomy unrelated to gallstones [35,36]. However, the majority of gallstones are not associated with symptoms [72]; thus, incidental asymptomatic gallstones as a separate outcome in our study could lead to a better understanding of the development of gallstones. Finally, our findings from relatively healthy young and middle-aged Korean men and women may not be generalizable to other populations with different ages or race/ethnicity, or in different settings.
The major strength of our study was that NAFLD and gallstones diagnosed with ultrasound were assessed repeatedly over time along with other confounders, which allowed us to evaluate the temporal association between NAFLD and the development of asymptomatic gallstones. In addition to the large sample size, our study population was relatively young and healthy, and thus our findings may be less likely to be affected by confounding or selection biases due to comorbidities.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this cohort study demonstrated a bidirectional and longitudinal relationship between NAFLD and GD. NAFLD and non-invasive fibrosis markers were independently associated with an increased incidence of gallstones, while gallstones and cholecystectomy were also associated with incident NAFLD. Our findings indicate that the conditions may affect each other, requiring further studies to elucidate the potential mechanisms underlying this association.

Author Contributions

S.R., Y.-H.N. and Y.C. planned and designed the study and developed the study protocol; S.R. and Y.C. analyzed the data; S.R., Y.-H.N., Y.C., B.-S.S., Y.K., E.S., H.-S.J., K.E.Y., Y.K.C., C.-W.K., J.-W.N. and M.-J.K. interpreted the results; Y.C. and S.R. drafted the manuscript; all authors contributed to critical revision of the manuscript; S.R. had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT, & Future Planning (NRF-2017R1A2B2008401).

Acknowledgments

We thank our staff members of Kangbuk Samsung Health Study for their hard work, dedication and continuing support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Appendix A

Table
Table A1. The associations between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and development of gallstones by the presence of obesity, defined as BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2.
Table A1. The associations between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and development of gallstones by the presence of obesity, defined as BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2.
NumberPerson-YearsIncident CaseIncidence Density (1000 Person-Years)Age- and Sex-Adjusted HR a (95% CI)Multivariate HR a (95% CI)
Model 1Model 2
Men
 BMI < 25 kg/m2
  No NAFLD72,546473,899.913332.81.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)
  NAFLD20,146122,294.65604.61.59 (1.44–1.75)1.53 (1.37–1.71)1.38 (1.22–1.56)
 BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2
  No NAFLD20,382131,432.85404.11.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)
  NAFLD35,519217,114.312125.61.37 (1.24–1.52)1.37 (1.22–1.53)1.24 (1.10–1.40)
Women
 BMI < 25 kg/m2
  No NAFLD112,024635,857.619693.11.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)
  NAFLD623032,165.61685.21.70 (1.45–1.99)1.64 (1.37–1.97)1.36 (1.12–1.65)
 BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2
  No NAFLD949454,555.33386.21.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)
  NAFLD710536,106.93208.91.51 (1.30–1.76)1.42 (1.19–1.69)1.38 (1.14–1.66)
a Estimated from parametric proportional hazard models. The p value for the interaction of obesity and NAFLD for the risk of incident gallstones was 0.300 in women, and 0.170 in men. Multivariable adjusted model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, center, year of examination, education level, smoking, alcohol intake, exercise, total calorie intake, history of hypertension, history of diabetes, and medication for dyslipidemia; model 2 included model 1 plus adjustments for LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides, HOMA-IR, and hsCRP. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HR, hazard ratio; hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; HOMA-IR, Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Appendix B

Table
Table A2. The associations between fatty liver index (FLI) and the development of gallstones (n = 194,666).
Table A2. The associations between fatty liver index (FLI) and the development of gallstones (n = 194,666).
NumberPerson-YearsIncident CaseIncidence Density (1000 Person-Year)Age- and Sex-Adjusted HR a (95% CI)Multivariate HR a (95% CI)
Model 1Model 2
Total
  FLI <30142,201686,999.921973.21.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)
  FLI 30–<6034,267173,595.08765.01.70 (1.55–1.85)1.31 (1.17–1.46)1.22 (1.08–1.38)
  FLI ≥6018,19889,353.35726.42.25 (2.03–2.49)1.47 (1.27–1.71)1.29 (1.08–1.54)
  p for trend <0.001<0.0010.002
Men
  FLI <3052,982272,555.57952.91.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)
  FLI 30–<6029,360152,751.17124.71.51 (1.36–1.67)1.29 (1.13–1.48)1.21 (1.05–1.41)
  FLI ≥6016,55682,794.14915.91.98 (1.77–2.21)1.52 (1.27–1.82)1.30 (1.04–1.63)
  p for trend <0.001<0.0010.013
Women
  FLI <3089,219414,444.414023.31.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)
  FLI 30–<60490720,843.91647.82.36 (2.00–2.79)1.38 (1.11–1.71)1.24 (0.98–1.56)
  FLI ≥6016426559.28112.33.83 (3.05–4.81)1.46 (1.05–2.04)1.31 (0.91–1.89)
  p for trend <0.0010.0040.074
a estimated from parametric proportional hazard model. The p-value for the interaction of sex and FLI on the risk of incident gallstone was 0.503. Multivariable adjusted model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, BMI, center, year of examination, education level, smoking, alcohol intake, exercise, total calorie intake, history of hypertension, history of diabetes and medication for dyslipidemia, except sex in the stratified analysis by sex; model 2: model 1 plus adjusted for LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides, HOMA-IR, or hsCRP. Abbreviations: CI, confidence intervals; FLI, fatty liver index; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; HR, hazard ratios; hsCRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Appendix C

Table
Table A3. The associations between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and the development of gallstones or cholecystectomy (n = 283,446).
Table A3. The associations between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and the development of gallstones or cholecystectomy (n = 283,446).
NumberPerson-YearsIncident CaseIncidence Density (1000 Person-Year)Age- and Sex-Adjusted HR a (95% CI)Multivariate HR a (95% CI)
Model 1Model 2
Gallstone or cholecystecomty
Total
No NAFLD214,4461,299,654.649273.81.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)
NAFLD69,000409,552.026126.41.73 (1.64–1.82)1.28 (1.20–1.37)1.24 (1.16–1.33)
Men
No NAFLD92,928607,142.622073.61.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)
NAFLD55,665340,888.920366.01.63 (1.53–1.73)1.29 (1.20–1.39)1.23 (1.14–1.34)
Women
No NAFLD121,518692,512.027203.91.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)
NAFLD13,33568,663.15768.42.11 (1.93–2.32)1.33 (1.18–1.50)1.28 (1.13–1.45)
Cholecystectomy
Total
No NAFLD214,4461,311,709.611500.91.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)
NAFLD69,000415,994.85561.31.56 (1.40–1.74)1.10 (0.96–1.26)1.10 (0.95–1.27)
Men
No NAFLD92,928613,204.55430.91.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)
NAFLD55,665346,147.14241.21.40 (1.24–1.59)1.06 (0.90–1.25)1.04 (0.88–1.24)
Women
No NAFLD121,518698,505.06070.91.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)
NAFLD13,33569,847.71321.92.03 (1.67–2.47)1.30 (1.01–1.68)1.26 (0.96–1.64)
a Estimated from parametric proportional hazard model. Multivariable adjusted model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, BMI, center, year of examination, education level, smoking, alcohol intake, exercise, total calorie intake, history of hypertension, history of diabetes, and medication for dyslipidemia, except sex in the stratified analysis by sex; model 2: model 1 plus adjusted for LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides, HOMA-IR, or hsCRP. Abbreviations: CI, confidence intervals; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; HR, hazard ratios; hsCRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. The p-value for the interaction of sex and NAFLD on the risk of incident gallstone disease (gallstone or cholecystectomy) was 0.511. The p-value for the interaction of sex and NAFLD on the risk of incident cholecystectomy was 0.033.

Appendix D

Table
Table A4. The factors associated with NAFLD and GD at baseline before prospective longitudinal analysis from which persons with NAFLD or GD at baseline were excluded.
Table A4. The factors associated with NAFLD and GD at baseline before prospective longitudinal analysis from which persons with NAFLD or GD at baseline were excluded.
Multivariable-Adjusted Odds Ratios (95% CI) for NAFLDMultivariable-Adjusted Odds Ratios (95% CI) for GD
Age per 10-year increment1.16 (1.14–1.19)1.71 (1.65–1.76)
Male2.49 (2.40–2.59)0.61 (0.56–0.66)
Suwon center1.38 (1.34–1.41)1.04 (0.98–1.11)
year of screening exam per 1-year1.06 (1.05–1.06)1.04 (1.03–1.05)
Education level ≥ college graduate1.15 (1.11–1.19)1.31 (1.22–1.42)
Alcohol intake
 <10 g of ethanol per day0.88 (0.85–0.91)0.95 (0.89–1.02)
 ≥10 g of ethanol per day0.72 (0.69–0.75)0.86 (0.79–0.94)
Smoking
 Ever smoker1.01 (0.97–1.05)1.08 (0.99–1.19)
 Never smoker0.93 (0.89–0.96)1.13 (1.04–1.24)
Vigorous exercise ≥ 3 times per week0.82 (0.79–0.85)0.99 (0.91–1.07)
History of hypertension1.10 (1.05–1.16)0.96 (0.86–1.06)
History of diabetes1.82 (1.65–2.02)1.01 (0.85–1.20)
Medication for dyslipidemia1.62 (1.44–1.83)0.89 (0.72–1.10)
BMI per 1 SD increment2.74 (2.69–2.79)1.23 (1.19–1.27)
LDL-C per 1 SD increment1.33 (1.32–1.35)0.96 (0.93–0.99)
HDL-C per 1 SD increment0.73 (0.72–0.74)0.93 (0.90–0.96)
TC per 1 SD increment1.59 (1.57–1.62)0.93 (0.89–0.96)
HOMA-IR per 1 SD increment1.71 (1.68–1.74)1.15 (1.11–1.18)
hsCRP per 1 SD increment1.30 (1.28–1.31)1.14 (1.11–1.18)
Estimated from logistic regression models. Multivariate models are adjusted for all other variables listed for the model.

References

  1. Chalasani, N.; Younossi, Z.; Lavine, J.E.; Diehl, A.M.; Brunt, E.M.; Cusi, K.; Charlton, M.; Sanyal, A.J. The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice guideline by the American gastroenterological association, American association for the study of liver diseases, and American college of gastroenterology. Gastroenterology 2012, 142, 1592–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Neuschwander-Tetri, B.A.; Caldwell, S.H. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: Summary of an AASLD single topic conference. Hepatology 2003, 37, 1202–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Nascimbeni, F.; Ballestri, S.; Machado, M.V.; Mantovani, A.; Cortez-Pinto, H.; Targher, G.; Lonardo, A. Clinical relevance of liver histopathology and different histological classifications of NASH in adults. Expert. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018, 12, 351–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Younossi, Z.; Henry, L. Contribution of alcoholic and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease to the burden of liver-related morbidity and mortality. Gastroenterology 2016, 150, 1778–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Anstee, Q.M.; Targher, G.; Day, C.P. Progression of NAFLD to diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease or cirrhosis. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013, 10, 330–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ballestri, S.; Nascimbeni, F.; Romagnoli, D.; Lonardo, A. The independent predictors of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and its individual histological features: Insulin resistance, serum uric acid, metabolic syndrome, alanine aminotransferase and serum total cholesterol are a clue to pathogenesis and candidate targets for treatment. Hepatol. Res. 2016, 46, 1074–1087. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Ballestri, S.; Zona, S.; Targher, G.; Romagnoli, D.; Baldelli, E.; Nascimbeni, F.; Roverato, A.; Guaraldi, G.; Lonardo, A. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with an almost twofold increased risk of incident type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome. Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016, 31, 936–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Italian Association for the Study of the Liver. AISF position paper on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): Updates and future directions. Dig. Liver Dis. 2017, 49, 471–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lonardo, A.; Nascimbeni, F.; Mantovani, A.; Targher, G. Hypertension, diabetes, atherosclerosis and NASH: Cause or consequence? J. Hepatol. 2018, 68, 335–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Vanni, E.; Bugianesi, E.; Kotronen, A.; De Minicis, S.; Yki-Jarvinen, H.; Svegliati-Baroni, G. From the metabolic syndrome to NAFLD or vice versa? Dig. Liver Dis. 2010, 42, 320–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Yki-Jarvinen, H. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease as a cause and a consequence of metabolic syndrome. Lancet. Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014, 2, 901–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Di Ciaula, A.; Wang, D.Q.; Portincasa, P. An update on the pathogenesis of cholesterol gallstone disease. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 2018, 34, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Loria, P.; Lonardo, A.; Lombardini, S.; Carulli, L.; Verrone, A.; Ganazzi, D.; Rudilosso, A.; D’Amico, R.; Bertolotti, M.; Carulli, N. Gallstone disease in non-alcoholic fatty liver: Prevalence and associated factors. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2005, 20, 1176–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ramos-De la Medina, A.; Remes-Troche, J.M.; Roesch-Dietlen, F.B.; Perez-Morales, A.G.; Martinez, S.; Cid-Juarez, S. Routine liver biopsy to screen for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) during cholecystectomy for gallstone disease: Is it justified? J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2008, 12, 2097–2102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Shen, S.S.; Gong, J.J.; Wang, X.W.; Chen, L.; Qin, S.; Huang, L.F.; Chen, Y.Q.; Ren, H.; Yang, Q.B.; Hu, H.D. Promotional effect of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease on Gallstone disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Turk. J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 28, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Jaruvongvanich, V.; Sanguankeo, A.; Upala, S. Significant association between gallstone disease and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2016, 61, 2389–2396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Marchesini, G.; Bugianesi, E.; Forlani, G.; Cerrelli, F.; Lenzi, M.; Manini, R.; Natale, S.; Vanni, E.; Villanova, N.; Melchionda, N.; et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver, steatohepatitis, and the metabolic syndrome. Hepatology 2003, 37, 917–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Nervi, F.; Arrese, M. Cholecystectomy and NAFLD: Does gallbladder removal have metabolic consequences? Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2013, 108, 959–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Biddinger, S.B.; Haas, J.T.; Yu, B.B.; Bezy, O.; Jing, E.; Zhang, W.; Unterman, T.G.; Carey, M.C.; Kahn, C.R. Hepatic insulin resistance directly promotes formation of cholesterol gallstones. Nat. Med. 2008, 14, 778–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Ahmed, M.H.; Ali, A. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and cholesterol gallstones: Which comes first? Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 49, 521–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ryan, M.C.; Wilson, A.M.; Slavin, J.; Best, J.D.; Jenkins, A.J.; Desmond, P.V. Associations between liver histology and severity of the metabolic syndrome in subjects with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Diabetes Care 2005, 28, 1222–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chen, J.Y.; Hsu, C.T.; Liu, J.H.; Tung, T.H. Clinical predictors of incident gallstone disease in a Chinese population in Taipei, Taiwan. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014, 14, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Liu, J.; Lin, H.; Zhang, C.; Wang, L.; Wu, S.; Zhang, D.; Tang, F.; Xue, F.; Liu, Y. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease associated with gallstones in females rather than males: A longitudinal cohort study in Chinese urban population. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014, 14, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Housset, C.; Chretien, Y.; Debray, D.; Chignard, N. Functions of the gallbladder. Compr. Physiol. 2016, 6, 1549–1577. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Chang, Y.; Jung, H.S.; Cho, J.; Zhang, Y.; Yun, K.E.; Lazo, M.; Pastor-Barriuso, R.; Ahn, J.; Kim, C.W.; Rampal, S.; et al. Metabolically Healthy obesity and the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 111, 1133–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Chang, Y.; Cho, Y.K.; Kim, Y.; Sung, E.; Ahn, J.; Jung, H.S.; Yun, K.E.; Shin, H.; Ryu, S. Non-heavy drinking and worsening of non-invasive fibrosis markers in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A cohort study. Hepatology 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Western Pacific. The Asia-Pacific Perspective: Redefining Obesity and Its Treatment; Health Communications Australia Pty Limited: Sydney, Australia, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  28. Angulo, P.; Hui, J.M.; Marchesini, G.; Bugianesi, E.; George, J.; Farrell, G.C.; Enders, F.; Saksena, S.; Burt, A.D.; Bida, J.P.; et al. The NAFLD fibrosis score: A noninvasive system that identifies liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. Hepatology 2007, 45, 846–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. McPherson, S.; Stewart, S.F.; Henderson, E.; Bugianesi, E.; George, J.; Farrell, G.C.; Enders, F.; Saksena, S.; Burt, A.D.; Bida, J.P.; et al. Simple non-invasive fibrosis scoring systems can reliably exclude advanced fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Gut 2010, 59, 1265–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Shah, A.G.; Lydecker, A.; Murray, K.; Tetri, B.N.; Contos, M.J.; Sanyal, A.J. Comparison of noninvasive markers of fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2009, 7, 1104–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Wai, C.T.; Greenson, J.K.; Fontana, R.J.; Kalbfleisch, J.D.; Marrero, J.A.; Conjeevaram, H.S.; Lok, A.S. A simple noninvasive index can predict both significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 2003, 38, 518–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Mathiesen, U.L.; Franzen, L.E.; Aselius, H.; Resjo, M.; Jacobsson, L.; Foberg, U.; Fryden, A.; Bodemar, G. Increased liver echogenicity at ultrasound examination reflects degree of steatosis but not of fibrosis in asymptomatic patients with mild/moderate abnormalities of liver transaminases. Dig. Liver Dis. 2002, 34, 516–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Everhart, J.E.; Khare, M.; Hill, M.; Maurer, K.R. Prevalence and ethnic differences in gallbladder disease in the United States. Gastroenterology 1999, 117, 632–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Royston, P.; Parmar, M.K. Flexible parametric proportional-hazards and proportional-odds models for censored survival data, with application to prognostic modelling and estimation of treatment effects. Stat. Med. 2002, 21, 2175–2197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ahmed, M.; Diggory, R. Acalculous gallbladder disease: The outcomes of treatment by laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2011, 93, 209–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Schwesinger, W.H.; Diehl, A.K. Changing indications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Stones without symptoms and symptoms without stones. Surg. Clin. North Am. 1996, 76, 493–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bedogni, G.; Bellentani, S.; Miglioli, L.; Masutti, F.; Passalacqua, M.; Castiglione, A.; Tiribelli, C. The fatty liver index: A simple and accurate predictor of hepatic steatosis in the general population. BMC Gastroenterol. 2006, 6, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Arrese, M.; Cortes, V.; Barrera, F.; Nervi, F. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, cholesterol gallstones, and cholecystectomy: New insights on a complex relationship. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 2018, 34, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Lee, Y.C.; Wu, J.S.; Yang, Y.C.; Chang, C.S.; Lu, F.H.; Chang, C.J. Moderate to severe, but not mild, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease associated with increased risk of gallstone disease. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 49, 1001–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Qiao, Q.H.; Zhu, W.H.; Yu, Y.X.; Huang, F.F.; Chen, L.Y. Nonalcoholic fatty liver was associated with asymptomatic gallstones in a Chinese population. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017, 96, e7853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Fracanzani, A.L.; Valenti, L.; Russello, M.; Miele, L.; Bertelli, C.; Bellia, A.; Masetti, C.; Cefalo, C.; Grieco, A.; Marchesini, G.; et al. Gallstone disease is associated with more severe liver damage in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e41183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Qin, J.-J.; Ding, W.-J. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and its relevant factors increased the risk of gallstone disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2016, 9, 3009–3016. [Google Scholar]
  43. Cortes, V.; Quezada, N.; Uribe, S.; Arrese, M.; Nervi, F. Effect of cholecystectomy on hepatic fat accumulation and insulin resistance in non-obese Hispanic patients: A pilot study. Lipids Health Dis. 2017, 16, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Seppala-Lindroos, A.; Vehkavaara, S.; Hakkinen, A.M.; Goto, T.; Westerbacka, J.; Sovijarvi, A.; Halavaara, J.; Yki-Jarvinen, H. Fat accumulation in the liver is associated with defects in insulin suppression of glucose production and serum free fatty acids independent of obesity in normal men. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 87, 3023–3028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Feldman, A.; Eder, S.K.; Felder, T.K.; Kedenko, L.; Paulweber, B.; Stadlmayr, A.; Huber-Schonauer, U.; Niederseer, D.; Stickel, F.; Auer, S.; et al. Clinical and metabolic characterization of lean Caucasian subjects with non-alcoholic fatty liver. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 112, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Chen, L.Y.; Qiao, Q.H.; Zhang, S.C.; Chen, Y.H.; Chao, G.Q.; Fang, L.Z. Metabolic syndrome and gallstone disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 2012, 18, 4215–4220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Simonen, P.; Kotronen, A.; Hallikainen, M.; Sevastianova, K.; Makkonen, J.; Hakkarainen, A.; Lundbom, N.; Miettinen, T.A.; Gylling, H.; Yki-Jarvinen, H. Cholesterol synthesis is increased and absorption decreased in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease independent of obesity. J. Hepatol. 2011, 54, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Min, H.K.; Kapoor, A.; Fuchs, M.; Mirshahi, F.; Zhou, H.; Maher, J.; Kellum, J.; Warnick, R.; Contos, M.J.; Sanyal, A.J. Increased hepatic synthesis and dysregulation of cholesterol metabolism is associated with the severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Cell Metab. 2012, 15, 665–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Halldestam, I.; Kullman, E.; Borch, K. Incidence of and potential risk factors for gallstone disease in a general population sample. Br. J. Surg. 2009, 96, 1315–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Shaffer, E.A. Epidemiology and risk factors for gallstone disease: Has the paradigm changed in the 21st century? Curr. Gastroenterol. Rep. 2005, 7, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Shaffer, E.A. Gallstone disease: Epidemiology of gallbladder stone disease. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2006, 20, 981–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Kim, M.H.; Lim, B.C.; Myung, S.J.; Lee, S.K.; Ohrr, H.C.; Kim, Y.T.; Roe, I.H.; Kim, J.H.; Chung, J.B.; Kim, C.D.; et al. Epidemiological study on Korean gallstone disease: A nationwide cooperative study. Dig. Dis. Sci. 1999, 44, 1674–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Musso, G.; Gambino, R.; Cassader, M. Recent insights into hepatic lipid metabolism in non–alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Prog. Lipid Res. 2009, 48, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Almond, H.R.; Vlahcevic, Z.R.; Bell, C.C.Jr.; Gregory, D.H.; Swell, L. Bile acid pools, kinetics and biliary lipid composition before and after cholecystectomy. N. Engl. J. Med. 1973, 289, 1213–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Trauner, M.; Claudel, T.; Fickert, P.; Moustafa, T.; Wagner, M. Bile acids as regulators of hepatic lipid and glucose metabolism. Dig. Dis. 2010, 28, 220–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wagner, M.; Zollner, G.; Trauner, M. Nuclear receptors in liver disease. Hepatology 2011, 53, 1023–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Barrera, F.; Azocar, L.; Molina, H.; Schalper, K.A.; Ocares, M.; Liberona, J.; Villarroel, L.; Pimentel, F.; Perez-Ayuso, R.M.; Nervi, F.; et al. Effect of cholecystectomy on bile acid synthesis and circulating levels of fibroblast growth factor 19. Ann. Hepatol. 2015, 14, 710–721. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  58. Ruhl, C.E.; Everhart, J.E. Relationship of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with cholecystectomy in the US population. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2013, 108, 952–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Zweers, S.J.; Booij, K.A.; Komuta, M.; Roskams, T.; Gouma, D.J.; Jansen, P.L.; Schaap, F.G. The human gallbladder secretes fibroblast growth factor 19 into bile: Towards defining the role of fibroblast growth factor 19 in the enterobiliary tract. Hepatology 2012, 55, 575–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Bhatnagar, S.; Damron, H.A.; Hillgartner, F.B. Fibroblast growth factor-19, a novel factor that inhibits hepatic fatty acid synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 10023–10033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Fu, L.; John, L.M.; Adams, S.H.; Yu, X.X.; Tomlinson, E.; Renz, M.; Williams, P.M.; Soriano, R.; Corpuz, R.; Moffat, B.; et al. Fibroblast growth factor 19 increases metabolic rate and reverses dietary and leptin-deficient diabetes. Endocrinology 2004, 145, 2594–2603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Kullak-Ublick, G.A.; Paumgartner, G.; Berr, F. Long-term effects of cholecystectomy on bile acid metabolism. Hepatology 1995, 21, 41–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Alisi, A.; Ceccarelli, S.; Panera, N.; Prono, F.; Petrini, S.; De Stefanis, C.; Pezzullo, M.; Tozzi, A.; Villani, A.; Bedogni, G.; et al. Association between serum atypical fibroblast growth factors 21 and 19 and pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e67160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Ballestri, S.; Nascimbeni, F.; Baldelli, E.; Marrazzo, A.; Romagnoli, D.; Lonardo, A. NAFLD as a sexual dimorphic disease: Role of gender and reproductive status in the development and progression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and inherent cardiovascular risk. Adv. Ther. 2017, 34, 1291–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Lammert, F.; Gurusamy, K.; Ko, C.W.; Miquel, J.F.; Mendez-Sanchez, N.; Portincasa, P.; van Erpecum, K.J.; van Laarhoven, C.J.; Wang, D.Q. Gallstones. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2016, 2, 16024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Huang, J.; Chang, C.H.; Wang, J.L.; Kuo, H.K.; Lin, J.W.; Shau, W.Y.; Lee, P.H. Nationwide epidemiological study of severe gallstone disease in Taiwan. BMC Gastroenterol. 2009, 9, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Key, T.J.; Appleby, P.N.; Reeves, G.K.; Roddam, A.; Dorgan, J.F.; Longcope, C.; Stanczyk, F.Z.; Stephenson, H.E.Jr.; Falk, R.T.; Miller, R.; et al. Body mass index, serum sex hormones, and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2003, 95, 1218–1226. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  68. Stender, S.; Nordestgaard, B.G.; Tybjaerg-Hansen, A. Elevated body mass index as a causal risk factor for symptomatic gallstone disease: A mendelian randomization study. Hepatology 2013, 58, 2133–2141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Cirillo, D.J.; Wallace, R.B.; Rodabough, R.J.; Greenland, P.; LaCroix, A.Z.; Limacher, M.C.; Larson, J.C. Effect of estrogen therapy on gallbladder disease. JAMA 2005, 293, 330–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Mamdani, M.M.; Tu, K.; van Walraven, C.; Austin, P.C.; Naylor, C.D. Postmenopausal estrogen replacement therapy and increased rates of cholecystectomy and appendectomy. CMAJ 2000, 162, 1421–1424. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  71. Clark, J.M.; Diehl, A.M. Defining nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Implications for epidemiologic studies. Gastroenterology 2003, 124, 248–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Portincasa, P.; Moschetta, A.; Palasciano, G. Cholesterol gallstone disease. Lancet 2006, 368, 230–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jcm 07 00458 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow diagram for the selection of study subjects.
Figure 1. Flow diagram for the selection of study subjects.
Jcm 07 00458 g001
Table
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of study participants according to incident gallstones by sex (n = 283,446).
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of study participants according to incident gallstones by sex (n = 283,446).
CharacteristicMen (n = 148,593)p ValueWomen (n = 134,853)p Value
No Incident GallstonesIncident GallstonesNo Incident GallstonesIncident Gallstones
Number144,9483645 132,0582795
Age (years) a37.0 (7.8)37.9 (8.3)<0.00136.9 (8.3)36.8 (7.7)0.260
Current smoker (%)38.040.40.0042.22.50.303
Alcohol intake (%) b45.140.5<0.0017.46.00.007
Vigorous exercise (%) c15.012.8<0.00112.711.80.141
Higher education (%) d86.885.90.21072.571.10.141
Fatty liver (%)37.248.6<0.0019.717.5<0.001
Diabetes mellitus (%)3.04.0<0.0011.42.00.008
Hypertension (%)15.219.0<0.0015.67.5<0.001
Medication for dyslipidemia (%)1.21.30.4900.90.70.303
Obesity (%)37.448.1<0.00112.123.5<0.001
BMI (kg/m2)24.3 (2.9)25.1 (3.0)<0.00121.7 (2.9)22.8 (3.6)<0.001
Systolic BP (mmHg) a115.9 (12.2)117.3 (12.4)<0.001105.3 (12.8)107.8 (14.0)<0.001
Diastolic BP (mmHg) a74.9 (9.3)76.4 (9.4)<0.00167.1 (9.0)68.7 (9.7)<0.001
Glucose (mg/dL) a95.2 (14.7)96.4 (16.9)<0.00190.9 (11.5)92.4 (13.7)<0.001
Total cholesterol (mg/ dL) a197.8 (34.2)201.7 (36.0)<0.001185.8 (32.8)187.3 (34.2)0.022
LDL-C (mg/ dL) a121.5 (30.2)123.0 (30.8)0.002106.1 (28.5)108.0 (29.5)<0.001
HDL-C (mg/ dL) a52.2 (11.5)49.9 (10.7)<0.00163.0 (14.1)59.4 (13.4)<0.001
Triglycerides (mg/ dL) e116 (82–166)129 (93–186)<0.00173 (56–100)82 (60–116)<0.001
Albumin (g/dL) a4.7 (0.2)4.6 (0.2)<0.0014.5 (0.2)4.5 (0.2)0.342
AST (U/L) e23 (19–28)24 (20–29)<0.00118 (16–22)19 (16–22)<0.001
ALT (U/L) e24 (18–35)28 (20–41)<0.00114 (11–18)15 (12–20)<0.001
GGT (U/L) e26 (18–41)31 (20–48)<0.00112 (9–16)13 (10–19)<0.001
hsCRP (mg/L) e0.5 (0.3–1.0)0.7 (0.4–1.3)<0.0010.3 (0.1–0.7)0.4 (0.2–1.0)<0.001
HOMA-IR e1.6 (1.1–2.2)1.9 (1.3–2.5)<0.0011.4 (0.9–2.0)1.7 (1.2–2.3)<0.001
Data are a mean (standard deviation); e median (interquartile range), or percentage; b ≥ 10 g of ethanol per day; c ≥ 3 times per week; d ≥ college graduate; Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; GGT, gamma-glutamyltransferase; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; hsCRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Table
Table 2. The associations between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and the development of gallstones.
Table 2. The associations between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and the development of gallstones.
NumberPerson-YearsIncident CaseIncidence Density (1000 Person-Year)Age- and Sex-Adjusted HR a (95% CI)Multivariate HR a (95% CI)
Model 1Model 2
Total (n = 283,446)
No NAFLD214,4461,295,745.641803.21.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)
NAFLD69,000407,681.422605.51.77 (1.68–1.87)1.31 (1.22–1.40)1.26 (1.17–1.35)
Men (n = 148,593)
No NAFLD121,518605,332.723073.11.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)
NAFLD13,335339,409.04885.21.67 (1.57–1.79)1.32 (1.22–1.43)1.26 (1.15–1.37)
Women (n = 134,853)
No. NAFLD92,928690,412.918733.31.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)
NAFLD55,66568,272.517727.12.17 (1.96–2.41)1.35 (1.18–1.53)1.28 (1.11–1.46)
a Estimated from parametric proportional hazard models. The p value for the interaction of sex and NAFLD on the risk of incident gallstones was 0.740. Multivariable adjusted model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, BMI, center, year of examination, education level, smoking, alcohol intake, exercise, total calorie intake, history of hypertension, history of diabetes and medication for dyslipidemia, except sex in the stratified analysis by sex; model 2: model 1 plus adjusted for LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides, HOMA-IR, or hsCRP. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence intervals; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; HR, hazard ratios; hsCRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Table
Table 3. The associations between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and its severity based on non-invasive fibrosis markers and the development of gallstones.
Table 3. The associations between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and its severity based on non-invasive fibrosis markers and the development of gallstones.
NumberPerson-YearsIncident CaseIncidence Density (1000 Person-Year)Age- and sex-Adjusted HR a (95% CI)Multivariate HR a (95% CI)
Model 1Model 2
Based on NFS
  No NAFLD214,4461,295,745.641803.21.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)
  NAFLD, Low NFS63,985384,074.420565.41.73 (1.64–1.83)1.30 (1.21–1.39)1.25 (1.16–1.34)
  NAFLD, Intermediate or high NFS501523,607.02048.62.40 (2.07–2.78)1.54 (1.30–1.82)1.50 (1.26–1.78)
  p for trend <0.001<0.001<0.001
Based on FIB 4
  No NAFLD214,4461,295,745.641803.21.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)
  NAFLD, Low FIB 465,526392,234.621575.51.77 (1.68–1.88)1.31 (1.23–1.41)1.26 (1.17–1.36)
  NAFLD, Intermediate or high FIB 4347415,446.81036.71.68 (1.37–2.06)1.20 (0.95–1.51)1.21 (0.96–1.53)
  p for trend <0.001<0.001<0.001
Based on APRI
  No NAFLD214,4461,295,745.641803.21.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)
  NAFLD, Low APRI64,537381,044.821015.51.76 (1.67–1.86)1.31 (1.22–1.40)1.26 (1.17–1.36)
  NAFLD, Intermediate or high APRI446326,636.61596.01.89 (1.61–2.22)1.31 (1.10–1.57)1.26 (1.05–1.50)
  p for trend <0.001<0.001<0.001
a Estimated from parametric proportional hazard models. Multivariable adjusted model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, BMI, center, year of examination, education level, smoking, alcohol intake, exercise, total calorie intake, history of hypertension, history of diabetes and medication for dyslipidemia; model 2: model 1 plus adjusted for LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides, HOMA-IR, or hsCRP. Abbreviations: APRI, aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index; CI, confidence intervals; FIB-4, fibrosis 4; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; HR, hazard ratios; hsCRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; NFS, NAFLD fibrosis score.
Table
Table 4. The associations between gallstone, cholecystectomy and the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (n = 219,641).
Table 4. The associations between gallstone, cholecystectomy and the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (n = 219,641).
NumberPerson-YearsIncident CaseIncidence Density (1000 Person-Year)Age- And Sex-Adjusted HR a (95% CI)Multivariate HR a (95% CI)
Model 1Model 2
Total (n = 219,641)
  No gallstone disease214,4461,141,715.847,99242.01.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)
  Gallstone407319,015.1105155.31.36 (1.28–1.44)1.16 (1.09–1.24)1.14 (1.07–1.22)
  Cholecystectomy11224723.825854.61.23 (1.09–1.39)1.10 (0.97–1.25)1.17 (1.03–1.33)
Men (n = 94,865)
  No gallstone disease92,928484,621.632,78267.61.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)
  Gallstone14946653.357085.71.26 (1.16–1.37)1.12 (1.03–1.22)1.10 (1.01–1.20)
  Cholecystectomy4431763.415487.31.29 (1.10–1.51)1.21 (1.04–1.42)1.29 (1.10–1.52)
Women (n = 124,776)
  No gallstone disease121,518657,094.215,21023.11.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)
  Gallstone257912,361.848138.91.53 (1.40–1.68)1.23 (1.13–1.35)1.15 (1.05–1.27)
  Cholecystectomy6792960.510435.11.17 (0.96–1.42)0.98 (0.80–1.19)1.05 (0.86–1.28)
a Estimated from parametric proportional hazard models. The p-value for the interaction of sex and gallstone disease on the risk of incident NAFLD was 0.002. Multivariable adjusted model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, BMI, center, year of examination, education level, smoking, alcohol intake, exercise, total calorie intake, history of hypertension, history of diabetes, and medication for dyslipidemia, except sex in the stratified analysis by sex; model 2: model 1 plus adjustment for LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides, HOMA-IR, or hsCRP. Abbreviations: CI, confidence intervals; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; HR, hazard ratios; hsCRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chang, Y.; Noh, Y.-H.; Suh, B.-S.; Kim, Y.; Sung, E.; Jung, H.-S.; Kim, C.-W.; Kwon, M.-J.; Yun, K.E.; Noh, J.-W.; et al. Bidirectional Association between Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Gallstone Disease: A Cohort Study. J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7, 458. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7110458

AMA Style

Chang Y, Noh Y-H, Suh B-S, Kim Y, Sung E, Jung H-S, Kim C-W, Kwon M-J, Yun KE, Noh J-W, et al. Bidirectional Association between Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Gallstone Disease: A Cohort Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2018; 7(11):458. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7110458

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chang, Yoosoo, Yoo-Hun Noh, Byung-Seong Suh, Yejin Kim, Eunju Sung, Hyun-Suk Jung, Chan-Won Kim, Min-Jung Kwon, Kyung Eun Yun, Jin-Won Noh, and et al. 2018. "Bidirectional Association between Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Gallstone Disease: A Cohort Study" Journal of Clinical Medicine 7, no. 11: 458. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7110458

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop