Next Article in Journal
The Burden of Worry: Fear of Cancer Recurrence Across Bladder Cancer Survivorship Phases—A Cross-Sectional Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Combined Fixed and Dynamic Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Due to a Coexisting Subaortic Membrane: A Case Report
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Predictive and Prognostic Biomarkers in Pediatric Intussusception—A Systematic Review

by
Kristina Jurković
1,†,
Karla Pehar
1,†,
Danijela Jurić
1 and
Marko Bašković
1,2,3,4,5,*
1
School of Medicine, Catholic University of Croatia, Ilica 242, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
2
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children’s Hospital Zagreb, Ulica Vjekoslava Klaića 16, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
3
School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Šalata 3, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
4
Scientific Centre of Excellence for Reproductive and Regenerative Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Šalata 3, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
5
Croatian Academy of Medical Sciences, Kaptol 15, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(8), 3114; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15083114
Submission received: 14 March 2026 / Revised: 3 April 2026 / Accepted: 16 April 2026 / Published: 19 April 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Pediatrics)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Pediatric intussusception, a condition where part of the intestine telescopes into an adjacent segment, predominantly affects children aged 6–18 months. Prompt diagnosis and management are crucial to prevent serious complications such as ischemia or necrosis. This systematic review aims to comprehensively evaluate and synthesize existing research on predictive and prognostic biomarkers associated with pediatric intussusception that can aid in early diagnosis, severity assessment, outcome prediction, and treatment. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science using specific MeSH and free-text terms related to intussusception, biomarkers, and the pediatric population. The review followed PRISMA guidelines, with independent screening, data extraction, and quality assessment using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. A total of 47 studies, mostly retrospective cohorts from diverse countries, with over 20,000 patients, were included. Results: The studies identified numerous biomarkers associated with disease severity, including hematological markers and indices (e.g., WBC counts and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio), inflammatory markers (CRP and cytokines), biochemical markers (serum lactate, D-dimer, and electrolytes), and novel molecular markers (I-FABP, MCP-1, and transfer RNA fragments). Elevated inflammatory markers and derived ratios consistently predicted bowel necrosis, ischemia, and need for surgery. Biochemical markers like serum lactate and D-dimer correlated with ischemic severity. Emerging molecular biomarkers show promise for early, non-invasive risk stratification. However, heterogeneity in study designs, assay methods, and cutoff values currently limits immediate clinical application. Conclusions: Biomarker research offers valuable tools for improving pediatric intussusception management, with the potential to enhance early diagnosis and outcome prediction. While traditional markers are useful, novel molecular and protein biomarkers hold promise for more specific and rapid assessment. Validation through multicenter, prospective studies and standardized protocols is essential before routine implementation. Integrating biomarkers with clinical and imaging data could refine decision-making, ultimately reducing morbidity and improving prognosis in affected children.

1. Introduction

Intussusception in children is a condition where part of the intestine telescopes into an adjacent segment. It most commonly affects children aged 6 to 18 months and is more frequent in males [1]. Symptoms include episodic abdominal pain that waxes and wanes, vomiting, abdominal bloating, and bloody stool [2]. The causes of intussusception in children are largely unknown, with approximately 90% of cases arising from an idiopathic origin. When causes are identified, they may include infections such as viral gastroenteritis, anatomical factors like Meckel’s diverticulum or intestinal tumors, lymphoid hyperplasia, and altered intestinal motility [3,4]. Diagnosis is primarily achieved through ultrasound imaging [5]. Intussusception is not usually immediately life-threatening and is often successfully treated with non-surgical methods. The most common approach involves the use of barium, water-soluble contrast, or air-contrast enemas, which serve both to confirm the diagnosis and to reduce the intussusception. The success rate of enema reduction exceeds 80%. However, there is a possibility of recurrence, with up to 10% of cases reoccurring within 24 h after initial treatment [3,6,7]. The longer the prolapsed intestinal segment remains reduced and the longer it goes without an adequate blood supply, the less effective the non-surgical reduction becomes. In cases where non-surgical reduction fails or is not feasible, surgical intervention becomes necessary. If attempts at manual reduction are unsuccessful, the affected section of the intestine may need to be surgically removed. Additionally, a laparoscopic approach can be employed, where the surgeon uses forceps to gently pull apart the intestinal segments and restore normal anatomy [8,9,10]. Prompt diagnosis and treatment are crucial to prevent complications such as bowel ischemia or perforation. Overall, with timely intervention, the prognosis for children with intussusception is excellent [1,2,11]. Overall, intussusception remains a significant pediatric emergency but is highly treatable with prompt diagnosis and management.
Biomarkers are measurable indicators of biological processes, pathological conditions, or responses to therapeutic interventions, playing a crucial role in disease diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring. They can include molecules such as proteins, nucleic acids, or metabolites that are detected in blood, tissues, or other bodily fluids [12]. Biomarkers for intestinal conditions in children are vital for early diagnosis, guiding treatment decisions, and monitoring disease activity. In inflammatory disorders such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), fecal calprotectin and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) serve as reliable indicators of intestinal inflammation and mucosal injury [13]. Markers of intestinal permeability, like zonulin, provide insights into mucosal barrier integrity, which can be compromised in various gastrointestinal conditions [14]. Beyond inflammatory diseases, biomarkers are also being explored for surgical pathologies such as intussusception, volvulus, and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) [15,16,17]. For example, elevated inflammatory cytokines, specific imaging biomarkers, and laboratory parameters can assist in early detection and assessment of severity, potentially guiding surgical interventions. Additionally, emerging markers such as microRNAs and metabolomic profiles show promise in diagnosing and differentiating among conditions like congenital malformations, infectious enterocolitis, and short bowel syndrome [18,19]. Advancements in biomarker research are enhancing the ability to diagnose, stratify, and personalize treatment for a broad spectrum of pediatric intestinal diseases, ultimately improving clinical outcomes.
This systematic review aims to comprehensively evaluate and synthesize existing research on predictive and prognostic biomarkers associated with pediatric intussusception. The review seeks to identify biomarkers that can aid in early diagnosis, stratify disease severity, predict disease outcomes, and guide therapeutic decision-making to improve patient management and prognosis in affected children.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Search Strategy

A systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, CRD420251268322). The PRISMA 2020 Checklist is included in the Supplementary Materials [20].
To identify the total number of articles of interest, we searched the electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science on 01 January 2026. Reading the articles and processing the data took one month. The search combinations used included the Boolean operators “AND” and “OR” in combination with the following MeSH and free-text terms: [(intussuscept*) OR (invaginat*) OR introversion OR telescoping OR (infold*)] AND [bowel OR gut OR (intestin*)] AND [(predict*) OR (prognos*) OR (forecast*) OR (outcome*)] AND [(laborator*) OR blood OR hematology OR haematology OR plasma OR serum OR acid-base OR urine OR (factor*) OR (test*) OR (indicator*) OR (marker*) OR (biomarker*)] AND [(pediatr*) OR (paediatr*) OR (child*) OR kids].
The Boolean logical operator expressions were used to search within databases, as follows:
PubMed: (“intussuscept*”[All Fields] OR “invaginat*”[All Fields] OR “introversion”[All Fields] OR “telescoping”[All Fields] OR “infold*”[All Fields]) AND (“bowel”[All Fields] OR “gut”[All Fields] OR “intestin*”[All Fields]) AND (“predict*”[All Fields] OR “prognos*”[All Fields] OR “forecast*”[All Fields] OR “outcome*”[All Fields]) AND (“laborator*”[All Fields] OR “blood”[All Fields] OR “hematology”[All Fields] OR “haematology”[All Fields] OR “plasma”[All Fields] OR “serum”[All Fields] OR “acid-base”[All Fields] OR “urine”[All Fields] OR “factor*”[All Fields] OR “test*”[All Fields] OR “indicator*”[All Fields] OR “marker*”[All Fields] OR “biomarker*”[All Fields]) AND (“pediatr*”[All Fields] OR “paediatr*”[All Fields] OR “child*”[All Fields] OR “kids”[All Fields]).
Scopus: TITLE-ABS-KEY ((((intussuscept*) OR (invaginat*) OR introversion OR telescoping OR (infold*)) AND ((bowel OR gut OR (intestin*)) AND ((predict*) OR (prognos*) OR (forecast*) OR (outcome*)) AND (laborator*) OR blood OR hematology OR haematology OR plasma OR serum OR acid-base OR urine OR (factor*) OR (test*) OR (indicator*) OR (marker*) OR (biomarker*)) AND ((pediatr*) OR (paediatr*) OR (child*) OR (kids))).
Web of Science (editions: A&HCI, BKCI-SSH, BKCI-S, CCR-EXPANDED, ESCI, IC, CPCI-SSH, CPCI-S, SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI): ((intussuscept*) OR (invaginat*) OR (introversion) OR (telescoping) OR (infold*)) AND ((bowel OR gut OR (intestin*)) AND ((predict*) OR (prognos*) OR (forecast*) OR (outcome*)) AND (laborator*) OR blood OR hematology OR haematology OR plasma OR serum OR acid-base OR urine OR (factor*) OR (test*) OR (indicator*) OR (marker*) OR (biomarker*)) AND ((pediatr*) OR (paediatr*) OR (child*) OR kids) (All Fields).
No filters were used during the search, nor were limits set regarding article type and language. Importantly, all included manuscripts were peer-reviewed articles, ensuring a standard of scientific rigor and quality. The search strategy was designed to be comprehensive yet specific, with the use of both controlled vocabulary and free-text keywords, and the Boolean operators were carefully structured to link biomarker-related terms with disease concepts, thereby minimizing the inclusion of unrelated laboratory studies. No text analysis tools or artificial intelligence algorithms were employed during the search or screening processes. The study selection process is described in Figure 1.

2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

To be included, the study had to contain data on patients aged between 0 and 18 years diagnosed with or treated for intussusception and in whom at least one prognostic or predictive biomarker was evaluated or included in the analysis, regardless of whether the study additionally dealt with clinical, radiological, and other indicators. Studies were excluded if they did not involve patients aged 0 to 18 years with diagnosed or treated intussusception; lacked assessment of prognostic or predictive biomarkers; were case reports, reviews, conference abstracts, editorials, book chapters, commentaries or debate reports; involved non-human subjects; contained insufficient or unusable data (e.g., missing key variables or incomplete datasets); or were not published in peer-reviewed journals. The following information was sought within the studies: patients’ age, patients’ gender, sample size, types of intussusceptions, causes of intussusception, type of biomarker, method of biomarker measurement, timing of biomarker assessment, predictive or prognostic outcomes, treatment modalities used, the association between biomarker and outcomes, and threshold or cutoff values used for positivity.

2.3. Screening Process, Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction

After removing duplicate records, studies were selected through a four-step process. First, titles and abstracts were independently screened by three investigators (K.J., K.P., and D.J.) who were blinded to each other’s assessments. Before screening, the investigators underwent training sessions to calibrate their understanding of the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, which were clearly specified in the protocol. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Cohen’s kappa statistic to ensure consistency during the initial screening phase (κ = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.65–0.91). In the second step, articles that met the preliminary criteria based on title and abstract were retrieved in full text. These full-text articles were reviewed independently by the same investigators, with blinding maintained to reduce bias. Disagreements between reviewers were discussed during a consensus meeting involving a fourth investigator (M.B.), where unresolved conflicts were documented and resolved through discussion until consensus was reached. Subsequently, the aforementioned data were extracted by the investigators, including reasons for exclusion during full-text review (see flow diagram summarizing the selection of studies for inclusion in the systematic review). The review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, CRD420251268322).

2.4. Assessment of the Methodological Quality and the Risk of Bias of Studies

Depending on the type of study, the methodological quality, and potential sources of bias in the included studies, they were independently assessed by K.J., K.P., D.J., and M.B. using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklists for Cohort Studies, Cross-sectional Studies, and Case–Control Studies [21] (Table S1). Disagreements between the investigators at various stages of the review were resolved through discussion. For scoring, each ‘Yes’ response was awarded one point, while ‘No’, ‘Unclear’, and ‘Not applicable’ responses received zero points. The total score was determined by summing the points from all ‘Yes’ responses and was then converted into a percentage by dividing by the maximum possible score. Based on this percentage, the methodological quality of each study was classified as low (<50%), moderate (50–74%), or high (>75%).

3. Results

3.1. Study Selection

Based on the described search strategy, a total of 1624 records were identified across the PubMed (275), Scopus (227), and Web of Science (1122) databases. Following deduplication, 423 duplicate records were removed prior to the screening process. During the initial screening based on titles and abstracts, 882 records were excluded. Subsequently, 319 articles remained, of which 272 were excluded based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Ultimately, 47 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in this systematic review. All included studies were original research articles employing retrospective or prospective study designs. The PRISMA flow diagram illustrating the literature selection process is presented in Figure 1.

3.2. Study Characteristics, Risk of Bias, and Summary of Included Studies

Upon assessing the methodological quality and risk of bias using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Cohort Studies, Cross-sectional Studies, and Case–Control Studies, 8 (17%) studies were classified as high quality, 33 (70.2%) as moderate quality, and 6 (12.8%) as low quality based on the overall quality assessment score (Table S1). The main risks of bias across the studies include unclear or unvalidated measurement of exposures and outcomes, insufficient control of confounding factors, and incomplete follow-up or inadequate reporting of follow-up procedures.
The most frequently represented countries from which the studies originate are China, which contributes a significant proportion of the studies, followed by Turkey, South Korea, and Taiwan. The geographic distribution highlights the wide international interest and research activity in the field of biomarkers in pediatric intussusception. The study designs across the included research are varied, with the majority being retrospective cohort studies. Based on the data from all 47 studies, the total sample size exceeds 20,000 patients, with individual study sizes ranging from as few as 18 to over 10,000 participants. The patients’ ages vary widely, from infants around 1 month old to late childhood, with many studies reporting mean ages between 6 months and 3 years. The gender distribution is generally balanced, though specific ratios differ across studies. Of the studies reporting types and causes, the most common type of intussusception observed was ileocolic. Most cases were idiopathic, while in some patients, pathological lead points were found. The main characteristics of the studies included in this systematic review are shown in Table 1.

3.3. Hematological and Blood Parameters

Hematological parameters have been extensively studied for their prognostic value in pediatric intussusception. The white blood cell (WBC) count is often associated with the severity and outcome of intussusception, with elevated WBC levels (>10 × 109/L and >20 × 109/L) serving as significant predictors of surgical intervention, bowel necrosis, and failure of reduction. The neutrophil count similarly correlates with adverse outcomes, with neutrophilia being associated with an increased risk of bowel necrosis, ischemia, and the need for surgery. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has emerged as a valuable inflammatory marker, with higher NLR values (>1.2, >4.52, or >5.72) associated with an increased likelihood of bowel necrosis, the need for surgery, and resection. Thresholds such as NLR > 4.52 and neutrophils >9420/cc have shown good sensitivity and specificity for predicting surgical intervention and bowel ischemia. Overall, elevated WBC, neutrophil count, and NLR are consistent indicators of more severe disease progression and poorer prognosis in pediatric intussusception [23,26,30,31,35,36,38,39,43,44,47,51,52,54,64,66,68]. Elevated monocyte ratios are strongly associated with early recurrence of intussusception, indicating their potential as a predictive marker for relapse. Increased platelet counts, when combined with other factors, help predict treatment success and the presence of intestinal necrosis. Notably, a platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) greater than 188.5 serves as a significant threshold, with high sensitivity and specificity, to identify patients at risk of intestinal necrosis and in need of surgical intervention [30,42,47,52]. Low hemoglobin levels, specifically below 12.2 g/dL, are significantly associated with failure of pneumatic reduction in children with ileocolic intussusception. Anemia markedly increases the likelihood of unsuccessful non-surgical reduction procedures, highlighting hemoglobin as a key prognostic biomarker in this setting [54,60].

3.4. Markers of Inflammation and Immune Response

Elevated CRP levels are strongly associated with worse clinical outcomes in pediatric intussusception, including the need for surgical intervention, bowel resection, and the presence of intestinal necrosis. Studies identify cutoff values ranging from approximately 3.4 mg/dL to over 11 mg/dL that can predict the likelihood of these complications with varying sensitivity and specificity. Higher CRP levels also correlate with increased inflammation and severity, making it a useful biomarker for risk stratification and guiding treatment decisions in affected children [28,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,44,47,52,58,62,63,65]. Elevated levels of IL-6 are consistently associated with disease activity and severity in ileal lesions, with IL-6 levels above 1.6 pg/mL serving as a key cutoff for positivity. Higher IL-6 levels correlate with worse outcomes and active disease, while decreases in these markers are linked to recovery. Other cytokines, including IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, and TNF-α, have been measured, with findings indicating that higher serum concentrations are associated with more severe tissue damage and worse outcomes [33,63,65]. Serum neopterin, a macrophage activation marker, also shows increased levels in complicated cases, indicating immune activation during severe intussusception [65]. Additionally, chemokines like MCP-1 are elevated in cases with early recurrence, serving as potential markers for relapse risk [48]. Serum endotoxins, signaling bacterial translocation due to mucosal compromise, are elevated in severe cases, further highlighting the immune response’s role in disease progression [65]. Neuro-immune peptides such as substance P and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) have also demonstrated altered serum levels, suggesting neuro-immune interactions involved in the pathogenesis and severity of intussusception [56].

3.5. Derived Ratios and Inflammatory Indices

Various derived ratios and indices have demonstrated high prognostic value in pediatric intussusception. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is among the most studied [26,27,28,30,35,44,52]. The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) also correlates with disease severity, with higher ratios associated with bowel ischemia and necrosis [30,52]. Low LCR values (below approximately 0.12 to 0.9) are strongly associated with an increased risk of intestinal necrosis and the need for bowel resection. An LCR cutoff of 0.1233 predicts the need for surgery with high sensitivity and specificity. Patients with LCR below this threshold are more likely to require resection due to necrosis [27,32,35,52]. The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), calculated from platelets, neutrophils, and lymphocytes, demonstrates remarkable sensitivity for predicting surgical needs [25]. An elevated CAR is significantly associated with the need for intestinal resection. A CAR value above 7.73 predicts a higher likelihood of necrosis, with high sensitivity and specificity. Each unit increase in CAR increases the risk of requiring surgery due to necrosis [27,35,52]. The HALP score, comprising hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocytes, and platelets, inversely correlates with disease severity, with lower scores indicating higher risk for complicated cases [30].

3.6. Biochemical and Metabolic Parameters

Serum biochemical parameters provide valuable prognostic information in pediatric intussusception. Electrolyte disturbances, notably hyponatremia and hypokalemia, are common in severe cases and are independently associated with increased risks of bowel ischemia, perforation, and necrosis. Hyponatremia (serum sodium < 135 mmol/L) is strongly associated with major surgical complications in children with intussusception, making it a key prognostic indicator. Hypokalemia (serum potassium < 3.5 mmol/L) is linked to a higher risk of failure of nonoperative management and may indicate more severe disease [29,34,46]. Lower serum albumin levels (≤3.5 g/dL) are strongly associated with increased risk of intestinal ischemia, necrosis, and the need for resection. Albumin, especially when combined with markers like CRP and other inflammatory factors, significantly improves prediction accuracy for adverse intestinal outcomes [35,52]. IMA levels are significantly elevated in intussusception cases and vary according to the severity of ischemia, although with moderate sensitivity and specificity at the identified cutoff of 60.1 ng/mL [40]. Elevated lactic acid levels are significantly associated with poorer outcomes in pediatric intussusception, with higher levels indicating increased risk. Lactic acid levels ≥ 3.0 mmol/L have a high positive predictive value (88.9%) for adverse prognosis. Overall, higher lactic acid concentrations correlate with worse clinical outcomes, making it a relevant biomarker for prognosis [55]. BUN is occasionally elevated in dehydrated or systemic shock states, but its direct predictive value is limited in this context [63]. Elevated serum TBA level (≥6.98 μmol/L) is a strong independent predictor of ischemia in children with HSP, associated with increased risks of intestinal necrosis, operative intervention, and longer hospital stays, highlighting its potential utility in risk stratification and management [41].

3.7. Oxidative Stress and Lipid Peroxidation Markers

Oxidative stress markers such as malondialdehyde (MDA) have been investigated as indicators of tissue injury severity. Elevated MDA levels reflect increased lipid peroxidation, correlating with ischemic damage and bowel necrosis in pediatric intussusception. Although data are limited, these markers may serve as adjuncts in assessing the extent of oxidative damage and tissue viability, highlighting the role of oxidative stress in disease progression [65].

3.8. Serum Proteins and Peptides

Alpha-GST is a strong predictor for the management of ileocolic intussusceptions, with levels above 3.29 ng/mL indicating a higher likelihood of requiring intervention. Elevated alpha-GST is significantly associated with cases that do not resolve spontaneously, showing a high diagnostic accuracy (AUC: 0.917) and good sensitivity (88.9%) and specificity (85.7%). Therefore, measuring alpha-GST can help identify patients who may need more aggressive treatment [28]. Intestinal fatty-acid-binding protein (I-FABP) has emerged as a promising marker, with higher serum levels correlating with the extent of bowel necrosis; a cutoff of approximately 1538 ng/mL has demonstrated moderate sensitivity and specificity for predicting bowel resection [59].

3.9. Acid-Base Balance and Gas Exchange Parameters

Blood gas analysis reveals that acidosis, characterized by decreased blood pH and bicarbonate levels, is prevalent in severe ischemic cases. Elevated lactic acid levels are associated with tissue hypoperfusion, bowel necrosis, and failure of non-surgical management. Such parameters are critical in early assessment, guiding timely surgical intervention to prevent irreversible damage [34,55].

3.10. Other Biomarkers and Novel Markers

Coagulation markers like fibrinogen and D-dimer are elevated in patients with bowel ischemia due to systemic inflammatory response and hypercoagulability. Elevated D-dimer levels, particularly above 0.24 mg/L and 1 mg/L, are strongly associated with gastrointestinal complications such as intestinal necrosis and ischemia in children with IgA vasculitis and Henoch–Schönlein purpura. Fibrinogen levels exceeding 1.26 g/L independently predict intestinal necrosis in children undergoing surgical reduction for intussusception [36,39,41,50,53]. Serum CK-MB, although traditionally a cardiac marker, has been explored in the context of systemic inflammation and ischemic injury; however, evidence regarding its utility remains limited [43]. Emerging biomarkers, such as serum transfer RNA fragments (tRFs), demonstrate promising diagnostic potential; for example, elevated levels of specific tRFs correlate with bowel necrosis and could serve as novel, non-invasive biomarkers [49].

4. Discussion

This systematic review synthesizes current evidence on predictive and prognostic biomarkers associated with pediatric intussusception, highlighting their potential to improve early diagnosis, assess disease severity, predict outcomes, and guide management strategies. The findings indicate that a wide array of biomarkers—ranging from hematological markers and indices, inflammatory markers, and biochemical markers to emerging molecular markers—are significantly associated with critical clinical outcomes such as bowel necrosis, recurrent episodes, failure of non-surgical reduction, and the need for surgical intervention. Notably, markers of systemic inflammation, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein, and cytokines like IL-6, consistently demonstrate strong predictive value for disease severity and complications. Similarly, biochemical parameters, including serum lactate, D-dimer, and electrolyte disturbances, serve as valuable indicators of ischemia and systemic response. The identification of novel biomarkers such as intestinal fatty-acid-binding protein, ischemia-modified albumin, and transfer RNA fragments opens promising avenues for non-invasive, rapid risk stratification. Collectively, these biomarkers have the potential to refine clinical decision-making, facilitate timely interventions, and ultimately improve outcomes in pediatric patients with intussusception.
Despite advances in diagnostic imaging and minimally invasive treatments, the management of pediatric intussusception is still largely driven by clinical judgment and imaging findings, which may sometimes be insufficient to predict disease course or guide optimal management [69,70,71,72]. The integration of biomarkers—measurable indicators reflecting disease severity, tissue ischemia, inflammatory response, or tissue injury—offers an appealing avenue to enhance clinical decision-making [73,74].
The pathophysiology of pediatric intussusception involves complex interactions between intestinal motility, lymphoid hyperplasia, infectious triggers, and possibly genetic predispositions. As the intussuscepted bowel becomes compromised, ischemia and necrosis ensue, leading to systemic inflammatory responses [75]. Currently, clinical assessment and imaging—primarily ultrasonography—are the mainstays for diagnosis and assessment of reduction success. However, these methods have limitations: clinical signs can be nonspecific, and imaging findings may not reliably predict ischemic severity or recurrence risk [69,71,72]. Biomarkers provide an objective, rapid, and potentially quantifiable means to assess disease activity and predict outcomes. They could facilitate early stratification of patients at high risk of complications, guide the urgency and type of intervention, and optimize resource utilization [76,77]. Nonetheless, the heterogeneity of biomarker studies, variable methodologies, and inconsistent cutoff values underscore the need for critical evaluation before routine clinical application.
Markers such as CRP, WBC counts, and derived ratios (NLR, PLR, LCR) are among the most studied due to their ubiquity and ease of measurement. Their strength lies in their reflection of systemic inflammation and immune response, which are central to ischemic injury in intussusception. Elevated CRP and neutrophil counts have consistently been associated with bowel necrosis, suggesting their utility in identifying children requiring surgical intervention [28,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,44,47,52,58,62,63,65].
However, these markers are nonspecific. Elevated CRP and leukocyte counts can result from various infectious and inflammatory conditions, limiting their specificity in isolating ischemic severity solely attributable to intussusception. Moreover, their levels can be influenced by concomitant infections, dehydration, or systemic illness, confounding their interpretation [78,79,80]. The dynamic nature of inflammation also necessitates consideration of timing—serial measurements may be more informative than single values.
Derivatives such as NLR and PLR have demonstrated promising predictive capacity, integrating inflammatory cell ratios that may better reflect the balance between pro- and anti-inflammatory responses [81]. The high sensitivity and specificity reported for certain cutoff values, such as NLR > 4.5, are encouraging [44]. Nevertheless, these ratios are influenced by hematological variations unrelated to bowel ischemia, such as hematological disorders or anemia [82,83]. Standardization across laboratories and validation in diverse populations are essential before widespread adoption.
Serum lactate and D-dimer are biochemical markers with direct relevance to tissue hypoperfusion and coagulation activation, respectively. Elevated lactate levels are strongly associated with tissue hypoxia and ischemia, making them logical markers for bowel necrosis. Their predictive value for bowel necrosis and adverse outcomes has been well documented, and they are widely used in adult ischemic conditions [84,85]. Nevertheless, lactate levels can be elevated in other systemic conditions, including sepsis, hypotension, or metabolic disturbances, which may co-occur in critically ill children [86]. The timing of sampling relative to symptom onset is crucial; early lactate measurements might underestimate severity if taken before significant hypoperfusion develops [87]. D-dimer, a marker of hypercoagulability, correlates with ischemic vascular injury but lacks specificity, as elevated levels are common in infections, inflammation, and thrombotic states [88]. Their combined use, however, may enhance predictive accuracy for bowel necrosis [50,53,55].
Novel biomarkers such as I-FABP, alpha-GST, and MCP-1 have garnered interest due to their specificity for intestinal mucosal injury or ischemia [28,48,59]. I-FABP, a small cytoplasmic protein released during mucosal injury, has shown promise in early detection of bowel necrosis with moderate sensitivity and specificity. Its rapid release upon epithelial injury renders it suitable for early assessment, potentially before irreversible damage occurs [89,90]. Similarly, alpha-GST is a marker of hepatocyte and mucosal stress, with elevated levels correlating with necrosis [91]. MCP-1 and other cytokines reflect immune activation and chemokine-mediated recruitment of inflammatory cells, which are integral to ischemic injury progression [92]. While these biomarkers offer specificity advantages, their measurement often involves specialized assays, which may not be readily available in all clinical settings. Additionally, their kinetics, optimal timing, and cutoff thresholds require further validation in large, prospective pediatric cohorts.
The combination of individual biomarkers into ratios or indices aims to harness synergistic predictive information. The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and CRP/albumin ratio (CAR), for example, integrate inflammatory cell counts, acute-phase reactants, and nutritional status, reflecting a holistic picture of disease severity [25,27]. These composite indices have demonstrated high predictive values in preliminary studies, offering practical advantages: they utilize routinely available laboratory data and may improve risk stratification accuracy. Nonetheless, their clinical utility hinges on establishing standardized cutoff values, understanding confounding factors, and validating their predictive performance across different populations and clinical settings [93,94].
Despite the promising findings, several limitations temper the immediate clinical translation of these biomarkers. First, many studies are retrospective, with inherent biases and heterogeneity in patient populations, methodologies, and outcome definitions. Variability in assay techniques, timing of sample collection, and cutoff thresholds hampers comparability and generalizability. Second, the complex pathophysiology of intussusception and its complications implies that no single biomarker can reliably predict all clinical outcomes. Combining multiple markers into predictive models or nomograms may improve accuracy, but these models require rigorous validation and prospective testing before routine use [31,37,38,42,43]. Third, the influence of confounding factors—such as infections, dehydration, comorbidities, and systemic inflammatory states—must be carefully considered. Biomarkers like CRP and leukocyte counts are sensitive but nonspecific; thus, their interpretation must be contextualized within the broader clinical picture. Finally, logistical considerations such as assay availability, cost, turnaround time, and the need for serial measurements must be addressed. Biomarkers with rapid, point-of-care testing capabilities will be most valuable in urgent pediatric settings [74].
Currently, in clinical practice, hematological markers such as elevated WBC count, neutrophil levels, and NLR are the most consistently useful for risk assessment. Serum lactate further offers practical value in detecting tissue hypoperfusion and necrosis. While cytokines like IL-6 and MCP-1, as well as molecular markers such as I-FABP and alpha-GST, show potential for higher specificity, their use remains limited to research settings due to assay complexity and insufficient validation. Conversely, markers like CRP and D-dimer, though easily accessible, are too nonspecific to guide clinical decisions independently. Therefore, current practice should prioritize routine inflammatory and biochemical markers—WBC, neutrophil levels, NLR, lactate—integrated with clinical and imaging assessments, while molecular biomarkers await further validation before routine implementation.
The current landscape underscores the need for multicenter, prospective studies with standardized protocols to validate promising biomarkers and establish universally applicable cutoff values. The integration of biomarkers into clinical algorithms holds potential, but it must be complemented with clinical and imaging findings to optimize decision-making. The exploration of novel molecular markers, such as microRNAs, transfer RNA fragments, and serum proteomics, offers exciting prospects for non-invasive, highly specific diagnostics [95,96]. Advances in high-throughput technologies and bioinformatics could enable the development of comprehensive biomarker panels, facilitating personalized risk stratification [97]. Furthermore, longitudinal studies tracking biomarker kinetics pre- and post-intervention could elucidate their roles in monitoring disease progression, response to treatment, and recurrence risk [98]. The development of rapid, bedside assays for key markers like I-FABP and lactate would significantly enhance their clinical applicability [74,99].

5. Conclusions

Biomarker research in pediatric intussusception is a rapidly evolving field that promises to augment current diagnostic and prognostic tools. While traditional inflammatory and hematological markers provide valuable insights, their limitations necessitate cautious interpretation and validation. The advent of molecular and protein biomarkers offers hope for more specific and early detection of ischemic severity and complications. However, the translation of these findings into routine clinical practice requires rigorous validation, standardization, and integration within clinical workflows. Ultimately, the goal is to develop reliable, rapid, and non-invasive biomarker-based algorithms that can guide timely interventions, reduce morbidity, and improve long-term outcomes for children afflicted by this potentially life-threatening condition. Achieving this will depend on continued multidisciplinary research, technological innovation, and collaborative validation efforts.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm15083114/s1, Table S1: Methodological quality of included studies according to JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Cohort Studies, Cross-sectional Studies, and Case–Control Studies; PRISMA 2020 Checklist.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.B.; methodology, K.J., K.P., D.J. and M.B.; validation, K.J., K.P. and M.B.; formal analysis, K.J., K.P., D.J. and M.B.; investigation, K.J., K.P., D.J. and M.B.; resources, K.J., K.P., D.J. and M.B.; data curation, K.J., K.P. and D.J.; writing—original draft preparation, K.J., K.P., D.J. and M.B.; writing—review and editing, M.B.; visualization, K.J., K.P., D.J. and M.B.; supervision, M.B.; project administration, M.B.; funding acquisition, M.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank the authors who, upon request, submitted their full texts of the articles included in this systematic review: Carlos Delgado-Miguel (Department of Pediatric Surgery, Prisma Health Children’s Hospital, Columbia, South Carolina, United States), Solomon Chih-Cheng Chen (Department of Pediatrics, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Taiwan), and Çelebi Kocaoğlu (Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, Konya City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Konya, Turkey). We also thank Tamara Marija Seme, at the Children’s Hospital Zagreb, who helped collect and deliver non-open-access articles.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
PRISMAPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis
JBIJoanna Briggs Institute
CRPC-reactive protein
NECNecrotizing enterocolitis
IBDInflammatory bowel disease
RNARibonucleic acid
ELISAEnzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
VIPVasoactive intestinal peptide
SPSubstance P
tRNATransfer ribonucleic acid
tRFsTransfer ribonucleic acid-derived fragments
qRT-PCRQuantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction
yrsYears
mthMonth
OROdds ratio
WBCWhite blood cells
TBATotal bile acid
HSPHenoch–Schönlein purpura
AIAcute intussusception
ROCReceiver operating characteristic
MdnMedian
ICUIntensive care unit
GASGastrin
MTLMotilin
ILInterleukin
TNF-αTumor necrosis factor-α
ESRErythrocyte sedimentation rate
TLCTotal leukocyte counts
CBCComplete blood count
PLRPlatelet-to-lymphocyte ratio
CARC-reactive protein/albumin ratio
NLRNeutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio
LCRLymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio
IgAVIgA vasculitis
CK-MBCreatine kinase-MB
I-FABPIntestinal fatty-acid-binding protein
SIISystemic immune inflammatory index
SIRISystemic inflammation response index
PNRPlatelet-to-neutrophil ratio
LMRLymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio
alpha-GSTAlpha-glutathione S-transferase
NaSodium
KPotassium
USGHRUltrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction
IgImmunoglobulin
EndoCAbAntiendotoxin core antibody
HPLCHigh-performance liquid chromatography
MCP-1Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1
IMAIschemia-modified albumin
BUNBlood urea nitrogen

References

  1. Marsicovetere, P.; Ivatury, S.J.; White, B.; Holubar, S.D. Intestinal Intussusception: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Clin. Colon Rectal Surg. 2017, 30, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Alnamshan, M.; Almatroudi, D.; ALmutairi, D.; Almagushi, N.A.; Almadhi, L.; Alenazi, A.M. Idiopathic Intussusception in Infants and Children: Different Outcomes in Relation to Interventions. Cureus 2023, 15, e48026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Attoun, M.A.; Albalawi, S.M.D.; Ayoub, A.; Alnasser, A.K.; Alkaram, E.H.; Khubrani, F.A.; Alzahrani, K.J.; Alatawi, K.A.; Almutairi, N.; Alnami, A.G. The Management of Intussusception: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2023, 15, e49481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, L.; Zhang, H.; Wang, D.; Shen, Q.; Huang, L.; Liu, T. Clinical features of intussusception in children secondary to small bowel tumours: A retrospective study of 31 cases. BMC Pediatr. 2024, 24, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rahmani, E.; Amani-Beni, R.; Hekmatnia, Y.; Fakhre Yaseri, A.; Ahadiat, S.A.; Talebi Boroujeni, P.; Kiani, M.; Tavakoli, R.; Shafagh, S.G.; Shirazinia, M.; et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography for Detection of Intussusception in Children; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2023, 11, e24. [Google Scholar]
  6. Rice-Townsend, S.; Chen, C.; Barnes, J.N.; Rangel, S.J. Variation in practice patterns and resource utilization surrounding management of intussusception at freestanding Children’s Hospitals. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2013, 48, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hwang, J.; Yoon, H.M.; Kim, P.H.; Jung, A.Y.; Lee, J.S.; Cho, Y.A. Current diagnosis and image-guided reduction for intussusception in children. Clin. Exp. Pediatr. 2023, 66, 12–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhao, J.; Sun, J.; Li, D.; Xu, W.J. Laparoscopic versus open reduction of idiopathic intussusception in children: An updated institutional experience. BMC Pediatr. 2022, 22, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, S.M.; Wu, X.Y.; Luo, C.F.; Yu, L.J. Laparoscopic approach for managing intussusception in children: Analysis of 65 cases. World J. Clin. Cases 2022, 10, 830–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kelley-Quon, L.I.; Arthur, L.G.; Williams, R.F.; Goldin, A.B.; St Peter, S.D.; Beres, A.L.; Hu, Y.Y.; Renaud, E.J.; Ricca, R.; Slidell, M.B.; et al. Management of intussusception in children: A systematic review. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2021, 56, 587–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Gluckman, S.; Karpelowsky, J.; Webster, A.C.; McGee, R.G. Management for intussusception in children. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017, 6, CD006476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ahmad, A.; Imran, M.; Ahsan, H. Biomarkers as Biomedical Bioindicators: Approaches and Techniques for the Detection, Analysis, and Validation of Novel Biomarkers of Diseases. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Clough, J.; Colwill, M.; Poullis, A.; Pollok, R.; Patel, K.; Honap, S. Biomarkers in inflammatory bowel disease: A practical guide. Therap Adv. Gastroenterol. 2024, 17, 17562848241251600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ciurea, N.A.; Pantea, C.M.; Grama, P.; Kosovski, I.B.; Bataga, S. Fecal Zonulin as a Non-Invasive Marker of Intestinal Permeability: Findings from a Prospective Cohort Study. Medicina 2025, 61, 1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Guo, H.; Li, Y.; Wang, L. Assessment of inflammatory biomarkers to identify surgical/death necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants without pneumoperitoneum. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2024, 40, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hu, H.; Chen, G.; Bai, D.; Wu, G.; Wu, Y.; Guo, S.; Tang, Y.; Liu, Q.; Hu, J.; Tian, Y. Diagnostic accuracy of routine hematological biomarkers for complications and prognosis in bowel obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J. Emerg. Surg. 2025, 20, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zafirovski, A.; Zafirovska, M.; Kuhelj, D.; Pintar, T. The Impact of Biomarkers on the Early Detection of Acute Mesenteric Ischemia. Biomedicines 2023, 12, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sarshar, M.; Scribano, D.; Ambrosi, C.; Palamara, A.T.; Masotti, A. Fecal microRNAs as Innovative Biomarkers of Intestinal Diseases and Effective Players in Host-Microbiome Interactions. Cancers 2020, 12, 2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rashid, H.; Hossain, B.; Siddiqua, T.; Kabir, M.; Noor, Z.; Ahmed, M.; Haque, R. Fecal MicroRNAs as Potential Biomarkers for Screening and Diagnosis of Intestinal Diseases. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2020, 7, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Munn, Z.; Barker, T.H.; Moola, S.; Tufanaru, C.; Stern, C.; McArthur, A.; Stephenson, M.; Aromataris, E. Methodological quality of case series studies: An introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool. JBI Evid. Synth. 2020, 18, 2127–2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Soleimanpour, Z.; Memarian, S.; Rajabi, M.M.; Zamani, Z.; Alimadadi, H.; Gharib, B. Clinical and paraclinical differences between pediatric patients requiring surgical versus non-surgical treatment for intussusception: A retrospective study at a referral center in Iran. BMC Surg. 2025, 25, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ammar, S.; Sellami, I.; Krichen, E.; Rhaiem, W.; Sellami, S.; Hbaieb, M.; Kammoun, M.; Jarraya, A.; Zitouni, H.; Mhiri, R. Predicting surgical intervention in pediatric intussusception using machine learning model. Tunis. Med. 2025, 103, 792–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kamffer, C.M.; du Preez, H.; van Rensburg, J.J. Risk factors associated with the outcomes of fluoroscopy-guided pneumatic enema reductions of intussusceptions. SA J. Radiol. 2025, 29, 3155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, D.; Cai, H.; He, Q.Q.; Wang, S.; Li, F.; Zhang, J.; Fu, Y.J.; Su, Z.L.; Jiang, Y.D.; Jing, L. Systemic immune inflammatory index (SII) as a predictive marker for the failure of air enema treatment in children with Ileocolic intussusception: A case-control study. BMC Pediatr. 2025, 26, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xu, X.X.; Cai, Y.J.; Liu, J.; Zhuang, Y.; Ma, Q. Predicting bowel necrosis in pediatric acute intussusception using roundness and other related factors. BMC Pediatr. 2025, 25, 843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Elhadidi, M.; Elghazaly, M.; El-Saied, A.W.; Awad, M.; Elayyouti, M. Bypassing the Delay: Directing Pediatric Intussusception Cases to the OR Through Inflammatory Marker Assessment. World J. Surg. 2025, 49, 1519–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ulusoy, E.; Ulusoy, O.; Sütçüoğlu, N.; Küme, T.; Şık, N.; Yılmaz, D.; Duman, M. Is it possible to predict the spontaneous reduction of pediatric intussusception using biomarkers? Pediatr. Int. 2025, 67, e70141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Chang, C.Y.; Chen, S.C.; Kuo, H.C.; Huo, C.H.; Tsai, C.F.; Yang, H.Y. Beyond hyponatremia: The crucial role of hypernatremia and hypokalemia in pediatric intussusception surgical outcomes. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2025, 162835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Tuşat, M.; Memiş, S. Evaluation of inflammatory markers and HALP score in childhood intussusceptions. Ann. Clin. Anal. Med. 2025, 16, 530–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yu, Y.Y.; Zhang, J.J.; Xu, Y.T.; Lin, Z.X.; Guo, S.K.; Li, Z.R.; Huang, H.Y.; Huang, X.Z. Developing and validating a nomogram for early predicting the need for intestinal resection in pediatric intussusception. Front. Pediatr. 2024, 12, 1409046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xia, B.; Chen, G.; Liu, Q.; Yan, C.; Lu, P.; Guo, C. A comprehensive scoring system for the better prediction of bowel resection in pediatric intussusception. BMC Gastroenterol. 2024, 24, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wei, X.Y.; Huo, H.C.; Li, X.; Sun, S.L.; Zhang, J. Relationship between postoperative rehabilitation style, gastrointestinal function, and inflammatory factor levels in children with intussusception. World J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2024, 16, 2640–2648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shah, J.Y.; Banday, I.; Hamdani, H.Z.; Haq, M.F.; Parray, F.Q.; Banday, M.; Bhat, G.A. A Study of Predictors of Failure of Nonoperative Management of Ileocolic Intussusception in Children. Euroasian J. Hepatogastroenterol. 2024, 14, 81–85. [Google Scholar]
  35. Budiananti, A.; Hariastawa, I.A.; Matulatan, F. Correlation between pathology indicators and intestinal necrosis in pediatric intussusception. Chirurgia 2024, 37, 183–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mu, J.; Hao, J.; Zhen, X.; Mo, X.; Sheng, Y. Surgical complications in children with IgA vasculitis: Clinical analysis of 28 cases. Investig. Clín. 2024, 65, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Duan, G.; Mao, X.; Zeng, D. Developing a Nomogram for Predicting Surgical Intervention in Pediatric Intussusception After Pneumatic Reduction: A Multicenter Study from China. Ther. Clin. Risk. Manag. 2024, 20, 313–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, J.; Zeng, D.; Jiang, Z.; Xiu, W.; Mao, X.; Li, H. Developing a nomogram to predict recurrent intussusception after pneumatic reduction of primary intussusception in children. BMC Surg. 2024, 24, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mu, J. Clinical characteristics and risk factors of IgA vasculitis with intussusception and intestinal perforation. J. Paediatr. Child. Health 2024, 60, 5–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Kocaoğlu, Ç.; Kocaoğlu, C.; Madenci, H. Can Ischemia-Modified Albumin Be a Helpful Marker in the Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Childhood Intussusception? Pediatr. Emerg. Care 2024, 40, e105–e107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yu, S.; Feng, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, M.; Tu, Y.; Guo, Z. Serum total bile acid levels assist in the prediction of acute intussusception with abdominal type Henoch-Schonlein purpura in children. Front. Pediatr. 2023, 11, 1183470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Yang, M.; Xie, Y.; Zhuang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Lin, X.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, P.; Xiao, W.; Chen, Y.; Chen, C.; et al. Risk factors and predictive models for early recurrent intussusception in children: A retrospective cohort study. Transl. Pediatr. 2023, 12, 1800–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhuang, Y.; Wang, X.; Fan, X.; Li, F.; He, G.; Luo, M.; Tang, Y. Developing a nomogram for predicting surgical intervention in pediatric intussusception after hydrostatic reduction. Front. Pediatr. 2023, 11, 1092548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Delgado-Miguel, C.; García, A.; Delgado, B.; Muñoz-Serrano, A.J.; Miguel-Ferrero, M.; Camps, J.; Lopez-Santamaria, M.; Martinez, L. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor of the Need for Surgical Treatment in Children’s Intussusception. Eur. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2023, 33, 422–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, J.; Dong, Q.; Su, X.; Long, J. Factors associated with in-hospital recurrence of intestinal intussusception in children. BMC Pediatr. 2023, 23, 428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wu, T.H.; Huang, G.S.; Wu, C.T.; Lai, J.Y.; Chen, C.C.; Hu, M.H. Clinical characteristics of pediatric intussusception and predictors of bowel resection in affected patients. Front. Surg. 2022, 9, 926089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Liu, Z.; Yu, M.; Li, N.; Hu, M.; Su, F.; Hong, L.; Deng, X.; Zhang, S.; Tao, Q. Predictors of Surgical Treatment of Intussusception and Intussusception Complicated with Intestinal Necrosis in Children. Inn. J. Pediatr. 2022, 32, e117708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhu, D.; Xu, X.; Zhang, M.; Wang, T.; Zhu, H. Significance of MCP-1 in predicting the short-term recurrence of primary intussusception in children: An observational study. Medicine 2022, 101, e30743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhao, L.; Chen, W.; Guo, W.L. Serum tRNA-derived fragments as potential biomarkers in children with acute intussusception. Arch. Med. Sci. 2021, 19, 1889–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Huang, H.Y.; Lin, X.K.; Guo, S.K.; Bao, X.Z.; Lin, Z.X.; Li, Z.R.; Huang, X.Z. Haemostatic indexes for predicting intestinal necrosis in children with intussusception. ANZ J. Surg. 2021, 91, 1485–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Hou, J.; Hou, J.; Die, X.; Sun, J.; Zhang, M.; Liu, W.; Wang, Y. Impact of overweight/obesity on clinical outcomes after reduction for intussusception in children. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2021, 37, 887–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Chen, B.; Cao, J.; Yan, C.; Zheng, C.; Chen, J.; Guo, C. A promising new predictive factor for detecting bowel resection in childhood intussusception: The lymphocyte-C-reactive protein ratio. BMC Pediatr. 2021, 21, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhao, Q.; Yang, Y.; He, S.W.; Wang, X.T.; Liu, C. Risk factors for intussusception in children with Henoch-Schönlein purpura: A case-control study. World J. Clin. Cases 2021, 9, 6244–6253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Younes, A.; Lee, S.; Lee, J.I.; Seo, J.M.; Jung, S.M. Factors Associated with Failure of Pneumatic Reduction in Children with Ileocolic Intussusception. Children 2021, 8, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lee, J.Y.; Byun, Y.H.; Park, J.S.; Lee, J.S.; Ryu, J.M.; Choi, S.J. Lactic acid level as an outcome predictor in pediatric patients with intussusception in the emergency department. BMC Pediatr. 2020, 20, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zhu, Z.C.; Wang, H.B.; Yan, X.Q.; Yang, J.; Duan, X.F.; Bian, H.Q.; Kuang, H.F. Serum substance P and vasoactive intestinal peptide levels in infants with acute intussusception. J. Int. Med. Res. 2019, 47, 2446–2451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Xiaolong, X.; Yang, W.; Qi, W.; Yiyang, Z.; Bo, X. Risk factors for failure of hydrostatic reduction of intussusception in pediatric patients: A retrospective study. Medicine 2019, 98, e13826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Lee, D.H.; Kim, S.J.; Lee, H.J.; Jang, H.J. Identifying Predictive Factors for the Recurrence of Pediatric Intussusception. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Nutr. 2019, 22, 142–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ademuyiwa, A.; Alakaloko, F.; Elebute, O.; Bode, C.; Udenze, I. Serum intestinal fatty-acid binding protein: Predictor of bowel necrosis in pediatric intussusception. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2018, 53, 335–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lim, R.Z.M.; Lee, T.; Ng, J.Y.Z.; Quek, K.F.; Abdul Wahab, N.; Amansah, S.L.; Vellusamy, V.M.A.M.; Ngim, C.F. Factors associated with ultrasound-guided water enema reduction for pediatric intussusception in resource-limited setting: Potential predictive role of thrombocytosis and anemia. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2018, 53, 2312–2317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tamas, V.; Ishimine, P. Comparison of Lactic Acid Levels in Children with Suspected and Confirmed Intussusception. J. Emerg. Med. 2017, 53, 815–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Carapinha, C.; Truter, M.; Bentley, A.; Welthagen, A.; Loveland, J. Factors determining clinical outcomes in intussusception in the developing world: Experience from Johannesburg, South Africa. S. Afr. Med. J. 2016, 106, 177–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Karabulut, B.; Erdoğan, D.; Bostancı, I.; Onde, U.; Karakoç, A.E. Are interleukin-6, body mass index and atopy crucial in infantile intussusception? Indian J. Pediatr. 2010, 77, 1257–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Fragoso, A.C.; Campos, M.; Tavares, C.; Costa-Pereira, A.; Estevão-Costa, J. Pneumatic reduction of childhood intussusception. Is prediction of failure important? J. Pediatr. Surg. 2007, 42, 1504–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Willetts, I.E.; Kite, P.; Barclay, G.R.; Banks, R.E.; Rumley, A.; Allgar, V.; Stringer, M.D. Endotoxin, cytokines and lipid peroxides in children with intussusception. Br. J. Surg. 2001, 88, 878–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. McDermott, V.G.; Taylor, T.; Mackenzie, S.; Hendry, G.M. Pneumatic reduction of intussusception: Clinical experience and factors affecting outcome. Clin. Radiol. 1994, 49, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Frey, B.; Kistler, W. Reactive lymphocytes and intussusception in childhood. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 1994, 9, 360–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Reijnen, J.A.; Festen, C.; van Roosmalen, R.P. Intussusception: Factors related to treatment. Arch. Dis. Child. 1990, 65, 871–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Guo, H.; Lei, H.; Luo, J.; Yang, J.; Bian, H.; Yang, H.; Guo, Q. Clinical manifestation and treatment of intussusception in children aged 3 months and under: A single centre analysis of 38 cases. BMC Pediatr. 2025, 25, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Alsabri, M.; Rath, S.; Elkarargy, M.A.; Aboali, A.A.; Abouelmagd, K.; Ramadan, A.A.A.; Gamboa, L.L.; Yoo, P.; Cheng, Y. Accuracy of ultrasound for intussusception in pediatric emergency presentations: A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis. Int. J. Emerg. Med. 2026, 19, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Sandhu, A.I.; Abdullah, M.F.; Habib, T.; Arif, H. Diagnostic Accuracy of Sonographic Findings of Intestinal Intussusception in Paediatric Population with Surgical Outcomes as Gold Standard. Indus J. Biosci. Res. 2025, 3, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Pušnik, L.; Slak, P.; Nikšić, S.; Winant, A.J.; Lee, E.Y.; Plut, D. Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: Comparison of success rates between subspecialized pediatric radiologists and non-pediatric radiologists or radiology residents. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2023, 182, 3257–3264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Bencardino, S.; D’aMico, F.; Zilli, A.; Parigi, T.L.; Allocca, M.; Fiorino, G.; Danese, S.; Furfaro, F. Fecal, Blood, and Urinary Biomarkers in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. J. Transl. Gastroenterol. 2024, 2, 61–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Abdelrahman, S.T.; Omran, J.A.; Del Castillo Miranda, J.C.; Onyejesi, C.D.; Hamam, M.; Ebraheem, E.A.; Alsabri, M. Point-of-Care Biomarkers in Pediatric Emergency Medicine: Advancing Rapid Diagnostics, Overcoming Limitations, and Shaping Future Innovations. Curr. Treat. Options Peds. 2025, 11, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Yan, Q.; Xu, L.; Chao, J.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, H. Characteristics of intestinal-related lymphoid hyperplasia in children and its correlation with intussusception of children. BMC Pediatr. 2022, 22, 641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Jain, K.K. Role of Biomarkers in Health Care. In The Handbook of Biomarkers; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2010; pp. 115–188. [Google Scholar]
  77. Chen, L.; Zhang, X.; Shi, P. Recent advances in biomarkers for detection and diagnosis of sepsis and organ dysfunction: A comprehensive review. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2025, 30, 1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Mouliou, D.S. C-Reactive Protein: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, False Test Results and a Novel Diagnostic Algorithm for Clinicians. Diseases 2023, 11, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Singh, B.; Goyal, A.; Patel, B.C. C-Reactive Protein: Clinical Relevance and Interpretation. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  80. Alhazmi, H.; Alzahrani, A.; Alshaikh, S.; Azzhary, L.; Alhaddad, F.; Alshamrani, Z.; Alwagdani, R. The Significance of Inflammatory Markers in Pediatric Patients with Acute Gastroenteritis Presenting to the Emergency Department. Children 2025, 12, 617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Tan, S.; Yang, X.; Mu, X.; Liu, S.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Bian, Y.; Xu, C. The predictive role of peripheral serum inflammatory markers NLR, PLR, and LMR in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Immunol. 2025, 16, 1623899. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  82. Alshuweishi, Y.; Alfaifi, M.; Almoghrabi, Y.; Al-Sheikh, Y.A.; Alfhili, M.A. A Retrospective Analysis of the Association of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) with Anemia in the Saudi Population. Medicina 2023, 59, 1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Lin, B.D.; Hottenga, J.J.; Abdellaoui, A.; Dolan, C.V.; de Geus, E.J.C.; Kluft, C.; Boomsma, D.I.; Willemsen, G. Causes of variation in the neutrophil-lymphocyte and platelet-lymphocyte ratios: A twin-family study. Biomark. Med. 2016, 10, 1061–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Honore, P.M.; Jacobs, R.; Hendrickx, I.; De Waele, E.; Spapen, H.D. Lactate: The Black Peter in high-risk gastrointestinal surgery patients. J. Thorac. Dis. 2016, 8, E440-2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Montagnana, M.; Danese, E.; Lippi, G. Biochemical markers of acute intestinal ischemia: Possibilities and limitations. Ann. Transl. Med. 2018, 6, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Belu, A.; Filip, N.; Trandafir, L.M.; Spoială, E.L.; Țarcă, E.; Zamosteanu, D.; Ghiga, G.; Bernic, J.; Jehac, A.; Cojocaru, E. Lactate, an Essential Metabolic Marker in the Diagnosis and Management of Pediatric Conditions. Diagnostics 2025, 15, 816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Lingayat, N.; Jani, P. Early Lactate Clearance vs. Initial Lactate Levels: Which Predicts Mortality Better? A Systematic Review. Vasc. Endovasc. Rev. 2025, 8, 4–8. [Google Scholar]
  88. Esmailian, M.; Vakili, Z.; Nasr-Esfahani, M.; Heydari, F.; Masoumi, B. D-dimer Levels in Predicting Severity of Infection and Outcome in Patients with COVID-19. Tanaffos 2022, 21, 419–433. [Google Scholar]
  89. Liu, S.; Liu, Y.; Lai, S.; Xie, Y.; Xiu, W.; Yang, C. Values of serum intestinal fatty acid-binding protein, fecal calprotectin, and fecal human β-defensin 2 for predicting necrotizing enterocolitis. BMC Pediatr. 2024, 24, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Voth, M.; Duchene, M.; Auner, B.; Lustenberger, T.; Relja, B.; Marzi, I. I-FABP is a Novel Marker for the Detection of Intestinal Injury in Severely Injured Trauma Patients. World J. Surg. 2017, 41, 3120–3127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Khurana, S.; Corbally, M.T.; Manning, F.; Armenise, T.; Kierce, B.; Kilty, C. Glutathione S-transferase: A potential new marker of intestinal ischemia. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2002, 37, 1543–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Ztriva, E.; Moschonas, I.C.; Tselepis, A.; Lambrou, D.; Ntaios, G.; Savopoulos, C.; Kaiafa, G. Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 as a Biomarker in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Prospective Pilot Study. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 3295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zhang, Y.; Xiao, G.; Wang, R. Clinical significance of systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) in patients with esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis. Cancer Manag. Res. 2019, 11, 4185–4200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Coşkun, S.; Güngörer, V.; Öner, N.; Sezer, M.; Karagöl, C.; Tekin, Z.E.; Tekgöz, P.N.; Kaplan, M.M.; Polat, M.C.; Çelikel, E.; et al. The role of indices in predicting disease severity and outcomes of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. Pediatr. Int. 2023, 65, e15609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Jeong, H.R.; Hwang, I.T. MicroRNAs as novel biomarkers for the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric diseases. Clin. Exp. Pediatr. 2024, 67, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Baldassarre, A.; Felli, C.; Prantera, G.; Masotti, A. Circulating microRNAs and Bioinformatics Tools to Discover Novel Diagnostic Biomarkers of Pediatric Diseases. Genes 2017, 8, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Obeagu, E.I. Integrative bioinformatics approaches for early detection biomarkers in ovarian cancer. Ann. Med. Surg. 2026, 88, 1687–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Servian, J.E.; Brady, B.; Biswas, P.; Sukumar, T.K.; King, S.E. Pharmacoepigenetic Biomarkers in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Narrative Review. Yale J. Biol. Med. 2025, 98, 171–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Kumar, D.R.; Banaś, A.; Krukiewicz, K. Challenges and Advances in Biomarker Detection for Rapid and Accurate Sepsis Diagnosis: An Electrochemical Approach. Biosensors 2024, 14, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram.
Jcm 15 03114 g001
Table 1. Articles included in the systematic review.
Table 1. Articles included in the systematic review.
Author(s), Year of
Publication
CountryStudy Design Sample Size, Male:
Female, Patients’ Age
Type of
Intussusception
Cause Type of
Biomarker
Method of Biomarker MeasurementTiming of Biomarker AssessmentPredictive/Prognostic Outcomes Treatment Modalities UsedAssociation
Between
Biomarkers and Outcomes
Threshold or Cutoff Values Used for
Positivity
Soleimanpour et al., 2025 [22]IranRetrospective cohort study165 (55—underwent surgery, 110—treated non-surgically), 116:49, 2.68 ± 1.65 yrs/3.88 ± 3.51 yrsLocation of the intussusception: ileoileal (n = 8), ileocolic (n = 112), colocolic (n = 2), right lower quadrant (n = 12), right upper quadrant (n = 19), left lower quadrant (n = 3), left upper quadrant (n = 1), jejunojenunal (n = 3), jejuno-ileal (n = 1), multiple (n = 4)NAWBC, ESR, CRPBlood testsPre-treatmentComparison of groups, comparison of clinical and paraclinical characteristicsHydrostatic or pneumatic reduction, surgeryLaboratory test results showed no significant differences between groups (p > 0.05). The study found that younger age, bloody stools, and ileocolic location were associated with a higher likelihood of needing surgeryNA
Ammar et al., 2025 [23]TunisiaRetrospective cohort study156 (109—training group, 47—validation group)IleocolicNAWBC, CRP, sodium, potassium, chlorideBlood testsAt diagnosisLikelihood of requiring surgical interventionHydrostatic or pneumatic reduction, surgeryThe univariate analysis showed that the elevated WBC (p = 0.029) was associated with surgical treatment. Bloody stools (p = 0.033; OR = 2.61), the duration of symptoms (p = 0.028; OR = 1.02), and the length of the intussusception (p = 0.014; OR = 1.265) were identified as independent risk factors for surgical treatmentNA
Kamffer et al., 2025 [24]South AfricaRetrospective cohort study110 (73—attempts air enema, 37—primarily surgically managed), NA, Mdn 7 mthIleocolicIn three of the patients who were part of the unsuccessful group, a pathological lead point was found, including Meckel’s diverticulum and Wauch’s syndromeCRP, white cell countsBlood testsAt diagnosisIdentification of factors associated with fluoroscopy-guided air enema reduction outcomes in pediatric intussusceptionAir enema, surgeryUnsuccessful fluoroscopy-guided air enema was significantly associated with younger age (p = 0.0249), dehydration (p = 0.0299), ascites (p = 0.0172), and increased outer wall intussusception diameter on ultrasound (p = 0.0026). No predictive value of elevated levels of CRP and white cell counts regarding the success of pneumatic reduction (p > 0.05)NA
Liu et al., 2025 [25]ChinaRetrospective cohort study574 (469—air enema success group, 105—air enema failure group), 396:178, mean 22.13 mthIleocolicIdiopathicWBC, absolute neutrophil, absolute lymphocyte, absolute monocyte, platelet counts, SII, SIRI, NLR, PLR, PNR, LMRBlood testsPre-treatmentIdentification of SII as a predictor of air enema failureAir enema, surgeryThreshold analysis revealed that, to the right of this inflection point (332.3), there was a significant 25% increase in the risk of air enema treatment failure for ICI per 100-unit increase in the SII (OR 1.25). In the ROC curve analysis, SII demonstrated the highest AUC of 0.8665 compared to other inflammation indicesThe critical point for SII was estimated to be 721.5 (sensitivity, 86.67%; specificity, 71.00%)
Xu et al., 2025 [26]ChinaRetrospective cohort study87 (23—intestinal necrosis group, 64—control group), 58:29, NA NANANLR, CRPAutomatic blood analyzer Pre-treatment Investigation of the risk factors of intestinal necrosis in children with intussusceptionAir enema, surgeryNLRs were all higher in the bowel necrosis group (p < 0.05). The logistic regression analysis indicated that roundness (×100) (OR = 1.397) and blood flow signal (<grade 4) (OR = 0.099) were independent predictors of bowel necrosis in intussusceptionNA
Elhadidi et al., 2025 [27]EgyptRetrospective cohort study100 (60—nonresection group, 40—resection group), 46:54, 13.29 ± 11.31 8.4 ± 4.09 mthNANACBC, albumin, CRP, NLR, PLR, LCR, CARBlood testsPre-treatment The effectiveness of different combinations of inflammatory markers in predicting intestinal necrosis and the need for intestinal resection in cases of intussusceptionSurgeryA statistically significantly higher mean CAR was observed among cases with resection. Conversely, the mean LCR was significantly lower in the resection group. CAR was a statistically significant predictor of the need for resection, with each unit increase in CAR increasing the risk by 1.42LCR—cutoff point of 0.1233 (sensitivity of 85.7% and specificity of 90%), CAR—cutoff point of 7.73 (sensitivity of 92.6% and specificity of 90%). If a patient’s CAR exceeds 7.73 and if LCR is below 0.1233, they are more likely to need surgery due to necrosis
Ulusoy et al., 2025 [28]TurkeyProspective case–control78 (52—intussusception group, 26—control group), 47:31, 24 mthIleocolicNAAlpha-GST, I-FABP, inflammatory markers ELISA, blood testsPre-treatment Alpha-glutathione S-transferase (alpha-GST), intestinal fatty-acid-binding protein (I-FABP), and inflammatory markers may predict spontaneous reduction in ileocolic intussusceptionsHydrostatic reduction, surgeryAlpha-GST, NLR, and CRP levels were significantly higher in the group requiring intervention than in the spontaneous reduction groupAlpha-GST: 3.29 ng/mL (AUC: 0.917, sensitivity: 88.9%, specificity: 85.7%), CRP: 5.5 ng/mL (AUC: 0.808, sensitivity: 64.3%, specificity: 85.7%), NLR: 1.87 (AUC: 0.739, sensitivity: 75.0%, specificity: 71.4%)
Chang et al., 2025 [29]TaiwanRetrospective cohort study11,111, 5348:3252, 0–3 years group—7562 cases (1.0 ± 1.0 yrs)/3–18 years group—3485 cases (8.8 ± 4.6 yrs)NANASodium, potassiumBlood tests24 h before or on the day of diagnosisQuantification of the association between dysnatremia and dyskalemia at presentation and major surgical complications in children with intussusceptionAir or contrast enema, surgeryElectrolyte disturbances were prevalent: hyponatremia (9.3%), hypernatremia (1.8%), hypokalemia (4.7%), and hyperkalemia (2.8%).
After adjustment, hypernatremia demonstrated the most potent association across all outcomes. Hyponatremia was independently associated with all three surgical outcomes, with more modest effect sizes (open reduction, bowel perforation or resection, peritonitis or sepsis)
Hyponatremia < 135 mmol/L, hypernatremia > 145 mmol/L, hypokalemia < 3.5 mmol/L, hyperkalemia > 5.0 mmol/L
Tuşat & Memiş, 2025 [30]TurkeyRetrospective cohort study78 (30—surgical group, 48—non-surgical group), 49:29, Mdn 19 mthSurgical group: ileoileal (n = 3), ileocolic (n = 27) NACBC, NLR, PLR, HALP scoreBlood testsPre-treatmentDetermination of whether the HALP score and the inflammatory markers scores differ between cases requiring surgical reduction and those not requiring surgical reduction in patients diagnosed with intussusceptionHydrostatic reduction, surgeryHigher NLR and PLR, lower HALP scores associated with surgical cases (p < 0.0001). However, no statistically significant difference was detected for CRP levels (p = 0.095)NA
Yu et al., 2024 [31]ChinaRetrospective cohort study547 (414—non-intestinal necrosis, 133—intestinal necrosis and underwent resection), 365/182, training set = 15.81 ± 23.91 mth, validation set = 17.6 ± 26.98 mthIleo-colic (n = 263), ileo-cecal (n = 117), compound/complex (n = 95), multiple (n = 2), small intestinal (n = 70)NAA series of parameters from the bloodBlood testsPre-treatmentPredicting the risk of intestinal resectionFailed air enema, intestinal resectionDuration of symptoms (OR = 1.050, p < 0.001), CRP (OR = 1.021, p = 0.004), WBCs (OR = 1.110, p < 0.001), ascites (OR = 3.781, p < 0.001)Duration of symptoms, C-reactive protein, white blood cells, and ascites were selected for inclusion in the nomogram, with a concordance index of 0.871
Xia et al., 2024 [32]ChinaRetrospective cohort study660 (442—no resection group, 218—bowel resection group), 302:140/143:65, Mdn 21.88 mth/15.73 mthLocation of intussusception: ascending colon (n = 483), transverse colon (n = 141), descending colon (n = 20), sigmoid colon (n = 16)NABlood-based biomarkersBlood testsPre-treatmentThe necessity of bowel resectionSurgeryBowel resection occurrence was linked to an extended duration of symptoms (OR = 2.14, p = 0.0015), the presence of gross bloody stool (OR = 8.98, p < 0.001), elevated C-reactive protein levels (OR = 4.79, p = 0.0072), lactate clearance rate (OR = 17.25, p < 0.001), and the intussusception location (OR = 12.65, p < 0.001)A scoring system (totaling 14.02 points) was developed from the cumulative β coefficients, with a threshold of 5.22 effectively differentiating infants requiring bowel resection, CRP > 8.0 mg/L, LCR < 0.121
Wei et al., 2024 [33]ChinaRetrospective cohort study18 (6—routine nursing group, 12—rehabilitation training group), 11:7, 5.24 ± 3.05 yrs/5.16 ± 3.14 yrsNANAGAS, MTL, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, CRP, TNF-α (serum) Radioimmunoassay, ELISAPost-treatment—after 5 days of rehabilitationEffects of different rehabilitation methods on gastrointestinal function and inflammatory factor levelsSurgery (laparoscopic), rehabilitationGAS (r = 0.490) and MTL (r = 0.714) levels were positively correlated with postoperative rehabilitation (p < 0.05). IL-2 (r = −0.782), IL-4 (r = −0.871), IL-6 (r = −0.971), IL-10 (r = −0.979), CRP (r = −0.981), and TNF-α (r = −0.921) levels were negatively correlated with postoperative rehabilitation (p < 0.05)NA
Shah et al., 2024 [34]IndiaProspective cohort study110 (reduced and not reduced group), 72:38, mean age 13.54 monthsIleocolicNACBC, CRP, blood gas analysis with serum electrolytesBlood testsAt diagnosisAssessment of the clinical and radiological predictors of success or failure of nonoperative management of intussusceptionHydrostatic reduction, surgeryElevated TLC, CRP, lactate, and low potassium were significantly associated with increased failure risk (p < 0.001)NA
Budiananti et al., 2024 [35]IndonesiaCross-sectional study36, 24:12, mean 7 mth (no intestinal necrosis), 8 mth (intestinal necrosis)NANAWBC, lymphocytes, neutrophils, platelets, albumin, CRP, PLR, CAR, NLR, LCRBlood testsAt diagnosisPrediction of intestinal ischemia and necrosisSurgerySignificantly related markers were albumin (p = 0.00; AUC 0.888), CRP (p = 0.00; AUC 0.948), CAR (p = 0.00; AUC 0.914), NLR (p = 0.032; AUC 0.714), and LCR (p < 0.001; AUC 0.906).Albumin ≤ 3.5 g/dL
CRP ≥ 3.37 mg/dL
CAR > 1
NLR > 1.2
LCR ≤ 0.9
Mu et al., 2024 [36]ChinaRetrospective cohort study28 (21—intussusception, 7—intestinal perforation), 10:18, mean 7.2 yrsIleoileal (n = 12), ileo-colonic (n = 6), jejunal-jejunal (n = 2), colo-colonic (n = 1)Associated with IgA vasculitisLeukocytes, CRP, D-dimerBlood testsAt diagnosisSurgical complications in children with IgAVConservative treatment methods, surgery Increased leukocytes were observed in 60.7% of children. CRP and D-dimer were elevated in 53.3% and 75% of children, respectively NA
Liu et al., 2024 [37]ChinaRetrospective cohort study1041 (852—successful reduction group, 189—failed reduction group, 728—training set, 313—validation set), 696:345, 33.50 ± 20.98 mth/26.55 ± 27.56 mthNANested position: right colon (n = 818), left colon (n = 223)WBC, CRPBlood testsAt diagnosis Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting the need for surgical intervention in pediatric intussusception after pneumatic reductionPneumatic reduction, surgeryLogistic regression analysis of the training set identified age, time of abdominal pain, presence or absence of hematochezia, C-reactive protein value from blood test on admission (OR 1.034, p < 0.001), and nested position indicated by B-ultrasound as independent predictors of intussusception interventionNA
Liu et al., 2024 [38]ChinaRetrospective cohort study2406 (208—recurrent intussusception group, 2198—control group), 1620:786, mean 30.12 ± 19.97 mth Excluded ileal intussusception from analysisNAWBC, CRPBlood testsPre-treatmentDevelopment and validation of a nomogram for predicting recurrent intussusception in children within 48 h after pneumatic reduction in primary intussusceptionPneumatic reductionAge, abdominal pain time, white blood cell counts (OR = 1.12), and hypersensitive C-reactive protein levels (OR = 1.16) were identified as predictors and incorporated into the nomogramNA
Mu, 2024 [39]ChinaRetrospective case–control study192 (32, 25—intussusception, 7—intestinal perforation, 160—control group), 99:93, mean 6.44 ± 2.21 yrs Ileum-ileal (n = 16), ileo-colonic (n = 6), jejunum-jejunum (n = 2), colon-colic (n = 1)Small bowel polyps (n = 2), Meckel’s diverticulum (n = 1), malrotation (n = 1)WBC, CRP, D-dimer, erythrocyte sedimentation rateBlood testsAt diagnosisA summary of the clinical features of IgAV complicated by intussusception and intestinal perforation, and explore its risk factorsEnema reduction, surgeryHigher WBC, CRP, and D-dimer levels are associated with surgical complications. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that age ≤ 7 years, GI symptoms prior to skin purpura, abdominal pain intensity, and timing of glucocorticoid treatment were independent risk factors of IgAV with intussusception and intestinal perforationWBC > 10 × 109/L
CRP > 8 mg/L
D-dimer > 0.24 mg/L
Kocaoğlu et al., 2024 [40]TurkeyCase–control study70 (36—intussusception group, 34—control group), 36:34, Mdn 34 mth/30 mthIleoileal (n = 9), ileocecal (n = 24), colocolic (n = 3)NAIMAELISAPre-treatment Determination of the sensitivity of IMA and the correlation between IMA and the severity of intestinal ischemia in intussusception casesHydrostatic
reduction, surgery
The mean IMA level of the intussusception group was 179.13 ± 220.33 ng/mL, whereas the mean level was found as 89 ± 70.9 ng/mL in the control group (p = 0.023). When the patients were categorized as ileoileal, ileocecal, and colocolic, the mean IMA levels were detected as 235.65 ± 268.14 ng/mL, 174.46 ± 212.8 ng/mL, and 46.95 ± 19.56 ng/mL, respectivelyThe sensitivity and specificity rates were determined
as 55.6% and 55.9% using a cutoff value of 60.1 ng/mL
for IMA
Yu et al., 2023 [41]ChinaRetrospective cohort study708 (613—HSP, 95—HSP with AI), HSP without AI group—357/256, Mdn 5 yrs 8 mth, HSP with AI group—56/39, Mdn 6 yrs 5 mthAccording to imaging manifestations -
ileocolic (n = 45), small intestinal (n = 37)
NATotal bile acid (serum)Blood testsPre-treatment (at diagnosis during GI symptoms)High serum TBA predicts AI; higher TBA levels were associated with increased operative treatment, intestinal necrosis, and longer hospital staysAir enema, intestinal resectionVomiting (OR = 396.492, p < 0.001), haematochezia (OR = 87.436, p = 0.001), TBA (OR = 16.287, p < 0.001), and D-dimer (OR = 5.987, p = 0.003) were independent risk factors for abdominal-type HSP with AITBA > 3 μmol/L for predicting AI in children with abdominal-type HSP, TBA ≥ 6.98 μmol/L associated with an increased incidence of operative treatment, intestinal necrosis, and length of hospital stay
Yang et al., 2023 [42]ChinaRetrospective cohort study869 (787—with no relapse, 82—recurrent intussusception), 591/278, <1 year old = 312, ≥1 year old = 557NANABlood-based biomarkersBlood testsPre-treatmentLikelihood of early recurrence of intussusception (<48 h)Enema therapy, surgeryAge (OR 7.67, p = 0.001), vomiting (OR 0.17, p < 0.001), bloody stool (OR 0.14, p = 0.01), and monocyte ratio (OR 9.52, p = 0.003) were independently associated with the clinical endpointsChildren older than 1 year in age, who lacked vomiting and bloody stool symptoms, and who exhibited an elevated ratio of monocytes, were more likely to relapse early
Zhuang et al., 2023 [43]ChinaRetrospective cohort study199 (139—training group, 60—validation group), 146:53, Location: right side (n = 145), left side (n = 54)NAWBCs, platelets, CRP, fibrinogen, CK-MB, potassium, sodium, chlorideBlood testsAt diagnosisDevelopment and validation of a nomogram for predicting surgical intervention in pediatric intussusception after hydrostatic reductionHydrostatic reduction, surgeryDuration of symptoms, bloody stools, WBCs (OR = 1.203, p = 0.026), CK-MB (OR = 1.034, p = 0.040), long-axis diameter, poor prognostic signs by ultrasound and mental state were identified as the independent predictors of surgical intervention for intussusceptionA model that incorporated the independent predictors was developed and presented as a nomogram. The C-index of the nomogram in the validation set was 0.948
Delgado-Miguel et al., 2023 [44]SpainRetrospective case–control study511 (410—effective enema group, 101—need for surgery group), 333:178, Mdn 16 mth/16.5 mthIleocolicNACBC, ionogram, glucose, urea, fibrinogen, CRPBlood testsPre-treatment Identification of predictors of the need for surgical treatment in ileocolic intussusceptionHydrostatic enema, surgical treatmentThe surgery group presented higher median laboratory inflammatory markers: NLR (6.8 vs. 1.8; p < 0.001), neutrophils (10,148 vs. 7468; p < 0.001), and CRP (28.2 vs. 4.7; p < 0.001). In ROC curve analysis, NLR had an AUC of 0.925.It was estimated that a cutoff point of NLR greater than 4.52 (sensitivity: 73.2%; specificity: 94.5%), neutrophils greater than 9420 (sensitivity: 55.4%, specificity: 82.8%), and CRP greater than 4.8 (sensitivity: 65.7%, specificity: 60.4%)
Zhang et al., 2023 [45]ChinaRetrospective cohort study624 (73—recurrence of intussusception after successful reduction with air enema), 400:224; Mdn 1.8 yrsSite of intussusception: hepatic flexure (n = 237), transverse colon (n = 184), Ileocecal junction (n = 92), ascending colon (n = 63), splenic flexure (n = 31), other (n = 17)NAWBC count, neutrophil percentage, lymphocyte Percentage, CRPBlood testsPre-treatmentInvestigation of the factors associated with in-hospital Recurrence of intussusceptionAir enema reductionMultivariate logistic regression analysis identified age > 1 year old (OR = 7.65), secondary intestinal intussusception (OR = 14.40), and mesenteric lymph node enlargement (OR = 1.90) as factors independently associated with in-hospital recurrence of intussusceptionNA
Wu et al., 2022 [46]TaiwanRetrospective observational study584, 379/205, 27.2 ± 20.3 mth Operative findings: ileocolic (n = 90), ileoileal (n = 9), ileo-ileocolic or ileo-colocolic (n = 39)38 patients had pathological lead points—Meckel diverticulum (n = 8), bands (n = 8), polyp (n = 5), enlarged lymph nodes (n = 5), lymphoid mass (n = 5), Burkitt lymphoma (n = 1), enteric duplication cyst (n = 2), Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (n = 3), and cecal serosal lesions (n = 1)Blood-based biomarkersBlood testsPre-treatmentPrediction of the need for bowel resectionEnema reduction, surgeryAbdominal pain (OR = 0.372, p = 0.013), bloody stool (OR = 3.553, p = 0.044), and hyponatremia (OR = 4.12, p = 0.003) were independent predictors for surgery. Prolonged time to surgery (OR = 6.863, p = 0.009), long intussusception (OR = 5.088, p = 0.014), pathological lead point (OR = 6.926, p = 0.003), and ICU admission (OR = 11.777, p = 0.001) were associated with bowel resectionHyponatremia (<135 mEq/L), hypochloremia (≤100 mEq/L), hyperglycemia (≥100 mg/dL)
Liu et al., 2022 [47]ChinaRetrospective cohort study8235 (5743—hydraulic enema group (HE), 2492—surgical group (SM)/398—with necrosis subgroup (SN+), 2094—without necrosis subgroup (SN−)), 3986:1757/1690:802, 1.54 ± 0.02 yrs/1.17 ± 0.04 yrsNANA74 clinical and biochemical parametersBlood testsPre-treatmentLikelihood of successful reduction with an enema versus the need for surgery.
Likelihood of intestinal necrosis.
Hydrostatic reduction, surgery (+/− resection)The prediction model composed of seven variables (NEUT#, platelet, albumin, β-2MG macroglobulin, glucose, uric acid, and chlorine was suitable for HE/SM. The prediction model composed of six variables (NEUT#, average hemoglobin concentration, PLT, the total protein, CRP, and urea) was suitable for SN−/SN+NA
Zhu et al., 2022 [48]ChinaRetrospective observational study412 (375—nonrecurring cases, 37—cases of short-term recurrence), 293:119, NAMass location: ascending colon (n = 280), transverse colon (n = 132)NAMCP-1, IL-6ELISAPre-treatment Evaluation of the relationship between the expression level of MCP-1 in peripheral blood and the short-term recurrence of primary intussusception in childrenHydrostatic reductionLogistic regression analysis found that increased MCP-1 was a risk factor for recurrenceROC showed that 23.24 ng/mL was used as a cutoff value (sensitivity—82.14%, specificity—75.67%)
Zhao et al., 2021 [49]ChinaCross-sectional study40 (intussusception—20/healthy controls—20), 10:10/12:8, 30.97 ± 34.94 mth/35.21 ± 40.78 mthIleum colon (n = 16), ileum cecum (n = 2), ileum ileum (n = 2),Predominantly idiopathic; some cases with lead points (e.g., duplication)Transfer ribonucleic acid (tRNA)-derived fragments (tRFs) (serum)qRT-PCRImmediately after the final diagnosis by air enema, before reductionComparison of groups, focus on diagnosis rather than prognosisAair enema (n = 18), surgery (n = 2)tRF-Leu-TAA-006 (0.984, p < 0.05), tRF-Gln-TTG-033 (0.970, p < 0.05), tRF-Lys-TTT-028 (0.837, p < 0.05) correlated with diagnosistRFs with AUC > 0.5, p < 0.05 were considered appropriate biomarkers
Huang et al., 2021 [50]ChinaRetrospective Cohort study540 (113—intestinal necrosis group, 427—non-intestinal necrosis groups), 355:185, Mdn 5.23/7.52NAMost cases are idiopathic; 37 cases had pathological lead pointsFibrinogen, paletets, D-dimerBlood testsPre-treatmentDetermination of the risk factors for intestinal necrosis among children with failed non-surgical reduction for intussusceptionSurgeryMultivariable analysis revealed that duration of symptom (OR 1.12, p = 0.000), fibrinogen (OR 1.26, p = 0.010) and D-dimer (OR 2.07, p = 0.000) independently predicted intestinal necrosis in individuals undergoing surgical reduction for intussusception Intestinal
necrosis in intussusception patients was more likely with D-dimer
levels > 1.005 mg/L
Hou et al., 2021 [51]ChinaRetrospective cohort study564 (132—overweight and obesity group, 432—no overweight and obesity group), 405:159, <24 mth = 353, >24 mth = 211) IleocolicIdiopathic (patients with identified lead points were excluded)WBC, CRPBlood testsPre-treatmentComparison of clinical outcomes after primary air enema reduction for intussusception in grouped overweight and obese (body mass index-for-age percentile ≥ 85) pediatric patients compared with non-overweight and obese patientsPneumatic reduction, surgical reductionAfter multivariate logistic regression analysis, overweight and obesity (OR = 8.045) and WBC count ≥ 20 × 109/L were risk factors for both surgical reduction (OR = 6.151) and the recurrence (OR = 3.357) of intussusceptionWBC count ≥ 20 × 109/L (predefined threshold)
Chen et al., 2021 [52]ChinaRetrospective cohort study115 (47—underwent intestinal resection, 68—did not undergo intestinal resection), NA, 1.79 ± 0.88 yrs/1.87 ± 0.92 yrsNANANeutrophils, platelets, CRP, lymphocytes, albuminBlood testsPre-treatment (within 2 days prior to surgery)Investigation of the value of various combinations of inflammatory factors to predict intestinal necrosis and resectionSurgeryA combination of lymphocytic count along with C-reactive protein levels demonstrated the highest correlation with intestinal resection due to intussusception compared with other parameters in the patients, with a sensitivity of 0.82 and specificity of 0.80 for the diagnosis of strangulationCRP > 11.26, albumin > 29.4, PLR > 188.5, LCR < 0.121, NLR > 5.72, CAR = 0.286
Zhao et al., 2021 [53]ChinaRetrospective case–control study160 (60—children with HSP, 100—control group), 71:89, mean 6.6 ± 2 yrsSurgery: small bowel intussusception (n = 29), ileocolic (n = 19)NAWBC count, neutrophil count, platelet count, CRP, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, D-dimer Blood testsPre-treatment Investigation of the risk factors for intussusception in children with Henoch–Schönlein purpuraAir enema reduction, surgeryUnivariate and multiple regression analyses revealed age at onset, not receiving glucocorticoid therapy within 72 h of emergence of GI symptoms, hematochezia, and increased D-dimer levels (OR = 7.193) as independent risk factors for intussusception in children with HSP (p < 0.05)D-dimer levels ≥ 1 mg/L
Younes et al., 2021 [54]South KoreaRetrospective cohort study145 (124—pneumatic reduction, 21—surgical reduction), 95:50, mean 24.6 ± 15.2 mthIleocolicIdiopathicWBC with differential, hemoglobin, and CRPBlood testsAt diagnosisIdentification of factors that can lead to pneumatic reduction failure in children with ileocolic intussusceptionPneumatic reduction, surgeryMultivariate analysis showed that a high segmented neutrophil count, low hemoglobin level, and higher weight percentile were significantly associated with pneumatic reduction failureSegmented neutrophil > 67.3%
hemoglobin < 12.2 g/dL
Lee et al., 2020 [55]South KoreaRetrospective cohort study249 (199—good outcome group, 50—poor outcome group/intussusception recurrence or required surgical reductions), 159:90, Mdn 1.8 yrsIleocolicIdiopathicpH, lactic acid, bicarbonateVenous blood gas analysisAt diagnosisDetermination of whether lactic acid levels are associated with pediatric intussusception outcomesAir enema, surgeryThe poor and good outcome groups showed significant differences in their respective blood gas analyses for pH (7.39 vs. 7.41, p = 0.001), lactic acid (1.70 vs. 1.30 mmol/L, p < 0.001), and bicarbonate (20.70 vs. 21.80 mmol/L, p = 0.036). Multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that pH (OR 0.000, p = 0.003) and lactic acid (OR 3.066, p < 0.001) levels were the two factors significantly associated with poor outcomes.When the lactic acid level cutoff values were ≥1.5, ≥2.0, ≥2.5, and ≥3.0 mmol/L, the positive predictive values for poor outcomes were 30.0, 34.6, 50.0, and 88.9%, respectively
Zhu et al., 2019 [56]ChinaRetrospective cohort study60 (acute intussusception—30/indirect inguinal hernia, control group—30), 18:12/20:10, 1.2 ± 0.6 yrs/1.3 ± 0.5 yrsNANAVasoactive intestinal peptide, substance P (serum)ELISAPre-treatment and 1, 2, and 4 weeks post-treatmentComparison of groups, monitoring of biomarkers over time after treatmentAir enema (symptoms < 48 h, n = 27), surgery (abdominal distension and peritonitis, or those younger than 3 months, n = 3)In a comparison of groups, the intussusception group had significantly lower serum VIP levels before treatment and significantly higher SP levels. After treatment, VIP levels gradually increased, and SP levels decreased (p < 0.05)NA
Xiaolong et al., 2019 [57]ChinaRetrospective cohort study621 (62—failed group, 559—successful group), 2:1, Mdn 22 mthFailed group: ileocolic (n = 58), ileoileocolic (n = 4)Failed group: idiopathic (n = 39), polyp (n = 5), Meckel (n = 17), angioma (n = 1) White blood cell counts, neutrophils, and electrolytesBlood testsPre-treatment Exploration of the risk factors associated with the failure of hydrostatic reductionHydrostatic reduction, surgerySignificant risk factors for failure of hydrostatic reduction in intussusception were an age of under 1-year old (OR = 3.915), duration of symptoms more than or equal to 48 h (OR = 0.056), rectal bleeding (OR = 0.283), constipation (OR = 0.086), palpable abdominal mass (OR = 0.370), and location of mass (left over right side) (OR = 13.782)NA
Lee et al., 2019 [58]South KoreaRetrospective cohort study137 (23—recurrent intussusception), 80:57, mean 2.17 ± 1.36 yrs Ileocolic (n = 136), small bowel type (n = 1) No specific anatomical lead points were identified during surgical reductionWBC, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP, albuminBlood testsAt diagnosisIdentification of factors related to the recurrence of intussusception in pediatric patientsEnema reduction, surgeryPatients in the recurrence group had higher levels of CRP (2.68 ± 1.49 mg/dL vs. 1.49 ± 1.03 mg/dL, p = 0.024). On regression analysis, age > 1 year at the time of presentation (OR = 4.79) and no history of infection (OR = 0.18) were retained as predictors of recurrenceCRP > 0.5 mg/dL
Ademuyiwa et al., 2018 [59]NigeriaProspective study75 (25—with necrotic bowel, 25—without bowel necrosis, 25—controls), 51:24, 7 ± 3.16 mthNAIdiopathicIntestinal fatty-acid-binding protein (serum)ELISAPre-treatment Likelihood of bowel resection due to necrosisSurgery (intestinal resection)Twenty-five children were diagnosed with necrotic intussusception whose serum I-FABP immunoassay has significantly higher median compared with those without necrosis and controls (2056 ng/mL vs. 943 ng/mL and 478 ng/mL, p = 0.0002). Length of necrosed bowel correlates with I-FABP levels (r = 0.62)Using a cutoff value of 1538 ng/mL, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 64%, 88%, 84%, and 71%, respectively. I-FABP titer greater than 1538 ng/mL was found to have a higher likelihood of necrotic bowel (OR = 13.04, p = 0.002)
Lim et al., 2018 [60]MalaysiaRetrospective observational study172, 107:65, Mdn 2.2 yrsNAFailed USGHR group: lymphoma (n = 3), neuroendocrine tumor of
the appendix (n = 1), Meckel’s diverticulum (n = 1), Henoch–Schönlein purpura hamartoma (n = 1), enteric duplication cyst (n = 1)
Hemoglobin, platelet count, and leukocytesBlood testsPre-treatment Examination of the experience and factors associated with the success or failure of ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction using waterUSGHR, surgeryAge more than 3 years old (OR = 7.16), anemia (OR = 10.12), thrombocytosis (OR = 11.21), ultrasound findings of free fluid (OR = 9.39), and left-sided intussusception (OR = 8.18) were independently associated with USGHR irreducibilityNA
Tamas et al., 2017 [61]USAProspective cohort study39 (16—intussusception), 27:12, mean 25/20 mthNANALactic acidVITROS LAC slide methodPre-treatmentEvaluation of lactic acid levels to determine if they can predict the presence of intussusceptionEnema reductionMean (± standard deviation) lactic acid levels were not significantly different between children with suspected (1.7 ± 0.69 mmol/L) and confirmed intussusception (1.93 ± 1.13 mmol/L) (p = 0.29)NA
Carapinha et al., 2016 [62]South AfricaProspective observational study97, NA, between 3 mths and 3
yrs
NAIdiopathicCRPLatex immunoassayPre-treatment Determination of the impact of revised protocols to better select patients for pneumatic reduction, documentation of the associated morbidity and mortality, and the factors that affect the abovePneumatic reduction, surgeryProlonged duration of symptoms and a raised CRP level predicted a poor outcome. A raised CRP is predictive of failure of pneumatic reduction (OR = 1.01, p = 0.043) and relook laparotomy (OR = 1.01, p = 0.025) NA
Karabulut et al., 2010 [63]TurkeyCase–control study42 (22—study group, 20—control group), 28:14, mean 13 ± 5.66 mth/12.6 ± 5.1 mthIleocolicIdiopathicHemoglobin, WBC, IL-6, CRP, BUN Human IL-6 assay, blood tests At diagnosisDetermination of the role of inflammation related to body mass index and atopy in the etiology of idiopathic intussusceptionEnema reduction, surgeryWhen binary logistic regression analysis with the cutoff value of IL-6 set as 1.6 pg/mL was applied to all data, statistically significant values were obtained only when the case was in the study group and when CRP levels were increasedIL-6 = 1.6 pg/mL
Fragoso et al., 2007 [64]PortugalCross-sectional study164, 122:42, mean 11.6 ± 10.7 mthNANAWBC, neutrophils (%)Blood testsAt diagnosisDetermination of risk factors and design and evaluation of a predictive model of air enema failurePneumatic reduction, manual reductionMultivariable analysis adjusted for age and sex revealed that delayed diagnosis (evolution > 24 h) (OR = 11.52) and raised neutrophils (%) (OR = 1.06) were associated with failureThe area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.826. At the best cutoff (0.15), the positive predictive value was 35% and the negative 93%. At the cutoff of 0.50, the positive predictive value was 70% and the negative 87%; the sensitivity was 29%
Willetts et al., 2001 [65]United KingdomProspective observational study32, 23:9, Mdn 4 mthIleocolicNAMalondialdehyde, CRP, IL 6, neopterin, tumor necrosis factor alpha, endotoxin, Ig G, and IgM EndoCAbELISA, HPLC, immunoturbidimetric assay, colorimetric assaypre-treatment Investigation of selected inflammatory mediators in children with acute intussusception and to identify potentially useful plasma markers of clinical outcomeAir enema reduction, surgeryAcute levels of plasma IL-6, neopterin and CRP were significantly raised in comparison to both normal laboratory ranges and convalescent samples. Using stepwise discriminant analysis, CRP was identified as the best variable at distinguishingNA
McDermott et al., 1994 [66]ScotlandRetrospective cohort study54, 32:22, 12.5 mthSurgical findings: ileo-ileo-colic (n = 2), ileoileal (n = 1), ileocolic (n = 3)Meckel diverticulum (n = 2), pinworm (n = 1)WBCBlood testsPre-treatmentSuccess or failure of the air
enema
Air enema, surgeryThe mean leucocytosis was 14,635/cubic centimeter (cc), and of the three patients with a white cell count greater than 20 000/cc, only one needed surgery. Among
patients with failed reduction, leucocytosis was present in
64% (9/14)
NA
Frey & Kistler, 1994 [67]SwitzerlandRetrospective and prospective case–control study38 (15—idiopathic intussusception group, 23 control group), NA, 9.5 ± 9.5 mth/13.5 ± 7 mthOrigin in the ileumIdiopathicLeucocytes, lymphocytes, reactive lymphocytesBlood smearsAt diagnosisInvestigation of whether the presence of reactive lymphocytes may guide careful supervision in atypical cases lacking classic clinical signsSurgeryIncreased absolute number of reactive lymphocytes in the infants with intussusception compared to the controls (0.14 × 109/1 ± 0.08 and 0.07 × 109/L ± 0.07, respectively)NA
Reijnen et al., 1990 [68]NetherlandsRetrospective cohort study130—group A (n = 65)—hydrostatic reduction, group B (n = 36)—laparotomy after hydrostatic reduction had failed, group C (n = 21)—primary laparotomy, group D (n = 8)—bowel resection, 90:40, from 1 day to 14.3 yrsColonic components to their intussusceptionsNAWBCBlood testsAt diagnosisPrediction of failure of hydrostatic reductionHydrostatic reduction, surgeryRectal bleeding and duration of symptoms of more than 48 h contributed significantly to the prediction of failure of hydrostatic reduction. WBC > 20 × 109/L associated with intestinal resection in univariate analysis (p = 0.03).WBC > 20 × 109/L (mentioned but not central to the main predictive model)—group A compared with groups B, C, and D
ELISA—enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, VIP—vasoactive intestinal peptide, SP—substance P, tRNA—transfer ribonucleic acid, tRFs—transfer ribonucleic acid-derived fragments, qRT-PCR—quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, yrs—years, mth—month, OR—odds ratio, WBC—white blood cells, CRP—C-reactive protein, TBA—total bile acid, HSP—Henoch–Schonlein purpura, AI—acute intussusception, ROC—receiver operating characteristic, Mdn—median, ICU—intensive care unit, GAS—gastrin, MTL—motilin, IL—interleukin, TNF-α—tumor necrosis factor-α, ESR—erythrocyte sedimentation rate, TLC—total leukocyte counts, CBC—complete blood count. PLR—platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, CAR—C-reactive protein/albumin ratio, NLR—neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, LCR—lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio, IgAV—IgA vasculitis, CK-MB—creatine kinase-MB, I-FABP—intestinal fatty-acid-binding protein, SII—systemic immune inflammatory index, SIRI—systemic inflammation response index, PNR—platelet-to-neutrophil ratio, LMR—lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, alpha-GST—alpha-glutathione S-transferase, Na—sodium, K—potassium, USGHR—ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction, Ig—immunoglobulin, EndoCAb—antiendotoxin core antibody, HPLC—High-Performance Liquid Chromatography, MCP-1—monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, IMA—ischemia-modified albumin, BUN—blood urea nitrogen.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jurković, K.; Pehar, K.; Jurić, D.; Bašković, M. Predictive and Prognostic Biomarkers in Pediatric Intussusception—A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15, 3114. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15083114

AMA Style

Jurković K, Pehar K, Jurić D, Bašković M. Predictive and Prognostic Biomarkers in Pediatric Intussusception—A Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2026; 15(8):3114. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15083114

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jurković, Kristina, Karla Pehar, Danijela Jurić, and Marko Bašković. 2026. "Predictive and Prognostic Biomarkers in Pediatric Intussusception—A Systematic Review" Journal of Clinical Medicine 15, no. 8: 3114. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15083114

APA Style

Jurković, K., Pehar, K., Jurić, D., & Bašković, M. (2026). Predictive and Prognostic Biomarkers in Pediatric Intussusception—A Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 15(8), 3114. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15083114

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop