Zona Pellucida Dynamics Integrate Biochemical and Clinical Indicators of Embryo Competence
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design, Setting, and Participants
2.2. Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation
2.3. Embryological Procedures, Embryo Transfer and Clinical Outcomes
2.4. Sample Collection and Biomarker Assays
2.5. Time-Lapse Imaging and ZP Measurements
2.5.1. Relative Thinning Ratio (Δrel)
2.5.2. Linear Thinning Rate (Slope)
2.6. Outcomes
2.7. Statistical Analysis
2.7.1. Data Handling and Simple Statistical Tests
2.7.2. Logistic Regression Models
2.7.3. PCA and Non-Linear Effects
2.7.4. CCA and Permutation Testing
2.7.5. Analyses for Clinical Interpretability
3. Results
3.1. Zona Pellucida Dynamics and Spontaneous Hatching (Embryo-Level)
3.1.1. Logistic Regression and Model Performance
3.1.2. PCA and Non-Linear Structure
3.1.3. CCA and Permutation Testing at Embryo-Level
3.2. Zona Pellucida Dynamics and Clinical Pregnancy (Patient-Level)
3.2.1. Logistic Regression Analysis of Clinical Pregnancy
3.2.2. PCA of Clinical Pregnancy Outcomes
3.2.3. CCA and Clinical Covariates at Patient-Level
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| ANOVA | Analysis of variance |
| AUC | Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve |
| BMI | Body mass index |
| BMP-15 | Bone morphogenetic protein-15 |
| CCA | Canonical correspondence analysis |
| CI | Confidence interval |
| EDF | Estimated degrees of freedom |
| ELISA | Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay |
| E2 | Estradiol |
| FF | Follicular fluid |
| FSH | Follicle-stimulating hormone |
| GAM | Generalized additive model |
| GDF-9 | Growth differentiation factor-9 |
| HA | Hyaluronic acid |
| Intercept (Constant) | Baseline odds at mean predictor levels in logistic regression |
| IU | International unit |
| MII | Metaphase II oocyte |
| OR | Odds ratio |
| PCA | Principal component analysis |
| PC1/PC2 | Principal component 1/2 |
| R2 | proportion of variance explained Pseudo-R2 (CCA): proportion of constrained inertia/total inertia Adjusted R2 (CCA): bias-corrected explained variance (vegan::RsquareAdj) |
| Ref.df | Reference degrees of freedom (for GAM smooth terms) |
| ROC | Receiver operating characteristic |
| SD | Standard deviation |
| Slope | Linear thinning rate of the zona pellucida across time-lapse |
| Syn4 | Syndecan-4 |
| ZP | Zona pellucida |
| Δrel | Relative thinning ratio of the zona pellucida |
References
- Carson, D.D.; Bachi, I.; Dey, S.; Enders, A.C.; Fazleabas, A.T.; Lessey, B.A.; Yoshinaga, K. Embryo Implantation. Dev. Biol. 2000, 223, 217–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Nuaim, L.A.; Jenkins, J.M. Assisted hatching in assisted reproduction. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2002, 109, 856–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sathanantan, H.; Menezes, J.; Gunasheela, S. Mechanics of human blastocyst hatching in vitro. Reprod. Biol. Med. Online 2003, 7, 228–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seshagiri, P.B.; Vani, V.; Madhulika, P. Cytokines and blastocyst hatching. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2016, 75, 208–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leonavicius, K.; Royer, C.; Preece, C.; Davies, J.S.; Srinivas, S. Mechanics of mouse blastocyst hatching revealed by a hydrogel-based microdeformation assay. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 10375–10380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, S.K. The human egg’s zona pellucida. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2018, 130, 379–411. [Google Scholar]
- Bhakta, H.H.; Refai, F.H.; Avella, M.A. The molecular mechanism mediating fertilization. Development 2019, 146, dev176966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moros-Nicolás, C.; Chevret, P.; Jimenez-Movilla, M.; Algarra, B.; Costa-Rodrigez, P.; Gonzalez-Brusi, L.; Avilés, M.; Izguierdo-Rico, Y. New insights into the mammalian egg zona pellucida. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wassarman, P.M. Zona pellucida glycoproteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 24285–24289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gupta, S.K. Role of zona pellucida glycoproteins during fertilization in humans. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2015, 108, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Männikkö, M.; Törmälä, R.M.; Tuuri, T.; Haltia, A.; Martikainen, H.; Ala-Kokko, L.; Tapanainen, J.S.; Lakkakorpi, J.T. Association between sequence variations in genes encoding human zona pellucida glycoproteins and fertilization failure in IVF. Hum. Reprod. 2005, 20, 1578–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pökkyla, R.M.; Lakkakorpi, J.T.; Nuojua-Huttunen, S.H.; Tapanainen, J.S. Sequence variations in human ZP genes as potential modifiers of zona pellucida architecture. Fertil. Steril. 2011, 95, 2669–2672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sauerbrun-Cutler, M.-T.; Vega, M.; Breborowicz, A.; Gonzales, E.; Stein, D.; Lederman, M.; Keltz, M. Oocyte zona pellucida dysmorphology is associated with diminished in-vitro fertilization success. J. Ovarian Res. 2015, 8, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shivers, C.A.; Dunbar, B.S. Autoantibodies to zona pellucida: A possible cause for infertility in women. Science 1977, 197, 1082–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nishimoto, T.; Mori, T.; Yamada, I.; Nishimura, T. Autoantibodies to zona pellucida in infertile and aged women. Fertil. Steril. 1980, 34, 552–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nayudu, P.L.; Freemann, I.E.; Trounson, A.O. Zona pellucida antibodies in human sera. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1982, 65, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papale, M.L.; Grillo, A.; Leonardi, E.; Giuffrida, M.; Palumbo, M.; Palumbo, G. Assessment of the relevance of zona pellucida antibodies in follicular fluid of in- vitro fertilization (IVF) patients. Hum. Reprod. 1999, 9, 1827–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertrand, E.; Van den Bergh Englert, Y. Does zona pellucida thickness influence the fertilization rate? Hum. Reprod. 1995, 10, 1189–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roller, R.J.; Kinloch, R.A.; Hiraoka, B.Y.; Li, S.S.; Wassarman, P.M. Gene expression during mammalian oogenesis and early embryogenesis: Quantification of three messenger RNAs abundant in fully grown mouse oocytes. Development 1989, 106, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cohen, S. Assisted hatching of human embryos. J. Vitr. Fertil. Embryo Transf. 1991, 8, 179–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, J.; Elsner, C.; Kort, H.; Malter, H.; Massey, J.; Mayer, M.P.; Wiemer, K. Impairment of the hatching process following IVF in human and improvement of implantation by assisting hatching using micromanipulation. Hum. Reprod. 1990, 5, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, J.; Inge, K.L.; Suzman, M.; Wiker, S.R.; Wright, G. Videocinematography of fresh and cryopreserved embryos: A retrospective analysis of embryonic morphology and implantation. Fertil. Steril. 1989, 51, 820–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chan, P.J. Developmental potential of human oocytes according to zona pellucida thickness. J. Vitr. Fertil. Embryo Transf. 1987, 4, 232–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Janssens, R.; Carle, M.; DeClerck, E.; Hendrix, P.; Laurier, K.; Nagy, Z.P.; Janssenswillen, C.; Strassen, C.; Van Steirteghem, A. Can zona pellucida thickness predict the implantation rate? Hum. Reprod. 1994, 9, 78–79. [Google Scholar]
- Tucker, M.J.; Luecke, N.M.; Wilker, S.R.; Wright, G. Chemical removal of the outside of the zona pellucida of day 3 human embryos has no impact on implantation rate. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 1993, 10, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tucker, M.J.; Wilker, S.R.; Kort, H.J. Embryonal zona pellucida thinning and uterine transfer. Assist. Reprod. Rev. J. 1993, 3, 168–171. [Google Scholar]
- R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology; Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. The role of assisted hatching in in vitro fertilization: A review of the literature. A Committee opinion. Fertil. Steril. 2008, 90, S196–S198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dayal, M.B.; Dubey, A.; Frankfurter, D.; Peak, D.; Gindoff, P.R. Second cycle: To hatch or not to hatch? Fertil. Steril. 2007, 88, 718–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stein, A.; Rufas, O.; Amit, S.; Avrech, O.; Pinkas, H.; Ovadia, J.; Fisch, B. Assisted hatching by partial zona dissection of human pre-embryo in patients with recurrent implantation failure after in vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril. 1995, 63, 838–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tucker, M.; Morton, P.; Wright, G.; Ingargiola, P.; Sweitzer, C.; Elsner, C.; Mitchell-Leef, D.; Massey, J. Infertility: Enhancement of outcome from intracytoplasmic sperm injection: Does co-culture or assisted hatching improve im-plantation rates? Hum. Reprod. 1996, 11, 2434–2437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lass, A.; Coucher, C.; Duffy, S. 1000 initiated cycles of in-vitro fertilization in women of 40 years old or more. Hum. Reprod. 1998, 70, 1030–1034. [Google Scholar]
- Hammadeh, M.E.; Fischer-Hammadeh, C.; Ali, K.R. Assisted hatching in assisted reproduction: A state of the art. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2011, 28, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butts, S.F.; Oven, C.; Mainig, M.; Senapati, S.; Seifer, D.B.; Dokras, A. Assisted hatching and intracytoplasmic sperm injection are not associated with improved outcome in ART cycles for diminished ovarian reserve: An analysis of US cycles from 2004-2011. Fertil. Steril. 2014, 102, 1041–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Vos, A.; Van Steirteghem, A. Zona hardening, zona drilling and assisted hatching: New achievements in assisted reproduction. Cells Tissues Organs 2000, 166, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antinori, S.; Selman, H.A.; Caffa, B.; Pancí, C.; Dani, G.L.; Versaci, C. Zona opening of human embryos using a non-contact UV laser for assisted hatching in patients with poor prognosis of pregnancy. Hum. Reprod. 1996, 11, 2488–2492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magli, M.C.; Gianaroli, L.; Ferraretti, A.P.; Fortini, D.; Aicardi, G.; Montanaro, N. Rescue of implantation potential in embryos with poor prognosis by assisted zona hatching. Hum. Reprod. 1998, 13, 1331–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sallam, H.N.; Sadek, S.; Agameya, A. Assisted hatching-a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2003, 20, 332–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Persani, R.; Rossetti, R.; Di Pasquale, E.; Cacciatore, C.; Fabre, S. The fundamental role of bone morphogenetic protein 15 in ovarian function and its involvement in female fertility disorders. Hum. Reprod. Update 2014, 20, 869–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dong, J.; Albertini, D.F.; Nishimori, K.; Kumar, T.R.; Lu, T.N.; Matzu, K. Growth differential factor-9 is required during early ovarian folliculogenesis. Nature 1996, 383, 531–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Li, A.Q.; Ou, S.-B.; Zhang, N.-F.; Ren, L.; Wei, L.-N.; Zhang, Q.-X.; Yang, D.-Z. Increased GDF9 and BMP15 mRNA levels in cumulus granulosa cells correlate with oocyte maturation, fertilization, and embryo growth in humans. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2014, 12, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Patino, L.C.; Walton, K.L.; Mueller, T.D.; Johnson, K.E.; Stocker, W.; Richani, D.; Agapiou, D.; Gilchrisi, R.B.; Laissue, P.; Harrison, C.A. BMP15 mutations associated with primary ovarian insufficiency reduce expression, activity, or synergy with GDF9. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2017, 102, 1009–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rossetti, R.; Ferrari, I.; Bestetti, I.; Moleri, S.; Brancati, F.; Petrone, L.; Finelli, P.; Persani, L. Fundamental role of BMP15 in human folliculogenesis revealed by null and missense mutations associated with primary ovarian insufficiency. Hum. Mutat. 2020, 41, 983–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Russell, D.L.; Robker, R.L. Molecular mechanisms of ovulation: Co-ordination through the cumulus complex. Hum. Reprod. Update 2007, 13, 289–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gui, L.-M.; Joyce, I.M. RNA interference evidence that growth differentiation factor-9 mediates oocyte regulation of cumulus expansion in mice. Biol. Reprod. 2005, 72, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kokia, E.; Hurwitz, A.; Ben-Shlomo, I.; Adashi, E.; Yanagishita, M. Receptor-mediated stimulatory effect of IL-1 beta on hyaluronic acid and proteoglycan biosynthesis by cultured rat ovarian cells: Role for heterologous cell-cell interactions. Endocrinology 1993, 133, 2391–2394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Watson, L.N.; Mottershead, D.G.; Dunning, K.R.; Robker, R.L.; Gilchrist, R.B.; Russell, D.L. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans regulate responses to oocyte paracrine signals in ovarian follicle morphogenesis. Endocrinology 2012, 153, 4544–4555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]




| Variable | Hatching (Mean ± SD) | No Hatching (Mean ± SD) | p-Value | Pregnant Mean ± SD | Not Pregnant Mean ± SD | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 23 | 41 | - | 14 | 33 | - |
| Relative zona pellucida thinning (Δrel, mean) | 0.78 ± 0.16 | 0.28 ± 0.27 | <0.001 * | 0.61 ± 0.33 | 0.34 ± 0.30 | 0.0219 * |
| Zona pellucida thinning slope (mean) | −0.08 ± 0.02 | −0.03 ± 0.04 | <0.001 * | −0.08 ± 0.04 | −0.03 ± 0.03 | 0.0025 * |
| Serum Syn4 (ng/mL) | 8.82 ± 2.74 | 7.97 ± 2.32 | 0.3997 | 8.06 ± 2.45 | 8.26 ± 2.46 | 0.8169 |
| Follicular fluid Syn4 (ng/mL) | 7.40 ± 2.28 | 8.34 ± 3.39 | 0.2941 | 7.25 ± 2.17 | 8.46 ± 3.45 | 0.1574 |
| Serum GDF-9 (pg/mL) | 247.90 ± 112.04 | 189.53 ± 108.57 | 0.1738 | 232.93 ± 126.93 | 191.95 ± 103.02 | 0.3403 |
| Follicular fluid GDF-9 (pg/mL) | 2218.97 ± 889.98 | 1472.15 ± 542.97 | 0.0161 * | 1869.36 ± 809.85 | 1575.20 ± 669.51 | 0.2448 |
| Serum HA (ng/mL) | 212.82 ± 102.33 | 145.43 ± 82.39 | 0.0825 ° | 157.81 ± 100.55 | 165.63 ± 89.28 | 0.8199 |
| Follicular fluid HA (ng/mL) | 494.00 ± 291.53 | 518.37 ± 231.81 | 0.7963 | 558.39 ± 313.20 | 492.53 ± 212.82 | 0.4809 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.84 ± 7.22 | 26.22 ± 6.89 | 0.9006 | 25.39 ± 7.55 | 26.51 ± 6.63 | 0.6998 |
| Maternal age (years) | 31.42 ± 3.96 | 33.41 ± 3.50 | 0.1461 | 31.21 ± 4.56 | 33.67 ± 2.94 | 0.0839 ° |
| Cumulative FSH dose (IU) | 2188.33 ± 1356.26 | 2254.55 ± 665.24 | 0.8743 | 2045.36 ± 955.50 | 2333.59 ± 877.66 | 0.3557 |
| Mature (MII) oocytes (n) | 6.67 ± 5.03 | 3.89 ± 3.24 | 0.0988 ° | 5.23 ± 5.15 | 4.48 ± 3.41 | 0.6396 |
| Mid-stimulation estradiol (E2, pg/mL) | 2366.33 ± 1738.68 | 1209.52 ± 1401.79 | 0.0563 ° | 2082.43 ± 2386.83 | 1271.04 ± 866.07 | 0.2377 |
| Variable | OR | 95% CI (Low) | 95% CI (High) | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept (constant) | 0.27 | 0.10 | 0.72 | 0.009 * |
| Relative ZP thinning (Δrel, z-standardized) | 5.94 | 2.23 | 15.81 | <0.001 * |
| FF GDF-9 (z-standardized) | 4.33 | 1.46 | 12.82 | 0.008 * |
| FF Syn4 (z-standardized) | 0.75 | 0.30 | 1.88 | 0.53 |
| FF HA (z-standardized) | 1.15 | 0.57 | 2.31 | 0.70 |
| Variable | PC1 Contribution (%) | PC2 Contribution (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Relative ZP thinning (Δrel) | 30.8 | 1.5 |
| ZP thinning slope | 29.3 | 1.8 |
| Maternal age (years) | 11.0 | 1.9 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.3 | 41.5 |
| Cumulative FSH dose (IU) | 19.0 | 8.5 |
| FF GDF-9 (pg/mL) | 8.4 | 2.8 |
| FF Syn4 (ng/mL) | <0.001 | 41.6 |
| FF HA (ng/mL) | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Term | EDF | Ref.df | F-Value | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| s(PC1) | 2.917 | 3.647 | 20.656 | <0.001 * |
| s(PC2) | 1.000 | 1.000 | 4.037 | 0.0575 ° |
| Predictor | R2 (Marginal) | p (Permutation) |
|---|---|---|
| Global model fit (pseudo-R2) | 0.308 | 0.022 * |
| Maternal age (years) | 0.075 | 0.073 ° |
| BMI (kg/m2) | <0.001 | 0.999 |
| Cumulative FSH dose (IU) | 0.213 | 0.003 * |
| FF GDF-9 (pg/mL) | 0.090 | 0.036 * |
| FF HA (ng/mL) | 0.018 | 0.420 |
| FF Syn4 (ng/mL) | 0.012 | 0.499 |
| Variable | OR | 95% CI (Low) | 95% CI (High) | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept (constant) | 0.59 | 0.17 | 2.07 | 0.410 |
| Relative ZP thinning (Δrel, z-standardized) | 3.65 | 1.39 | 9.62 | 0.009 * |
| FF GDF-9 (z-standardized) | 0.90 | 0.40 | 2.03 | 0.801 |
| FF Syn4 (z-standardized) | 0.92 | 0.40 | 2.12 | 0.852 |
| FF HA (z-standardized) | 1.51 | 0.62 | 3.68 | 0.365 |
| Assisted hatching (yes vs. no) | 0.92 | 0.17 | 5.16 | 0.928 |
| Predictor | p (Permutation) |
|---|---|
| Global model (adjusted R2 = 0.28) | 0.005 * |
| Maternal age (years) | 0.045 * |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.937 |
| Mid-stimulation estradiol (E2, pg/mL) | 0.164 |
| Cumulative FSH dose (IU) | 0.004 * |
| Stimulation protocol (group) | 0.709 |
| Mature (MII) oocytes (n) | 0.955 |
| FF GDF-9 (pg/mL) | 0.087 ° |
| FF HA (ng/mL) | 0.259 |
| FF Syn4 (ng/mL) | 0.970 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Mauchart, P.; Gödöny, K.; Jakabfi-Csepregi, R.; Várnagy, Á.; Sulyok, E.; Bódis, J. Zona Pellucida Dynamics Integrate Biochemical and Clinical Indicators of Embryo Competence. J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15, 2038. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15052038
Mauchart P, Gödöny K, Jakabfi-Csepregi R, Várnagy Á, Sulyok E, Bódis J. Zona Pellucida Dynamics Integrate Biochemical and Clinical Indicators of Embryo Competence. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2026; 15(5):2038. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15052038
Chicago/Turabian StyleMauchart, Péter, Krisztina Gödöny, Rita Jakabfi-Csepregi, Ákos Várnagy, Endre Sulyok, and József Bódis. 2026. "Zona Pellucida Dynamics Integrate Biochemical and Clinical Indicators of Embryo Competence" Journal of Clinical Medicine 15, no. 5: 2038. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15052038
APA StyleMauchart, P., Gödöny, K., Jakabfi-Csepregi, R., Várnagy, Á., Sulyok, E., & Bódis, J. (2026). Zona Pellucida Dynamics Integrate Biochemical and Clinical Indicators of Embryo Competence. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 15(5), 2038. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15052038
