Effect of Combined Cataract and Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgeries on Glaucoma-Specific Quality of Life
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Methods
2.1. Study Population
2.2. Assessment of Glaucoma-Specific QoL
2.3. Collection of Covariables
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Baseline Characteristics
3.2. Post-Surgery Clinical Outcomes
3.3. Post-Surgery GlauCAT Outcomes
3.4. Contribution of Clinical Parameters to Significant Changes in Post-PHACO-MIGS Changes in GlauCATTM Scores
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Tham, Y.C.; Li, X.; Wong, T.Y.; Quigley, H.A.; Aung, T.; Cheng, C.Y. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2014, 121, 2081–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fenwick, E.K.; Man, R.E.; Aung, T.; Ramulu, P.; Lamoureux, E.L. Beyond intraocular pressure: Optimizing patient-reported outcomes in glaucoma. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2020, 76, 100801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abe, R.Y.; Diniz-Filho, A.; Costa, V.P.; Gracitelli, C.P.; Baig, S.; Medeiros, F.A. The Impact of Location of Progressive Visual Field Loss on Longitudinal Changes in Quality of Life of Patients with Glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2016, 123, 552–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ekici, F.; Loh, R.; Waisbourd, M.; Sun, Y.; Martinez, P.; Nayak, N.; Wizov, S.S.; Hegarty, S.; Hark, L.A.; Spaeth, G.L. Relationships Between Measures of the Ability to Perform Vision-Related Activities, Vision-Related Quality of Life, and Clinical Findings in Patients With Glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015, 133, 1377–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Latif, K.; Nishida, T.; Moghimi, S.; Weinreb, R.N. Quality of life in glaucoma. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2023, 261, 3023–3030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lusthaus, J.; Goldberg, I. Current management of glaucoma. Med. J. Aust. 2019, 210, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sihota, R.; Angmo, D.; Ramaswamy, D.; Dada, T. Simplifying "target" intraocular pressure for different stages of primary open-angle glaucoma and primary angle-closure glaucoma. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2018, 66, 495–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inoue, K. Managing adverse effects of glaucoma medications. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014, 8, 903–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osterberg, L.; Blaschke, T. Adherence to medication. N. Engl J. Med. 2005, 353, 487–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manasses, D.T.; Au, L. The New Era of Glaucoma Micro-stent Surgery. Ophthalmol. Ther. 2016, 5, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balas, M.; Mathew, D.J. Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: A Review of the Literature. Vision (Basel) 2023, 7, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agrawal, P.; Bradshaw, S.E. Systematic Literature Review of Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Micro-Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS) in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. Ophthalmol. Ther. 2018, 7, 49–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samuelson, T.W.; Sarkisian, S.R., Jr.; Lubeck, D.M.; Stiles, M.C.; Duh, Y.-J.; Romo, E.A.; Giamporcaro, J.E.; Hornbeak, D.M.; Katz, L.J.; Bartlett, W.; et al. Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Pivotal Trial of an Ab Interno Implanted Trabecular Micro-Bypass in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Cataract: Two-Year Results. Ophthalmology 2019, 126, 811–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, I.I.K.; De Francesco, T.; Rhee, D.; McCabe, C.; Flowers, B.; Gazzard, G.; Samuelson, T.W.; Singh, K.; HORIZON Investigators. Long-term Outcomes from the HORIZON Randomized Trial for a Schlemm’s Canal Microstent in Combination Cataract and Glaucoma Surgery. Ophthalmology 2022, 129, 742–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samuelson, T.W.; Singh, I.P.; Williamson, B.K.; Falvey, H.; Lee, W.C.; Odom, D.; McSorley, D.; Katz, L.J. Quality of Life in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Cataract: An Analysis of VFQ-25 and OSDI From the iStent inject® Pivotal Trial. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2021, 229, 220–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Man, R.E.K.; Fenwick, E.K.; Khadka, J.; Wu, Z.; Skalicky, S.; Pesudovs, K.; Lamoureux, E.L. Psychometric Evaluation of Glaucoma Quality of Life Item Banks (GlauCAT) and Initial Assessment Using Computerized Adaptive Testing. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 2022, 11, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gershon, R.C. Computer adaptive testing. J. Appl. Meas. 2005, 6, 109–127. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Weinreb, R.N.; Ramulu, P.; Topouzis, F.; Park, K.; Mansouri, K.; Lerner, S. Glaucoma Surgery; Kugler Publications: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; Volume 11. [Google Scholar]
- Jones, L.; Maes, N.; Qidwai, U.; Ratnarajan, G. Impact of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery on the ocular surface and quality of life in patients with glaucoma. Ther. Adv. Ophthalmol. 2023, 15, 25158414231152765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuasa, Y.; Hirooka, K.; Okada, N.; Onoe, H.; Murakami, Y.; Okumichi, H.; Kiuchi, Y. Vision-Related Quality of Life following Combined Cataract and Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery or Cataract Surgery Alone in Glaucoma Patients. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 3279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Al Habash, A.; Nagshbandi, A.A. Quality of Life After Combined Cataract and Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery in Glaucoma Patients. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2020, 14, 3049–3056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turalba, A.; Payal, A.R.; Gonzalez-Gonzalez, L.A.; Cakiner-Egilmez, T.; Chomsky, A.S.; Vollman, D.E.; Baze, E.F.; Lawrence, M.; Daly, M.K. Cataract Surgery Outcomes in Glaucomatous Eyes: Results From the Veterans Affairs Ophthalmic Surgery Outcomes Data Project. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2015, 160, 693–701.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, X.; Sun, Q.; Ma, Y.Y.; Zou, H.D. Vision-related Quality of Life Outcomes of Cataract Surgery in Advanced Glaucoma Patients. J. Glaucoma 2016, 25, e5–e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pahlitzsch, M.; Klamann, M.K.; Pahlitzsch, M.L.; Gonnermann, J.; Torun, N.; Bertelmann, E. Is there a change in the quality of life comparing the micro-invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) and the filtration technique trabeculectomy in glaucoma patients? Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2017, 255, 351–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saxena, R.; Singh, D.; Vashist, P. Glaucoma: An emerging peril. Indian J. Community Med. 2013, 38, 135–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shindler, K.S.; Sankar, P.S.; Volpe, N.J.; Piltz-Seymour, J.R. Intermittent headaches as the presenting sign of subacute angle-closure glaucoma. Neurology 2005, 65, 757–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, N.; Summers, S.; Alryalat, S.A.; Patnaik, J.; Lazcano-Gomez, G.; Seibold, L.; Kahook, M. A Systematic Review of the PAUL Glaucoma Implant. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2025, 19, 3255–3271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, D.; Shah, P.; Zhang, C.; Ho, B.; AbouKasm, G.; Musheyev, B.; Goldburg, S.; Zhu, E.; Wong, A.; Bitrian, E.; et al. Standalone Canaloplasty and Trabeculotomy Using the OMNI Surgical System in Patients With Open Angle Glaucoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J. Glaucoma 2025, 34, 949–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, J. A power primer. Psychol. Bull. 1992, 112, 155–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fenwick, E.K.; Man, R.E.K.; Lim, B.; Baskaran, M.; Nongpiur, M.; Sng, C.C.A.; Iyer, J.V.; Husain, R.; Perera, S.; Wong, T.; et al. Efficiency, Precision, Validity, and Reliability of GlauCAT-Asian Computerized Adaptive Tests in Measuring Glaucoma-Related Quality of Life. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 2024, 13, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fenwick, E.K.; Ozdemir, S.; Man, R.E.K.; Baid, D.; Htoon, H.M.; Gan, A.T.L.; Tey, M.L.; Aw, A.T.; Baskaran, M.; Nongpiur, M.E.; et al. Development and Validation of a Preference-Based Glaucoma Utility Instrument Using Discrete Choice Experiment. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021, 139, 866–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| Characteristics | N (%) or Mean ± SD | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 70.84 ± 6.70 | |
| Race | Chinese | 75 (90.4) |
| Malay | 4 (4.8) | |
| Indian | 4 (4.8) | |
| Gender | Male | 54 (65.1) |
| Female | 29 (34.9) | |
| Baseline IOP (mmHg) | 15.29 ± 4.13 | |
| Number of glaucoma medications prescribed pre-surgery | 1.66 (0.75)/range 1–4 | |
| Visual field deficit (dB) | −8.52 ± 5.52 | |
| Presenting VA of the better-seeing eye (LogMAR) | 0.23 ± 0.14 | |
| Surgical Outcomes Post-Surgery | ||||||
| Outcome Measure | Mean Difference (SD) | p-Value | ||||
| IOP (mmHg) | 1.35 (4.20) | 0.005 | ||||
| Visual field deficit (dB) | −0.90 (2.97) | 0.010 | ||||
| Presenting visual acuity in better-seeing eye (LogMAR) | 0.11 (0.15) | <0.001 | ||||
| Number of anti-glaucoma medications prescribed | −1.30 (0.11) | <0.001 | ||||
| GlauCATTM quality-of-life domains | ||||||
| Domains | Pre-surgery (mean [SD]) | Post-surgery (mean [SD]) | Difference | p-value | Effect size * | Statistical power (%) |
| Visual Symptoms | 72.76 (16.59) | 85.81 (14.33) | 13.04 | <0.001 | 0.842 | |
| Ocular Comfort Symptoms | 79.84 (13.05) | 86.26 (11.64) | 6.42 | 0.001 | 0.519 | |
| Emotional | 90.98 (14.47) | 94.07 (13.40) | 3.09 | 0.155 | 48.6 | |
| Activity Limitation | 91.21 (12.99) | 94.24 (13.13) | 3.03 | 0.139 | 54.7 | |
| Driving | 60.39 (19.64) | 61.85 (20.74) | 1.46 | 0.641 | 9.7 | |
| Lighting | 91.01 (13.74) | 92.24 (16.41) | 1.26 | 0.406 | 10.6 | |
| Mobility | 97.32 (7.58) | 97.74 (7.31) | 0.28 | 0.811 | 6.3 | |
| Treatment Convenience | 89.79 (16.29) | 88.78 (15.11) | −1.02 | 0.677 | 8.7 | |
| Concerns | 77.88 (15.72) | 85.52 (14.49) | 7.53 | 0.002 | 0.505 | |
| Social | 96.17 (9.61) | 97.09 (8.90) | 0.72 | 0.619 | 10.4 | |
| General Convenience | 85.64 (15.34) | 91.98 (12.52) | 6.34 | 0.004 | 0.453 | |
| Economic | 84.32 (22.82) | 83.06 (26.27) | −1.26 | 0.741 | 7.2 | |
| % Contribution | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical Parameters | Visual Symptoms | Ocular Comfort Symptoms | Concerns | Convenience-General |
| Intraocular pressure | 30.74% | 74.95% | 51.20% | 55.81% |
| Visual field deficit | 21.21% | 1.95% | 1.71% | 15.96% |
| Better eye presenting VA | 38.31% | 1.11% | 42.25% | 26.36% |
| No. of topical drops | 9.74% | 21.99% | 4.84% | 1.87% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Au Eong, J.T.W.; Low, J.R.; Fenwick, E.K.; Htoon, H.M.; Perera, S.A.; Wong, T.T.; Lamoureux, E.L.; Man, R.E.K. Effect of Combined Cataract and Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgeries on Glaucoma-Specific Quality of Life. J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15, 1215. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15031215
Au Eong JTW, Low JR, Fenwick EK, Htoon HM, Perera SA, Wong TT, Lamoureux EL, Man REK. Effect of Combined Cataract and Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgeries on Glaucoma-Specific Quality of Life. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2026; 15(3):1215. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15031215
Chicago/Turabian StyleAu Eong, Jonathan T. W., Jin Rong Low, Eva K. Fenwick, Hla M. Htoon, Shamira A. Perera, Tina T. Wong, Ecosse L. Lamoureux, and Ryan E. K. Man. 2026. "Effect of Combined Cataract and Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgeries on Glaucoma-Specific Quality of Life" Journal of Clinical Medicine 15, no. 3: 1215. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15031215
APA StyleAu Eong, J. T. W., Low, J. R., Fenwick, E. K., Htoon, H. M., Perera, S. A., Wong, T. T., Lamoureux, E. L., & Man, R. E. K. (2026). Effect of Combined Cataract and Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgeries on Glaucoma-Specific Quality of Life. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 15(3), 1215. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15031215

