This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessReview
Shear Wave Elastography in Musculoskeletal Imaging: A Narrative Review
by
Enes Gurun
Enes Gurun 1,*
,
Mesut Ozturk
Mesut Ozturk 1
,
Mustafa Basaran
Mustafa Basaran 1 and
Ahmet Emin Okutan
Ahmet Emin Okutan 2
1
Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Samsun University, 55080 Samsun, Türkiye
2
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Samsun University, 55080 Samsun, Türkiye
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(12), 4843; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15124843 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 14 May 2026
/
Revised: 14 June 2026
/
Accepted: 18 June 2026
/
Published: 22 June 2026
Abstract
Shear wave elastography (SWE) is an increasingly investigated ultrasound-based technique in musculoskeletal imaging that provides quantitative information on tissue stiffness and biomechanical properties. This narrative review aims to summarize the basic principles, technical considerations, current clinical applications, limitations, and future perspectives of SWE in musculoskeletal imaging. Unlike conventional grayscale and Doppler ultrasonography, which mainly assess morphology and vascularity, SWE may provide additional functional information in major musculoskeletal tissues, including tendons and ligaments, skeletal muscles, peripheral nerves, fibrocartilaginous structures, plantar fascia, and selected soft tissue lesions. Current evidence suggests potential roles for SWE in detecting early biomechanical alterations, assessing disease severity, differentiating symptomatic from asymptomatic tissues, and monitoring response to treatment or rehabilitation. However, musculoskeletal tissues are anisotropic, viscoelastic, and position-dependent; as a result, SWE measurements are influenced by acquisition-related factors, tissue biomechanics, positioning and loading conditions, region of interest (ROI) placement, tissue depth, and device-related variability. For this reason, SWE findings should not be interpreted as standalone diagnostic criteria but should be considered together with clinical findings, conventional ultrasonography, MRI, electrophysiology, histopathology, and patient-centered outcomes when appropriate. This review highlights the need for tissue-specific measurement protocols, standardized reporting, normative reference data, inter-vendor harmonization, and longitudinal validation against clinically meaningful outcomes before SWE can be more reliably integrated into routine musculoskeletal imaging and rehabilitation practice.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Gurun, E.; Ozturk, M.; Basaran, M.; Okutan, A.E.
Shear Wave Elastography in Musculoskeletal Imaging: A Narrative Review. J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15, 4843.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15124843
AMA Style
Gurun E, Ozturk M, Basaran M, Okutan AE.
Shear Wave Elastography in Musculoskeletal Imaging: A Narrative Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2026; 15(12):4843.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15124843
Chicago/Turabian Style
Gurun, Enes, Mesut Ozturk, Mustafa Basaran, and Ahmet Emin Okutan.
2026. "Shear Wave Elastography in Musculoskeletal Imaging: A Narrative Review" Journal of Clinical Medicine 15, no. 12: 4843.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15124843
APA Style
Gurun, E., Ozturk, M., Basaran, M., & Okutan, A. E.
(2026). Shear Wave Elastography in Musculoskeletal Imaging: A Narrative Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 15(12), 4843.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15124843
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.