Next Article in Journal
Longitudinal Changes in Body Composition and Fluid Distribution During Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients: A Prospective Single-Center Longitudinal Observational Study Using Bioimpedance Spectroscopy
Previous Article in Journal
Concordance Between Anthropometric Formula Predictions and Chest Radiograph-Confirmed Endotracheal Tube Depth in Young Infants: A Retrospective Cohort Study from Saudi Arabia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

KL-6 as a Biomarker for Adult Patients with Cystic Fibrosis and the Impact of MUC1 Genotype

by
Sarah Ricken
1,2,†,
Sarah Dietz-Terjung
1,3,4,
Gerhard Weinreich
4,
Jose Ortiz
3,
Michaela Schedel
1,2,
Svenja Straßburg
4,
Christian Taube
4,5,
Matthias Welsner
4,
Francesco Bonella
4,6 and
Sivagurunathan Sutharsan
4,*
1
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, University Medical Center Essen-Ruhrlandklinik, 45239 Essen, Germany
2
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, University Medical Center Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45141 Essen, Germany
3
Department of Sleep and Telemedicine, University Medical Center Essen-Ruhrlandklinik, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45239 Essen, Germany
4
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, University Medical Center Essen-Ruhrlandklinik, Adult Cystic Fibrosis Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45239 Essen, Germany
5
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Ruhrlandklinik, University Medicine Essen, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), University of Duisburg-Essen, 45239 Essen, Germany
6
Center for Interstitial and Rare Lung Diseases, Pneumology Department, University Medical Center Essen-Ruhrlandklinik, 45239 Essen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Current address: Department of Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Lung Center Stuttgart—Schillerhöhe Lung Clinic, Robert Bosch Krankenhaus GmbH, 70376 Stuttgart, Germany.
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(12), 4555; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15124555
Submission received: 6 May 2026 / Revised: 26 May 2026 / Accepted: 27 May 2026 / Published: 12 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Respiratory Medicine)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) is a mucin-like glycoprotein that is elevated in a variety of lung diseases and used as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF). Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in mucin-1 (MUC1) influence KL-6 serum concentration. This study investigated the relationship between serum KL-6 concentrations in pwCF and a MUC1 SNP and its longitudinal dynamics. Methods: The study included pwCF (n = 174) and healthy controls (n = 30). In pwCF, 365 samples were collected for longitudinal analyses; KL-6 levels were measured and the MUC1 SNP rs4072037 was genotyped in pwCF and controls. Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between KL-6, genotype, and clinical parameters, such as infectious exacerbation, body mass index, inflammatory values and lung function, were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. Results: Serum KL-6 was significantly elevated in pwCF compared with controls (458 ± 357 vs. 283 ± 103 U/mL; p < 0.001). Homozygous G/G carriers exhibited higher baseline KL-6 than A/A carriers (627 ± 673 vs. 397 ± 148 U/mL; p < 0.001), while heterozygous individuals showed intermediate levels. Longitudinally, the MUC1 SNP and interindividual differences in vital capacity (ppFVC) primarily determined baseline KL-6 levels, explaining 52.5% of variance. Short-term intraindividual fluctuations were largely driven by infectious exacerbations independent of genotype, accounting for ~10% of within-subject variance. Conclusions: PwCF generally showed elevated serum KL-6 levels and reflected both stable interindividual differences, mainly driven by the MUC1 SNP and ppFVC. Dynamic intraindividualchanges were associated with infectious exacerbations. Given the influence of MUC1 polymorphisms (e.g., rs4072037) on KL-6 concentration, personalized interpretation based on the genotype status may be informative in pwCF.

1. Introduction

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an autosomal recessive genetic disorder caused by mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductor regulator (CFTR) gene, affecting over 100,000 individuals worldwide and leading to a multisystem disease with significant pulmonary involvement [1,2,3]. These mutations result in decreased quantity and/or function of the CFTR protein, an anion channel expressed on epithelial cells in multiple organs [1,3,4]. The disease manifests with symptoms such as chronic cough, obstructive bronchitis, recurrent pneumonia, and eventually respiratory insufficiency due to progressive lung destruction [5]. Comorbidities frequently include chronic sinusitis, pancreatic insufficiency, liver disease, osteoporosis, and gastrointestinal complications. Psychological challenges such as anxiety and depression are also common [6].
Therapeutic strategies include inhaled mucolytics, antibiotics, and physiotherapy. CFTR modulators such as ivacaftor (a potentiator) and correctors like lumacaftor, tezacaftor, vanzacaftor and elexacaftor aim to restore CFTR protein function, particularly in individuals carrying the most common F508del mutation [7,8,9,10]. In advanced stages of disease, lung transplantation may be required, while palliative care, including non-invasive ventilation, remains an option when transplantation is not feasible [1].
KL-6, encoded by the mucin-1 (MUC1) gene, is expressed on type II alveolar epithelial cells and is elevated in a range of pulmonary diseases, including interstitial lung diseases [11,12], non-small cell lung cancer [13], and CF [14]. KL-6 can be detected in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and has gained attention as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in conditions such as pleural mesothelioma [15], diffuse alveolar hemorrhage [16], and SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia [17]. It has also been shown to predict acute exacerbations in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [18], chronic lung allograft dysfunction in lung transplant recipients [19], and disease severity and clinical outcomes alveolar proteinosis [13].
As a predictive biomarker, elevated KL-6 levels are associated with pulmonary disease progression and an increased risk of exacerbations [12,18]. In patients with CF (pwCF), we previously demonstrated that serum KL-6 levels were significantly elevated compared with age- and sex-matched healthy controls and correlated inversely with lung function parameters, including percent predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (ppFEV1) and percent predicted forced vital capacity (ppFVC) [14]. KL-6 showed superior diagnostic performance compared with conventional inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), while KL-6 concentrations were independent of pancreatic insufficiency, chronic infection status, hospitalization frequency, sex, age, and inhaled or oral therapies [14].
As a preventive measure, routine KL-6 monitoring may allow for early detection of epithelial injury or subclinical exacerbation, enabling proactive interventions and reducing long-term lung damage [17,18]. For different diseases including pulmonary alveolar proteinosis [13], interstitial lung diseases [20,21,22,23], and antisynthetase syndrome-associated interstitial lung disease [24], the KL-6 serum concentration is influenced by genetic variants in the MUC1 gene, particularly by the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs4072037, located in an exonic region leading to an amino acid change; individuals homozygous for the polymorphic allele (G/G) have been reported to show higher KL-6 levels than those with A/G or A/A genotypes, suggesting allele-specific reference values [13,25].
Our study aims to assess KL-6 levels in relation to the genotype status of rs4072037 in pwCF compared with healthy controls and to evaluate its potential as a biomarker for monitoring disease severity, predicting outcomes, enabling personalized care, and supporting participatory medicine in CF.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patient Population, Clinical Data, and Clinical Definitions

PwCF, who received treatment at the Ruhrlandklinik Essen, Germany, between 12 March 2015 and 12 January 2018, were eligible for inclusion in the study. CF diagnosis was confirmed by evidence of CFTR dysfunction, either through pathological chloride sweat test results in at least two independent measurements or by the presence of two CF-causing CFTR mutations. The control group consisted of healthy, non-smoking individuals without any known pulmonary disease. Control samples were provided by Bonella et al. and originated from a previously conducted, ethically approved study [13]. All participants provided informed consent for the use of blood and serum as well as associated clinical data. The West German Biobank Essen (WBE) approved the protocol, including permission for genomic analyses, under the approval of the local ethics committee (ethics approval no. 17-7667-BO). The study protocol approved by the local ethics committee (approval no. 17-7667-BO) explicitly included the analysis of biobanked samples as well as the prospective collection of additional samples and clinical follow-up data.
Accordingly, the present investigation comprised a retrospective analysis of previously stored biobank samples and associated clinical data together with prospectively collected samples obtained after ethics approval within the same approved observational protocol. No study-specific visits, blood sampling procedures, or additional patient appointments were performed for the purpose of this study. All biological samples and clinical data were obtained during routine outpatient follow-up visits or hospitalizations as part of standard clinical care and were analyzed retrospectively.
The data included demographic parameters (age, sex, body mass index (BMI)), CFTR genotype, sweat chloride concentration, lung function, pancreatic function, inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein (CRP), blood leukocytes, serum IgG (IgG)), CF-related diabetes, infectious exacerbations, and microbial colonization of sputum. For longitudinal analyses, all available serum samples from 174 pwCF were included, resulting in 365 samples in total (1–5 samples per patient, mean interval 5.68 months). Patients were categorized based on their CFTR mutation and chronic pathogen colonization. Pancreatic insufficiency was defined by the need for enzyme substitution, and diabetes mellitus was defined according to specific guidelines [26].
An infectious exacerbation was defined by the presence of at least one of the following criteria: (i) an increase in CRP levels of >2 mg/dL compared with the patient’s previous value, (ii) initiation of antibiotic therapy or modification of an ongoing antibiotic regimen, or (iii) clinical deterioration characterized by a combination of changes in sputum color, increased sputum production, enhanced expectoration, and/or fever.

2.2. KL-6 Quantification

KL-6 concentration was measured in serum samples from 174 pwCF, from whom a total of 365 serum samples were collected longitudinally, and 30 healthy controls using the Nanopia® KL-6 Reagent (Sekisui Medical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), as previously described [13]. The first blood sample obtained from each individual was defined as the baseline KL-6 level. Briefly, 150 µL of buffer solution (Reagent 1) was added to 2.5 µL of serum. After a 5 min incubation, Reagent 2 containing the monoclonal KL-6 antibody was added. Changes in absorption at 570/800 nm after 5 min were measured using the ADVIA® 1800 Clinical Chemistry System (Siemens Healthineers AG, Erlangen, Germany), calibrated with the Nanopia® KL-6 Calibrator (Sekisui Medical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).

2.3. Genotyping

DNA was isolated from serum samples stored in the WBE by the WBE using standard procedures for serum DNA extraction. The SNP rs4072037 was genotyped in 174 pwCF and 30 healthy controls using the TaqMan® SNP Genotyping Assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific (Applied Biosystems), Waltham, MA, USA), based on real-time polymerase chain reaction with fluorescence measurements. The assay included primers and TaqMan® MGB probes to detect different alleles. The probes contained a reporter dye (VIC® or FAM™) at the 5′ end and a quencher dye at the 3′ end. Each sample was measured in duplicate as a technical replicate, and samples yielding an undetermined result in either replicate were excluded, resulting in a final genotyped cohort of 158 pwCF.

2.4. Statistical Analyses

For descriptive analyses, both absolute numbers and percentages were used for categorical data, as well as mean and standard deviation for continuous data. Patients were categorized into subgroups based on their MUC1 SNP (homozygous for the wildtype allele: A/A, heterozygous A/G, or homozygous for the polymorphic allele: G/G). The analysis initially used one measurement per participant to ensure sample independence. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to test normality of distribution. Between-group comparisons of non-normally distributed variables were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test or Kruskal–Wallis test, with post hoc Dunn–Bonferroni tests. Associations between KL-6 concentration and continuous variables were assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation. Effect sizes were calculated according to Cohen’s formula. Results with a p-value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Longitudinal analyses were conducted using linear mixed-effects models (LMMs) to account for repeated measurements within individuals and to model both intra- and interindividual variability. KL-6 concentrations were log-transformed to meet model assumptions. Fixed effects included MUC1 genotype, lung function (FEV1, VC), inflammatory markers [CRP, leukocytes, immunoglobulin G (IgG)], BMI, and pulmonary exacerbations. Continuous covariates were decomposed into between-person (interindividual) and within-person (intraindividual) components by centering around the individual mean, allowing separate estimation of associations driven by differences between patients versus temporal changes within patients. Random effects at the patient level were initially included but removed when found redundant. The significance of fixed effects was evaluated using F-statistics derived from the LMMs, with degrees of freedom estimated according to the Satterthwaite approximation. Estimated marginal means (EMMs) were calculated and back-transformed to the original scale (U/mL) for interpretation. p-values were derived from model-based fixed-effect estimates, and no correction for multiple testing was applied. Due to the small number of heterozygous carriers, analyses in this subgroup were considered exploratory.
Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 29.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Patient Demographics

A total of 174 pwCF were included (58.6% male; mean age at sample collection: 33 ± 12.0 years; range: 16–71 years) (Table 1), along with 30 healthy control subjects (63.3% male; mean age: 41 ± 10.8 years; range: 20–64 years). Age did not significantly differ between pwCF and healthy controls (41.4 ± 10.8 vs. 32.3 ± 11.6 years; p > 0.05), and no significant difference in sex distribution and any other clinical parameter was observed between the groups (p > 0.05). On average, 1.7 measurements were collected per patient (range: 1–5), with a mean interval of 5.7 months between the first and subsequent samples (range: 0–24 months). KL-6 values were missing for seven of the 365 samples (1.9%).

3.2. MUC1 Polymorphism rs4072037

Genotyping of rs4072037 was successful in 158 pwCF and 30 healthy controls. Minor allele frequencies (MAFs) were calculated for each cohort independently. Comparable to the expected MAF of a cohort of European decent (allele frequency aggregator, MAF = 0.47) [8], a MAF of 0.50 was observed in the healthy control group and genotypes were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) (χ2 = 1.2, p = 0.27). In contrast, the MAF was 0.26 in pwCF deviating from HWE as expected due to disease selection (Table 2).
In the control group, the distribution of the MUC1 polymorphism rs4072037 was that nine were homozygous carriers of the A/A genotype (30.0%), 12 individuals (40%) were heterozygous (A/G) and nine were homozygous for G/G (30.0%) (Table 2). In 158 pwCF, 66.1% were homozygous for the wildtype allele (A/A)), five (2.9%) pwCF were heterozygous and 21.8% were homozygous for the polymorphic allele G/G). Genotyping was unsuccessful in 16 patients (9.2%) due to insufficient DNA quality or concentration.
No genotype-dependent differences were observed in any clinical parameter analyzed in pwCF.

3.3. KL-6 Concentrations in pwCF and Association with the MUC1 Genotype of rs4072037

The mean ± SD KL-6 concentration was significantly higher in pwCF at baseline compared with the control group (458.08 ± 356.97 U/mL vs. 282.93 ± 103.10; p < 0.001; effect size 0.33) (Figure 1).
In pwCF, a statistically significant difference in KL-6 concentrations at baseline depending on the MUC1 genotype of rs4072037 (p < 0.05) was observed. Subsequent pairwise comparisons showed no statistically significant difference in KL-6 concentration between homozygous carriers of the A allele and heterozygous pwCF (p = 0.302). Similar effects were observed in heterozygous individuals compared with homozygous pwCF of the polymorphic allele (p = 1.000). Significantly higher KL-6 levels were associated in pwCF with the homozygous G versus A genotype (p = 0.000015) (Table 3).
Additional analyses using dominant and recessive models in pwCF confirmed these findings as KL-6 concentrations were significantly higher in patients carrying at least one G allele, supporting a genotype-dependent effect of the MUC1 rs4072037 variant on KL-6 levels in pwCF (Table 3).
Although KL-6 levels within the control group were numerically higher in homozygous carriers of the polymorphic allele than in homozygous carriers of the wildtype allele or heterozygous individuals, these differences for the MUC1 SNP rs4072037 were not statistically significant. Similarly, the dominant or recessive model did not reveal a genotype-dependent effect on KL-6 levels in controls (Table 3).
However, KL-6 levels were significantly higher in pwCF compared with controls across all genotype groups: A/A (median 397 vs. 251 U/mL, Mann–Whitney U = 817, p = 0.002), A/G (median 523 vs. 267 U/mL, Mann–Whitney U = 57, p = 0.004), and G/G (median 672 vs. 337 U/mL, Mann–Whitney U = 268, p = 0.004, exact test).

3.4. Baseline Associations Between KL-6 Concentrations and Clinical Characteristics

KL-6 concentrations were significantly associated with several clinical and inflammatory parameters at baseline (Table 4):
A negative correlation was observed between KL-6 concentrations and BMI (Spearman’s ρ = −0.304, p < 0.001). In addition, KL-6 levels were significantly higher in pwCF presenting with an infectious exacerbation at baseline compared with those without exacerbation (p < 0.001).
Regarding inflammatory markers, KL-6 concentrations showed moderate positive correlations with CRP (Spearman’s ρ = 0.429, p < 0.001) and leukocyte counts (Spearman’s ρ = 0.328, p < 0.001), as well as a weak but statistically significant positive correlation with IgG levels (Spearman’s ρ = 0.263, p = 0.005).
Furthermore, KL-6 concentrations were strongly negatively correlated with lung function parameters, including ppFVC (Spearman’s ρ = −0.610, p < 0.001) and ppFEV1 (Spearman’s ρ = −0.608, p < 0.001).
In contrast, no significant associations were observed between KL-6, age, sex, CFTR mutation class, pancreatic insufficiency, or the presence of CF-related diabetes mellitus (CFRD). Likewise, correlations between KL-6 and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), calprotectin, and sweat chloride concentration were weak and not statistically significant.
KL-6 concentrations tended to be higher in participants colonized with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (582.8 ± 694.5 U/mL, n = 34) or multiple pathogens (467.6 ± 183.2 U/mL, n = 81) compared with those without colonization (356.3 ± 141.0 U/mL, n = 24) or single non-Pseudomonas organisms, although pairwise post hoc comparisons were not significant after Bonferroni correction.
Stratified analyses by the MUC1 genotype of rs4072037 were performed to assess whether the genotype modified the associations between KL-6 concentrations and BMI, infectious exacerbations, inflammatory markers (CRP, leukocytes, IgG), and lung function. Across genotypes, negative correlations were observed between KL-6 and BMI, as well as KL-6 and lung function (ppFVC and ppFEV1), with statistical significance in homozygous carriers of the A and the G allele (Spearman’s ρ ranging from −0.313 to −0.750, all p < 0.01, Table 5). Positive correlations between KL-6 and CRP, leukocyte counts, and IgG were also significant for pwCF homozygous for the wildtype and the polymorphic allele (Spearman’s ρ 0.270–0.523, all p ≤ 0.01).
The presence of infectious exacerbation was associated with higher KL-6 levels in G/G carriers (p = 0.009) but not in patients with at least one A allele. Fisher Z comparisons of correlation coefficients revealed no significant differences between genotypes for any parameter, suggesting that the MUC1 genotype did not significantly modify these associations (Table 5).

3.5. KL-6 Concentrations over Time

Given the significant associations of KL-6 with markers of inflammation, lung function, and nutritional status at baseline, the distribution of these clinical parameters was subsequently examined across all longitudinal samples and stratified by the MUC1 genotype of rs4072037. Clinical parameters were recorded at the time of each sample collection. Overall, the longitudinal distributions were comparable to baseline characteristics (Table 4). Considering the unequal genotype group sizes and the presence of repeated measurements per individual, no formal between-group statistical comparisons were conducted.
In longitudinal mixed-effects models (LMMs), interindividual effects reflect differences in KL-6 levels between subjects, whereas intraindividual effects represent within-subject changes over time with log-transformed KL-6 as the dependent variable (Table 6). In this LMM, the MUC1 genotype emerged as the strongest determinant of overall KL-6 levels. Estimated marginal means demonstrated significantly higher KL-6 concentrations in G/G carriers compared with A/A carriers (back-transformed EMMs approximately 542 U/mL vs. 348 U/mL; p < 0.001), whereas pwCF heterozygous for rs4072037 did not differ significantly from either group. Thus, the genotype primarily determined the baseline level of KL-6. Among clinical parameters, only interindividual ppFVC was independently associated with KL-6 (p < 0.001). No significant effects were observed for BMI, CRP, leukocytes, IgG, ppFEV1, or chronic exacerbation status in the overall model. The model explained 52.5% of the variance in KL-6 concentrations (marginal R2 = 0.525).
When focusing specifically on intraindividual changes over time, infectious exacerbation was the only significant predictor of KL-6 dynamics (p < 0.001) (Figure 2). EMMs showed higher KL-6 levels during exacerbation episodes compared with clinically stable phases (518 U/mL vs. 370 U/mL). The intraindividual model explained approximately 10% of the within-subject variance in KL-6. Time since baseline and all other time-varying clinical parameters were not significant (Table 7).
Genotype-stratified analyses confirmed that exacerbations were associated with significant intraindividual increases in KL-6 in both in pwCF homozygous of the A or the G allele (both p < 0.001). Additional associations with BMI and IgG were observed only in pwCF with the homozygous G genotype. However, no significant genotype-by-predictor interactions were detected overall.
Taken together, these findings indicate that the MUC1 genotype of rs4072037 determines the absolute KL-6 level and interindividual differences in ppFVC contribute to between-patient variability. In addition, infectious exacerbations drive short-term intraindividual fluctuations, which was independent of the MUC1 genotype.

4. Discussion

Our study demonstrates for the first time in pwCF that serum KL-6 concentrations are shaped by both genetic background and acute inflammatory events. The MUC1 rs4072037 genotype was the dominant determinant of baseline KL-6 levels, with homozygous polymorphic carriers showing higher concentrations than wildtype individuals, while interindividual differences in ppFVC further contributed to between-patient variability. Short-term intraindividual fluctuations were primarily driven by infectious exacerbations, independent of the genotype. Estimated marginal means indicated that acute increases during exacerbations explained ~10% of within-subject variance, whereas genotype and ppFVC accounted for ~52% of overall variance. This distinction between genetically determined baseline expression and inflammation-associated dynamics provides a novel perspective on KL-6 as a biomarker in chronic pulmonary disease.
KL-6 is a recognized biomarker for various interstitial and inflammatory lung diseases [11,12,13,15,16,18,19] and has also been linked to infectious processes [17] with emerging relevance in pwCF [14]. Consistent with previous studies, we observed significantly elevated mean KL-6 concentrations in pwCF compared to lung-healthy controls [11,12,14]. An earlier study by Bonella et al. demonstrated elevated serum KL-6 levels in pwCF compared with healthy controls and reported an inverse correlation with lung function parameters [14]. Although a small number of individuals overlapped between that cohort and the present study population, the majority of patients included here represent a distinct and independent cohort. Importantly, our findings confirm the previously reported association between KL-6 and lung function in pwCF and substantially extend these observations by incorporating longitudinal sampling and genotype-stratified analyses. In contrast to the earlier cross-sectional approach, the present study demonstrates that absolute KL-6 concentrations are predominantly determined by MUC1 genotype, whereas short-term intraindividual fluctuations are driven by infectious exacerbations. This integrated genetic and longitudinal perspective provides a more comprehensive understanding of KL-6 regulation in CF.
We found that a MUC1 polymorphism significantly influenced KL-6 concentrations in the serum. Individuals with the homozygous polymorphic allele exhibited markedly higher serum KL-6 levels than those with the wildtype genotype. Heterozygous individuals showed numerically intermediate KL-6 concentrations, but differences with either homozygous group were not statistically significant. This genotype-specific response suggests that host genetic factors may modulate epithelial cell turnover, mucin production, or biomarker clearance, contributing to individualized KL-6 profiles in pwCF [20,21,22,23,25]. The lack of statistical significance for the heterozygous pwCF for rs4072037 may be attributable to the low number of samples in this group.
Importantly, our longitudinal analyses revealed that KL-6 dynamics reflect both inter- and intraindividual processes. The MUC1 genotype of rs4072037 emerged as the strongest determinant of absolute KL-6 levels, with G/G homozygotes exhibiting markedly higher concentrations than A/A carriers. Interindividual differences in ppFVC additionally contributed to between-patient variability. Together, the model explained 52.5% of the overall variance in KL-6 concentrations, highlighting the dominant role of genotype and ppFVC differences among patients. The functional consequences of rs4072037 remain incompletely understood. Studies in pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, interstitial lung disease, and lung adenocarcinoma suggest genotype-dependent differences in MUC1 expression and KL-6 levels in related contexts [13,20,21,24].
Previous studies investigating the relationship between rs4072037 and KL-6 have largely focused on other pulmonary conditions such as pulmonary alveolar proteinosis [13] and interstitial lung diseases [20,21,22,23]. In antisynthetase syndrome-associated ILD, genotype-dependent differences in serum KL-6 levels have also been described [24]. In these settings, genotype-dependent differences in KL-6 concentrations were primarily interpreted as reflecting disease-specific alterations in alveolar epithelial injury or MUC1 expression [20,21]. Our study extends these observations to CF, a genetically determined, chronic suppurative lung disease with distinct pathophysiological mechanisms characterized by impaired mucociliary clearance, persistent infection, and neutrophil-dominated inflammation [2,5].
While earlier reports suggested that rs4072037 modulates baseline KL-6 expression in interstitial or malignant lung pathology [20,24], our findings demonstrate that this genetic influence is also evident in pwCF and remains the dominant determinant of absolute KL-6 levels even in the presence of chronic infection and structural lung damage. Importantly, we further show that the genotype status primarily determines interindividual baseline differences, whereas short-term intraindividual fluctuations are driven by infectious exacerbations. This differentiation between genetically determined baseline expression and inflammation-associated dynamics has not been described previously and adds a novel dimension to the interpretation of KL-6 as a biomarker.
Our study not only corroborates genotype-dependent KL-6 variation as observed in other pulmonary diseases [13,20,24], but also contextualizes it within the unique inflammatory and genetic landscape of CF. These findings highlight that KL-6 biology is not disease-specific per se, but may reflect an interaction between constitutive genetic regulation and superimposed epithelial stress [20,25]. Consequently, interpretation of KL-6 concentrations in clinical practice should account for both the underlying genotype and disease context.
In contrast, short-term intraindividual fluctuations in KL-6 were primarily driven by infectious exacerbations and were independent of the MUC1 SNP under study. Estimated marginal means showed transient increases during exacerbation episodes, with the intraindividual model explaining approximately 10% of within-subject variance. No other time-varying clinical parameters significantly influenced KL-6 dynamics. These findings underscore that KL-6 may be sensitive to acute epithelial stress while remaining largely stable under baseline conditions dictated by the underlying genetic background. In line with the principles of predictive and preventive medicine, serum KL-6 may have potential as an adjunctive biomarker for detecting early epithelial stress before functional decline becomes clinically apparent.
These results emphasize the importance of personalizing KL-6 interpretation in pwCF. Absolute cut-off values may be of limited utility, especially when genetic variation affects baseline concentrations. Instead, monitoring relative intraindividual changes may offer more clinically meaningful insights. Within the framework of precision medicine, KL-6 could thus support individualized therapy management by enabling early detection of physiological changes and guiding therapeutic decision-making [20,24].
KL-6 may help stratify patients according to their risk for functional decline or pulmonary complications and thereby support participatory care models through biomarker-guided monitoring. In this context, the potential value of genotype-based KL-6 levels for assessing the disease course or therapeutic response is of particular interest. However, genotype-specific analyses and the effect of treatment on serum KL-6 levels, including highly effective CFTR modulator therapies such as vanzacaftor/tezacaftor/deutivacaftor and elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor, were not addressed in the present study and need to be the subject of future investigations.
Despite these strengths, our study has several limitations. The genotype distribution of rs4072037 deviated from HWE in our cohort of pwCF, with a pronounced heterozygote deficiency. This contrasts with previous studies in other pulmonary and systemic conditions, including pulmonary alveolar proteinosis [13] and ASSD/ILD [24], where HWE conformity was reported. These were typically conducted in balanced 1:1 case–control designs and may more closely reflect general population allele frequencies. While the MAF in our control group corresponded to that expected for European populations, the MAF in pwCF was substantially lower, indicating that the deviation is specific to the CF group rather than a general genotyping artifact. Allele frequency data for rs4072037 in other cohorts of pwCF has previously not been investigated. Given the substantially larger number of pwCF compared to controls in our study, and the disease-specific nature of this cohort, violation of HWE assumptions due to disease-related selection, survival effects, or linkage to CF-relevant genetic backgrounds is plausible. SNP rs4072037 is located in the MUC1 gene encoding KL-6 and the observed significant association with KL-6 levels, a biologically meaningful effect within the CF population can be assumed. However, these findings require replication in independent CF cohorts to explore the potential underlying mechanisms. In addition, the retrospective design, limited observational period, small subgroups, and potential confounders such as heterogeneous time intervals between measurements and an ethnically non-diverse cohort must be considered when interpreting the results. Nonetheless, these findings support the hypothesis that KL-6 not only reflects pulmonary disease activity but is also influenced by genetic background. This highlights the biomarker’s promise in predictive, preventive, and personalized CF care. Future studies should prospectively validate KL-6 as a longitudinal biomarker and explore its integration into clinical routines across diverse populations.

5. Conclusions

This study demonstrates that serum KL-6 concentrations are elevated in pwCF compared with healthy controls and that these levels are influenced by a synonymous MUC1 SNP. Our findings underscore the dual nature of KL-6 as a biomarker: its baseline levels are largely determined by genetic factors and long-term development of ppFVC, while short-term intraindividual fluctuations reflect acute disease activity such as infectious exacerbations. These insights support the potential of KL-6 as a clinically relevant biomarker for CF, with applications in diagnosis, monitoring disease progression, and guiding personalized therapeutic strategies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: F.B., S.R., S.S. (Sivagurunathan Sutharsan), S.D.-T. and G.W.; methodology: S.R.; software: S.R.; validation, data acquisition; data curation: S.R. and S.D.-T.; writing—original draft preparation: S.R., S.S. (Sivagurunathan Sutharsan) and S.D.-T.; writing—review and editing: S.D.-T., S.R., G.W., J.O., M.S., S.S. (Svenja Straßburg), C.T., M.W., F.B. and S.S. (Sivagurunathan Sutharsan). All authors participated in the analysis and interpretation of study data, critically revising the manuscript for important intellectual content, and gave final approval of the manuscript for publication. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Medical writing assistance was provided by Nicola Ryan, an independent medical writer, and was funded by the University Medicine Essen-Ruhrlandklinik, Essen, Germany.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of Medizinische Fakultät der Universität Duisburg-Essen (protocol code 17-7677-BO, 14 August 2017).

Informed Consent Statement

Participants consented to the use of bioprobes and related data in the West German Biobank Essen (WBE). Patient consent also included permission for genomic investigation.

Data Availability Statement

The data analyzed in this study are not publicly available. The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author due to privacy, legal and ethical reasons.

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to the West German Biobank Essen for sample collection.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Francesco Bonella reports grants, consulting fees, honoraria, and travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi, Savara, Trevi, and Atyr (payments made to the author). All other authors declare no competing interests. Author Sarah Ricken is currently employed at Robert Bosch Krankenhaus GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany. This had no influence on the study design, data collection, analysis, or manuscript preparation.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
BMIBody mass index
CFCystic fibrosis
CFRDCF-related diabetes mellitus
CFTRCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance receptor
CRPC-reactive protein
EMMsEstimated marginal means
FEV1Forced expiratory volume in 1 s
HbA1cGlycosylated hemoglobin
IgGImmunoglobulin G
KL-6Krebs von den Lungen-6
LDHLactat dehyrodgenase
LMMsLinear mixed-effects models
MAFsMinor allele frequencies
MUC1Mucin-1
ppFEV1Percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s
ppFVCPercent predicted forced vital capacity
pwCFPeople with cystic fibrosis
SARS-CoV-2Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
SNPSingle nucleotide polymorphism
WBEWest German Biobank Essen

References

  1. Bell, S.C.; Mall, M.A.; Gutierrez, H.; Macek, M.; Madge, S.; Davies, J.C.; Burgel, P.R.; Tullis, E.; Castaños, C.; Castellani, C.; et al. The future of cystic fibrosis care: A global perspective. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020, 8, 65–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Elborn, J.S. Cystic fibrosis. Lancet 2016, 388, 2519–2531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Guo, J.; Garratt, A.; Hill, A. Worldwide rates of diagnosis and effective treatment for cystic fibrosis. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2022, 21, 456–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Anderson, M.P.; Gregory, R.J.; Thompson, S.; Souza, D.W.; Paul, S.; Mulligan, R.C.; Smith, A.E.; Welsh, M.J. Demonstration that CFTR is a chloride channel by alteration of its anion selectivity. Science 1991, 253, 202–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ratjen, F.; Bell, S.C.; Rowe, S.M.; Goss, C.H.; Quittner, A.L.; Bush, A. Cystic fibrosis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2015, 1, 15010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mall, M.A.; Elborn, J.S. Cystic Fibrosis (ERS Monograph); European Respiratory Society: Lausanne, Switzerland, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Heijerman, H.G.M.; McKone, E.F.; Downey, D.G.; Van Braeckel, E.; Rowe, S.M.; Tullis, E.; Mall, M.A.; Welter, J.J.; Ramsey, B.W.; McKee, C.M.; et al. Efficacy and safety of the elexacaftor plus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor combination regimen in people with cystic fibrosis homozygous for the F508del mutation: A double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2019, 394, 1940–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Karczewski, K.J.; Francioli, L.C.; Tiao, G.; Cummings, B.B.; Alföldi, J.; Wang, Q.; Collins, R.L.; Laricchia, K.M.; Ganna, A.; Birnbaum, D.P.; et al. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature 2020, 581, 434–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wainwright, C.E.; Elborn, J.S.; Ramsey, B.W.; Marigowda, G.; Huang, X.; Cipolli, M.; Colombo, C.; Davies, J.C.; De Boeck, K.; Flume, P.A.; et al. Lumacaftor-Ivacaftor in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis Homozygous for Phe508del CFTR. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 220–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  10. Keating, C.; Yonker, L.M.; Vermeulen, F.; Prais, D.; Linnemann, R.W.; Trimble, A.; Kotsimbos, T.; Mermis, J.; Braun, A.T.; O’Carroll, M.; et al. Vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor versus elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor in individuals with cystic fibrosis aged 12 years and older (SKYLINE Trials VX20-121-102 and VX20-121-103): Results from two randomised, active-controlled, phase 3 trials. Lancet Respir. Med. 2025, 13, 256–271, Erratum in Lancet Respir. Med. 2025, 13, e19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(25)00011-6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  11. d’Alessandro, M.; Bergantini, L.; Cameli, P.; Vietri, L.; Lanzarone, N.; Alonzi, V.; Pieroni, M.; Refini, R.M.; Sestini, P.; Bonella, F.; et al. Krebs von den Lungen-6 as a biomarker for disease severity assessment in interstitial lung disease: A comprehensive review. Biomark. Med. 2020, 14, 665–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Jehn, L.B.; Costabel, U.; Boerner, E.; Wälscher, J.; Theegarten, D.; Taube, C.; Bonella, F. Serum KL-6 as a biomarker of progression at any time in fibrotic interstitial lung disease. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bonella, F.; Ohshimo, S.; Miaotian, C.; Griese, M.; Guzman, J.; Costabel, U. Serum KL-6 is a predictor of outcome in pulmonary alveolar proteinosis. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2016, 8, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ohshimo, S.; Bonella, F.; Grammann, N.; Starke, K.; Cui, A.; Bauer, P.C.; Teschler, H.; Kohno, N.; Guzman, J.; Costabel, U. Serum KL-6 as a novel disease marker in adolescent and adult cystic fibrosis. Sarcoidosis Vasc. Diffus. Lung Dis. 2009, 26, 47–53. [Google Scholar]
  15. Stockhammer, P.; Baumeister, H.; Ploenes, T.; Bonella, F.; Theegarten, D.; Dome, B.; Pirker, C.; Berger, W.; Hegedüs, L.; Baranyi, M.; et al. Krebs von den Lungen 6 (KL-6) is a novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in pleural mesothelioma. Lung Cancer 2023, 185, 107360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kida, Y.; Ohshimo, S.; Ota, K.; Tamura, T.; Otani, T.; Une, K.; Sadamori, T.; Iwasaki, Y.; Bonella, F.; Hattori, N.; et al. KL-6, a human MUC1 mucin, as a prognostic marker for diffuse alveolar hemorrhage syndrome. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2012, 7, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kattner, S.; Sutharsan, S.; Berger, M.M.; Limmer, A.; Jehn, L.B.; Herbstreit, F.; Brenner, T.; Taube, C.; Bonella, F. Serum KL-6 as a candidate predictor of outcome in patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 6772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ohshimo, S.; Ishikawa, N.; Horimasu, Y.; Hattori, N.; Hirohashi, N.; Tanigawa, K.; Kohno, N.; Bonella, F.; Guzman, J.; Costabel, U. Baseline KL-6 predicts increased risk for acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir. Med. 2014, 108, 1031–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bessa, V.; Bonella, F.; Ohshimo, S.; Weinreich, G.; Kleibrink, B.; Costabel, U.; Aigner, C.; Kamler, M.; Taube, C.; Sommerwerck, U. Changes in serum KL-6 levels are associated with the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction in lung transplant recipients. Transpl. Immunol. 2019, 52, 40–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ishikawa, N.; Hattori, N.; Yokoyama, A.; Kohno, N. Utility of KL-6/MUC1 in the clinical management of interstitial lung diseases. Respir. Investig. 2012, 50, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kohno, N.; Awaya, Y.; Oyama, T.; Yamakido, M.; Akiyama, M.; Inoue, Y.; Yokoyama, A.; Hamada, H.; Fujioka, S.; Hiwada, K. KL-6, a mucin-like glycoprotein, in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from patients with interstitial lung disease. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1993, 148, 637–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ohnishi, H.; Yokoyama, A.; Kondo, K.; Hamada, H.; Abe, M.; Nishimura, K.; Hiwada, K.; Kohno, N. Comparative study of KL-6, surfactant protein-A, surfactant protein-D, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 as serum markers for interstitial lung diseases. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2002, 165, 378–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kobayashi, J.; Kitamura, S. KL-6: A serum marker for interstitial pneumonia. Chest 1995, 108, 311–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Remuzgo-Martínez, S.; Atienza-Mateo, B.; Ocejo-Vinyals, J.G.; Genre, F.; Pulito-Cueto, V.; Mora-Cuesta, V.M.; Iturbe-Fernández, D.; Lera-Gómez, L.; Pérez-Fernández, R.; Prieto-Peña, D.; et al. Role of MUC1 rs4072037 polymorphism and serum KL-6 levels in patients with antisynthetase syndrome. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 22574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  25. Hirasawa, Y.; Kohno, N.; Yokoyama, A.; Inoue, Y.; Abe, M.; Hiwada, K. KL-6, a human MUC1 mucin, is chemotactic for human fibroblasts. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 1997, 17, 501–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Cosentino, F.; Grant, P.J.; Aboyans, V.; Bailey, C.J.; Ceriello, A.; Delgado, V.; Federici, M.; Filippatos, G.; Grobbee, D.E.; Hansen, T.B.; et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD. Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, 255–323, Erratum in Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, 4317. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. KL-6 concentrations in pwCF (n = 174) compared with healthy controls (n = 30) at baseline. Mean concentrations are shown as a horizontal line. Statistical comparison was performed using the Mann–Whitney U test.
Figure 1. KL-6 concentrations in pwCF (n = 174) compared with healthy controls (n = 30) at baseline. Mean concentrations are shown as a horizontal line. Statistical comparison was performed using the Mann–Whitney U test.
Jcm 15 04555 g001
Figure 2. Longitudinal log(KL-6) trajectories (log U/mL) over days since baseline in patients with ≥2 measurements. We used a truncated y-axis to improve visualization of individual trajectories; the full scale does not include zero due to log transformation. Each colored line represents an individual pateint; blue points indicate stable periods, red points indicate infectious exacerbations.
Figure 2. Longitudinal log(KL-6) trajectories (log U/mL) over days since baseline in patients with ≥2 measurements. We used a truncated y-axis to improve visualization of individual trajectories; the full scale does not include zero due to log transformation. Each colored line represents an individual pateint; blue points indicate stable periods, red points indicate infectious exacerbations.
Jcm 15 04555 g002
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of pwCF at baseline of the entire cohort and separated dependent on the MUC1 genotype of rs4072037.
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of pwCF at baseline of the entire cohort and separated dependent on the MUC1 genotype of rs4072037.
Total
(n = 174)
MUC1 Genotypes of rs4072037 (n = 158)
A/A (n = 115)A/G (n = 5)G/G (n = 38)
Age, years [mean (SD)]32.3 (11.6)32 (11.6)34 (11.6)34 (12.1)
Gender, ref. male, n (%)102 (58.6)70 (60.9)2 (40.0)24 (63.2)
Body mass index, kg/m220.7 (3.4)21.5 (3.5)18.6 (2.0)20.5 (3.5)
    F508del mutation, n (%)
        Homozygous77 (44.3)49 (42.6)3 (60.0)17 (44.7)
        Compound heterozygous54 (31.0)36 (31.3)2 (40.0)12 (31.6)
        Other43 (24.7)30 (26.1)0 (0.0)9 (23,7)
Sweat chloride concentration test mean (SD), mmol/L93.0 (25.1)88.4 (24.1)78.0 (48.5)95.3 (23.6)
ppFEV156.7 (24.6)59.1 (25.0)49.1 (22.5)37.6 (13.7)
ppFVC76.1 (21.5)78.0 (21.6)54.8 (14.5)71.2 (21.3)
Pancreatic insufficiency, n (%)
      Yes156 (89.7)101 (87.8)5 (100.0)34 (89.5)
      No18 (10.3)14 (12.2)-4 (10.5)
Calprotectin, ng/mL284.6 (480.3)257.0 (453.9)21.0 (29.7)442.8 (600.0)
CF-related diabetes, n (%)78 (44.8)48 (41.7)3 (60.0)18 (47.4)
    Mean HbA1c, %5.5 (2.3)5.5 (2.4)5.5 (3.2)5.7 (1.7)
C-reactive protein, mg/dL 1.8 (2.8)1.61 (2.5)2.7 (2.5)2.3 (3.8)
Blood leukocytes, /nL9.9 (3.5)10.0 (3.5)8.4 (5.4)10.2 (3.2)
Serum IgG, g/L15.0 (4.8)14.8 (4.5)21.5 (5.0)15.4 (4.8)
Infectious exacerbation, n (%)
      Yes28 (16.1)16 (13.9)2 (40.0)9 (23.7)
      No146 (83.9)99 (86.1)3 (60.0)29 (76.3)
Microbial colonization in sputum, n (%)
    Pseudomonas aeruginosa34 (19.5)20 (17.4)2 (40.0)11 (28.9)
    Staphylococcus aureus18 (10.3)12 (10.4)0 (0.0)2 (5.3)
    Aspergillus fumigatus5 (2.9)4 (3.5)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
    Mycobacterium abscessus1 (0.6)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (2.6)
    Other microbial colonization8 (4.6)6 (5.2)0 (0.0)2 (5.3)
    Colonization with multiple organisms83 (47.7)55 (47.8)3 (60.0)19 (50.0)
    No colonization24 (13.8)17 (14.8)0 (0.0)3 (7.9)
Values are expressed as mean (SD) unless otherwise indicated. IgG, immunoglobulin G; ppFEV1, percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s; ppFVC, percent predicted forced vital capacity. CF, cystic fibrosis; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin.
Table 2. Genotype distribution, minor allele frequency (MAF), and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) of rs4072037 in healthy controls and pwCF.
Table 2. Genotype distribution, minor allele frequency (MAF), and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) of rs4072037 in healthy controls and pwCF.
CohortNA/AA/GG/GMAFHWE p-Value
Healthy controls3091290.500.27
pwCF1581155380.26<0.01
Total18812417470.32<0.01
Table 3. KL-6 concentrations dependent on rs4072037 at baseline. Pairwise comparisons were performed using Dunn–Bonferroni post hoc tests. Dominant model compares AA vs. A/G + G/G; recessive model compares AA + A/G vs. G/G.
Table 3. KL-6 concentrations dependent on rs4072037 at baseline. Pairwise comparisons were performed using Dunn–Bonferroni post hoc tests. Dominant model compares AA vs. A/G + G/G; recessive model compares AA + A/G vs. G/G.
GroupA/AA/GG/Gp-Values
Between-Group Comparison aPairwise Comparisons bDominant p (AA vs. A/G + G/G) aRecessive p (AA + A/G vs. G/G) a
pwCF (n = 158)396.94 ± 147.52522.65 ± 163.51672.16 ± 672.53<0.001A/A vs. A/G: 0.302
A/A vs. G/G: 0.000015
A/G vs. G/G: 1.000
<0.001<0.001
Controls (n = 30)250.56 ± 74.50266.50 ± 67.69337.22 ± 147.600.391A/A vs. A/G: 0.554
A/A vs. G/G: 0.297
A/G vs. G/G: 0.277
0.3310.197
Values are mean ± standard deviation. pwCF, people with cystic fibrosis. a Kruskal–Wallis test. b Dunn–Bonferroni test in pwCF; Kruskal–Wallis test in controls.
Table 4. Associations between KL-6 levels and clinical, inflammatory, and functional parameters at baseline.
Table 4. Associations between KL-6 levels and clinical, inflammatory, and functional parameters at baseline.
NKL-6 Mean ± SD (U/mL)Spearman ρ/Effect Sizep-Value
Body mass index, kg/m2169−0.304<0.001
Infectious exacerbation (yes vs. no)28/136560.6 ± 220.7 vs. 438.4 ± 381.9R = 0.28<0.001
C-reactive protein, mg/dL1650.429<0.001
Blood leukocytes, /nL1640.328<0.001
Serum IgG, g/L1110.2630.005
ppFVC163−0.610<0.001
ppFEV1163−0.608<0.001
Age, years1690.0780.313
Sex (male vs. female)98/71453.0 ± 178.0 vs. 465.0 ± 511.70.056
CFTRmutation (homozygous F508del, compound, other)75/52/42486.1 ± 490.7/445.4 ± 201.6/423.8 ± 184.70.749
Pancreatic insufficiency (yes vs. no), n (%)18/151436.1 ± 194.9 vs. 460.7 ± 372.00.838
Calprotectin, ng/mL13–140.4130.161
CF-related diabetes (yes vs. no)78/91501.6 ± 480.4 vs. 420.8 ± 193.30.066
HbA1c, %169–1740.1260.104
Sweat chloride concentration test, mmol/L
IgG, immunoglobulin G; ppFEV1, percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s; ppFVC, percent predicted forced vital capacity. CF, cystic fibrosis; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin.
Table 5. KL-6 correlations (Spearman-Rho, 95% CI, Fisher Z) for clinical parameters and group comparisons (mean ± SD, effect size R) by MUC1 genotype at baseline. Fisher Z comparisons were not calculated for groups with very small sample sizes (n ≤ 5) due to unreliable estimates.
Table 5. KL-6 correlations (Spearman-Rho, 95% CI, Fisher Z) for clinical parameters and group comparisons (mean ± SD, effect size R) by MUC1 genotype at baseline. Fisher Z comparisons were not calculated for groups with very small sample sizes (n ≤ 5) due to unreliable estimates.
MUC1 Genotype Spearman ρ/Mean ± SD95% CI/EffectFisher Z Comparisons (Z_diff, p)
Body mass index, kg/m2A/A (n = 112)−0.313−0.473 to −0.134A/A vs. G/G: −0.20, 0.841
A/A vs. A/G: 0.52, 0.605
G/G vs. A/G: 0.56, 0.574
G/G (n = 37)−0.277−0.552 to 0.052
A/G (n = 5)−0.600−0.969 to 0.600
C-reactive protein, mg/dLA/A (n = 112)0.4090.240 to 0.554A/A vs. G/G: −0.74, 0.458
A/A vs. A/G: 0.02, 0.988
G/G vs. A/G: 0.22, 0.829
G/G (n = 37)0.5230.240 to 0.724
A/G (n = 5)0.400−0.745 to 0.948
Blood leukocytes, /nlA/A (n = 112)0.2700.085 to 0.448A/A vs. G/G: −0.297, 0.766
A/A vs. A/G: −0.364, 0.716
G/G vs. A/G: −0.067, 0.947
G/G (n = 37)0.5190.260 to 0.724
A/G (n = 5)0.564−0.611 to 0.947
Serum IgG, g/LA/A (n = 112)0.3040.090 to 0.500A/A vs. G/G: 0.352, 0.725
A/A vs. A/G: -
G/G vs. A/G: -
G/G (n = 37)−0.038−0.392 to 0.327
A/G (n = 3)−1.000−1.000 to 1.000
ppFVCA/A (n = 112)−0.635−0.732 to −0.502A/A vs. G/G: 0.217, 0.828
A/A vs. A/G: −0.446, 0.656
G/G vs. A/G: −0.663, 0.507
G/G (n = 37)−0.750−0.882 to −0.548
A/G (n = 5)−0.300−0.941 to 0.708
ppFEV1A/A (n = 112)−0.591−0.713 to −0.455A/A vs. G/G: 0.227, 0.820
A/A vs. A/G: 0.015, 0.988
G/G vs. A/G: −0.212, 0.832
G/G (n = 37)−0.718−0.857 to −0.531
A/G (n = 5)−0.600−0.941 to 0.708
Infectious exacerbationA/A (n = 112)65.94 ± 0.457 vs. 53.12 ± 0.457R = −0.14, ns-
G/G (n = 37)26.44 ± 0.515 vs. 15.85 ± 0.515R = −0.44, p = 0.009-
A/G (n = 5)3.50 ± 0.837 vs. 1.50 ± 0.837R = −0.77, ns-
ns, not significant; IgG, immunoglobulin G; ppFEV1, percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s; ppFVC, percent predicted forced vital capacity.
Table 6. Longitudinal mixed-effects model of KL-6 concentration: inter- and intraindividual effects of clinical and genetic predictors.
Table 6. Longitudinal mixed-effects model of KL-6 concentration: inter- and intraindividual effects of clinical and genetic predictors.
Interindividual EffectIntraindividual Effect
PredictorF (df1, df2)p-ValueF (df1, df2)p-Value
MUC1 genotypeF(2, 216) = 19.77<0.001
Infectious exacerbationF(2, 216) = 3.020.051F(2, 216) = 0.500.607
Body mass indexF(1, 216) = 1.120.291F(1, 216) = 1.100.295
C-reactive proteinF(1, 216) = 1.280.260F(1, 216) = 0.080.772
Blood leukocytesF(1, 216) = 1.310.254F(1, 216) = 0.550.458
Serum IgGF(1, 216) = 3.280.071F(1, 216) = 0.060.803
ppFVCF(1, 216) = 15.79<0.001F(1, 216) = 0.010.938
ppFEV1F(1, 216) = 2.070.152F(1, 216) = 0.250.616
IgG, immunoglobulin G; ppFEV1, percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s; ppFVC, percent predicted forced vital capacity.
Table 7. Model-based regression analysis of intraindividual KL-6 concentration over time.
Table 7. Model-based regression analysis of intraindividual KL-6 concentration over time.
PredictorIntraindividual Comparison
F (df1, df2)p-Value
Days since baselineF(1, 131) = 0.5590.456
Infection exacerbationF(3, 131) = 3361.10<0.001
Body mass indexF(1, 131) = 1.7970.182
C-reactive proteinF(1, 131) = 0.5670.453
Blood leukocytesF(1, 131) = 1.2540.265
Serum IgGF(1, 131) = 0.0910.764
ppFVCF(1, 131) = 0.0570.812
ppFEV1F(1, 131) = 0.0190.892
IgG, immunoglobulin G; ppFEV1, percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s; ppFVC, percent predicted forced vital capacity.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ricken, S.; Dietz-Terjung, S.; Weinreich, G.; Ortiz, J.; Schedel, M.; Straßburg, S.; Taube, C.; Welsner, M.; Bonella, F.; Sutharsan, S. KL-6 as a Biomarker for Adult Patients with Cystic Fibrosis and the Impact of MUC1 Genotype. J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15, 4555. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15124555

AMA Style

Ricken S, Dietz-Terjung S, Weinreich G, Ortiz J, Schedel M, Straßburg S, Taube C, Welsner M, Bonella F, Sutharsan S. KL-6 as a Biomarker for Adult Patients with Cystic Fibrosis and the Impact of MUC1 Genotype. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2026; 15(12):4555. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15124555

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ricken, Sarah, Sarah Dietz-Terjung, Gerhard Weinreich, Jose Ortiz, Michaela Schedel, Svenja Straßburg, Christian Taube, Matthias Welsner, Francesco Bonella, and Sivagurunathan Sutharsan. 2026. "KL-6 as a Biomarker for Adult Patients with Cystic Fibrosis and the Impact of MUC1 Genotype" Journal of Clinical Medicine 15, no. 12: 4555. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15124555

APA Style

Ricken, S., Dietz-Terjung, S., Weinreich, G., Ortiz, J., Schedel, M., Straßburg, S., Taube, C., Welsner, M., Bonella, F., & Sutharsan, S. (2026). KL-6 as a Biomarker for Adult Patients with Cystic Fibrosis and the Impact of MUC1 Genotype. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 15(12), 4555. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15124555

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop