This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
The Impact of a Composite Cardiometabolic Burden on Body Contouring Outcomes: Is the Whole Greater than the Sum of Its Parts?
by
Ron Skorochod
Ron Skorochod 1,*,†
,
Nir Zontag
Nir Zontag 1,2,†
and
Yoram Wolf
Yoram Wolf 1,3
1
Unit of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera 3820302, Israel
2
Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
3
Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(11), 4094; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15114094 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 30 April 2026
/
Revised: 13 May 2026
/
Accepted: 20 May 2026
/
Published: 25 May 2026
Abstract
Background: Body contouring surgery is a critical aspect of reconstructive and esthetic care, addressing both functional and psychosocial needs. As the global prevalence of obesity and related metabolic disorders is constantly on the rise, it is inevitable that patients presenting for body contouring procedures would display comorbid cardiometabolic conditions that can negatively impact surgical outcomes. Clustered cardiometabolic abnormalities have been linked to increased rates of surgical complications, medical adverse events, prolonged hospitalization, and need for revision procedures. However, its impact on body contouring surgery outcomes remains insufficiently characterized. Materials and Methods: TriNetX Global Collaborative Network, comprising deidentified electronic medical records from over 170 healthcare organizations was utilized for this study. Adults undergoing body contouring surgery were stratified by the presence of a composite cardiometabolic burden, defined as the combination of obesity, diabetes mellitus and hypertension, in the year preceding surgery. Cohorts were matched 1:1 using propensity score matching based on baseline demographics, comorbidities, and substance use. Risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Outcomes were assessed at 30, 60, and 90 days postoperatively. Results: Among 188,164 body contouring patients, 6892 with composite cardiometabolic burden were propensity score–matched to controls. The study group was associated with significantly higher wound complications, surgical site infections, antibiotic use, and emergency department visits at 30, 60, and 90 days postoperatively, with no difference in hypertrophic scarring. Conclusions: Composite cardiometabolic burden, as defined in the study, demonstrated a significantly increased risk of adverse events following body contouring surgery, including wound-related morbidity, surgical site infection and increased healthcare utilization. These risks are evident from the early postoperative period and persist through at least the first 90 days after the procedure.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Skorochod, R.; Zontag, N.; Wolf, Y.
The Impact of a Composite Cardiometabolic Burden on Body Contouring Outcomes: Is the Whole Greater than the Sum of Its Parts? J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15, 4094.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15114094
AMA Style
Skorochod R, Zontag N, Wolf Y.
The Impact of a Composite Cardiometabolic Burden on Body Contouring Outcomes: Is the Whole Greater than the Sum of Its Parts? Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2026; 15(11):4094.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15114094
Chicago/Turabian Style
Skorochod, Ron, Nir Zontag, and Yoram Wolf.
2026. "The Impact of a Composite Cardiometabolic Burden on Body Contouring Outcomes: Is the Whole Greater than the Sum of Its Parts?" Journal of Clinical Medicine 15, no. 11: 4094.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15114094
APA Style
Skorochod, R., Zontag, N., & Wolf, Y.
(2026). The Impact of a Composite Cardiometabolic Burden on Body Contouring Outcomes: Is the Whole Greater than the Sum of Its Parts? Journal of Clinical Medicine, 15(11), 4094.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15114094
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.