Next Article in Journal
Clinical and Anatomical Spectrum of Meckel’s Diverticulum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Health-Related Quality of Life Changes in Patients with Digestive Cancers and Chronic Digestive Diseases: A Prospective, Multicenter Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 15
Issue 10
10.3390/jcm15103598
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Selected Parameters of the Mental State of Women with Endometriosis—A Systematic Review

by
Damian Zieliński
1,*,
Kamila Tokarczyk
1,* and
Magdalena Piegza
2
1
Student Scientific Club, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 42-612 Tarnowskie Góry, Poland
2
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 42-612 Tarnowskie Góry, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(10), 3598; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15103598
Submission received: 11 April 2026 / Revised: 27 April 2026 / Accepted: 29 April 2026 / Published: 8 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Mental Health)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

Background: Endometriosis is a chronic, estrogen-dependent inflammatory disorder affecting millions of women worldwide and constitutes a major cause of chronic pelvic pain and reduced quality of life. Increasing evidence suggests that the burden of the disease extends beyond physical symptoms and includes substantial psychological distress. This systematic review aimed to summarize current evidence regarding the association between endometriosis and mental health outcomes, including depression, anxiety, sleep disturbances, sexual dysfunction, and quality of life. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Europe PMC, and Google Scholar to identify studies published between 2015 and 2025 evaluating psychological outcomes in women diagnosed with endometriosis. Studies were screened according to predefined inclusion criteria and analyzed qualitatively. A total of 93 studies were included in the final review. Results: Women with endometriosis consistently demonstrated higher prevalence and severity of depressive symptoms and anxiety compared with control populations. Health-related quality of life was significantly reduced across studies. Chronic pelvic pain, particularly its intensity, persistence, and neuropathic-like characteristics, emerged as a key factor mediating the relationship between endometriosis and psychological distress. Additional contributors included sleep disturbances, fatigue, impaired sexual functioning, reduced self-esteem, and relationship difficulties. Emerging evidence also suggests that chronic inflammation, neuroimmune interactions, and gut–brain axis dysregulation may contribute to the coexistence of endometriosis and mood disorders. Conclusions: Endometriosis is associated with adverse mental health outcomes and reduced quality of life. These findings highlight the importance of multidisciplinary management strategies integrating pain control, psychological assessment, and psychosocial interventions to improve overall patient well-being.

1. Introduction

Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent disorder characterized by the presence of endometrial-like tissue outside the uterus. They can also line the peritoneal cavity, and deeply infiltrating lesions form in the pouch of Douglas [1]. In rare cases, it may also affect distant organs such as the lungs or brain [2]. It is characterized by chronic pain, autonomic disturbances such as bloating, nausea, fatigue, and, in some cases, may lead to fertility problems [3,4]. Endometriosis is a heterogeneous disease with three distinct phenotypes: superficial peritoneal endometrial lesions, ovarian endometrial cysts, and deep endometriotic lesions. A specific form of endometriosis, adenomyosis, can also be distinguished, in which lesions are located within the uterine muscle itself [5].
According to data collected by the World Health Organization (WHO), it is estimated that approximately 190 million women of reproductive age worldwide suffer from endometriosis (EM), making it the second most common gynecological disease. It is most often diagnosed in women aged 25 to 29, but the diagnostic process remains significantly delayed—the average time from the appearance of the first symptoms to diagnosis is approximately 10.4 years in Germany and 4.4 years in the United States [6].
In Poland, endometriosis poses a significant public health challenge. It is estimated that approximately one million women are affected by the disease, with the number of undiagnosed cases possibly reaching three million. Given the prevalence of this condition, delays in diagnosis, and limited access to adequate treatment, a new model for organizing and financing care for patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis was introduced on 1 July 2025. Medical facilities have been designated for diagnosis, procedures, surgeries, specialist consultations, and disease monitoring, with the costs covered by the National Health Fund [7]. The new reimbursement program offers hope for faster and better multi-specialty care—diagnostics, treatment, post-operative care, psychological support, and physiotherapy.
Endometriosis is associated not only with somatic symptoms, but also with social, economic and psychological consequences, often unnoticeable in the first phase of the disease [8]. Chronic pelvic pain can significantly reduce quality of life, lead to physical exhaustion, and contribute to the development of mental health problems, including depression and anxiety disorders [9]. For some patients, the severity of symptoms significantly impedes their professional functioning and education. Furthermore, pain can negatively impact intimate relationships and the sexual health of partners. Low public awareness of the symptoms and complications of endometriosis contributes to the downplaying of early signs of the disease, further delaying diagnosis and limiting the possibility of implementing effective treatment [10]. Growing evidence also suggests a complex relationship between endometriosis and psychological well-being. Chronic pain may mediate the development of mental disorders, and recent genetic studies suggest common mechanisms predisposing to the development of endometriosis and some mental disorders [11]. Understanding the symptoms of endometriosis and their impact on patients’ daily functioning can provide the basis for developing an integrated therapeutic approach, encompassing tools that support psychological coping with the disease and provide patients with essential information about their health [12].
This article provides a comprehensive review of the medical literature on endometriosis and its relationship to mental health, sexual health, and its social determinants. It also discusses possible interventions that could potentially improve the well-being of patients.

2. Materials and Methods

The review was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines). The process included defining eligibility criteria, a systematic database search, independent review of publications by two authors, and full-text analysis of selected articles. The review was not registered with PROSPERO. The PRISMA checklist is available in Supplementary Table S2.
Studies (2015–2025) on endometriosis and selected mental health parameters were included, including those examining depression, anxiety, quality of life, psychological effects of the disease, or sexual satisfaction in women with a confirmed diagnosis (clinically, surgically, or using questionnaires). Full-text publications in Polish or English of an observational nature were included, clinical trials, meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Extracted data included study design, sample size, population characteristics, and assessed mental health outcomes.
Studies were excluded if they lacked full text, had a sample size of <20, had no clearly defined purpose, involved animals, were conference abstracts, commentaries, letters, or protocols. Additionally, studies were excluded if they included patients with other chronic diseases or infertility, assessed only surgical outcomes without psychological analyses, and lacked key terms (depression, anxiety, mental health, endometriosis) or made the results difficult to interpret.
A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA), Europe PMC (European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, UK), and Google Scholar (Google LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA). The last search was conducted in December 2025. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers using a standardized data extraction form. Combinations of keywords and “AND” and “OR” terms were used, including “endometriosis,” “depression,” “anxiety,” “mental health,” “quality of life,” “sexual satisfaction,” and “psychological impact.” Search terms were based on both free-form phrases and MeSH terms. A detailed search strategy including combinations of keywords and MeSH terms was applied, and search strings are available upon request.
A total of 1160 records were identified across all databases. After removing duplicates and articles without full-text access, 866 papers remained. A qualitative synthesis of the included studies was performed. After an initial review of titles and abstracts, 116 articles were eligible for full-text review. Ultimately, 93 publications were included. The searches and initial reviews were conducted independently by two authors. The data extracted from the included studies were organized and summarized in a table presenting the key characteristics of each study, enabling comparison. The analysis was conducted narratively by grouping the results into thematic categories corresponding to the main research topics and presenting them in separate subsections. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies, no meta-analysis was performed, and a descriptive synthesis was applied to identify key trends and discrepancies. Results were stratified according to study design (observational studies vs. systematic reviews and meta-analyses) to avoid duplication of evidence. The methodological quality of included observational studies was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) which was conducted using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). The scale evaluates three domains: selection of study groups, comparability of groups and ascertainment of exposure or outcomes. Chronic pelvic pain was considered the most important confounding factor. NOS assessment was applied only to observational non-randomized studies; cross-sectional studies were assessed using the Adapted Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Secondary sources and randomized/interventional studies were not assessed with NOS. The entire selection process is presented in a flowchart compliant with PRISMA 2020. The tables included in the manuscript were prepared using Microsoft Word (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). The detailed flowchart for the selection process is provided in Figure 1.

3. Results

The majority of included studies were observational, while a smaller proportion consisted of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Findings from observational studies formed the primary basis of interpretation, whereas results from reviews were used to support and contextualize the observed associations.
Among the 93 records, 19 observational studies were assessed using NOS (summarized in Supplementary Table S1), 36 cross-sectional studies were assessed using adapted NOS (summarized in Supplementary Table S2) and 38 records were not assessed because NOS was not appropriate for their design. Of the assessed studies, 37 were categorized as high quality, 17 as moderate quality and 1 as low quality. Variability was observed mainly in the comparability domain, reflecting differences in adjustment for chronic pelvic pain and other confounding factors.

3.1. Psychosocial and Somatic Determinants of the Quality of Life of Women with Endometriosis

Endometriosis symptoms significantly impact patients’ functioning in almost all areas of life. Malenkul, in her systematic review, indicates that women are forced to plan their daily lives around their illness, which contributes to social withdrawal and reduced professional activity [13]. A prospective case–control study involving 2610 women showed that susceptibility to various pain syndromes and their severity negatively impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL), mood, anxiety and depressive symptoms, and work performance [14]. In the study by A. Ramin-Wright, depressive disorders were found in 27.9% of women with endometriosis and in 10.8% of the control group [15]. Increased levels of anxiety and depression also affect adolescents and young women with endometriosis, 33.4% of whom showed moderately severe levels of depressive symptoms [16]. In another study, using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, it was noted that beliefs about lower self-esteem among childless women correlated with poorer mental health, suggesting a potential direction for psychotherapeutic interventions [17]. Patients also frequently experience fatigue (50.7%) and insomnia (29.2%) [15]. The use of the Piper Fatigue Scale in a cross-sectional study revealed moderate fatigue in one-third and severe fatigue in half of the women studied. Fatigue was significantly associated with increased anxiety and depression, sleep disturbances, poorer sexual functioning, impaired gastrointestinal function, and reduced quality of life (p < 0.050) [18]. These symptoms were linked to pelvic pain, which correlated with other symptoms more strongly than the diagnosis of endometriosis itself [19]. Another systematic review and meta-analysis also confirmed these findings [20]. Due to their number, other results valuable for the research review are briefly described and presented in Table 1.

3.2. The Relationship Between Endometriosis Symptoms and Sexual Satisfaction and Partner Relationships

Analysis of available research indicates that endometriosis is a significant and independent risk factor for sexual dysfunction and reduced sexual satisfaction. Women with endometriosis are more likely to report pain during intercourse, avoid sexual activity, and have a lower quality of sexual life compared to women without endometriosis [47,48,49,50]. A study conducted in the Lebanese population showed a significant association between endometriosis and decreased sexual satisfaction, assessed using the Sexual Satisfaction Scale for Women (SSS-W). This association is explained by the influence of the cognitive model of negative expectations regarding sexual experiences, which in turn is explained by the central sensitization theory [49]. Central sensitization is a process in which excessive stimulation and persistent overreactivity of the central nervous system can lead to pain independent of peripheral stimuli. It is characterized by changes in the gray matter volume of structures responsible for pain modulation and neurochemical changes within the brain; therefore, it is possible for pain to recur in patients with endometriosis even in the absence of peripheral stimulation [51]. In a survey of 471 women with endometriosis, over 80% reported high levels of stress related to sexual activity and a negative perception of body image, which correlated with greater sexual distress. Self-compassion, in turn, served a protective function [52]. At the same time, research findings highlight the crucial role of emotional and cognitive factors. The severity of symptoms of depression, anxiety, and sexual distress, as well as the way one perceives one’s body and experiences pain, strongly correlates with the level of sexual distress and impaired quality of life. Not only the pain itself, but also its interpretation, fear of pain, and negative expectations of intercourse, exacerbate difficulties in engaging in sexual activity [48,49,53]. A study conducted at two university centers in Germany and Austria, involving 104 heterosexual couples, found strong emotional interdependence between partners. Higher levels of stress, anxiety, and depression in women correlated with greater pain intensity in men, and vice versa. Lower sexual satisfaction and a lack of social support were associated with greater pain severity [54]. Other studies also emphasize the importance of the quality of the partner relationship and social support in women with endometriosis. They show that relationship satisfaction, partner responsiveness, effective coping strategies, and a sense of support may partially mitigate the negative impact of endometriosis pain and symptoms on sexual functioning. Conflict, lack of understanding, and poor communication increase distress and the risk of persistent sexual problems [48,55,56]. Everyone agrees that including your partner in therapy, as well as the importance of emotional support and good communication, are key factors in managing the symptoms of endometriosis.

3.3. Potential Mechanisms Linking Endometriosis and Depression

The Importance of Pain and Inflammation in Endometriosis

Research indicates that many patients with endometriosis experience a type of pain that may resemble neuropathy. In the screening questionnaire pain DETECT, 40% of the study participants reported pain as neuropathic, while 35% reported mixed neuropathic-nociceptive pain. Patients with a dominant neuropathic component reported more intense pain, increased stress, and cognitive impairment [57]. These are the characteristics often observed in women with EM. Another study found that 79% of people with EM experienced sudden, paroxysmal episodes of pain, distinguishing them from cases of other neuropathic conditions [58].
Chronic menstrual pain leads to changes in the processing of nociceptive stimuli. In patients with dysmenorrhea, untreated pain recurs cyclically, leading to hyperalgesia, a lowered pain threshold, and concomitant hypersensitivity to mild stimuli. Neurotransmitter dysregulation, including excessive glutamate activation, influences the expansion of the nociceptive field and modulates symptoms of dyschezia, dysuria, and dyspareunia [59]. Persistent pain causes tension in the pelvic floor muscles, which in turn worsens pain, dysfunction and sexual problems [60]. Fear of pain can impair relaxation, exacerbating symptoms. Elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines: IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, and prostaglandins (PGE2) in patients with endometriosis lead to stimulation of splanchnic nerves, which also leads to increased pain perception. Chronic inflammation with accompanying nociceptor stimulation can lead to central changes, even in the absence of visible morphological changes, increasing the risk of developing chronic pain syndrome [61].
Our analysis of studies across diverse patient populations with EM revealed that chronic pain, not the severity of the disease, is a significant factor influencing women’s mental health. Studies describing various pain phenotypes indicated that specific pain profiles, such as noncyclical, diffuse, or high-intensity pain, are associated with higher levels of depression, anxiety, and greater limitations in social and occupational functioning [62,63,64,65,66].
Many publications have also noted that negative emotions can intensify the experience of pain, leading to a self-reinforcing cycle of interaction between pain symptoms and psychological well-being [67,68,69].
Additionally, numerous analyses have highlighted the importance of factors accompanying pain, such as fatigue, insomnia, low self-esteem, relationship problems and difficulties in sexual functioning, which may perpetuate and strengthen the symptoms of depressive syndrome [53,70,71,72,73].
Some studies have also suggested that chronic pain leaves a long-term impact on emotional functioning, regardless of the current disease state, indicating the possibility of a so-called “lasting pain mark” in patients [74,75].
In summary, the available data suggest that pain, particularly its nature, intensity, and chronicity, is the primary mediator of the relationship between endometriosis and mental disorders. However, the stage of endometriosis plays a secondary role. These results are consistent with previous clinical observations and indicate the need for a holistic therapeutic approach, encompassing both pain management and psychological support for patients with EM.

3.4. The Importance of the Gut–Brain Axis in the Pathogenesis of Mental Disorders in Patients with Endometriosis

Growing evidence suggests that alterations in the gut microbiome may play a role in the pathophysiology of endometriosis and its associated psychological burden [76,77]. Women with endometriosis demonstrate differences in gut microbiota composition and diversity, as shown in systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which may contribute to systemic inflammation and altered immune responses [78].
These findings are particularly relevant in the context of the gut–brain axis, a bidirectional communication system linking the gastrointestinal tract and the central nervous system. Dysregulation of this axis may influence emotional processing, stress response, and pain perception. Chronic inflammation and increased intestinal permeability observed in endometriosis may lead to activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis and sustained cortisol elevation, contributing to anxiety and depressive symptoms [79].
Additionally, gut microbiota produces neuroactive compounds such as serotonin, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), which are known to influence central nervous system function and emotional regulation [80].
Although the gut–brain axis has been widely studied in general populations, evidence specific to endometriosis remains limited and should be interpreted with caution. Further research is required to clarify causal relationships and underlying mechanisms.

3.5. Genetic and Epigenetic Relationships Between Endometriosis and Depression

The link between endometriosis and mood disorders, including depression, is increasingly being discussed, yet it remains poorly understood. In one meta-analysis, genomic analysis incorporating data from UK Biobank and FinnGen showed that the risk of several reproductive disorders, including endometriosis, is partially due to a common genetic factor and is significantly correlated with the risk of depression in women. These results may suggest common biological mechanisms linking endometriosis and other reproductive disorders to the risk of depression. These mechanisms include, among others, disturbances in estrogen signaling; variants in the ESR1 gene simultaneously affect the functioning of endometrial tissues and neuronal sensitivity to estrogen. This also has implications for mood regulation and changes in sex hormone regulation, which are associated with FSHB variants, which modulate the function of the hypothalamic–pituitary–ovarian axis [81]. Research indicates a frequent co-occurrence of endometriosis with psychiatric disorders, especially those with predominant anxiety and depressive symptoms. Women with EM in the study had a higher risk of depression (HR 1.48–1.56) and anxiety disorders (HR 1.38–1.44) [82]. Genetic analyses suggest that this association is not solely due to chronic pain but also has a biological basis. A common genetic etiology for endometriosis and depression has also been demonstrated, as well as the existence of common gene loci associated with these conditions [83].
The review of genetic analyses also included studies using Mendelian randomization (MRA), a genetic epidemiology method based on randomly inherited genetic variants. This approach allows for a rough estimation of possible causal relationships, but interpretation requires caution due to the risk of pleiotropy and the influence of confounding factors. The results indicate that genetic susceptibility to depression may be associated with an increased risk of endometriosis (OR ≈ 1.25) in some MRA analyses. However, the authors emphasize that due to the limitations of the method and the complexity of the endometriosis phenotype, these data cannot be considered unequivocal evidence of causality. Current evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggests that both conditions may share certain genetic components, which may partially explain their frequent co-occurrence [84].

3.6. Treatment Strategies and Psychotherapeutic Interventions

Currently, there is no effective causal treatment for endometriosis, and therapeutic methods largely focus solely on surgical removal of endometrial lesions, which is associated with a risk of disease recurrence of up to 40–50% over five years [85]. Symptomatic therapy includes gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues, danazol, an androgen derivative, and anti-inflammatory drugs, without taking into account the potential neuropathic mechanisms of chronic pain [57,85].
An analysis of five studies found that cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) provides long-term benefits for women with endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain. The use of psychoeducation and stress management techniques reduces pain, depressive symptoms, and stress levels, resulting in improved quality of life and psychological well-being. These results support the effectiveness of CBT as an adjunct therapy in alleviating both the physical and emotional symptoms of endometriosis [86].

3.7. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Psychological Interventions, Partner Role and Self-Acceptance in Patients with Endometriosis

Analysis of research findings on psychological interventions such as cognitive behavioral therapy, self-acceptance training, and couples therapy for women with endometriosis and their partners indicates that emotional support and these interventions significantly improve mental health and relationship functioning. Early studies have already shown that improved relationship quality is associated with reduced stress and better adaptation to disease symptoms [87]. Couples interventions increase relationship cohesion and reduce the psychological burden of pain [54].
Qualitative studies with a smaller sample size confirm that emotional support and education about the disease increase the sense of control over symptoms [70], and regular work with a psychologist reduces emotional tension [88]. In turn, analyses of large groups of patients (from several hundred to over eight hundred) indicate that psychological interventions alleviate symptoms of depression, anxiety, reduced quality of sexual life, and feelings of stigmatization [89,90,91].
One randomized trial showed that an intervention based on environmental enrichment (EE), which is structured, multifaceted stimuli that increase cognitive, sensory, and social activity, significantly reduced symptoms of anxiety and depression and improved quality of life while reducing stress levels in women with endometriosis. Compared to the control group, EE program participants scored lower on depression scales (including the HADS-7) both at the end of therapy and at a three-month follow-up. It was proven that the therapy improves self-esteem, reduces depression levels and increases the sense of empowerment [92]. Similar effects have been observed in studies on large populations, which emphasize the impact of therapy on reducing anxiety and improving quality of life [93]. A three-month program based on cognitive behavioral therapy and quality of life indicators, developed by Z. Breton et al., demonstrated that multidisciplinary self-management tools can be helpful in reducing symptoms, anxiety, and neuropathic pain [43].

4. Discussion

Endometriosis is a disease that should be considered from a multidimensional perspective and continues to pose a significant clinical problem. Its consequences extend beyond the reproductive system and, as evidenced by the data cited above, also affect the psychological and social spheres [8,11,13,23,24,38]. Chronic pelvic pain—one of the main symptoms of endometriosis—correlates with higher levels of anxiety and depression, poorer sleep quality, sexual dysfunction, and reduced quality of life [9,19,20,27,64]. A prolonged time from symptom onset to diagnosis further increases psychological burden and worsens prognosis [13,14,29,33,41]. The coexistence of endometriosis and mental disorders is multifactorial. It includes biological factors (chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, genetic and epigenetic conditions) [6,61,78,81,84], psychological factors (pain catastrophization, anticipatory anxiety) [21,53,63,73], and social factors (stigma, social isolation) [40,44,45]. Increasing evidence also indicates a partially common biological basis for endometriosis and depression [81,82,83,84]. An additional factor worsening the quality of life of women with EM is sexual dysfunction, which negatively impacts partner relationships and the emotional well-being of patients [49,50,54]. Therefore, it is crucial to implement integrated care models encompassing not only surgical and pharmacological treatment but also psychological and psychosocial interventions [11,23,38]. Early identification of anxiety and depressive symptoms and access to interdisciplinary care can significantly improve prognosis, reduce pain intensity, and increase patients’ quality of life [86,89,91,93]. Although not included in this review due to strict exclusion criteria aimed at minimizing confounding, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) may represent a clinically relevant comorbidity in women with endometriosis. Given its established association with mental health outcomes, future studies should explore the potential role of sleep-disordered breathing in this population [94].
This study has several strengths. First, a comprehensive and systematic search strategy was applied across multiple databases, ensuring broad coverage of the available literature. Second, the inclusion of a large number of studies enhanced the robustness and generalizability of the findings. Third, efforts were made to minimize bias by applying predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the evaluation of scientific papers was done using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.
However, several limitations should be acknowledged. The study was not registered in PROSPERO, which may increase the risk of selection bias. The included studies were heterogeneous in terms of design, population characteristics, and outcome measures, which may affect the comparability of results. Additionally, most studies were observational, limiting the ability to infer causality, and the quality of included studies varied. The exclusion of studies involving comorbid conditions, while necessary to reduce confounding, may limit the generalizability of the findings to real-world clinical populations. Despite these limitations, the findings provide valuable insight into the relationship between endometriosis and mental health.

5. Conclusions

The review findings emphasize the need for an integrated therapeutic approach, combining medical treatment with psychological and educational interventions, and elements of social support. Cognitive-behavioral therapies, self-care programs, couples work, and techniques that enhance self-acceptance can significantly reduce the severity of psychopathological symptoms and improve quality of life and relationship functioning in women with endometriosis. Table 2 summarizes the health and psychosocial consequences of endometriosis.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm15103598/s1, Table S1. Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS), Table S2. Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) adapted for cross-sectional studies, and PRISMA checklist [95,96].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.Z., K.T. and M.P.; methodology, D.Z. and K.T.; software, D.Z. and K.T.; validation, D.Z., K.T. and M.P.; formal analysis, D.Z. and K.T.; investigation, D.Z. and K.T.; data curation, D.Z. and K.T.; writing—original draft preparation, D.Z., K.T. and M.P.; writing—review and editing, D.Z., K.T. and M.P.; visualization, D.Z. and K.T.; supervision, M.P.; D.Z. and K.T. contributed equally to the work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available in the primary research articles cited in the References section.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

CBTCognitive Behavioral Therapy
CNSCentral Nervous System
DETECTNeuropathic Pain DETECT Questionnaire
EEEnvironmental Enrichment
EMEndometriosis
GABAGamma-Aminobutyric Acid
GnRHGonadotropin-Releasing Hormone
HADS-7Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-7
HPAHypothalamic–Pituitary–Adrenal
HRQoLHealth-Related Quality of Life
IL-6Interleukin 6
IL-8Interleukin 8
MeSHMedical Subject Headings
MRAMendelian Randomization Analysis
OROdds Ratio
PGE2Prostaglandin E2
PMCPubMed Central
PRISMAPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
PROSPEROInternational Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews
SCFAsShort-Chain Fatty Acids
SSS-WSexual Satisfaction Scale for Women
TNF-αTumor Necrosis Factor Alpha
UKUnited Kingdom
WHOWorld Health Organization

References

  1. Cousins, F.L.; McKinnon, B.D.; Mortlock, S.; Fitzgerald, H.C.; Zhang, C.; Montgomery, G.W.; Gargett, C.E. New concepts on the etiology of endometriosis. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2023, 49, 1090–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chandel, P.K.; Maurya, P.K.; Hussain, S.; Vashistha, D.; Sharma, S. Endometriosis and Depression: A Double Agony for Women. Ann. Neurosci. 2023, 30, 205–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. van Stein, K.; Schubert, K.; Ditzen, B.; Weise, C. Understanding Psychological Symptoms of Endometriosis from a Research Domain Criteria Perspective. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 4056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rosendo-Chalma, P.; Díaz-Landy, E.N.; Antonio-Véjar, V.; Ortiz Tejedor, J.G.; Reytor-González, C.; Simancas-Racines, D.; Bigoni-Ordóñez, G.D. Endometriosis: Challenges in Clinical Molecular Diagnostics and Treatment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 3979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kedzia, M.; Basta, P.; Czajkowski, K.; Gogacz, M.; Spaczynski, R.; Mroczkowska, B.; Stojko, R.; Szaflik, T.; Szubert, M.; Szyllo, K.; et al. Guidelines of the Polish Society of Gynecologists and Obstetricians on the management of women with endometriosis. Ginekol. Pol. 2024, 95, 729–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sherwani, S.; Khan, M.W.A.; Rajendrasozhan, S.; Al-Motair, K.; Husain, Q.; Khan, W.A. The vicious cycle of chronic endometriosis and depression—An immunological and physiological perspective. Front. Med. 2024, 11, 1425691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dla Pacjenta. Narodowy Fundusz Zdrowia (NFZ)—Finansujemy Zdrowie Polaków. Available online: https://www.gov.pl/web/zdrowie/leczenie-endometriozy--bezplatna-kompleksowa-opieka (accessed on 15 November 2025).
  8. Czubak, P.; Herda, K.; Niewiadomska, I.; Putowski, L.; Łańcut, M.; Masłyk, M. Understanding Endometriosis: A Broad Review of Its Causes, Management, and Impact. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 8878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Muharam, R.; Amalia, T.; Pratama, G.; Harzif, A.K.; Agiananda, F.; Maidarti, M.; Azyati, M.; Sumapraja, K.; Winarto, H.; Wiweko, B.; et al. Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women with Endometriosis is Associated with Psychiatric Disorder and Quality of Life Deterioration. Int. J. Women’s Health 2022, 14, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. World Health Organization. Endometriosis. 2025. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/endometriosis (accessed on 31 March 2025).
  11. Zippl, A.L.; Reiser, E.; Seeber, B. Endometriosis and mental health disorders: Identification and treatment as part of a multimodal approach. Fertil. Steril. 2024, 121, 370–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Maulenkul, T.; Kuandyk, A.; Makhadiyeva, D.; Dautova, A.; Terzic, M.; Oshibayeva, A.; Moldaliyev, I.; Ayazbekov, A.; Maimakov, T.; Saruarov, Y.; et al. Understanding the impact of endometriosis on women’s life: An integrative review of systematic reviews. BMC Women’s Health 2024, 24, 524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mousa, M.; Al-Jefout, M.; Alsafar, H.; Becker, C.M.; Zondervan, K.T.; Rahmioglu, N. Impact of Endometriosis in Women of Arab Ancestry on: Health-Related Quality of Life, Work Productivity, and Diagnostic Delay. Front. Glob. Women’s Health 2021, 2, 708410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ramin-Wright, A.; Schwartz, A.S.K.; Geraedts, K.; Rauchfuss, M.; Wölfler, M.M.; Haeberlin, F.; von Orelli, S.; Eberhard, M.; Imthurn, B.; Imesch, P.; et al. Fatigue—A symptom in endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. 2018, 33, 1459–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. González-Echevarría, A.M.; Rosario, E.; Acevedo, S.; Flores, I. Impact of coping strategies on quality of life of adolescents and young women with endometriosis. J. Psychosom. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 40, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Facchin, F.; Buggio, L.; Dridi, D.; Vercellini, P. A woman’s worth: The psychological impact of beliefs about motherhood, female identity, and infertility on childless women with endometriosis. J. Health Psychol. 2021, 26, 1026–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mundo-López, A.; Ocón-Hernández, O.; San-Sebastián, A.P.; Galiano-Castillo, N.; Rodríguez-Pérez, O.; Arroyo-Luque, M.S.; Arroyo-Morales, M.; Cantarero-Villanueva, I.; Fernández-Lao, C.; Artacho-Cordón, F.; et al. Contribution of Chronic Fatigue to Psychosocial Status and Quality of Life in Spanish Women Diagnosed with Endometriosis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Facchin, F.; Buggio, L.; Roncella, E.; Somigliana, E.; Ottolini, F.; Dridi, D.; Roberto, A.; Vercellini, P. Sleep disturbances, fatigue and psychological health in women with endometriosis: A matched pair case–control study. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2021, 43, 1027–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Facchin, F.; Barbara, G.; Saita, E.; Mosconi, P.; Roberto, A.; Fedele, L.; Vercellini, P. Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and mental health: Pelvic pain makes the difference. J. Psychosom. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015, 36, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kalfas, M.; Chisari, C.; Windgassen, S. Psychosocial factors associated with pain and health-related quality of life in Endometriosis: A systematic review. Eur. J. Pain 2022, 26, 1827–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Matasariu, R.D.; Mihaila, A.; Iacob, M.; Dumitrascu, I.; Onofriescu, M.; Crumpei Tanasa, I.; Vulpoi, C. Psycho-Social Aspects of Quality of Life in Women with Endometriosis. Acta Endocrinol. 2017, 13, 334–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dipankar, S.P.; Kushram, B.; Unnikrishnan, P.; Gowda, J.R.; Shrivastava, R.; Daitkar, A.R.; Jaiswal, V. Psychological Distress and Quality of Life in Women with Endometriosis: A Narrative Review of Therapeutic Approaches and Challenges. Cureus 2025, 17, e80180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Delanerolle, G.; Ramakrishnan, R.; Hapangama, D.; Zeng, Y.; Shetty, A.; Elneil, S.; Chong, S.; Hirsch, M.; Oyewole, M.; Phiri, P.; et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Endometriosis and Mental-Health Sequelae; The ELEMI Project. Women’s Health 2021, 17, 17455065211019717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chaggar, P.; Tellum, T.; Thanatsis, N.; De Braud, L.V.; Setty, T.; Jurkovic, D. Impact of deep or ovarian endometriosis on pelvic pain and quality of life: Prospective cross-sectional ultrasound study. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2025, 65, 372–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Baldi, E.; Meneo, D.; Cerolini, S.; Gelfo, F.; Baglioni, C. Sleep Health and Psychological Wellbeing in Adult Women: A Specific Focus on Endometriosis—A Survey Study. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. He, G.; Chen, J.; Peng, Z.; Feng, K.; Luo, C.; Zeng, X. A study on the correlation between quality of life and unhealthy emotion among patients with endometriosis. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 830698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Olliges, E.; Bobinger, A.; Weber, A.; Hoffmann, V.; Schmitz, T.; Popovici, R.M.; Meissner, K. The physical, psychological, and social day-to-day experience of women living with endometriosis compared to healthy age-matched controls—A mixed-methods study. Front. Glob. Women’s Health 2021, 2, 767114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kogelman, L.J.A.; Rytter, D.; Hummelshoj, L.; Hansen, K.E.; Kirk, U.B.; Beauchamp, J.L.; Bay, J.T.; Bruun, M.T.; Brøns, N.; Erikstrup, C.; et al. The burden of endometriosis on quality of life in Danish women: An analysis of the Danish Blood Donor Study. BMC Med. 2025, 23, 560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Mallorquí, A.; Fortuna, A.; Segura, E.; Cardona, G.; Espinosa, M.; Quintas-Marquès, L.; Gracia, M.; Angulo-Antúnez, E.; Carmona, F.; Martínez-Zamora, M.-A. Prevalence of anhedonia in women with deep endometriosis. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mollazadeh, S.; Najmabadi, K.M.; Mirghafourvand, M.; Khadivzadeh, T.; Moghri, J.; Hafizi, L. The health-promoting lifestyle and its relationship with the impacts of endometriosis on women’s lives in Iran, 2022: A cross-sectional study. BMC Women’s Health 2025, 25, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Manu, A.; Poenaru, E.; Duica, F.; Bausic, A.I.G.; Coroleuca, B.C.; Coroleuca, C.A.; Iacob, C.; Rosca, I.; Bratila, E. Quality of Life Assessment and Clinical Implications for Women with Endometriosis Through Validated Tools: A Narrative Review. Medicina 2025, 61, 1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mosterd, D.; Mikocka-Walus, A.; Van Niekerk, L.; Skvarc, D.; Evans, S. Comparing psychological distress, health-related quality of life and pain in people diagnosed with endometriosis and those suspected to have endometriosis. Res. Sq. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Salinas-Asensio, M.D.M.; Álvarez-Salvago, F.; Mundo-López, A.; Ocón-Hernández, O.; Lozano-Lozano, M.; López-Garzón, M.; Postigo-Martín, P.; Arroyo-Morales, M.; Rodríguez-Ruiz, Á.; Fernández-Lao, C.; et al. Changes in fatigue, health-related fitness, sleep quality, mental health, gastrointestinal complaints and sexual function after a multimodal supervised therapeutic exercise program in women with endometriosis unresponsive to conventional therapy: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2025, 312, 114083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kovács-Szabó, Z.; Ács, P.; Prémusz, V.; Makai, A.; Hock, M. Psychological, Symptom-Related, and Lifestyle Predictors of Health-Related Quality of Life in Hungarian Women with Endometriosis. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 7004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bień, A.; Pokropska, A.; Grzesik-Gąsior, J.; Korżyńska-Piętas, M.; Pieczykolan, A.; Zarajczyk, M.; Ali Pour, R.; Frydrysiak-Brzozowska, A.; Rzońca, E. Quality of life in women with endometriosis: The importance of Socio-demographic, diagnostic-therapeutic, and psychological factors. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 4268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Vallée, A.; Arutkin, M.; Ceccaldi, P.F.; Ayoubi, J.M. Quality of life identification by unsupervised cluster analysis: A new approach to modelling the burden of endometriosis. PLoS ONE 2025, 20, e0317178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Noditi, A.R.; Bostan, I.S.; Scurtu, F.; Ionescu, D.; Mehedintu, A.M.; Petca, A.; Mehedintu, C.; Bostan, M.; Rotaru, A.M. Analysis of the Biopsychosocial Impacts Associated with Endometriosis to Improve Patient Care. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 2158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Panvino, F.; Paparella, R.; Pisani, F.; Tarani, F.; Ferraguti, G.; Fiore, M.; Ardizzone, I.; Tarani, L. Endometriosis in adolescence: A narrative review of the psychological and clinical implications. Diagnostics 2025, 15, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Katz, C.; Evans, S.; Mikocka-Walus, A. “Listen to women as if they were your most cherished person”: Australian women’s perspectives on living with the pain of endometriosis: A mixed-methods study. J. Health Psychol. 2025, 30, 1899–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kaveh, M.; Moghadam, M.N.; Safari, M.; Chaichian, S.; Kashi, A.M.; Afshari, M.; Sadegi, K. The impact of early diagnosis of endometriosis on quality of life. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2025, 311, 1415–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cagnacci, A.; Della Vecchia, E.; Xholli, A. Chronic pelvic pain improvement: Impact on quality of life and mood. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2019, 35, 502–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Breton, Z.; Stern, E.; Pinault, M.; Lhuillery, D.; Petit, E.; Panel, P.; Alexaline, M. A Digital Program for Daily Life Management with Endometriosis: Pilot Cohort Study on Symptoms and Quality of Life Among Participants. JMIR Form. Res. 2025, 9, e58262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Grundström, H.; Engman, L.; Rimhagen, E.; Söderstierna, C.; Flink, I. Experiences of communication in women with endometriosis: Perceived validation and invalidation in different contexts, and associations with health-related quality of life. J. Psychosom. Obstet. Gynecol. 2023, 44, 2264483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zarecki, C.; Satran, C.; Kaldawy, A.; Tesler, R.; Bord, S. Understanding the role of social negativity in Perceived Life Course Impact and mental health among women with Endometriosis. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 4761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kupec, T.; Kennes, L.N.; Senger, R.; Meyer-Wilmes, P.; Najjari, L.; Stickeler, E.; Wittenborn, J. The multifactorial burden of endometriosis: Predictors of quality of life. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bień, A.; Pokropska, A.; Grzesik-Gąsior, J.; Korżyńska-Piętas, M.; Zarajczyk, M.; Rzońca, E.; Jurek, K. Clinical factors affecting the quality of life of women with endometriosis. J. Adv. Nurs. 2025, 81, 4667–4680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kling, J.M.; Ghaith, S.; Smith, T.; Kapoor, E.; Wasson, M.; Mara, K.; Enders, F.T.; Faubion, S.; Kuhle, C. Evaluating the Link Between Self-Reported Endometriosis and Female Sexual Dysfunction. J. Sex. Med. 2022, 19, 1553–1561, Correction in J. Sex Med. 2023, 20, 707–708.. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kfoury, M.; Barakat, H.; Hallit, S.; Saliba, S. Association between endometriosis and sexual satisfaction among a sample of lebanese women. BMC Women’s Health 2023, 23, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Amza, M.; Sima, R.M.; Conea, I.M.; Bobei, T.I.; Augustin, F.E.; Pleş, L. The impact of endometriosis on patients’ quality of sexual life. J. Med. Life 2025, 18, 90–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Chapron, C.; Marcellin, L.; Borghese, B.; Santulli, P. Rethinking mechanisms, diagnosis and management of endometriosis. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2019, 15, 666–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sullivan-Myers, C.; Sherman, K.A.; Beath, A.P.; Cooper, M.J.W.; Duckworth, T.J. Body image, self-compassion, and sexual distress in individuals living with endometriosis. J. Psychosom. Res. 2023, 167, 111197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Pasternack, S.; Suvilehto, J.; Härkki, P.; Heikinheimo, O.; Sipilä, R.; Kalso, E. Pain, Emotions, Interoception, and Bodily Sensations in Patients with Endometriosis. Eur. J. Pain 2025, 29, e70144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Schick, M.; Germeyer, A.; Böttcher, B.; Hecht, S.; Geiser, M.; Rösner, S.; Eckstein, M.; Vomstein, K.; Toth, B.; Strowitzki, T.; et al. Partners matter: The psychosocial well-being of couples when dealing with endometriosis. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2022, 20, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Facchin, F.; Buggio, L.; Vercellini, P.; Frassineti, A.; Beltrami, S.; Saita, E. Quality of intimate relationships, dyadic coping, and psychological health in women with endometriosis: Results from an online survey. J. Psychosom. Res. 2021, 146, 110502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chen, J.; Ge, Y.; Jin, X.; Huang, H.; Shan, X.; Xu, X. The mediating effect of social support on the relationship between intimacy and perceived partner responsiveness in endometriosis women of childbearing age. Front. Psychol. 2024, 15, 1437335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Coxon, L.; Wiech, K.; Vincent, K. Is There a Neuropathic-Like Component to Endometriosis-Associated Pain? Results from a Large Cohort Questionnaire Study. Front. Pain Res. 2021, 2, 743812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Cerruto, M.A. Chronic Pelvic Pain and Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: Classification and Epidemiology. In Chronic Pelvic Pain and Pelvic Dysfunctions; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 49–60. [Google Scholar]
  58. Hoffman, D. Central and peripheral pain generators in women with chronic pelvic pain: Patient centered assessment and treatment. Curr. Rheumatol. Rev. 2015, 11, 146–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Aredo, J.V.; Heyrana, K.J.; Karp, B.I.; Shah, J.P.; Stratton, P. Relating Chronic Pelvic Pain and Endometriosis to Signs of Sensitization and Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction. Semin. Reprod. Med. 2017, 35, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Gruber, T.M.; Mechsner, S. Pathogenesis of Endometriosis: The Origin of Pain and Subfertility. Cells 2021, 10, 1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kanti, F.S.; Allard, V.; Métivier, A.-A.; Lemyre, M.; Arendas, K.; Maheux-Lacroix, S. Pain Phenotypes in Endometriosis: A Population-Based Study Using Latent Class Analysis. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2025, 132, 492–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Rodríguez-Lozano, D.C.; Meza-Rodríguez, M.D.P.; Cruz-Orozco, O.P.; Sánchez-Ramírez, B.; Olguin-Ortega, A.; Silvestri-Tomassoni, J.R.; Corona-Barsse, G.; Escobar-Ponce, L.F.; Solis Paredes, J.; Dominguez-Trejo, B.; et al. Emotional dysregulation in women with endometriosis with cyclical and non-cyclical chronic pelvic pain. BMC Women’s Health 2022, 22, 525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Goodwin, E.; do Valle, H.; Nitschke, A.S.; Puyat, J.H.; Yong, P.J.; Hanley, G.E. Endometriosis, symptoms, and risk for depression and/or anxiety: A population-based retrospective study. BMC Women’s Health 2025, 25, 479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Moore, C.; Cogan, N.; Williams, L. Illness perceptions among individuals with endometriosis and their longitudinal associations with psychological distress and pain. J. Health Psychol. 2025, 30, 4284–4297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Jiang, L.; Jiang, L.; Ma, S. Bidirectional Mendelian randomization and cross-sectional study reveal depression as a causal risk factor for endometriosis. Medicine 2025, 104, e45729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. van Barneveld, E.; de Hertogh, M.; Vork, L.; van Hanegem, N.; van Osch, F.H.M.; Kruimel, J.W.; Bongers, M.Y.; Leue, C.; Lim, A.C. Patient-specific affect-abdominal pain interactions in endometriosis: An experience sampling method (ESM) study. J. Psychosom. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022, 43, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Quintas-Marquès, L.; Valdés-Bango, M.; Box, C.; Gràcia, M.; Rius, M.; Carmona, F.; Martínez-Zamora, M. Multidimensional Evaluation of Myofascial Pelvic Pain and Other Comorbidities in Endometriosis Patients. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 3455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Gouesbet, S.; Lambert, S.; Amazouz, H.; Breton, Z.; Tran, V.T.; Missmer, S.; Kvaskoff, M. Retrospective Assessment of Endometriosis Pain Over the Life Course: A Reliability Study Within the ComPaRe-Endometriosis Cohort. Eur. J. Pain 2025, 29, e70040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Vuontisjärvi, S.; Rossi, H.R.; Herrala, S.; Morin-Papunen, L.; Tapanainen, J.S.; Karjula, S.; Karppinen, J.; Auvinen, J.; Piltonen, T.T. The Long-Term Footprint of Endometriosis: Population-Based Cohort Analysis Reveals Increased Pain Symptoms and Decreased Pain Tolerance at Age 46 Years. J. Pain 2018, 19, 754–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kupec, T.; Wagels, L.; Caspers, R.; Meyer-Wilmes, P.; Najjari, L.; Stickeler, E.; Wittenborn, J. Predictors of anxiety in endometriosis patients. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2025, 311, 1371–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Viscardi, M.F.; Piacenti, I.; Musella, A.; Cacciamani, L.; Piccioni, M.G.; Manganaro, L.; Muzii, L.; Porpora, M.G. Endometriosis in Adolescents: A Closer Look at the Pain Characteristics and Atypical Symptoms: A Prospective Cohort Study. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Pickup, B.; Sharpe, L.; Todd, J. Development of the COMPASS model of endometriosis: A COmprehensive model of pain encompassing agency, systemic factors and sense making. Br. J. Health Psychol. 2025, 30, e12794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Berryman, A.; Machado, L. Cognitive Functioning in Females with Endometriosis-Associated Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Literature Review. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 2025, 40, 1066–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Breton, Z.; Gouesbet, S.; Amazouz, H.; Schoefs, H.; Tran, V.T.; Falissard, B.; Corruble, E.; Kvaskoff, M. Factors associated with anxiety and depression symptoms among women with endometriosis: A cross-sectional study within the ComPaRe-Endometriosis cohort. J. Psychosom. Res. 2025, 196, 112329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Winter, G.; Hart, R.A.; Charlesworth, R.P.G.; Sharpley, C.F. Gut microbiome and depression: What we know and what we need to know. Rev. Neurosci. 2018, 29, 629–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Yuanyue, L.; Qian, H.; Ling, L.; Liufeng, Y.; Jing, G.; Xiaomei, W. Impact of gut microbiota on endometriosis: Linking physical injury to mental health. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2025, 15, 1526063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Kiewa, J.; Mortlock, S.; Meltzer-Brody, S.; Middeldorp, C.; Wray, N.R.; Byrne, E.M. A Common Genetic Factor Underlies Genetic Risk for Gynaecological and Reproductive Disorders and Is Correlated with Risk to Depression. Neuroendocrinology 2023, 113, 1059–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Yuanyue, L.; Dimei, O.; Ling, L.; Dongyan, R.; Xiaomei, W. Association between endometriosis and gut microbiota: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1552134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Cuffaro, F.; Russo, E.; Amedei, A. Endometriosis, Pain, and Related Psychological Disorders: Unveiling the Interplay among the Microbiome, Inflammation, and Oxidative Stress as a Common Thread. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 6473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zondervan, K.T.; Becker, C.M.; Missmer, S.A. Endometriosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1244–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Estes, S.J.; Huisingh, C.E.; Chiuve Stephanie, E.; Petruski-Ivleva, N.; Missmer, S.A. Depression, Anxiety, and Self-Directed Violence in Women with Endometriosis: A Retrospective Matched-Cohort Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2021, 190, 843–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Adewuyi, E.O.; Mehta, D.; Sapkota, Y.; Auta, A.; Yoshihara, K.; Nyegaard, M.; Griffiths, L.R.; Montgomery, G.W.; Chasman, D.I.; Nyholt, D.R. Genetic analysis of endometriosis and depression identifies shared loci and implicates causal links with gastric mucosa abnormality. Hum. Genet. 2021, 140, 529–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. McGrath, I.M.; Montgomery, G.W.; Mortlock, S. Insights from Mendelian randomization and genetic correlation analyses into the relationship between endometriosis and its comorbidities. Hum. Reprod. Update 2023, 29, 655–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Yang, F.; Liu, B.; Xu, L.; Liu, H. Age at surgery and recurrence of ovarian endometrioma after conservative surgery: A meta-analysis including 3125 patients. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2020, 302, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Donatti, L.; Malvezzi, H.; de Azevedo, B.C.; Baracat, E.C.; Podgaec, S. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Endometriosis, Psychological Based Intervention: A Systematic Review. Rev. Bras. Ginecol. Obstet. 2022, 44, 295–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Pereira, M.G.; Ribeiro, I.; Ferreira, H.; Osório, F.; Nogueira-Silva, C.; Almeida, A.C. Psychological Morbidity in Endometriosis: A Couple’s Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 10598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Candan, A.; Kohl Schwartz, A.; Birchler, K.; Leeners, B. Psychosomatic comorbidity in endometriosis: A multi-center, cross-sectional study identifying an underestimated factor in current medical support. J. Psychosom. Res. 2025, 196, 112346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Geller, S.; Levy, S.; Avitsur, R. Examining the relationship between endometriosis and psychological distress: Roles of cultural background, body image and self-criticism in women’s health. Health Psychol. Behav. Med. 2025, 13, 2511980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Facchin, F.; Grosso, F.; Saita, E.; Vercellini, P.; Pagnini, F. Can self-compassion and mindfulness predict psychological wellbeing in individuals with endometriosis? Findings from an online survey. BMC Women’s Health 2025, 25, 310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Skinner, C.M.; Kuijer, R.G. The role of self-compassion in protecting psychological wellbeing and health-related quality of life in those with endometriosis: A prospective study. J. Psychosom. Res. 2025, 196, 112322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. De Hoyos, G.; Ramos-Sostre, D.; Torres-Reverón, A.; Barros-Cartagena, B.; López-Rodríguez, V.; Nieves-Vázquez, C.; Santiago-Saavedra, F.; Appleyard, C.B.; Castro, E.M.; Flores, I. Efficacy of an environmental enrichment intervention for endometriosis: A pilot study. Front. Psychol. 2023, 14, 1225790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Geller, S.; Levy, S.; Ashkeloni, S.; Roeh, B.; Sbiet, E.; Avitsur, R. Predictors of Psychological Distress in Women with Endometriosis: The Role of Multimorbidity, Body Image, and Self-Criticism. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Farshi, N.; Hasanpour, S.; Mirghafourvand, M.; Esmaeilpour, K. Effect of self-care counselling on depression and anxiety in women with endometriosis: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry 2020, 20, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Moscucci, F.; Bucciarelli, V.; Gallina, S.; Sciomer, S.; Mattioli, A.V.; Maffei, S.; Nodari, S.; Pedrinelli, R.; Andreozzi, P.; Basili, S.; et al. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) in women: A forgotten cardiovascular risk factor. Maturitas 2025, 193, 108170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Tricco, A.C.; Lillie, E.; Zarin, W.; O’Brien, K.K.; Colquhoun, H.; Levac, D.; Moher, D.; Peters, M.D.J.; Horsley, T.; Weeks, L.; et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMAScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann. Intern. Med. 2018, 169, 467–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jcm 15 03598 g001
Figure 1. Scheme of selection of scientific publications that were included in the article. PRISMA flow diagram.
Figure 1. Scheme of selection of scientific publications that were included in the article. PRISMA flow diagram.
Jcm 15 03598 g001
Table 1. Characteristics of other studies on quality of life, depression and anxiety in patients with endometriosis.
Table 1. Characteristics of other studies on quality of life, depression and anxiety in patients with endometriosis.
PositionType of Psychosocial
Factor		Study Type, Study Group
Size		MethodologyConclusionsSource
1Affective; CognitiveSystematic review
N = 5419		NRS, VAS, SF-MPQ, HRQoL (EHP-30, SF-36), HADS, BDI/BAI, PSS, PCS, PSWQ, DERS, TAS, AIS,
Rosenberg Self-Esteem, personality
scales		Support, biopsychosocial model of endometriosis and highlighting the role of psychosocial factors in the development of the disease.Kalfas M, Chisari C, Windgassen S.
Psychosocial factors associated with pain and health-related quality of life in endometriosis: a systematic review. Eur J Pain.2022;26(10):2070–2088. [20]
2Affective; SocialCross-sectional + observation al study
N = 205		FPI, EHP-30, BDIThe impact of somatic and emotional symptoms on quality of life and psychosocial burden.Matasariu RD, Onofriescu M, Ionescu CA, et al. Psycho-social aspects of quality of life in women with endometriosis. Acta Endocrinol (Buchar).
2017;13(3):334–339. [21]
3Affective; Social; Cognitive/BehavioralNarrative ReviewDepression and anxiety scales; HRQoL (EHP-30,
SF-36); pain scales		The adverse impact of anxiety, depression, stress and social isolation on quality of life regardless of the stage of endometriosis.Dipankar SP, Sharma S, Patel R, et al. Psychological distress and quality of life in women with endometriosis: a narrative review of therapeutic approaches and challenges. Cureus. 2025;17(1):e80180.
[22]
4AffectiveSystematic review (34 studies), meta-analysis (15 studies)HADS, BDI,
STAI; diagnostic tools for mental disorders; CPP; dyspareunia; HRQoL		Endometriosis is a condition associated with significant psychological burden, including anxiety and depression.Delanerolle G, Niazi A, Lu Z, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of endometriosis and mental health sequelae: the ELEMI project. Womens Health (Lond).
2021;17:17455065211019717.
[23]
5AffectiveCross-sectional study
N = 514		Pelvic pain questionnaire (NRS); EQ-5D, EQ-VAS;
Ultrasound according to IDEA		Deep or ovarian endometriosis visualized on ultrasound does not always correlate with pain and quality of life, which justifies the diagnosis of other causes of the symptoms and the importance of comprehensive counseling.Chaggar P, Alcazar JL, Guerriero S, et al. Impact of deep or ovarian endometriosis on pelvic pain and quality of life: a prospective cross-sectional ultrasound study.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025;65(3):372–
383. [24]
6Affective; Cognitive/EmotionalCross-sectional study
N = 338		ISI, HADS,
DERS-SF; sleep measures
(satisfaction, vigilance, efficiency, timing)		Bidirectional relationship between pain and anxiety symptoms and the relationship
between sleep quality and the severity of endometriosis and psychological difficulties		Baldi E, Meneo D, et al. Sleep health and psychological well-being in
adult women: a specific focus on endometriosis—a survey study. J Clin Med. 2025;14(6):2103. [25]
7Affective; Cognitive/SocialCross-sectional observation al study
N = 139		SF-12 (PCS, MCS), HAMA, SDSStrong association between quality of life and anxiety levels and the presence of depression in women with endometriosis.He G, Chen J, Peng Z, Luo C, Zeng X. Correlation between quality of life and unhealthy emotions among patients with
endometriosis. Front Psychol.
2022;13:830698. [26]
8Affective; Behavioral/Emotion RegulationCase-control study (matched pair)
N = 246		PSQI, ISI, ESS, HADS, SF-12The key importance of sleep and fatigue in the comprehensive care of women with endometriosis.Facchin F, Burggio L, Roncella E, et al. Sleep disturbances, fatigue and psychological health in women with
endometriosis: a matched pair case-control study. Reprod Biomed Online.
2021;43(6):1035–1044. [18]
9Affective; Behavioral/Emotion RegulationCross-sectional study
N = 230		PFS, HADS, PCS, PSQI, GIQLI, FSFI, MOS-SSS, EHP-30Fatigue as a key symptom of endometriosis, mediating the relationship between pain, psychosocial functioning and quality of life, indicating the need to consider fatigue and cognitive factors in planning interventions.Mundo-López A, Carmona F, Gómez-Carranza E, et al. Contribution of chronic fatigue to psychosocial status and quality of life in Spanish women diagnosed with endometriosis. Int J Environ Res Public Health.
2020;17(11):3831. [17]
10Affective; SocialCross-sectional study (case-control/population) N = 2610SF-36v2, WPAI, WERF-EPHect EPQ-MSignificant deterioration in quality of life and productivity in Arab women with endometriosis.Mousa M, Al-Jefout M, Alsafar B, Becker CM, Zondervan KT, Rahmioglu
N. Impact of endometriosis in women of Arab ancestry on health-related quality of life, work productivity, and diagnostic delay. Front Glob Womens Health.
2021;2:708410. [13]
11Affective; Social; Cognitive/BehavioralCross-sectional study (Mixed-methods) N = 23HADS, SF-12, PHQ-15,
Functional Well-being-7; interviews; symptom diary		Significant association of anxiety and depression with endometriosis in research results.Olliges E, Bobinger A, Weber A, et al. Physical, psychological, and social day-to-day experience of women living with endometriosis compared to healthy age-matched controls: a mixed-methods study. Front Glob Womens
Health. 2021;2:767114. [27]
12Affective; Social; SomaticCross-sectional/an alytical study
N = 953		QoL tools: EHP-30, SF-36;
registry/survey data		The persistent strong impact of endometriosis on quality of life in the general population; the need to include the problem in clinical care also outside
specialist centres.		Kogelman LJK, et al. The burden of endometriosis on quality of life in Danish women: an analysis of the Danish Blood Donor Study.
BMC Med. 2025;23. [28]
13Affective; SomaticCross-sectional study
N = 199		SHAPS, BDI-II, HADS, NRSThe need to expand care for patients with endometriosis to include the assessment of anhedonia and loss of pleasure, in addition to symptoms of anxiety and
depression.		Mallorquí A, Fortuna A, Segura M, et al. Prevalence of anhedonia in women with deep endometriosis. Sci Rep. 2024;14:84772. [29]
14Behavioral; Social; SomaticCross-sectional study
N = 200		HPLP, EIQThe need to integrate health-promoting activities and support a healthy lifestyle in endometriosis treatment strategies.Mollazadeh S, Najmabadi KM, Mirghafourvand M. Health-promoting lifestyle and its relationship with the effects of endometriosis on women’s lives in Iran: a cross-sectional study. BMC Womens Health. 2022;22.
[30]
15Cognitive; Affective; SomaticNarrative ReviewSF-36, WHOQOL-BREF, EQ-5D, EHP-30, EHP-5,
FertiQoL, FPI		A review of QoL tools confirming the need for a multidimensional approach, encompassing psychological well-being and social functioning.Manu A. Quality of life assessment and clinical implications for women with endometriosis through validated tools: a narrative review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024;61(10):1729.
[31]
16Affective; Cognitive; SomaticCross-sectional study
N = 653		DASS-21, EHP-5, NRSDiagnostic delays as a significant source of psychological burden; the need for therapeutic support before diagnosis.Mosterd D, et al. Comparing psychological distress, health-related quality of life and pain in diagnosed versus suspected endometriosis.
Preprint. 2025. [32]
17Behavioral; Affective; SomaticRandomize d controlled trial
N = 31		PFS, PSQI, HADS, GIQLI,
FSFI; physical fitness tests: back dynamometer,
Schöber, Flamingo, 6MWT		Multimodal therapeutic training as an effective support for the treatment of endometriosis.Salinas-Asensio M.D.M., et al. Changes in fatigue, sleep quality, mental health and sexual function after a multimodal supervised exercise program in women with endometriosis unresponsive to conventional therapy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod
Biol. 2025;114083. [33]
18Cognitive; Affective; Behavioral; SocialCross-sectional study
N = 262		PPIQ, PSEQ,
PSS-10, NRS, GPAQ, SF-36		Results supporting a biopsychosocial approach to endometriosis.Kovács-Szabó Z, Ács P, Prémusz V, Makai A, Hock
M. Psychological, symptom-related, and lifestyle predictors of health-related quality of life in Hungarian women with endometriosis. J Clin Med.
2021;10:7004. [34]
19Affective; CognitiveCross-sectional study
N = 425		EHP, LOT-R,
GSES; socio-
Economic and diagnostic-therapeutic questionnaire		Self-efficacy and optimism as protective psychological resources in endometriosis; need for integration in clinical care.Bień A, Pokropska A, Grzesik-Gąsior J, et al. Quality of life in women with endometriosis: the importance of
sociodemographic, diagnostic-therapeutic, and psychological factors. J Clin Med. 2025;14(12):4268.
(Bień, Pokropska, Grzesik-Gąsior, Korżyńska-Piętas, Pieczykolan Agnieszkaand Zarajczyk, et al., 2025)
[35]
20Behavioral; Social; SomaticCross-sectional study
N = 200		HPLP, EIQ;
sociodemograph ic questionnaires		The need to take into account lifestyle factors and social support in carepatientswith endometriosis.Mollazadeh S., Najmabadi KM, Mirghafourvand M. Health-promoting lifestyle and its relationship with the effects of endometriosis on women’s lives in Iran: a cross-sectional study. BMC Womens Health.
2022;22. [30]
21Cognitive; Behavioral; AffectiveCross-sectional/an alytical study
N = 644		QoL clustering; SF-36 or other QoL profilePersonalized care as a key element in the management of women with endometriosis.Vallée A. Quality of life identification by unsupervised cluster analysis: a new approach to modeling the burden of endometriosis. PLoS One.
2024;19:e0317178. [36]
22Affective; Cognitive; Behavioral; SocialNarrative literature reviewEHP-30, SF-36,
HADS, BDI; pain scales; biopsychosocial models		The need to implement a biopsychosocial approach in clinical care.Noditi A., et al. Analysis of the biopsychosocial impacts associated with endometriosis to improve patient care. J Clin Med.
2023;12(7):2158. [37]
23Affective; Cognitive; BehavioralNarrative literature reviewHADS, EHP-30;
adolescent health tools		Early diagnosis and psychological support as key elements of care; significant impact of adolescent endometriosis on psychosocial
development.		Panvino F., et al. Endometriosis in adolescence: A narrative review of the psychological and clinical implications
2025;15(5):548. [38]
24Affective; SomaticCross-sectional study
N = 212		SHAPS, NRS, HADS, BDI-IIAnhedonia as an overlooked aspect of mental health; an indication for routine psychological assessment in
women with endometriosis.		Mallorquí A, Fortuna A, Segura M, et al. Prevalence of anhedonia in women with deep endometriosis.
Sci Rep. 2024;14:84772. [29]
25Affective; Social; CognitiveCross-sectional study (Mixed-methods) N = 533FSI, DASS-21, MSPSS, WHOQOL-BREFValidation of patient experiences as one of the key determinants of quality of lifeKatz C, Armor M, et al. “Listen to women as if they were your most cherished person”: an Australian mixed-methods study on endometriosis care. J
Health Psychol. 2024;29:13591053241250101.
[39]
26Affective; Cognitive; SocialProspective cohort study N = 205EHP, VAS, EHP-30No evidence of improved quality of life as a result of early diagnosis and treatment; confirmed pain reduction in patients.Kaveh M, Nakhaee Moghadam M. The impact of early diagnosis of endometriosis on quality of life. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025;312. [40]
27Affective; Cognitive; Symptom-relatedProspective study (quasi-
experimenta l)
N = 117		SF-36, STAI-Y1, SDS, VASPain reduction does not necessarily translate into improved mental health.Cagnacci A, et al. Chronic pelvic pain improvement: impact on quality of life and mood. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol.
2018;39(4):256–262. [41]
28Cognitive; Behavioral; AffectivePilot cohort study (digital health)
N = 241		Symptom Monitoring App; EHP-30; NRS; EHP-5; EQ-5DDigital programs as a valuable addition to therapy for women with endometriosis.Breton Z, Stern E, et al. A digital program for daily life management with endometriosis: a feasibility study. JMIR.
2023;25:e58262. [42]
29Social; Affective; CognitiveCross-sectional study (mixed-methods) N = 389EHP-30, VIRS, PHQ-9, GAD-7The key role of communication in shaping the quality of life; validation of the patient’s experience as a protective factor, lackvalidation as a risk factor for worsening HRQoL.Grundström H, et al. Experiences of communication with healthcare professionals in women with endometriosis. Health
Commun. 2023. [43]
30Social; Affective; CognitiveCross-sectional study
N = 543		Social Negativity Scale, PLCI, SF-12The negative impact of social relationships as a psychosocial factor; the importance of assessing patients’ social environment and psychoeducational interventions.Zarecki C. et al. Understanding the role of social negativity in percived life course impact and mental health among woman with endometriosis. J Clin Med.
2025;14(13):4761. [44]
31Affective; Cognitive; Symptom-relatedCross-sectional study with regression N = 175EHP-30, NRS,
VAS, ESHRE
guidelines		Quality of life depends on the nature of the symptomsmorethan the stage of disease progression; the crucial importance of pain
control.		Kupec T., et al. The multifactorial burden of endometriosis: prediction of quality of life. J Clin Med. 2025;14(2):323. [45]
32Affective; Symptom-relatedCross-sectional study
N = 425		EHP-30, VAS/NRS,
symptom scales		The importance of effective pain management and consideration of comorbidities for improving QoL.Bień A., et al. Clinical factors affecting the quality of life of women with endometriosis. J Adv Nurs. 2025;81(8):4667–4680 [46]
Note: AIS—Athens Insomnia Scale, BAI—Beck Anxiety Inventory, BDI/BDI-II—Beck Depression Inventory./Beck Depression Inventory-II, CPP—Chronic Pelvic Pain, DASS-21—Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21, DERS/DERS-SF—Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale/Short Form, EHP/EHP-30/EHP-5—Endometriosis Health Profile/30-item/5-item, EIQ—Endometriosis Impact Questionn, EQ-5D/EQ-VAS—EuroQol 5 Dimensions/Visual Analogue Scale, EPQ-M—EPHect Minimum Clinical Questionnaire, ESS—Epworth Sleepiness Scale, FertiQoL—Fertility Quality of Life, FPI—Fertility Problem Inventory, FSFI—Female Sexual Function Index, FSI—Fatigue Symptom Inventory, GAD-7—Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, GIQLI—Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index, GPAQ—Global Physical Activity Questionnaire, GSES—General Self-Efficacy Scale, HADS—Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HAMA—Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, HPLP—Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile, HRQoL—Health-Related Quality of Life, ISI—Insomnia Severity Index, LOT-R—Life Orientation Test-Revised, MOS-SSS—Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey, MSPSS—Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, NRS—Numeric Rating Scale, PCS—Pain Catastrophizing Scale, PHQ-9/PHQ-15—Patient Health Questionnaire-9/Somatic Symptoms-15, PLCI—Perceived Life Course Impact, PPIQ—Pelvic Pain Impact Questionnaire, PFS—Piper Fatigue Scale, PSEQ—Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, PSQI—Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PSS/PSS-10—Perceived Stress Scale/10-item, PSWQ—Penn State Worry Questionnaire, SDS—Self-Rating Depression Scale, SF-12/SF-36/SF-36v2—Short Form Health Survey, SHAPS—Snaith–Hamilton Pleasure Scale, STAI/STAI-Y1—State-Trait Anxiety Inventory/Form Y-1, TAS—Toronto Alexithymia Scale, VAS—Visual Analogue Scale, VIRS—Validation and Invalidation Response Scale, WPAI—Work Productivity and Activity Impairment, WERF-EPHect—World Endometriosis Research Foundation Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonization Project, WHOQOL-BREF—World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF.
Table 2. Health and psychosocial consequences of endometriosis.
Table 2. Health and psychosocial consequences of endometriosis.
Somatic Symptoms
and Complications		Impact on Mental
Well-Being		Important Psychological
Factors		Psychosocial
Consequences
Chronic pelvic painDepressive disorders,
low mood, anxiety		Pain catastrophization,
anticipatory anxiety, feeling
of helplessness		Lack of understanding from the
environment, diagnostic delay,
lack of adequate support
Painful periods (dysmenorrhoea)Emotional tension,
irritability		Reduced stress tolerance, negative beliefs about the diseaseProfessional withdrawal,
marginalization of symptoms
(“normalization of pain”)
Abnormal bleedingSleep disturbances,
exhaustion		Constant worryingDifficulties in fulfilling professional roles and social activities
DyspareuniaDecreased quality of sexual life, avoidance of intercourseFear of pain,
negative body image		Tensions in the relationship,
decreased satisfaction with the
partner relationship
Pain when urinating/defecatingIntensification of somatic symptoms of anxietyInteroceptive hypersensitivity, avoidance of painful stimuliSocial isolation
Fatigue, insomniaIncreased susceptibility
to depressive and anxiety disorders		Emotional regulation disorders, low mental resilienceDeterioration of productivity in every sphere of functioning
Fertility problemsSense of loss, lowered
self-esteem		Internalization of negative
beliefs about oneself		Stigmatization, feeling of social
pressure, relationship tensions
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zieliński, D.; Tokarczyk, K.; Piegza, M. Selected Parameters of the Mental State of Women with Endometriosis—A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15, 3598. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15103598

AMA Style

Zieliński D, Tokarczyk K, Piegza M. Selected Parameters of the Mental State of Women with Endometriosis—A Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2026; 15(10):3598. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15103598

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zieliński, Damian, Kamila Tokarczyk, and Magdalena Piegza. 2026. "Selected Parameters of the Mental State of Women with Endometriosis—A Systematic Review" Journal of Clinical Medicine 15, no. 10: 3598. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15103598

APA Style

Zieliński, D., Tokarczyk, K., & Piegza, M. (2026). Selected Parameters of the Mental State of Women with Endometriosis—A Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 15(10), 3598. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15103598

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop