Kahook Dual Blade Goniotomy Outcomes in the Underserved Dominican Republic Black and Afro-Latinx Population
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methods
2.1. Kahook Dual Blade Surgical Technique
2.2. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Intraocular-Pressure Reduction
3.2. Medication Burden
3.3. Surgical Success
3.4. Complications
4. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
KDB | Kahook Dual Blade |
IOP | intraocular pressure |
MIGS | minimally invasive glaucoma surgery |
References
- Quigley, H.A.; Broman, A.T. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2006, 90, 262–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Racette, L.; Wilson, M.R.; Zangwill, L.M.; Weinreb, R.N.; Sample, P.A. Primary open-angle glaucoma in blacks: A review. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2003, 48, 295–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gordon, M.O.; Beiser, J.A.; Brandt, J.D.; Heuer, D.K.; Higginbotham, E.J.; Johnson, C.A.; Keltner, J.L.; Miller, J.P.; Parrish, R.K., 2nd; Wilson, M.R.; et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: Baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2002, 120, 714–720; discussion 829–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gedde, S.J.; Herndon, L.W.; Brandt, J.D.; Budenz, D.L.; Feuer, W.J.; Schiffman, J.C.; Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study Group. Postoperative complications in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) study during five years of follow-up. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2012, 153, 804–814.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saheb, H.; Ahmed, I.I. Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery: Current perspectives and future directions. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 2012, 23, 96–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Grant, W.M. Clinical measurements of aqueous outflow. AMA Arch. Ophthalmol. 1951, 46, 113–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Seibold, L.K.; Soohoo, J.R.; Ammar, D.A.; Kahook, M.Y. Preclinical investigation of ab interno trabeculectomy using a novel dual-blade device. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2013, 155, 524–529.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- SooHoo, J.R.; Seibold, L.K.; Kahook, M.Y. Ab interno trabeculectomy in the adult patient. Middle E. Afr. J. Ophthalmol. 2015, 22, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dorairaj, S.K.; Seibold, L.K.; Radcliffe, N.M.; Aref, A.A.; Jimenez-Roman, J.; Lazcano-Gomez, G.S.; Darlington, J.K.; Mansouri, K.; Berdahl, J.P. 12-Month Outcomes of Goniotomy Performed Using the Kahook Dual Blade Combined with Cataract Surgery in Eyes with Medically Treated Glaucoma. Adv. Ther. 2018, 35, 1460–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Greenwood, M.D.; Seibold, L.K.; Radcliffe, N.M.; Dorairaj, S.K.; Aref, A.A.; Roman, J.J.; Lazcano-Gomez, G.S.; Darlington, J.K.; Abdullah, S.; Jasek, M.C.; et al. Goniotomy with a single-use dual blade: Short-term results. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 2017, 43, 1197–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Salinas, L.; Chaudhary, A.; Berdahl, J.P.; Lazcano-Gomez, G.S.; Williamson, B.K.; Dorairaj, S.K.; Seibold, L.K.; Smith, S.; Aref, A.A.; Darlington, J.K.; et al. Goniotomy Using the Kahook Dual Blade in Severe and Refractory Glaucoma: 6-Month Outcomes. J. Glaucoma 2018, 27, 849–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Francis, B.A.; Akil, H.; Bert, B.B. Ab interno Schlemm's Canal Surgery. Dev. Ophthalmol. 2017, 59, 127–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sieck, E.G.; Epstein, R.S.; Kennedy, J.B.; SooHoo, J.R.; Pantcheva, M.B.; Patnaik, J.L.; Wagner, B.D.; Lynch, A.M.; Kahook, M.Y.; Seibold, L.K. Outcomes of Kahook Dual Blade Goniotomy with and without Phacoemulsification Cataract Extraction. Ophthalmol. Glaucoma 2018, 1, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hirabayashi, M.T.; King, J.T.; Lee, D.; An, J.A. Outcome of phacoemulsification combined with excisional goniotomy using the Kahook Dual Blade in severe glaucoma patients at 6 months. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2019, 13, 715–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bravetti, G.E.; Gillmann, K.; Salinas, L.; Berdahl, J.P.; Lazcano-Gomez, G.S.; Williamson, B.K.; Dorairaj, S.K.; Seibold, L.K.; Smith, S.; Aref, A.A.; et al. Surgical outcomes of excisional goniotomy using the kahook dual blade in severe and refractory glaucoma: 12-month results. Eye 2022, 37, 1608–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sommer, A. Glaucoma risk factors observed in the Baltimore Eye Survey. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 1996, 7, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Varma, R.; Paz, S.H.; Azen, S.P.; Klein, R.; Globe, D.; Torres, M.; Shufelt, C.; Preston-Martin, S.; Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Group. The Los Angeles Latino Eye Study: Design, methods, and baseline data. Ophthalmology 2004, 111, 1121–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 4. Comparison of treatment outcomes within race. Seven-year results. Ophthalmology 1998, 105, 1146–1164. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Soh, Z.; Yu, M.; Betzler, B.K.; Majithia, S.; Thakur, S.; Tham, Y.C.; Wong, T.Y.; Aung, T.; Friedman, D.S.; Cheng, C.Y. The Global Extent of Undetected Glaucoma in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2021, 128, 1393–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
N | % | |
---|---|---|
Patients | 90 | |
Eyes | 90 | |
Gender | ||
Female | 45 | 50.0% |
Male | 45 | 50.0% |
Age, years | ||
Mean (SD) | 65.3 (13.5) | |
Median | 66 | |
Range | 24–89 | |
Eyes | ||
Left | 44 | 48.9% |
Right | 46 | 51.1% |
Glaucoma Severity | ||
Mild | 8 | 8.9% |
Moderate | 34 | 37.8% |
Severe | 48 | 53.3% |
Glaucoma Type | ||
CACG | 4 | 4.4% |
Juvenile | 3 | 3.3% |
POAG | 69 | 76.7% |
Pigmentary | 14 | 15.6% |
Type of Surgery | ||
KDB and Phaco | 87 | 96.7% |
KDB only | 3 | 3.3% |
Preop BCVA | ||
Mean (SD) | 0.806 (0.51) | |
Median | 0.699 | |
Range | 0–2.5 | |
Postop BCVA | ||
Mean (SD) | 0.490 (0.48) | |
Median | 0.398 | |
Range | 0–2.5 |
Preoperative | Day 1 | Week 1 | Month 1 | Month 3 | Month 6 | Month 12 | Month 16 | Month 20 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | 90 | 90 | 90 | 89 | 89 | 89 | 89 | 88 | 88 |
IOP | |||||||||
Mean (SD) | 20.5 (4.8) | 13.0 (3.9) | 12.9 (3.8) | 13.5 (2.9) | 13.1 (2.8) | 13.2 (3.7) | 13.5 (3.5) | 13.0 (2.5) | 13.0 (2.5) |
Median | 20 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 |
Range | 11–36 | 5–29 | 5–34 | 7–28 | 7–22 | 8–39 | 6–29 | 7–21 | 8–19 |
p-value * | - | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
IOP | |||||||||
<21 | 47 (52.2%) | 87 (96.7%) | 88 (97.8%) | 88 (98.9%) | 87 (97.8%) | 87 (97.8%) | 87 (97.8%) | 87 (98.9%) | 88 (100%) |
21+ | 43 (47.8%) | 3 (3.3%) | 2 (2.2%) | 1 (1.1%) | 2 (2.2%) | 2 (2.2%) | 2 (2.2%) | 1 (1.1%) | 0 (0%) |
Percent IOP Reduction | |||||||||
Mean (SD) | - | −34.1 (22.6) | −34.5 (23.4) | −31.5 (18.8) | −33.9 (17.3) | −32.1 (26.6) | −32.0 (21.2) | −33.8 (18.5) | −34.4 (17.4) |
Median | −36.2 | −38.5 | −34.6 | −36.8 | −35.7 | −38.1 | −39.1 | −39.2 | |
Range | −74, 46 | −72, 79 | −69, 47 | −67, 27 | −69, 144 | −68, 54 | −72, 23 | −67, 12 |
Preoperative | Day 1 | Week 1 | Month 1 | Month 3 | Month 6 | Month 12 | Month 16 | Month 20 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | 90 | 90 | 90 | 89 | 89 | 89 | 89 | 88 | 88 |
Number medications | 2.3 (0.9) | 1.0 (0.1) | 0.1 (0.4) | 0.2 (0.6) | 0.2 (0.7) | 0.3 (0.7) | 0.3 (0.7) | 0.3 (0.7) | |
Mean (SD) | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Medianrange | 0–4 | 1–2 | 0–3 | 0–3 | 0–3 | 0–3 | 0–3 | 0–3 | |
p-value * | - | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | |
Decreased medications by at least one | - | - | 74 (82.2%) | 86 (96.6%) | 84 (94.4%) | 83 (94.3%) | 81 (93.1%) | 82 (93.2%) | 82 (93.2%) |
Not on any medications | 2 (2.2%) | - | 0 (0%) | 83 (93.3%) | 77 (86.5%) | 74 (84.1%) | 71 (81.6%) | 72 (81.8%) | 72 (81.8%) |
Pre-Surgery | Day 1 | Week 1 | Month 1 | Month 3 | Month 6 | Month 12 | Month 16 | Month 20 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Surgery success | - | - | 86 (95.6%) | 88 (98.9%) | 87 (97.8%) | 86 (97.7%) | 86 (97.7%) | 86 (97.7%) | 84 (95.4%) |
Total | KDB/Phaco | KDB Only | |
---|---|---|---|
Total eyes | 90 | 87 | 3 |
Complications | |||
Transient hyphema | 4 (4.4%) | 4 (4.6%) | 0 |
Hypertension | 3 (3.3%) | 3 (3.4%) | 0 |
Additional surgery | 2 (2.2%) | 2 (2.3%) | 0 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ifantides, C.; Bejar, H.; Patnaik, J.; Sieck, E.; Pantcheva, M.; Young, C.C.; Arbaje, M.; McCollum, W. Kahook Dual Blade Goniotomy Outcomes in the Underserved Dominican Republic Black and Afro-Latinx Population. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 2201. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14072201
Ifantides C, Bejar H, Patnaik J, Sieck E, Pantcheva M, Young CC, Arbaje M, McCollum W. Kahook Dual Blade Goniotomy Outcomes in the Underserved Dominican Republic Black and Afro-Latinx Population. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(7):2201. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14072201
Chicago/Turabian StyleIfantides, Cristos, Hernan Bejar, Jennifer Patnaik, Erin Sieck, Mina Pantcheva, Cara Capitena Young, Margarita Arbaje, and William McCollum. 2025. "Kahook Dual Blade Goniotomy Outcomes in the Underserved Dominican Republic Black and Afro-Latinx Population" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 7: 2201. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14072201
APA StyleIfantides, C., Bejar, H., Patnaik, J., Sieck, E., Pantcheva, M., Young, C. C., Arbaje, M., & McCollum, W. (2025). Kahook Dual Blade Goniotomy Outcomes in the Underserved Dominican Republic Black and Afro-Latinx Population. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(7), 2201. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14072201