Next Article in Journal
Promising, but Not Completely Conclusive—The Effect of l-Theanine on Cognitive Performance Based on the Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trials
Previous Article in Journal
Wealth, Unemployment, Social Investment, and Risk of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction—An Ecological Analysis of a Low-Cardiovascular-Risk European Region
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Reply

Reply to Fernández et al. Comment on “Goudra et al. Anesthesia for Bronchoscopy—An Update. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 6471”

by
Basavana Goudra
1,2,*,
Lalitha Sundararaman
3,
Prarthna Chandar
2,4 and
Michael Green
1,2
1
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
2
Sidney Kimmel Medical College, 111 S 11th Street, #8280, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
3
Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA 02115, USA
4
Department of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(21), 7709; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14217709
Submission received: 27 August 2025 / Accepted: 20 October 2025 / Published: 30 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Anesthesiology)
Thank you for reading our review and providing valuable feedback [1]. We hope the following addresses your questions.
Performing bronchoscopic procedures, predominantly under general anesthesia, is more of a US preference; both patients and pulmonologists favor this approach. However, we agree that many of these procedures could be performed under deep or even moderate sedation. A motionless patient certainly provides the optimum condition to the bronchoscopist performing the procedure; nevertheless, it is expensive. Often, the choice of anesthesia/sedation is an institutional practice.
Regarding the use of vasopressors, the incidence of intraprocedural hypotension is known to be high with propofol-based intravenous anesthesia. In a recent study, Kotani et al. observed a 21.6% incidence of hypotension at induction with the propofol group (in comparison to the remimazolam group (11.9%)) [2]. They were treated with both ephedrine and phenylephrine, and patients in the propofol group required higher amounts of ephedrine. Hypotension occurs even more frequently in the elderly (59.7% vs. 33.3%) [3]. Depending on the center, in the USA, vasopressor infusions, mainly phenylephrine, are often employed for maintaining blood pressure. It is stated that a mean blood pressure below 60 mm Hg is associated with a decreased hepatic metabolism of drugs, worsening of hypoxemia, and delayed recovery from anesthesia. Rarely, neuromuscular complications and central nervous system abnormalities, including blindness after anesthesia, are possible [4]. Although the cited study included only patients undergoing vascular surgery, Wales et al. concluded that patients who sustained a 40% decrease from the preinduction mean arterial blood pressure with a cumulative duration of more than 30 min suffered more frequent postoperative myocardial injury [5].
In the USA, in the operating/procedure rooms, propofol is always administered by an anesthesia provider. This includes a physician, an anesthesiologist, a certified registered nurse anesthetist, or an anesthesiology assistant. However, administration of moderate sedation (more popularly referred to as conscious sedation) is usually performed by a certified nurse under the supervision of a proceduralist, in this case, the pulmonologist performing the procedure.
We agree that in carefully selected patients, airway adjuncts such as SuperNO2VA™ add to the safety of deep sedation. We have used them extensively in patients undergoing gastroenterological procedures, including endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. However, we have no experience of using it in bronchoscopic procedures.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fernández, A.B.; Gálvez, M.; García, R. Comment on Goudra et al. Anesthesia for Bronchoscopy—An Update. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 6471. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 7708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kotani, T.; Ida, M.; Naito, Y.; Kawaguchi, M. Comparison of remimazolam-based and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on hemodynamics during anesthesia induction in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A randomized controlled trial. J. Anesth. 2024, 38, 330–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jeon, Y.G.; Kim, S.; Park, J.H.; Lee, J.; Song, S.; Lim, H.K.; Song, S.W. Incidence of intraoperative hypotension in older patients undergoing total intravenous anesthesia by remimazolam versus propofol: A randomized controlled trial. Medicine 2023, 102, e36440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Blood pressure ups and downs: Monitoring and troubleshooting blood pressure under anesthesia (Proceedings). In DVM 360; MJH Life Sciences: Cranbury, NJ, USA, 2009; Available online: https://www.dvm360.com/view/blood-pressure-ups-and-downs-monitoring-and-troubleshooting-blood-pressure-under-anesthesia-proceedi (accessed on 12 August 2025).
  5. van Waes, J.A.R.; van Klei, W.A.; Wijeysundera, D.N.; van Wolfswinkel, L.; Lindsay, T.F.; Beattie, W.S. Association between Intraoperative Hypotension and Myocardial Injury after Vascular Surgery. Anesthesiology 2016, 124, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Goudra, B.; Sundararaman, L.; Chandar, P.; Green, M. Reply to Fernández et al. Comment on “Goudra et al. Anesthesia for Bronchoscopy—An Update. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 6471”. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 7709. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14217709

AMA Style

Goudra B, Sundararaman L, Chandar P, Green M. Reply to Fernández et al. Comment on “Goudra et al. Anesthesia for Bronchoscopy—An Update. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 6471”. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(21):7709. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14217709

Chicago/Turabian Style

Goudra, Basavana, Lalitha Sundararaman, Prarthna Chandar, and Michael Green. 2025. "Reply to Fernández et al. Comment on “Goudra et al. Anesthesia for Bronchoscopy—An Update. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 6471”" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 21: 7709. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14217709

APA Style

Goudra, B., Sundararaman, L., Chandar, P., & Green, M. (2025). Reply to Fernández et al. Comment on “Goudra et al. Anesthesia for Bronchoscopy—An Update. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 6471”. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(21), 7709. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14217709

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop